02.-DISEÑO DE LOSAS ESTRUCTURALES EN DOS DIRECCIONES. - Ing. Jose - Izquierdo.

DISEO DE LOSAS ESTRUCTURALES EN DOS DIRECCIONES
PORTICUS, Presidente
Ing. Jos Miguel Izquierdo Encarnacin, BSCE, MCE, FACI
ACI Internacional, Presidente 2003-2004 Colegio de Ingenieros y Agrimensores de PR, Presidente 1994-1996
LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES
ANALISIS Y DISEO SIMPLIFICADO, INCLUYENDO HOJA DE EXCEL MTODO EMPRICO POR EL ACI 318
ANLISIS Y DISEO
USO DE MTODO DE ELEMENTOS FINITOS PARA ANLISIS DEFORMACIONES
TIPOS DE SISTEMAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES
ANLISIS Y DISEO SIMPLIFICADO
La publicacin de los Requisitos esenciales para edificaciones de concreto reforzado es el resultado de un acuerdo de cooperacin entre el American Concrete Institute y dos instituciones colombianas: el Instituto Colombiano de Normas Tcnicas y Certificacin y la Asociacin Colombiana de Ingeniera Ssmica.
Alcance
El propsito de el documento es disear y construir edificaciones de concreto reforzado para edificios de baja altura, de ocupacin, nmero de pisos y rea limitados.
Propsito
Estructuras de baja altura Se utilizan reconocidos modelos simplificados de resistencia y de dimensiones mnimas. Materiales y construccin estn orientados al uso de aceros de grados de resistencia mnima y concretos de resistencia media. El documento es autnomo; por ello incluye cargas y procesos simplificados de anlisis as como los requisitos de exploracin geotcnica para la definicin de la capacidad portante del terreno.
Propsito
La resistencia ssmica se basa en el empleo de muros estructurales de concreto (muros de corte). Cumplimiento automtico con los Cdigos. Mltiples tablas y diagramas. Los requisitos se presentan en el orden que se necesitan a medida que se avanza en el diseo.
Todo en un slo documento!
1.3 - Limitaciones
Nmero mximo de pisos = 5 Nmero mximo de stanos = 1 rea mxima por piso = 1000 m2. Altura mxima de entrepiso = 4 m. Luz mxima = 10 m. Diferencia mxima entre luces = 20% Nmero mnimo de luces = 2 Mxima longitud de voladizos = 1/3 longitud vano anterior Pendiente mxima para losas, vigas y viguetas = 15 Pendiente mxima del terreno = una elevacin equivalente a la altura del primer piso, sin exceder 30.
CAP 7 - LOSAS MACIZAS SOBRE VIGAS MAESTRAS, VIGAS, VIGUETAS O MUROS DE CONCRETO REFORZADO
Definicin de cargas de diseo Detalles generales de refuerzo Losas entre viguetas Voladizos en losas Losas macizas en una direccin de una luz Losas macizas en una direccin de dos o ms luces Losas en dos direcciones
10
7.3.3 - Refuerzo por retraccin y temperatura
11
7.3.4 - Refuerzo a flexin
12
7.3.4 - Refuerzo a flexin
Resistencia nominal a flexin
s f y
13
7.3.4.3 - rea mxima de refuerzo a tensin por flexin.
14
7.3.8.2 - Refuerzo inferior de esquina.
15
7.6.3.4 - Refuerzo de voladizos en dos direcciones.
16
7.9 - LOSAS MACIZAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES SOBRE VIGAS MAESTRAS, VIGAS O MUROS
Debe haber dos o ms luces. Los vanos son aproximadamente iguales, y el menor de dos vanos adyacentes no debe ser menor del 80 por ciento del vano ms largo (vase 1.3). Las vigas o vigas maestras de apoyo se construyen monolticamente con la losa y deben tener una altura no menor a tres veces el espesor de la losa Las cargas estn distribuidas uniformemente. La carga viva unitaria, q", no excede tres veces la carga muerta unitaria, qd.
17
7.9.1 - Requisitos dimensionales
18
7.9.2 - Resistencia requerida a flexin
19
20
21
7. Losas macizas en dos direcciones

