Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peace Media
Compiled by:
Eliud K Situma
John Harrington Ndeta
Acknowlegement
We sincerely thank our 20 media Monitors selected and trained to
Secondly our appreciation goes to Oxfam GB for fully funding this study.
Third to all PeaceNet Staff who offered technical advice on how best
Grace Ireri, Philip Onguje and Mutuku Nguli were particularly key in
Last but not least, I wish to thank Nadescor Strategic for providing us with
a lead Consultant, Mr. Eliud Situma who worked tirelessly in guiding the
Peace and Development Network Trust- Kenya (PeaceNet-Kenya) and The Seed
Institute commissioned the “Nurturing Nationhood through Peace Media” study
to assess the extent to which Vernacular/Community Radio stations cover peace
programmes.
As part of PeaceNet Kenya’s role in peace building and Conflict resolution, the
research sought to evaluate variables such as: the depth of coverage of conflict
issues, percentages of order restorers’, and the radio trends in addressing restorative
justice in Kenya as well as the cultural transformation fronted by the media.
Nurturing Nationhood through peace media was hinged on a school of thought that
constitutional and institutional reforms will not guarantee Kenya peace and stability-
a cultural reform is critical if Kenya with cultural diversity is to hold together. The
media is a critical agent of social control with a strong power to influence decisions,
shape emotions as well as dictate to some reasonable point on how people behave
and act. In terms of shaping the political culture, the most critical media in Kenya
today is the vernacular radio stations which largely play loaded vernacular music.
In the past, agents of doom have by design or default, abused the power of this media
and caused a lot of damage. Owing to a tendency of piecemeal media monitoring and
content analysis, this abuse has gone unnoticed with catastrophic consequences.
A scan of the current content coming out of some vernacular songs and some
programs in the FM radio stations points to a trend where some musicians and
guests in some FM stations propagate messages of victimhood that is likely to
destroy other than bridge cross-ethnic bridges.
For this reason; which is more pronounced in the vernacular FM stations, there
is widespread use of idioms that connote celebration of hatred and division in
society rather than nationhood. There is no existing tool specifically designed for
monitoring the use of language, its idioms and expressions in generally accepted ways
that promote and entrench stereotypes and hatred among the Kenyan public. And
because they do not necessarily fall within the umbrella of the kind of complaints
that both the Media Owners Association (MOA) and the Media Council of Kenya
(MCK) would receive so often, and considering that there is general acceptance of
such idioms amongst the target audience of these specific FM stations; they have
never been taken up even by those sections of the audience aware of the ultimate
consequences of allowing such content to pervade airwaves.
1.3 Hypotheses
1. FM Radio stations set the agenda in the public domain.
This was not the case in Kenya for a long time and communication had been limited
to two official languages that in essence locked out the majority of people especially
in the rural areas who could not comprehend English nor Kiswahili.
Most of these people could have been well served if they had mass media in their
local languages. The trend changed in 1996, when the government started licensing
independent broadcasters that challenged the state-owned Kenya Broadcasting
Corporation (KBC). Before this time KBC used to be the only broadcaster in
the country that also offered some broadcast programmes in the main country’s
vernacular languages like like the Kikuyu, Dholuo, Kalenjin, Luhya amongst others.
This clearly shows that most of the audiences had no such channels to articulate
their thoughts and participate fully in any public debate in the country as the State-
owned media did not cater for all the Kenyan Communities. At this time, feedback
from the audiences was minimal if any as KBC had other government oriented
programmes. This meant that the flow of information was somehow one sided as
the government tried to inform its citizens on its agendas.
Programming during this time was skewed to align with the government agenda in
total disregard to audience needs.This started changing in 1996 with the licencing
of private media in Kenya.
The first vernacular FM radion station; Kameme, which broadcast in Kikuyu language
was started in 2000 and broke the monopoly on local language broadcasting. This
was met with a lot of opposition nationally with many opining that it was likely to
cause disharmony by stirring ethnic conflict.
