Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION TO THE
PROJECT
Page61
1.1 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES:
1. To understand the concept of venture capital
5. To find out opportunities & threats those hinder and encourage Venture Capital
Industry in India
The research is based on secondary data collected from published material. The data was
also collected from the publications and press releases of venture capital associations in
India.
Scanning the business papers filled the gap in information. The Economic Times,
Financial Express and Business Standards were scanned for any article of news item
related to venture capital. Sufficient amount of data about the venture capital has been
derived from these reports.
Page61
1.4 Scope:
The scope of the research includes all type of Venture capital firms whether set up as
company or a trust fund. Venture Capital companies & funds irrespective of the fact that
they are registered with SEBI of India or not the part of this study. Angel investors have
been kept out of the study as it was not feasible to collect authenticated information about
them.
Page61
Chapter – 2
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Page61
2.1 Concept of Venture Capital
Venture Capital plays an important role in financing small scale enterprise and high
technology and risky ventures. The Venture Capital activity is quite advanced in
developed countries. It has also taken root in a number of developing countries. Venture
Capital has potential to become an important source of financing small scale enterprises.
The term Venture Capital comprises of two words that is, “Venture” and “Capital”.
Venture is a course of processing, the outcome of which is uncertain but to which is
attended the risk or danger of “loss”. “Capital” means recourses to start an enterprise. To
connote the risk and adventure of such a fund, the generic name Venture Capital was
coined.
Venture capital is considered as financing of high and new technology based enterprises.
It is said that Venture Capital involves investment in new or relatively untried
technology, initiated by relatively new and professionally or technically qualified
entrepreneurs with inadequate funds. The conventional financiers, unlike Venture
capitals, mainly finance proven technologies and established markets. However, high
technology need not be pre-requisite for venture capital.
Venture Capital has also been described as ‘unsecured risk financing’. The relatively high
risk of venture capital is compensated by the possibility of high returns usually through
substantial capital gains in the medium term. Venture capital in broader sense is not
solely an injection of funds into a new firm, it is also an input of skills needed to set up
the firm, design its marketing strategy, organize and manage it. Thus it is a long term
association with successive stages of company’s development under highly risk
investment conditions, with distinctive type of financing appropriate to each stage of
development. Investors join the entrepreneurs as co-partners and support the project with
finance and business skills to exploit the market opportunities.
“The support by investors of entrepreneurial talent with finance and business skills to
exploit market opportunities and thus obtain capital gains.”
Venture capital commonly describes not only the provision of start up finance or ‘seed
Page61
corn’ capital but also development capital for later stages of business. A long term
commitment of funds is involved in the form of equity investments, with the aim of
eventual capital gains rather than income and active involvement in the management of
customer’s business.
Operations risk: Operation may not be cost effective resulting in increased cost
and decreased gross margins.
iii. Long Term Investment: Venture capital financing is a long term investment. It
generally takes a long period to en-cash the investment in securities made by
the venture capitalists.
Venture Capital differs from Development Funds as latter means putting up of industries
without much consideration of use of new technology or new entrepreneurial venture but
having a focus on undeveloped areas (locations). In majority of cases it is in the form of
loan capital and proportion of equity is very thin. Development finance is security
oriented and liquidity prone. The criteria for investment are proven track record of
company and its promoters, and sufficient cash generation to provide for returns
(principal & interest). The development bank safeguards its interest through collateral.
They have no say in working of the enterprise except safeguarding their interest by
having a nominee director. They do not play any active role in the enterprise except
ensuring flow of information and proper management information system, regular board
meetings, adherence to statutory requirements for effective management control where as
Venture capitalist remain interested if the overall management of the project o account of
high risk involved I the project till its completion, entering into production and making
available proper exit route for liquidation of the investment. As against this fixed
payments in the form of installment of principal and interest are to be made to
development banks.
It is difficult to make a distinction between venture capital and seed capital and Risk
capital as the latter two forms part of broader meaning of venture capital. Difference
between them arises on account of application of funds and terms and conditions
applicable. The seed capital and risk funds in India are being provided basically to
arrange promoters contribution to the project. The objective is to provide finance and
encourage professionals to become promoters of industrial projects. The seed capital is
provided to conventional project on the consideration of low risk and security and use
conventional techniques for appraisal. Unlike Venture Capital, Seed capital providers
neither provide any value addition nor participation in the management of the project.
Unlike Venture capital Seed capital provider is satisfied with low risk-normal returns and
lacks any flexibility in its approach.
Page61
Risk capital is also provided to established companies for adapting new technologies.
Herein the approach is not business oriented but developmental. As a result on the one
hand the success rates of units assisted by Seed Capital\Risk
Finance has been lower than those provided with venture capital. On the other hand the
return to the seed\risk capital financier has been very low as compare to venture
capitalist.
venture with his own funds. At this stage, the funds are needed to solicit the consultants’
service in formulation of business plan, meeting potential customers and technology
partners. Next the fund would be required for the development of the product\process,
hiring key people and building up the management team. This is followed by funds for
assembling the manufacturing and marketing facilities in that order. Finally the funds are
needed to expand the business for more profits. Venture Capitalist cater to the need of the
entrepreneurs at the different stages of their enterprise. Depending upon the stage they
finance, venture capitalist are called angel investors, venture capitalist or private equity
supplier/investor.
Venture capital was started as early stage financing of relatively small but growing
companies. However various reasons forced venture capitalist to be more and more
involved in expansion financing to support the development of existing portfolio
companies. With increasing demand of capital for newer business, Venture capitalist
began to operate across a broader spectrum of investment interest. This diversity of
opportunities enabled Venture capitalists to balance their activities in term of time
involvement, risk acceptance and reward potential, while providing on going assistance
to developing business.
Different venture capital firms have different attributes and aptitudes for different types
of Venture capital investments. Hence there are different stages of entry for different
venture capitalist and they can identify and differentiate between types of venture capital
investments, each appropriate for the given stage of the investee company. These are:
Seed capital
Start up capital
Early\First stage capital
Later\Third Stage Capital
Not all business firms pass all of these stages in a sequential manner. For instance seed
capital is not required by service based ventures. It implies largely to manufacturing or
research based activities. Similarly second round finance does not always follow early
Page61
stage finance. If the business grows successfully, it is likely to develop sufficient cash to
fund its own growth, so does not require venture capital for growth.
The table below shows risk perception and time orientation for different stages of venture
capital financing.
provided to an entrepreneur to prove the feasibility of a project and to qualify for start up
capital”.
The characteristics of the seed capital may be enumerated as follows:
Broadly speaking seed capital investment may take 7 to 10 years to achieve realization. It
is the earliest and therefore riskiest stage of Venture capital investment. The new
technology and innovations being attempted have equal chance of success and failure.
Such projects, particularly hi-tech, projects sink a lot of cash and need a strong financial
support for their adaptation, commencement and eventual success.
However, while the earliest stage of financing is fraught with risk, it also provides greater
potential for realizing significant gains in long term. Typically seed enterprises lack asset
base or track record to obtain finance from conventional sources and are largely
dependent upon entrepreneur’s personal resources. Seed capital is provided after being
satisfied that the entrepreneur has used up his own resources and carried out his idea to a
stage of acceptance and has initiated research. The asset underlying the seed capital is
often technology or an idea as opposed to human assets (a good management team) so
often sought by venture capitalists.
It has been observed that Venture capitalist seldom make seed capital investment and
these are relatively small by comparison to other forms of venture finance. The absence
of interest in providing a significant amount of seed capital can be attributed to the
following three factors: -
a) Seed capital projects by their very nature require a relatively small amount of capital.
The success or failure of an individual seed capital investment will have little impact on
the performance of all but the smallest venture capitalist’s portfolio. Larger venture
capitalists avoid seed capital investments. This is because the small investments are seen
to be cost inefficient in terms of time required to analyze, structure and manage them.
b) The time horizon to realization for most seed capital investments is typically 7-10
years which is longer than all but most long-term oriented investors will desire.
c) The risk of product and technology obsolescence increases as the time to realization is
extended. These types of obsolescence are particularly likely to occur with high
technology investments particularly in the fields related to Information Technology.
