Professional Documents
Culture Documents
As a planning team we appreciate the opportunity to serve the Austin Independent School District.
DeJONG-RICHTER LLC
Magellan Consulting
Cuningham Group
BLGY Architecture
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
Additional Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 32
Policy Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 32
Management Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 33
Staffing Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 33
Energy Efficiency Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 34
Maintenance Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 34
Design Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 35
Safety and Security Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 35
Use Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Technology Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 36
Other Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 37
Appendices
Appendix A ........................................................................................................................ FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts
Appendix B...................................................................................................................................................Facility Capacity Charts
Appendix C .........................................................................................................................................Visioning Workshop Summary
Appendix D .................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F ............................................................................................................................... Community Meeting #3 Comments
Appendix G ............................................................................................................. Summary of Facility Options Discussed by FMPTF
Appendix H.................................................................................................................................................................... Glossary of Terms
Page 2
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Acknowledgements
We would like to extend our appreciation to the Austin Independent School District Board of Trustees for its commitment
to the Facility Master Planning Process. We realize that the recommendations contained within the plan will create
challenges for the community in the months and years to come. With the support of the school district and community
members, the Austin Independent School District can continue its mission to provide a comprehensive educational
experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society.
Board of Trustees
Mark Williams, District 5, President
Vincent M. Torres, District 4, Vice President
Lori Moya, District 6, Secretary
Cheryl Bradley, District 1
Sam Guzman, District 2
Christine Brister, District 3
Robert Schneider, District 7
Annette LoVoi, At-Large Position 8
Tamala Barksdale, At-Large Position 9
Page 3
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 4
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Introduction
Facility Master Plan Vision Statement
All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement and support common community goals through
equitable, inviting facilities that integrate technology and are optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and
meet highest educational adequacy standards.
The Austin Independent School District is committed to The facility master planning process is a proactive
providing high quality and challenging educational approach to explore long- and short-term academic
experiences for all students who are enrolled in its and facility options and solutions. Among the most
schools. To ensure this commitment, the District important components contributing to the success of the
developed the AISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. As part of plan is the involvement and input gathered from Austin
Strategy #4 of that plan, key steps 4.5 and 4.7 included community members.
development of a long-range facility master plan as
follows. The recommendations contained within will serve as the
basis from which Austin Independent School District
Strategy #4 – align resources to accomplish priorities facilities will be transformed into a new generation of
within a balanced budget schools that accommodates educational needs today
and in the future. The final Austin Independent School
4.5 Develop and implement long-range plans for District Facility Master Plan will serve as a road map that
facilities, transportation, libraries and technology will address facility conditions, an implementation
that align infrastructure with the district’s timeframe, and project costs.
educational plan
Page 5
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Executive Summary
Page 6
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
southeastern part of the District, and a new high school The Facility Master Plan Task Force held 25 meetings over
site in the southern region of the District. The construction the course of 10 months and hosted 11 community
of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a meetings. In addition, the Task Force Co-chairs attended
part of a future bond program. ten meetings at various school campuses throughout the
District. The community meetings provided invaluable
As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that input to the Task Force throughout the process. Results
three new elementary schools and additions at seven and comments from these meetings are available in the
elementary schools and one middle school would be appendix of this report.
required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization
rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or Challenges
additions. During the process, the Task Force was faced with
several challenges and complex issues associated with
Process AISD facilities and planning for the future. The following
In April of 2010, a Facility Master Plan Task Force was outline is meant to provide an understanding and
created and an educational planning firm was hired by reflection of the real issues with which the Task Force has
AISD in order to develop the District-wide Facility Master been struggling, and the resulting implications for facility
Plan. The Task Force, comprised of parents, community master planning.
members, teachers, principals, and AISD staff was
charged with the following tasks. Challenge #1: Accomplishing priorities within a shrinking
budget
Monitor the process to ensure equity and fairness
across the District In order for AISD to continue operating as it is today, an
Review and confirm recommendations and assessed budget shortfall between $94 and $100 million
resolve conflicting recommendations for fiscal year 2012 will have to be addressed. Can
Prepare information and host community increasing facility efficiency decrease the budget
dialogues and meetings shortfall, and how can this be balanced with the future
Review and analyze data of neighborhood schools, their design, size, and
Review and analyze community input sustainability?
