Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
GEETHA.B.R
04XQCM6030
DECLARATION
I hereby declare that this dissertation work entitled “STOCK MARKET
Dr. T. V. N. Rao, professor Finance and submitted in partial fulfillment for the
BANGALORE UNIVERSITY
I further declare that this project is the result of my own effort and that it
has not been submitted to any other university/institution for the award of any
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This Project report has been made possible through the direct and indirect
cooperation of various people to whom I wish to express my deep sense of
Gratitude.
GUIDE’S CERTIFICATE
Date:
Place: Bangalore Dr. T. V. N. Rao
PRINCIPAL CERTIFICATE
Date:
Place: Bangalore Dr.NAGESH MALAVALLI
PAGE
SERIAL NO CONTENTS
NO
Introduction 7
Methodology
3.1 Research Problem
3.2 Purpose of Study
3.3 Objectives of Study
16-19
Chapter 3 3.4 Data and Sample Size
3.5 Event to be Studied
3.6 Period of Study
3.7 Methodology used
Chapter 5 Summary 53
Chapter 7 Bibliography 55
The interpretation of daily stock prices reaction to various news good or bad is a common
thing in India. Researchers and Analysts often comment about the Reaction of Stock Prices
to various announcements good or bad. The reports appearing in Financial Press is evidence
to this. The greatest amount of research in finance is devoted to the effect of announcement
on share prices .Academicians have studied stock market reaction to certain specific policy
changes by the government . These studies are known as event study it was under taken to
examine how fast the information was incorporated in stock prices. It is of great interest,
then, to understand more precisely how changes in government policy and the stock market
are related. Prices in speculative markets respond sensitively to events, including policy
actions and hints about policy actions, of all kinds.
This study aims at examining the impact of changes in government policy on the share prices
in three different sectors namely Banking, Pharmaceuticals and Information Technology
While academics point to a large body of evidence in support of EMH, an equal amount of
dissension also exists. For example, investors such as Warren Buffett have consistently
beaten the market over long periods of time, which by definition is impossibility according to
the EMH.
There are three common forms in which the Efficient Market Hypothesis is commonly stated
- Weak Form Efficiency, Semi-Strong Form Efficiency and Strong Form Efficiency,
each of which have different implications for how markets works.
WEAK-FORM EFFICIENCY
No excess returns can be earned by using investment strategies based on
historical share prices or other financial data.
Weak-form efficiency implies that no Technical analysis techniques will be
able to consistently produce excess returns.
In a weak-form efficient market current share prices are the best, unbiased,
estimate of the value of the security. Theoretical in nature, weak form efficiency
advocates assert that fundamental analysis can be used to identify stocks that are
undervalued and overvalued. Therefore, keen investors looking for profitable
companies can earn profits by researching financial statements.
STRONG-FORM EFFICIENCY
Share prices reflect all information and no one can earn excess returns.
To test for strong form efficiency, a market needs to exist where investors
cannot consistently earn excess returns over a long period of time. When the topic of
insider trading is introduced, where an investor trades on information that is not yet
publicly available, the idea of a strong-form efficient market seems impossible.
Studies on the US stock market have shown that people do trade on inside
information.
It was also found though that others monitored the activity of those with
inside information and in turn followed, having the effect of reducing any profits that
could be made.
Even though many fund managers have consistently beaten the market, this
does not necessarily invalidate strong-form efficiency. We need to find out how many
managers in fact do beat the market, how many match it, and how many under
perform it. The results imply that performance relative to the market is more or less
normally distributed, so that a certain percentage of managers can be expected to beat
the market. Given that there are tens of thousand of fund managers worldwide, then
having a few dozen star performers is perfectly consistent with statistical
expectations.
EVENT STUDY
What is an event study? An event study, in economics/finance/accounting research, is an
analysis of whether there was a statistically significant reaction in financial markets to past
occurrences of a given type of event that is hypothesized to affect public firms' market
values.