Page61
2.4.2 Start up Capital
It is stage 2 in the venture capital cycle and is distinguishable from seed capital
investments. An entrepreneur often needs finance when the business is just starting. The
start up stage involves starting a new business. Here in the entrepreneur has moved closer
towards establishment of a going concern. Here in the business concept has been fully
investigated and the business risk now becomes that of turning the concept into product.
Start up capital is defined as: “Capital needed to finance the product development, initial
marketing and establishment of product facility. “
ii. Establishment of most but not all the members of the team: The skills and
fitness to the job and situation of the entrepreneur’s team is an important
factor for start up finance.
iii. Development of business plan or idea: The business plan should be fully
developed yet the acceptability of the product by the market is uncertain. The
company has not yet started trading.
In the start up preposition venture capitalists’ investment criteria shifts from idea to
people involved in the venture and the market opportunity. Before committing any
finance at this stage, Venture capitalist however, assesses the managerial ability and the
capacity of the entrepreneur, besides the skills, suitability and competence of the
managerial team are also evaluated. If required they supply managerial skills and
supervision for implementation. The time horizon for start up capital will be typically 6
or 8 years. Failure rate for start up is 2 out of 3. Start up needs funds by way of both first
round investment and subsequent follow-up investments. The risk tends t be lower
relative to seed capital situation. The risk is controlled by initially investing a smaller
amount of capital in start-ups. The decision on additional financing is based upon the
successful performance of the company. However, the term to realization of a start up
investment remains longer than the term of finance normally provided by the majority of
financial institutions. Longer time scale for using exit route demands continued watch on
start up projects.
Despite potential for spectacular returns most venture firms avoid investing in start-ups.
One reason for the paucity of start up financing may be high discount rate that venture
Page61
capitalist applies to venture proposals at this level of risk and maturity. They often prefer
to spread their risk by sharing the financing. Thus syndicates of investor’s often
participate in start up finance.
It is also called first stage capital is provided to entrepreneur who has a proven product,
to start commercial production and marketing, not covering market expansion, de-risking
and acquisition costs.
At this stage the company passed into early success stage of its life cycle. A proven
management team is put into this stage, a product is established and an identifiable
market is being targeted.
British Venture Capital Association has vividly defined early stage finance as: “Finance
provided to companies that have completed the product development stage and require
further funds to initiate commercial manufacturing and sales but may not be generating
profits.”
The early stage finance usually takes 4 to 6 years time horizon to realization. Early stage
finance is the earliest in which two of the fundamentals of business are in place i.e. fully
assembled management team and a marketable product. A company needs this round of
finance because of any of the following reasons: -
The firm needs additional equity funds, which are not available from other sources thus
prompting venture capitalist that, have financed the start up stage to provide further
financing. The management risk is shifted from factors internal to the firm (lack of
management, lack of product etc.) to factors external to the firm (competitive pressures,
in sufficient will of financial institutions to provide adequate capital, risk of product
Page61
obsolescence etc.)
At this stage, capital needs, both fixed and working capital needs are greatest. Further,
since firms do not have foundation of a trading record, finance will be difficult to obtain
and so Venture capital particularly equity investment without associated debt burden is
key to survival of the business.
a) The early stage firms may have drawn the attention of and incurred the challenge of a
larger competition.
b) There is a risk of product obsolescence. This is more so when the firm is involved in
high-tech business like computer, information technology etc.
It is the capital provided for marketing and meeting the growing working capital needs of
an enterprise that has commenced the production but does not have positive cash flows
sufficient to take care of its growing needs. Second stage finance, the second trench of
Early State Finance is also referred to as follow on finance and can be defined as the
provision of capital to the firm which has previously been in receipt of external capital
but whose financial needs have subsequently exploded. This may be second or even third
injection of capital.
Second round financing typically comes in after start up and early stage funding and so
have shorter time to maturity, generally ranging from 3 to 7 years. This stage of financing
has both positive and negative reasons.
It is called third stage capital is provided to an enterprise that has established commercial
production and basic marketing set-up, typically for market expansion, acquisition,
product development etc. It is provided for market expansion of the enterprise. The
enterprises eligible for this round of finance have following characteristics:
“Funds are utilized for further plant expansion, marketing, working capital or
development of improved products.” Third stage financing is a mix of equity with debt or
subordinate debt. As it is half way between equity and debt in US it is called
“mezzanine” finance. It is also called last round of finance in run up to the trade sale or
public offer.
Venture capitalist s prefer later stage investment vis a vis early stage investments, as the
rate of failure in later stage financing is low. It is because firms at this stage have a past
performance data, track record of management, established procedures of financial
control. The time horizon for realization is shorter, ranging from 3 to 5 years. This helps
the venture capitalists to balance their own portfolio of investment as it provides a
running yield to venture capitalists. Further the loan component in third stage finance
provides tax advantage and superior return to the investors.
At this stage the real market feedback is used to analyze competition. It may be found
that the entrepreneur needs to develop his managerial team for handling growth and
managing a larger business.
Replacement Finance:
It means substituting one shareholder for another, rather than raising new capital resulting
in the change of ownership pattern. Venture capitalist purchase shares from the
entrepreneurs and their associates enabling them to reduce their shareholding in unlisted
companies. They also buy ordinary shares from non-promoters and convert them to
preference shares with fixed dividend coupon. Later, on sale of the company or its listing
on stock exchange, these are re-converted to ordinary shares. Thus Venture capitalist
makes a capital gain in a period of 1 to 5 years.
It is a recent development and a new form of investment by venture capitalist. The funds
provided to the current operating management to acquire or purchase a significant share
holding in the business they manage are called management buyout.
It is the most popular form of venture capital amongst later stage financing. It is less risky
as venture capitalist in invests in solid, ongoing and more mature business. The funds are
provided for acquiring and revitalizing an existing product line or division of a major
business. MBO (Management buyout) has low risk as enterprise to be bought have
existed for some time besides having positive cash flow to provide regular returns to the
venture capitalist, who structure their investment by judicious combination of debt and
equity. Of late there has been a gradual shift away from start up and early finance to
wards MBO opportunities. This shift is because of lower risk than start up investments.
Turnaround Finance :
Page61
It is rare form later stage finance which most of the venture capitalist avoid because of
higher degree of risk. When an established enterprise becomes sick, it needs finance as
well as management assistance foe a major restructuring to revitalize growth of profits.
Unquoted company at an early stage of development often has higher debt than equity; its
cash flows are slowing down due to lack of managerial skill and inability to exploit the
market potential. The sick companies at the later stages of development do not normally
have high debt burden but lack competent staff at various levels. Such enterprises are
compelled to relinquish control to new management. The venture capitalist has to carry
out the recovery process using hands on management in 2 to 5 years. The risk profile and
anticipated rewards are akin to early stage investment.
Bridge Finance:
Venture Capitalists are high risk investors and, in accepting these risks, they desire a
higher risks, they desire a higher return on their investment. The Venture Capitalist
manages the risk-return ratio by only investing in businesses that fit their investment
criteria and after having completed extensive due diligence.
Venture capitalists have differing operating approaches. These differences may relate to
the location of the business, the size of the investment, the stage of the company, industry
specialization, structure to the investment and involvement of the venture capitalists in
the company’s activities. The entrepreneur should not be discouraged if one venture
capitalist does not wish to proceed with an investment in the company. The rejection may
not be a reflection of the quality of the business, but rather a matter of the business not
fitting with the venture capitalist’s particular investment criteria.
Venture capital is not suitable for all businesses, as a venture capitalist typically seeks:
Superior businesses: Venture capitalists look for companies with superior products or
services targeted at fast-growing or untapped markets with a defensible strategic position.
