Professional Documents
Culture Documents
•
A
OR,
I. A PREFATORY DISCOURSE,
CONTAINING
.n AD!lwer to all the Objections of the ,Writer of a Pip. Book, iDtituJed,
" ne Cailtolie C1&rVtialt i!UlJ'tlded," &c. with many new Yacts and'Testimoaies,
in farthet: Confirmation of the general Argument of tile LBTTD :
AliD
II. A POSTSCRIPT,
III wBICR
CONY-ERS MIDDLETON, D. D.
PriIIcipal Librria flf nl8 U!IiM"riIy ,q CIIl6rfcIp.
THE FIFl'H EDITION.
WITH
........
'-an the Governors '" MILTON_~ '
: '
PRINTED FOR THE EDITOR.
And Sold by
II. El' •• ~, 16, Pall-Mall fW. WIL801f, Mews-Gate; R. OGLa, !95, Hoillona;
ad J. M.RJ(:BoUlD80lf, 13, CorDbill.
181'i.
•
THE EDITOR'S DEDICATION.
TO
SHUTE,
LORD BISHOP OF DURHAM.
;r
~[y LOltD,
•
11l
1 Timothy, v.6.
b2
IV
• Four years.
XlII
THE EDITOR.
Chelsea;
.April, ISH!•.
TO
THOMAS,
LORD BISHOP OF NORWICH.
My LORD,
~Iy LORD,
~ttfatot~ lBt~rout£st. I
24
what these Missionaries of Rome are forced to
confess, that my little performance is a real
obstacle to their designs; and that one of the
first steps necessary towards advancing the
Popish Interest in England, is to overthrow the
credit both of the Letter, and its Author.
Our Catholic, therefore, in the execution of
this task, sets out with a general accusation
against me ofJoul pla.1Jand disillgenuity, and a
resoiution to suppress the trutlt; because my
charge against them is grounded only, he says,
" on certain ceremonies and observances of
" . less moment, without taking notice of the
",substantialparts of their'religion, theirbe-
" lief of the Scriptures, of. the.·threeC~ds;
" of the Trinity, the Eucharist Sacrifice, &c.
"which none will pretend to be derived to
" them from the Pagans." This is artfully
tha-own out, to confound the tTne;stateofthe
question, and to prepossess the reader with a
notion, that instead ofPo/Mry,J am attaclliDg
Christianity itself, and sustaining th~cause
of Infidelity, not of Protestantism : .butesery
man of sense will discern the fallacy,' andob-
serve, that it is Popery alone, with which I
am engaged, or that system of ceremonies
25
and doctrines, which is peculiar to the R om-.
iglt Church, as distinguished from other Christ-
ian Churches, the source of which I have un-
dertaken to lay open, and by an historical de-
duction of facts, to trace its origin in a direct
line, from Pagan down to Popish Rome.
. In the farther support of this charge, I shall
now proceed to examine our Author's excep ...
tions to it, in the order as they lie in his Pre-
face, and .vindicate all the particular proof."
of it alleged in my Letter, to which he has
thought proper to give any answer, the chief
of which, as he tells us, are," Incense, Holy
" Water, Lamps and Candles, Votive offer-
" ings, Images, Chapels on the way-sides and
" tops of Hills, Processions, Miracles." [a]
On these I shall join issue with him, and en..
deavour to shew, that his defence of them is
not only frivolous and evasive, but tends
rather to confirm, than to confute the infer ..
ence which I have drawn from them.
48 to· several of these articles, he makes one
general apology, that, " I am mistaken, in
"thinkiQg every ceremony used by the
[6] Pre(. 5. 8.
27
weakness and unprq/itableness, by the more per-
fect revelation of Jesus Christ? [c] If, then,
I should acknowledge my mistake, and re-
call my words, and, instead of Pagan, call
them Jewish ceremonies, would not the use of
-leunsh.rites be abominable still in a Christian
Church, where they are expressly abolished
and prohibited by God himself?
But to pursue his argument a little farther:
while the Mosaic worship subsisted by divine
appointment in Jerusalem, the Devillikewise,
as he tells us, had Temples and Ceremonies of
the same kind, in order to draw votaries to 'his
idolatrous worship, which, after the abolition
of the Jewish service, was carried on still with
great" pomp and splendour, and, above aU
places, in Rome, the principal seat of his
worldly empire. Now it is certain, that in
the early times of the Gospel, the Christians
i
29
by pushing it to its full length,' shall be
obliged to call them, Devilish.
He observes, that I begin my charge with
the use of Incense, as the most notorious
proof of their Paganism, and, like an artful
rhetorician; place my strongest argument in the
front, [d] Yet he knows, that I have assigned
a different reason, for offering that the first:
because it is the first thing that strikes the
senses, and surprises a stranger, upon his
entrance into their Churches. But it shall
be my strongest proof, if he will have it so,
since he has brought nothing, I am sure, to
weaken the force of it. He tells us, that
there was an Altar of Incense ill the Temple of
Jerllsalem, and is surprised, therefore, how
I can call it Heathenish: Yet it is evident,
from the nature of that institution, that it
was never designed to be perpetual, and
. that, during its continuance, God would
never have approved allY other Altar, either
in Jerusalem, or any where else. But let him
answer directly to this plain question; was
there ever a temple in the tcorld not strict!."
