Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
When
you
do
something
wrong,
promptly
admit
it.
You
will
be
glad
you
did.
This
article
gives
examples
of
people
who
did
wrong
or
are
accused
of
doing
wrong.
It
shows
the
consequences
of
admitting
and
denying
alleged
wrong-doing.
Everyone
makes
mistakes.
Everyone
hurts
others.
Here
are
suggestions
about
what
to
do
about
it.
Jane
F.
Gilgun,
Ph.D.,
LICSW,
is
a
professor,
School
of
Social
Work,
University
of
Minnesota,
Twin
Cities,
USA.
Her
research
on
the
meanings
of
violence
to
perpetrators
has
led
her
to
a
long-‐term
interest
in
accountability.
The
roots
of
unkind
deeds
are
beliefs
we
absorb
through
years
of
being
exposed
to
them.
Fortunately,
most
of
our
beliefs
guide
us
in
good
directions.
Some
of
our
beliefs
hurt
others
and
ourselves
when
we
act
on
them.
See
Professor
Gilgun’s
other
articles,
books,
and
children’s
stories
on
Scribd.com,
Amazon
Kindle,
and
iBooks.
Did
Something
Wrong?
Admit
it
&
Take
the
Consequences
When
you
do
something
wrong,
why
not
just
admit
it,
take
the
consequences,
and
get
on
with
your
life?
Let
other
people
get
on
with
theirs?
Two
people
in
the
news
did
just
that.
One
person
said
he
did
it,
he’s
sorry,
won’t
do
it
again,
and
won’t
forget
what
he
did.
This
person
is
Joakim
Noah,
a
professional
basketball
player,
who
called
a
fan
a
“fucking
faggot”
during
a
game.
Noah
took
responsibility
for
his
misdeed.
He
got
a
lot
of
heat
for
the
slur
and
accepted
wide-‐spread
disapproval.
The
other
person
is
Molly
Wei,
19,
charged
in
crimes
related
to
the
death
of
Tyler
Clementi,
18,
a
first
year
college
student
at
Rutgers
University
in
New
Jersey,
USA.
Mr.
Clementi
committed
suicide
last
fall,
days
after
his
roommate,
Dharun
Ravi,
19,
posted
a
video
of
Mr.
Clementi
making
out
with
another
man.
Ms.
Wei
struck
a
deal
with
prosecutors.
In
exchange
for
a
guilty
plea,
300
hours
of
community
service,
successful
completion
of
counseling,
and
truthful
testimony
in
Mr.
Ravi’s
trial,
all
charges
against
her
will
be
dropped.
Ms.
Wei
faces
charges
of
invasion
of
privacy
because
Mr.
Ravi
was
in
her
room
when
he
turned
on
the
webcam
to
videotape
Mr.
Clementi
and
his
date.
Two
other
people
in
the
news
won’t
admit
what
they
did.
Under
US
law,
they
assumed
to
be
innocent
until
they
are
proved
guilty
through
trial.
In
this
article,
I
wonder
what
would
happen
if
they
did
what
they
were
charged
with
and
then
simply
admitted
it.
These
two
people
are
charged
with
crimes.
One
of
them,
the
former
head
of
the
International
Monetary
Fund
(IMF),
denied
raping
a
hotel
maid
30
years
his
junior
a
few
weeks
ago.
This
woman
is
a
political
refugee
who
has
asylum
in
the
United
States.
She
is
raising
a
15
year-‐old
daughter.
In
his
letter
of
resignation
as
director
of
the
IMF,
Dominique
Strauss-‐Kahn,
62,
denied
“with
the
greatest
possible
firmness
all
of
the
allegations.”
A
few
days
later,
his
lawyer
stated
in
court,
“The
forensic
evidence,
we
believe,
is
not
consistent
with
a
forcible
encounter.”
This
statement
implicitly
blames
the
victim.
Many
people
do.
Maybe
this
defense
will
work
for
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn.
The
other
person
who
stated
he
is
not
guilty
is
Dharun
Ravi,
19,
who
is
alleged
to
have
videotaped
his
male
roommate
making
out
with
another
man,
posted
the
video
on
the
web,
and
then
allegedly
wrote
on
Twitter,
“Roommate
asked
for
the
room
till
midnight.
