Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COSMOLOGICAL
CONSTRUCT THEORY:
A HISTORICAL
PERSPECTIVE
SANNES’
THEORY OF MUCH
SANNES' COSMOLOGICAL CONSTRUCT THEORY:
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
have conceived this bold idea? When water freezes and becomes
ice – apparently something entirely different from water – why is
it that the thawing of ice forms something which seems
indistinguishable from the original water? (Leucippus) is driven
to the conclusion that in these transitions the ‘essence’ of the
thing has not changed at all. ”
1
Sky Publishing Corporation, Sten Odenwald, 1991, p. 1
2
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 323
3
Cosmology / Astrophysics, June, 2007, Albert Einstein, 1954, p. 1
4
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 341
1
“ Newton, the first creator of a comprehensive workable system
5
5
Ibid, p. 275
6
Ibid, pp. 325, 326
2
“The first attempt to lay a uniform theoretical foundation was the
work of Newton. In his system everything is reduced to the
following concepts: 1) Mass points with invariable mass; 2)
action at a distance between any pair of mass points; 3) law of
motion for the mass point. There are not, strictly speaking, any
all-embracing foundations, because an explicit law was
formulated only for the actions-at-a-distance of gravitation; while
for other actions-at-a-distance nothing was established a priori
except the law of equality of actio and reactio. Moreover, Newton
himself fully realized that time and space were essential
elements, as physically effective factors, of his system, if only by
implication.
7
Einstein: The Life and Times, Donald W. Clark, World Publishing, 1971, p. 74
3
single summer delivered three hammer blows to the foundations
of contemporary science. ”
8
“ To Newton, light was a stream of particles moving according to
mechanical laws, although his contemporary, Christiaan
Huygens, thought it might be instead a vibration in an
unspecified medium, much as sound was a vibration in the air. ”
“ The word acceleration is here used to denote any change in
9
“ 10
Law I. – Every body perseveres in its state of rest or of
moving uniformly on a straight line, except in so far as it is made
to change that state by external forces.
8
Ibid, p. 77
9
Matter and Motion , J ames C lerk Maxwell, 1952 Dover P ublic ations , Inc ., p. 23
10
Ibid, p. 28
4
“ 11
THE SECOND LAW OF MOTION
11
Ibid, p. 32
12
Ibid, p. 44, 42
5
“THE THIRD LAW TRUE OF ACTION AT A DISTANCE
“The fact that a magnet draws iron towards it was noticed by the
ancients, but no attention was paid to the force with which the
iron attracts the magnet. Newton, however, by placing the
magnet in one vessel and the iron in another, and floating both
vessels in water so as to touch each other, showed
experimentally, that as neither vessel was able to propel the
other along, with itself, through the water, the attraction of the
iron on the magnet must be equal and opposite to that of the
magnet on the iron, both being equal to the pressure between the
two vessels. ”
“ 13
…we cannot…regard Newton's statement as an appeal to
experience and observation, but rather as a deduction of the
third law of motion from the first. ”
“ 14
The total energy of any material system is a quantity which
can neither be increased nor diminished by any action between
the parts of the system, though it may be transformed into any of
the forms of which energy is susceptible. ”
“ 15
…The most remarkable fact about the attraction of gravitation,
(is) that at the same distance it acts equally on equal masses of
13
Ibid, p. 42
14
Matter and Motion , J ames C lerk Maxwell, 1952, p. 55
15
Ibid, p. 111
6
substances of all kinds… Every portion of matter attracts every
other portion of matter, and the stress between them is
proportional to the product of their masses divided by the square
of their distance. ” (Newton's exact words.)
“ 16
(Newton)…excluded from his Principia all mention of the
cause of gravitation, reserving his thoughts on this subject for
the 'Queries' printed at the end of his Opticks.
“The attempts which have been made since the time of Newton
to solve this difficult question are few in number, and have not
led to any well-established result. ”
“ 17
(After Newton)…thought only began to take a new turn with
the wave-theory of light and the theory of the electromagnetic
field of Faraday and Maxwell. It became clear that there existed in
free space states which propagated themselves in waves, as well
as localized fields which were able to exert forces on electrical
masses of magnetic poles brought to the spot. Since it would
have seemed utterly absurd to the physicists of the nineteenth
century to attribute physical functions or states to space itself,
they invented a medium pervading the whole of space, on the
model of ponderable matter – the aether, which was supposed to
act as a vehicle for electromagnetic phenomena, and hence for
those of light also… The aether…thus became a kind of matter
16
Matter and Motion , J ames C lerk Maxwell, 1952, Dover P ublic ations , Inc ., p. 121
17
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 280
7
whose only function was to act as a substratum for electrical
fields which were by their very nature not further analyzable. ”
“ 18
…The electric field theory of Faraday and Maxwell represents
probably the most profound transformation of physics since
Newton's time… The existence of the field manifests itself only
when electrically charged bodies are introduced into it…in
space. ”
“ 19
Meantime, it took physicists some decades to grasp the full
significance of Maxwell's discovery, so bold was the leap that his
genius forced upon the conceptions of his fellow workers. Only
after (Heinrich) Hertz had demonstrated experimentally the
existence of Maxwell's electromagnetic waves had resistance to
the new theory broken down.
18
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 304
19
Ibid, pp. 305, 306
8
“ 20
Since the interaction of bodies was supposed to be
accomplished through fields, there had also to be a gravitational
field in the aether whose field-law had, however, no clear form at
that time. The aether was only supposed to be the seat of all
forces acting across space…
20
Ibid, p. 281
21
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 70
9
“ 23
When H. A. Lorentz started his creative scientific work,
Maxwell's theory of electromagnetism had already won out. But
there was inherent in this theory a peculiar complexity of the
fundamental principles which prevented its essential features
from revealing themselves, distinctly. Although the field concept
had indeed displaced the concept of action at a distance, the
electric and magnetic fields were not yet conceived as primary
entities, but rather at states of ponderable matter which was
treated as a continuum.
22
Ibid, p. 73
23
Ibid, pp. 74, 75.
10
“A good idea of the interpretation of Maxwell's electrodynamics
then prevailing may be gained from the study of H. Hertz's
investigation on the electrodynamics of moving bodies.
