|




 

 
2
  
  
 
 j

Section 1 Present Status of Indian Accounting Standard
Section 2 What is IFRS?

Section 3 Convergence to IFRS: Meaning and Proposed Timelines

Section 4 Entities impacted with Convergence

Section 5 Format of IFRS for India

Section 6 Role of ASB in Post Convergence Scenario

Section 7 Benefits and Challenges of Convergence

Section 8 Critical success factors for IFRS conversion projects

Section 9 Categorization of IFRS by ICAI

Section 10 Project Management for IFRS Convergence Project

Section 11 Conclusion
 V



 
 
j 






4 Presently, the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) of the Institute of Chartered

accountants of India (ICAI) formulates Accounting Standards (ASs) based on the
IFRSs keeping in view the local conditions including legal and economic
environment, which have recently been notified by the Central Government under
the Companies Act, 1956.

4 Accordingly, the Ass depart from the corresponding IFRSs to maintain consistency
with legal, regulatory and economic environment, and keeping in view the level of
preparedness of the industry and the accounting professionals.

4 In some cases, departures are made on account of conceptual differences with the
treatments prescribed in the IFRSs.
 6
  

4 IFRS is a set of international accounting standards stating how particular types of

transactions and other events should be reported in financial statements.

4 IFRS are generally principles-based standards and seek to avoid a rule-book mentality.
Application of IFRS requires exercise of judgment by the preparer and the auditor in
applying principles of accounting on the basis of the economic substance of
transactions.

4 IFRS are issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

4 The term IFRS comprises IFRS issued by IASB; IAS issued by IASC; and Interpretations
issued by the Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC) and the International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) of the IASB.
 International
Financial
reporting
Standard (IFRS)

International
Financial International
Reporting   Accounting
Interpretations Standard (IAS)
Committee (IFRIC)

Standing
Interpretations
Committee (SIC)
 |

  

4 The IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) are
increasingly being recognized as Global Reporting Standards.

4 More than 100 countries such as countries of European Union, Australia, New
Zealand and Russia currently require or permit the use of IFRSs in their countries.

4 In line with the global trend, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI)
has proposed a plan for convergence with IFRS with effect from April 1, 2011.

4 Convergence to IFRS would mean India would join a league of more than 100
countries, which have converged with IFRS.
 6|


 

4 A single set of accounting standards would enable internationally to standardize

training and assure better quality on a global screen.

4 It would also permit international capital to flow more freely, enabling companies
to develop consistent global practices on accounting problems.

4 It would be beneficial to regulators too, as a complexity associated with needing

to understand various reporting regimes would be reduced.
 §

 |


 

4 Convergence means to achieve harmony with IFRSs; in precise terms convergence

can be considered ͞to design and maintain national accounting standards in a way
that financial statements prepared in accordance with national accounting
standards draw unreserved statement of compliance with IFRSs͟, i.e., when the
national accounting standards will comply with all the requirements of IFRS.

4 But convergence doesn͛t mean that IFRS should be adopted word by word, e.g.,
replacing the term ͚true & fair͛ for ͚present fairly͛, in IAS 1, s
 

 . Such changes do not lead to non-convergence with IFRS.

4 The IASB accepts in its ͚Statement of Best Practice: Working Relationships

between the IASB and other Accounting Standards-Setters͛ that ͞adding disclosure
requirements or removing optional treatments do not create noncompliance with
IFRSs. But additional disclosures or removing of optional treatment should be
made clear so that users of the IFRS are aware of the changes.
   



 V   

· Reporting under IFRS, as proposed by ICAI, would be applicable for accounting periods beginning
on or after April 1,2011.

· The first set of IFRS financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2012 would require
preparation of:
Opening balance sheet as on April 1, 2010
Comparative financial statements ʹ year ending March 31, 2011

· Reporting enterprises would need to ensure preparedness for IFRS reporting as early as April 2010.
 6 


  
|




4 eeping in view the complex nature of IFRSs and the extent of differences between the
existing ASs and the corresponding IFRSs and the reasons therefore, the ICAI is of the
view that IFRSs should be adopted for the public interest entities from the accounting
periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2011.

V 




 
 

 

  !



 


 | 
 



 6 


V 







V 









"   


" #
 

'   

"  
+

 " 



 
   



  "   
 
 

"% +$


 "


   








$     






 




% $,-- 


 $
% ()  





%  

  




   




 "
"

*






&  
 


&

 
 &   


 


& 
   
§  !


+§"

4 SMEs need not adopt all the IFRS as it will be too voluminous for them.

4 A separate standard for SMEs will be formulated based on the IFRS for SMEs
which is still in exposure draft stage.

4 The proposed standard represents a simplified set of standards for SME's with
disclosure requirements reduced, methods for recognition and measurement
simplified and topics not relevant to SME's eliminated.

4 IFRS for SMEs will be adopted in toto or with modifications, if necessary.

4 Compliance with this IFRS for SMEs is not necessary to make India IFRS-
compliant.
 
   
 

4 The format of IFRSs to be adopted for public interest entities should be the same
as that of IFRSs, including their numbers.