Develop and recommend an Educational
Framework to the Board of Trustees Challenge #2: Student migration
Develop facility options to improve efficiency and
address student needs The number of students previously living within the Austin
Develop and recommend the district-wide Facility urban core, has declined over the past 20 years, resulting
Master Plan to the Board of Trustees in 25% of schools housing less than 85% of their
permanent student capacities. Conversely, there have
Page 7
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
been large population increases in the outer areas of the Challenge #4: Boundary adjustment solutions
District, resulting in 50% of schools housing more than
105% of their permanent student capacities. A logical solution to improve efficiencies among
overcrowded and under-utilized schools is to adjust the
However, not all under- and over-utilization is a direct attendance boundaries and assign more or fewer
result of population and demographic shifts. Large students as appropriate. In practice, it is not that simple.
numbers of students that travel outside of the boundary In some cases, under-utilization occurs when a large
of their assigned school present a challenge when number of students migrate to schools outside of their
making future facility decisions. Should long-term geographical attendance zone. Increasing the size of
planning address the number of students living within the the boundary of the under-utilized school will not fix the
attendance area, or should it address the number of problem. In addition, if the aforementioned migrating
students currently attending that school, including students decided to attend their home schools, the result
transfer students? What are the principles of the current could be an overcrowded scenario.
transfer policies and how will they be applied in the
future? In other cases, there are too many overcrowded or
under-enrolled schools adjacent to each other. This
Challenge #3: The role of facility planning in supporting results in a “domino effect” of moving students from one
and complementing educational program planning location to the other in order to increase or decrease
enrollment. In many instances, students would not be
AISD strives to maintain academic standards, programs, able to attend the school closest to their homes or in their
and performance consistently throughout the District. neighborhoods. In fact, they may have to drive past a
From a facilities perspective, what recommendations school closer to their home in order to attend another
can be made to help move the District toward school to achieve balanced enrollment.
increasing graduation rates and eliminating the
achievement gap? Since programs are capable of Challenge #5: Balancing short- and long-term needs
changing faster than bricks and mortar, how can
facilities remain flexible and be retrofitted for multi-use Significant resources will be needed to address the
where practical? How can facility decisions positively capital projects outlined in this facility plan. In addition
impact student achievement? For example, is it more to the funds needed to renovate AISD’s facility inventory,
beneficial to offer duplicate programs, such as fine arts additional investment in deferred maintenance and
or career technology education, or is it better to provide small capital projects will continue as buildings age. At
transportation to a single program? What are the cost the same time, new schools will need to be constructed
implications? to accommodate growth.
Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Test_
Page 9
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 10
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that elementary schools and under-utilization in middle
two additional elementary schools would be required. schools.
Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a d. Explore Pre-K Centers to address overcrowding
precipitant for potential new construction or additions. e. Conduct intensive planning for School for Young
The unfunded new construction recommendations Men (site TBD based on community input,
include the following: feasibility, and availability of funding).
1. Three new elementary schools f. Conduct planning for district open-enrollment
2. Seven elementary school classroom additions signature programs and vertical team signature
3. One new middle school programs, and their equitable geographic
4. One middle school classroom addition distribution.
5. One new high school g. Complete analysis of changes to district programs
that generate facility needs.
IV. Closures/Consolidations
h. Conduct planning for Career Tech Hubs (sites TBD
based on community input, feasibility, and
Although the Task Force’s recommendations include the
availability of funding).
consideration of school closures because of the severity
of the District’s budget short fall, significant concerns i. Consider options for separating some elementary
were expressed by some members of the Task Force schools into Pre-K-3 and 4-8 grade configurations
regarding the impact of school closures on communities, to address overcrowding.
especially in those where recent gains in student
performance could be jeopardized. VI. Policy
a. Consider consolidating/closing one middle school. a. Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most
b. Consider consolidating/closing eight elementary critically overcrowded regions where possible.
schools. b. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012 to
V. Programs Recommendations balance enrollment and improve vertical
alignment.
a. Relocate Alternative Learning Center (ALC) c. Address strict application of transfer policy as it
possibly in a different quadrant of the city . applies to overcrowding and under-utilization.
