Arena District Community Revitalization Levy Recommendation: That Administration apply to the Minister of Municipal Affairs for the designation of an Arena District. The incremental increase in tax revenue for the Arena District over a 20 year period is projected to be sufficient to repay a $160 million initial investment (with interest)
Arena District Community Revitalization Levy Recommendation: That Administration apply to the Minister of Municipal Affairs for the designation of an Arena District. The incremental increase in tax revenue for the Arena District over a 20 year period is projected to be sufficient to repay a $160 million initial investment (with interest)
Arena District Community Revitalization Levy Recommendation: That Administration apply to the Minister of Municipal Affairs for the designation of an Arena District. The incremental increase in tax revenue for the Arena District over a 20 year period is projected to be sufficient to repay a $160 million initial investment (with interest)
Arena District legislation further enables municipalities 5 to apply both the municipal and the Community education portion of incremental tax Revitalization Levy increases directly towards the costs incurred. The funding is not an additional tax, but rather a redirection of Recommendation: the incremental increase in the amount of taxes that are collected as a result of That Administration apply to the Minister increasing the tax base in the area. The of Municipal Affairs for the designation of incremental increase in tax revenue for a Community Revitalization Levy Area the Arena District over a 20 year period for the Arena District, as outlined in is projected to be sufficient to repay a Attachment 1 of the April 6, 2011, Asset $160 million initial investment (with Management and Public Works interest). Department report 2011PW1372.
Report Summary To date, one Community Revitalization
Levy has been implemented within the This report provides an overview of Province – that being for the City of the Community Revitalization Calgary Rivers District. In Edmonton, process; it’s applicability as a Community Revitalization Levy funding mechanism for the Regulations for the Belvedere (Fort development of an Arena Project, and Road) and The Quarters Downtown requests authorization to make Projects have been approved and the application to the Province to Community Revitalization Levy Plans designate an area as an Arena are in preparation. Discussions with District. representatives from the Provincial Previous Council/Committee Action Government have been positive towards the possible application for a At the January 17, 2011, City Council Community Revitalization Levy for the meeting, the following motion was Arena District. passed: That Administration, in regards to the A number of administrative processes Potential Downtown Arena are required to fulfil the Provincial Development: provide a report to the requirements for this program, including: March 2, 2011, City Council meeting • Application to the Minister of on an Arena District Community Municipal Affairs to establish the Revitalization Levy. boundary, parameters, and framework for the Community Report Revitalization Levy (the The Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. Regulation). 2000, c. M-26 (MGA) was amended in • Adoption by City Council of a 2005 to allow a municipality to apply Community Revitalization Levy incremental tax assessment growth Plan by Bylaw (including public towards paying for the construction of a meetings and Hearings). If the project intended to revitalize an area. Province passes a Community
ROUTING - City Council | DELEGATION – L. Rosen/M. Hall
WRITTEN BY – R. Daviss | April 6, 2011 – Finance and Treasury Department 2011PW1372 Page 1 of 4 Arena District Community Revitalization Levy
Revitalization Levy Regulation for Revitalization Levy Regulations. The
the area and City Council results of the public consultation for the supports this initiative, then a Community Revitalization Levy is to be bylaw and a Community provided to the Minister for Revitalization Levy Plan could be consideration prior to approval by the brought forward for consideration Province. in late 2011 or early 2012. • The Lieutenant Governor in Other Considerations: Council must approve the Community Revitalization Levy The City’s Chief Economist indicates Plan and Bylaw (which then that Edmonton’s economy, employment comes into effect as of December and population will all continue to grow 31 of the year the bylaw is at rates comparable to or better than the approved by City Council). national average out to 2020. While it can be expected that this growth will be Arena District Community Revitalization uneven it none the less will be Levy Boundary: significant. Hence there will be demand for additional housing, incremental retail A Preliminary boundary has been space as consumer spending rises and prepared, providing a logical new commercial space to accommodate geographical area which is likely to be more workers as employment rises and most impacted by the construction of a the economy continues to shift toward new downtown arena (Attachment 1). the production of services. The establishment of the boundary was based upon the proximity to the arena, While growth of the local economy is the existing land use, relationship to positive, the success of a Community existing statutory plans and the potential Revitalization Levy is contingent upon for redevelopment. The finalization of localized growth within the boundaries the proposed boundary is still open to of the Community Revitalization Levy amendments as deemed appropriate. that are likely to commence or be accelerated as a result of the arena Public Consultation: development going forward.