Methodologies vary as to how they calculate and test abnormal returns but most use a
variation on an efficient market model as the root of their calculation. This event study
analysis uses the market model to estimate returns. Efficient market models such as the
random walk, capital asset pricing model (CAPM), constant-mean return model, or
market model all offer alternatives for empirical testing. Efficient market models assume
abnormal return, or the actual ex post return of a security less the normal return, measures the
impact of an event.
Maurice et.al (1977)have conducted a study which presents evidence that the information
contained in quarterly earnings was not fully impounded into the stock prices at the time of
announcement, over the period of study . A Random Sample of 96 firms was chosen from
Industrial Companies listed on New York Stock Exchange. Quarterly Earnings
Announcement and Announcement Dates were collected from Wall Street Journal Weekly
price and Dividend data were also collected. Market Index was Dollar Weighted Index of 96
stocks. Ball and Brown Method of Residual Analysis were used. Earnings Announcement
was classified as Favorable, Neutral and Unfavorable. Conditional Expectancy Model based
upon Security Market Line, is used to find residual weekly return and then index of price
adjusted ment for different categories of announcement is calculated.
Two Naive Expectancy model used are
Model 1 =Ej.q = E j.q^-4
Ej.q= EPS of a firm j in quarter q
Model 2 =Ej.q-Ej.q + (1/3)[(Ej.q ^-1– Ej.q^-5)(Ej.q^- 2 –Ej.q^-5)(Ej.q^-3 –Ej.q^-6)
These residues were used to construct both abnormal performance and cumulative abnormal
performance indices The study suggests that price adjustments to the information concerning
security valuation in unexpected highly favorable quarterly earnings reports are gradual
rather than instantaneous.
Another study by Robert Clark (1980) is with reference to U S Economy where regulated
electric utilities faced financial problems because prices have often increased faster than rates
adjusted to be charged to consumers. In the Presence of this regulatory lag stock holders had
to absorb the differences between revenues and unexpected increase in energy costs
Subsequently many states in the U S economy allowed the use of Fuel Adjustment Clause
(FAC). This clause allows the firm to adjust the prices of electricity charged to consumers at
frequent intervals whenever the prices of fuel deviates from some fixed base price.
The basic result of this indicate that use of FAC in early part of 1970’s reduced systematic
risk of electric utilities in general by approximately 10 %.The results indicate that actual
returns to stock holders after the use of FAC tend to be less than expected but this was due to
the fact that utilities as a whole had negative returns
The period of study was January 1965 to January 1974 the firms investigated are large
electric utilities whose stock has been traded on New York Stock Exchange. The Empirical
Evidence from the paper indicate that the use of fuel adjusted clause by electric utilities in
early part of 1970’s did have an impact on these firms systematic risk as expected .A
decrease in firms systematic risk resulting from use of FAC will decrease the firms cost of
equity . In an efficient market the investors would bid up the prices of the firms share until
expected return confirmed to its corresponding risk the sudden upward movement in share
prices of the firm would result in wind fall gain for existing share holders to test possible
windfall gains we will examine residual returns of stock holders.
The study conducted by Hagerman (1984), et al was to test whether risk adjusted stock
price are a function of magnitude of quarterly earnings informational signals and there is a
Marginal Information effect of annual versus Fourth Quarter Earnings Informational Signals
.This study is an important extension to the Seminial Work conducted by Ball and Brown
which examined association between Quarterly and Annual Earnings forecast errors and Risk
Adjusted Stock Prices.
Moreover Beaver Clarke and Wright who studied association between unsystematic security
returns and Magnitude of Annual Earnings Forecasting Errors .Wall Street Earnings
Announcements dates were collected for Randhom sample of 215 firms over a period of
1974 to 1976 these sample were constrained to be NYSE or ASE firms to have fiscal year
end over the time period and to be listed on COMPUSTAT quarterly industrial tape. Stock
Returns were taken from CRSP daily return file and Quarter Earnings from aforesaid
COMPUSTST tape.
The study assumes that annual earnings follow pure Random Walk Hypothesis and Quarterly
Earnings follow some type of Seasonal Random Walk Hypothesis. Cumulative Risk
Adjusted stock returns are found and three return generating models are used to determine
expected security returns models are Market Model, Mean Return Model and Scholes and
Williams Model. They were tested both for securities and second was for portfolio of 25.
