Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As Michael Durall, in The Almost Church and Davidson Loehr in his essay,
Why “Unitarian Universalism” is Dying point out, the congregations of the
Unitarian Universalist Association have been struggling with an identity
crisis for decades. In my forty-year experience with this faith, I find our
denominational sense of self to be increasingly confused. The “Elevator
Speech” project is a clear symptom of a misplaced vitality. Leaving the
issue of identity between floors for a moment I would like to turn to the
ministry of the local congregation.
“The free and responsible search for truth and meaning,” (Principle 4)
should be seen as promoting a spiritual path. “Acceptance of one another
-1-
and encouragement to spiritual growth in our congregations,” (Principle 3)
explicitly refers to spiritual growth. While “ministry” should refer to
whatever is undertaken in the service of members or the community, the
principles above place spiritual growth at the center or our articulated
concern. A ministry supporting spiritual growth is necessary because as
Davidson Loehr reminds us in, Why “Unitarian Universalism” is Dying, that
the actual disciplines of the many faiths of the world require hard work,
“All the enduring religions of the world have been clear that the
treasures of honest religion must be earned, and make the highest
demands on us. That’s how those traditions raise our sights to see
and hear what Lincoln called, ‘the better angels of our nature.’”
Durall reports that this willingness to take on the hard work of a spiritual life
may be generational. He says:
When Owen-Towle, Durall and Loehr talk about the hard work and the
accountability of spirituality they are referring to “spiritual practice”. Loehr
goes on to say that our religious culture is in an imbalance because of a
much greater emphasis on individual rights over individual responsibilities
toward the community. I believe this imbalance appears in our communal
relationship with the individual level as we have an assumption that an
individual may believe almost anything, yet we have been hesitant to
similarly assume that individuals should be accountable, even to
themselves, for their actions, behaviors and choices. There seems to be a
lot of concern about behavior that is anti-social or destructive, but I am
discussing something else.
-2-
I believe that Unitarian Universalist congregations should commit their
ministries to encourage, empower and support not only our spiritual
searching, but most importantly our spiritual practices. Durall reports that
Anthony Robinson’s answer to the question, “Can churches deliver the
goods and create more compelling communities of faith?” was:
He also says,
-3-
Confession, Forgiveness and Contrition – Public admissions that we
have broken our vows, acceptance of our fallibility and the commitment to
heal the wounds we create.
“These were good ministers, but they did a bad thing. In the midst of
a religious vacuum, they exalted the social and political profile of the
seekers rather than the depth or ontological power of the religious
center that was being sought – which means that center was no
longer being sought, and the seeker were now learning to be
pleased with themselves.”
-4-
a spiritual discipline or practice. While our congregations should minister
to the entire range of spiritual engagement, we should be encouraging and
supporting members to progress along this continuum. Of course a
practitioner incorporates the proceeding stages continuing to seek and to
find.
-5-
Change never is. Yet, I actually expect more resistance from clergy. The
two primary objections I anticipate are that the minister does not have the
experience or training to set individual practice goals, provide
accountability or offer spiritual direction to members. Congregations can
help meet this objection by offering additional training. Furthermore, while
a settled minister may be responsible for a program of supporting a
spiritual practice, she may bring in others with more expertise or
experience as needed.
The other main objection will be that adding what amounts to spiritual
direction to the duties of the minister will demand more time and energy
than the position allows. While it is true that there is only so much time
and energy available in any position, the more important issue concerns
the priority of existing time and energy. Congregations should insist on the
priority of spiritual development and be willing to fund alternative provisions
for other needed services in congregational life. Spiritual development is
the importance we offer. In the terms of the Alice Mann model, ministers
should be offering individual assistance in spiritual practices in pastoral
sized congregations. In program sized congregations this support will be
increasingly delegated to professional consultants, affinity groups and
trained laity groups supervised by the minister. Labels for laity such as
“Deacon” may be appropriate for those members with experience, training
and discerning wisdom necessary to provide this kind of support.
-6-
Spiritual Practice, we offer a unique and precious gift to congregants. I
believe this is a gift members are generally requesting. The truth of the
matter is that a significant portion, maybe more than half, of Unitarian
Universalists are now attempting to work within a Spiritual Practice. Some
are tentative and some are headlong into commitment. In the most recent
issue of The World, the Rev. Dr. Galen Guengerich argues that Unitarian
Universalists should adopt the spiritual practice of Gratitude. While
Gratitude may not be everyone’s expression of spirituality, I applaud the
direction.
-7-
the spirituality of parishioners should be our top priority. What would
happen to membership, if we adopted the approach I have suggested? I
believe this shift would satisfy an unmet need and increase membership,
but I consider this effect to be irrelevant.
-8-
Membership growth serves our collective self-image by confirming that we
are likable and useful. But, to use the terms of commerce, supersizing a
product does not make it better, just bigger. Aggressive marketing can
offset deficiencies in product quality, but only in the short run.
In the long run, it may be that we are not quite as useful as we believe.
Those who leave may have liked something else better. Rather than
setting quotas for growth, I believe it may be time to re-imagine what we
can become. I believe that by focusing on spiritual practice, satisfaction
will grow around our programming and we will become more nourished by
what we find in our religious community. Our self-image will be formed in
the transformative power or our collective focus on living the life we are
called to live. We will reach for our own authenticity in this faith and find
that we are right with the world, whether or not others find us likable or
even useful.
Amen.
Mike Mallory,
2/25/07
1
I would suggest for purposes of this paper a definition of “spiritual” found in The Spiritual Aspect
of Nature: A Perspective from Depth Psychology, by Herbert W. Schroeder.
“…I want to offer a tentative definition of what I mean when I use the word “spiritual.” This word
carries many nuances of meaning and refers to a complex range of phenomena. Any definition
must therefore be viewed as provisional and incomplete. Most of the uses of the word that I have
encountered in regard to nature however, can be summed up in the following statement.
“’Spiritual’ refers to the experience of being related to or in touch with an “other” that transcends
one’s individual sense of self and gives meaning to one’s life at a deeper than intellectual level.
“In a spiritual experience, one encounters something larger or greater than one’s individual self.
The ‘other’ that one encounters need not be conceptualized in traditional religious terms.
Depending on the individual, the transcendent other may be seen as a supernatural deity (e.g.
God), or as a natural entity (e.g. the Earth). It may be something that exists objectively “out
there” (e.g. the process of evolution), or it may be a subjective, inner phenomenon (e.g. creative
inspiration). It may originate independently of the human sphere (e.g. wilderness), or it may be a
product of human culture (e.g. a community). For some people the ‘other’ may not be a specific
entity at all, but the undefinable “ground of being” that gives rise to all existing things.”
-9-