b. Identify a Pre-K-8 school (begin Pre-K-5) to relieve
VII. Operating Efficiency and Potential Revenue
north central overcrowding. Also, consider this
model in other areas of the district.
a. Do not renew administrative leases that end in
c. Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to
FY’11.
middle school to relieve overcrowding in
Page 11
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 12
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Seriously consider Boundary review and Boundary review and Boundary review and
redrawing boundaries in redraw TBD redraw TBD redraw TBD
most critically overcrowded
regions where possible
Open classroom additions Open classroom additions at Open classroom addition at
at four elementary schools two elementary schools one middle school (requires
(requires future bond (requires bond future future bond funding, $4.8M)
funding, $4.8M each) funding, $4.8M each) Open classroom addition at
one elementary school
(requires future bond
funding, $4.8M)
Consider Consider
consolidating/closing one consolidating/closing four
middle school and four elementary schools
elementary schools
Preliminary planning for Proposed Bond Program Proposed Bond Program Proposed Bond Program
upcoming bond proposals Election (>$500M*) Election (TBD*) Election (TBD*)
(every 4 yrs.)
Open Linder Early Open Performing Arts Open new undesignated ES Open new undesignated ES Open new Southeast MS Open new South High
Childhood Center (2008 Center -recommended for North (requires future bond (requires future bond School (requires future bond
Bond funding available, (2008 Bond, funding Central (2008 Bond, funding funding, $24.5M) funding, $55.7M) funding, $106.6M)
$21.6M) available, $40M)_ __ available, $28.1M)__ _
Open North Central Open new undesignated ES
Elementary School (2004 (requires future bond
Bond funding available, funding, $24.5M)_________
$28.1M) Open new undesignated ES
(requires future bond
funding, $24.5M)
Relocate Alternative
Learning Center (consider
possibilities in different
quadrant of the city)
Identify pre-k-8 school Consider options for
(begin pre-k-5) to relieve separating some ES into Pk-
north central elementary 3rd and 4th – 8th to address
school overcrowding. Also, overcrowding__ _
consider this model in other Explore 3rd Pre-k center to
areas of the district. address overcrowding TBD
Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade
from elementary to middle from elementary to middle from elementary to middle from elementary to middle
school to relieve school to relieve school to relieve school to relieve
overcrowding and overcrowding and overcrowding and overcrowding and
underutilization underutilization underutilization underutilization
Analyze each school to Review application of
determine if limitations to transfer policy for efficacy
transfers/choice options are and fidelity
needed
Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000
In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000
*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved
by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees
Page 13
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2
renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional
equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements
(requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond
funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding)
Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction
Do not renew administrative Do not renew administrative
leases that finish in FY’11__ leases that finish in FY’14
Explore terminating
administrative leases that
finish in FY’14
Prepare and sell Baker
Prepare and sell CAC
Expand existing district Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to
energy efficiency programs, 95% of baseline 90% of baseline or lower 85% of baseline or lower 80% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 70% of baseline or lower 65% of baseline or lower
including coordinated
facilities summer shutdowns
where feasible___________
Identify additional energy
efficiency facility needs to
include in 2012 bond
package
Programs
Intensive planning for Open School for Young Men
School for Young Men (site (if feasible and funding
TBD based on community available)
input, feasibility, availability
of funding)
Planning for district open-
enrollment signature
programs, and vertical team
signature programs and
their equitable geographic
distribution_____________
Complete analysis of
changes to district programs
that generate facilities
needs
Planning for Career Tech Open Career Tech Hubs
Hubs (locations and funding (1 north, 1 south)
sources TBD)
Page 14
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Estimated Budget
The following tables provide an estimated budget, including estimated costs or savings by year, for the facility
recommendations. The estimated costs or savings are based on AISD budgeted operating costs and recently completed
facility evaluations.