Panel Interior
22

Panel de borde, "a paralelo al borde
23

Panel de borde,
"b paralelo
al borde
24

Panel de esquina
25
7.9.3.2 - Refuerzo a flexin
26
7.9.4 - Verificacin de resistencia a cortante
27
7.9.4 - Verificacin de resistencia a cortante
28
PROGRAMMED FOR
AC ENGINEERING SOFTWARE TWO WAY CONCRETE SLAB DESIGN PORTICUS
INPUT DATA
= = = = = 4 19.25 FT 30.25 FT 8.00 IN 60.0 PSF
FOR SLAB BOUNDARY CONDITION INPUT CASE TYPE, FOR EXAMPLE 4
SLAB BOUNDARY CONDITIONS LENGTH OF SHORT SIDE, LENGTH OF LONG SIDE, THICKNESS OF SLAB, DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOAD,
DISTRIBUTED ADDITIONAL DEAD LOAD,
65.0 PSF
OUTPUT DATA NEGATIVE MOMENT SHORT SIDE = = = = = = 4.24 KIP-FT 6.71 KIP-FT 2.80 KIP-FT 0.70 KIP/FT 2.76 KIP/FT
-ULTIMATE VALUES10.62 KIP-FT
BAR SPACING 5@ 10.3 IN. 5@ 5@ 5@ MIN= ( 24.1 IN. 16.6 IN. 27.0 IN. 1.55283 )
NEGATIVE MOMENT LONG SIDE POSITIVE MOMENT SHORT SIDE
POSITIVE MOMENT LONG SIDE REACTION SHORT SIDE REACTION LONG SIDE
MIN 0.47334 KIP/FT 0.34712 KIP/FT 0.12623 KIP/FT 1.44375 KIP/FT 1.05875 KIP/FT 0.38500 KIP/FT
SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE TOTAL LOAD =
SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE DEAD LOAD = SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE LIVE LOAD =
LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE TOTAL LOAD =
1.86441 KIP/FT 1.36723 KIP/FT 0.49718 KIP/FT
LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE DEAD LOAD = LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE LIVE LOAD =
29
AC ENGINEERING SOFTWARE PROGRAMMED FOR
TWO WAY CONCRETE SLAB DESIGN

PORTICUS
FOR SLAB BOUNDARY CONDITION INPUT CASE

TYPE, FOR EXAMPLE 4 = = = = = = 8.00 IN 60.0 PSF 65.0 PSF -ULTIMATE VALUES= = = = = = 10.62 KIP-FT 4.24 KIP-FT 6.71 KIP-FT 2.80 KIP-FT 0.70 KIP/FT 2.76 KIP/FT BAR SPACING 5@ 5@ 5@ 5@ MIN= ( 10.3 IN. 24.1 IN. 16.6 IN. 27.0 IN. 1.55283 ) 30.25 FT 19.25 FT 4
INPUT DATA
SLAB BOUNDARY CONDITIONS
LENGTH OF SHORT SIDE,
LENGTH OF LONG SIDE,
THICKNESS OF SLAB,
DISTRIBUTED LIVE LOAD,
DISTRIBUTED ADDITIONAL DEAD LOAD,
OUTPUT DATA
NEGATIVE MOMENT SHORT SIDE
NEGATIVE MOMENT LONG SIDE
POSITIVE MOMENT SHORT SIDE
POSITIVE MOMENT LONG SIDE
REACTION
SHORT SIDE
REACTION
LONG SIDE
30
MIN 0.47334 KIP/FT 1.44375 KIP/FT
SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE TOTAL LOAD =
SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE DEAD LOAD =
0.34712 KIP/FT
0.12623 KIP/FT
1.05875 KIP/FT
0.38500 KIP/FT
SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE LIVE LOAD =
LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE TOTAL LOAD =
1.86441 KIP/FT 1.36723 KIP/FT 0.49718 KIP/FT
LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE DEAD LOAD =
LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE LIVE LOAD =
31
CASE 1
..................................... : : SHORT SIDE : ^ : | : | : | : --------> : LONG SIDE : :................................... : : : : : : : : : :
. DENOTES SIMPLY SUPPORTED * DENOTES CONTINUOUS ENDS

32
CASE 2
******************* * * SHORT SIDE * ^ * | * | * |
* * * * * *
* * *
--------> LONG SIDE
* *
*******************
. DENOTES SIMPLY SUPPORTED * DENOTES CONTINUOUS ENDS