4 The numbers of the existing Accounting Standards may be given in brackets for
the purpose of easier identification.

4 Wherever required, a section may be added at the end of the adopted IFRS
indicating the Indian legal and regulatory position.

4 The IFRSs when adopted will also take into account the International Financial
Reporting Interpretations issued by the IFRIC of the IASB.

4 Only in rare circumstances of public interest a carve out from an IFRS may be
made.
  j
V 
|





 
 


   .# 

1




 
j 





 
  
 
 
  


 
 



 
 


  

'








  
# 

%  


V



 
j 





   
  /

j  
| 


j 





+/j|j" 

  0 


 


 

 |




 

 
|  
 j
0  

 
|
§ 
 


4Convergence with IFRS
eliminates multiple reporting
such as Indian GAAP, IFRS, US
GAAP
4IFRS will give more comparability
among sectors, countries and
companies.
4This will result in more transparent
financial reporting of a company͛s
activities which will benefit
investors, customers and other key
stakeholders in India and overseas
4Convergence with IFRS will
enable Indian entities to have
easier access to global capital
markets and eliminates barriers
to cross-border listings.
4 It encourages international
investing and thereby leads to
more foreign capital flows to the
country.
4Financial statements
prepared using a common set
of accounting standards help
investors better understand
investment opportunities as
opposed to financial
statements prepared using a
different set of national
accounting standards




  

 





  



 

 


 



4
istorical cost will be substituted
by fair values for several balance
sheet items, which will enable a
corporate to know its true worth


 



  
4Convergence to IFRS will
increase the opportunities for
Indian professionals in abroad
as they will be able to sell
their services as experts in
different parts of the world
4Better quality of financial
4Currently companies need to
reporting due to consistent
prepare additional financial
application of accounting
statements based on multiple
principles and improvement in
reporting formats to arise
reliability of financial statements.
capital in global market.
4This, in turn, will lead to
4Convergence with IFRS will
increased trust and reliance
eliminate the requirement for
placed by investors, analysts and
dual set of financials
other stakeholders in a
statements and thereby
company͛s financial statements
reduces the cost of raising
funds by the companies
 |
 |



|


 



 


  V
  
 

 

  
4For the success of convergence in
India, certain regulatory amendment is
required.
4For example, The Companies Act
(Schedule VI) prescribes the format for
presentation of financial statements for
Indian companies, whereas the
presentation requirements are
significantly different under IFRS. So, the
companies act needs to be amended in
line with IFRS.
4Adoption of IFRS by
approximately 5000 listed
companies by 2011 would result
in a significant demand for IFRS
resources. Corporate India and
accounting professionals need to
be trained for effective migration
to IFRS. Additionally auditors
would need to train their staff to
audit under IFRS environment

4Educating Stakeholders
4Significant one-time costs
comprising of investors,
of converting to IFRS
lenders, employees,
(including costs of internal
auditors, audit committee
personnel time, adapting IT
and etc would be a big
systems, implementing
challenge as this would
revised reporting policies
require a considerable time
and processes, training
and effort
personnel and educating
investors, analysts and
members of the board)

| $







  | 


 
 |




  


 
  


  

 
4For example, the Indian
4Under IFRS, companies 4ue to the significant
4Companies also need to standard on intangibles is
would need to differences between Indian
communicate the impact of based on the concept that all
increasingly use fair value GAAP and IFRS, adoption of
IFRS convergence to their intangible assets have a
measures in the IFRS is likely to have a
investors to ensure they definite life, which cannot
preparation of financial significant impact on the
understand the shift from generally exceed 10 years;
statements. Companies, financial position and
Indian GAAP to IFRS. while IFRS acknowledge that
auditors, users and financial performance of
certain intangible assets may
regulators would need to most Indian companies
have indefinite lives and useful
get familiar with fair
lives in excess of 10 years are
value measurement
not unusual
techniques
 |

  


 2


A
 


  


 

|




    

  


   
 |
  !

  |j
· ICAI has categorize the IFRS in five categories based on the extent of changes or the extent
of support required from the regulatory authorities:


    


    
    
   
  


  


   
   
   
  

 |
  

|
 j |
 

IFRSs which do not have any differences IFRS which has certain minor
with the corresponding Indian differences with the corresponding
Accounting Standards Indian Accounting Standards

4 IAS 2 Inventories

4 IAS 11, Construction Contracts 4 IAS 7,Cash Flow Statements

4 IAS 23, Borrowing Costs 4 IAS 20, Accounting for Government

Grants and isclosure of Government
Assistance

4 IAS 33, Earnings Per Share

4 IAS 36, Impairment of Assets

4 IAS 38, Intangible Assets

 |
  
IAS 40, Investment
Property
IAS 18, Revenue (Corresponding Indian
Accounting Standard is
under preparation)

|
  IFRSs which may
require some time to reach a IFRS 2, Share-based
IAS 21,The Effects of level of technical preparedness by Payment
Changes in Foreign the industry and professionals (Corresponding Indian
Exchange Rates keeping in view the existing Accounting Standard is
economic environment and other under preparation)
factors