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTAL
Page 15
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Area Facility Options Area 6: Central – Austin HS, Travis HS, Fulmore MS,
O.Henry MS, Barton Hills ES, Becker ES, Dawson ES,
The following pages describe, outline, and Linder ES, Travis Heights ES, Zilker ES
summarize facility options by area in the District. The
District has been divided into the 10 following with a Area 7: Southwest – Bowie HS, Bailey MS, Gorzycki
map provided on the following page. MS, Small MS, Baldwin ES, Baranoff ES, Clayton ES,
Kiker ES, Mills ES, Oak Hill ES, Patton ES
Area 1: Northwest – Anderson HS, Murchison MS,
Davis ES, Doss ES, Hill ES, Summitt ES Area 8: South – Crockett HS, Bedichek MS,
Covington MS, Boone ES, Cunningham ES, Galindo
Area 2: North Central – Lanier HS, Burnet MS, Dobie ES, Joslin ES, St. Elmo ES, Sunset Valley ES, The Ann
MS, Barrington ES, Cook ES, Graham ES, Hart ES, Richards School for Young Women Leaders
McBee ES, Pillow ES, Walnut Creek ES, Wooldridge
ES, Wooten ES, Read Pre-K Center Area 9: Southeast – Mendez MS, Blazier ES, Houston
ES, Langford ES, Palm ES, Perez ES, Rodriguez ES,
Area 3: Central West – McCallum HS, Lamar MS, Widen ES
Brentwood ES, Brown ES, Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES,
Gullet ES, Highland Park ES, Lee ES, Mathews ES, Area 10: Far South – Akins HS, Paredes MS, Casey ES,
Pease ES, Reilly ES, Ridgetop ES Cowan ES, Kocurek ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES,
Pleasant Hill ES, Williams ES
Area 4: Northeast – LASA HS, LBJ HS, Reagan HS,
Garcia MS, Pearce MS, Webb MS, Andrews ES,
Blanton ES, Harris ES, Jordan ES, Maplewood ES,
Overton ES, Pecan Springs ES, Pickle ES, Winn ES
Page 16
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 17
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 18
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 19
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 21
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 22
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 24
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 25
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Future Growth
Moderate population growth is projected in
this area, specifically within the Linder and AREA 7 – SOUTHWEST
Travis Heights attendance zones. Bowie High School
Facility Condition Bailey, Gorzycki and Small middle schools
With the exception of one elementary with a Baldwin, Baranoff, Clayton, Kiker, Mills, Oak Hill and
high FCI, on average, the facilities have an Patton elementary schools
FCI above the the district average (22.8), Area Issues
with three elementary schools and one Based on the number of students living in the area for
middle school requiring more extensive the 2010-11 school year:
renovations. The area has available seats at the middle school
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan level, and is slightly deficient at the elementary
Consolidate/close two elementary schools. and high schools levels.
Address priorities 1& 2 and functional equity The number of students migrating into the area is
improvements. higher than the number of students migrating out
Community Impact of the area at all levels.
Consult with the community regarding the Elementary School Capacity 5,392 Elementary Migration IN - 633
use closed/consolidated elementary Elementary School Population 5,727 Elementary Migration OUT - 545
school(s). Excess / (Deficient) Seats (335) Net Migration - 88
Cost Savings
• M&O savings for two elementary schools - Middle School Capacity 3,738 Middle School Migration IN - 487
$2.2M. Middle School Population 2,844 Middle School Migration OUT - 358
• Capital cost avoidance for three elementary Excess / (Deficient) Seats 894 Net Migration - 129
schools- $17.5M.
High School Capacity 2,535 High School Migration IN - 505
High School Population 2,606 High School Migration OUT - 231
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (71) Net Migration - 274
Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
Three elementary schools, Kiker, Mills and Patton,
are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
permanent capacity)
One elementary school, Baranoff, is over capacity
(between 105% and 115% of permanent
capacity).
Page 26
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Two elementary schools, Clayton and Oak Hill, are Future Growth
within the target range of percent of permanent Moderate population growth is projected in
capacity (between 85% and 105%) this area at the elementary and middle
One elementary school, Baldwin, is under enrolled school levels.
(below 85% of permanent capacity) Facility Condition
One middle school, Bailey, is within the target On average, the facilities have an FCI well
range of percent of permanent capacity below the District FCI (22.8%).
(between 85% and 105%). Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year
Two middle schools, Gorzycki and Small are under Plan
enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity) Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
One high school, Bowie, is over capacity elementary school.
(between 105% and 115% of permanent Adjust boundaries among elementary
capacity). schools.