33
CASE 4
..................................... * * SHORT SIDE * ^ * | * | * | * -------->
: : : : : : : : : * * * ******************* . DENOTES SIMPLY SUPPORTED * DENOTES CONTINUOUS ENDS
LONG SIDE
34
CAPTULO 9 - SISTEMAS LOSA-COLUMNA
9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 9.8 9.9
GENERAL DEFINICIN DE LAS CARGAS DE DISEO REQUISITOS DIMENSIONALES DETALLES DEL REFUERZO RESISTENCIA A CORTANTE EN LOSAS DEL SISTEMA LOSA-COLUMNA ESPESOR MNIMO DE LOSA REQUERIDO POR PUNZONAMIENTO ESPESOR MNIMO DE LOSA REQUERIDO POR CORTANTE SIMPLE REQUISITOS A FLEXIN CLCULO DE LA REACCIN EN LOS APOYOS
35
9.2.1 - Cargas a incluir
Cargas muertas: peso propio de las losas, elementos no estructurales (horizontales y verticales) y equipos fijos si los hay. Cargas vivas. Si la losa es parte del sistema de cubierta, se deben emplear los valores apropiados de carga viva en cubiertas, cargas por lluvia y nieve.
36
9.3.2 - Franja de columnas 9.3.3 - Franja central
37
9.3.8 - Requisitos especiales
Debe haber un mnimo de tres luces continuas en cada direccin. Los paneles deben ser rectangulares, con una relacin mxima entre lado mayor y lado menor de 2, medida entre los centros de los apoyos del panel. La longitud de vanos sucesivos no debe ser menor del 80 por ciento de la luz adyacente mayor, medida entre centros de los apoyos Se permite el desplazamiento de columnas con respecto a su eje hasta un mximo del 10 por ciento de la longitud del vano en la direccin del desplazamiento. Todas las cargas empleadas se deben nicamente a la gravedad y estn uniformemente distribuidas sobre todo el panel.
La carga viva unitaria no mayorada, q", no debe exceder dos veces la carga
muerta unitaria no mayorada, qd.
38
9.3.9.3 - Aberturas en franjas de columnas.
39
9.4 - DETALLES DEL REFUERZO
El rea del refuerzo de la losa en cada direccin en los sistemas losacolumna se obtiene para los momentos en las secciones crticas, pero no debe ser menor que el requerido por retraccin de fraguado y temperatura en 7.3.3. El refuerzo a flexin debe cumplir con los requisitos de 7.3. Para la losa superior localizada sobre las celdas en los sistemas de losa aligerada en dos direcciones (reticular celulado), el refuerzo debe cumplir con los requisitos de 7.5. Las viguetas en el sistema de reticular celulado deben cumplir con los requisitos generales de refuerzo a flexin de 8.4 y refuerzo transversal de 8.5. El refuerzo en las viguetas del sistema reticular celulado debe cumplir los requisitos de 8.6.5 para viguetas en la franja central y de 8.7.5 para viguetas en la franja de columnas. El refuerzo en el reticular celulado no necesita cumplir con los requisitos de 9.4.2 a 9.4.4.
40
9.4.3.6 - Puntos de suspensin.
41
9.5.4.3 - Resistencia de diseo a cortante en dos direcciones (punzonamiento).
42
9.5.5 - Cortante simple
43
9.6 - ESPESOR MNIMO DE LOSA REQUERIDO POR PUNZONAMIENTO
44
9.6.2 - Espesor mnimo de losa por punzonamiento
Para columnas interiores
Para columnas de borde con hc paralelo al borde
Para columnas de borde con bc paralelo al borde
Para columnas de esquina
9.7.3 - Espesor mnimo de losa requerido por cortante simple
46
La losa se divide en ambas direcciones en franjas de diseo. Cada franja incluye un eje de columna o apoyo y est delimitada por un eje central de panel a cada lado. Cuando la franja es adyacente y paralela a un borde, debe incluir el eje de la columna o apoyo de borde y est delimitada por el borde de la losa en un lado y el eje del panel al otro lado. Para todos los vanos, en todas las franjas en ambas direcciones, el momento esttico total mayorado se debe evaluar usando.8.1.2 . Para cada vano, el momento esttico total mayorado se debe distribuir entre momento positivo y momento negativo empleando los requisitos de 9.8.1.3 . Los momentos positivos y negativos obtenidos en 9.8.1.3 se deben distribuir en la franja de columnas usando los requisitos de 9.8.1.4 y en las dos mitades laterales de franjas centrales usando los requisitos de 9.8.1.5 .
47
9.8.1.2 - Momento esttico total mayorado para una luz.
Donde las luces transversales de los paneles a cada lado del eje de columnas sean diferentes, "2 en la Ecuacin (9-10) se debe tomar como el promedio de las luces adyacentes. Cuando la luz es adyacente y paralela a un borde, la distancia desde el borde hasta el centro del panel debe ser sustituida por "2 en la Ecuacin (9-10).
La luz libre "n corresponde a la distancia entre caras de columnas, capiteles o muros.
El valor de "n usado en la Ecuacin (9-10) no debe ser menor que 0.65"1. Los apoyos circulares o con forma de polgono regular deben ser tratados como apoyos rectangulares de la misma rea. Se permite una redistribucin de no ms del 10 por ciento de los momentos mayorados positivos y negativos siempre y cuando la suma permanezca igual.
49
50
51
9.8.1.8 - Transferencia del momento no balanceado a travs de la losa hasta el apoyo.
La transferencia del momento no balanceado por flexin se desarrolla dentro de un ancho efectivo de losa comprendido entre las lneas que estn a una y media veces el espesor de la losa o capitel (1.5h) por de las caras laterales de la columna o capitel. Para resistir el momento en ese ancho efectivo de losa se puede usar el refuerzo negativo de la franja de columna concentrndolo mediante menor separacin o colocando refuerzo adicional. La cuanta del refuerzo negativo en la zona de transferencia no debe exceder 3/4 de la cuanta mxima max dada en 7.3.4.3. El aumento de en la fuerza cortante de punzonamiento que acta en la losa se debe evaluar empleando el procedimiento de 9.5.4.4.