[ d] Pref, p. 5.
50
1
31
[p] lb. p. 7.
»2
how easy must. it- be to impose upo1l;tk~ PtHYfr
Cqtholics in England,. and keep them in! tb~
~f;k,. as to the more exceptionable parts of
thein ~o~hip, which, are- openly avowed and
practised: abroad, to the scandal of all the
candid, and moderate even.of their own CQm~
IpUIllon.
But though our: Cat/u)lic seems so mtdJ
ashamed at present- of this Benediction. ci
Horses it' their Clt/ureh, I' can give him such
light into the origin of it, as will mak~biro
proud of it probably for the future;. from! a
story ~ Lhave observed in St. JerOtn; which
s}lews,it to be grounded on a miracle,.and· de.
rived from a Spint: 1- mean St. Hilf,trWn, the
founder of the, M01l(($(ic; order» in Syria. tlfld
Palestule. [q]
(8) Pref'lf' 8.
4J.
l
honourdue to God, to the Altars or departed
mortals?[y] Such a worship, I say, so far
]
I
53
ti& [0] On the 17th January, 1798, while the late Pope
(PIUS VI.) was waiting the result of his letter to the French
government, offering satisfaction for the death of General
DUPHOT, his Holiness appointed a solemn procession of the
three most celebrated relics in Rome. In the proclamation,
publiMhedon this occasion, the sovereign Pontiff thus ex-
pressed himself.-" Your faith shall be animated by the sight
of sacred and holy objects, which the Clergy shall conduct
with devout pomp through the streets to St. Peter's, ex-
posing to public veneration for several days on the high altar
the venerable, most ancient, and most wonderful portrait of
the most holy Saviour-also the miraculous picture of th~
Santa M:aria in Portico-and the sacred chai9s wher~with
the prince of the Apostles was fettered. To any' OD~ whl>
in the aforesaid days shall visit St. Peter's, reciting before
the above mentioned sacred monuments the prayer beginning
.Ante oculos tuos, Domine, &c. or, in lieu of it, will repeat ten
times the Pater-noster and the Ave-Maria, praying as above,
his holit\ess grants for each time, in each day, an ind:ulgelu:e
for ten, years and/ort!! day.~." The portrait of the most
holy Sa,vio,ur hete, mentioned, and supposed to have been
paintedby s.upernatuFal agellC!!, was known b, the appella-
tion of Il Santo r olio, It had not been, publicly exhibited
siace the year 1709, after a terrible earthquake.
i Previous to the procession, the streets were strewed witlt
flowers aad myrtles; aU the religious orders, in their respec-
tive habits, and the cardinala, followed, with an immense
in a block of wood or stone, to produce rain,
or avert a pestilence? Or, can senseless Images
have any influence towards moving the Will
of God? No; their Priests are not so silly as
to imagine it; the sole end of producing them
is, not to move God, but the populace; to
persuade the deluded multitude, that there is
a power in the Image, that can draw down
blessings upon them. from Heaven: A doc-
trine, that repays all their pains of inculcating
it, by a perpetual supply of wealth to the
concourse of people, many f!f the first distinction bare-
foot.' These' inestimable relics remained for three weeks
on the high altar of St. Peter's, and were then exhibited in
the churches of Santa Maria Maggior.e and St. Giovanni in
Laterano. See " A Brief Account of the Subversion of the
Papal Government, by R. Duppa, Esq." sect. 2.
Mr. BELsHA~I, in his History of Great Britain, vol. x,
p. 454. very justly remarks, that it is impossible to read the
pnpalprodamation upon this occasion withont emotions of
indignant contempt. "The nations of Europe," says Mr.
BURKE, "have the very same Christian religion, agreeing in
the fundamental parts, vaJ)ing a little in the ceremonies and
in the subordinate doctrines." (Thoughts On a Regicide
Peace.) It It might eertainly" (says Mr. Belsbam) "with a.I
much plausibility be affirmed, that the professors of rational
and genuine Christianity agree with the Ml!f~iof Constanti-
nople, or the Grand Lama of Tttrtary, intbeir religion, »
with the Pope of Rome, whose claims an;' indeed·the most
impious and impudent of the three."
65
treasury of the Church. [pJ This, therefore,
as it appears from undeniable facts, is the
C3jP [p] That the Church of Rome employs quite as much
art at this moment, as ever she did, to delude the multitude,
may be seen by a most curious publication, entitled It Official
" Memoirs of the Juridical Examination into the Authenti-
" city of the Miraculous Events which happened at Rome
" in the Years 1796-7, including Tile Decree of Appro-
" boHoll, &c. with an account of similar Prodigies" bich
" occurred about the same time at AIIl~ona and other places'
" ill Itaiy. Translated from the French. ~olllpared wittl
" ~ Original Itaiian of Sig. Gio. Marchetti, Apostolic
.. Examil1lltor of the Clergy and President dill Gesu. By
.. the Rev, B. Rayment." London, Keating and Co. 1801.
pp.227.-1n this publication we are told, nay, it i•• worp
by a clOud of witnesses, that no less than twenty-six pictures
of the Virgill Mary opened and shut their eyes, which was
811PPOSedto be a manifestation of her peculiar grace and fa- .