However, a law was passed in 2004 that liberalized the media industry and this
paved the way for many other vernacular FM radio stations that targeted listeners
from their ethnic communities. Some of these stations included: KASS FM and
Chamge for Kalenjin , Kameme, Inooro and Coro for the Kikuyu, Ramogi and Lake
Victoria FM for the Luo, Mulembe FM and West FM for Luhya, Mbaitu and Musyi
FM for Kamba and Muuga for the Meru speakers.
Nearly all the FM stations had highly popular talk shows and phone-in programmes,
often in the morning prime time slots. For example Ramogi- Baraza meaning
information assembly, Lake Victoria FM- just say it, KASS FM had Lee Nee Emeet
(what does the country say) the Kikuyu language Inooro FM, had Hagaria (sharpen)
and Kameme FM had main phone-in show Arahuka (wake-up).
The talk shows slowly became outlets for public debates and were used as an
expression of voices that had been suppressed for a long time. In these voices, one
could easily detect anger, dissatisfaction and demands for change.
When these stations started operating many Kenyans especially in the rural areas
had an opportunity to effectively interact with their fellow citizens through the
various channels now available. Through the famous phone-ins and talk show
programmes, many audiences were easily facilitated to air their views on any topical
issues under discussion without any professional scrutiny.
Most of the vernacular radio stations are privately owned and in essence this means
that any information that is aired in most instances is skewed towards the owners
interests.
Apart from this, the editorial staff is thin and is to a large extent not qualified to
undertake the responsibilities that are expected of them. This is largely due to
owners wanting to minimize on costs thus indirectly affecting the quality of what is
being disseminated to their various audiences.
The role of gate-keeping that is essentially done by the said editors is compromised
and the information that is churned out to the listeners is biased. The result of this
poor and unqualified editorial material disadvantages the consumers as they are
likely to be influenced negatively by believing in misinformation especially where
critical decisions affecting them are concerned.
Despite the fact that privatization of the mass media in the 1990s fundamentally
opened the door to many players, the outcome has not been entirely positive. There
is a general feeling that the so called Fourth Estate has colluded with economic and
political interests at the expense of the common citizenry; investors in the industry
are said to be treating the channels of democratic debate as their own personal
The economics of the new media demand that products be produced as cheaply
as possible. Commentary, chat, speculation, opinion, argument, controversy and
punditry, cost for less than the rigorous process of gathering and or verifying
information. “It is important for journalists to read and analyze issues if they hope
to perform well in their roles”, advises Dr. P.L.O Lumumba. “Society expects them
to report knowledgeably, fairly and truthfully. He who holds a pen holds a gun in
his hands and can choose to use it to build or to destroy. Journalists should read
the documents which form the basis of a review process, analyze and then pose
questions to the relevant authorities for clarification”, said the former Secretary of
the constitution of Kenya Review Commission (CKRC).
According to the Media Debates (2005), it is widely observed that anyone can now
pick up a phone and call a radio station to air their views and concerns about issues.
Indeed, as a result of this interactive culture, an audience that was once docile and
passive has now been transformed into a focused and engaged public. Many people
today are bold enough to talk about corruption, poor governance and many other
social concerns without fear. Consequently, the primary values of journalism stress
accuracy, truthfulness, fairness and balance. In addition, those who feel aggrieved by
media reports ought to be given a chance to be heard. However, these values seem
to have been disregarded by the new media stations. Presenters are not interested
in verifying facts. The principle of keeping fact separate from suspicion and analysis
is no longer honored.
Years of pent up frustration have found their voice on these radio stations which
- because they were set up principally as commercial entertainment vehicles - have
struggled to mediate the complex and angry debates that have ensued.
The popularity of talk shows and phone-ins has made them a mainstay of
programming, but the period immediately following the election resulted in radio
stations effectively losing control over their own programming. The result - largely
preventable - was appalling hate speech.
Hate music is a threat. It incites violence. Ignoring the problem means that hate can
grow in the middle of society without being confronted. The limit of tolerance is
reached not only when the text contains elements of a criminal offence but when it
violates the dignity of any human being. Any expressions of hate in public can never
be tolerated.