52
ACI 318-08 EMPIRICAL METHODS
53
Effective Beam Section
54
Reinforcement notes
According to 13.3.6, top and bottom reinforcement must be provided at the exterior corners of slabs supported by edge walls or where one or more edge beams have a value of f greater than 1.0. The corner reinforcement in both top and bottom of slab must be designed for a moment equal to the largest positive moment per unit width in the slab panel, and must be placed in a band parallel to the diagonal in the top of the slab and a band perpendicular to the diagonal in the bottom of the slab (Fig. 18-7 (a)); alternatively, it may be placed in two layers parallel to the edges of the slab in both the top and bottom of the slab (Fig. 18-7 (b)). Additionally, the corner reinforcement must extend at least one-fifth of the longer span in each direction from the corner.
55
Reinforcement notes
In slabs without beams, all bottom bars in the column strip shall be continuous or spliced with class A splices or with mechanical or welded splices satisfying 12.14.3 (13.3.8.5) to provide some capacity for the slab to span to an adjacent support in the event a single support is damaged. Additionally, at least two of these continuous bottom bars shall pass through the region bounded by the longitudinal reinforcement of the column and must be anchored at exterior supports.
56
Reinforcement notes
In lift-slab construction and slabs with shearhead reinforcement, clearance may be inadequate and it may not be practical to pass the column strip bottom reinforcing bars through the column. In these cases, two continuous bonded bottom bars in each direction shall pass as close to the column as possible through holes in the shearhead arms or, in the case of lift-slab construction, within the lifting collar (13.3.8.6)
57
13.4 OPENINGS IN SLAB SYSTEMS
The code permits openings of any size in any slab system, provided that an analysis is performed that demonstrates that both strength and serviceability requirements are satisfi ed (13.4.1). For slabs without beams; the analysis of 13.4.1 is waived when the provisions of 13.4.2.1 through 13.4.2.4 are met:
1.
2.
3.
In the area common to intersecting middle strips, openings of any size are permitted (13.4.2.1). In the area common to intersecting column strips, maximum permitted opening size is one-eighth the width of the column strip in either span (13.4.2.2). In the area common to one column strip and one middle strip, maximum permitted opening size is limited such that only a maximum of one-quarter of slab reinforcement in either strip may be interrupted (13.4.2.3).
58
Openings in Slab
59
Limitations
Both methods are for analysis under gravity loads only, and are limited in application to buildings with columns and/or walls laid out on a basically orthogonal grid, i.e., where column lines taken longitudinally and transversely through the building are mutually perpendicular. Both methods are applicable to slabs with or without beams between supports. Note that neither method applies to slab systems with beams spanning between other beams; the beams must be located along column lines and be supported by columns or other essentially non deflecting supports at the corners of the slab panels.
60
Critical Shear transfer
61
MAXIMUN COMPUTED DEFLECTION
62
Minumum Thickness
63
Minimum slab Thickness
64
Drop Panel
65
DESIGN STRIPS
66
DIRECT DESIGN METHOD
67
Direct Design Method (Simple)
In the simple frame method, each design strip is analyzed independently from the rest of the slab system using an approximate plane frame model. The stiffnesses of the slab and columns are based strictly on their cross-sectional geometry. To simplify the plane frame analysis, two approximations can be used if the actual supports are not colinear.
Actual frame can be modeled as a plane frame with span lengths equal to the centerline distance between supports. Tributary widths that vary within the span can be conservatively approximated with constant widths.
68
R13.6 Direct design method
The direct design method consists of a set of rules for distributing moments to slab and beam sections to satisfy safety requirements and most serviceability requirements simultaneously. Three fundamental steps are involved as follows:
1. Determination of the total factored static moment (see 13.6.2); 2. Distribution of the total factored static moment to negative and positive sections (see 13.6.3); 3. Distribution of the negative and positive factored moments to the column and middle strips and to the beams, if any (see 13.6.4 through 13.6.6). The distribution of moments to column and middle strips is also used in the equivalent frame method (see 13.7).
69
Direct Design Method Limitations
1. 2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
There must be three or more continuous spans in each direction; Slab panels must be rectangular with a ratio of longer to shorter span (centerline-to-centerline of supports) not greater than 2; Successive span lengths (centerline-to-centerline of supports) in each direction must not differ by more than 1/3 of the longer span; Columns must not be offset more than 10% of the span (in direction of offset) from either axis between centerlines of successive columns; Loads must be uniformly distributed, with the unfactored or service live load not more than 2 times the unfactored or service dead load (L/D 2); For two-way beam-supported slabs, relative stiffness of beams in two perpendicular directions must satisfy the minimum and maximum requirements given in 13.6.1.6; and Redistribution of negative moments by 8.4 is not permitted.