Your to 1he Roman people. At Ancona, the pictare of the
blessed Virgin, under the title of Quem cif all the Saints,
opened and shut its eyes. At Veruli, arid other places, the
pictures of the blessed Virgin, and of her infant son Jesus,
opened and shut their eyes. At Torrice, there was a varia-
tion in the colour of the countenance in a statue of the
blessed Virgin, called our Lad!! of the !In:ell Dolors, and
some of the deponents add, that they observed a Perspira-
tion issue from the countenance. At Cepra7lo, a statue of
ollr Lad!! c1])('lor, harned its eyes. At Frascati, a mw ...
CItloU!lmevement of the eyes was observed in the picture of
a "b[odoll11aAdl/olorata. (His Highness the late Cardinal
Duke of York, Bishop of Frascati, is stated to have been
J' '.In~ye "'itaess" of this mirade, and accordingly he .uthen .. '
'F
66
universal belief of all Popish Countries;
grounded, as they all assert, on the evidence
ticated the same under his hand.) In the United Diocese of
St. Angelo in Vado and Urbania, a picture of the blessed
Virgin, called our Lady oj Afount Carmel, was observed to
open and close its eyes. At Mercatello, in the same diocese
of Urbania, a picture of the blessed Virgin's Assumption into
heaven, moved its eyes. In the convent of St. Liberatus of
the Fathers Minori Osservanti, at the foot of the ApeD"
nines, between Sanginesio and Samaro, in the diocese of
Camerino, a miraculous Perspiration. was observed on the
picture of the Patron Saint, which is kept within an iroD
grate, and above his tomb, in the church of the convent de-
dicated to his honour. This miracle continued at intervals
for the space of twenty-three days. The perspiration was 80
copious, that besides humecting the linen applied to wipe
the face, it moreover wetted the tomb that was underneath.
It is. also affirmed, that not only the aforesaid perspiratiou
was visible, but tears, in great- abundance, gushed from tIJe
eyes of the painting; and that, notwithstanding the great
care taken to wipe them, they were observed to run doWll
even upon the pavement. At Calcata,. in the diocese of
Cioita Castellana, a. miraculous movement wa. observed ill
the eyes of two pictures which are kept in the parochial
church of St, Cornelius and St. Cyprian.. At Tad;, the
eyes of two pictures of the blessed Virgin were. seen to
move.
These miracles had 80 powerful an inBuence over the
minds of the multitude, as to produce an enthuaiaamlittL:
short of madness. The movement of the eyes in the picture
of the Virgin at the Church of St. Silvester, at HOOle,m.de
so strong an impression upon the people, tba~ "a pi_
mother placed her little lame daughter on the altar, and with
67
of perpetual miracles, wrought by the parti-
cular agency of these sacred Images, of which
earnest prayers, ill u'hich she was joilt<td oy the spectators,
implored the cure of her child." And yet the Papists deny,
that they put their trust in images! But the English translator
of these oiJicial Memoirs tells us positively, that " if we
except the ancient and modern Iconoclasts, or image-breakers,
we shall find that a due honour and respect have at all times,
and in all places, been paid to the holy images aud pictures of
Jesus and his devoted servants. The late venerable, learned,
and pious POlltijj; adds he, was accustomed to go and in-
dulge his daily decotions before the image of his patron
Saint in the church of St. Peter." (See Official Memoirs,
p.63. note.) This account is, indeed, confirmed by D.,.
MOORE; in his ' View of Society and Manners in Italy.'
"Pius the sixth performs all the religious functions
of his office in the' most solemn manner, not only on
putflic and extraordinary occasions, but also in the most
common acts of devotion. I happened lately to be at
S1. Peter's church, when there was scarcely any other body
there: while I lounged from Chapel to Chapel, looking at
the sculpture and paintings, the Pope entered with very
few attendants; when he came to the statue of St. Peter, he
was not satisfied with bowing, which is the usual mark of
respect shewn to that image; or with kneeling, which is per-
fOnried'by more zealous persons; or with kissing the foot,
which I formerly imagined concluded the climax of devotion;
he bowed, be knelt, he kissed the foot, and then he rubbed
his brow and his whole head with every mark of humility,
fervour, and adoration, upon the sacred stump.-It is no
more, one half of the foot baying been long since worn awny
by the lip!!of the pious."
I could produce innumerable instances from
their own books.
Thus then, it is, that the Papists, influenced by the exam-
ple of the Head of their Infallible Church, fulfil the com-
mandments of the Almighty! Thou shalt not make unto thg-
serf any graven image: thou shalt not bow doen. to it, nor
'It'orshipit. 111e Scriptures teach us to put our trust in
God, who alone is able to help us; but the Church of Rome
can effect such miracles as to induce the deluded multitude
to forget their Creator, and to put their trust in images and
pictures.
Yet the Papists will ask, are not these miracles true? Are
they not confirmed by the most solemn oaths ef the Clergg?
To which I answer, I, for one, do not believe them to be true.
