Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment No
Definition : The capacity of the sample to donate protons or the capacity of the sample in
neutralizing an alkali of known strength.
Causative Factors : Unionized portion of weekly-ionized acids (Carbonic, tannic, etc) and hydrolyzing
salts of Fe3+ and Al3+. Mineral acids to contribute to the acidity when the pH<
4.5.
Significance : Corrosiveness of the sample.
Definition :The capacity of the sample to donate ‘OH’ ions or accept ‘H+’ ions or to
neutralize an acid of known strength.
Theory : Alkalinity of water is its acid neutralizing capacity. It is the capacity of water
to donate OH+ i.e. hydrate ions or accept H+ ions or hydrogen ions. It has the
significance in many ways and treatment of neutral water and waste water.
Alkalinity measurements are used in the interpretation of water and waste
water treatment process.
Standard : Nil
Expression of the : mg/l CaCO3
Result
Titrant : N/50 of 0.02 N H2SO4
Indicator : Phenolphthalein: End Point – Red to colourless. Characteristic
of 8.3 pH.
Methyl orange: End point – Yellow to Orange. Characteristic
of 4.5 pH.
______________________________________________________________________________
Experiment No
Aim : To determine the chloride content (Avgentometric method) in the given water
samples.
Theory : Chloride in the form of chloride Cl – ions, is one of the major inorganic anions in
water and waste water. The chloride concentration is higher in the waste water than
the water because of sodium chloride ( NaCl), a common ingredient of diet and
passes unchanged through the digestive system. At the sea coast, chloride may be
present in high concentration because of leakage of salt water into the sewage system.
It may be also increased by industrial process. High chloride content may harm metal
pipes and structures as well as growing plants.
Principle : In neutral or slightly alkaline solution K2CrO4 indicates the end of silver chloride gets
quantitatively precipitated before red silver chromate is formed.
Calculation :
1000ml of 1N AgNO3 = 35.45gm Cl-
... 1 ml of 0.0141 AgNO3 = 35.45 x 0.0141mg Cl-
= 0.499mg Cl- or say 500µg Cl- or 0.5mg Cl-
Formula :
(A-B) x 0.5 x1000
-
Mg/l Cl =
ml of sample
Result : The chloride Content in the given water sample was found to be ------------ mg/l
_________________________________________________________________________________
Aim : To determine the optimum coagulant dose for the removal of maximum
turbidity (generally a residual turbidity of 20 units is preferred) .
Generally carried out with the help of Jar test Apparatus in the given water samples.
Procedure: : Take 500 ml of water samples of which the turbidity is predetermined are placed in
several beakers. Different concentrations of coagulant solution (1 ml of coagulant = 10
mg) are then added to the turbid solution. Contents of the beakers are then mixed
rapidly at a speed of 100 rpm (flash mixing) for a period of 5 seconds to achieve an
intimate contact between the coagulant and the turbid waters. After the flash mixing,
contents are flocculated at a very low speed of 20-30 rpm (conditioning) for ½ an hour
and afterwards allowed to stand for one hour. The clarified supernatant is then decanted
and analyzed for residual turbidity. Plots the graph of applied dose of coagulant against
residual turbidity and form it an optimum dose of coagulant giving a residual turbidity
of 20 units is found out.
Reactions: - i) Al2 (SO4)3 H2O Æ 2Al3+ + 3SO4+
4.5 pH 7.5 pH
3+ -
ii) Al + 3OH Å------------ Al (OH)2 Å------------- H+ + AlO2- + H2 O
---------Æ ---------Æ + H2O
4.5pH 7.5pH
iii) Al3+ + Colloid Æ Al –colloid. De stabilization
iv ) Al2 (SO4)2 + 6H2O Æ 2Al (OH)3 + 3H2SO4+ 3Ca (HCO3)2 + 3H2SO4
Æ 3CaSO4 + 6CO2 + 6H2O
= Al2 (SO4)3 + 6H2O + 3Ca (HCO2) + 3HSO Æ 2Al (OH)3 + 3H2SO4
+ 3CaSO4 + 6CO2 + 6H2
Result : The optimum coagulant dose for removal of maximum turbidity was found out to be ---
Conclusion : It was found that the dose of -- mg/l was optimum, for removal of turbidity in a given
sample.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment No
Reagents
i) Distilled water of highest purity and thoroughly aerated so as to saturate
with DO at a lowered temp. of 200C.