The study used multi-methods and techniques to capture data as described below.
The units of analysis were programmes focusing on peace and conflict related
subjects which mainly involved the discussions on Mau evictions, allocation of
administrative boundaries, and proliferation of illegal arms, President’s decision to
reverse the Prime Minister’s (PM) decision to dismiss the alleged corrupt ministers,
the proposed new constitution and the controversial appointment of Truth Justice
and Reconciliation Commision (TJRC) chairman.
The study analyzed subjects discussed between 29th Jan 2010-19th Feb 2010
The study captured the following as indicators for analysis:
• Name of the station
• Time of broadcast
• Time devoted to the subject
• Voices involved in peace building
• Perpetrator of violence
• Accuracy
• Balance of the subject
• Fairness of the broadcast
• Visible effects of violence covered
• Orientation of the subject
• Depth of the subject covered
• Dichotomization of the subject
• Anticipated options covered in the subject
3.3 Sampling
The population of interest was 10 FM stations .To ensure representativeness of
the final sampling framework, a preliminary survey was carried out to assess the
listenership trend. The stations sampled were chosen so that objectiveness could
be achieved.
Due to constraint of time and funds, secondary data from other like-minded research
firms was utilized to gauge the listenership trend. However, in some regions,
random responses to the question ‘Which radio station has highest listenership?’
were utilized to decide on the FM stations to be studied.
Some content categories were nominally coded and some were coded as ratio
measures with counts being made of the times that particular type of content was
aired. In order to address hypotheses listed above, ‘hate speech’ was conceptually defined
as. A controversial term for speech intended to degrade, intimidate, or incite violence or
prejudicial action against a group of people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin,
religion, sexual orientation, or disability.
Figure 4.2
The study was based on the ability of a station to exhaustively and accurately
report on two sides of any given story and be able to give any aggrieved party
the right to reply. This investigation also focused on ascertaining the possibility of
thorough research on any information prior to its broadcast. West FM was highly
rated in fairness at 85% followed closely by Baraka FM at 83%. The least rated
station on fairness was Pamoja FM at 60%. The overall rating of the vernacular
stations on fairness was 73.3%.
4. Decisions of Marketability
Journalists working for vernacular FM stations often struggle between
conflicting demands in the newsroom, the need to provide the public with
newsworthy subjects, and the need to produce subjects that are marketable.
A story might seem very important, but if it is one that might bore the target
audience or might be too controversial, it may not get covered. These kinds
of decisions are certainly subjective. Most working journalists are committed
Figure 4.4
The figure above indicates that the panelists invited in the sampled radio stations
played a crucial role in advocating for peace as opposed to the radio presenters
and callers .The panelist scored 30% compared to 10% scored by both presenters
and callers.
Figure 4.6
The mass media is expected to call for greater accountability on the part of leaders
and greater democracy which is a pillar to conflict resolution process.
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.8
Media objectivity calls for in-depth knowledge of the broadcasted events in relation
to their causes or historical backgrounds, long term effects and or even possible
damages that might arise in future. This would go a long way in assisting relevant
agencies to formulate mitigation measures to avert a possible future repeat of the
same or similar situation. An overwhelming 51% of the content entailed reports
on immediate and timely events .A minimal 12% of the content gave an in-depth
background of the conflict.
This study was designed in order to establish the overall theme and focus of the
vernacular radio stations. The frequency of various topics was monitored for
instance politics and governance, social and legal, war and violence, celebrity art
and music among other insignificant topics whose scope was also monitored. The
figure above indicates that politics and governance had 33% coverage while 18%
war and violence. The other content with notable percentages included music and
legal issues.
Figure 4.9.0
Consequently, the study sought to find the scope of coverage for the sampled
radio stations and how they have been able to replace the main stream English and
Kiswahili radio stations.
The trend in the scope of coverage indicates that rise of vernacular languages Fm stations
in Kenya is not a curse to the nation and Africa rather a trend in the right direction.