That the pictures moved their eyes, and perspired, I do not
question; but then these movements and perspirations were
contrived by the tricks of the priests, As to the solemn
oaths of the Clergy, let the reader turn to the note, page IS5.
and see what a solemn oath Robert de Nobili took, and was
commended, too, for taking, in order to deceive the poor
Indians. Besides, there is nothing ill these miracles but
what, the priests have often performed before,-nothing but
what their Pagan ancestors set them the example of doing.
In a word, I \ViIIfurnish the key that shall open the secret of
these miracles. .At the time when they were wrought, Gene-
ral Bonaparte, amazed at the extent and rapidity of his own
conquests, was threatening to proceed to Rome. These pic-
tures" therefore, very naturally opened their eyes and perspired.
They were apprehensive that the French would soon come,
and take them away. In this distress, the Papists acted over
again some of their old tricks; just as their PagQ1t ancestors
were wont to do. It is related by Liv!I' (I. xliii. 13.) that,OD
the approach of some public calamity, tke statue oj'ApOLLO
69
In a Collegiate Church of regular Canons,
called St. ltfary of Impnmeta, about six
do beasts nor cattle lack their god! with us; for St. Loy is
the horseleeeh, and St. ~411tho1t!! the swineherd, &'c. Whert
is God's providence and honour in the mean season? Who
saith, The heavens be mine, and the earth is mille, the fohole
world, and all that in it is: I do give ,dcto,:'/, and I put to
}light: of me be all the counsels and help, ~c. Escep: I
keep the cit!!, in vain doth he watch that keepeth. it. Tholl,
Lord, shalt sa1:eboth mun and beasts. But· we have left him
neither heaven, nor earth, nor water, nor country, nor city,
peace nor war to rule and govern, neither men, nor beasts,
nor their diseases to cure, &c."
See the third part of that excellent Homily of our
Church, " against Peril C!f Idolatr!!."
[.1'] .Hesea, ii. 5.7.
[y] Pref, p.9, 10. 12.
81
G
sages of the Primitive Father's, which teach,
that creatures ouglu not to be adored. [a]
The Abbot de J\!Iarolles relates a converse-
tion, in which he was once engaged, with a
"'Capuchin, who had been employed in several
missions, and a celebrated Preacher of France,
in the presence of an Hugonot Gentleman;
for whose sake the Abbot took occasion to
speak of Images in the same moderate strain,
in which our Catholic thinks fit to treat them
in his present address to Protestants; "That
they were placed in their Churches, not for
the people to adore, or put their trust in
.them, but to edify their senses, by the repre·
sentation of holy things. But the Abbot's
discourse gave offence both to the Friar
and the Preacher; they insisted on a higher
degree of veneration, urged the stories of
their miraculous Images, and the extraordi-
nary devotion that was paid by the Pope,
the Bishops, and the whole Church to some
6f them, which had been known to speak, or
were brought down from' heaven, or made by
[a] Salve Regina; Mater misericordise, vita, dulcedo, et
spes nostra, salve. Ad Te c1amamus exules filii "Eyre, lILc.
Offic. Beat. Virgo MaJdonat m
Mat. v, 35. Index Expurgat,
Madrid 1612.
83
j!
AlI L
Montebello, in order to offer her tbis pimu homage.
lb. hew! of this depota tion, wu ,he BUTtop 'If r.enoill~!!
a5
should sooner pay divine honours to the Foun-
ders of Empires, than to the Founders of
Monasteries. This our Author aggravates
into a heavy charge against me; as if I
were offended to see the Heathen Temples con-
verted into Christian Churches, and had ac-
tually preferred the Pagan Deities before the
Martyrs of Christ. Cd] 'Vhere, according to
his custom, he either widely mistakes, or wil-
fully misrepresents my meaning; for as to the
genuine Saints and lYlartyrs of the Christian
Church, that, is, all those who, in past ages,
have lived agreeably to the rules of the Gos-
pel, or died in the defence of it, I rti,verence
them as highly as they ought to be reve-
I
115
hoped, perhaps, to find some even of our own
Church ready to join with him in the cry;
since he appears to be no stranger to the
offence, which the freedom of this 1)eryLetter
had given to certain men, who are too apt
to consider their own opinions as the standard
of Christian faith, and to treat even the de-
fenders of our religion as deserters, if they do
not submit to act under their direction,
and defend it by their principles. These men
imagined, that I had attacked the popish mi-
raclell with a gaiety that seemed to contemn
all miracles, and particularly those of our Sa-
mur., by invalidating the force of those rules
which Mr. Leslie had established as tilt
criteritm oftrue miracles; whereas the truth
of the matter is, as I have often declared it
to my friends, that at the time of writing the
Letter, I had never read Mr. Leslie's treatise,
nor so mneh as knew what his rules were.
My only.view was, .to expose the forgery of
cthepopiBA . miracles in the strongest manner
that I was able ; and in $pite of all the evi-
dence which they pretend to produce for
them, to shew, that they stood upon no better
ground than those of their Pagan Ance't~.
