Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10064-009-0254-6
ORIGINAL PAPER
Received: 18 November 2008 / Accepted: 12 November 2009 / Published online: 8 January 2010
Ó Springer-Verlag 2009
Abstract Ground motions under earthquake loading are scientists trying to find the most appropriate ways of
influenced by the local soil conditions, but the non-linearity reducing the magnitude of earthquake-related hazards.
of the soil behavior makes it difficult to estimate the site Interpreting strong ground motions is one of the most
response. The paper reports a non-linear analysis developed important problems in geotechnical earthquake analysis,
to elucidate the effect of non-linearity on site response, which is undertaken to determine the site response and
illustrating its applicability with reference to a petroleum estimate the free-field ground shaking during an earth-
storage tank site subjected to earthquake excitation. quake. Although seismic waves generally travel tens of
kilometers in rock but \100 m in soil, the soil plays a very
Keywords Earthquake Nonlinear Site response important role in determining the characteristics of ground
Ground motion motion (Kramar 1996).
A number of different techniques have been developed
Résumé Les mouvements du sol résultant de sollicita- for site response analysis since the 1920s. To approximate
tions sismiques sont influencés par les conditions locales, the actual non-linear, inelastic response of soils, an
mais la non-linéarité du comportement des sols rend dif- equivalent linear approach was proposed by Schnabel et al.
ficile l’estimation de la réponse du site. L’article présente (1972). In this approach, linear analyses are performed
une analyse non-linéaire développée afin d’élucider les with soil properties that are iteratively adjusted to be
effets de la non-linéarité sur la réponse d’un site, illustrant consistent with an effective level of shear strain induced in
son applicabilité par référence à un site de stockage de the soil. Yoshida (1994), Huang et al. (2001) and Yoshida
réservoirs de pétrole soumis à des sollicitations sismiques. and Iai (1998) showed that equivalent linear analysis
exaggerates the peak acceleration because the method
Mots clés Séisme Non-linéarité Réponse de site calculates acceleration in the high frequency range.
Mouvement du sol
123
288 H. Arslan, B. Siyahi
strains causing a reduced (non-linear) amplification. Seis- Borja et al. (1999) developed a fully non-linear finite-
mologists, on the other hand, have tended to remain element (FE) model to investigate the impact of hysteretic
skeptical of this non-linear effect (Field et al. 1997), mainly and viscous material behavior on the downhole motion
because the relatively few strong-motion observations recorded by an array at a large-scale seismic test site in
seemed to be consistent with linear elasticity. Lotung, Taiwan, during the earthquake of 20 May 1986.
Since the 1970s, quantitative studies have been under- The constitutive model was based on a three-dimensional
taken using strong-motion array data. Several methods bounding surface plasticity theory with a vanishing elastic
have been proposed for evaluating site effects using region and accounts for shear stiffness degradation at the
ground-motion data, such as soil-to-rock spectral ratios onset of loading. The accuracy of the method proposed by
(e.g., Borcherdt 1970), a generalized inversion (e.g., Iwata Borja et al. (1999) is good, although the peak values were
and Irikura 1988; Boatwright et al. 1991), and horizontal- slightly under-estimated.
to-vertical spectral ratios (e.g., Joyner and Chen 1975; Lam Rodriguez-Marek et al. (2001) proposed an empirical
et al. 1978; Lermo and Chavez-Garcia 1993; Field and geotechnical seismic site response procedure that accounts
Jacob 1995; Yamazaki and Ansary 1997; Nakamura 1988; for the non-linear stress–strain response of earth materials
Bardet et al. 2000; Bardet and Tobita 2001; Arslan and under earthquake loading. In this study, the primary effects
Siyahi 2006; Siyahi and Arslan 2008). of material non-linearities are the increase of site period-
Analytical methods for site response analysis include icity and material damping as the intensity of ground
many parameters that could affect earthquake ground motion increases. The larger damping ratio is observed in
motions and corresponding response spectra. It is important lower spectral amplifications for all periods. However, the
to investigate the effect of these parameters on site effect of damping is pronounced for high frequency
response analysis in order to make confident evaluations of motion. Thus, soil damping significantly affected the peak
earthquake ground motions at the site. Seed and Idriss acceleration.
(1970), Joyner and Chen (1975) and Hwang and Lee In summary, there has been much research on site
(1991) investigated the effects of site parameters such as response analysis of the ground under earthquake loading.
secant shear modulus, low-strain damping ratio, types of The equivalent linear approach (Schnabel et al. 1972) is
sand and clay, location of water table and depth of bedrock. widely used for site response analysis. The paper compares
The parametric studies have shown that the secant shear the equivalent linear approach and the non-linear approach
modulus, depth of bedrock and types of sand and clay have proposed by Kramar (1996) to illustrate similarities and
a significant effect on the results of site response analysis. differences of the two methods.
However, the low-strain damping ratio and variations in
water table have only a minor influence.
