Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session 10 – Education in SA
Department of Economics
•
Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences
Aims for today
Lucky you!!
2
1) Overview of SA education system
3
SA’s dualistic school system and labour market
High productivity jobs & High quality schools
incomes • ±10% of schools, mainly ex-white,
• ±10% of labour force – mainly but racial composition changed
professional, managerial & skilled jobs • Produce strong cognitive skills
• Requires graduates, good quality
matric, or good vocational skills • Teachers well qualified, schools
• Historically mainly whites
function well, good assessment,
parents involved
0,8 (conditional)
0,7 top end of labour market – (better)
(conditional)
0,6
0,5
0,4
jobs, higher wages
0,3
0,2
• Skills shortage at top end causes a
0,1
0,0
wage premium
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Education (years)
• Oversupply of unskilled workers
4,0
depresses wages at bottom end
3,5
Log of wage, 2005 • Race between demand and supply
(conditional)
Log of wage per hour
3,0
of skills will determine skills premium
(conditional)
2,5
2,0 • This premium and the distribution of
1,5
educational attainment are currently
1,0
0,5 central to SA income inequality
0,0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Education (years)
5
Education also determines individual prospects – with a
potential vicious circle of weak education and poverty
2. Cognitive
1.SES
ability in early
at birth
childhood
6. Labour 3. Educational
market performance in
performance early school years
5. Ultimate
educational 4. Educational
attainment and achievement at
quality matric
2) South Africa’s performance in INTERNATIONAL context
7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Sing apo
re
Korea
Hong Ko
ng
Ta iwa n
Ja pan
Belg ium
Nethe rl a
nds
Austral ia
U SA
Swede n
Engl and
Sco tlan
d
Is ra el
New Ze a
lan
Slov eniad
Ita ly
Norway
Cyprus
Bahrai n
Esto nia
Hunga ry
M alay sia
Slov aki a
La tvia
Russ ia
Lith uan
ia
Armeni a
Serbi a &
M
Bulga ria.
Roma nia
M oldo
M aced o v a
nia
Le banon
Mean Maths score in TIMMS 2003 (Grade 8)
Jo rd an
Ira
Ind ones n
ia
Tun isia
Egy
Pal estinpt
e
Chile
M orocco
Phil ippin
e
Botswans
Sau di A a
rabia
SOUTH Ghana
AFRICA
0
100
200
300
400
500
Russia
Hong Kong 565
Canada:Alberta
Singapore
Canada:British …
Luxembourg
Canada:Ontario
Italy
Hungary
Sweden
Germany
Netherlands
Belgium (Flemish)
Bulgaria
Denmark
Canada:Nova …
Latvia
United States
England
Austria
Lithuania
Chinese Taipei
Canada:Quebec
New Zealand
Slovak Republic
Literacy score in PIRLS 2006
Scotland
France
Slovenia
Poland
Spain
Israel
Iceland
Moldova
Belgium (French)
500
Norway
Romania
Georgia
Macedonia
Trinidad & Tobago
Iran
Indonesia
405
Qatar
Kuwait
Morocco
South Africa
302
0
20
40
60
80
10
Hong Kong
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Belgium (Flemish)
Lithuania
Russia
Italy
Sweden
Latvia
Austria
Canada
Singapore
Hungary
Germany
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
Chinese Taipei
Denmark
United States
4 4 4
France
Bulgaria 5 6
Slovak Republic
6
Slovenia
6
Spain
England
Scotland
Poland
Iceland
in PIRLS 2006 (Gr.4; in SA Gr.5)
New Zealand
Belgium (French)
Norway
7 7 7 7 8 8 8 9
Moldova
Israel
15 16
Romania
18
Georgia
Macedonia
% below low international benchmark (400)
34 36
Iran
46
Indonesia
67
Qatar
Kuwait
72 74
Morocco
78
South Africa
% of SA students exceeding performance at 75th percentile of
developed countries
(“who would ‘make it’ economically in developed countries")
Objections to international comparison:
12
3) South Africa’s performance in REGIONAL context (SACMEQ)
13
Placing SA in regional context
Reading
10th /15
Maths
8th /15
14
Placing SA in regional context
4th /15
15
Placing SA in regional context
4th /15
14th/15 !!!
Caveat… GER?
16
Placing SA in regional context
17
Placing SA in regional context
18
Placing SA in regional context
Rural
13th /15
19
Placing SA in regional context
Urban
9th /15
20
3) Not only does SA’s school system perform poorly, it is also
highly unequal
21
Primary school: Gr.6 reading test scores by SES quintile
22
Primary school: PIRLS (Gr 5) reading scores by
school type
.005 .004
kdensity reading test score
.001 .002 0.003
24
Secondary school: Matriculants’ performance by race, 2007
70%
60%
50%
Pass Matric
40%
Maths passes
Endorsements
30%
HG Maths passes
20% A-aggregates
10%
0%
Blacks Coloureds Indians Whites Total
Secondary school
Apply critical
thinking!!
What is misleading
about this picture?
26
Two school systems? Yes, BUT...
Mathematics
score of the
95th
performance
percentile.
27
4) Just how bad are the students/teachers??
28
WCED study: % of Gr. 3 learners who could
verbally answer questions below (in home language)
100% 95% 98%
90%
80%
72% 71%
69%
70%
60%
50%
50%
30% 27%
20% 17%
10%
0%
2x2 5x5 2x3 10 x 10 2x2 3x6 2x3 4x5 2x4 6x6
But ¾ of Gr.3 teachers said they covered times tables 3+ days per week
Yet barely half of teachers were confident that most of their learners could
correctly answer “2 times 4” (Plus, this is WC!!)
What about teachers?
In SACMEQ III, Maths teachers participated in a Maths tests & English
teachers in a reading test
Example of one answer on a Maths test:
• Recent research
31
1)Methodology: Education production function
Inputs:
• student
• household PRODUCTION Output:
• community PROCESS • reading score
• classroom
• teacher
• school
?
Regression analysis → coefficients provide an indication of the
direction, size and significance of the impacts of inputs on
output.
32
Education production functions
33
2) Our studies show
34
Our studies show
• Why are these schools not functioning?
35
Our studies show
36
Overall?
38
Miscellaneous
Essays
• Finalise your topics by Friday
• I have some suggestions (though more difficult)
39