1 had observed, not only from books but from
12
116
experience, what these Cavillers perhaps were
not so well apprized of, that the pretence ~f
miracles was the grand support of the Rontish
Church, and what gave a sanction to an their
other frauds; that their constant appeal to a
divine power, exerting itself miraculously
amongst them; gave them not only their chief
advantage against protestants, but furnished
the Deists also with the most obvious argu·
ments against revelation itself: for ,,'these
pious cheats, as Mr. Leslie says, are the sorest
disgraces of Christianity; which have bid the
'fairest of anyone contrivance to overturn the
certainty of the miracles of Christ, and the
whole truth of the Gospel, by putting them
all on the same foot." [k] To destroy the
authority, therefore, of these cheats, was to
sap the foundations' of Popery, and overture
the main pillar on which its power subsists;
which was the real, motive of my dwelling
longer on this, than on any other article, a5
our Catholic observes, [I] as weII as of treating
.it with that freedom which alarmed even
some of our Protestants.
[k] See. Leslie'lS Short method widl the Deists, p.24-
'V 01. I. of his Works.
[fJ Preface, p. 4.
117
But the fact is, that the spirit of inquiry with which Eng-
/iJimen were animated at the time of the Reformation, de-
tected the cheat, and exposed to public view, the hidden
Iprings and machinery of diose lying wonders by which the
world had been seduced and enslaved to the tyranny of Rome.
Some of their images were brought to London, and pub-
licly broken there at St. Paufs Cross, in the sight of the
people, that they might be fully convinced of the juggliug
impostures of the Monks. And in particular, the CrucijiJ
of Bo.rlty be Kent, commonly called tile Rood f!I' Gra(e,
to which many pilgrimages had been made; because it was
observed sometimes to bow, and to lift itself up; to shake '
and stir its head, hands, and feet; to ron its e>'es, move the
lips; and bend its brows: all which were looked upon by
the abused multitude as the effects of a divine power. These
were now publicly discovered to have heen cheats. For the
springs were shewn by which all these motions were made,
&c.-See BtJI\NET'S History of the Reformation, vol, I.
p.242.
[s] :M. de :Marolles takes occasion to observe, from a
fact, which happened in Paris, 1644, how easily people,
possessed with a superstitious regard to miracles, can per-
suade themselves that they see, what in truth has no exist.
ence. The story is this; a certain man, out of a mere whim,
or with design perhaps to try his pistol, shot it off against a
sign in the street, Oil which tile Firgi» :Mar!! was painted.
The oe~hbourhood beiug alarmed, ran out to see what waJ,
125
K
130
that they should not suffer allY man to beguile them f!f their
reward,in a 'Coluntary humility and worshipping of angels,
intruding into those things' tchid: he hath not seen, 'caillly
puffedup by hisfleshly mind, and not holding the hew1,Jrom.
fI!hichall the bodg by joints and bands hacing nourishment,
millistl'edand knit together, increasetb 'a:ith the increase of
God.
<t ST. CURYSOSTO:\I,on the Epist. to the Colossians, S. 1.
p. 90, saith, it was the chief design of that epistle, to beat
dowll the error of them who made addresses to God by
angels. And S. vi. p. 123, he saith, there were some who
said we must come to God by angels, not immediately by
Christ, for that is too high for us. .
<t This error, saith TUEODORET, upon the text, remained
K 2
132
in India: but they all rest upon no other au-
thority than the suspected relations of those
hath the same force as if it had been made in a general
council.
, it But whatever the notion of the Colossians was, the
apostle takes occasion to make a general declaration against
any religious worship that should be paid to angels j in
which declaration, since he makes no exception in favour of
the practice of invoking them as patrons or intercessors with
God (which he must very well know if it was then usual) we
may conclude, that he intended to condemn any such !)rac,
tice: in order to impress this more forcibly upon the mind>
of Christians, St. John was not suffered to pay even 8uch
worship or respect to all angel, as the high dignity and excel·
lency of such a spirit might otherwise have naturally required;
be was twice commanded to u:orship God, i. e. him ollly.
(Rev. xxii, 9.)
" But if it was not allowable to worship angels, it may. I'
with more reason, be concluded, that departed saints are Dot ;
to be worshipped; because, whatever reason holds against ;
worshipping angels, holds at least as strongly against worship-
ping saints departed. And there is one other circumstance
peculiarly strong against the latter; namely, there is no suf-
ticient ground either from reason or the Scripture to believe
that they are acquainted with our affairs, that they can always
hear our vocal, or, at least, ever be acquainted with our
mental petitions. The Romish school-men, indeed, have
imagined a way by which they hold the saints to see all
things, viz. in the essence of God, as in a mirror: but IS
this is a fiction. inti rely without any foundation in reason or
the holy' Scripture, no stress at aU can be laid upon it.
" The proofs which some Romisb writers draw from the
133
[z] Itaque cum neque illi meam, neque ego illorum lin-
guam intelligerem, &c. Xaverii Epist. l. v. Sane labori-
osum est, eorum, quibuscum verseris, funditus ignorare ser
monem. ib. i, 14. Faxit Deus, ut ad divinarum explica-
tionem rerum, Japonicam liuguam condiscamus quam pri-
mum. TUID demum aliquam Christiana- rei navabimus ope-
ram. N am nunc quidcm inter eos tanquam mute quredam
ItatUlilversamur, &c. ib.L iii. 5.