Alternatively, for leveraged management buyouts, they are seeking companies with high
borrowing capacity, stability of earnings and an ability to generate surplus cash to quickly
repay debt.
Page61
Quality and depth of management: Venture capitalists must be confident that the firm
has the quality and depth in the management team to achieve its aspirations. Venture
capitalists seldom seek managerial control; rather, they want to add value to the
investment where they have particular skills including fundraising, mergers and
acquisitions, international marketing and networks.
Exit plan: Lastly, venture capitalists look for clear exit routes for their investments such
as public listing or a third-party acquisition of the investee company.
1. Deal Origination
2. Screening
3. Evaluation or due diligence
4. Deal structuring
5. Post-investment activities and exit
Page61
The Venture Capital Investment Process
2. Screening: VCFs carry out initial screening of all projects on the basis of some broad
criteria. For example the screening process may limit projects to areas in which the
venture capitalist is familiar in terms of technology, or product, or market scope. The size
of investment, geographical location and stage of financing could also be used as the
broad screening criteria.
3. Evaluation or due diligence: Once a proposal has passed through initial screening, it
is subjected to a detailed evaluation or due diligence process. Most ventures are new and
the entrepreneurs may lack operating experience. Hence a sophisticated, formal
evaluation is neither possible nor desirable. The VCs thus rely on a subjective but
comprehensive, evaluation. VCFs evaluate the quality of the entrepreneur before
appraising the characteristics of the product, market or technology. Most venture
capitalists ask for a business plan to make an assessment of the possible risk and expected
return on the venture.
4. Deal Structuring: Once the venture has been evaluated as viable, the venture capitalist
and the investment company negotiate the terms of the deal, i.e. the amount, form and
price of the investment. This process is termed as deal structuring. The agreement also
includes the protective covenants and earn-out arrangements. Covenants include the
venture capitalists right to control the investee company and to change its management if
needed, buy back arrangements, acquisition, making initial public offerings (IPOs) etc,
Earn-out arrangements specify the entrepreneur's equity share and the objectives to be
achieved.
Page61
Venture capitalists generally negotiate deals to ensure protection of their interests. They
would like a deal to provide for:
The investee companies would like the deal to be structured in such a way that their
interests are protected. They would like to earn reasonable return, minimize taxes, have
enough liquidity to operate their business and remain in commanding position of their
business.
There are a number of common concerns shared by both the venture capitalists and the
investee companies. They should be flexible, and have a structure, which protects their
mutual interests and provides enough incentives to both to cooperate with each other.
The instruments to be used in structuring deals are many and varied. The objective in
selecting the instrument would be to maximize (or optimize) venture capital's
returns/protection and yet satisfy the entrepreneur's requirements. The different
instruments through which a Venture Capitalist could invest a company include: Equity
shares, preference shares, loans, warrants and options.
5. Post-investment Activities and Exit: Once the deal has been structured and
agreement finalized, the venture capitalist generally assumes the role of a partner and
collaborator. He also gets involved in shaping of the direction of the venture. This may be
done via a formal representation of the board of directors, or informal influence in
improving the quality of marketing, finance and other managerial functions. The degree
of the venture capitalists involvement depends on his policy. It may not, however, be
desirable for a venture capitalist to get involved in the day-to-day operation of the
venture. If a financial or managerial crisis occurs, the venture capitalist may intervene,
and even install a new management team.
Venture capitalists typically aim at making medium-to long-term capital gains. They
generally want to cash-out their gains in five to ten years after the initial investment.
They play a positive role in directing the company towards particular exit routes. A
venture capitalist can exit in four ways:
Equity: All VCFs in India provide equity but generally their contribution does
not exceed 49 percent of the total equity capital. Thus, the effective control and
majority ownership of the firm remains with the entrepreneur. They buy shares of
an enterprise with an intention to ultimately sell them off to make capital gains.
In the start-up phase, before the venture attains operations to a minimum level, no interest
is charged. After this, a low rate of interest is charged up to a particular level of
operation. Once the venture starts operating on full commercial basis, a high rate of
interest is required to be paid. A variation could be in terms of paying a certain share of
the post-tax profits instead of royalty.
VCFs in India provide venture finance through partially of fully convertible debentures
and cumulative convertible preference shares (CPP). CPP could be particularly attractive
in the Indian context since CPP shareholders do not have the right to receive dividend
consecutively for two years
In the developed countries like USA and the UK, the venture capital firms are
accustomed to using a wide range of financial instruments. They include:
1. Deferred Shares: where ordinary share rights are deferred for a certain number
of years
2. Convertible Loan Stock: which is unsecured long term loan convertible into
ordinary shares and subordinated to all creditors
3. Special Ordinary Shares: with voting rights but without a commitment towards
Page61
dividend.
4. Preferred Ordinary Shares: With voting rights and a modest fixed dividend
right and a right to share in profits.
2.8 Disinvestment Mechanism:
The true objective of a true venture capitalist is to sell of his investment at substantial
capital gains. But most venture funds in India aim to operate on commercial lines along
with satisfying their developmental objectives. A venture capitalist is generally not in a
position to realize his investment before five to seven years.
1. Promoters Buyback:
The most important disinvestments route in India is the promoter’s buyback. This route is
suited to Indian condition because it keeps the ownership and control of the promoter
intact. The obvious limitation, however, is that in the majority of cases the market value
of the shares of the venture firm would have appreciated so much after some years that
the promoter would not be in a position to buy them back.
In India, promoters are invariably given the option to buyback the equity of their
enterprises. For example, RCTC participates in the assisted firm’s equity with suitable
agreement for the promoter to repurchase it. Similarly, Canfina-VCF offers an
opportunity to promoters to buyback the shares of the assisted firm within an agreed
period at a predetermined price. If the promoter fails to buyback the shares within the
stipulated time, Canfina-VCF would have the discretion to divest them in any manner it
deemed appropriate. SBI capital market ensures through examining the personal assets of
the promoters and their associates, which buyback, would be a feasible option.
The benefits of the disinvestments via the public issue route are improved marketability
and liquidity, better prospects for capital gains and widely known status of the venture as
well as market control through public share participation. The option has certain
limitations in Indian context. The promotion of the public issue would be difficult and
expensive since the first generation entrepreneurs are not known in the capital market.
Further, difficulties will be caused if the entrepreneur’s business is perceived to be an
unattractive investment proposition by investors. Also the emphasis of the Indian
investors on the short term profits and dividends may tend to make the market price
unattractive. Yet another difficulty in India until recently was the Controller of Capital
Issues (CCI) guidelines for determining the premium on shares took into account the
book value and the cumulative average EPS till the date of the new issue. This formula
failed to give due weight age to the expected stream of earning of the venture firm. Thus,
the formula would underestimate the premium. The Government has now abolished the
Capital Issues Control Act, 1947 and consequently, the office of the controller of Capital
Page61
Issues. The existing companies are now free to fix the premium on their shares. The
initial public issue for disinvestments of VCFs’ holding can involve high transaction
costs because of the inefficiency of the secondary market in a country like India. Also,
this option has become far less feasible for small ventures on account of the higher listing
requirement of the stock exchanges. In February 1989, the Government of India raised
the minimum capital for listing on the stock exchanges from Rs 10 million to Rs 30
million and the minimum public offer from Rs 6 million to Rs 18 million.
An active secondary capital market provides the necessary impetus to the success of the
venture capital. VCFs should be able to sell their holdings, and investors should be able
to trade shares conveniently and freely. In the USA, there exist well-developed OTC
markets where dealers trade in shares on telephone/terminal and not on an exchange
floor. This mechanism enables new, small companies which are not otherwise eligible to
be listed on the stock exchange, to enlist on the OTC markets and provides liquidity to
investors. The National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System
(NASDAQ) in the USA daily quotes over 8000 stock prices of companies backed by
venture capital.