ii) Phosphate buffer solution – 8.5 gm KH2PO4 , 21.75 gm
K2 HPO4, 33.4 gm Na2 HPO4.
iii) Magnesium sulphate solution–22.5gm MgSO4H2O dissolved in 1-1 of
distilled water.
iv) Calcium chloride solution – 27.5 gm anhydrous CaCl2 dissolved in 1-1
distilled water.
Preparation of dilution water: Place required amount of aerated distilled water at 200C. Add 1 ml each of
phosphate buffer, magnesium sulphate, calcium chloride and ferric chloride
per liter of water, Seed the dilution water, if necessary by adding 1 to 10 ml
of settled sewage (24 to 36 hours old) per liter (seed should not exert more
then 0.5 mg/l of depletion of DO in the blank). Seeded dilution water
should be used the same day it is prepared..
Dilution of sample : When the BOD value is expected to be more than 5.0 mg/l, dilution of the
sample is necessarily neutralized at pH 7.0. Sample should be free from
residual chlorine. If it contains chlorine then sodium sulphide should be
added . Make several dilutions of the prepared solution for DO. Depletion in
DO should not be less than than 2 mg/ L and dissolved oxygen should not be
less than 1 mg/L after 5 days. Generally following dilutions suggested
0.1 to 1 % for strong trade waste
1 to 5 % for raw and settle waste / sewage
5 to 25 % for oxidized effluent
25 to 100 % for polluted river water
Procedure for BOD set up : Select a definite volume of sample (less than 300 ml), add to BOD bottle and
fill completely with dilution water. All concentrations should be in duplicate.
Keep one bottle of each concentrate in the BOD incubator for 5 Days at 200C
and subject the duplicate of that concentration to do determination of D.O. on
the same day. That will be zero Day D.O. Similarly put one or two bottles for
finding out the depletion of DO in blank (Seeded dilution water only) in
incubator and find out D.O. of these samples after 5 days. Find out the
difference between O day Do and 5 day DO values.
Result : The BOD5 of the given sample was found to be ------- mg/l
Conclusion : The BOD5 value of the sample is high / well within permissible limit of disposal.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment No
Theory : The COD is used to measure oxygen equivalent of organic matter content in a sample i.e.
susceptible to oxidation by a strong chemical oxidant. This is determined by refluxing the
sample with an excess of potassium dichromate in a highly acidic conditions and
estimating by titration the amount of dichromate used. A reducing agent like ferrous
ammonium sulphate is used. COD can be related empirically to BOD, organic carbon or
organic matter. The test is useful for monitoring and controlled after correlation has been
established. The dichromate reflux method is preferred to other oxidizing agents because
of superior oxidizing ability.
Principle : Most types of organic matters are oxidized by the boiling mixtures and chromic &
sulphuric acid . A sample is refluxed in strong acid solution with the known excess
amount of potassium dichromate. After digestion the reamaining unreduced K2Cr2O7 is
treated with ferrous ammonium sulphate (FAS ) to determine the amount of K2Cr2O7
consumed and oxidisable organic matter is calculated in terms of oxygen equivalent .
Mercuric sulphate is added to remove inference of chlorides. Silver sulphate is added as
catalyst as it catalyses oxidation of long chain aliphatic compounds.
Interference: Chlorides – 1mg/l Cl- exerts 0.23 mg/l of COD. Therefore correction as mg/l Cl- x 0.23
should be applied the COD of Cl- from the total COD. Nitrite exert COD of 1.1 mg/mgN.
Limitations: Amino nitrogen gets converted to ammonia nitrogen. All organic compounds with few
exceptions (e.g. aromatic hydrocarbons, straight aliphatic compounds and pyridine) are
oxidized by this procedure.