<I;)' After 'St. Xaverius, HOBERT DE NOBILl is looked
upon by the Jesuits as the ehief apostle of the Indians. This
man took incredible pains to acquire a knowledge of the re-
ligion, custo~. 'nd language of Madura, sufficient for the
purposes of nis ministry. But this was not all; for, to stop
the mouths of hi. opposers, and particularly of those who
treated his character of Brachman as an impostor, he pro-
duced an old, dirty parchment, in which he had forged, in
the ancient Indian characters, a deed, shewing that the
Brachmans of Rome were of much older date than those of
India, and that the Jesuits of Rome descended, in a direct
line, from the God Brama. Nay, Father Joucenci, a learned
Jesuit, tells us, in the Risto!")' of his Order, something yet
more remarkable; even that Robert de N obili, when the
authenticity of his smoaky parchment was called in question
by some Indian unbelievers, declared upon oath, before the
assembly of the Bracbmans of Madura, that he (Nobili)
136
Sir Thomas Roe, in a letter to the Arcltbishap
fJf Canterbury, from the Court of the great
Mogul, [a] relates a fact very applicable to
our present subject; " That the Jesuit's
House and Church in that country happen-
ing to be burnt, the Crucifix remained un-
touched, which was given out as a miracle.
derived really and truly his origin from the God Brama,
"Is it not astonishing" (asks Dr. MACLAINE) <t that this
Reverend Father should acknowledge-is it not monstrous
that he should applaud, as a piece of pious ingenuity, this
detestable instance of perjury and fraud?" (See MOSHEIM'.
Eccl. Hist. v, 5. p. 11. note.)
(0- [a] Sir Thomas Roe went as ambassador to the Court
of the Great Mogul ill 1614, where he remained four yea,s. In
1621, he went as ambassador to the Grand Seignior, and
continued there till ] 628. UpOll his return, Sir Thomas
brought with him, as a present from Cyril, patriarch of Con-
stantinople to Charles 1. the famous Alexandrian MS. of
the Greek Bible, since transcribed and pu~lillhed by ]Jr.
Grabe.
The unfortunate Cgril, for opposing the tyranny of the
church of Rome and refusing to submit to the pope, WI!
slandered and persecuted all his days by the Jesuits, and at
last basely murdered at their instigation. His life, transac-
tions,anddeplorable fate, have been recorded byTholUll8 S'»th,
in his Narratio de Vittz, Studiis, Gestis et Martyrio Cyrilli
Lucaris, which is the third article of his MilcellaJlea, pu'"
lished at London in 8vo. in the year 1586.
1S1
The King called for the Jesuit, and .ques-
tioned him about it; but he answered ambi-
guously; The King then asked, whether' he
did not desire to convert him? And being
answered in the affirmative, .replied, Yos
speak of your great miracles, and of many
done in the name of your Prophet: if you
will cast the Crucifix: into a fire before me.
and it does not burn, I will become a Chris-
tian. The Jesuit refused the trial, as unjust;
answering, that God was not tied to the call
of man; that it was a Sin to tempt him;
andthat he wrought miracles according to his
own will; yet he offered to cast himself into
the fire, as a proof of his own faith, whick
the King would not allow. U pop. this, there
arose a great dispute, begun by the Prince;
a stiff Mahometan, and hater of Christians;
whourged, that it was reasonable to try our
religionafter this manner; but withal, that if
the Crucifix did burn, then the Jesuit should
be obliged to tum Moor: He alleged exam-
ples also of mira~les said to be wrought for
less purposes than the conversion of so
mightya King; and spoke scornfully of Jesus
Christ." Yet nothing could move the Jesqit,
IS8
" SIR,
" You are desired by one of your Sub-
scribers, instead of amusing yourself with
writing the life 'oj Cicero, to answer the C ath..
olicOhristian~written (as the Author declares)
in answer to, and in order to shew your false
reasonings in your comparison of the Popish
tIIItl Pagan ceremonies €if religion- Thi4 CatJw..
lie Christian abuses the Protestant lteligion.
taxes its Divines with false translations and
quotations out of Scripture, which he pre-
tends'they\do not understand or misapply, to
make out their own Heretical doctrines.-
Such scandalous reproaches brought upoa
yourself, and also upon the Protestant, Reli-
gion by your writings, make it incumbent on
you to wipe off these stains which by your
means are contracted, before you enter upon
any other subject.
I am, Yours, «c:"
16S
•
170
I
f!
t
175
at once with steams cif incense, how natural is
it to imagine one's self transported "into the
temple of some Heathen deity, or that of the
Paphian Venus described by Virgil?