Educational Enhancement Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
Academic Ratings: improvements.
Community Impact
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable No Rating
Baranoff ES Bailey MS None Baldwin ES
Consult with community regarding boundary
Clayton ES Bowie HS adjustments.
Kiker ES Gorzycki MS Cost Savings
Mills ES Small MS NA
Oak Hill ES
Patton ES
Page 27
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 28
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
Four elementary schools, Blazier, Houston, Perez
and Rodriguez, are severely overcrowded (over
125% of permanent capacity).
Two elementary schools, Langford and Widen, are
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
permanent capacity).
One elementary school, Palm, is within the target
range of percent of permanent capacity
(between 85% and 105%).
The middle school, Mendez, is under enrolled
(below 85% of permanent capacity).
There is no high school in this area.
Page 29
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 30
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 31
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Additional Recommendations
4. Conduct campus assessments for future bond
The Facilities Master Plan Task Force recommends the work in consultation with each school's Campus
following District-wide initiatives and policy Advisory Council to ensure accurate, first-hand
recommendations. Some recommendations may knowledge of campus conditions and priorities.
require additional planning and research from other AISD For continuity, each campus will maintain a
departments and outside entities. The Task Force does Facilities Improvement Plan documenting prior
not want to lose sight of these very important ideas and campus evaluations, including a Principal's Log,
recognizes that the Facility Master Plan is a dynamic in which the principal or his/her designee will
document and should be updated periodically to record relevant discussions regarding how the
incorporate building improvements, updates in campus facilities are functioning and note any
community demographics, and changes in educational concerns for future administrators and CACs.
programming.
5. When new schools or consolidations are being
I. Policy Recommendations considered, first evaluate existing District sites
(both presently undeveloped or in use) and
1. Consider school closures only after all other determine if any are candidates for new
alternatives and options, both programmatic and construction, renovation, or re-construction. This
facilities use, have been thoroughly examined may assist the District in locating schools in better
and discussed with the affected communities. locations than can be achieved with the
purchase of new land.
2. Create a community engagement process, led
by the Superintendent and the Senior Leadership 6. Continue to identify ways to improve
Team, to work directly with the local community collaborative planning with the City of Austin.
as part of the implementation planning process. The Austin ISD, City of Austin, and Travis County
have adopted a joint resolution that specifically
3. Establish a standing committee of parents, commits these entities to collaborative planning
teachers, district staff, and other stakeholders efforts including the AISD Facility Master Plan and
(e.g., City, Chamber of Commerce, realtors) to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
track and maintain the Facility Master Plan over
time. 7. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012 to
Page 32
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
12. Analyze current “out migration” trends from III. Staffing Recommendations
campus/zones to understand the underlying
issues, AND then address those issues in order to 16. Develop a plan to supervise custodians centrally
support the return of students to their to allow more flexibility in the use of resources,
neighborhood schools. reduce overtime costs through flexible
Page 33
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
scheduling, improved supervision and quality 22. Implement an educational campaign to raise or
control, and improved facility scheduling and lower thermostats in schools four degrees.
energy management. (Estimates based on examples project savings of
17. Consolidate maintenance functions, including between 5% and 20%.)
field maintenance for athletic fields, under the
Maintenance Department to provide more 23. Continue to upgrade and improve data and
efficient and flexible use of available resources. systems to measure utility usage by campus.
19. Continue the current District focus on energy 25. Include furniture and equipment replacement
usage reduction through more efficient schedule in the next bond program scope of
equipment, technology applications to manage work; invest in high quality equipment that will not
the operation of buildings more effectively, and require frequent maintenance or replacement.
engagement of campus and facility occupants
to assist working toward the goal of reduced 26. Institute industry-standard performance measures
usage. for bond programs, per the 2009 MGT Efficiency
Study, to maintain and publish the following types
20. Continue efforts toward a coordinated shutdown of data: cost per foot of construction projects
of facilities in the summer months as is feasible. compared to peer districts and regional and
national averages, final estimate compared to
21. As soon as feasible, fund energy coordinator final bid, change-order rate, completion
position to implement and monitor energy schedules, consultant ratings.
savings initiatives at campuses. Savings
generated from funding this position would more
than offset the cost.