Reagents:
i) Standard potassium dichromate 0.25 N
ii) Conc. H2SO4 (A.R. Grade)
iii) Ferroin Indicator – Dissolve 1.485gm 1-10 phenanthroline monohydrate together with0.695
gm ferrous sulphate (FeSO4, 7H2O) in distilled water and dilute to 100 ml.
Result : The COD of the given sample was found to be ------- mg/l
Conclusion : The COD value of the sample is high / well within permissible limit of disposal.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Method: The determination shall be carried out either by the electrometric method, using glass and
calomel electrodes or by the indicator method. In case of dispute the electrometric method shall
be considered as the accurate method.
Electrometric pH Measurement: The pH meter is the most widely used electrical method for finding out
the hydrogen ion concentration of a sample. pH is defined as the logarithm of hydrogen ion
concentration with negative sign. In this case a Glass Electrode and a Reference Electrode are
inserted in a solution and the electric potential or voltage across these electrodes is taken as a
measure of the hydrogen ions in the solution. Reference Electrode is generally the Calomel
Electrode.
With ordinary glass electrode pH can be measured in a range of 2 to 10 pH only as the glass is
made up of sodium silicate which gets affected by pH beyond this range. Special glass
electrode called the Universal Glass Electrode can be used to detect pH in the full range of 0 to
14.
Indicator Method:
Reagents – Series of indicators and buffer solutions are required for this method or an universal indicator
(0.05 g methyl orange, 0.15 g methyl red 0.3 g bromothymol blue 0.35 of phenolphthalein in
one liter of 66% alcohol). Colour changes shown by universal indicator are as follows-
pH Up to 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
3
Colour Red Orange orange yellow yellowish greenish blue violet reddish
- red green blue violet
Indicators
(Individual indicators for different pH ranges)
Conclusion : The pH was found out to be alkaline / acidic / in the neutral range. The pH is in / not in the limit
of acceptable standards.
______________________________________________________________________
Procedure : Place standard turbidity solution tubes of 10 NTU, 100 NTU, 1000 NTU turbidity. Put
the tubes in nephelometer and calibrate it at these ranges. Remove the tube of standard
calibration and now put the tube containing sample for which the turbidity has to be
measured. The turbidity value will be displayed at the screen of the nephelometer. Note the
value, replace the tube with another one containing the sample.
Observation Table :
Result : The turbidity of given water sample was found out to be ---- NTU.
Conclusion : The turbidity of the sample is in / not in acceptable limit. It need / does not need chemical
treatment.
Aim : To determine sludge volume index of the given waste water sample
Calculation:-
% setting by volume
SVI = ------------------------------------
% suspended matter
ml. settled sludge x 1000
or SVI = --------------------------------------
mg/l. suspended matter
Result : The sludge volume Index of the given sample was found to be -----
Conclusion : The sample contain -------- % settleable solids.
____________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment No
Principle : Sulphate ions ( SO4-2 ) is precipitate in an acetic acid medium with barium chloride ( BaCl2) so
as to form barium sulphate (BaSO4) crystals of uniform size. Light absorption of the BaSO4
suspension is measured by photometer and the sulphate concentration is determined by
comparison of reading with standard curve.
Apparatus: 1) Magnetic stirrer
2) Klett summerson colorimeter or spectro photometer
3) Measuring spoon
Reagent:
a) Conditioning reagent – Mix 50 ml glycerol with a solution containing 30 ml
conc. HCL, 300 ml distilled water, 100 ml 95% ethyl alcohol and 75 gm
sodium chloride.
b) Barium chloride crystals ‘AR grade’.
c) Standard Sulphate solution – Prepare by diluting 10.41 ml of the standard 0.02
NH2SO4 to 100 ml with distilled water.
Procedure:
a) Formation of barium sulphate turbidity – Measure 100ml sample or a suitable
aliquot made up to 100 ml into a 250ml Erlenmeyer flask. Add exactly 5 ml
conditioning reagent and mix in the stirring apparatus. While the solution is
being stirred add a spoon full of barium chloride crystals stir
b) Measurements of barium sulphate turbidity – Immediately after the stirring period
is over, pour some of the solution into the absorption cell of the photometer and
measure the absorption at fifth minute. Maximum turbidity is usually achieved
within 2 min. and the reading remains constant there after for 3-10 min.
c) Read mg SO4 present in the sample on the calibration curve prepared by standard
solutions,
Result : The sulphate content of the given sample was found out to be -------- mg/l
Conclusion : The sulphate content is within / not in the prescribed limit as per specifications of WHO / CPCB
standards.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Reactions: NaOH
CaH: Murexide indicator (Purple) + Ca2 (part) -----------Æ Indicator Cachelate.