Regression analysis was also used where ever necessary.
The results reported, provide a strong evidence for above study. It also said that fourth
quarterly information signal is more highly associated with risk adjusted stock returns than
annual signals immediately around public release of these contemporaneous information
signals.
The study by Subramaniam (1989) is similar to the above study. The daily closing price of
forty five securities and financial express equity index for the 8 year period between 1/1/1979
to 31/12/1986.The economic times and financial express of period were referred. Fifteen
major political events were identified. The speed of reaction of market factor and 45 scripts
have been computed the mean variance of market factor returns outside the period was
drawn. For individual securities the methodology used was by Fama and Fisher and Jensen.
This market factor and individual securities behavior prior to the occurrence of the event
supports Efficiency Market Hypothesis .However post event adjustment time is on higher
side. The long post event adjustment time around dates of events indicate that the market
may relatively efficient for some kind of events and may be relatively not efficient for some
other events .If the relationship between an event and security prices are characterized by low
complexity and high clarity the market would possibly be more efficient to this events for
other events
RESEARCH PROBLEM:
“Empirical study of Stock Market Reaction to Policy Change Announcements”
PURPOSE OF STUDY
The purpose of this study is to examine the adjustment of stock prices to announcements of
changes in Government Policy .The announcement was in relation to Banking,
Pharmaceuticals and Information Sector. To find strong evidence in supporting of semi
strong form market efficiency a scientific study called event study is conducted. It’s done to
find whether there are any abnormal returns or not. Semi strong form of market efficiency
implies that no abnormal returns should consistently occur after the announcement date.
Several studies done before support this theory
PERIOD OF STUDY
The Period of Study is different for 3 Sectors:
For Banking Sector it’s from 10th September 2005 to 1st June 2006 and the
Date of Announcement is 20th Feb 2006. The period of 90 days before the event and
60 days after the event.
For Pharmaceutical Sector it’s from 15th September 2005 to 2nd June 2006
and the Date of Announcement is 19th Jan 2005. The period is 90 days before and 90
days after the Date of Announcement.
The period of study is from 23rd October 2000 to 12th June 2001 and the
Date of Announcement is 28th February 2001 the event period is 90 days before and
90 days after the event.
conducted for average abnormal returns to find whether the results are statistically significant
or not. The data for the event period is collected from the issues of Economic Times and
from National Stock Exchange Websites.:
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY
To ascertain the impact of industry specific announcements on the return of the stock
prices of that particular sector.
The impact may be different for different sectors. The share prices of different companies
may react differently to the announcement. Some may react so volatively that there may
be a chance to make abnormal returns. While in some cases it may not. The question
concerned is whether an investor can make short term profits by buying on
announcement date or make long term profits by buying on announcement date and
holding over a longer period of time
To determine the time period with in which the stock prices adjusts itself to the new
information.
The time taken for the share prices to adjust itself to the new information may be
different for different companies. The time taken to adjust may also depend on market
efficiency. If it takes a long time investors can make abnormal profits until it adjusts
itself.
EVENT TO BE STUDIED
Repo and Reverse Repo Rates hiked by 25 basis points by Reserve Bank on
February 06 th 2006
Finance minister Mr. P Chidambaram decide to levy excise duty on
Maximum Retail Price of drugs on January 19th 2005
Exemption of 100% of profits derived from export outside of India in
Connection with development of computer software on 28th February 2001
COMPANIES CONSIDERED
METHODOLOGY:
Event study methodology is used to calculate Average Abnormal Returns and Cumulative
Average Abnormal Returns around the date of announcement
R it = Ln(Pit/Pit-1)
Where, Pit and Pit-1 are respective closing daily prices for company i at time t and
t–1.