N
178
179
Pkltina,
in his lives of the Popes, and other
authors, ascribe the institution of this holy-
Wier to Pope Alexander thefirst; who is said
to ha\lC lived about the year of Christ 1.1S;
but it could not be introduced so early, since,
for some ages after, we find the primitive fa-
tien speaking of it, as a custom purely hea-
MenU1,.and condemning it as impioVland tit-
Krtabk. J UIItin Martyr says, " that it WR8
invented by dlelllons, in imitation of the true
baptism signified by ~ Prophets, that their
YOtatiesmight al80' uYe their pretended pu-
rificatim& by'water 'I' [It] and the Emperor Ju-
lima, out of spite to the Chrilt;Qfl8, used to
order the victuals in.themarkets to belpf'inkled
. flith l&oly*Olfder<j on purpose either to ,'stUve,
or force them to eat, what by their own
principles they esteemed polluted. [i]
Thus we see what contrary notions the Pri-
mitive and Rorms'"
Church M«' ~ this cere-
mony: thefirst condemns it as superstitious,
abominable, and irreconcileable with Christiflni-
QVATVOR ET QVADRAGINTA
INCORRVPTVM DIVINA
VIRTVTE SE'RVATVM OCVUIS FIDELIVM
EXPOSITVM A DILECTIS IN CHRISTO
FILIIS SVB EIVSDEM S. PATRIS ALTARI
PERPETV AE SEPVLTVRAE MORE MAIORVM
COMMENDATVM EST
ANNO SALVTIS M.DC.XXXVIlI.
191
NVMINI. NVMINI
DIVI GEOBGJI MERCVIUI SACR.
POLLENTIS. POTENTIS HERCVLI. VICToilJ.
INVICTJ. POLLENTI. POTENTI
INVICTO.
PRARBTITI IOVI
DIVIS s.
PIIAESTITIB'VS IVVANTIBVS IIUb
GEORGIO STEPANOQVE DRABVS
CVM DEO OPT. MAX. QVE. CVM
lOVE.
[cJ Sed ecquem tam amentem esse putall, tui ilW, 1UO
vescatur, Deum credat esse? Cic. de Nat. Deer, iii.
e:t1" [d] AVERROES, an eminentArahiall physician, thought
he had great reason for triumpbiJ.1g over the Gospel of
Christ, on account of dris article of faith. If I have tra-
velled over the world, says he, and have found divers sects;
but so sottish a sect or law I 'never found, as is the sect of
the Christians, because with their own teeth they dt'VOUf'
the God whom they worship." (See Archbishop TILLor-
But their temples are not the only 'places
wherewe sec the proofs and overt-acts of their
SON'S admirable Discourse agaillstTransubstantiation, where
thispassage is cited.)
A later author of good credit tells us, that a F~enrh priest
at Constantinople went to the Vizier in full divan, and be-
gun with declaring his intention to embrace the Mahometall
religion: at the same time he drew out of his pocket a box
full of consecrated hosts, which he himself had deified as a
priest,and whereon the worms had preyed, crying out-
Seehere.the Gods of the Romish creation, 'which cannot prt-
·\(I1'e themselvesfroJJl corruption.-(De la Motraye's Tra-
vels, London Edit. 1723. Vol. I.p. 222.)
Hence we perceive how extremely absurd the doctrine of
Transubstantiation is.- This word was first used by Petrus
Blessensis,anno 1160. "Petrus Blessensis primos omnium
jiLit, qui in re Eucharistic« Trausubstantionis sxxabulum
asurpassedicitur;" Cave ii. 223.
JOllTiN informs us, that" Till Innocent III. (A. 1215.)
themanner of the change in the eucharist was not accounted
anarticle of faith: but he in the Council of Lateran esta-
blishedTransubstalltiation, both the doctrine and the aord.
Matthew Paris (says he) does justice to this Pope by saying,
tbat be was the most avaricious and ambitious of men, and
capable of committing aU sorts of ~I'imes. He adds, that
Innocent caused 3e7)ellt!l articles of faith to be read before
the Council, and commanded the holy fathers there as-
sembled to approve them in the lump, rdthout elllerillg into
any examinatien, And Allix affirms, that the decree which
t.'Jtablish~ transubstantiation never obtained the force of II
law till some time afterwards; and indeed the doctrine. of
transubstantiation, notwithstanding this decision, was still
224
e:t)o [g] The Popes did not always presume to display this
frantic pride. In the year 800, Charles the Great, or
Charlemagne, was made Emperor of Rome, and crowned
by Pope Leo III. who prostrated himself before Mm, and
acknowledged him as his temporal lord. But the popes in
following times learned better things, and treated kings lIIId
emperors as their vassals, slaves) and footmen.
According to several doctors of the Romish communion,
I the homage paid to the Pope byki$$ing Ms'toe, is not a civil
ceremony, or human respect, but a religious homage founded
on texts of Scripture, and rendered to the Pope not 8$ a
Prince, but as a God.
DR. MOORE (View of Society and Manners in Italy, v,
!. p. 50.) gives a pleasant account of his friends and himself
being presented to the late Pope. His Holiness, it seems,
indulgent to the prejudices of the British nation, had agreed
to dispense with the ceremony of kissing his toe; and there-
fore a very low bow, on being presented, was all that he re-
quired of them. II A bow!" cried the Duke of Hamilton
to the ecclesiastic who usually attends the English On such
occaSioQs, and who, without the knowledge of his Grace,
had effected this treaty with the Pontiff, II I should not have
given myself any trouble about the matter, had I suspected
that all was to end in a bow. I looked on ki$$ing tlu! toe as
the only amusing circumstance of the whole; if that is to be
271
The great variety of their religious orders
and societies of Priests seemed to have been
formed upon the ,plan of the old colleges or
fraternities of the Augurs, Pontifices, Salii, Era-
ires Aroales, o/c. The Vestal virgins might
furnish the hint for the foundation cf Nun-
neries: [h] and I have observed something
antbor'£\ ~ost~(tipt•
•
THE EDITOR.[aJ
'!1
rise if the French should come; and I believe they did not
give up half their arms. There are guns, bayonets, and
pikes, hid in the country."