11
“ 24
…In him, Maxwell's equations in empty space held only for a
particular coordinate system distinguished from all other
coordinate systems by its state of rest. This was a truly
paradoxical situation because the theory seemed to restrict the
inertial system more strongly than did classical mechanics. This
circumstance, which from the empirical point of view appeared
completely unmotivated, was bound to lead to the theory of
special relativity. ”
“ 25
As far as the aether – that bearer of light which fills the whole
universe – is concerned, after Faraday's discovery which I have
already mentioned and also independently of it, many attempts
were made to exploit the aether in the theory of electricity also. ”
“ 26
You know, however, that the true founders of our present
views on this subject were (James) Clerk Maxwell and (Heinrich)
Hertz. In that Maxwell developed further and constructed a basis
for the ideas put forward by Faraday, he was the creator of the
electromagnetic theory of light, which is undoubtedly well known
to you in its broad outline. He taught us that light vibrations are
changes of state of the same nature as electric currents. We can
also say that electrical forces which change direction extremely
rapidly – many billions of times a second – are present in every
beam of light.
24
Ibid, p. 75
25
H. A . L orentz’s Nobel L ec ture, Dec ember 11, 1902
26
Ibid, Dec ember 11, 1902
12
“Who does not know the brilliant experiments by which he (H.
Hertz) confirmed the conclusions that Maxwell had drawn from
his conclusions?… The result of these and other investigations
into the waves propagated in the aether culminated in the
realization that there exists in Nature a whole range of
electromagnetic waves, which, however different their
wavelengths may be, are basically all of the same nature…
Although it was principally Hertz's experiments that turned the
basic idea of Maxwell's theory into the common property of all
scientists, it had been possible to start earlier with some
optimism on the task of applying this theory to special problems
in optics…
“It has been known since the time of Huygens that this is
connected with the unequal rate of propagation of beams of light
in different substances. How does it come about, however, that
the speed of light in solid, liquid, and gaseous substances differs
from its speed in the aether of empty space, so that it has its own
value for each of these ponderable substances; and how can it
be explained that these values, and hence also the refractive
index, vary from one colour to another? …A successor to
Maxwell now has merely to translate conception of co-vibrating
particles into the language of the electromagnetic theory of
light…
13
“We will return to the propagation of light in ponderable matter.
The covibrating particles must, we concluded, be electrically
charged; so we can conveniently call them 'electrons'…
14
“I hardly need to mention that, quite apart from this question of
constitution, it will always be important to come to a closer
understanding of the transmission of apparent distant actions
through the aether… To this end it was necessary first of all to
develop a theory of electromagnetic phenomena in moving
substances, with the assumption that the aether does not partake
of their motion. To find a starting-point for such a theory, I once
again had recourse to electrons. I was of the opinion that these
must be permeable to the aether and that each must be the
centre of an electric and also, when in motion, of a magnetic
field… Finally, I added certain assumptions about the force
acting on an electron, as follows: this force is always due to the
aether of the immediate vicinity of the electron and is therefore
affected directly by the state of this aether and indirectly by the
charge and velocity of the other electrons which have brought
about this state. ”
“ 27
…H. A. Lorentz found a way to an electrodynamic theory of
bodies in motion, a theory which was more or less free from
arbitrary assumptions. His theory was built on the following
hypotheses.
27
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 305
15
the elementary particles of matter carry unalterable electric
charges, and on this account, are subject on the one hand to the
actions of ponderable forces and on the other hand possess the
property of generating a field. The elementary particles obey
Newton's law of motion for material points… ”
“ 28
The theory failed, moreover, to give any explanation
concerning the tremendous forces which hold the electric
charges on the individual particles…
28
Ibid, p. 306
29
Ibid, p. 345
16
“ 30
It is often the case that an otherwise compelling theory, in
order to be brought into agreement with observation, requires
some apparently unnatural modifications.
30
T he C os mologic al C ons tant, 2001, Max P lanc k, G es ells c haft, p. 4
31
Ibid, p. 5
32
Ibid, p. 8
33
E ins tein, T he L ife and T ime , C lark, 1971, World P ublis hing C ompany, p. 67
17
but as discrete bursts for which he used the Latin ‘How much’ or
quanta. The size of quanta was, moreover, directly related to the
frequency of the electromagnetic wave with which they are
associated, violet light, which has twice the frequency of red
light, having associated quanta twice as large as those
associated with red light. ”
“ 34
…Einstein's conception of light as being formed of light
quanta – or photons as they were christened – in itself involved a
paradoxical contradiction from which a man of lesser mental
stature might have edged away. For while light consisting of
discrete packets of energy, as indivisible as the atom was still
thought to be, conformed – if it conformed to anything – to the
corpuscular theory of Newton's day, the idea also utilized
frequency, a vital feature of the wave theory… Even so, Einstein
had to face the embarrassing contradiction that Planck had tried
to avoid; for some purposes, light must be required as a stream
of particles, as Newton had regarded it; for others, it must be
considered in terms of wave motion… (Niels) Born and (Werner)
Heisenberg, were to produce a conception of the physical world
that could be regarded in terms either of waves or of particles… ”
“ 35
Planck himself was reluctant to accept Einstein's
development of this, and as late as 1912 was rejecting, in Berlin
34
Ibid, p. 69
35
Ibid, p. 69, 70
18
lectures, the idea that light traveled through space as bunches of
localized energy. ”
“ 36
The Special Theory of Relativity that was to give Einstein his
unique position in history… (was) entitled simply On the
Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Yet this dissertation of some
nine thousand words overturned man's accepted ideas of time
and space in a way which was, as the Times of London once put
‘
it, an affront to common sense. ’”
“ 37
But it was Planck's law of radiation that yielded the first exact
determination independent of other assumptions – of the
absolute magnitudes of atoms. More than that, he showed
convincingly that in addition to the atomistic structure of matter
there is a kind of atomistic structure of energy, governed by the
universal constant ‘h’, which was introduced by Planck.