The expected returns on a stock have been estimated using the market model of Sharpe
(1964):
R it= á +â *R m t+ it
Where R it is the return on security i at time t, R m t is the return on the market index
at time t, á is the estimate of the intercept for share of company i, â is the estimate for beta of
share of company i, and it, is the independently and identically distributed residual error
term. In the next step we compute the ‘abnormal’ returns for each of the sample company for
the window period. Abnormal return is defined as the actual return minus the expected
return.
In order to eliminate the effect of any one or group of securities on the abnormal returns, the
AARs are averaged over the number of companies. The AARs of individual companies are
averaged for each day using the following model.
N
(AAR t)= i 1 AR it/N
With a view to know the cumulative effect of AARs on days surrounding the event,
cumulative Average Abnormal Return (CAAR) is calculated for event days t1 through t2 by
summing the average abnormal returns for these days: i.e.,
t2
(CAAR d)= t t1 AAR t
‘ t ’ TEST:
‘t’ test for difference of mean is also calculated to find out if there is any change in abnormal
returns before and after the event. To find whether there is significant difference in mean
before and after the event. The ‘t’ test is conducted at 5% level of significance
Formula used
=│‾X -‾Y│∕ Sd
SD ={(S1^2/N1)=(S2^2-N2)}^½
SD = Combined Standard Deviation
N= Number of Samples
X =Mean of Sample before Date of Announcement
Y= Mean of Sample after the Announcement Date
HYPOTESIS
Ho; There is no significant difference in the means before and after the date of announcement
H1; There is significant difference in the means before and after the date of announcement
Results;
Since‘t’ calculated is less than‘t’ tabulated valve, the Null Hypothesis is Accepted. We can
Conclude that the event does not have significant impact on the share prices.
Therefore the markets are efficient.
BANKEX
0.2
0.15
0.1
CAAR
0.05
0
-0.05 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
UTI
0.2
0.15
0.1
CAAR
0.05
0
-0.05 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
SBI
0.2
0.15
0.1
CAAR
0.05
0
-0.05 1 9 17 25 33 41 49 57 65 73 81 89 97 105 113 121 129 137 145
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
HDFC
0.2
0.15
0.1
CAAR
0.05
0
106
113
120
127
134
141
148
15
22
29
36
43
50
57
64
71
78
85
92
99
1
8
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
ICICI
0.2
0.15
0.1
CAAR
0.05
0
106
113
120
127
134
141
148
15
22
29
36
43
50
57
64
71
78
85
92
99
1
8
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
CANARA BANK
0.2
0.15
0.1
CAAR
0.05
0
1
9
17
25
33
41
49
57
65
73
81
89
97
105
113
121
129
137
145
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
EVENT STUDIED:
REPO RATES AND REVERSE REPO RATES HAVE BEEN HIKED BY 25 BASIS
POINTS ON FEBRUARY 6 t h 2006
ANALYSIS
There seems to be a general trend of decline in share prices of companies in this
sector between 127 t h and 145 t h day i.e. between March 10 t h and 30 t h March. HDFC
is the onl y company where the prices have not decline during this stage. Many
industry specific or economic factors may have been the reason for this. Bankex
seems to be more stable than any other companies in this sector.
Except for Canara Bank, which shows signs of abnormal profits, all the other
companies have adjusted itself to the new information quite quickl y and there was
no room for making abnormal profits to the investors. By looking at the graphs we
may conclude that the markets are efficient.
The share prices seem to have adjusted itself to the new information within a
period of 15 to 20 days.
To conclude a mere 25-basis-point rise in REPO rate is not going to make much of
a difference to banking companies. Banks in general operate on a fairl y large
margin or spread between the cost of raising funds and the return on them. They
have, thus, the capacit y to absorb the low rise in repo rates. It is reasonable to
expect that onl y those banks which have not raised the rates in the recent months
will now do so.
HYPOTESIS
Ho; There is no significant difference in the means before and after the date of announcement
H1; There is significant difference in the means before and after the date of announcement
Results;
Since‘t’ calculated is significantly less than‘t’ tabulated valve, the Null Hypothesis is
Accepted. .This shows that the difference is very minimal. We can conclude that the event
does not have significant impact on the share prices and market has not reacted so strongly.
