You are on page 1of 3

AFM 331 Peer Evaluation

Evaluated by ID Number ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Section (circle) 8:30 10:00 1:00 2:30

Team Number [for case presentation only]

_____________

This peer evaluation is NOT an optional exercise. You may return a completed hard copy to your instructor OR submit a completed electronic copy in the AFM 331 Peer Evaluation Drop-box. Failure to submit an evaluation will result in a grade of zero (0) for the teamwork component. The completion of this rating sheet is an individual exercise. Your instructor will hold the individual reports in strict confidence; no student will see your rating sheet. Your instructor will use this feedback in assigning a grade to each student for the teamwork component of the assignment grade. The Group Process & Contribution statements are on the following page. For each team member and yourself, insert rating of (1) to (5). Group Process Statements Team Members Name Enjoyment Attitude Ability Contribution Statements Quantity Quality Capability

My self evaluation I have considered this evaluation carefully and attest to the performance of my fellow students as indicated above.

AFM 331 Peer Evaluation


__________________________________________________________

AFM 331 Peer Evaluation

The evaluation is divided into two parts: (1) group process, which is the act of working effectively with other people; and (2) contribution, which is the extent of the groups workload delivered by the individual student. Group Process Rating Statements Contribution Rating Statements

A. This members ability to get along with people in the groups work
environment was very good. I enjoyed being in the group with this individual. 1) Strongly Disagree 2) Disagree 3) Neither Agree Nor Disagree 4) Agree 5) Strongly Agree This members attitude in group interactions was always constructive, positive, and helped move the groups work forward. I would definitely want this individual in my group again. 6) Strongly Disagree 7) Disagree 8) Neither Agree Nor Disagree 9) Agree 10) Strongly Agree The group would have been less effective if this member had not been in the group. I believe this individuals group process abilities (leadership, facilitation, and coordination) set a very good standard for his/her fellow students. 11) Strongly Disagree 12) Disagree 13) Neither Agree Nor Disagree 14) Agree 15) Strongly Agree

B. This member did his/her fair share of the groups work, meeting
expectations for the quantity of work at a reasonable level of quality. This individuals quantity of work was an appropriate contribution. 1) Strongly Disagree 2) Disagree 3) Neither Agree Nor Disagree 4) Agree 5) Strongly Agree This member provided work that clearly demonstrated an understanding of course content and case requirements. This individuals quality of work was an appropriate contribution. 6) Strongly Disagree 7) Disagree 8) Neither Agree Nor Disagree 9) Agree 10) Strongly Agree The groups deliverables would have been less effective if this member had not been in the group. I believe this individuals strategy capabilities (describing, assessing, developing, and implementing strategy) set a very good standard for his/her fellow students. 11) Strongly Disagree 12) Disagree 13) Neither Agree Nor Disagree 14) Agree 15) Strongly Agree

You might also like