19
Despite remarkable partial gains, the problem is still far from a
satisfactory solution. ”
“ 38
Since the interaction of bodies was supposed to be
accomplished through fields, there had also to be a gravitational
field in the aether whose field-law had, however, no clear form at
that time. The aether was only supposed to be the seat of all
forces acting across space… ”
“ 39
Now a question arises. Since the field exists even in a
vacuum, should one conceive of the field as a state of a ‘carrier,’
or should it rather be endowed with an independent existence
not reducible to anything else? In other words, is there an ‘ether’
which carries the field; ”
“ 40
The general theory of relativity owes its origin to the attempt
to explain a fact known since Galileo's and Newton's time but
hitherto eluding all theoretical interpretation: the inertia and the
weight of a body, in themselves two entirely distinct things, are
measured by one and the same constant, the mass… for there is
presupposed (in the Galilean-Newtonian mechanics) a
mysterious property of physical space, conditioning the kind of
coordinate – systems for which the law of inertia and the
Newtonian law of motion hold good. ”
38
Ibid, p. 281
39
Ibid, p. 345
40
Ibid, p. 330
20
“ 41
For the time being, we have to admit that we do not possess
any general theoretical basis for physics, which can be regarded
as its logical foundation. The field theory, so far, has failed in the
molecular sphere. ”
“ 42
(what if)…All mass was merely congealed energy; all energy
merely liberated matter. Thus the photons, or light quanta, of the
photoelectric effect were just particles which had shed their
mass and were traveling with the speed of light in the form of
energy; while energy below the speed of light had been
transformed by its slowing down, a transformation which had the
effect of congealing into matter. ”
“ 43
In 1917, Albert Einstein tried to use his newly developed
theory of general relativity to describe the…prevailing idea at the
time…that the universe was static and unchanging…Take a cubic
meter of space and remove all matter and radiation from it: Most
of us would agree that this is a perfect vacuum. ”
“ 44
Maxwell's equation for empty space remains unchanged if the
spatial coordinates and the time are subjected to particular kinds
of linear transformations – the Lorentz's transformations
('covariance' with respect to Lorentz's transformations). ”
41
Ibid, p. 334
42
E ins tein T he L ife and T ime , C lark, 1971, World P ublis hing C ompany, p. 99
43
S ky P ublis hing C orporation, S ten Odenwald, 1991, p. 1
44
Ideas and Opinions of Albert Einstein, Crown Publishers, Inc., 1954, p. 346
21
“ 45
(Prior to 1905)… The physicists were still far removed from
such a way of thinking; space was still, for them, a rigid
homogeneous something, incapable of changing or assuming
various states… Then came the special theory of relativity with
its recognition of the physical equivalence of all inertial systems.
The inseparability of time and space emerged in connection with
electrodynamics, or the law of the propagation of light… With the
discovery of the relativity of simultaneity, space and time were
merged in a single continuum in a way similar to that in which
the three dimensions of space had previously been merged into a
single continuum. Physical space was thus extended to a four-
dimensional space which also included the dimension of time.
The four dimensional space of the special theory of relativity is
just as rigid and absolute as Newton's space. ”
“ 46
The physical world is represented as a four-dimensional
continuum. If I assume a…metric in it and ask what are the
simplest laws which such a metric can satisfy, I arrive at
relativistic theory of gravitation in empty space…I arrive at
Maxwell's equations for empty space.
“At this point, we still lack a theory for those parts of space in
which electrical charge density does not disappear. De Broglie
conjectured the existence of a wave field, which served to
explain certain quantum properties of matter. ”
45
Ibid, pp. 281, 282
46
Ibid, p. 274
22
“ 47
…Meanwhile the great stumbling-block for a field-theory of
this kind lies in the conception of the atomic structure of matter
and energy. For the theory is fundamentally non-atomic in so far
as it operates exclusively with continuous functions of space, in
contrast to classical mechanics, whose most important element,
the material point, in itself does justice to the atomic structure of
matter. ”
“ 48
…In 1998, after the observation of a supernova whose light
was apparently stretched by the rapid expansion of the universe,
scientists concluded that the rate of expansion was increasing.
So was born the theory of ‘dark energy,’ which has been deemed
responsible for the unexpected acceleration, while it remains
largely undefined… The measurements from the survey imply
dark energy does not become diluted like matter does as it is
spread across wider spaces, providing the most compelling
evidence yet for a theory involving the cosmological constant.
France's Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) and National
Research Mission pour la Science et la Technologie Center
(CNRS) were involved in the survey. ”
“ 49
Observations in the 1990's, however, proved that the universe
was not only flying apart, it was doing so faster and faster. It
seemed to point to a dark energy filling space that actually
47
Ibid, p. 330
48
New S c ientis t, J uly 13, 2007
49
S c ientific A meric an.c om, 11/23/2005
23
repelled ordinary matter with its gravity, in contrast to all other
known stuff, including dark matter… ‘Our observation is at odds
with a number of theoretical ideas about the nature of dark
energy that predict that it should change as the universe
expands and, as far as we can see, it doesn't,’ says team member
Ray Carlberg of the University of Toronto. ”
“But the finding brings to the fore another question: the so-
called cosmological coincidence. Observations like this one
seem to prove that regular matter and dark energy have similar
densities at precisely this moment in time, even though the
density of matter has been declining steadily since the big bang.
Even Einstein couldn't answer why that would be? ”
“ 50
The discovery by Hubble that the universe is expanding
eliminated the empirical need for a static world model (although
the Einstein static universe continues to thrive in the toolboxes
of theorists, as a crucial step in the construction of conformal
diagrams)… As discussed below, there is better reason than ever
before to believe that ‘A’ is actually nonzero, and Einstein may
not have blundered after all. ”
“Particle physics, however, brings a different perspective to the
(cosmological constant) question. The cosmological constant
50
T he C os mologic al C ons tant, 2001, Max P lanc k, G es ells c haft, pp. 6, 7, 8
24
turns out to be a measure of the energy density of the
vacuum… ”
“Quantum mechanics adds another contribution, from the zero-
point energies associated with vacuum fluctuations…”
“ 52
When I examine myself and my methods of thought I come to
the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than
my talent for absorbing positive knowledge. ”
“53Physics theories of the late 19th century postulated that, just
as water waves must have a medium to move across (water), and
audible sound waves require a medium to move through (air), so
also light waves require a medium, the ‘luminiferous aether,’ or
51
B B C News , 11/16/2006
52
E ins tein T he L ife and T imes , Donald W. C lark, World P ublis hing C ompany, 1971, p. 87
53
Ibid, p. 345
25
the ‘ethereal aether.’ Because light can travel through a vacuum,
it was assumed that the vacuum must contain the medium of
light. Because the speed of light is so great, designing an
experiment to detect the presence and properties of this aether
took considerable ingenuity.
26
“A famous experiment took place in 1881 by two Americans,
Michelson and Morley, and what they did was to test whether
there exists such an aether by examining what happens to the
motion of light in the universe. The idea, to begin with, is rather
like going swimming in a river, so you think of the aether as
flowing past us, rather like a great stream. Supposed you swim
across to the other bank; suppose this is a hundred metres, and
you swim a hundred metres against the flow and a hundred
metres back, and you time yourself on these two swims. Well, if
you do everything exactly the same each time, there’ll be a time
difference in how long it takes you to swim 200 metres by the
route where you never go against the flow, and where you have
to against the flow and then with the flow. You would be able to
detect whether there was a flow of the stream by comparing the
round swim times. If there was no current, you should have
exactly the same time to do the two trips. What Michelson and
Morely did was to set up an experiment which timed the travel of
light on two different paths at right angles to each other. This
requires rather fancy technology and very, very high precision
measurement using what’s now become known as an
interferometer. You can shine a beam which gets split, you can
send light up and back, and you can allow light to go through
and come back. You have the distances equal, and if the light
returning is not coming back at the same moment and is slightly
out of phase, you get interference fringes, which you can
measure with fantastic precision. This great experiment which
they performed, probably the most famous null experiment in
27
modern physics, discerned no time travel difference for the light
in the two paths, and this, as Einstein predicted, is what you
should see if there is no aether. If there had been aether, you
would find a time travel difference. This experiment pretty much
did away with the idea that there was this extraordinary or
ethereal fluid that we were moving through. Einstein then
developed the general theory of relativity which contains the idea
that there can be so-called vacuum universes, universes which
just contain waves or gravity, they don’t contain any material at
all.
