Arab Spring threatens freedom of movement in Schengen area

The Schengen area, which guarantees free movement

across and between 22 European Union members and
3 non-EU countries, has encountered unexpected
difficulties in the wake of the protests that have swept
the Middle East and North Africa, and gained the
moniker Arab Spring.

Furthermore, new rules may soon be adopted to allow

member states to reinstate border checks.

France created a precedent when more than 25,000 Tunisians, who had fled to Italy to
escape the “democratic revolution” that Europe welcomed so cheerfully, decided to
cross into France. Since they are illegal immigrants without money or documents
necessary to reside in the EU, this left the Italian government with something of a
conundrum. Granting them refugee status involves committing to provide them with
some form of support, however basic, whereas deporting them to their home country
would be inhumane.

Eventually, the Italian government found a solution: it issued them with temporary
residence permits which allow the holders to move freely around the EU (excluding
Bulgaria, Romania and Cyprus), as well as through Schengen member states such as
Iceland, Norway, Switzerland and Liechtenstein.

Since Tunisia is a former French colony and most Tunisians speak French, they
logically decided to cross into France.

However, the French authorities intercepted them on trains and sent them back to
Italy, outraging the Italians.

This created a trilateral conflict, with France and Italy trading accusations and also
complaining to the European Commission in Brussels.

Twenty-five thousand immigrants is a drop in the ocean for Europe, which has a
combined population of 400 million people. Furthermore, European leaders were
lightning-fast to praise the Arab Spring, the very event that these Tunisians are fleeing.
“It is unacceptable that the arrival of a few tens of thousands of immigrants at the
borders of countries which are among the largest in Europe and are founder members
of European integration should serve as an excuse to question Schengen, the free
movement of people and our common policy of freedom, security and justice. It is also
unacceptable that this is so obviously happening as a result of highly populist anti-
European pressures. All this sends a discouraging message, one which is deeply
negative and contrary to the Europe that we need,” said Juan Fernando Lopez
Aguilar, chairman of the EU Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.

But French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi
have sent a discouraging message, thereby showing once again that modern Europe is
not prepared to back up its rhetoric with either action or funds.

As if to confirm this, the European Commission has now taken France’s side in its
quarrel with Italy, saying that under Article 25 of the Schengen Borders Code each
member state “may exceptionally and immediately reintroduce border control at
internal borders … when there is a serious threat to public policy or internal security.”

It looks like the European Commission has yielded to Sarkozy’s pressure. He was
acting from a purely populist standpoint. Back as France’s Interior Minister, he forged
his political career in his fight against illegal immigration.

In Italy, Umberto Bossi, who leads the Northern League party which calls for
autonomy or independence for Northern Italy and is one of Berlusconi’s allies in the
ruling coalition, said that Italy has become a French colony.

Bossi made his career by demanding the deportation of immigrants from Italy, in
particular from its industrialized northern regions.

All this amounts to a serious potential for conflict that weighs heavily on Schengen
countries ahead of June’s EU Council meeting, where they are to consider admitting
Romania and Bulgaria into the Schengen area.

France and Britain have long insisted that Romania must tighten control over its
border with Moldova, while Sarkozy deported Roma Gypsies to Romania.

If Romania and Bulgaria are admitted to the Schengen zone, the decision is likely to be
accompanied by numerous amendments to the Schengen Agreement that would
seriously undermine the idea of the freedom of movement.
At the same time, the idea of reuniting Romania and Moldova, which is so popular in
Bucharest, may well be denounced as a nationalist utopia.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s and do not necessarily represent those of
RIA Novosti.

This article first appeared in RIA Novosti.