Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Company
The meaning and nature of a company
The word ‘company’ has no strictly technical or legal meaning It may be described to
imply an association of persons for some common object or objects ,
It is normally reserved for those associatiated for economic purpose I e to carry on
business for gain .
It is applied to both parternership and joint stock Indian law regards company law district
form partnership and partnership law .
A company under act is defined to mean a company formed and registered under co act
1956 or under any of the previous law .
Company defined section 3[1] [ii] section 3[1] [ii] lays down that “an existing company
means a company formed and registered under any of previous company law .
Other defines co to understand clearly Lord justice Lindsey
“A company is an association of many who contribute money or monies worth to
common stock and employed in some trade or business and who share the profit and loss
arising there form.”
Prof Haney ‘ A company is an artificial person created by law , having separated
untimely with a perpetual succession and common seal’
The above definition clearly brings out the meaning of company in terms of its features .
A company to which the company act applies comes into existence only when it is
registered under the act . On registration a company becomes a body corporate i.e. it
acquired a legal personality of its own , separate and district form its members . A
registered co is there fore created by law and law alone can regulate modify or dissolve it.
.
1 perpetual succession .
2 Limited liability .
3 Transferability of shares .
4 Corporate personality.
5 Capacity to sue
6 Separate property
7 Flexibility and autonomy
From the above discussion it bit becomes very clear that an incorporated company
has an edge over other forms
.
A company is a legal person district from its members taken individually or
collectively .
A Company , being a Body corporate , can enter into contracts. A share holder
cannot enforce a contract made by the company. because he is neither a party to
the contract nor entitled to the benefited of it as a company is not a trustee for its
shareholders. Similarly shareholder cannot be held liable for contracts made by
the company or for any wrongful acts of the company.
The principal of legal entity of the first recognized by the House of lords in 1867
in case of oaks v/s Truant and Hording.
It was than held then that since an incorporated co has a legal personality district
from its members a creditor of the co has remedy only against the
Co and not against the co and not against an individual shareholder .
THE POSITION was further clarified in the famous case of Salomon v/s
Salomon and co. Ltd in this case all the members of the co belonged to one
family.
In conclusion it can be said that since the com has a separate corporate personality
Corporate personality , its members cannot be held liable for the debts , wrongs or
misdeeds of the company . because existence , its life is not affected by the death or
insolvency of any member
Kinds of companies
There are three types of companies:
1. Chartered companies: A chartered company is one of which is incorporated a
special charter granted by the king of England.
2. Statutory companies : These companies are incorporated by special Act of
Legislature (I,e. by the Act of Parliament or state legislature)
3. Registered companies : Companies registered under Indian companies Act,1956
or under any of previous companies Act or called registered companies. A
registered company comes into existence when it is registered under the
companies Act and certificate of incorporation issued by the registered
companies.
These companies may be
a) Companies limited by shares :
b) Companies limited by guarantee: or
c) Unlimited Companies.
Besides the above, the companies May also be classified as
a) Associations not for profit having licence under section 25 of the Act,
b) Government companies ;
c) Foreign companies ;
d) Holding and subsidiary companies.
Section 12 of the Act lays down that a private company may formed with a
minimum of two members sec 13(1)(a) provides that in the case of a private
limited company.
Public Company:
A public company is defined under sec 3(1)(iv) of the Companies Act, 1956
as amended by the companies (Amendment) Act 2000 to mean a company
which –
a) Private company
b) has minimum paid up capital of five lakh rupees or such higher paid up
capital, as may be prescribed;
c) is a private company, which is subsidiary of a company, which is not
private company.
Existing private and public companies.
Every private and Public company existing on the commencement of the
companies( Amendment ) Act 2000, (viz, 13-12-2000) with paid up
capital of less the amount prescribed must enhance its paid up capital to
the prescribed amount within a period of two years .
Section 25 Companies Exempted.
A Government company is a separate legal entity and should not be identified with
the state and its employees cannot claim to be Government servants (R.K.Chatterjes
V Union of India) In Heavy Engg. Mazdoor Union V state of Bihar, where the entire
Share capital is contributed by the central Government. The Supreme Court held that
the company is not the its shareholder.
2 Types of Companies
Q 1. Explain in brief the different types of companies?
Kinds of companies
On the basis of incorporation, there are three types companies:
1. Chartered companies:
2. Statutory Companies:
3. Registered Companies :
1. Chartered Companies: is one which is incorporated under a special charter granted
by the king or queen of England. The East India company and The Bank of England
are examples of companies incorporated England.