The OTC Exchange in India was established in June 1992. The Government of India had
approved the creation for the Exchange under the Securities Contracts (Regulations) Act
in 1989. It has been promoted jointly by UTI, ICICI, SBI Capital Markets, Can bank
Financial Services, GIC, LIC and IDBI. Since this list of market-makers (who will decide
daily prices and appoint dealers for trading) includes most of the public sector venture
financiers, it should pick up fast, and it should be possible for investors to trade in the
securities of new small and medium size enterprises.
The other disinvestments mechanisms such as the management buyouts or sale to other
venture funds are not considered to be appropriate by VCFs in India.
Page61
2.9 The Players
The players:
Angels are wealthy individuals who invest directly into companies. They can form angel
clubs to coordinate and bundle their activities. Besides the money, angels often provide
their personal knowledge, experience and contacts to support their investees. With
average deals sizes from USD 100,000 to USD 500,000 they finance companies in their
early stages. Examples for angel clubs are Media Club, Dinner Club, Angel's Forum
These are smaller Venture Capital Companies that mostly provide seed and start-up
capital. The so called "Boutique firms" are often specialised in certain industries or
market segments. Their capitalisation is about USD 20 to USD 50 million (is this deals
size or total money under management or money under management per fund?).
Examples are:
Artemis Comaford
Abbell Venture Fund
Acacia Venture Partners
The medium venture funds finance all stages after seed stage and operate in all business
segments. They provide money for deals up to USD 250 million. Single funds have up to
USD 5 billion under management. An example is Accel Partners
These Venture Capital funds are set up and owned by technology companies. Their aim is
to widen the parent company's technology base in an win-win-situation for both, the
investor and the investee. In general, corporate funds invest in growing or maturing
companies, often when the investee wishes to make additional investments in technology
or product development. The average deals size is between USD 2 million and USD 5
Page61
Oracle
Adobe
Dell
Kyocera
Financial funds:
A solution for financial funds could be a shift to a higher security of Venture Capital
activities. That means that the parent companies shift the risk to their customers by
creating new products such as stakes in an Venture Capital fund. However, the success of
such products will depend on the overall climate and expectations in the economy. As
long as the sownturn continues without any sign of recovery customers might prefer less
risky alternatives.
Page61
CHAPTER – 3
VENTURE CAPITAL
IN INDIA
Page61
3.1 Evolution of VC Industry in India
The major analysis on risk capital on India was reported in 1983. It indicated that new
companies often confront serious barriers to entry into capital markets for raising equity
finance which undermines their future prospects of expansion & diversification. It also
indicated that on the whole there is the need to revive the equity cult among the masses
by ensuring competitive return on equity investment. This brought out the institutional
inadequacies with respect to evolution of the Venture Capital.
In India, Industrial Finance Corporation of India (IFCI) initiated the idea of VC when it
established the Risk Capital Foundation in 1975 to provide seed capital to small and risky
projects. However the concept of VC financing got statutory recognition for the first time
in the Fiscal Budget for the year 1986 – 87.
The Venture Capital companies operating at present can be divided into 4 groups:
Promoted by All India Development Financial Institutions
Promoted by State Level Financial Institutions
Promoted by Commercial Banks
Private Venture Capitalists
The IDBI started a VC fund in 1987 as per the long term fiscal policy of government of
India, with an initial capital of 10 crores which raised by imposing a cess of 5% on all
payment made for the import of Technology know-how projects requiring funds from Rs
5 Lacs to Rs 2.5 Crores were considered for financing. Promoters contribution ranged
from this fund was available at a concessional interest rate of 9% (during gestation
period) which could be increased at later stages.
The ICICI provides the required impetus to VC activities in India, 1986, it started
providing VC finance on 1998 it promoted, along with the Unit Trust of India (UTI)
Technology Development & Information Company of India (TDICI) as the first VC
company registered under companies act, 1956. The TDICI may provide financial
assistance to Venture Capital undertakings which are set up by technocrat entrepreneurs
or technology information & guidance services.
The Risk Capital Foundation established by the Industrial Finance Corporation of India
(IFCI) in 1975, was converted in 1988 into the Risk Capital & Technology Finance
Page61
In India, the State Level Financial Institutions in some states such as Madhya Pradesh,
Gujarat, Uttar Pradesh etc have done an excellent job and have provided VC to a small
scale enterprises. Several successful entrepreneurs have been the beneficiaries of the
liberal funding environment. In 1990, the Gujarat Industrial Investment Corporation,
promoted the Gujarat Venture Financial Ltd (GVFL) along with other promoters such as
IDBI, the World Bank etc. The GVFL provides assistance to businesses in the form of
equity , conditional loans or income notes for technological development and product
innovation. It also provides financial assistance to entrepreneurs.
The Government of Andhra Pradesh has also promoted the Andhra Pradesh Industrial
Development Corporation (APIDC) Venture Capital Ltd to provide VC financing in
Andhra Pradesh.
Canbank Venture Capital Fund, State bank Venture Capital Fund and Grindlays Bank
Venture Capital Funds have been set up by respective commercial banks to undertake VC
activities.
The State bank Venture Capital Fund provides financial assistance for bought-out deal as
well as new companies in the form of equity which it disinvests after the
commercialization of the project.
Canbank Venture Capital Fund provides financial assistance for proven but yet to be
commercially exploited technologies. It provides assistance both in the form of equity
and conditional loans.
Several private sector Venture Capital Funds have been established in India such as the
20th Centure Venture Capital Company, Indus venture Capital Fund, Infrastructure
Leasing and Financial services Ltd.
Some of the companies that have received funding through this route includes:
• Mastek, one of the oldest software house in India
• Ruskan Software, Pune based software consultancy
• SQL Star, Hyderabad based training and software development consultancy
Page61
3.2.1 Phase I - Formation of TDICI in the 80’s and regional funds as GVFL & APIDC in
the early 90s.
The first origins of modern venture capital in India can be traced to the setting up of a
Technology Development Fund in the year 1987-88, through the levy of access on all
technology import payments. Technology Development Fund was started to provide
financial support to innovative and high risk technological programs through the
Industrial Development Bank of India.
The first phase was the initial phase in which the concept of VC got wider acceptance.
The first period did not really experience any substantial growth of VCs’. The 1980’s
were marked by an increasing disillusionment with the trajectory of the economic system
and a belief that liberalization was needed. The liberalization process started in 1985 in a
limited way. The concept of venture capital received official recognition in 1988 with the
announcement of the venture capital guidelines.
During 1988 to 1992 about 9 venture capital institutions came up in India. Though the
venture capital funds should operate as open entities, Government of India controlled
them rigidly. One of the major forces that induced Government of India to start venture
funding was the World Bank. The initial funding has been provided by World Bank. The
most important feature of the 1988 rules was that venture capital funds received the
benefit of a relatively low capital gains tax rate which was lower than the corporate rate.
The 1988 guidelines stipulated that VC funding firms should meet the following criteria:
• Technology involved should be new, relatively untried, very closely held, in the
process of being taken from pilot to commercial stage or incorporate some
significant improvement over the existing ones in India
Between 1988 and 1994 about 11 VC funds became operational either through
reorganizing the businesses or through new entities.
All these followed the Government of India guidelines for venture capital activities and
have primarily supported technology oriented innovative businesses started by first
generation entrepreneurs. Most of these were operated more like a financing operation.
The main feature of this phase was that the concept got accepted. VCs became
operational in India before the liberalization process started. The context was not fully
ripe for the growth of VCs. Till 1995; the VCs operated like any bank but provided funds
without collateral. The first stage of the venture capital industry in India was plagued by
in experienced management, mandates to invest in certain states and sectors and general
regulatory problems. Many public issues by small and medium companies have shown
that the Indian investor is becoming increasingly wary of investing in the projects of new
and unknown promoters.
The liberation of the economy and toning up of the capital market changed the economic
landscape. The decisions relating to issue of stocks and shares was handled by an office
namely: Controller of Capital Issues (CCI). According to 1988 VC guideline, any
organization requiring to start venture funds have to forward an application to CCI.