For application in site response analysis, two basic Non-linear site response analysis
approaches have commonly been employed to represent
soil behavior during cyclic loading. The first, in which the The linear site response approach has been used because it
soil is modeled by a series of springs and frictional ele- is computationally convenient and provides reasonable
ments (Iwan model), uses Masing’s rules to establish the results for some practical cases (Kramar 1996). However,
shape of the cyclic, hysteresis curves (Seed et al. 1972). the non-linear and inelastic behavior of soil is well estab-
This model does not normally simulate the degradation lished in geotechnical engineering. For dynamic analysis,
observed due to cyclic loading of soils, nor does it provide the non-linearity means that the shear modulus of the soil is
a good simulation of the observed strain dependence of the constantly changing while the inelasticity means that the
shear modulus and damping ratio. Furthermore, application soil unloads along a different path than its loading path,
of Masing’s rules does not provide an adequate approxi- thereby dissipating energy at the points of contact between
mation for shear modulus and damping ratio simulta- particles. Both time domain and frequency-domain analy-
neously. In the second approach, damping is modeled as a ses are used to account for the non-linear effects in site-
viscous, rather than frictional, effect. This approach uses a response problems. Non-linear and equivalent-linear
pseudo-linear treatment and applies an iterative procedure methods are used in the time and frequency domain
in order to account for the strain dependence of modulus respectively for the one-dimensional analysis of shear
and damping (Schnabel et al. 1972). The main shortcoming wave propagation in layered soil media. When compared
of the linear method is its inability to take account of the with earthquake observation, non-linear analysis has been
strong strain dependence observed experimentally for shear shown to agree with the observed record better than the
modulus and damping ratio. The best that can be done with equivalent-linear analysis.
the linear model is to apply the method of iteration and to Kramar (1996) developed a non-linear approach
set values of shear. whereby a non-linear inelastic stress–strain relationship is
123
Effect of nonlinearity on site response and ground motion 289
123
290 H. Arslan, B. Siyahi
Fig. 3 Acceleration time history relation for the bottom soil layer Fig. 5 Acceleration response spectra for the top layer
123
Effect of nonlinearity on site response and ground motion 291
was used for the site response analysis which considered the silty sand layer with a unit weight of 17 kPa and shear
coupled mechanical deformation of the pile structure where wave velocity of 225 m/s. Below is a high plasticity clay
each element behaves according to a prescribed linear or (CH) layer with unit weight of 20.0 KN/m3 and shear wave
non-linear stress/strain law in response to the applied forces velocity of 500 m/s.
or boundary restraints. The material may yield and flow The piles were modeled using beam elements. The
accordingly. The explicit Lagrangian calculation scheme viscous boundary conditions are specified along the side
and the mixed-discretization zoning technique used in FLAC boundaries of the model to take account of the wave
ensure that plastic collapse and flow are modeled accurately. radiation and minimize the wave reflections. Input earth-
quake motion is applied at the bottom boundaries to sim-
ulate the ground motion in Figs. 7 and 8. The simulation
Two-dimensional model presented in Fig. 7 is based on the mean theoretical Fourier
amplitude spectrum; the effects of standard deviation on
Based on the borehole data, two soil profiles were selected the analysis are shown in Fig. 8. The peak ground accel-
to reflect both the topographic and local soil effects. Both erations (0.53 g and 0.78 for mean and mean ?1r FAS) are
consist of a fill layer with a unit weight of 17.0 kPa and compatible with both the probabilistic and attenuation
shear wave velocity approximately 150 m/s overlying a based values.
123
292 H. Arslan, B. Siyahi
Conclusions
References
123
Effect of nonlinearity on site response and ground motion 293
Huang HC, Shieh CS, Chiu HC (2001) Linear and nonlinear Schnabel PB, Lysmer J, Seed HB (1972) SHAKE A computer
behaviors of soft soil layers using Lotung downhole array in program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered
Taiwan. Terr Atoms Ocean Sci 12:503 sites. Report no. EERC72-12, University of California, Berkeley
Hwang HHM, Lee CS (1991) Parametric study of site response Seed HB, Idriss IM (1970) Soil moduli and damping factors for
analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 10(6):282–290 dynamic response analysis. Report no. EERC70-10, University
Iwata T, Irikura K (1988) Source parameters of the 1983 Japan Sea of California, Berkeley
earthquake sequence. J Phys Earth 36:155–184 Seed HB, Whitman RV, Dezfulian H, Dobry R, Idriss IM (1972) Soil
Joyner WB, Chen ATF (1975) Calculation of nonlinear ground conditions and building damage in the 1967 Caracas earthquake.
response in earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 65:1315–1336 J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98:787–806
Kramar SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice- Siyahi B, Arslan H (2008) Earthquake induced deformations of earth
Hall, New Jersey dams. Bull Eng Geol Environ 67(3):397–403
Lam I, Tsai CF, Martin GR (1978) Determination of site dependent Yamazaki F, Ansary MA (1997) Horizontal-to-vertical spectrum ratio
spectra using nonlinear analysis. Second international confer- of earthquake ground motion for site characterization. Earth-
ence on microzonation, San Francisco, CA quake Eng Struct Dyn 26:671–689 JSSMFE:14–31
Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1993) Site effects evaluation using Yoshida N (1994) Applicability of conventional computer code
spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seism Soc Am SHAKE to nonlinear problem. In: Proceedings of symposium on
83:1574–1594 amplification of ground shaking in soft ground
Nakamura Y (1988) On the urgent earthquake detection and alarm Yoshida N, Iai S (1998) Nonlinear site response analysis and its
system (UrEDAS). In: Proceeding of 9th world conference on evaluation and prediction. 2nd International symposium on the
earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan effect of surface geology on seismic motion, Yokosuka, Japan,
Rodriguez-Marek A, Bray JD, Abrahamson N (2001) An empirical pp 71–90
geotechnical seismic site response procedure. Earthq Spectra
17(1):68–88
123