The Indigenous languages have been embraced and given the royalty and the nobility
they deserve especially in peace and conflict oriented activities.
Like South Africa today which has 11 national languages where Afrikaan and English
are at par with other nine indigenous languages like Sotho, Ndebele and Zulu;
Kenya has reached a time that national and official languages need to be extended
to include all the major and regional languages native to Kenya nation.
The media fraternity should however note that they have a duty to restore healthy
relationships as a prerequisite for peaceful interaction among the communities.
The gender concerns were further exacerbated by the way the female gender was
rated high as victims of violence and conflict.For instance the during the various
recent conflicts in Kenya, they faced threats and blackmail or physical and sexual
assaults, which led to serious physical injuries and in some cases, death. This trend
significantly frustrated the chances of women participating in peace initiatives and
democratic processes.
For instance the content obtained from the sampled FM stations show that during the
Mau evictions the children, adolescents, particularly girls, women were vulnerable
Figure 4.9.2
With the upcoming referendum on the proposed draft constitution, the vernacular
media will continue to play a central role in shaping opinions of the masses and
Kenya’s democracy as a whole.
Most local language stations in this study (and much of the rest of the media) appear
to have been playing an important role in calming tension and promoting dialogue.
A strengthening of such a role by a genuinely independent media will form a critical
contribution as Kenya navigates the turbulent waters ahead of it. Kenyans should
remember that the vernacular media stations are not designed to serve a specific
community but rather everyone who is able to understand the language being used
in the particular radio station.
5.2 Recommendations
1. The vernacular/community FM radio stations should discourage politicians
from using their stations to rally and organize their supporters on issues that
genuinely concern their communities. In other words they should endeavor
to use such forums to articulate issues that can improve their communities’
living standards other than portraying their constituents as the oppressed.
3. The study indicates that most panelists play a crucial role in advocating for
peace hence the vernacular stations should create more air time for the
panelists especially at this time when the referendum draws near. Some local
language radio stations have incited fear and hatred particularly at the height
of the controversial issues like Mau evictions, allocation of administrative
boundaries etc. Talk shows have provided the greatest opportunities for
hate speech and talk show hosts are not trained in conflict reporting or
moderation However, the invited panelists play a major role in nurturing
nationhood.
4. The politicians, mass media and local leaders and other relevant players need
to move from existing destructive processes and stereotypes evident in the
vernacular radio content towards constructive process aimed at national
cohesion.
5. The Vernacular stations need not only to discuss the visible effects of reported
conflict but also invisible effects. For instance, trauma and cultural shifts. Such
in-depth discussion will sensitize the community against violence.
7. The civil society and the general public to monitor the media especially
vernacular radio stations to ensure that they are professional and independent
from partisan agenda, or political and private interests. The media should
have the capacity to reflect the views of all social groups. In case of breach,
we should be able to report to Media council for action.
10. Vernacular FM radio stations should ensure that they only recruit trained
journalists who are able to moderate debates professionally. They should
also invest more in the re-training of their journalists to improve on their
skills.
12. The Media Council of Kenya that is mandated to oversee the operations in
the media industry should be strengthened effectively to punish any deviant
media stations; vernacular or otherwise.
13. The poor remuneration, status and safety of journalists is hampering a free
and plural media. Substantial progress in strengthening the media will not be
possible unless the working conditions of journalists are improved.
Note: Sometimes several subjects will be covered within the same story. Choose
the one that is given most prominence - e.g. in terms of the amount of time or
commentary devoted to it.
h. Insurgent/terrorist group
i. Other ‘villain’, criminal
j. Peace activist, antiwar groups
k. Other NGOs, humanitarian groups
l. Institutional spokesperson (including business)
m. Civilians (in general)
n. person ‘in the street’,
o. Victims, refugees (of crime, violence)
p. Witnesses
q. Independent experts, analysts, academics, think tanks
r. Media, journalists (other than those reporting this story)
s. Domestic public, viewers, audiences
t. Foreign/international publics
8. What is the gender of the first source Check one from this list:
a Female
b Male;
c Other source (e.g. institution) _____________________
In this section please give your answers briefly. Please print all your
responses.