28
“ 54In physics [today] there is no concept considered exactly
analogous to the aether. However, dark energy is sometimes
called quintessence due to its similarity to the classical aether.
Modern physics is full of concepts such as free space, space
foam, Planck particles, quantum wave state (QWS), zero-point
energy, quantum foam, and vacuum energy.”
54
P hys ic al R eview L etter 87, 211801, 19 November 2001, p. 2
55
A G uided T our of S trange S tellar S ys tems ,
http: //www.as tronomyc afe.net/anthol/w8s 0.html
29
“ 56Big bang cosmology is based on Einstein's general theory of
relativity. It is a theory transcending both Newton's mechanics
and Einstein's special theory of relativity, introducing us to
concepts that do not exist within the older theories. Nor are these
concepts easily comprehensible by our common sense which
has been honed by organic evolution to see the world only
through a narrow set of glasses.
56
Wikipedia, J uly 31, 2007, http: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B ig_bang
30
“ Unlike all other forms of motion that have been previously
observed, cosmological 'motion' cannot be directly observed. It
can only be INFERRED from observations of the cosmological
redshift, which general relativity then TELLS US means that the
universe is expanding.
31
from here [special relativity]’. To the extent that general relativity
has been tested and found correct, we have no choice but to
accept its consequences at face value.
32
distance in a relationship described by Hubble's law. Combined
with the assumption that observers located anywhere in the
universe would make similar observations (the Copernican
principle), this suggests that space itself is expanding.
Extrapolation of this expansion back in time yields a state in the
distant past in which the universe was in a state of immense
density and temperature. This hot, dense state is the key premise
of the Big Bang. Observations now place the age of the universe
at around 13.7 billion years.
33
“ Starting in 1924, Hubble painstakingly developed a series of
distance indicators, the forerunner of the cosmic distance ladder,
using the 100 inch Hooker telescope at Mount Wilson
Observatory. This allowed him to estimate distances to galaxies
whose redshifts had already been measured, mostly by Slipher.
In 1929, Hubble discovered a correlation between distance and
recession velocity—now known as Hubble's law. Lemaître had
already shown that this was expected, given the cosmological
principle.
34
“ 58Heisenberg's uncertainty principle also underlies one of the
most bizarre aspects of quantum theory. The vacuum of space-
time is by no means ‘nothing.’ It is a foaming sea of constantly
bubbling particles that flash into existence for fleeting
microseconds only to be absorbed back into the mother sea from
which they momentarily borrowed a tiny bit of energy.
“ Time and energy, like position and momentum, also are subject
to the uncertainty relation. If the time during which energy is
measured is known exactly, the amount of energy becomes
uncertain. The shorter the time interval, the greater the
uncertainty. When the interval is short enough, it allows energy
to appear from nowhere in the vacuum of space provided it
vanishes fast enough back into the mother sea to preserve the
vacuum's overall zero energy.
58
S keptic al Inquirer, Ibid, p. 3, 8/1/07
35
particles are called ‘virtual’ to distinguish them from their ‘real’
forms that persist in time.
36
(Nature, Vol. 246, pp. 396-97). He suggested that a vacuum
fluctuation may have triggered the big bang! As he put it, ‘Our
universe is simply one of those things which happen from time to
time.’ This implies that space and time existed before the bang.
Other physicists have since proposed slightly different ways a
quantum fluctuation in a vacuum devoid of space and time could
create a runaway universe, though how something could
fluctuate without space and time is unclear. Of course our
universe could not emerge from absolutely nothing. There would
have to be quantum fields to fluctuate, leaving unanswered the
ultimate question of where quantum fields and their laws came
from, or why there is something rather than nothing. ”
“ 59Albert Einstein was the first well-known scientist who spent
most of his life trying to find a TOE; he believed that the only task
was to unify general relativity and electromagnetism.
59
Wikipedia, http: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T heory_of_everything
37
electroweak unified field theory and in unifying all the forces
except for gravity (which in the present theory of general
relativity is not a force) in the grand unification theory. One
missing piece in a theory of everything involves combining
quantum mechanics and general relativity into a theory of
quantum gravity. Physicists believe this unification is possible
due to the fact that the current theoretic ideas seem to converge
towards a single theory. For example, from general relativity it is
known that gravity travels at the speed of light and not
instantaneous[ly] as predicted by Newton. This seems to show
some kind of underlying symmetry, as it is peculiar that both
gravity and electromagnetism propagates at the speed of light.”
60
“ One of the biggest mysteries in cosmology could be explained
by a controversial theory in which the universe explodes into
existence, not just once, but repeatedly in endless cycles of
death and rebirth.”
60
s pac e.c om – R ec yc led Univers e T heory C ould S olve C os mic Mys tery ,
http: //www.s pac e.c om/s c ienc eas tronomy/060508_mm_c yc lic _univers e.html
61
E ins tein: T he L ife A nd T imes , C lark, 1971, World P ublis hing C ompany, p. 78
62
E lec tron A nd P os itron,
http: //hyperphys ic s .phy-as tr.gs u.edu/hbas e/partic les /lepton.html
38
constrained by the Pauli exclusion principle, a fact that has key
implications for the building up of the periodic table of
elements. ”
“ 63In physics, a lepton is a particle with spin-1/2 (a fermion) that
does not experience the strong interaction (that is, the strong
nuclear force). The leptons form a family of elementary particles
that are distinct from the other known family of fermions, the
quarks.
“ There are three known flavors of lepton: the electron, the muon,
and the tau. Each flavor is represented by a pair of particles
called a weak doublet. One is a massive charged particle that
bears the same name as its flavor (like the electron). The other is
a nearly massless neutral particle called a neutrino (such as the
electron neutrino). All six of these particles have corresponding
antiparticles (such as the positron or the electron antineutrino).
All known charged leptons have a single unit of negative or
positive electric charge (depending on whether they are particles
or antiparticles) and all of the neutrinos and antineutrinos have
zero electric charge. The charged leptons have two possible spin
states, while only one helicity is observed for the neutrinos (all
the neutrinos are left-handed, and all the antineutrinos are right-
handed).