70
71
72
73
EQUIVALENT FRAME METHOD
74
Equivalent Frame Method
The equivalent frame method is based on essentially the same concept as the simple frame method, with one significant difference. Using an ACI 318 recommended procedure, the relative stiffness between the column and the slab is modified to simulate the two-way action of a column supported slab that is otherwise lost in the plane frame modeling. The equivalent frame method generally results in reduced support moments, at the expense of an increase in midspan values, when compared to the simple frame method. This is a great advantage in post-tensioned slabs, where equal moment capacities are generally available over the supports and at midspan as a result of the continuous tendons. This can lead to more economical designs.
75
R13.7.2 Equivalent frame
Application of the equivalent frame to a regular structure is illustrated in Fig. R13.7.2. The threedimensional building is divided into a series of two-dimensional frame bents (equivalent frames) centered on column or support Centerlines with each frame extending the full height of the building. The width of each equivalent frame is bounded by the centerlines of the adjacent panels. The complete analysis of a slab system for a building consists of analyzing a series of equivalent (interior and exterior) frames spanning longitudinally and transversely through the building.
76
The equivalent frame comprises three parts:
1. the horizontal slab strip, including any beams spanning in the direction of the frame, 2. the columns or other vertical supporting members, extending above and below the slab, and 3. the elements of the structure that provide moment transfer between the horizontal and vertical members.
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
USE OF FINITE ELEMENT MODELS
85
FEA
The advent of computers and automation has had a major impact on the way engineers design buildings and prepare construction documents. Because they are much simpler to model, materials used in skeletal framing systems, especially steel, have seen the greatest benefit from automated design software. A major obstacle to similar automated design of concrete buildings is the structural modeling and treatment of floor slabs. This problem is exacerbated by the introduction of posttensioning, especially when beamless floor systems (flat slabs) are used.
86
FEA
In the finite element method, the floor system is subdivided into discrete elements. Unlike the frame methods, the entire floor is analyzed at one time to obtain an overall solution. However, just like in the frame methods, the total forces must be obtained for the design strips and design sections so that code requirements for strength and serviceability can be checked and the reinforcement can be properly distributed. However, the design strips do not need to be selected until after the analysis is completed.
87
Stiffness Reduction
88
89
90
91
92
93
4X8
94
4 X 8 - MX
95
4 X 8 - MY
96
SUB 1
97
SUB 1 - MY
98
SUB 1 - MX
99
SUB 2
LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES 100
SUB 2 - MY
SUB 2 - MX
APARTAMENTO
APARTAMENTO - MY
APARTAMENTO - MX
APARTAMENTO - DEFORMACIONES
APARTAMENTO 2
APARTAMENTO 2 - MX
APARTAMENTO 2 - MY
APARTAMENTO 2 - DEFORMACIONES
Popular Programs
SAFE
Computers & Structures, http://www.csiberkeley.com/SAFE
RISA FLOOR
http://www.risatech.com/p_risafloor.html
PCA SLAB
http://www.structurepoint.org/soft
METHOD COMPARISONS
Much of the design procedure is the same regardless of whether finite element or frame methods are used. The final goal of determining the reinforcement necessary depends on the determination of the proper design values for each design section along the load path. In the frame methods, these values are obtained directly. In the finite element method, there is generally much more information produced than is strictly necessary for design.
METHOD COMPARISONS
The processing of this large amount of information to obtain the design forces is one of the challenges of using this method. However, it does have the advantage that greater economy in design is achieved when the calculated design values are closer to the elastic response of the floor slab. When the support layout of a floor system is irregular, finite element analysis has the potential of leading to a more economical design and more appropriate structural detailing because it allows the load paths to be selected after the flow of forces can be visualized.
METHOD COMPARISONS
The greatest, but not yet fully tapped, potential for the finite element method is to fully automate the design of concrete floor slabs. For conventionally reinforced floors, current stateof-the-art software is close to full auto-mation. For post-tensioned floor systems, however, full automation is further away. As noted previously, the reason lies in the need for additional input information from the designer prior to the initiation of the analysis.
FIN
LOSAS EN DOS 5 11 DIRECCIONES 115