Opinions and comments relative to Preliminary modelling of the growth in
using the Community Revitalization tax base in the vicinity of the arena Levy as a funding mechanism for the projects an incremental assessment lift Arena Project have been obtained over the next 20 years sufficient to through the open houses and surveys. enable repayment of an initial capital investment of $160 million. More Over and above the public consultation precise modelling will be carried out process established for the Arena upon Council’s concurrence with a Project, the Community Revitalization boundary and updated projections will Levy legislation requires a formal public be provided prior to Council’s hearing. This will take place after the consideration of the proposed Minister has provided an Order in Community Revitalization Levy Council approving the Community Regulation (expected in May 2011).
Page 2 of 4 Arena District Community Revitalization Levy
construction costs until the new
The risk of using a Community development generates the tax lift. Revitalization Levy to fund a municipal capital project is that future development The preliminary model identified and growth above the assessment shortages in the revenue required to pay baseline within a particular site cannot the mortgage payments on $160 million be guaranteed. The City can influence until year ten. However, the model private sector growth and development projects that all of the revenue required through the use of catalyst projects like would be received within the 20-year a downtown arena and other public period. At the end of the Community infrastructure, but it is not something the Revitalization Levy period, City can control. approximately $30 million in annual municipal tax revenue would be The boundary proposed for the Arena available for other purposes. District Community Revitalization Levy includes sites and projects that have Impact on Other Plans been approved or are in the planning phase but have not commenced for A concern has been raised relative to various reasons. The development of the impact that a new Arena District an arena is projected to serve as a Community Revitalization Levy may catalyst for some of these projects to have upon the viability of the The commence and others to be initiated. Quarters Downtown Community Previous reports to Council have sited Revitalization Levy. The concern is numerous examples of other cities whether there is sufficient growth where the development of a sports and projected to enable both Community entertainment facility served as a Revitalization Levy’s to be successful. catalyst for downtown development. While both of these Community Revitalization Levy’s are dependent While climbing vacancy rates for the upon investment in commercial and downtown (9.5 percent) and decreasing residential investment to be viable, each rental rates may not be conducive to area has distinct and unique aspects new office tower construction at this which focus on different markets. In time, vacancy rates are expected to particular, proximity to the River Valley decline in response to Edmonton’s and associated views will maintain ongoing steady growth forecast. interest in multi-family development in The Quarters Downtown, while the The revenues that can be realized Arena development is expected to be an through a Community Revitalization attraction for commercial development Levy will not materialize until the (office, hotel, and retail). adjacent development begins to generate increases above the Of note is the inclusion of the assessment baseline. There would be a warehouse district as identified within requirement for financing from an the Capital City Downtown Area interim funding source. An increased Redevelopment Plan. By including this facility improvement fee may be an within the Arena District Community option to consider to fund the Revitalization Levy boundary, the
Page 3 of 4 Arena District Community Revitalization Levy
Adminstration can consider accessing time frame. Council would need to
Community Revitalization Levy funding determine their risk tolerance for for municipal projects over and above going forward under these the arena development. Opportunities circumstances. to access Arena District Community Revitalization Levy funding for municipal Justification of Recommendation capital projects within the Community The Provincial Government has enacted Revitalization Levy boundary (other than legislation to assist municipalities in arena construction) would be brought revitalization proposals such as the forward for Council’s consideration as Arena District. Review of the legislation part of the Community Revitalization and discussions with representatives Levy Plan prior to submission to the from the Provincial Government indicate Province. that the Arena Development Project Corporate Outcomes would be appropriate for this program. • Improve Edmonton’s Livability • Transform Edmonton’s Urban Form Attachments Budget/Financial Implications 1. Arena District Community Revitalization Levy Boundary Plan • The advantage to utilization of a Community Revitalization Levy to Others Reviewing this Report fund a portion of the public • R. G. Klassen, General Manager, infrastructure required for the Planning and Development revitalization of the Arena District Department area is the application of the education property tax to this purpose. The preliminary model estimates that $36 million of the $160 million expected would be funded through the education portion of the property tax lift for the area. • While the application of a Community Revitalization Levy is projected to fund 25 to 35 percent of an arena project, there is a requirement for initial capital outlay for construction in advance of when the Community Revitalization Levy would be sufficient to repay the loan. This would require interim funding to be identified. There is also risk that the project will not generate the assessment lift that has been estimated in time to generate the required amount within the 20-year