Page 34
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 35
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
37. Ensure the installation of adequate public address communication and allow people in different
and alarm systems in all schools, including all spaces to be in the same space virtually. “Green”
portables. meetings reduce employee travel time and have
a smaller carbon footprint.
38. Address campus traffic issues as identified by the
campus. 44. Institute cloud computing with anytime/anywhere
access that works with all computer types and
VIII. Use Recommendations devices.
39. Increase building rental rates to increase cost- 45. Use Web 2.0 tools to communicate, collaborate,
recovery for community use of schools. and create.
40. Appropriately consolidate students in underutilized 46. Use tools such as video “chat” to expand beyond
campuses to make available as much classroom the classroom (i.e., virtual field trips, interactions
space as possible, and issue Requests for Proposals with other students from across town, or across the
to identify educational groups or childcare globe).
providers interested in leasing excess space and
assuming or sharing maintenance and operation 47. Create a single web entry point (portal) with single
costs. sign-on for all student and teacher resources in
one place.
41. Implement an aggressive marketing campaign to
rent the Burger Activity and Delco Activity centers 48. Increase use of online assessment tools to receive
to interested parties for conferences, athletic results more quickly and reduce paper usage, i.e.,
events, and other activities. dashboards.
Page 36
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
51. Increase use of mobile computing (including 53. Consider the feasibility of sharing administrative
personal devices such as smart phones) and staff or resources and services among small
mobile devices (netbooks). Fewer desktop campuses.
computers (use less energy, smaller foot print,), less
need for dedicated traditional computer lab. 54. Determine cost effectiveness of duplicating
special programs in different areas of the District
X. Other Recommendations versus providing transportation to a single
program.
52. Assess administrative fees for general, sibling, or
tracking school transfers, with no fee for students
qualified for free and reduced lunch, and with
provisions for hardship waivers.
Page 37
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school
type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.
School ID number, name, and address 2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population
Grades served 2010-11 In Migration
Permanent and portable/temporary square 2010-11 Out Migration
footage Site size and number of parking spaces
Number of classrooms Individual building data
Permanent Capacity Facility condition data
2010-11 Enrollment Deficiency costs by building system and priority
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population Facility master plan recommendations
Page 38
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 112,608 112,608
Area (GSF) per student 297 0 297
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 379
Utilization (by enrollment) 56% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 354 319
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 53%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 364 309 Perm Buildings 112,608 30.3%
2010-11 In Migration 057 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1957 100,939 30.3%
Building B 1 1958 10,577 35.3%
Site Data Mechanical 1 1957 1,092 27.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.5
Parking Spaces 72
142
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Allan ES
Page 39
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,426 7,680 69,106
Area (GSF) per student 113 14 127
Number of Classrooms 30 9 39
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 543
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 585 -99
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 120%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 590 -104 Perm Buildings 61,426 20.4%
2010-11 In Migration 031 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 079 Building A 1 1955 61,426 21.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 61
101
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Allison ES
Page 40
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,376 12,288 70,664
Area (GSF) per student 81 17 99
Number of Classrooms 31 16 47
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 717
Utilization (by enrollment) 147% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 692 -206
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 142%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -278 Perm Buildings 58,376 32.1%
2010-11 In Migration 061 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 075 Building A 1 1962 53,954 38.8%
Building B 1 1986 4,422 8.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.7
Parking Spaces 39
102
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Andrews ES
Page 41
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 86,751 86,751
Area (GSF) per student 171 0 171
Number of Classrooms 38 0 38
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 508
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 557 112
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 27 Perm Buildings 86,751 0.0%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 2 2010 86,751
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) .0
Parking Spaces
187
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baldwin ES
Page 42
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 80,088 6,144 86,232
Area (GSF) per student 91 7 98
Number of Classrooms 44 8 52
Permanent Capacity 794
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 876
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 891 -97
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 874 -80 Perm Buildings 80,088 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 081 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 093 Building A 1 1999 69,092 13.2%
Classroom 1 2008 10,996 5.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Parking Spaces 84
182
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baranoff ES
Page 43
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,971 21,504 100,475
Area (GSF) per student 79 22 101
Number of Classrooms 41 24 65
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 996
Utilization (by enrollment) 152% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 955 -301
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 146%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,098 -444 Perm Buildings 78,971 21.2%