Therefore the markets are efficient
-0.05 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99106113120127134141148155162169176
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
days
LIFEX
0.15
0.1
0.05
caar
0
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99106113120127134141148155162169176
-0.05
-0.1
days
SUNPHARMA
0.25
0.2
0.15
CAAR
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106113120127134141148155162169176
-0.1
days
GLAXO
0.15
0.1
0.05
CAAR
0 1
8
15
22
29
36
43
50
57
64
71
78
85
92
99
106
113
120
127
134
141
148
155
162
169
176
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
DAYS
DR REDDY
0.15
0.1
0.05
CAAR
0
-0.05 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99106113120127134141148155162169176
-0.1
-0.15
DAYS
CIPLA
0.15
0.1
0.05
CAAR
0
15
22
29
36
43
50
57
64
71
78
85
92
99
106
113
120
127
134
141
148
155
162
169
176
1
8
-0.05
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
DAYS
EVENT STUDIED
UNION FINANCE MINISTER DEC IDES TO LEVY EXC ISE DUTY ON MRP
OF DRUGS ON- JANVARY 19 T H 2005
Pharma stocks have been on the decline since the beginning of 2005. Major
scrips have lost 21 per cent to 11 per cent against a 7.3 per cent decline in
the Sensex since January 3 until event date.Pharma sector quarterl y results
have shown a mixed trend.Some companies have shown good results but
some have not.
Market anal ysts attribute the reasons for the fall in pharma share prices to a
mix of short-term impact caused by the change to MRP-based excise
assessment s ystem for drugs and long-term impact following the change-over
to the product patent regime.
ANALYSIS
By observing the graph one can say that the news was anticipated by this
sector. The drop in prices just before the date of announcement proves this
point. The CAAR valves have come down drasticall y in the ten days
preceding the Date of Announcement .The drop in prices may also be as a
result of information leakage details of which is not known
After the announcement is made we can see that the share prices have
graduall y adjusted itself and there was no room for abnormal profits. The
share prices seem to have adjusted within the span of 10 to 15 days.
There is no significant change in the CAAR valves after the event so we may
conclude that market is efficient.
Before After
Geometric -0.003807889 0.004895714
Wipro -0.001493111 0.001920286
Satyam -0.00131 0.00168
HCL -0.00359 0.004619
Infosys -0.00125 0.001601
T test results
HYPOTESIS
Ho; There is no significant difference in the means before and after the date of announcement
H1; There is significant difference in the means before and after the date of announcement
Results;
Since‘t’ calculated is less than‘t’ tabulated valve, the Null Hypothesis is Accepted. The
means values before the date of announcements in negatives while after the date it has been
positive. The impact is very less and that the company prices have adjusted itself very
quickly. We can conclude that the event does not have significant impact on the share
prices and there is no significant difference in means before and after the event and the
markets are efficient.
geometric
0.2
106
113
120
127
134
141
148
155
15
22
29
36
43
50
57
64
71
78
85
92
99
1
8
-0.2
CAAR
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
days
WIPRO
0.1
0
-0.1 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155
-0.2
CAAR
-0.3
-0.4
-0.5
-0.6
-0.7
DAYS
HCL
0.4
0.2
0
CAAR
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
DAYS
SATYAM
0.1
0
1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155
CAAR
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
DAYS
INFOSYS
0.1
0.05
0
-0.05 1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155
CAAR
-0.1
-0.15
-0.2
-0.25
-0.3
DAYS
EVENT STUDIED
ANALYSIS
After the date of announcement there seem to be a drastic fall in the share
prices. There is a down ward trend. The trend continues for some 15 to 20
days after which we can see the market picking up. There is no evidence of
investor making abnormal profits in an y of the company .There is not much
of an impact on HCL. One of the reasons may be it’s majorly into hardware
sector. On the other hand impact is more in Wipro. Stake holders may have
lost out on wealth in this particular company.
The share prices of Infos ys and Sat yam have taken a beating immediatel y
after the announcement but have adjusted in few days. The market seems to
have adjusted itself within a period of 20 to 25 days .the impact is also very
less in geometric company. One of the reasons is it’s a small company when
compared to other companies which are taken as market leaders.
