You are on page 1of 4

6.

The Community Revitalization Levy


Arena District legislation further enables municipalities 5
to apply both the municipal and the
Community education portion of incremental tax
Revitalization Levy increases directly towards the costs
incurred. The funding is not an
additional tax, but rather a redirection of
Recommendation: the incremental increase in the amount
of taxes that are collected as a result of
That Administration apply to the Minister
increasing the tax base in the area. The
of Municipal Affairs for the designation of
incremental increase in tax revenue for
a Community Revitalization Levy Area
the Arena District over a 20 year period
for the Arena District, as outlined in
is projected to be sufficient to repay a
Attachment 1 of the April 6, 2011, Asset
$160 million initial investment (with
Management and Public Works
interest).
Department report 2011PW1372.

Report Summary To date, one Community Revitalization


Levy has been implemented within the
This report provides an overview of Province – that being for the City of
the Community Revitalization Calgary Rivers District. In Edmonton,
process; it’s applicability as a Community Revitalization Levy
funding mechanism for the Regulations for the Belvedere (Fort
development of an Arena Project, and Road) and The Quarters Downtown
requests authorization to make Projects have been approved and the
application to the Province to Community Revitalization Levy Plans
designate an area as an Arena are in preparation. Discussions with
District. representatives from the Provincial
Previous Council/Committee Action Government have been positive towards
the possible application for a
At the January 17, 2011, City Council Community Revitalization Levy for the
meeting, the following motion was Arena District.
passed:
That Administration, in regards to the A number of administrative processes
Potential Downtown Arena are required to fulfil the Provincial
Development: provide a report to the requirements for this program, including:
March 2, 2011, City Council meeting • Application to the Minister of
on an Arena District Community Municipal Affairs to establish the
Revitalization Levy. boundary, parameters, and
framework for the Community
Report Revitalization Levy (the
The Municipal Government Act, R.S.A. Regulation).
2000, c. M-26 (MGA) was amended in • Adoption by City Council of a
2005 to allow a municipality to apply Community Revitalization Levy
incremental tax assessment growth Plan by Bylaw (including public
towards paying for the construction of a meetings and Hearings). If the
project intended to revitalize an area. Province passes a Community

ROUTING - City Council | DELEGATION – L. Rosen/M. Hall


WRITTEN BY – R. Daviss | April 6, 2011 – Finance and Treasury Department 2011PW1372
Page 1 of 4
Arena District Community Revitalization Levy

Revitalization Levy Regulation for Revitalization Levy Regulations. The


the area and City Council results of the public consultation for the
supports this initiative, then a Community Revitalization Levy is to be
bylaw and a Community provided to the Minister for
Revitalization Levy Plan could be consideration prior to approval by the
brought forward for consideration Province.
in late 2011 or early 2012.
• The Lieutenant Governor in Other Considerations:
Council must approve the
Community Revitalization Levy The City’s Chief Economist indicates
Plan and Bylaw (which then that Edmonton’s economy, employment
comes into effect as of December and population will all continue to grow
31 of the year the bylaw is at rates comparable to or better than the
approved by City Council). national average out to 2020. While it
can be expected that this growth will be
Arena District Community Revitalization uneven it none the less will be
Levy Boundary: significant. Hence there will be demand
for additional housing, incremental retail
A Preliminary boundary has been space as consumer spending rises and
prepared, providing a logical new commercial space to accommodate
geographical area which is likely to be more workers as employment rises and
most impacted by the construction of a the economy continues to shift toward
new downtown arena (Attachment 1). the production of services.
The establishment of the boundary was
based upon the proximity to the arena, While growth of the local economy is
the existing land use, relationship to positive, the success of a Community
existing statutory plans and the potential Revitalization Levy is contingent upon
for redevelopment. The finalization of localized growth within the boundaries
the proposed boundary is still open to of the Community Revitalization Levy
amendments as deemed appropriate. that are likely to commence or be
accelerated as a result of the arena
Public Consultation: development going forward.

Opinions and comments relative to Preliminary modelling of the growth in


using the Community Revitalization tax base in the vicinity of the arena
Levy as a funding mechanism for the projects an incremental assessment lift
Arena Project have been obtained over the next 20 years sufficient to
through the open houses and surveys. enable repayment of an initial capital
investment of $160 million. More
Over and above the public consultation precise modelling will be carried out
process established for the Arena upon Council’s concurrence with a
Project, the Community Revitalization boundary and updated projections will
Levy legislation requires a formal public be provided prior to Council’s
hearing. This will take place after the consideration of the proposed
Minister has provided an Order in Community Revitalization Levy
Council approving the Community Regulation (expected in May 2011).