PH > 10
Excess Ca2+ + EDTA Æ EDTA – Ca chelate.
EDTA + Indicator – Cachelate Æ EDTA – Ca chelate + Indicator (purple)
Result : The Hardness of the given water sample was found to be ----------- mg /l
Conclusion : The given water is Hard / Soft . The hardness is within / above the acceptable limit of drinking
water.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Experiment No
Aim To prepare filter sand from the stock sand and determine effective size and
uniformity coefficient
Theory Natural run –of – bank sand may be too coarse or too fine for a projected filter.
Within economical limits, specified sizing and uniformity can be obtained by
screening out coarse grains and washing out fines. To get the purified water , the
sand should have specific properties i.e. D10 , D60.
Formula :
Pusable = 2 ( P60.- P10 )
Ptoo fine = {P10 – 0.2 (P60.- P10 ) }
Ptoo coarse = {P10 + 1.8 (P60.- P10 )}
Procedure Wash the sand and then filter the stock sand by arranging the various seives. Shake
the seives for the 20-30 minutes and the measure the wt of sand retained on each
sieve. From the data calculate the % retained on each sieve . Plot the graph by taking
% finer on ‘Y’ axis and diameter of grain size on ‘ X’ axis. From the graph find out
the value of D60 and D10. Assume the value of coefficient of sand ( CU) in the range
of 1.3-1.8. Calculate the Pusable, Ptoo fine , Ptoo coarse ..
Result : Pusable =
Ptoo fine =
Ptoo coarse =
From the plotted graph, the D10 and D60 for the sand are ---------------------------
Conclusion : Thus the D60 and D10 parameters for the sand are obtained from the given sample.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Aim : To determine the Available Chlorine and Residual Chlorine in a Given Water
Sample
Theory :
Chlorine determination includes:
a) Available chlorine in case of chlorine solution, bleaching powder or chlorine tablets.
b) Chlorine demand (assessment of the requirement of the quantity of chlorine to be added).
c) Residual Chlorine- i) Free residual during Break Point chlorination, ii) Total combined during Break
point Chlorination.
Apparatus: Chlorine Determination Kit (Colour Comapatometer)
a) Available Chlorine (Bleaching Powder):
Reagents:
ii) Bleaching powder solution: Make a paste of 1 g. bleaching powder (CaCl, OCL, H2O) in minimum
water and dilute the paste with distilled water to a volume of 100 ml. Take care to see that the
paste is transferred tot eh volumetric flask quantitatively.
iii) 0.025N sodium Thisulphate: 6.25 g. Na2S2O3, 5H2O is dissolved in 1 liter of distilled water.
iv) Glacial acetic acid.
v) Potassium iodide crystals.
vi) 0.1 N potassium iodate solution: 812 mg dissolved in 250 ml. distilled water.
vii) Starch indicator: 5 g soluble starch mixed with little water and ground in a pestle and mortar so as
to prepare a paste. Paste is than transferred quantitatively to 1 liter of boiling water. Mixture is then
allowed to settle overnight and the supernatant is used.
Procedure:
i) Take 10 ml of bleaching powder solution in a conical flask and add to it KI crystals. Sufficient
distilled water and approximately 2 ml of glacial acetic acid mix.
ii) Titrate the sample till dark amber colored solution turns to pale straw color.
iii) Add starch indicator and Mix.
iv) Titrate till the blue colored starch iodide complex becomes colorless.
Interference:
Mn, Fe, and NO2 interfere in Iodometric titration. To overcome this interference acetic acid is used in
place of H2SO4 for acidification of the sample.
