Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rushi Ahuja
Generation of Ideas
Adequacy of Market
Fostering a conducive culture Availability of inputs
Note - For details, refer Chapter 3 of book “Projects – Planning, Analysis Selection, Financing,
Implementation and Review “ by Prasanna Chandra
Rushi Ahuja 2
Market & Demand Analysis
Breakdown of demand
Demand Forecasting Price
Government Policy
Rushi Ahuja 3
Market & Demand Analysis
Demand Forecasting
Casual Methods
These methods are more analytical than the above mentioned methods. These methods
seek to develop forecast based on cause and effect relationship specified in an explicit,
quantitative manner. Following are the important methods:
Chain Ratio Method Leading Indicator Method
Consumption Level Method Econometric Method
End Use Method
Note - For details, refer Chapter 4 of book “Projects – Planning, Analysis Selection, Financing,
Implementation and Review “ by Prasanna Chandra Rushi Ahuja 4
Technical Analysis
1. Choice of Technology : Choice of technology is influenced by the following factors:
Plant Capacity Product Mix
Principal Inputs Latest Developments
Investment Outlay and production costs Ease of absorption
Use by other units
4. Product Mix: Choice of Product Mix is guided by the market requirements. While planning the
production facilities some flexibility in product mix should be sought
5. Plant Capacity : Following factors have bearing on the plant capacity decision:
Technological requirement Market conditions
Input constraints Resources of the firm
Investment costs Government Policy
Rushi Ahuja 5
Technical Analysis
6. Location and Site : Choice of site location is influenced by following factors:
Proximity to the source of raw materials Labour Situation
Proximity to markets Government Policies
Availability of infrastructure Other factors like climatic & living conditions
10. Charts and Layouts: Charts and layouts define the scope of the project and provide the basis of
detailed engineering and estimation of investment and production costs
2. Cost of Capital : :
Cost of Debt – Redeemable and Irredeemable
Cost of Preference – Redeemable and Irredeemable
Cost of Equity – Dividend growth model & CAPM
Overall/weighted average cost of capital
4. Estimating Cash-flows:
Estimating Cash flows of a normal project
Estimating cash-flows of a replacement project
Note - For detailed notes, refer to a separate handout – FM Section2 and Section3
Rushi Ahuja 7
Risk Analysis
1. Risk Adjusted Discount Rate (RADR) : In this approach, discount rate of the Project is
adjusted for Risk. Higher the risk, higher is the discount rate used for determining the NPV of the
Project. Following are the calculation steps
Calculate RADR which is = Risk Free Rate of Return + Risk Premium
Calculate Present Value of Cash Flows using RADR as discount rate
The Project which gives positive NPV, should be selected
2. Certainty Equivalent Quotient (CEQ): In this approach, Cash flows of the project are adjusted
for risk instead of the discount rate. Discount rate used is the risk free rate of return instead of
weighted average cost of capital. Following are the calculation steps
Multiply the Cash Flows with CEQ to find out risk adjusted cash flows
Use Risk free rate of return as discounting factor for determining the NPV of the Project
The Project which gives positive NPV, should be selected
Rushi Ahuja 8
Risk Analysis
4. Optimistic, Most Likely and Pessimistic Estimates: In this approach, cash flows under
Optimistic, Most Likely and Pessimistic scenarios are analysed. Following are the steps:
If it’s a optimistic scenario, then review the maximum cash flows of each project and select the
one which has the highest cash flow. (follow MaxiMax rule)
If it’s a pessimistic scenario, then review the minimum cash flows of each project and select the
one which has the highest cash flow. (follow MaxiMin rule)
5. Standard Deviation: In this approach, risk of each project is measured using coefficient of
variation. Higher the coefficient of variation(CV), higher is the risk. Following are the calculation steps
Calculate Standard Deviation of each project using the following formula
SD = ∑ (X-X)2p
Calculate coefficient of variation of each project using the following formula
CV = SD/EV
The Project which gives lowest CV hence lower risk should be selected
6. Sensitivity Analysis: Under this approach, sensitivity of NPV of cash flows is examined under
various scenarios like increase in costs, decrease in selling price etc. It is then determined as to which
factor NPV is most sensitive to.
7. Decision Tree: it’s a diagrammatic presentation of various possible decisions. Each decision is
followed by an outcome and for each outcome Expected Value (EV)is calculated . The decision which
gives highest EV is selected.
Rushi Ahuja 9
Project Scheduling
Project Scheduling is the process of organising the activities to be under taken in a project , in a logical
sequence. Schedule activities can be logically sequenced with proper precedence relationships, as well
as leads and lags to support later development of a realistic and achievable project schedule. Project
sequencing can be performed using Network diagrams or Gnatt Charts.
Network Diagrams
Network diagrams are schematic displays of the project’s schedule activities and the logical relationships
among them, also referred to as dependencies. An example is shown below
Rushi Ahuja 10
Project Scheduling
Time Estimation
The process of estimating schedule activity durations uses information on schedule activity scope of work,
required resource types, estimated resource quantities, and resource calendars with resource
availabilities. The inputs for the estimates of schedule activity duration originate from the person or group
on the project team who is most familiar with the nature of the work content in the specific schedule
activity. Generally 3 estimates are obtained for each activity; Optimistic time (to); Most Likely Time (tm);
Pessimistic Time (tp)
Once the 3 time estimates are obtained, average time is estimated using the following formula:
te = (to + 4tm + tp)/6
Determination of Float
Total Float = LOT of succeeding event - EOT of preceding Event - Duration of the activity
Free Float = EOT of succeeding event - EOT of preceding Event - Duration of the activity
Independent Float = EOT of succeeding event - LOT of preceding Event - Duration of the activity
Rushi Ahuja 11
Project Scheduling
Tools for evaluating Schedules
Program Evaluation & Review Technique (PERT) – This technique is used for determining variability of Project duration.
Variability is measured using standard deviation. Following steps are involved:
Determine standard deviation of duration of each activity on the critical path using the following formula:
SD of activity = (tp - to)/6
Determine standard deviation of total duration of critical path on the basis of information obtained in the above step
(Sum of SD of activities on critical path)2
Critical path Method (CPM): The critical path method is a schedule network analysis technique that is performed using the
schedule model. While PERT is used for projects characterised by uncertainty, CPM is used for relatively risk free projects.
PERT is more probabilistic in nature whereas PERT is more deterministic. Principal focus of CPM is on variations in activity
times as a result of changes in resource assignments. The main thrust of CPM analysis is on time cost relationships and it
seeks to determine the project schedule which minimises total cost.
Schedule Compression: Schedule compression shortens the project schedule without changing the project scope, to meet
schedule constraints, imposed dates, or other schedule objectives. Schedule compression techniques include:
Crashing: Schedule compression technique in which cost and schedule tradeoffs are analyzed to determine how to obtain
the greatest amount of compression for the least incremental cost. Crashing does not always produce a viable alternative
and can result in increased cost.
Fast tracking: A schedule compression technique in which phases or activities that normally would be done in sequence
are performed in parallel. An example would be to construct the foundation for a building before all the architectural
drawings are complete. Fast tracking can result in rework and increased risk. This approach can require work to be
performed without completed detailed information, such as engineering drawings. It results in trading cost for time, and
increases the risk of achieving the shortened project schedule.
Rushi Ahuja 12