Subsequent to the liberalization of the economy in 1991, the office of CCI was abolished
in May 1992 and the powers were vested in Securities and Exchange Board of India. The
Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 empowers SEBI under section 11(2)
thereof to register and regulate the working of venture capital funds. This was done in
1996, through a government notification. The power to control venture funds has been
given to SEBI only in 1995 and the notification came out in 1996. Till this time, venture
funds were dominated by Indian firms. The new regulations became the harbinger of the
second phase of the VC growth.
3.2.2Phase II - Entry of Foreign Venture Capital funds (VCF) between 1995 -1999
The second phase of VC growth attracted many foreign institutional investors. During
this period overseas and private domestic venture capitalists began investing in VCF. The
new regulations in 1996 helped in this. Though the changes proposed in 1996 had a
salutary effect, the development of venture capital continued to be inhibited because of
the regulatory regime and restricted the FDI environment. To facilitate the growth of
venture funds, SEBI appointed a committee to recommend the changes needed in the VC
funding context. This coincided with the IT boom as well as the success of Silicon Valley
start-ups. In other words, VC growth and IT growth co-evolved in India
3.2.3 Phase III - (2000 onwards) - VC becomes risk averse and activity declines:
Not surprisingly, the investing in India came “crashing down” when NASDAQ lost 60%
of its value during the second quarter of 2000 and other public markets (including those
in India) also declined substantially. Consequently, during 2001-2003, the VCs started
investing less money and in more mature companies in an effort to minimize the risks.
Page61
Since India’s economy has been growing at 7%-8% a year, and since some sectors,
including the services sector and the high-end manufacturing sector, have been growing
at 12%-14% a year, investors renewed their interest and started investing again in 2004.
The number of deals and the total dollars invested in India has been increasing
substantially.
There are 160 venture capital firms/funds in India. In 2006 it is only but in 2007 the
number of venture capital firms are 146. The reason is good position of capital market.
But in 2008 no. of venture capital firms increase by only 14. the reason is crash down of
capital market by 51% from January to November 2008. The No. of venture capital funds
are increasing year by year.
Venture capital growth and industrial clustering have a strong positive correlation.
Foreign direct investment, starting of R&D centers, availability of venture capital and
growth of entrepreneurial firms are getting concentrated into five clusters. The cost of
monitoring and the cost of skill acquisition are lower in clusters, especially for
innovation. Entry costs are also lower in clusters. Creating entrepreneurship and
stimulating innovation in clusters have to become a major concern of public policy
makers. This is essential because only when the cultural context is conducive for risk
management venture capital will take-of clusters support innovation and facilitates risk
bearing. VCs prefer clusters because the information costs are lower. Policies for
promoting dispersion of industries are becoming redundant after the economic
liberalization.
The venture capital firm invest their money in most developing sectors like health care,
Page61
The latest numbers take the total VC investments in the first nine months of 2008 to $661
million (across 108 deals) as against the $648 million (across 97 deals) during the
corresponding period in 2007.
Led by the $12 million investment by Bellwether and others into Chennai-based
microfinance firm Equitas, BFSI emerged as the second largest (in value terms) for VC
investments during the period. Other microfinance firms that attracted investments during
Q3 ’08 included Kolkata-based Arohan Financial Services (which raised funding from
Lok Capital and others) and Guwahati-based Asomi Finance (IFC and Aavishkaar
Goodwell).
Investment by Stage
Page61
3.5 Need for growth of venture capital in India
Few reasons for which active Venture Capital Industry is important for India include:
Job creation: large pool of skilled graduates in the first and second tier cities
Creating new industry clusters: Media, Retail, Call Centers and back office
processing, trickling down to organized effort of support services like office
services, catering, transportation
Investment Criteria: The earlier investment criteria has been substituted by a new
investment criteria which has the following requirements :
Not more than 25% of the investible funds may be invested by way of:
It has also been provided that Venture Capital Fund seeking to avail benefit under the
relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act will be required to divest from the investment
within a period of one year from the listing of the Venture Capital Undertaking.
Disclosure and Information to Investors: In order to simplify and expedite the process
of fund raising, the requirement of filing the Placement memorandum with SEBI is
dispensed with and instead the fund will be required to submit a copy of Placement
Memorandum/ copy of contribution agreement entered with the investors along with the
details of the fund raised for information to SEBI. Further, the contents of the Placement
Memorandum are strengthened to provide adequate disclosure and information to
investors. SEBI will also prescribe suitable reporting requirement from the fund on their
investment activity.
QIB status for Venture Capital Funds: The venture capital funds will be eligible to
participate in the IPO through book building route as Qualified Institutional Buyer
Page61
The following will be the salient features of SEBI (Foreign Venture Capital
Investors) Regulations, 2000 :
Eligibility Criteria : Entity incorporated and established outside India in the form of
investment company, trust, partnership, pension fund, mutual fund, university fund,
endowment fund, asset management company, investment manager, investment
management company or other investment vehicle incorporated outside India would be
eligible for seeking registration from SEBI. SEBI for the purpose of registration shall
consider whether the applicant is regulated by an appropriate foreign regulatory
authority; or is an income tax payer; or submits a certificate from its banker of its or its
promoters’ track record where the applicant is neither a regulated entity nor an income
tax payer.
Investment Criteria:
Disclosure of investment strategy;
Maximum investment in single venture capital undertaking not to exceed 25% of the
funds committed for investment to India however it can invest its total fund committed in
one venture capital fund;
Atleast 75% of the investible funds to be invested in unlisted equity shares or equity
linked instruments.
Not more than 25% of the investible funds may be invested by way of:
Trading in unlisted equity : The Board also approved the proposal to permit OTCEI to
develop a trading window for unlisted securities where Qualified Institutional Buyers
(QIB) would be permitted to participate.
Over the last few years Indian venture capital has evolved its own set of procedures and
practices. The foremost of these practices is the manner in which Indian venture firms
choose their investments. Like their counterparts in US and Europe venture capitalists
here look for investments with a characteristic of high risk and high return. The choice of
investment is the function of the venture capitalists policy with regards to the preferred
industries and the stage of the investee company, yet the exact choice of investment vary
from one venture capital fund to another.
A venture capital (VC) who is financing the firm would as the first necessity assess and
gauge the promoters. Because in the case of start-up where the product or the technology
is yet to be tested, the only thing they can trust and their investment on the people behind
it. While investing in a company what a VC is essentially looking for is a partnership and
therefore the first decision making criterion is the character and personality of the
promoters. However from a venture capitalist’s perspective, the ideal entrepreneur,
Understand the need for a team with a variety of skill and therefore sees why
equity has to be allocated to other people
Works diligently toward a goal but maintains flexibility
Get along with the investor group
Understands the cost of capital and typical deal structures and is not offended by
them
Is sought after by many VCs
Has a realistic expectation about process and outcome.
Besides the ideal entrepreneur, the investor tries to ensure the following for himself.
The venture capitalists usually take into account the following factors while deciding on
the investment.
1. Track record of the promoters and the management team is the single most important
factor. It is often said that three most important considerations in selecting the venture
capital investment are “Management”, “Management” and “Management”. Venture
capitalists look for a track record in terms of the successes of the promoters in their
previous vocations, whatever these might have been. They put their bets on successful
people and avoid those who have tasted failures earlier.
A venture capital fund manager does not take more than ten minutes to decide if the
management quality is not okay. The two key points a venture capital manager sees are
weather the entrepreneur has a vision and whether the management team is cohesive.
Here he looks for various questions like:
2. The nature of the business and the promoters experience in the proposed or related
business is an important consideration. Venture capitalists are the firm believer of the
Corridor Principal1 that states that the probability of the venture‘s success is high when
the business falls in the corridor of the entrepreneur‘s previous vocation or education.
