BASIC D·ESIGN CONCEPTS FO·R URBAN STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

. .

S D Chawathe Hon. Director (Technical) Indian ·Water Works Association

.

tal

11

he dc,' en of a storm drainage '~,sre n by the ational ~ hod · ,'>01 'e ,"epea,'" ,""us' oftbe ec uati 0 " e
a

I.

COEFFICIENT OFRUN OFF

• As Per CPHEEO Ma,nual 0.7 to, 0.9 Commercial Area Residential Area High density 0.6 to 0.75 0.35 to 0.6 Low density 0.1 to 0'.2 Parks and Undeveloped

cor: eee'T = __ , __

I' -I_~ (

2)

MUM BA I (S.
TD

D. CHAWATHE ET AL)
R.B

A~

r:n Pericd
{Y'sars

.. 5 2
"j}

6.02.00 Du "a ion (hrs)

AH M E DABAD
·_1

(S. D. CHAWATHE)

3660 FREQ -'" 0.6338

----------------------( DU R + 42.32) "'''' 1.3054 1524.3 FREQ

**

·_1

'0.3203

-----------------------( DUR + 29.69 ) "'* 0.9531 1005.6 FREQ "'''' 0.2514

3 TO 3.75 YRS
·_1

------------------------

i IN M MI HR., DU,R IN MIN

( DUR, + 1'8.67 ) "'''' 0.8374 ., FREQ IN MONTHS.

PUNE
1 TO 1 .7.5 YRS i 2 TO 2.75 YRS i3 TO 3.75 YRS 5425

(S.D.CHAWAT·HE)
FREQ 1;1; :0.4837
-------------------

= --------------

,IN M M/HR

( OUR + 33.44)1;1; 1.4019 107840 FREQ 1;1; .564 0 - --- -- --- --- -- --- --- -- --- --- ---R + 69.08) 1r1r 2.0029

- -(-OU

OUR IN MIN.

135140 FREQ 1;1;,0.6036

I

(-D-U-R--~-7g~96--)-:~-2~O-695--1761900
FREQ 1;1; .6709 0
------

FREQ IN MONTHS

4 TO 5 YRS
I

-(-DUR-:-1-15.58)-~:-;~55-

K 0 L KA T A
T

(PROF. V. RAMAN ET AL)

6200 T 1;1;, 0.358

= 1 TO

3 MONTHS
1=

( t +45 ) 1;1:1 .75 T

= 1 TO 2 YRS
1=

9 5 3 T 1;1;0.1 57
( t + 45 ) 1;1;1.34

= 5 TO

20 YRS
1=

290T1;1;0.119

( t + 45 ) 1;1;1.05

= 1 MONTH

TO 20 YRS
1

= ---- -- --- --- -- --- --- -- --- --- -- ( t + 45 ) 1;1; 1.31'

81 0 T 1;1;0 .126

NEW DELHI, (TOSHNIWALC.

T= 1 YR 2.291 X

T.)

10** 6

1=

--------------------( t + 188.85 ) ** 6.848 '0·.'0004174(t -99.28} ** 2 0.0001' 177( t -181.9) ** 2 0.0003165(~ - 129. t8) ** ~ 0.0004692( t - 119.94)**' 2 0.0002755 ( t - 1,4,9) ** 2

ALSO

T~ 1 YR T = 2'YR T= 3YR T :::,4 YR T = 5Y,R

· 1= · 1= · 1= · 1= · 1=

AM RAV A T I (DR TATEWAR ET

AL)

I'

freq en lof (10 UITfll' ein

'"f

BANGALORE

(P. KHAGESHAN)

iii

the

RAINFALL RELATIONSHIPS AS ,PER CP,HEEO MANUAL

a
1_•

a OR
•

-----------t+b

= ---------------

Where i is the intensity of rainfall mm/hr, t is the duration of storm in minutes, And a, b, and n are constants.

CPHEEO MANUAL
Type of Area Residential Peripheral Central (high value) Commercial Twice in a year Once in a year Once in 2 years Frequency

ASCEMANUALNo
Type of Area Residential Commercial ·(High value)

37

Frequency

Once in 2 to 15 years
Once in 10 to 15 Years

BRI MSTOWAD SAYS

To design the drai nag e system for 1 in 1 year storm a considerab Ie increase in capacity is required and this results in drains of substantially larger dimensions and a large increase in the 'number . .' 'of drains to be replaced or augme nted There is 37 % increase in expenditure for catchment 129. This' clearly indicates that designing for the increased' level of :service is no where justified.

