Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PORTFORLIO
Week 4
Lecture 4: Survey research
A. Introduction
1. Definition:
A survey research is a study of a large group through direct study of a
subset of that group. Surveys are widely used to gather data at a particular
point in time to:
Describe the nature of existing conditions
Identify standards against which existing conditions can be compared
Determine the relationships that exist between specific events
2. Purpose of survey research
Survey research is conducted to learn about characteristics of an entire
group interest (a population) by examining a subset of that group (a
sample).
(Johnson, 1992:113)
3. Methods of collecting data
• Questionnaires
• Interviews
• Direct observation
(Johnson, 1992:104)
4. Main steps of doing a survey research
• Determining the purpose of the study
• Stating the research questions
• Specifying population and drawing a sample
• Deciding methods of data collection
• Developing instruments.
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B
• Collecting data
• Analyzing data
• Addressing non-response
B. Sample research
Title: Students’ and teachers’ use of and attitudes’ to L1 in the
EFL classroom
Author: Yuri Kim, Renaissance International school in HCMC,
Vietnam
Eleni Petraki, University of Canberra, Australia.
Source: Asian EFL Journal
The research questions are stated very clearly:
- What are the NEST and non NEST teachers’ views on the appropriate use
of L1 in the classroom and its perceived contribution to the students’
learning?
- What are the EFL learners’ opinions about the appropriate use of L1 in
the classroom and its perceived contribution to their learning?
- Are there any similarities and differences between those opinions?
- What are the EFL teachers’ and students‘ opinions about the use of L1 in
the 4 macro-skills and three different English proficiency levels?
The context the survey was conducted: in EFL classrooms at a Korean
school in Vietnam.
How the population was defined: A Korean school in Vietnam with mixed
ability students and multilingual backgrounds and other school confronting
similar dilemmas. A sample is 6 Native English Speaking Teachers
(NESTs) and 6 Korean native speakers (Non-NESTs) and 30 secondary
students from 3 different levels, each level represented by 10 students (for
questionnaires). For the interviews, 6 teachers and 9 students were
interviewed which were chosen randomly.
The sampling procedures used: Samples were randomly selected.
The procedures used to collect data:
Questionnaires: two different versions: the teacher version and the student
version. They included a variety of questions that were open-ended,
yes/no, ranked, multiple-choice, scaled and short answer questions.
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B
The results and the conclusions drawn: L1 plays a supportive role in the
language classroom, especially in the early stages, and more significantly in
reading and writing. A bigger sample of students and teachers could be
employed in the future. It is also important to acknowledge the influence of
the Vietnamese learning environment and other L3 linguistic and cultural
environments the Korean learners have been exposed to, on their preference
for L1 use.
What are the stated implications?
First, students, teachers and administrators should work collaboratively
towards the improvement of the curriculum and teaching. Research into
students‘ and teachers‘ attitudes in every school can contribute to
everyone‘s awareness and can assist in identifying a consistent approach to
L1 use. This research has uncovered a need for cooperation between NESTs
and Non-NESTs. The evidence shows that L1 use can be useful especially
for beginner levels and in general for reading tasks. An English-only policy
is more useful when employed in the upper levels where the percentage of
English used by both teachers and students is high. Both Non-NESTs and
NESTs should work closely together on teaching strategies and policies that
will lead to students‘ effective learning. They should also be actively
involved in the decision making about a policy that is appropriate for each
school.
As Non NESTs were found to lack confidence in language proficiency,
which led to their 75 increased and inappropriate L1 use, seminars should
be offered to improve their confidence and promote L2 use among the
teachers. Effective collaboration between Non-NESTs and NESTs can also
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B
C. Questionnaire
1. What is a questionnaire?
Questionnaires are any written instruments that present
respondents with a series of questions or statements to which
they are to react either by writing out their answers or
selecting from among existing answers.
(Brown, 2001)
A questionnaire is a research instrument consisting of a
series of questions and other prompts for the purpose of
gathering information from respondents.
(Wikipedia)
2. Types of questions:
2.1. Open - ended questions
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B
PORTFORLIO
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B
Week 5
Lecture 5: Case Study
A. Introduction
1. What is case study?
A case:
- A unit of analysis: a learner, a teacher, a class, a school, an agency, an
institution etc.
- A single entity usually exists in its naturally occurring environment
Case study: the study of one case
2. Definitions of case study
• A case study is an exploration of a "bounded system" or a case over
time through detailed, in-depth data collection involving multiple sources
of information rich in context.
http://labweb.education.wisc.edu/cni916/def_case.htm.
A case study is a collection and presentation of detailed information about a
particular participant or small group, frequently including the accounts of
subjects themselves.
http://writing.colostate.edu/references/research/glossary/index.cfm
#case_study
A case study is a study of a ‘bounded system’ emphasizing the unity and
wholeness of that system, but confiding the attention to those aspects that
are relevant to the research problem at the time
(Stake 1988)
A case study is a study which focuses holistically on an entity
(Johnson 1992)
3. Uses of cases study
Case study may be used to investigate:
Learning of a second or foreign language
Coping with academic content in second/foreign language (academic
listening experiences of ESL Ss in university courses)
Scaffolding, problem solving and second/foreign language learning (L2
learning and content learning interact younger students)
Second/foreign language writing
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B
Reading strategies
Adult literacy
Modifying input strategies (teachers in their classroom
interaction)
4. Main characteristics
Collecting data about a specific individual, object ,or group
Using multiple sources of evidence
- Including account from the subjects themselves.
Studying events and subjects from real-life contexts.
Drawing conclusions about the research and limits them to the subject(s)
with the defined context only.
Seeking to understand complex phenomena from the participant's point of
view.
Seeking answer to questions of how and why, instead of who, what, where,
how much, and how many.
7. Methodology
Five key issues:
Initial problem formulation
Defining the unit of study and its boundries
Data collection techniques and reseacher role
Analysis – the search for patterns
Communicating the experience in a report
B. Sample research
1. Question/hypothesis:
- How do summer language camp experiences influence the conversational
English of Chinese students (ranging from 8-18 years of age)?
- How are the summer camp experiences different from the traditional
school experience for Chinese students (ranging from 8-18 years of age)?
- What are the most beneficial aspects of the camp for students and teachers
and what are the least beneficial aspects of the camp for students and
teachers?
2. Context:
- Real life context – China (boundaries): English language learners
largest concentrated worldwide; expose to the global marketplace
=>policies to expand the use of English at the grassroots level and
educational changes
- Summer camp context
3. Subjects: 149 Chinese students aged 8-18 (69 males, 80 females); 10
teachers from the U.S. and 10 local Chinese teachers; 24 teaching
assistants from the USA.
4. Procedures:
- Survey
- Semi-structured interview
5. Conclusions:
- Informal means of instruction:
+ Most helpful in facilitating improvement in their spoken English
+ Contrast markedly with typical one in traditional language classrooms
in China (grammar-based curriculum)
- The summer camp affords teachers and students the opportunity to
focus almost exclusively on interactive use of English.
- Provide a unique opportunity for participants to use English for
authentic purposes
Students not resistant to interactive language instruction
Lê Thị Vân Nga _Group 18B