63
Wikipedia, http: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L epton
39
“ The masses of the leptons also obey a simple relation, known
as the Koide formula, but at present this relationship cannot be
explained.
40
The best known charged lepton is the electron (e). The other two
charged leptons are the muon (µ) and the tau (), which are
essentially electrons with a lot more mass. The charged leptons
are all negative. ”
“ The tau lepton (often called the tau, tau particle, or occasionally
the tauon, symbol) is a negatively charged elementary particle
with a lifetime of 2.90×10-13 seconds and a mass of 1777 MeV/c2
(compared to 938 MeV/c2 for protons and 0.511 MeV/c2 for
electrons). It has an associated antiparticle (the anti-tau) and
neutrinos (the tau neutrino and tau antineutrino).
“ The tau lepton and its antiparticle carry the same electric
charges as the electron and positron, respectively.
41
“ The tau is the only lepton that can decay into hadrons—the
other leptons do not have the necessary mass. Like the other
decay modes of the tau lepton, the hadronic decay is through the
weak interaction.
“ Martin Perl shared the 1995 Nobel Prize for physics with
Frederick Reines. The latter was awarded his share of the prize
”
for detecting the neutrino.
42
“ The positron is the antiparticle of the electron, and when a
positron enters any normal matter, it will find an abundant supply
of electrons with which to annihilate. The energy released by the
annihilation forms two highly energetic gamma rays, and if one
assumes that the momenta of the positron and electron before
the annihilation, the two gamma ray photons must travel in
opposite directions in order to conserve momentum.
“ The tau is the most massive of the leptons, having a rest mass
some 3490 times the mass of the electron, also a lepton. Its mass
is some 17 times that of the muon, the other massive lepton.
43
“ The fact that the above decay is a three-particle decay is an
example of the conservation of lepton number; there must be one
electron neutrino and one muon neutrino or antineutrino in the
decay.
“ Leptons and quarks are the basic building blocks of matter, i.e.,
they are seen as the ‘elementary particles’. There are six leptons
in the present structure, the electron, muon, and tau particles
and their associated neutrinos. The different varieties of the
elementary particles are commonly called ‘flavors’, and the
neutrinos here are considered to have distinctly different flavor.
44
model assumes that there are no more than three generations.
One of the pieces of experimental evidence for that is the
measured hydrogen/helium abundance ratio in the universe.
When the process of nucleosynthesis from the big bang is
modeled, the number of types of neutrinos affects the abundance
of helium. The observed abundance agrees with three types of
neutrinos. ”
“ 64Several concepts in science are inter-related. The concepts:
Magnetic field, electric current and electrons constitute a group
of concepts in science, which are inter-related in a particular
fashion. Maxwell's equation relating an electric current to a
magnetic field is one such relation. Thus an electric current,
which is due to the motion of electrons, leads to a magnetic field
around the current carrying conductor. One may draw an analogy
between this relation with the relation ‘gravitation is the cause of
attraction between two bodies which leads to acceleration,’
between the concepts gravitation attraction and acceleration.
Using such relations we can explain a wide variety of
phenomena. For example, the relation between a electrons in
motion with magnetic field helps us to explain why there is an
electric current that can be detected in a coil of copper wire when
a magnet is brought close to it. As a scientist, we all learn to
64
Subatomic Particles: from Electrons to Quarks, by Rakesh Mohan Hallen, Published in
Science Reporter, New Delhi, India, http://www.scribd.com/doc/1025/Journey-from-
Electrons-to-Quarks
45
accept these relations are the basic axioms of science that
cannot (or need not?) be explained.
46
leptons (a class of fundamental particles that respond only to
electromagnetic, weak and gravitational forces and do no take
part in strong interactions, electrons belong to this class), do not
feel the strong force. Only particles with colour, principally the
quarks, feel the strong force. It is a very short-range force. The
strong force binds quarks together in clusters to make more
familiar subatomic particles, such as protons and neutrons.
“ There are three possible ‘colours’ of the quarks: red blue and
green. Protons and neutrons have a net colour of zero and only
combinations of quarks having net colour zero are accorded
stability by the strong force. The strong force also depends on
the spin orientation of the nucleons (protons and neutrons). This
dependence adds to the complexity of this force. In an atomic
nucleus, the strong force between the protons and neutrons
(which does not depend on the electric charge on the nucleons)
competes with the electromagnetic force (which depends on the
charge). When the strong force is able to overcome the
electromagnetic force, the nuclei is stable. However, nuclei
having a number neutrons mach larger than the number of
protons are inherently unstable (radioactive) because the
stability of the combination due to strong force is less than the
unstability due to the electromagnetic force.
47
Thus there are rules for conservation of mass; conservation of
charge, spin, etc. etc. The concept of graviton is a particle, which
can be said to be responsible for the gravitational force. It is just
like photons, which can be held responsible for the
electromagnetic force. Another group of particles, known as
gluons, is held to be responsible for the strong force has been
postulated but its acceptance by the scientific community awaits
experimental evidence. Thus the question why gravitons do not
result from a collision of neutrinos cannot be attempted as yet. ”
“ 65Scientists believe that the number of electrons existing in the
known universe is at least 10>9. This number amounts to an
average density of about one electron per cubic metre of space.
Astronomers have estimated that 90% of the mass of atoms in
the universe is hydrogen, which is made of one electron and one
proton. ”
“ 66The electromagnetic field is a physical field produced by
electrically charged objects. It affects the behavior of charged
objects in the vicinity of the field. ”
“ The electromagnetic fields extends indefinitely throughout
space and describes the electromagnetic interaction. It is one of
the four (4) fundamental forces of nature (the others are 1)
gravitation; 2) the weak interaction and the 3) strong interaction).
65
Wikipedia
66
Wikipedia
48
“ The electromagnetic field is a physical field produced by
electrically charged objects. It affects the behavior of charged
objects in the vicinity of the field.
67
Wikipedia
49
fractional charge of 1/3 or +2/3. The antiparticle equivalents of
these have the opposite charge. There are other charged
particles.
68
Faraday's Law Of Induction, Wikipedia
69
Wikipedia
70
Wikipedia
51
“ Electric fields contain electrical energy with energy density
proportional to the square of the field intensity. The electric field
is to charge as acceleration is to mass and force density is to
volume.
52
1. Electrostatic forces are much greater than gravitational
forces (by about 1036 times).
2. Gravitational forces are attractive for like charges,
whereas electrostatic forces are repulsive for like
charges.
3. There are no negative gravitational charges (no
negative mass) while there are both positive and
negative electric charges. This difference combined
with previous implies that gravitational forces are
always attractive, while electrostatic forces may be
either attractive or repulsive.