I
went
into
Molly’s
room
and
turned
on
my
webcam.
I
saw
him
making
out
with
a
dude.
Yay.”
Ravi
was
having
fun.
Some
of
his
friends
thought
what
he
did
was
hilarious.
Mr.
Ravi’s
roommate.
Tyler
Clementi,
18,
jumped
to
his
death
off
the
George
Washington
Bridge
in
New
York
City
a
few
days
later.
Mr.
Clementi
is
thought
to
have
written
a
message
on
a
gay
website
the
day
before
he
committed
suicide.
He
said
he
told
a
resident
advisor
about
the
posting
of
the
video.
“I
feel
like
it
was
‘look
at
what
a
fag
my
roommate
is,’”
he
wrote.
He
said
Ravi’s
friends
showed
more
concern
about
Ravi
having
a
gay
roommate
than
about
Ravi’s
actions.
Mr.
Ravi
pled
not
guilty
yesterday
in
a
Manhattan
court
to
15
counts
of
criminal
behavior.
These
counts
included
bias
crimes,
tampering
with
witnesses,
and
tampering
with
evidence.
Besides
the
spying,
the
posting,
the
bragging,
and
in
general
having
a
great
time,
Mr.
Ravi
afterward
tried
to
erase
his
Twitter
message
and
asked
witnesses
to
change
their
stories.
Consequences
As
Mr.
Clementi
said,
actions
have
consequences.
This
is
what
has
resulted
from
the
actions
of
these
four
people.
Mr.
Noah
The
National
Basketball
Association
(NBA)
fined
Mr.
Noah
$50,000
for
the
use
of
“a
derogatory
and
offensive
term.”
Mr.
Noah
said,
“With
the
comment
to
the
fan,
I
just
want
to
apologize
for
that.
I
had
just
picked
up
my
second
foul.
I
was
frustrated.
He
said
something
that
was
disrespectful
toward
me,
and
I
lost
my
cool.
People
who
know
me
know
I’m
an
open-‐minded
guy.
I’m
not
here
to
hurt
anybody’s
feelings.”
People
across
the
United
States
had
a
lot
to
say
about
Mr.
Noah’s
use
of
a
slur
against
gay
people.
For
instance,
the
president
of
the
Human
Rights
Campaign
said,
“We
need
to
get
to
the
point
where
you
don’t
use
an
antigay
slur
to
respond
to
events.”
A
spokesperson
for
the
Gay
and
Lesbian
Alliance
Against
Defamation
said,
“Last
month,
the
NBA
sent
an
important
message
about
how
such
slurs
fuel
a
climate
of
intolerance
and
are
unacceptable.”
Last
month
the
NBA
fined
Kobe
Bryant,
another
basketball
player,
$100,000
for
using
the
same
slur
against
a
referee.
Mr.
Noah
seems
sincere
in
his
apology.
His
subsequent
actions
will
show
whether
he
has
learned
to
root
out
antigay
attitudes
that
he
and
many
others
have
encoded
in
their
brains.
Few
people
do
not.
We
are
exposed
over
our
lifetimes
to
antigay
beliefs.
Mr.
Ravi
Mr.
Ravi
faces
months
if
not
years
of
ordeal
that
includes
public
scrutiny
and
disgrace.
He
could
easily
improve
his
reputation
and,
more
importantly,
his
self
respect,
if
he
admitted
what
he
did
was
wrong
and
took
the
consequences,
if
he
did
break
laws.
Judges
look
favorably
upon
defendants
who
do
this.
Mr.
Ravi
could
serve
some
jail
time
and
then
probation.
Other
people
will
respect
that
he
made
some
terrible
mistakes,
but
he
has
also
understood
the
gravity
of
what
he
did.
He
can
make
up
for
his
misdeeds
through
living
an
exemplary
life.
Admitting
what
he
did
was
wrong
might
also
relieve
some
of
the
loss
and
suffering
that
he
has
caused
Mr.
Clementi’s
parents,
other
family
members,
and
friends.
Instead,
Mr.