2. Statutory Companies: These companies are incorporated by a special Act of
Legislature. Reserve Bank of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India, Unit Trust
of India, Food Corporation of India are examples of such companies.
3. Registered companies: Companies registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956
or under any of previous companies Acts called registered companies.
ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.
The article of association is the rules and regulations or the bye laws which govern the
internal management of the company. They are like partnership deed in a partnership .it is
second imp document to be filled with register at the time of the co.
The true nature of Articles Can be understood by the observation of Lord Cairns in
Asbury rail carriage and iron co v/s Riche ‘The article proceed to define the powers of
governing body as between themselves and the mode and form in which the business of
co is at large , the mode and form in which business to carried on and the form in which
changes in which changes in the internal regulations of the may, form time in which
changes in the internal regulations of the co may, from time to time be made”
Thus Articles of association are subordinate to the Memoramadum of association of the
co.
Contents of articles of association.
A co should usually contain the following matters
1 the exclusion, whole or part of table A,
2 share capital
3 Rights of different classes of shareholders
4 allotments of shares
5 calls on shares
6 lien on shares
7 forfeiture of shares
8 transfer of shares
9. Surrender of shares
10. Share certificate
11. Issue of share warrants
12. Increase or Decrease of shares capital
13. Conversion of shares into stock,
14. Consolidation and sub-division of shares
15. Borowing powers
16. General meeting,
17. Appointment of managerial personnel;
18. Appointment and remuneration of auditors
19. Dividends and reserves
20. Accounts and audit;
21. Adoption or execution of preliminary contracts,
22. Capitalization of profit;
23. Notices;
24. Common seal;
25. Windings up.
A company has wide powers to alter it Articles to suit its requirements from time to time .
The procedure for alteration of articles is contained in section 31 of the companies Act.
Steps of Alteration:
The following alteration;
(1) A decision in the meeting of the Board must be taken to change all any of the
regulations of the existing articles and they should fix up the day, time, place and
agenda for the general meeting.
(2) It should be seen that the proposed alteration conformed to provision of the Act
and memorandum.
(3) A calling the general meeting should be sent to every member.
(4) If the shares of the company are enlisted with any recognized stock exchange,
(5) A special resolution should be passed by shareholder in the general meeting.
(6) After the articles have been altered.
(7) A copy of the special resolution along with explanatory statement in form no 23
must filed with register within thirty days after passing of the resolution.
(8) Necessary changes must be made in all copies articles.
(9) If the effect of alteration is to convert a public company into a private company,
Effect of Altered Articles
Alternation bind the members in the same way as original articles sec 36
The legal reprehensive of co can challenged the alternation on ground that a retrospective
effect.
Relation between memorandum and articles
Lord cairns in ash bury carriage co v/s riche observed that ‘the article play a part
subsidiary to the memorandum of association’ .
The article cannot give to the co power which are given by the memorandum of
association.
Binding effect of articles sec 36[1]
1 members to the company
2 company to the members
3 member inter se
4 company to outsiders [ a person who is not a member of co ]
Doctrine of indoor management
Memorandum and article of association when registered with the register of co assume
the register of public document
Prospectus
A prospectus as per sec 2 [36] read along with sec 58A means any document described or
issued as prospectus and includes any notice ,circular advertisement circular or other
document from public or inviting offers from public for the subscription or purchase of
any shares in or debentures of body corporate.
Two things if it satisfied
1 invites deposits
2the adored invitation is made to the public.
Continents of prospects
1 General information
Nicols- Defendant-Bailee
Ultzen want to the Nicols’ restaurant for the purpose of dinning there . when he ultzen
entered the restaurant , A waiter took the plaintiff coat from him with out being requested
to do so and having it on a nook behind the plaintiff .
When plaintiff wanted to leave He found that the coat had been lost .It was held that
defendant was the bailee of the coat as his servant had assumed the possession of some
and he was therefore liable fore its loss which was due to his negligence .
If the owner maintained control over the goods, there is no bailment .when a person
keeps his goods in premises of another person but himself continues to have the control
over him, this is not sufficient delivery for being to b e
bailment .
In Kaliaporumal Pillai ,
V/s Visalakeshmi
A lady took her old Jewel to a goldsmith for being meted and burning convert into new
jewels .
Every evening she used to receive the half made jewels . put the same into a box & to
lock the same .