BRI MSTOWAD SAYS

AS DISCUSSED THE COST OF DESI'GNING FOR ,STORMS OF GREATER INTENSI,TY THAN A 2 IN 1 YEAR EVENT IS NOT JUSTIFIED. IT IS .THEREFORE P'ROPOSED, TO CONSTRUCT WORKS TO, A .. . . DASIGN CAPACITY TO ONLY COPE UP WITH A 2 IN 1 YEAR EVENT.
, "

BRIMSTOWAD

DESIGNS FOR lWlCE IN A YEAR ST,ORM

'BRIMSTOWAD JUSTIFIES TWICE IN A·YEAR FREQUENCY· FOR STORMS IN DESIGN. 26/7 EXPERIENCE HAS TAUGHT . US TO, REVIEW THIS ASPECT . . AND ADOPT FREQUE·NCIES SUCH AS SAY ONCE IN TEN . . YEARS FOR DESIGN.

DR. CHITALE REPORT SAYS

• IT WILL BE ,ADEQUATE IF MUMBAI~S STORM . WATER . SYSTEMS ARE BASICALLY DESIGNED FOR THE FOLLOWING HOURLY INTENSITIES OF PRECI PTATION
,

• SMALL CATCHMENTS:

50mm/hr~

2 IN ONE YEAR

FREQUEN.CY VIDE BRIMSTOWAD RIVER CHANNEL AREAS ~ 70 mm/hr ~ 1 IN 10 YEAR F,REQUENCY

BRI MSTAWAD SAYS

C'RITERIA FOR LOCAL AREA DRAINAGE SYSTEM

This Report, providing proposal's to M',aster Plan and Preliminary Engineering, does not cover the detailed investiqation and proposals for local drainage systems. The proposals contained in subsequent 'sections are the result of ana lysis of the major network' and give in 0 utli ne the requ ireme nts fo alleviate the major causes of flooding. As with any analysis on' this scale, not all branches were considered.

BRIMSTOWAD DOES N·OT COVER LOCAL STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

THE STORM WATER DRAINAGE SYSTEM CAN BE DIVIDED INTO TWO SUBSYSTEMS. LOCAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM COVERING SMALL IMEDIUM/LARGE ,ROADS AND SMALL NALLAS FORM, THE UP-STREAM SUB SYSTEM A,ND MEDI UM I LAR GE NALLAS/R IVERS FOR M THE DOWNS- TREAM SUB-SYSTEM. MOST OF THE AREA OF MUMBAI FORMS THE CATCHMENT AREA FOR THE· LOCAL O'RAINAGE SUB SYSTEM. SINCE THE UP-STREAM SUB-SYSTEM' ,INITIALLY COLLECTS STORM WATER RUN-OFF AND SUBSEQUENTLY PASSES THE SAME TO THE DOWN-STREAM SUB-SYSTEM IT IS NECESSARY TO 'DESIGN' IT PROPERLY AND IDENTIFY CoONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS FOR THE SAME.
I

BRI·MSTO.WAD DO.ES NOT COVER THESE PROPOSALS.

RECOM MENDATIONS
• DESIGN / PROPOSA.LS SHOULD BE PREPARED FOR INTENSITIES OF STO'RMS FOR ,A FREQUENCY OF 'OCCURRENCE OF 'SAY ONCE IN TEN YEARS. • DESIGN/PR:OPOSALS SHO'ULD BE ADDED FOR LOCAL STORM WATER 'DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (SMALL/MEDIUM/LARGE ROADS ~SMAL'L NALLAS WITH CONCENTRA,TION TIME 10 MIN. TO '60 MIN.) • USE RAINFALL INTEN'SITY- DURAT'IONFREQURENCY RELATIONSHIPS DEVLOPED BY CHAWAT,HE ,ET AL FOR DESIGNING LOCAL STORM WATER DRAINAGE S'YST,EM
, ,

SUGGESTED DESIGN NORMS

2[0"
~]

"

'

120

3 4 Sma Nallas 45 95

THANK

YOU