3. The business should meet the investment objectives of the venture capitalist in terms of
risk profile, the return and the time horizon of the fund. In case of closed ended funds, if
the venture capital has earned a substantial return in the first round of investments, it is
more open to investments with comparatively higher risk. In the initial investment rounds
of a fund the venture capitalist is normally willing to take a longer term exposure as
compared the later rounds when the fund is nearing maturity. In the later rounds the
venture capitalist goes in for balancing investments.
4. The funds normally invest in select industries where they have the knowledge and
expertise. This helps then in providing value added services to the investee companies.
5. Project cost, scheme for financing and financial projections over next few years,
including details of underlying assumptions are closely studied, The resultant Internal
rate of return (IRR) must meet the minimum fixed by the venture capitalist as the hurdle
rate. The IRR is adjusted for any protection, the venture might be enjoying in the form of
subsidy or any other concession from any government or statutory body. This is to ensure
the inherent earning potential of the investment in spite of policy changes by the
government.
6. Marketing strategy, including target market, market survey, marketing effort, market
size and growth potential also effect the decision.
Most of the venture capital firms do not want an introduction from any one. A business
proposal that is well prepared is the best introduction that one can ha‘ye. Most venture
capital firms are interested in good investments and not in social contacts and
introductions.
A detailed and well-organized business plan is the only way to gain a venture capitalist
attention and obtain funding. VCs do not invest in a two page summery. The summary is
needed as a start but not as a substitute for a sound plan. A well prepared business plan
Page61
serves two functions. Firstly it informs the venture capitalists about the entrepreneur‘s
ideas, secondly it shows that the entrepreneur has seriously thought about the intended
business, knows the industry and has thought through all the potential problems.
The summary should contain the name, address and telephone number of the contact
persons in a conspicuous location. Briefly the type of business or nature of industry
should be discussed. This should be followed by a thumb nail sketch of the company‘s up
to date history. The experience of the entrepreneurs and the top management personal
should be mentioned. A short description of product or service is required. The amount of
funds and the form in which required should also be given. Summary of five years
financial projections and five years history of existing group companies should be
appended. Besides the exit plan should also be mentioned.
II. Management
1. Directors and Officers
2. Key Employees
3. Remunerations
4. Conflict of Interest
Page61
1. Financial Projections
2. Ratio Analysis
3. Contingent Liability
Venture capital firms in India usually have either a fixed format or guidelines on how to
present a proposal and the information they are looking for.
In case of IDBI the factors taken into account while appraising the project include the
technology development content. The commercial aspects such as cost advantage of the
proposed technology, market potential, demand supply gap, and the availability of
management team well versed in various disciplines.
Page61
Indus venture capital fund usually accepts the project report prepared as per the format
prescribed by the financial institutions as in most cases the project will have been
received and appraised by the institution before it comes to Indus Investment Fund.
Customer is asked to bear the transaction cost relating to investment by Fund including
any professional fee of accountants, solicitors etc. In the - proposal or project report, they
look for the background and performance record of promoters, nature of promoters
business, summary of the project cost and the amount of money sought, information on
loan and bank facilities, other equity participants, details of government approvals
required for the project and their current status, details of management team and its
experience, outline of product, market size, strategy and marketing plan, summary of
premises, production and general operations, financial projections covering five years
period, cash flow forecasts. Details of financial operations of the existing group
companies for last five years particularly audited figures and forecast for the current year
are also sought.
IFCI Venture also has a detailed Techno Economic evaluation and takes help of outside
experts whenever required. The format prescribed by them includes name and address of
the organization, write up on promoters and their background, particulars of the company
structure, R & D set up, project / feasibility report, market survey report, production
process / technology, status / stage of development of technology, advantages of the
proposed project over existing products, scope of commercial exploitation, proposed
strategy for achieving the objective including specific approach for such tasks, as
technology inputs, design, development, prototype development and production, large
scale production, testing, evaluation, manufacturing arrangement for up gradation to
commercial scald economic scale of production, manpower development, market
penetration and also likely constraints and how these are proposed to be overcome;
details of government‘s consents, cost of project and proposed means of financing,
organization chart for the company and the project, responsibility centers, bio-data of key
personals, sales forecasts, profitability projections, cash flow statements and amount and
type of assistance required from IFCI Ventures.
ICICI venture considers investment on the basis of four important aspects. First is the
sound management team whose members have established track records with displayed
ability, dedication and integrity. Second is the large and rapidly growing market
opportunity. Scope for international marketing of the product or service is considered an
added advantage. Third is the long term competitive advantage that would pose entry
barriers to competition. This could be in terms of quality, performance or cost over
substitute and competitive products. Finally it is the potential for above average
profitability leading to attractive return over a longer period.
The criterions used by APIDC Venture Capital Fund in selecting the investee company
include several factors. The quality, depth, maturity and experience of management or
exposure in the industry in which the assisted concern proposes to implement the project
are factored in. In case of project by first generation entrepreneur, the experience,
qualification and depth of knowledge of the relevant lines and the efforts put in by the
entrepreneur are considered. The other factors are innovativeness of the technology /
process, its advantage over the existing technology / process, the resultant benefits that
Page61
may accrue on account of the new technology and process; in case of existing products,
the potential size of the market with long term growth prospects, existence of clear
demand supply gap over the period of investment or advantage available to the assisted
concern for marketing its product over its competitors; in case of innovative product the
competitive advantage of such product over existing products, the potential for
replacement and estimate of such replacement demand; in case of new products its
uniqueness and innovation to give competitive edge over the existing products.
With the maturity of venture capital industry the decision to invest now hinges on four
criteria, each of which must be satisfied before the venture capitalist commits his funds.
A host of new breed private sector and offshore funds during due diligence follow a four
point criteria as under:
1. Fundamental Analysis
A detailed fundamental analysis of the enterprise and the industry is considered essential.
The fundamental analysis at the minimum should consider the following:
An objective analysis of the fundamental risk and the management‘s plan to cope
with these.
2. Financial Analysis
Indian venture capital firms use financial analysis to look at the financial implications of
the company‘s strategy and to measure its performance. Venture capitalists use this to
determine:
3. Portfolio Analysis
The initial investment decision also depends upon the venture capitalist‘s portfolio
balance at the time the investment proposal is being considered. That is the proposed
investment must be an acceptable addition to venture capitalist‘s portfolio in terms of its
size, its stage of development, its geographic location and its industry sector. Many
venture capital firms avoid seed startup or early stage propositions for fundamental
reasons, while a growing number of venture capitalists are wary of irrational and
depressed IPO markets in India and hence avoid Buyout / Buying.
4. Disinvestment Analysis
It is vital that the venture capitalist keeps his mind on exit at all times; clear idea as to the
method, the timing and the valuation of the company upon disinvestment. Indian venture
capital funds have faced maximum problem in this respect. Presently the exit plan is
finalized and agreed upon before the venture capital fund commits investment.
Till 1998 foreign venture capital funds were not convinced that money could be made in
India and concerns existed on the exit options, The successful exit of ICICI ventures and
some other domestic funds have acted as a trigger in attracting a number of foreign
Page61
Structuring A Deal
During structuring a deal venture capital in India has faced two specific problems,
namely:
Financing Instruments
The type of financing available from the Indian venture capitalists was mainly equity or
debt or a combination of both. Due to the rigid rules in India, the Indian venture capital
firms do not have the flexibility that UK or US venture capitalists have in innovating new
investment instruments. PACT and TDICI (earlier versions of ICICI Ventures) were first
to use “royalty on sales” in Indian venture capital. Herein the investee company is
provided conditional loan that is serviced through a percentage of sales as royalty if the
venture succeeds and the amount is written off if it fails. Of late with the relaxation of the
regulation and the maturity of the venture capital industry innovative financing
instruments are now available. ICICI venture has introduced optionally and partially
convertible debentures. Share warrants have been used to bring down prices. ICICI and
some other funds have provided bridge finance to the assisted companies. Over the last
five years Indian venture capitalists have become more flexible.