4. Electric charges are invariant under Lorentz
transformations while gravitational charges (relativistic
mass) are not. ”
“ 71In physics, Ampère's circuital law, discovered by André-Marie
Ampère, relates the circulating magnetic field in a closed loop to
the electric current passing through the loop. It is the magnetic
equivalent of Gauss's law.
71
Wikipedia
53
equation (112) in his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force
(http://vacuum-physics.com/Maxwell/maxwell_oplf.pdf). ”
“ 72In physics and mathematical analysis, Gauss's law is the
electrostatic application of the generalized Gauss's theorem
giving the equivalence relation between any flux, e.g. of liquids,
electric or gravitational, flowing out of any closed surface and
the result of inner sources and sinks, such as electric charges or
masses enclosed within the closed surface. The law was
developed by Carl Friedrich Gauss. By Divergence theorem
generalized Gauss's law can be used in any context where the
inverse-square law holds. Electrostatics and Newtonian
gravitation are two examples. The differential form of four
equations underpins electromagnetic theory. ”
“ The gravitational form of Gauss's Law is largely a theoretical
curiosity, but can be used by analogy to the electrostatic form of
Gauss's Law to prove that the gravitational force of any body on
any other body can be treated as though both masses were
concentrated at their centers. Like the electric field, the magnetic
field exerts force on electric charge — but unlike an electric field,
it exerts force only on a moving charge, and the direction of the
force is orthogonal to both magnetic field and charge's
velocity. ”
72
Wikipedia
54
“ 73A changing electromagnetic field propagates away from its
origin in the form of a wave. These waves travel in vacuum at the
speed of light and exist in a wide spectrum of wavelengths.
Examples of the dynamic fields of electromagnetic radiation (in
order of increasing frequency): radio waves, microwaves, light
(infrared, visible light and ultraviolet), x-rays and gamma rays. In
the field of particle physics this electromagnetic radiation is the
manifestation of the electromagnetic interaction between
charged particles. ”
“ 74An electron cannot leave its proton neutron core too far
because of the strong proton pull… When a circuit is closed,
negative ions in the cell release an electron, side by side, the
particular electron is inserted into one conductor atom and the
conductor atom releases one electron. ”
“ 75An electric current i flowing around a circuit produces a
magnetic field and hence a magnetic flux Ø through the circuit.
The ratio of the magnetic flux to the current is called the
inductance, or more accurately, self-inductance of the circuit.
(term coined by Oliver Heavyside in February 1886.)
73
Wikipedia
74
A natomy Of E lec tric al C onduc tion, Wikipedia
75
T rans vers e E lec tric Waves , Wikipedia
55
“ Any two adjacent conductors can be considered as a capacitor,
although the capacitance will be small unless the conductors are
close together or long. ”
“ 76Electric potential may be conceived of as ‘electric pressure’.
Where this ‘pressure’ is uniform, no current flows and nothing
happens. This is similar to why people do not feel normal
atmospheric air pressure: there is no difference between the
pressure inside the body and outside, so nothing is felt.
However, where this electrical pressure varies, it produces an
electric field, which will create a force on charged particles. ”
“ 77Coulomb's law, which describes the interaction of electric
charges is similar to the Newtonian gravitation law. This
suggests similarities between the electric field E and the
gravitational field g, so sometimes mass is called ‘gravitational
charge’.
56
present. This generalized electric potential cannot be simply
interpreted as a potential energy, however.
57
intrinsic properties of the object and the position of the object,
and obey certain other mathematical rules.
“ Two such forces are the gravitational force (gravity) and the
electric force in the absence of time-varying magnetic fields. The
potential of an electric field is called the electric potential.
“ DESCRIPTION
“ The flux through an element of area perpendicular to the
direction of magnetic field is given by the product of the
magnetic field and the area element. More generally, magnetic
flux is defined by a scalar product of the magnetic field and the
area element vector. Gauss's law for magnetism, which is one of
the four Maxwell's equations, states that the total magnetic flux
78
Wikipedia
58
through a closed surface is zero. This law is a consequence of
the empirical observation that magnetic monopoles do not exist
or are not measurable. ”
“ 79In physics, a magnetic field is a solenoidal vector field in the
space surrounding moving electric charges and magnetic
dipoles, such as those in electric currents and magnets. Where
such a field is present, magnetic force acts on other such bodies.
All materials respond to a magnetic field to some degree, by
opposing it or being attracted to it.
79
Wikipedia
59
“ The rotating magnetic field is a key principle in the operation of
alternating-current motors. A permanent magnet in such a field
will rotate so as to maintain its alignment with the external field.
This effect was conceptualized by Nikola Tesla, and later utilised
in his, and others, early AC (alternating-current) electric motors.
A rotating magnetic field can be constructed using two
orthogonal coils with 90 degrees phase difference in their AC
currents. However, in practice such a system would be supplied
through a three-wire arrangement with unequal currents. This
inequality would cause serious problems in standardization of
the conductor size and so, in order to overcome it, three-phase
systems are used where the three currents are equal in
magnitude and have 120 degrees phase difference. Three similar
coils having mutual geometrical angles of 120 degrees will create
the rotating magnetic field in this case. The ability of the three-
phase system to create a rotating field, utilized in electric motors,
is one of the main reasons why three-phase systems dominate
the world's electrical power supply systems.
60
“ In 1882, Nikola Tesla identified the concept of the rotating
magnetic field. In 1885, Galileo Ferraris independently
researched the concept. In 1888, Tesla gained U.S. Patent
381,968 for his work. Also in 1888, Ferraris published his
research in a paper to the Royal Academy of Sciences in Turin.
61
equations and this results in the appearance of the magnetic
force term vXB.
62
“ The quantum-mechanical motion of electrons in atoms
produces the magnetic fields of permanent ferromagnets.
Spinning charged particles also have magnetic moment. Some
electrically neutral particles (like the neutron) with non-zero spin
also have magnetic moment due to the charge distribution in
their inner structure. Particles with zero spin never have
magnetic moment which is the consequence that a magnetic field
is the result of motion of electric field.
63
tensor), and that one stationary observer may perceive a
magnetic force where a moving observer perceives only an
electric Field. Thus, using special relativity, magnetic forces are a
manifestation of electric fields of charges in motion and may be
predicted from knowledge of the electric fields and the velocity of
movement (relative to some observer) of the charges.
64
“ 80When a photon has quantum energy higher than the rest
mass energy of an electron plus a positron, one of the ways that
such a photon interacts with matter is by producing and electron-
positron pair.
