You are on page 1of 65

Making

Field
Recordings
with
Omid
Bürgin
a b a sic su r v i v al g ui d e
Different
Markets

recording archiving
+ +
documentation preserving
Before going
into the field
1. Theoretical Background
Early 20th
Century

Comparative
musicology
1950’s

Ethno-musicology
or
Ethnomusicology
Music in Culture in
Culture Music

1960’s
Classical
?
Rumba
Indians

1970’s
Rock!
Indians!

Jazz!
Feminist!

1980’s
Today

Whatever!!!
Before After

1year
field work
2weeks
field work

inclusive concentrated
?
2. Methodology
Planning is
everything
Technical setup
+ equipment
Cultural
preparation
Grants
Burocracies...
Health
Issues
Organology
Cosmology
3. Mehinaku
Representation
& Interpretation
4. Circular Space Time
DIVINITIES

MAN

NATURE
Nature
Woman
Family
Social
?
5. Repertoire
Cosmology

Music

Instrument
People
Initiation
Open
Kuarup

Yamuricumã

Kwat Yaí

Ear Piercing Ritual

Xamãs Ritual

Forbbiden Flutes

Closed
Kuarup
Yamuricumã
Kwat Yaí
Ear Piercing Ritual
Xamã Ritual
Kauká
the forbbiden flutes
Forbbiden
flutes
6. Recording
Performance

Stage
Performance

Separation
Kaukaten
Takuara
Acoustics
Recording Techniques
Analitical Recording
Stereo Techniques
Without body separator

• 2 microphones in figure-8
• NOS (radio Holland) is similar to ORTF
• w/ 30cm distance, 90 o angle • variation of the ORTF setup
• Main difference is in the wide distance of 30cm
• represents the depth of the sound being recorded • smaller angle (90o)
• NOS sounds better in a wider room than ORTF or DIN
• Stereo signal contains correct phasing, and intensity • but larger distance (20cm)
• Tends to have problems with mono compatibility
differences • Sound-body will have very similar
• Does not represent the Center very well
• Emphasizes Mids results to ORTF
• NOS works if a greater distance is required
• Works well for reverberant rooms
• Layers of depth of sound body same as ORTF or DIN
• Great for Ribbon Microphones

• 2 microphones in figure-8
• use of 2 hyper-cardioid
• w/ 90 o angle
• 2 Omni-directional microphones • w/ distance of 5cm
• w/ 30-50 cm distance
• w/ 50cm distance • w/ 135o angle
• separated with separation disc
• Microphones need to have linear diffusion field • sound characteristics and room-representation depends
• separation disc about 50cm
• Angle depends (between 45 – 60o) greatly on microphone type
• great separation of L/R
• great for acoustics not-so-good sounding rooms
Stereo Techniques
With body separator

• 2 microphones in figure-8
• w/ 90 o angle • 2 microphones are attached to a spherical body,
• w/ 30-50 cm distance which acts as separation disc
• separated with separation disc • Omni-directional Microphones
• separation disc about 50cm • Great use of Omni directional microphones
• great separation of L/R

• 2 omni-directional Microphones
• 2 omni-directional Microphones
• 2 cardioid Microphones, directed towards the back, as close
• w/ 36cm distance
as possible to omni-directional Microphones
• 35cm separation disc, covered with acoustic foam
• Better representation of Side information
• Great use of Omni directional microphones
• Better representation of Room Reverb/Depth
• Generally 60 o angle
• Good use for large sound bodies (i.e. Symphony Orchestra)
7. Perspective
View

Feminist Cosmological

Musical Native
Perspective
Perspective

Native Producers
8. After the Field
Publishing your
material
Copyright
issues
Archiving and
sound archives
Using
Material
for Creative
Purpose

You might also like