Therefore it can be concluded that market is efficient.
SUMMARY
This study was conducted to find whether there were any abnormal returns after the
announcement of policy change by the government, and how long does the market take to
adjust to the new information. Event study methodology is used in this process. There has
been research in this field regarding reaction of stock market to bonus issue or stock split.
Very few studies have conducted event study on stock market reaction to changes in
government policy. This study aims to do that
The study was conducted for three different sectors namely Banking, Pharmaceuticals and
Information Technology. The event period was 90 days before and 60 days after the date of
announcement. The Events Studied were, changes in Repo and Reverse Repo rates in case of
Banking sector , excise on MRP in case of Pharmaceutical Companies and Software Products
brought under the tax net in case of Information Technology Sector. The data was collected
from various issues of Economic Times and websites of National Stock Exchange. Residual
returns were found using SPSS software. These valves were averaged and t test was done to
find whether the there is significant difference in means before and after the date of
announcement.
The results were negative, there was no significant difference. Then the residuals were
cumulated and were shown in a graph. From this we could make out that there were no
abnormal returns. Different companies have reacted differently to the news. For some
companies the share prices have fallen before the date of announcement like in
pharmaceutical sector and for some companies it has fallen right after the information was
release in the market. There is evidence to this in IT sector. The reasons for stock prices to
come down before the date of announcement could be information leakage or actual
anticipation.
Thus the conclusions drawn were the announcement of policy change by the government
have a mixed impact on different sector. But in general the markets have adjusted itself to the
new information quite quickly and there was no possibility of investors making abnormal
profits
The event that affects a firm's market value may be within the firm's control, such as the
event of the announcement of a stock split. Or the event may be outside the firm's control,
such as the event of a legislative act being passed, or a regulatory ruling being announced,
that will affect the firm's future operations in some way.
Single piece of information from the government may affect the share prices of specific
sector. Very little study has been made on this particular subject .This study aims at
examining the effect of an announcement made by the government in respect of Banking
sector, Pharmaceutical and Information Technology sector. In all the three sectors there was
mixed response.
The banking sector has not reacted volatily to the news announcement. Market analysts have
found that a mere 25 basis points will not affect the sector so much. There is general trend of
decline in the market some time after the date of announcements. Different companies have
reacted differently. But there was no chance of making abnormal returns in any company.
In case of pharmaceuticals the prices have fallen even before the date of announcements.
This may be due to information leakage or anticipation of announcement which is perceived
as bad for the sector. In case of IT companies the prices have fallen for larger companies
immediately after the date of announcements.
There has been mixed response even in these two sectors but on the whole there was no
abnormal returns in any of the sectors. The T test conducted also proves this point .The time
taken to adjust itself to the new information is different for each sector but on the whole we
may say it’s anywhere between 20 to 25 days .We may conclude that the Market are
Efficient.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Books:
“Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment analysis” by Elton and Gruber
“Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management” by Prasanna Chandra
Articles
Maurice,Litzenbergera and Mcenally; “Adjustment of Stock Prices Announcements
of Unanticipated Changes in Quarterly Earnings”; Journal of Accounting Research;
Autumn 1977.
Clarke; “The Effect of Fuel Adjustment Clause on Systematic Risk and Market
Valves of Electric Utilities”; Journal of Finance, Vol 35, PP 347-58.
Hagerman, Zmijewski and Shah;. “The Association between the Magnitude of
Quarterly Earnings Forecast Errors and Risk Adjusted Stock Returns”; Journal of
Accounting Research; autumn 1984.
Ramachandran;Behaviour of Stock Prices Information Assimilation and Market
Efficiency”; Thesis IIM Ahmedabad,1988
Subramanian; “The Impact of Political and Economic Event on Stock Prices
Behavior ;Thesis IIM Ahmedabad;1989
Software Used:
Microsoft Excel
SPSS Software
Websites:
www.nseindia.com
www.google.com
www.yahoo.com/finance
www.economictimes.indiatimes.com