65
“ 83Zero-Point Energy (ZPE) is a term for the energy that
constantly fluctuates in the vacuum of space and at the heart of
all matter. ZPE keeps the atom constantly jiggling. (Werner)
Heisenberg’s famous uncertainty principle forbids it to become
motionless… The incessant fluttering of all particles when at
absolute zero has been verified in numerous ways… In the
famous Casimir effect, ZPE forces two parallel metal plates to
move closer together. ZPE causes low-level noise in microwave
receivers. It plays a role in the surface tension of liquids, in
images on eye retinas, in the scattering of light that makes the
sky blue, and many other physical phenomena. In Cosmology, it
sends out radiation from black holes. Its pressure prevents
gravity from collapsing white dwarf stars. ”
“ 84In particle physics, we’re familiar with the role of the vacuum
in very subtle and sophisticated ways. If you take an electron and
you put it down in a vacuum, that vacuum is full of particles of
negative and positive electric charge, appearing and
disappearing all the time on immeasurably short time intervals,
once you put the electron down, the oppositely charged,
positively charged virtual electrons in the vacuum all get slightly
attracted to this electron and surround it with a shield of positive
charge. So if you fire in another electron, it doesn’t interact and
83
S keptic al Inquirer: Zero-P oint E nergy, Martin G ardner, 8/1/07, pp. 2, 3
84
Wikipedia
66
scatter as strongly as you might have thought. If it comes in with
a rather low energy, it doesn’t get a look at the negative charge at
the centre at all; it just sees the positive shield, and deflects
rather weakly. If you throw it in at high energy, then it goes right
through the penetrating shield and gets a look at the full negative
charge in the middle and deflects strongly. This can all be
measured, checked, rather precisely. It’s like having two hard
billiard balls, and you surround one with a woolly cloth cover. If
you throw the other ball in rather gently, it will tend just to
interact with the cloth cover, but if you throw it in rather hard,
then it will really bang into the ball and it will rebound strongly.
This is known as asymptotic freedom: as the energy becomes
greater, the electromagnetic interaction becomes stronger. The
Nobel Prize was given in physics this year for that discovery, to
Wilczek, Gross and Politzer. ”
“ 85Yet, our quest for an understanding of the origins of the
universe remains incomplete since gravity has yet to be brought
into unity with the remaining forces on a theoretical basis. ”
“Vacuum, unlimited in extent, of much higher quality than that
obtainable on earth and free from particulate and gaseous
contaminations. ”
85
T he Dec ay Of T he F als e V ac uum, S ten Odenwald, p. 5 of 5, 1983, K almbac h P ublis hing,
T he S pac e R eview, Marc h 22, 2004, J eff F ous t
67
“ 86Heisenberg's uncertainty principle also underlies one of the
most bizarre aspects of quantum theory. The vacuum of space-
time is by no means ‘nothing.’ It is a foaming sea of constantly
bubbling particles that flash into existence for fleeting
microseconds only to be absorbed back into the mother sea from
which they momentarily borrowed a tiny bit of energy.
“ Time and energy, like position and momentum, also are subject
to the uncertainty relation. If the time during which energy is
measured is known exactly, the amount of energy becomes
uncertain. The shorter the time interval, the greater the
uncertainty. When the interval is short enough, it allows energy
to appear from nowhere in the vacuum of space provided it
vanishes fast enough back into the mother sea to preserve the
vacuum's overall zero energy.
“ This energy that randomly pops out of empty space takes the
form of particle-antiparticle pairs that mutually annihilate. This
happens much too fast to be observed, but can be inferred from
other phenomena. On the average, the pairs exist for about
0.00000 00000 00000 00000 1 of a second, with a maximum
distance between them of about 0.00000 00001 of a centimeter.
86
S keptic al Inquirer, Ibid, p. 3, 8/1/07
68
“ Every type of particle known is believed to emerge briefly from
the churning vacuum, the lighter particles such as electrons and
photons more frequently than heavier particles such as protons,
neutrons, and quarks. It is theoretically possible that a macro
object such as an apple might be created for an instant, but the
probability of this is far too low to allow it. These ghostly
particles are called ‘virtual’ to distinguish them from their ‘real’
forms that persist in time.
69
fluctuate without space and time is unclear. Of course our
universe could not emerge from absolutely nothing. There would
have to be quantum fields to fluctuate, leaving unanswered the
ultimate question of where quantum fields and their laws came
from, or why there is something rather than nothing. ”
“ 87Since a ‘perfect vacuum’ contains no charged particles,
vacuums normally behave as perfect insulators.
87
V ac uum, Wikipedia
88
T he P lanc k E ra, S ten Odenwald, C opyright © 1984 K almbac h P ublis hing.
70
gravitational force between them is insignificant when compared
to the other three forces of Nature. ”
“ 89It is this curvature of space that results in gravity, not the
direct action of one object on another.
89
Newton, Mac h, E ins tein, Infinite Mas s P aradox, C os mology/A s trophys ic s , J uly 2007
90
The Planck Era, by Sten Odenwald, Copyright (C) 1984 Kalmbach Publishing.
71
particles called Gravitons. If gravity really does have such a
quantum property, its effects should appear once quarks and
electrons can be forced to within 10(-33) centimeter of one
another, a distance called the Planck length.
72
“ In the language of General Relativity, gravity is a consequence
of the deformation of space caused by the presence of matter
and energy. Gravity is just another name for the amount of
curvature in the geometry of 3-dimensional space. In Quantum
Gravity theory, gravity is produced by massless gravitons so that
gravitons now represent individual packages of curved space
that travel through space at the speed of light.
73
“ 91…The attractive force of gravity arises due to exchange of
virtual gravitons, in the same way as the electromagnetic force
arises from exchange of virtual photons. This reproduces general
relativity in the classical limit. However, this approach fails at
short distances of the order of the Planck length, where a more
complete theory of quantum gravity is required. Many believe the
complete theory to be string theory. ”
“ 92The gravitational form of Gauss's Law is largely a theoretical
curiosity, but can be used by analogy to the electrostatic form of
Gauss's Law to prove that the gravitational force of any body on
any other body can be treated as though both masses were
concentrated at their centers.
91
Wikipedia
92
Wikipedia
93
P hys ic s F A Q1, Don K oks , P hillip G ibbs , 2002,
http: //www.gres ham.ac .uk/printtrans c ript.as p? E ventId=258
74
supposition that, the universe, at a quantum level teems with
virtual particles in a continuous state of fluctuation. The Casimir
effect has been measured with respect to photons. Experiments
found this force emanating from virtual photons in a vacuum –
particles of light. – flitting in and out of existence.