[The following words were then spoken by Beaghan, with-
out his having been asked any questions, and spoken with an
earnestness and in a manner that shewed his sincerity.]
" Now, gentlemen, remember what I tell you: Ij'you and
the protestants are ever in the pott:er oj the catholics again,
as they are now in YOUY s, the.lfwill not lease one rif you ali-.:e;
)'00 will all go smack smooth; even those w.ho campaigned
UJith them, if things had galle '«'ell '«'ith them, would ill the
end, have been killed. I HAVE llEARD THEM SAY SO
Jr1ANY TIMES.
Taken before us, August 23, 1799, , his
CHRISTIAN WILSON,Sheriff. JAMES ~ BEAGHAS,
J. H. LYSTER,JustiC!!ojthe Peace. mark.
Having arrived at the place of execution, captain .Boyd
brought him aside, and read his confession, and asked him if
it was correctly takea down, to which he answered in the
affirmative. Just as the executioner was about to tum him
off, he called out, saying,." Stop!" and lifting up his cap
said, with a v,ery loud voice, " Captain Boyd, you have taken
down my confession perfectly correct; if it was not for the
priests I never would have been g~ilty of murder, nor have
dragged five unfortunate persons out of the windmill to be
murdered." (See SIR RICHARD MUSGRAVE'S Memoil1oi"
the late Rebellion in Ireland, Appendix,. pp. 100-101.)
319
The same may be said, and with the greatest truth, at this
320
Justice and of the Laws was put, which were· so far from
preventing our ruin, that they were made the means and i1l-
etruments thereof, and it had been much better (or us to have
had no laws at all, and been left to our natural defence, thllll
to be cheated into a necessity of submission by law. that
_ere executed only to pun;,", and .oot to defend us."
327
principles of those, who invited that glorious
hero, King William hither; and doubtless
they are anxious to receive a portion of that
praiset which must ever be bestowed on those
great men. But what ,can they mean by pro-
moting the Catholic cause?" It will be in vain
for them to plead, that they think it but just,
that the Catholics should have complete tole-
ration; since some of the greatest patriots
and wisest men that ever lived,-men whose
uames will ever stand conspicuous as the most
.zealous champions of freedom, thought that
popery was no fit subject for toleration. Such
wa~ the opinion of that bold asserter of civil
and religious liberty, :MILTON ; En] and such,
let me add, was the opinion of the great
LOCKE. [0] .Aud here I cannot forbear to cite
..
541
Houses of Parliament
went donm on their knees
to acknowledge the errors of the Protestant
Religion. [c]
Nor let it be objected, that the recurrence
of such an event is impossible in our days;
for, should the Catholics be released from
their existing restraints, does the reader sup-
pose, that they would not exert themselves to
the utmost to return Catholic Members to
Parliament? Would' they not employ all
their resources, and, contribute all their endea-
vours, to accomplish that object? When
king James went over to Ireland, he con-
trived, by the aid of the Catholics, to fill the
House of Commons with Popish Members. [d]
Now, should the power of making and repeal-
ing laws come into such hands, what security
could protestants promise to themselves? "\'Ve
have seen enough, I think, of what the Ro-
mish religion prescribes to its disciples; and
should they but conform to its doctrines,
we may readily ascertain what we have to
than any other person, entreated him, for the mercy of God,
to come and save the prisoners. He, iu a very unconcerned
manner, replied, " It was no affair of his," and requested
the captain would sit down and take a glass of wine with
bim, adding, " That the people must ~ gratified." The
captain refused the bishop's invitation j and, tilled with ab-
horrence and distress of mind, walked silently away! ! !
In his description of the camp on Vinegar-hill, Sir Richard
says, I' it was constantly attended by from ten to twenty
priests, who daily said mass at the bead of each rebel column,
and afterwards pronounced an exhortation to animate them
in the extirpation of heresy, and in the EXCLUSIVE establish-
ment of their own, the only true orthodox faith."
On the day when the dreadful massacre of protestants
took -place at Wesford, the papists made a processioo
through part of the town, bearing a black flag, with a cross,
and the letters 1\1. W. s. inscribed on it in white; this meant
lllurder without Sill! on the other side was a red cross.
After this flag had been carried about for some time, it was
fixed on the custom-house quay, near the fatal epot where so
much blood was soon after shed; and where it remained
flying for about two hours before the butchery began.
Soon after the massacres at Wexford, the following sen-
teuces were carved on the rails of the portcullis of the bridge,
A.a
354
the place where they were perpetrated; and they were le-
gible in the month of Jnne, 1':'99. "Sacred to the . chris-
tian doctrine of sending orange-men to the meadows of ease,
Jnne, 179S: The holy hereticks that were slain]" (See Sir
Richard Musgrave's Memoirs, pp. 485. 512.)
355