She allowed locked box to remain the premises of the goldsmith but kept the key
(boxkey) in her Possession . One night the jewels were Stolen . it was herd that there was
no bailment as she did not handed over the possession of jewels to the goldsmith ,&
therefore the goldsmith could not liable for the loss .
Similar in case of national Bank of Lahore V/s Sohan lal .
Similar would be the position if a locker in a safe deposit values given by a bank to the
customer and customer is also given one key of the such locker, with out which the
locker cannot be opened.
In such case locker may be in the Premises of Bank . The person who kept the valuable in
the locker has control over such goods and there is no bailment of such goods to the
bank . The position would However be different if the locker in the safe deposit value of
bank can operated even with out the key of the Customer.
It was held that In such case like the locker had be operated even without the key with the
customer , customers control over the valuable in that locker had gone, and the same was
with the bank & therefore the bank was bailee and was liable for loss of the belongings of
the customers in the lockers
In addition to that the bank was course also liable on account of vicarious liability for the
fraud committed by the bank manager.
.
There cannot be bailment with out a contract
In Ram Guam v/s Govt of U P The Aallabhad H C expressed the view that obligation of
a bailee can arises only out of contract of bailment and not otherwise .
In this Ram-plaintiff
Govt- -dffident
Pf ‘s property had been stolen . The same was recovered by police and kept Malkhana
from there , it was again stolen and could not be traced . The pf brought action to recover
the value of the property .
The state got was held not liable firstly, because it was not liable, as such and secondly
The police , took and kept the property in possession , acting in charge of obligation
imposed by law , rather than in obedience to some executive orders .
The point of decision in the above case that bailment cannot arise without a contract does
not appear to be convincing the law it self recognizes the finder of goods as a bailee .
In some cases, it has been held that bailment can be there even without a contract .
2 Return of the goods after the purpose is achieved .
The delivery of the goods ,in a bailment is only for some purpose eg for safe custody , for
carriage , or repair etc when purpose accomplished return other wise according to the
directions of the person delivery them .
It is that in every bailment the something is to be returned or either in some form or is an
altered form Eg:- when cloth is given for stitched into a suit or gold for being converted
into ornament , wheat for being converted into a flour .
There is a bailment in each case
When money is deposited in a bank it is not bailment because the banker is not to return
the same money to the depositor similarly when an agent receives some payment on
behalf of principal he is not bailer.
In one case Kalayani Breweries ltd v/s state of west Bengal
In this case pf brewed and sold beer in beer bottles . customer were required to pay the
exact cost of bottles apart from the price of the contents . The empty Bottles paid by him.
was to be refunded to him. It was held that there was only sale of bottles rather than
bailment .The deposit amount of bottle was there for liable to sales tax .
Section 150 mentions the duty of a bailor in respect of the goods bailed by him .
1 The bailor is bound to disclose to the bailee faults in the goods bailed , of
which the bailor is aware , & which material interfere with use of them or
expose the bailee to extraordinary risks and if he does not make such
disclosure . he is responsible for damage arising to the bailer directly from
such faults .
2 If the goods are bailed for hire , bailor is responsible for such damage ,
whether he was not aware of existence of such in the goods bailed .
GRATUITOUS BAILMENT :-
Gratuitous bailor or without reward , because when the bailor bails the goods the
for reward he is liable for damage caused by the defective goods even though he
not aware of the effect in them
Ex
- “A” lends a horse which he know to be vicious to B . The dose not disclose the fact that
the horse is vicious. The horse runs away B is thrown and injured . A is responsible to
“B” for damage Sustained ,.
In all cases of bailment the bailer is bound to take as much care of the goods.
bailed to him as a man of ordinary prudence would under similar circumstance ,
take of his own goods of the same bulk, quality and value as the gods bailed”
Ace Sec 151 the bailer should take such care of goods as man of ordinary
prudence would take of his own goods . if the bailer has not acted like an ordinary
prudent man , he cannot be excused by pleading that he had taken similar care of
own goods also, & his goods have lost or damaged along with those bailor or that
he bailor .
Had its knowledge that his goods were being kept in a negligent manner .
Its is observed that . In cases that “ The obligation of the bank to take care of the
pledged goods must be seas in the in the conduct of the extordinary situation that
developed”
If the bailer has taken due care & the damage to the goods is because of the
circumstance beyond his control , he will not be liable for the loss “
There if food grains stored in the bailer’s go down are damaged by un India V /s
united precedence floods in the town, the bailer cannot be made liable for the loss.