In the five year period 1993-98 venture capital investment in the form of non convertible
debt has reduced from 36 percent to 7 percent. Some funds invest using only one or two
instruments; others use a variety of instruments In India only 20 percent venture capital
firms use just one type of instrument, while 30 percent use two types of instruments. A
few funds use even five types of investment instruments.
Page61
Monitoring
All venture capitalists in India practice hands on active monitoring. 17 venture capital
firms provided information about their monitoring practice. 15 respondents claimed
active monitoring while one called its monitoring approach as proactive. Only one fund is
believed to be following a passive / hands off approach. ICICI Ventures follows a mid
way approach. Almost all the domestic funds nominate their representatives on the Board
of Directors of the investee companies. Offshore funds are not that particular about their
nominee on the Board of the investee company, however they are very particular on
regular monitoring. In terms of value added services most of the Indian venture capital
funds provide only financial advice and a few of them provide management inputs.
According to the views of the assisted entrepreneurs the contribution of the nominee
directors particularly from the public sector funds is lacklustre except in the area of
financial management. Very few funds are able to provide a real value addition through
networking. However some of the state sector venture funds do provide good support in
interfacing with state agencies and are helpful in arranging additional funds from state
industrial development and financial institutions.
Gujarat Venture Finance Ltd. supported Saraf Foods, an investee company in many ways
— by arranging for finance when the company was in need of it, getting technical
problems sorted out when the pilot project had teething problems. It stood behind Suresh
Saraf, the promoter of Saraf Foods even while the company was not making profits in the
first couple of years. It also encouraged the company to expand.3 DHL decided to go in
for venture capital funding, its aim was not only to correct the debt equity structure of the
company but also find a partner who could help them introduce the best practices in
financial management. It wanted to hive off its international travel business and wanted
to choose a partner to do due diligence for it. It chose Bankers Trust as its venture
capitalist which also helped DHL, in Y2K compliance and in its financial management.
Comprehensive Study
Page61
4.1 Alternatives to VC Funding
Low High
LEVEL OF RISK
Simply put, venture capital is not the right fit for our business and there are plenty of
other options available when it comes to finding capital.
1. Angels
Most venture capital funds will not consider investing in anything under $1 million to $2
million. Angels, however, are wealthy individuals who will provide capital for a startup
business. These investors have usually earned their money as entrepreneurs and business
managers and can serve as a prime resource for advice on top of capital. On the other
hand, due to typically limited resources, angels usually have a shorter investment horizon
than venture capitalists and tend to have less tolerance for losses.
2. Private Placement
An investment bank or agent may be able to raise equity for our company by placing our
unregistered securities with accredited investors. However, you should be aware that the
fees and expenses associated with this practice are generally higher than those that come
with venture and angel investors. We will likely receive little or no business counsel from
private investors who also tend to have little tolerance for losses and under-performance.
If we are somehow able to gain access to public equity markets than an initial public
offering (IPO) can be an effective way to raise capital. Keep in mind that, while the
public market’s high valuations, abundant capital and liquidity characteristics make it
attractive, the transaction costs are high and there are ongoing legal expenses associated
with public disclosure requirements.
1. Bootstrap Financing
This method is intended to develop a foundation for your business from scratch.
Financial management is essential to make this work. With bootstrap financing you’re
building a business from nothing, which means there is little to no margin for error in the
finance department. Keep a rigid account of all transactions and don’t stray from your
budget.
Factoring, which generates cash flow through the sale of your accounts receivable to a
“factor” at a discounted price for cash.
Trade Credit is an option if you are able to find a vendor or supplier that will allow you
to order goods on net 30, 60 or 90 day terms. If you can sell the goods before the bill
comes due then you have generated cash flow without spending any money. Customers
can pay you up front our services.
Look for ways to tweak your business in order to reduce the cash flowing out and
increase the cash flowing in. Funding found in business operations come free of finance
charges, can reduce future financing charges and can increase the value of your business.
Month-by-month operating and cash projections will show how well we have planned,
how you can optimize the elements of your business that generate cash and allow you to
plan for new investments and contingencies.
3. Licensing
Sell licenses to technology that is non-essential to our company or grant limited licensing
to essential technology that can be shared. Through out licensing we can generate
revenue from up-front fees, access fees, royalties or milestone payments.
4. Vendor Financing
Similar to the trade credit related to bootstrap financing, vendors can play a big role in
financing your new business. Establish vendor relationships through our trade association
and strike deals to offer their product and pay for it at a date in the near future. Selling the
product in time is up to us. In hopes of keeping you as a customer, vendors may also be
willing to work out an arrangement if we need to finance equipment or supplies. Just
make sure to look for stability when you research a vendor’s credentials and reputation
before you sign any kind of agreement. And keep in mind that many major suppliers (GE
Small Business Solutions, IBM Global Financing) own financial companies that can help
you.
Page61
5. Self Funding
Search between the couch cushions and in old jacket pockets for whatever extra money
you might have lying around and invest it into your business. Obviously loose change
will not be enough for extra business funding, but take a look at your savings, investment
portfolio, retirement funds and employee buyout options from your previous employer.
You won’t have to deal with any creditors or interest and the return on your investment
could be much higher.
However, make sure that you consider the risks involved with using your own resources.
How competitive is the market that you are about to enter into? How long will it take to
pay yourself back? Will you be able to pay yourself back? Can you afford to lose
everything that you are investing if your business were to fail?
It’s important that your projected returns are more than enough to cover the risk that you
will be taking.
Coordinated by the SBA, SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) and STTR
(Small business Technology Transfer) programs offer competitive federal funding
awards to stimulate technological innovation and provide opportunities for small
businesses. You can learn more about these programs at SBIRworld.com.
7. State Funding
If you’re not having any luck finding funding from the federal government take a
look at what your state has to offer. There is a list of links to state development
agencies that offer an array of grants and financial assistance for small businesses
on About.com.
8. Community Banks
These smaller banks may have fewer products than their financial institution
counterparts but they offer a great opportunity to build banking relationships and
are generally more flexible with payment plans and interest rates.
9. Microloans
These types of loans can range from hundreds of dollars to low six-figure
amounts. Although some lenders regard microloans to be a waste of time because
the amount is so low, these can be a real boon for a startup business or one that
just needs to add some extra cash flow.
Page61
11. Friends
Ask your friends if they have any extra money that they would like to invest.
Assure them that you will pay them back with interest or offer them stock options
or a share of the profits in return.
12. Family
Maybe you have a rich uncle or a wealthy cousin that would be willing to lend
you some money get your business running or send it to the next level. Again,
make it worth their while by offering interest, stocks or a share of the profits.
Aligning your business with a corporation can produce funding from upfront or
access fees to your service, milestone payments and royalties. In addition,
corporate partners may be able to provide research funding, loans and equity
investments.
Find an interested party to buy some of your assets (computers, equipment, real
estate, etc…) and then lease them back to you. This provides an instant source of
cash and you will still be able to use whatever assets you need.
If your business has positive cash flow and has proven that it will cover its debts
then you may be eligible for a business line of credit. This type of financing is a
common service offered by most business banks and serves as business capital, up
to an agreed upon amount, that you can access at any time.
Using personal credit cards to finance a business can be risky but, if you take the
right approach, they can also give your business a lift. You should only consider
using this type of financing for acquiring assets and working capital. Never
consider this to be a long-term option. Once your company breaks even or moves
into the black, ditch the credit cards and move toward traditional bank financing
or lease agreements.
Page61
17. Business Credit Cards
Business credit cards carry similar risks as personal credit cards but tend to be a
safer alternative. While the activity on this card goes toward your credit report, a
business credit card can help you to build business credit, keep your business
expenses separate from your personal expenses and can make tax season easier to
manage.