02.-DISEÑO DE LOSAS ESTRUCTURALES EN DOS DIRECCIONES. - Ing. Jose - Izquierdo.

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

02.-DISEÑO DE LOSAS ESTRUCTURALES EN DOS DIRECCIONES. - Ing. Jose - Izquierdo.

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DISEO DE LOSAS ESTRUCTURALES EN DOS DIRECCIONES

Ing. Jos Miguel Izquierdo Encarnacin, BSCE, MCE, FACI

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

USO DE MTODO DE ELEMENTOS FINITOS PARA ANLISIS DEFORMACIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

TIPOS DE SISTEMAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

ANLISIS Y DISEO SIMPLIFICADO

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

Todo en un slo documento!

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.3.3 - Refuerzo por retraccin y temperatura

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.3.4 - Refuerzo a flexin

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.3.4 - Refuerzo a flexin

Resistencia nominal a flexin

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.3.4.3 - rea mxima de refuerzo a tensin por flexin.

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.3.8.2 - Refuerzo inferior de esquina.

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.6.3.4 - Refuerzo de voladizos en dos direcciones.

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.1 - Requisitos dimensionales

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.2 - Resistencia requerida a flexin

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.2 - Resistencia requerida a flexin

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.2 - Resistencia requerida a flexin

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7. Losas macizas en dos direcciones

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7. Losas macizas en dos direcciones

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7. Losas macizas en dos direcciones

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7. Losas macizas en dos direcciones

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.3.2 - Refuerzo a flexin

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.4 - Verificacin de resistencia a cortante

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

7.9.4 - Verificacin de resistencia a cortante

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

AC ENGINEERING SOFTWARE TWO WAY CONCRETE SLAB DESIGN PORTICUS

FOR SLAB BOUNDARY CONDITION INPUT CASE TYPE, FOR EXAMPLE 4

DISTRIBUTED ADDITIONAL DEAD LOAD,

-ULTIMATE VALUES10.62 KIP-FT

NEGATIVE MOMENT LONG SIDE POSITIVE MOMENT SHORT SIDE

SHORT BEAM REACTION SERVICE TOTAL LOAD =

LONG BEAM REACTION SERVICE TOTAL LOAD =

1.86441 KIP/FT 1.36723 KIP/FT 0.49718 KIP/FT

LOSAS EN DOS DIRECCIONES

AC ENGINEERING SOFTWARE PROGRAMMED FOR

TWO WAY CONCRETE SLAB DESIGN

FOR SLAB BOUNDARY CONDITION INPUT CASE