Union of India Fire, etc Insurance co Ltd . cotton bales belongs to consignee .
Company it self and kept out side the railway goods sets covered with terpailin .
The consequence company did not have sufficient ware choosing facilities, and
its ordinary goods including the cotton boles were laying in and out side the goods
shed .
The Company had provided watchman and railway protection staff was also the
to take care of these goods .
The company did not taken delivery of its goods in take care of these goods . The
do so .and 13 day’s after the unloading of the said boles the cotton boles caught
fire for unknown reasons . The railways held that the railway authorities could not
be held liable for negligence under these circumnistance.
In Sunder Lal v/s Ram sarup
A wooden shop was hired under a written agreement that shop will be edreturen
in the some conditions and the hirer will be liable for any loss or damage to it. It
the shop was burnt by the mob during the riots in the city .It was held that since
the destruction of the shop was due to no negligence on the hirer he was not liable
for the loss.
3 Duty not make unauthorized use of the goods bailed[ s-153-and 154]
When the goods have bailed for a particular purpose the baile is supposed to use
them only for that purpose and none else . If he makes unauthorized use of goods
there are two remedies available to the bailor
s-153 The bailor may terminated the bailment .s-154 The bailor may recover
compunction for the loss caused due to unauthorized use of goods .
Termination of bailment by bailee ‘s act inconsistent with conditions:-
Illustration :-A lets to B for hier a horse for his own riding. B drives the horse in
his carriage . This is at the opinion of A , a termination of the bailment .
2 . Damages for loss due to unauthorized use
If the bailere makes such use of the goods which is contrary to the conditions of
bailment, He liable to make compensation to the bailor for any damage to the
goods due to unauthorized use such a liability arises even if the unauthorized use
being made with care .
Sec 154. Liability of bailer making unauthorized use of making use of goods
bailed .
When the mixture goods cannot be separated
In case it cannot be separated from those of the bailee it is deemed to be loss of
goods and the bailor can recover composition for same from the baillee s -157
Then bailor is entitled to be compensated by the bailee for the loss of the goods .
Illustration
Bails a barrel of flour worthRS-45 to B. with out A s consent mixes the flour with
country of his own worth Rs25 only a barrel B must compensate A for the loss of
his flour.
Ex oil also can be given
Acc s-163 Increase or profits which have accrued from the goods bailed. bound to
the bailor .
Illustration
A leaves a cow in the custody of B. To be taken care of the cow. cow has a calf B
is bound to deliver the calf as well as the cow to A .
The bailey of the goods has some rights
1Right to recover necessary expenses incurred on bailment s-158
2Right to recover compensation from the bailor s-164
3Right to have a lien on goods bailed s-170-171
4 Right of suit against .a wrong doer.
When the bailey loses his possession of goods, his right of lien is lost by
Sec170 Particular Lien .A delivery rough (duplicate) diamond to B, jewels to
be cut and polished which is accordingly done it is entitle to retain the stone
till he is paid for services he was rendered .
The right particular lien has been recognized not only in fever of bailey but in
some other cases also like
1). Lien of finder goods sec {168}.
2} Pledge’s Lien sec [173 174]
3] Agent’s Lien Sec
4] Unpaid seller’s Lien sec 47 sale goods act 1930.
5} Partner’s Lien sec 52 Indian partnership act 1932
The right of general lien has been conferred on the following kinds of
bailey.
1 Baker 2 Attorney general of high court 3 Factors 4 Policy brokers 5
war fingers.
The right is awe able to the above categories of baileys. Only and none
else “Unless there is an express contract to that effect.
General lien of war fingers.
Whereof means a loading stage side a receiver for loading and unloading
vessels.
Where of means a person who owns or has the care of a whereof.
A war fingers has a lien over it goods of his customers. Until his war fingers is
the changes for the use of whereof are paid to him.
Its claim of general lien is only in respect of those goods which he received in
his couatg as war fingers.
General lien on attorney. Sec 171 H.C. attorney’s also got a right of general
lien. This right is presumed to be available to Advocates and other legel
Practionars.
The right can be excused in respect of the documents are belonging to the
client which are with him.
He can retain them until his fees for the professional services and other cost
and expenses incurred by him for a client are paid to him.
In purushottam das, and bananas das V/s Union of India. A obtained delivery
of certain goods from the railway on a forged railway receipt. A Pledge the
goods to B it was held that the railway authorities had a right to recover those
goods from B .