Knowledge become the key factor for a competitive advantage for company. Venture
Capital firms need more expert knowledge in various fields. The various key success
factor for venture capital industry are as follow:
Investment, management and exit should provide flexibility to suit the business
requirements and should also be driven by global trends. Venture capital investments
have typically come from high net worth individuals who have risk taking capacity. Since
high risk is involved in venture financing, venture investors globally seek investment and
exit on very flexible terms which provides them with certain levels of protection. Such
exit should be possible through IPOs and mergers/acquisitions on a global basis and not
just within India. In this context the judgement of the judiciary raising doubts on
treatment of tax on capital gains made by firms registered in Mauritius gains significance
- changing policies with a retrospective effect is undoubtedly acting as a dampener to
fresh fund raising by Venture capital firms.
The company have flat organization structure results in quicker decision making. The
entrepreneur is relieved of the trauma that one normally goes through in an interface with
a funding institution or a development agency. They follow a clearly defined decision
making process that works with clock like precision, which means that if they agree on a
funding schedule entrepreneur can count on them to stick it.
With increasing global integration and mobility of capital it is important that Indian
venture capital firms as well as venture financed enterprises be able to have opportunities
for investment abroad. This would not only enhance their ability to generate better returns
Page61
but also add to their experience and expertise to function successfully in a global
environment.
Good Human Resource :
Venture Capital backed companies can provide high returns. However, despite of success
stories like Apple, FedEx of Microsoft, a lot of these deals fail. It is said that only one out
of ten companies succeed. That's why every deal has an element of potential profit and an
element of risk, depending on the deals size. To be successful, a Venture Capital
Company must manage the balance between these three factors.
Knowledge is key, to get the balance in this "Magic Triangle". With knowledge we mean
Page61
knowledge about the financial markets and the industries to invest in, risk management
skills and contacts to investors, possible investees and external expertise. High profits,
achievable by larger deals, are not only important for the financial performance of the
Venture Capital company. As a good track record they are also a vital argument to attract
funds which are the basis for larger deals. However, larger deals imply higher risks of
losses. Many Venture Capital companies try to share and limit their risks. Solutions could
be alliances and careful portfolio management. There are Venture Capital firms that
refuse to invest in e-start-up's because they perceive it as too risky to follow today's type.
The emerging scenario of global competitiveness has put an immense pressure on the
Page61
industrial sector to improve the quality level with minimization of cost of products by
making use of latest technological skills. The implication is to obtain adequate financing
along with the necessary hi-tech equipments to produce an innovative product which can
succeed and grow in the present market condition. Unfortunately, our country lacks on
both fronts. The necessary capital can be obtained from the venture capital firms who
expect an above average rate of return on the investment. Government of India
understands this.
Also, The Government of India in an attempt to bring the nation at par and above the
developed nations has been promoting venture capital financing to new, innovative
concepts & ideas, liberalizing taxation norms providing tax incentives to venture firms,
giving an opportunity for the creation of local pools of capital and holding training
sessions for the emerging VC investors.
In the year 2000, the finance ministry announced the liberalization of tax treatment for
venture capital funds to promote them & to increase job creation. This is expected to give
a strong boost to the non resident Indians located in the Silicon Valley and elsewhere to
invest some of their capital, knowledge and enterprise in these ventures.
To boost the micro and small enterprise sector, the bank has decided to refinance
an amount of 7000 crore to the Small Industries Development Bank of India,
which will be available up to March 31, 2010. The Central Bank said that it is also
working on a similar refinance facility for the National Housing Bank (NHB) of an
amount of Rs 4, 000 crore.
Bangalore
• All IP-led companies; IT and IT-enabled services
Page61
Delhi (NCR)
• Software services, IT enabled services, Telecom
Mumbai
• Software services, IT enabled services, Media, Computer
Graphics, Animation, Banking
4.5.2 Threats:
The Venture Capital market in India seems to be getting as hot as the country’s famous
summers. However, this potential over-exuberance may lead to some stormy days ahead,
based on sobering research compiled by global research and analytics services firm,
Evalueserve. Evalueserve research shows an interesting phenomenon is beginning to
emerge:
Over 44 US-based Venture capital firms are now seeking to invest heavily in start-ups
and early-stage companies in India. These firms have raised, or are in the process of
raising, an average of US $100 million each. Indeed, if these 40-plus firms are successful
in raising money, they would garner approximately $4.4 billion to be invested during the
next 4 to 5 years. Taking Indian Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) into consideration, this
would be equivalent to $22 billion worth of investment in the US. Since about $1.75
billion (or approximately 40% of $4.4 billion) has been already raised, even if only $2.2
billion is raised by December 2006, Evalueserve cautions that there will be a glut of
Venture Capital money for early stage investments in India. This will be especially true if
the VCs continue to invest only in currently favorite sectors such as IT, BPO, software
and hardware products, telecom, and consumer Internet. Given that a typical start-up in
India would require $9 million during the first three years (i.e., $3 million per year) and
even assuming that the start-up survives for three years, investing $2.2 billion during
2007-2010 would imply investing in 150 to 180 start-ups every year during this period,
Page61
which simply does not seem practical if the VCs continue to focus only on their current
favorite sectors.
Unproductive workforce:
A global survey by McKinsey & Company revealed that Indian business leaders are
much more optimistic about the future than their international peers. So Indian employees
are tardy in their job so it will effect reversely on the economic condition of the country.
Because they are unproductive to the economy of the country.
Due to crash down of market by 51% from January to November 2008. It create a
problem for venture capital firms. Because Nobody is trying to come up with IPO and
IPO is the exit route for Venture Capital.
As per Union Budget 2007 and its broad guidelines, Government proposed to limit pass-
through status to venture capital funds (VCFs) making investment in nine areas. These
nine areas are biotechnology, information technology, nanotechnology, seed research and
development, R&D for pharmaceuticals sectors, dairy industry, poultry industry and
production of bio-fuels. Pass-through status means that the incomes earned by funds are
taxable now.
Buoyed by the growing tribe of students wanting to go solo with their own
entrepreneurial venture, the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
(IIM-A) is looking to attract venture capital funds to the campus. The
premier management institute is also in talks with several corporates to
provide seed capital to budding entrepreneurs from its incubation lab.
Source: Business Daily from THE HINDU group of publications Sunday, Jan 27, 2008
Angel investors betting big on Indian start
Venture Capitalists could also assists small ancillary units to upgrade their technologies
so that they could be in line with the development taking place in their parent companies.
Yet another area where VCFs can play a significant role in developing countries is the
service sector including tourism, publishing, healthcare etc.
They could also provide assistance to people coming out of the universities, technical
institutes etc. who wish to start their own venture with or without high-tech content, but
involving high risk. This would encourage entrepreneurial spirit.
It is not the initial funding which is needed from venture capitalist, but they should also
simultaneously provide management and marketing expertise- a real critical aspect of
Page61
venture capital in developing countries. VCFs can improve their effectiveness by setting
up venture capital cells in R&D and other scientific organizations, providing syndicated
or consortium financing and acting as business incubators.
In sum, venture capital, by combining risk financing with management and marketing
assistance, could become an effective instrument in fostering development of
entrepreneurship and transfer of technology in developing countries.
The experiences of developed countries and the detailed case study of venture capital in
India, however indicate that that the following elements are needed for the success of
venture capital in any country.
Fiscal incentives: Fiscal incentives which render the equity investment more and
develop equity cult in investors.
R&D activities: Encouragement and funding of R&D by private and public sector
Page61
The study provides that the maturity if the still nascent Indian Venture Capital market is
imminent.
Venture Capitalists in Indian have notice of newer avenues and regions to expand. VCs
have moved beyond IT service but are cautious in exploring the right business model, for
finding opportunities that generate better returns for their investors.
Therefore Venture capitalists responses are upbeat about the attractiveness of the India as
a place to do the business.
Page61
Bibliography
Books
Reports
Website:
www.sebi.gov.in
www.ivca.org
www.nenonline.org
www.indiavca.org
www.vcindia.com
www.ventureintelligence.in
www.vccircle.com
www.indiape.com
Page61
www.nvca.org
www.nasscom.org
www.Economictimes.indiatimes.com
www.100ventures.com
www.msme.com
www.planningcommission.nic.in
Page61