You are on page 1of 5

Concept of Happiness 1

Concept of Happiness

Roanne Marie Gacusan

Course
Concept of Happiness 2

Introduction

Being happy is hard to achieve. Many concepts of happiness have been made to guide

people to be happy or to give people a grasp of happiness. One would be Aristotle’s concept of

eudaimonia(happiness) in his Nicomachean ethics. He argues that happiness depends on activity

and the activities based on virtue. Another concept would be the modern concept of happiness

where happiness is a “state or mood of the consciousness” and is not based on activities.

(Eagleton,146) The position of this paper will be with Aristotle’s concept of happiness.

Happiness is achieved through activity and do not just come to people and become a mood.

There is always an external thing that affects the mood of people that is why, even if

happiness is just a mood, it is also affected by activities. This paper will be comparing the two

concepts of happiness.

Aristotle’s Concept of Happiness

In general, Aristotle’s concept of happiness circles around activities. The concept of

selection, the activities based on the best virtue, and collection, the collection of all activities is a

problem in Aristotle’s concept.(Pakaluk, 316) An argument of Aristotle also discusses that

happiness is achieved from activities of virtue. This is the main idea of his concept of happiness.

This means that happiness is only achieved if an individual accomplished his or her activities,

according to his or her standards. The standards come along with virtue.

It can be seen that happiness is achieved by way of life. This is what Aristotle proposes.

The problem here is that, once the standards are broken, or became inappropriate in a time or

place, the happiness stops. For example, if an individual’s standard of activities is appropriate for

a democratic country, once the country enters war, it will not be appropriate anymore. This will

stop the happiness of the individual.


Concept of Happiness 3

The Modern Concept of Happiness

This concept suggests that happiness is just a mood of the conscious mind. It is not based

on the way of life a man follows. Here, happiness is something that one believes to exist in his or

her mind. If a man believes he is happy, then he is happy. Also, the modern concept of happiness

dejects the fact that happiness is based on activities. This is because, if happiness was to be based

on something, then if that thing is taken away, then happiness will also be gone. For example, if

an athlete, who really loves being an athlete, becomes paralyzed, then he would not be happy.

And he can only gain happiness from self-contentment where he should believe that all is well.

Therefore, this type of happiness is only based on what one believes.

Happiness, as a state of the consciousness, means that it can be easily taken away. Many

external things affect the emotions of individuals. If a man has an officemate that spills his

coffee every day, even if they were just accidents, he will be angry. Here, if one believes that he

is happy, then the cause of his happiness will be his belief. But because there are many other

external things that can cause a change of emotion, then happiness is not permanent.

Comparison between the Two

In the Aristotle’s concept, happiness will be based on activities. While in the modern

concept, happiness is based on beliefs. This shows that the modern concept has more

weaknesses. A belief can easily be swayed by some external thing. While for Aristotle’s concept,

one can only stop in being happy if he or she dies. For example, even if someone becomes

paralyzed, he or she can still think. Thinking is the base of all activities. Without thinking, no

one can even establish a standard for activities. And once the standards are established,

everything else becomes easier. Happiness is longer and easier to achieve when it is based on the

way of life.
Concept of Happiness 4

For the modern concept, it’s weak because many things can affect the mood of a person.

The base is so unstable that it can easily be swayed. There are so many external factors that

affect the life of individuals. These factors are then processed in the mind according to the biases

of the mind. And after that, the product can be an action and an emotion. Different factors brings

different results. Then if one only believes that he is happy, if something against his bias comes

across, then his happiness will be gone.

This makes Aristotle’s concept of happiness to be more powerful. Even perfect

happiness, if it exists, can be achieved as what Michael Pakaluk claims in the book Aristotle's

Nicomachean ethics: an introduction.

Conclusion

Both concepts of happiness can be used if the other is not possible. This is just to stay

happy. Being happy brings all other kinds of positive things to one’s life. An example would be,

if a man is happy, he sees things in the positive side. Being happy also helps people become

emotionally stable. The only question is how can people be happy? In this case, Aristotle’s

concept of happiness is more powerful. It does not only give happiness but can also give people a

grasp of perfect happiness.


Concept of Happiness 5

Works Cited

Eagleton, T. The Meaning of Life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Pakaluk, M. Aristotle's Nicomachean ethics: an introduction. New York: Cambridge University

Press, 2005.

You might also like