IFRS 5, Non-current Assets

eld for Sale and
iscontinued Operations
IAS 26, Accounting and (Corresponding Indian
Reporting by Accounting Standard is
Retirement Benefit under preparation)
Plans
 |
  

|
 j |
 
IFRSs having conceptual differences with
the corresponding Indian Accounting
Standards that should be taken up with the
IASB
4 IAS 17,Leases
4 IAS 19, Employee Benefits
4 IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate
Financial Statements
4 IAS 28, Investments in Associates
4 IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures
4 IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent
Liabilities and Contingent Assets
IFRSs having conceptual differences with the
corresponding Indian Accounting Standards
that need to be examined to determine
whether these should be taken up with the
IASB or should be removed by the ICAI itself
4 IAS 12, Income Taxes
4 IAS 24, Related Party isclosures
4 IAS 41, Agriculture (Corresponding
Indian Accounting Standard is under
preparation)
4 IFRS 3, Business Combinations
4 IFRS 6, Exploration for and Evaluation
of Mineral Resources
4 IFRS 8, Operating Segments
 |
 3
3


|
 3 |
 3

IFRSs, the adoption of which would require IFRSs corresponding to which no Indian
changes in laws/regulations Accounting Standard is required for the time
because compliance with such IFRSs is not being.
possible until the regulations/laws are
amended.
4 IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements
4 IAS 8, Accounting Policies, Changes in 4 IAS 29, Financial Reporting in
yper-
Accounting Estimates and Errors inflationary Economies
4 IAS 10, Events After the Balance Sheet ate
4 IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment
4 IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation
(Exposure raft of the Corresponding Indian
Accounting Standard has been issued)
4 IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting
4 IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Measurement (Exposure raft of the
Corresponding Indian Accounting Standard
has been issued)
4 IFRS 1, First-time Adoption of International
Financial Reporting Standards
4 IFRS 4, Insurance Contracts
4 IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: isclosures
6  j 

   
 

  

    

   



4 The ICAI examined whether a stage-wise approach to convergence should be

followed whereby certain IFRS are adopted immediately (Category I) and certain
other IFRS are adopted within a short period of time, say two years (Category II
and III) and the balance standards are adopted only when the laws and regulation
are changed.

4
owever, the ICAI concluded that such a stage-wise approach may result in
several application complexities because many accounting standards are inter-
related. So, considering the challenges to transition, the ICAI has opted for an
approach whereby all IFRS should be adopted for the defined entities for
accounting periods commencing on or after April 1, 2011.

4 The ICAI believes that this transition period till April 1, 2011 will enable all
participants in the financial reporting process to help in building the environment
supporting the adoption of IFRS.
 V 2
§


  |

V 2

4 Complex tasks are easier when divided into manageable pieces and it is true for
IFRS convergence project also. Project can be broken down into three key phases.

 

1. Identify the key dates and the date of ! 

transition to IFRS
2 evelop an IFRS training plan for
accounting and finance personnel. 5 Redevelop reporting manual i.e., develop
3 Identify differences in the relevant IFRS accounting manual modifying chart of
accounting policies. accounts and containing detailed
4 Identify gaps in systems and processes instructions.
to gather information needed under 6 Measure the impact of the differences
IFRS and the currently available identified on the latest financial prepared
information. under Indian GAAP.
7 Apply latest version of IFRS consistently
8 Apply IFRS 1 which deals with first-time


 adoption of IFRS.
9 Identify permitted exemptions from
specified IFRS as per IFRS 1.
10. Prepare an opening IFRS balance
sheet at the date of transition to
IFRS
11 Explain the impact of transition
from previous GAAP to IFRS as
required by IFRS 1
12 Apply IFRS as business as usual.
 |


4 Benefits derived from convergence are lot but also the challenges. The success of the
convergence to IFRS in India will depend on cooperation from government, regulators and
tax departments.

4 Ultimately, it is imperative for Indian entities to improve their preparedness for IFRS
adoption and get the conversion process right. Given the current market conditions, any
restatement of results due to errors in the conversion process would be detrimental to the
company involved and would severely damage investor confidence in the financial system.

4 The transition to IFRS is likely to be challenging for corporate India.
owever, if the
transitioned is planned and managed successfully, it will generally be positive for financial
reporting in India. This will improve the quality and transparency of the financial reporting
process and further align corporate India to the global economy and the global capital
markets.

4 There is an urgent need to address these challenges and work towards full adoption of IFRS
in India. The most significant need is to build adequate IFRS skills and an expansive
knowledge base amongst Indian accounting professionals to manage the conversion projects
for Indian entities . This can be done by leveraging the knowledge and experience gained
from IFRS conversion in other countries and incorporating IFRS into the curriculum for
professional accounting courses.