94
P hys ic al R eview L etter 87, 211801, 19 November 2001, p. 1
95
“ T he C as imir F orc e…” , P hys ic s World, A s trid L ambrec ht, 9/1/2002,
75
the slightest perturbation will make the pencil fall into a more
stable equilibrium position. Similarly, vacuum fluctuations cause
an excited atom to fall into its ground state. ”
“ 96I mentioned my results to Niels Bohr, during a walk. That is
nice, he said, that is something new. I told him that I was puzzled
by the extremely simple form of the expressions for the
interaction at very large distances and he mumbled something
about zero-point energy. That was all, but it put me on a new
track. ”
“ 97All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident. ”
96
H. B . G . C as imir, P . W. Milonni, T he Quantum V ac uum, (A c ademic P res s , New Y ork,
1994)
97
A rthur S c hopenhauer
76
ANALYSIS
B y 1917, E ins tein unders tood that his own general relativity
mathematic al equations required that the univers e mus t either be
expanding or c ontrac ting. E ins tein introduc ed his c os mologic al
c ons tant to pos tulate a finite s table univers e. B ut by 1935, when
E ins tein applauded (literally) the work of L emaître’s B ig B ang
T heory of the C reation of the univers e, he abandoned the
c onc ept that the univers e was eternal, s table and finite.
77
univers e. In 1935, L emaître even predic ted that c os mic rays may
be left over artifac ts of the B ig B ang’s c reation of the univers e.
B efore his death in 1966, L emaître learned of proof of his theory
by P enzias and Wils on.
When P enzias and Wils on, in 1964, dis c overed the s moking
gun of c os mic mic rowave bac kground radiation, they provided
definitive proof of a “ B ig B ang,” c urrently c alc ulated as
oc c urring approximately 13.7 billion years ago.
T his res idual c os mic mic rowave bac kground radiation was
predic ted by G amow and A lpher, in 1948, in their famous
c os mogony paper, whic h importantly advanc ed the B ig B ang
theory of the c reation of the univers e. T hat paper outlined, with
great pres c ienc e, their predic tions about the univers e’s relative
perc entages of hydrogen and helium. Moreover, perhaps mos t
as tonis hingly, s aid paper predic ted that the afterglow of this B ig
B ang would now res ult in a univers e wide temperature of 5
degrees K elvin above abs olute zero. 16 years later, it was
determined that the univers e wide temperature is 2.7 degrees
K elvin above abs olute zero.
78
res ults of the WMA P mis s ion in 2006 made the c as e for c os mic
inflation s eem very c ompelling.
Hoyle’s c onc ept of nuc leos ynthes is within s tars was firs t
publis hed in 1946. T his explained, c onvinc ingly, the pres enc e in
the univers e of elements heavier than helium. In 1948, when
G amow and A lpher publis hed a paper pos tulating that hydrogen
and helium (in their predic ted proportions as s inc e c onfirmed)
had to have been c reated in the B ig B ang, s c ienc e took a giant
s tep forward. Hoyle advanc ed this work by his theory that the
rarer elements have been c reated in s upernovas .
79
SANNES’
THEORY OF MUCH
80
• L es s than 1 billionth of a billionth, at mos t, of the total
matter and energy of the Univers e exis ts as s omething as
large and detec table as a quark or lepton.
81
• L eptons and quarks , over 4 billion times a s ec ond, having
pic ked up energy from c utting the lines of forc e of paired
dark matter partic le/waves , power the “ univers al bubble.”
• In 1982, res earc h res ults obtained by tes ting of our firs t dark
matter motor prototype inexorably and immediately led me
to c onc lude that the “ univers al bubble” mus t be expanding
with s lowly but ever inc reas ing s peed. T his c onc lus ion was
c onfirmed in 1998.
82
• Mic hels on-Morley did not des troy WIP P /Wave aether.
E ins tein’s s pec ial relativity and photoelec tric effec t did not
des troy WIP P /Wave aether. A t the Univers ity of L eiden, in
1920, E ins tein hims elf s aid “ We may s ay that ac c ording to
the general theory of relativity s pac e is endowed with
phys ic al qualities in this s ens e, therefore, there exis ts an
aether.”
• 98
When the “ univers al bubble” of our lates t B ig B ang was
one year old, the s eparations between the galaxies were
NOT inc reas ing at 300 times the s peed of light. T he s peed of
light is s till the Univers al s peed limit.
• S pac e and time did not c ome into exis tenc e with the las t B ig
B ang, at “ time zero.”
• Matter and energy are eternal, they were not “ c reated quite
literally from the nothingnes s of c urved s pac e time.”
98
S ky P ublis hing C orporation, S ten Odenwald, 1993
83
• E ins tein unders tood that gravity was tugging at every bit of
matter – s o the “ univers al bubble” had to c ollaps e into a B ig
C runc h under its own weight. S o E ins tein made up the
c os mologic al c ons tant, a L ambda notation that expres s ed
that empty s pac e is not really empty at all – it has a latent
energy. F riedmann’s mathematic s and Hubble’s
as tronomic al obs ervations toppled the L ambda s ign in
general relativity. WIP P /Wave theory is a tool to find the
truth of c os mology.
• When E ins tein obs erved: “ for if no partic ular s tate of motion
c an be as c ribed to the aether, there does not s eem to be any
ground for introduc ing it as an entity of a s pec ial s ort,”
there was s c ant evidenc e of a W IP P /Wave quantum s oup
Univers e.
• Dark matter motor tes t res ults likewis e forc e the nec es s ary
modific ations of the applic able work of F araday, Maxwell,
Hertz, Huygens , F res nel, and P lanc k, among others .
84
• F res nel’s aether hypothes is was c orrec t, as far as it went.
• A s E ins tein onc e wrote: “ Now a ques tion aris es . S inc e the
(elec tromagnetic ) field exis ts even in a vac uum, s hould one
c onc eive of the field as a s tate of a “ c arrier,” or s hould it
rather be endowed with an independent exis tenc e not
reduc ible to anything els e? In other words , is there an
aether whic h c arries the field . . .? ” T hat ans wer is yes .
• E ven the c onc eption of B orn and Heis enberg that the
phys ic al world c ould be regarded either in terms of waves
or partic les is rendered s us c eptible to reanalys is by the
prototype dark matter motor tes t res ults .
• P lanc k’s law of radiation mus t now inc orporate WIP P /Wave
theory. P lanc k’s univers al c ons tant “ n” and WIP P /Wave
theory require s c ienc e to “ (find) a new c onc eptual bas is for
all phys ic s .” (E ins tein)
85
• Neither time nor s pac e time began at the moment of the
lates t B ig B ang.
86
• “ 79T he L orentz trans formation of a s pheric ally-s ymmetric
proper elec tric field E of a moving elec tric c harge from the
c harge’s referenc e frame to the referenc e frame of a non-
moving obs erver res ults in the following term whic h we c an
define or label as ‘magnetic field’ mus t inc orporate
WIP P /Wave theory.
DA V ID R IC HA R D S A NNE S
DA IR Y F A R ME R
87