Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FY2012‐FY2013 Biennium
(As passed by State Senate on May 3, 2011)
Aid to Municipalities
May 3, 2011
900 Chapel St, 9th Floor, New Haven, CT 06510 z P. 203-498-3000 z F. 203-562-6314 z www.ccm-ct.org
Adopted State Budget
FY2012‐FY2013 Biennium
AID TO MUNICIPALITIES
Page Page
Total Municipal Aid ………………………………………………………… 1 Mashantucket Pequot‐Mohegan Grant …………………………….……..8
Pre‐K to 12 Public Education Grants …………………………….... 2 PILOT: Private Colleges and Hospital Property ............................9
ECS Grant………………………………………………………………………… 3 PILOT: State‐Owned Property …………………………………………………. 10
Excess Cost‐Student Based Grant…………………………………… 4 PILOT: Manufacturing Machinery & Equipment ……………………… 11
State’s Share of Pre‐K to 12 Public Education Costs ……..… 5 DECD PILOT and Tax Abatement Grants …………………………………. 12
Non‐Education Aid ……………………………………………..…………. 6 New Municipal Revenue………………………………………………………… 13
Town Aid Road Grant ……………………………………………………… 7
# # #
If you have questions, please call George Rafael or Jim Finley of CCM at (203) 498‐3000.
Total Municipal Aid
$25,000
Increases Total Municipal Aid by $89 Million 50%
45%
$19,754
$20,000 $19,219 40%
$18,363 $18,309
$17,724
$16,331 35%
$15,499
$15,000 30%
$ Millions
25%
$10,000 20%
$5,000 10%
$2,768 $2,863 $2,727 $2,844 $2,933
$2,459 $2,540
5%
$0 0%
Total State Budget Expenditures (General Fund and Transportation Fund)
Municipal Aid
Municipal Aid as a % of State Spending
Note: Includes proposed new municipal revenues for FY2012, as estimated by OFA and OPM, which are subject to fluctuation. (See page 13 for more
information.)
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
1
Pre‐K to 12 Public Education Grants
Increases Education Aid by $44.7 Million
$25,000 50%
45%
$19,219 $19,754
$20,000 $18,363 $18,309 40%
$17,724
$ Millions
$16,331 35%
$15,499
$15,000 30%
25%
$10,000 20%
15%
13.1% 12.7% 13.0% 13.1% 13.1% 12.7% 12.5%
$5,000 10%
$2,023 $2,082 $2,301 $2,401 $2,406 $2,432 $2,476
5%
$0 0%
Total State Budget Expenditures (General Fund and Transportation Fund)
Pre‐K‐12 Grant Aid
Education Aid as a % of State Spending
Note: Education aid includes operating grant aid that assists towns and cities. School construction, charter schools, and unified school districts are
excluded.
In FY10 and FY11, ECS was partially funded by federal ARRA funds ($540 million). Those funds will be replaced by new state funding in the biennium.
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
2
ECS Grant
Level Funding
12% $200
$182 $180
10%
$160
$140
8%
$120
$ Millions
6% $100
$80 $80
4% $69
$62 $60
$57
$40 $40
2%
$20
$8 $8
0% $0 $0 $0 $0
% Change from Previous Year
$ Increase from Previous Year
Note: In FY10 and FY11, ECS was partially funded by federal ARRA funds ($540 million). Those funds will be replaced by new state funding in the
biennium.
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
3
Excess Cost‐Student Based Grant
Level Funding
$160
$140.0 $139.8 $139.8 $139.8
$140 $129.8
$120 $110.6
$100 $91.9
$ Millions
$80
$60
$40
$20
$0
Note: The Excess Cost ‐ Student Based grant has two components: (1) children whose placement is handled by the Department of Children and Families and
(2) children whose placement is handled by a local school district. For children placed by DCF, municipalities are reimbursed for all costs that exceed the
local school district's average per‐pupil expenditure. For locally placed students, municipalities are reimbursed for all costs that exceed 4.5 times the
district's average per pupil expenditure.
The grant is capped at the level of appropriation, so that if reimbursements cost more than the amount appropriated, municipalities would absorb the
difference.
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
4
State's % Share of Pre‐K to 12 Education Costs
43%
42.20%
42.00%
42%
41.23%
41% 40.70%
40.30% 40.20%
40% 39.50%
39% 38.50%
38.20%
38.00%
38% 37.78%
37%
36%
35%
Note: State funds include all state revenues on behalf of public elementary and secondary education, including state grants, bond funds, and department
expenditures ‐ including the Connecticut Technical High School System, teacher's retirement costs, and unified school district expenditures.
In FY10 and FY11, ECS was partially funded by federal ARRA funds ($540 million). Those funds will be replaced by new state funding in the biennium.