Reactions:
Ca.OCl.Cl. H2O + 2CH5 COOH Æ (CH3 COO) 2 Ca + 2H2O+ Cl2
Cl2 + 2 KI Æ2 KCI + I2
I2 + StarchÆBlue colored Starch-iodide complex (Qualitative Test)
I2 + 2Na2 S2 O2Æ 2Nal + Na2 S4 O6 colorless (Qualitative Test)
Chlorine Demand:
General:
Disinfection is the unit operation which cannot be missed in the treatment plants from the point of
view of supply of safe water. Chlorine either in the form of gas or bleaching powder, is a universally accepted
disinfectant. In addition to destruction of pathogons, chlorination is also used to achieve oxidation of Fe2+,
NH3 Mn +, H2S removal of taste and odour problems and oxidation of organic compounds in water or waste
waters by forming their chloro-derivatives.
In order to have an effective disinfection by chlorine in water treatment, following points need
scientific thinking viz., determination of chlorine dose so as the have residual chlorine of 0.2 mg/l after a
contact time of 30 min. These points are very well considered in this concept of breakpoint chlorination.
Interference:
Unsaturated organic compounds, Fe2+ Mn2+, NO2, organic nitrogen and NH3 are the main interfering
substances.These can be eliminated by changing the sequence of regent additions using break point
chlorination.
Apparatus:
Chlorine determination kit (color comparator) to measure residual chlorine.
Reagents:
1. Orthotolidine: Dissolve 1.35 g orthotolidine dihydrochloride in 500 ml distilled water. Add it
to a mixture of 350 ml distilled water + 150 ml Conc. HCl. Store in a colored bottle.
2. Sod. Arsenite: Dissolve 5 g NaAsO2 and dilute to 1000 ml.
3. Standard chlorine solution: Prepare chlorine solution from bleaching powder and determine its
strength as described in the test for available chlorine. This solution has to be prepared freshly.
Procedure:
1. Take identical aliquots of 100ml well water in 12 conical flasks or bottles (stoppered).
2. Add chlorine solution in increasing quantity to the bottles or flasks to result in a concentration in the
range of 0.1 to 3.00 gm/l. Mix well.
3. Allow to stand for predetermined contact period usually 30 to 60 min.
4. Determine the residual chlorine present in each bottle by OT test as described.
5. Plot chlorine residual Vs chlorine added and determines chlorine required at breakpoint. This will give
the chlorine demand of that specific water.
6. This can also be determined by measuring free residual chlorine left after contact period. The dose
where 0.2 mg/l free residual chlorine is left out will give the amount of chlorine required to disinfect
the water.
Reaction : Cl OH
| |
i) –C = C – + HOCL Æ - C – C – (unsaturated organic compounds)
| | | |
H H H H
Procedure:
Use three Nessler cylinders and designate then as cylinders A, B and C. In cylinder a add 1 ml of O-tolidine
regent, 100 ml of the sample, mix and add immediately 2 ml of sod. Arsenite solution, mix
and after 5 seconds, compare the color with standard color solution.
This reaction (FR) represents the total of free residual chlorine and of interfering substances.
In cylinder B, add 2 ml of sodium arsenite solution and 100 ml of the sample mix and add immediately
1 ml of orihotolidine reagent. Mix and match the color with standard solutions. This reading (B1) is the blank
for interfering substances after 2 min standing. Also allow it to stand for 5 minutes and record the result. This
reading (B2) is the blank for interfering substance after 5 minutes standing.
In cylinder ‘C’ add 1 ml of O-tolidine reagent and 100 ml of the sample, mix and after 5 minutes
match the color. This reading (TR) gives the total residual chlorine plus interfering substances.
Mg/l ml Ml
I 0.01 0 0.8
II 0.02 0 2.1
IV 0.04 0 4.3
Calculation:
a) Free residual chlorine (as Cl) mg/l = FR-B1
b) Total residual chlorine (as Cl) mg/l = TR-B2
c) Combined residual chlorine (as Cl) mg/l = (TR-B2) - (FR-B1)
Range:
The method is applicable up to 5 mg/l of chlorine.
Result : The free, Total and combined residual chlorine values found out were ------
Experiment No.
Theory :
Conclusion : The sample contain the solids various percentage ------as which are within /beyond the
permissible limits.
__________________________________________________________________________________