Ravi
has
chosen
to
fight
the
charges,
continue
to
damage
his
reputation
and
self-‐respect,
and
risk
being
found
guilty
and
then
sentenced
to
years
in
prison.
He
has
chosen
yet
another
self-‐destructive
path.
Amusing
himself
at
Mr.
Clementi’s
expense,
while
destructive
to
others,
ultimately
was
destructive
to
himself.
Mr.
Strauss-Kahn
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
has
experienced
world-‐wide
disgrace
and
loss
of
a
high
profile
job,
although
many
people
in
his
native
France
believe
his
defense
and
think
his
political
enemies
set
him
up.
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
was
a
probable
candidate
for
president
of
France.
His
great
job
is
over
and
his
influential
future
may
be
in
doubt.
Had
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
admitted
what
he
had
done
(if
the
charges
are
correct,
although
he
remains
innocent
under
the
law),
the
headlines
would
not
roll
out
every
day.
He
would
not
have
been
photographed
in
handcuffs
with
his
head
lowered
and
his
face
in
a
scowl.
The
story
would
have
made
news,
but
it
would
be
over
by
now.
As
discussed
earlier,
judges
look
favorably
upon
defendants
who
admit
what
they
have
done.
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
may
have
served
minimal
jail
time
and
probation.
He
would
have
earned
the
respect
of
others.
“I
made
a
mistake,”
he
could
have
said.
“I
am
sorry.
I
will
do
whatever
I
can
to
make
up
for
what
I
did.
I
lost
my
head.”
He
also
could
have
admitted
that
he
thought
the
woman
was
easy
pickings.
They
were
alone
in
the
hotel
room.
He
is
far
bigger
than
her.
He
perceived
her
as
vulnerable
not
only
because
of
her
size
but
because
of
her
dark
skin
and
implicit
“social
inferiority”
as
compared
to
his
high
social
standing.
Had
he
admitted
what
he
did
(innocent
as
he
remains
under
the
law),
the
32
year-‐old
hotel
maid
might
have
felt
as
if
someone
recognized
what
she
had
gone
through,
not
only
as
a
result
of
the
sexual
aggression
she
said
she
experienced
from
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn,
but
also
as
a
refugee
from
a
worn-‐torn
country.
She
has
not
been
public
about
the
trauma
she
experienced
in
her
country
of
origin.
Because
she
is
a
political
refugee,
she
has
experienced
multiple
traumas.
Women
who
are
members
of
ethnic
minority
groups
are
at
risk
for
sexual
assault
because
of
widespread
beliefs
about
their
social
inferiority.
If
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
did
act
in
sexually
aggressive
ways,
he
may
yet
restore
the
respect
of
others
if
,
“I
acted
like
a
pig.
I
tried
to
take
advantage
of
a
situation.
I
need
to
start
thinking
differently
about
what
I
think
I’m
entitled
to.
I
have
had
a
life
of
privilege.
I
have
to
learn
to
know
when
I
take
advantage
of
people.
I
have
gotten
away
with
taking
advantage
of
others
for
a
long
time.”
I
doubt
that
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
has
suffered
any
pain
over
damage
to
his
self-‐respect.
He
could
truly
believe
he
is
not
guilty.
Ms.
Wei
Ms.
Wei
will
be
able
to
go
on
with
her
life.
She
may
realize
that
she
has
done
something
wrong.
I
hope
so.
She
may
simply
have
gone
along
with
Mr.
Ravi,
whom
she
had
known
for
several
years.
She
may
not
have
been
able
to
stand
up
to
him.
Discussion
In
the
United
States,
persons
are
presumed
innocent
until
proven
guilty.
This
is
a
bedrock
principle.
I
have
respected
this
principle
in
this
article.
I
have
also
asserted
that
taking
responsibility
for
doing
something
wrong
has
consequences
for
the
good.
I
have
provided
examples
and
language
for
what
to
do
and
say
when
we
have
done
something
wrong.
We
make
mistakes.
We
hurt
others.
The
best
course
of
action
is
to
take
responsibility,
apologize,
and
do
what
it
takes
not
to
repeat
these
hurtful
actions.