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
5
Non‐Education Aid
Increases Non‐Education Aid by 10.9%
$480
$470 $466.9
$462.9
$458.5 $457.2
$460
$450
$440 $436.1
$ Millions
$430
$420.9
$420
$412.3
$410
$400
$390
$380
Note: Includes proposed new municipal revenues for FY2012, as estimated by OFA and OPM, which are subject to fluctuation. (See page 13 for more
information.)
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
6
Town Aid Road Grant
Level Funding
$31
$30
$29
$ Millions
$29
$28
$28
$28
$27
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
7
Mashantucket Pequot‐Mohegan Grant
$500 Level Funding 100%
$450 90%
$300 60%
$ Millions
$250 50%
$200 40%
$50 10%
$86.3 $86.3 $93.0 $86.3 $61.8 $61.8 $61.8
$0 0%
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
8
PILOT: Private College and Hospital Property
Level Funding
250 0.7
0.4
0.3
100
0.2
50
0.1
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
9
PILOT: State‐Owned Property
Level Funding
250 0.5
44% 0.45
42% $225 $225
40% $225
200 $218 38% 0.4
$194 $209 33% 0.35
33% 33%
$173
150 0.3
$ Millions
0.25
100 0.2
0.15
50 0.1
0.05
$75 $81 $83 $83 $74 $74 $74
0 0
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
10
PILOT: Manufacturing Machinery & Equipment
Increases Grant by $1 Million
$60
$56 $55.3
$54 $53.5
$ Millions
$52
$50.2
$50 $48.9
$47.9
$48
$46
$44
$42
Note: Each taxing district would receive in FY2012 the same amount it received in FY2011. Any taxing district that did not receive a grant in FY2011 due
to filing error would receive an amount equal to its FY2012 estimated payment.
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
11
DECD PILOT and Tax Abatement Grants
Level Funding
$2.5
$2.2 $2.2 $2.2 $2.2 $2.2 $2.2 $2.2
$2.0
$1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7
$1.5
$ Millions
$1.0
$0.5
$0.0
Housing PILOT
Tax Abatement Program
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
12
New Municipal Grants
$51.6 Million in New Grants to Towns and Cities
$60.0
$50.0
$7.2
$40.0
New Regional Performance Incentive Grants
Millions
$30.0
$44.4
$20.0 New Property Tax Relief Grants
$10.0
$0.0
FY2012
Note: A portion of the new revenue from the increased Sales Tax (0.1%) and all of the increased state portion of the Real Estate Conveyance Tax (0.25%)
would be pooled to fund the new Property Tax Relief grants, which would be distributed through a combination of the Property Tax Relief Fund formula and
the population in each municipality. Regional Performance Incentive grants would be funded through an increase in the hotel (1.0%) and car rental (1.0%)
taxes and provided on a competitive basis for regional projects.
Additional municipal revenue will also come from a 3.0% Cabaret Tax and an increase in fines for failing to register a motor vehicle in the proper state. That
revenue would total an estimated $1.7 million statewide in FY2012 and go to the municipality in which the transaction or violation occurs. This new revenue is
in addition to the $51.6 million discussed above.
The budget also makes the current municipal rates of the Real Estate Conveyance Tax permanent, 151 towns would remain at 0.25% and 18 distressed
municipalities would remain at 0.50%. Without any action, the current rates would decrease on July 1, and towns and cities would lose an estimated $22
million in FY2012.
More information on these new revenues will be provided in CCM’s detailed budget analysis.
13
Source: FY12‐FY13 budget proposal as passed by State Senate on May 2, 2011; CCM, May 2011
CCM – THE STATEWIDE ASSOCIATION OF TOWNS AND CITIES
The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is Connecticut's statewide association of towns and cities.
CCM is an inclusionary organization that celebrates the commonalities between, and champions the interests of,
urban, suburban and rural communities. CCM represents municipalities at the General Assembly, before the state
executive branch and regulatory agencies, and in the courts. CCM provides member towns and cities with a wide
array of other services, including management assistance, individualized inquiry service, assistance in municipal
labor relations, technical assistance and training, policy development, research and analysis, publications,
information programs, and service programs such as workers' compensation, liability-automobile-property
insurance, risk management, and energy cost-containment. Federal representation is provided by CCM in
conjunction with the National League of Cities. CCM was founded in 1966.
CCM is governed by a Board of Directors, elected by the member municipalities, with due consideration given to
geographical representation, municipalities of different sizes, and a balance of political parties. Numerous
committees of municipal officials participate in the development of CCM policy and programs. CCM has offices in
New Haven (the headquarters) and in Hartford.
E-mail: ccm@ccm-ct.org
Web Site: www.ccm-ct.org