2. a What evidence of efforts were made during the discussion that compromise,
peace-building and/or peaceful efforts to resolve or prevent the conflict?
b By whom?__________________________________________________
(e.g presenter / callers / panelists)
3. What context (e.g. causes, effects, and historical background) is given to the
conflict/ violence?
a. Aggressor/perpetrator?
c. Victim?
5. Is there any mention of voices and efforts for peace, nonviolent conflict
resolution, trust-building, reconstruction or reconciliation? Explain.
c What are the roles of youths in the reconciliation process pointed out in
the broadcast?
For each of the below question give details in a maximum of three sentences.
(Quote the actual expressions used in the respective programmes)
Note: (Focus signifies that most of the its theme is captured during the broadcast)
1. a) Does the subject cover the visible effects of violence such as casualties, death
toll, and material damage?
2 a) Does the subject cover the invisible effects of violence? Does it go beyond
the obvious visible effects of violence? Examples include trauma and glory,
(geo) political shifts, prestige or damage to the reputation of the communities
or conflicting parties involved, cultural shifts, loss of civil liberties, territorial
shifts.
b) Explain________________________________________________________
b) Explain____________________________________________________
b) Explain__________________________________________________
b) Explain___________________________________________________
7. a) Does the subject cover the here and now?: reports on immediate, timely
events, e.g. speeches or disputes, without examining the longer-term causes
and consequences of the conflict.
b) Explain____________________________________________________
8. a) Does the subject cover the long-term causes and/or consequences of the
conflict? an article reports on the background of the conflict or puts the
current event into a long-term context either historically, or by looking at
possible damages that may arise in the future because of the conflict
b) Explain_________________________________________________
10. a) Does the subject discuss about structural and/or cultural violence?:
(Structural violence is where a structure (usually understood as a system of
political, social or economic relations) creates barriers that people cannot
remove – it refers to unjust structures, oppressive forces, institutionalized
inequalities which deny human rights, keep people under poverty, and deny
access to resources, due to their race, gender, cultural and other . Although it
may take visible forms, it is usually thought of as an invisible form of violence,
built into ways of doing and ways of thinking.Cultural violence: means cultural
forms that justify or glorify violence. Because it also exists as ideas and images
carried in people’s minds, it is usually thought of as an invisible form of
violence. It includes things like hate speech, persecution, myths and legends
of war heroes, religious justifications for violence or war, the idea that one
group of people are the chosen people, and civilization arrogance.
b) Explain____________________________________________________
11. a) Does the subject dichotomize the good and bad?: describes things as “good”
versus “bad” In other words, does the subject see things merely in terms of
“either” “or”? This could be evident in language and labeling, but it may also be
achieved through the selection of events (atrocities, vs. humanitarian gestures;
aggression, vs. self-defense). Needs to be the overall tone of, and clearly stated
within, the broadcast. )
b) Explain____________________________________________________
12. a) Does the subject avoid good versus bad framing?: in this case, if the answer
to #11 is Yes, the answer here is No; and vice versa. Again, it should be the
overall tone of the broadcast.
b) Explain______________________________________________________
13.a) Is the story two-party oriented?: the broadcast will be included under this
category if there are only two sides to a conflict represented.
14. Is the subject multi-party oriented?: gives voice to many parties involved in
the conflict; portrays the conflict as involving multiple stakeholders, including
outside forces that may be influencing the direct combatants . Should report
on 3 or more different viewpoints.
b) Explain____________________________________________________
b) Explain____________________________________________________
b) Explain____________________________________________________
17. Does the subject discuss violent options? Does it anticipate future disputes,
outline strategies and imperatives, and/or frame the conflict as one that will be
decided by /violent /forceful means?
b) Explain____________________________________________________
18. Does the subject discuss peaceful options: highlights/discusses peace initiatives,
dialogue prevention of violence and restorative justice or reconciliation?
b) Explain____________________________________________________