Self-‐respect
and
the
respect
of
others
result.
Like
almost
everyone
else,
Mr.
Noah
and
Mr.
Levi
have
internalized
antigay
ideologies.
In
times
of
stress,
Mr.
Bryant
and
Mr.
Levi
let
go
of
their
common
decency
and
yelled
antigay
slurs.
They
can
do
better.
Mr.
Noah
is
trying
to
live
up
to
his
own
values.
If
what
Mr.
Levi
did
is
found
to
be
true,
then
Mr.
Levi
wanted
to
have
fun.
He
did.
Had
he
thought
about
the
long-‐term
consequences
of
his
public
joke
on
Mr.
Clementi,
he
may
not
have
done
what
he
did.
Mr.
Levi
thought
only
of
himself.
He
wanted
to
bring
attention
to
himself
at
the
expense
of
others.
Mr.
Levi
is
young.
Maybe
he
will
learn
that
doing
harm
to
others
often
feels
really
good.
The
first
step
is
to
realize
that
your
actions
are
or
could
be
harmful.
Mr.
Levi
did
not
know
this
or
did
not
care.
So,
he
did
what
made
him
feel
good.
He
probably
feels
pretty
bad
now.
Taking
responsibility
for
what
he
is
thought
to
have
done
may
help
him
feel
good
again.
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn,
if
he
did
what
the
woman
said
he
did,
has
internalized
beliefs
about
what
he
is
entitled
to.
Many
men
throughout
the
world
have
a
sense
of
entitlement
to
sex,
especially
sex
with
people
others
define
as
their
social
inferiors.
Mr.
Strauss-‐Kahn
and
others
may
have
learned
that
they
do
not
have
rights
to
sex
with
others
just
because
it
is
what
they
want.
There
are
laws
in
countries
throughout
the
world
against
this.
Maybe
one
day,
more
sexually
entitled
people
will
internalize
these
laws.
As
for
Ms.
Wei,
who
pled
guilty
to
invasion
of
privacy
charges,
Joseph
Clementi,
Tyler’s
father,
said
a
few
weeks
ago,
“Ms.
Wei’s
actions,
although
unlawful,
are
substantially
different
in
their
nature
and
extent
than
the
actions
of
Tyler’s
former
roommate.”
Mr.
Clementi
had
more
to
say
about
Ms.
Wei:
“Actions
have
consequences.
We
wish
that
Ms.
Wei
will
become
a
persons
who
will
make
better
decisions,
will
help
people
and
show
kindness
to
those
she
comes
in
contact
with.”
There
is
no
way
of
knowing,
of
course,
how
Ms.
Wei
will
live
her
life.
Let’s
hope
she
has
learned
what
she
needs
to
learn
to
avoid
participating
in
something
as
hurtful
as
what
has
been
alleged.
This Publication
References
Abrams,
Johnathan
(2011).
Noah
fined
$50,000
for
using
antigay
slur.
New
York
Times,
May
24,
B13,
B17.
Gilgun,
Jane
F.
(2010).
Evil
feels
good:
Think
before
you
act.
Roots
of
Violence,
Seeds
of
Change,
1
(2)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38489251/Evil-‐Feels-‐Good-‐Think-‐Before-‐You-‐
Act
Gilgun,
Jane
F.
(2010).
On
being
a
shit:
Unkind
deeds
and
cover-‐ups
in
everyday
life.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16545438/On-‐Being-‐a-‐Shit-‐Unkind-‐Deeds-‐CoverUps-‐in-‐
Everyday-‐Life
Molly
Wei
to
testify
against
Tyler
Clementi's
roommate
Dharun
Ravi
as
part
of
plea
deal.
Star
Ledger,
Saturday,
May
07,
2011.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/05/molly_wei_defendant_in_tyler_c_1.html
Perez-‐Pena,
Richard
&
Nate
Schweber
(2011).
Roommate
is
arraigned
in
suicide
case.
New
York
Times,
May
24,
p.
A23.
Rashbaum,
William
K.
(2011).
DNA
said
to
link
ex-‐IMF
leader
and
hotel
housekeeper.
New
York
Times,
May
24,
p.
A21.