Page 2 of 4
Arena District Community Revitalization Levy

construction costs until the new


The risk of using a Community development generates the tax lift.
Revitalization Levy to fund a municipal
capital project is that future development The preliminary model identified
and growth above the assessment shortages in the revenue required to pay
baseline within a particular site cannot the mortgage payments on $160 million
be guaranteed. The City can influence until year ten. However, the model
private sector growth and development projects that all of the revenue required
through the use of catalyst projects like would be received within the 20-year
a downtown arena and other public period. At the end of the Community
infrastructure, but it is not something the Revitalization Levy period,
City can control. approximately $30 million in annual
municipal tax revenue would be
The boundary proposed for the Arena available for other purposes.
District Community Revitalization Levy
includes sites and projects that have Impact on Other Plans
been approved or are in the planning
phase but have not commenced for A concern has been raised relative to
various reasons. The development of the impact that a new Arena District
an arena is projected to serve as a Community Revitalization Levy may
catalyst for some of these projects to have upon the viability of the The
commence and others to be initiated. Quarters Downtown Community
Previous reports to Council have sited Revitalization Levy. The concern is
numerous examples of other cities whether there is sufficient growth
where the development of a sports and projected to enable both Community
entertainment facility served as a Revitalization Levy’s to be successful.
catalyst for downtown development. While both of these Community
Revitalization Levy’s are dependent
While climbing vacancy rates for the upon investment in commercial and
downtown (9.5 percent) and decreasing residential investment to be viable, each
rental rates may not be conducive to area has distinct and unique aspects
new office tower construction at this which focus on different markets. In
time, vacancy rates are expected to particular, proximity to the River Valley
decline in response to Edmonton’s and associated views will maintain
ongoing steady growth forecast. interest in multi-family development in
The Quarters Downtown, while the
The revenues that can be realized Arena development is expected to be an
through a Community Revitalization attraction for commercial development
Levy will not materialize until the (office, hotel, and retail).
adjacent development begins to
generate increases above the Of note is the inclusion of the
assessment baseline. There would be a warehouse district as identified within
requirement for financing from an the Capital City Downtown Area
interim funding source. An increased Redevelopment Plan. By including this
facility improvement fee may be an within the Arena District Community
option to consider to fund the Revitalization Levy boundary, the

Page 3 of 4
Arena District Community Revitalization Levy

Adminstration can consider accessing time frame. Council would need to


Community Revitalization Levy funding determine their risk tolerance for
for municipal projects over and above going forward under these
the arena development. Opportunities circumstances.
to access Arena District Community
Revitalization Levy funding for municipal Justification of Recommendation
capital projects within the Community
The Provincial Government has enacted
Revitalization Levy boundary (other than
legislation to assist municipalities in
arena construction) would be brought
revitalization proposals such as the
forward for Council’s consideration as
Arena District. Review of the legislation
part of the Community Revitalization
and discussions with representatives
Levy Plan prior to submission to the
from the Provincial Government indicate
Province.
that the Arena Development Project
Corporate Outcomes would be appropriate for this program.
• Improve Edmonton’s Livability
• Transform Edmonton’s Urban Form Attachments
Budget/Financial Implications 1. Arena District Community
Revitalization Levy Boundary Plan
• The advantage to utilization of a
Community Revitalization Levy to Others Reviewing this Report
fund a portion of the public • R. G. Klassen, General Manager,
infrastructure required for the Planning and Development
revitalization of the Arena District Department
area is the application of the
education property tax to this
purpose. The preliminary model
estimates that $36 million of the
$160 million expected would be
funded through the education portion
of the property tax lift for the area.
• While the application of a
Community Revitalization Levy is
projected to fund 25 to 35 percent of
an arena project, there is a
requirement for initial capital outlay
for construction in advance of when
the Community Revitalization Levy
would be sufficient to repay the loan.
This would require interim funding to
be identified. There is also risk that
the project will not generate the
assessment lift that has been
estimated in time to generate the
required amount within the 20-year

Page 4 of 4

You might also like