2010-11 In Migration 084 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1969 50,792 39.6%
Building B 1 1999 15,285 4.9%
Site Data Building C 1 2010 100
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.1 Building D 1 2010 12,794 0.0%
Parking Spaces 68
149
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Barrington ES
Page 44
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 38,291 10,752 49,043
Area (GSF) per student 99 28 127
Number of Classrooms 14 13 27
Permanent Capacity 251
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 386
Utilization (by enrollment) 154% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 203 48
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 199 52 Perm Buildings 38,291 29.8%
2010-11 In Migration 172 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 021 Building A 1 1964 32,101 33.1%
Building B 1 1964 2,985 20.7%
Site Data Band 1 2007 3,205 0.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 43
103
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Barton Hills ES
Page 45
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,670 3,072 62,742
Area (GSF) per student 287 15 302
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 208
Utilization (by enrollment) 40% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 226 298
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 43%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 256 268 Perm Buildings 59,670 38.1%
2010-11 In Migration 069 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1936 56,835 39.2%
Mechanical 1 1939 499 26.9%
Site Data Building C 1 1936 1,237 21.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.7 Building D 1 1936 1,099 23.9%
Parking Spaces 0
104
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Becker ES
Page 46
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,726 70,726
Area (GSF) per student 290 0 290
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 244
Utilization (by enrollment) 41% Percent of Capacity
Excess/
Deficit Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 288 310
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 48%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 275 323 Perm Buildings 70,726 35.0%
2010-11 In Migration 021 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 058 Building A 1 1903 70,726 34.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.3
Parking Spaces 52
105
MƒAƒPƒPƒS ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
Blackshear ES
Page 47
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 71,817 10,752 82,569
Area (GSF) per student 122 18 140
Number of Classrooms 40 10 50
Permanent Capacity 636
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 630 6
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 99%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 799 -163 Perm Buildings 71,817 19.6%
2010-11 In Migration 078 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 157 Building A 1 1964 56,530 22.1%
Building B 1 1964 3,546 26.8%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 11,424 6.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.0 Greenhouse 1 2004 317 35.8%
Parking Spaces 75
106
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blanton ES
Page 48
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 82,897 10,752 93,649
Area (GSF) per student 107 14 121
Number of Classrooms 38 10 48
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 775
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 896 -298
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 150%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 993 -395 Perm Buildings 82,897 5.1%
2010-11 In Migration 049 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 168 Building A 1 2008 82,897 4.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.4
Parking Spaces 95
185
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blazier ES
Page 49
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 73,690 73,690
Area (GSF) per student 147 0 147
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Permanent Capacity 752
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 501
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 478 274
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 64%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 468 284 Perm Buildings 73,690 17.5%
2010-11 In Migration 130 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 106 Building A 1 1986 63,673 18.5%
Building B 1 1998 10,017 7.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.5
Parking Spaces 82
170
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Boone ES
Page 50
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 62,891 3,072 65,963
Area (GSF) per student 127 6 133
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Permanent Capacity 585
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 495
Utilization (by enrollment) 85% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 456 129
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 450 135 Perm Buildings 62,891 23.2%
2010-11 In Migration 149 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 110 Building A 1 1951 62,319 23.7%
Building B 1 1951 572
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.7
Parking Spaces 68
107
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brentwood ES
Page 51
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 52,282 3,858 56,140
Area (GSF) per student 119 9 128
Number of Classrooms 27 5 32
Permanent Capacity 430
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 439
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 441 -11
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 103%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 471 -41 Perm Buildings 52,282 24.9%
2010-11 In Migration 075 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 1 1954 52,282 25.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.9
Parking Spaces 43
108
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brooke ES
Page 52
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 53,853 9,216 63,069
Area (GSF) per student 104 18 122
Number of Classrooms 29 12 41
Permanent Capacity 468
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 519
Utilization (by enrollment) 111% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 525 -58
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 546 -79 Perm Buildings 53,853 28.1%
2010-11 In Migration 074 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 096 Building A 1 1957 53,853 32.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Parking Spaces 58
109
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brown ES
Page 53
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 37,517 9,216 46,733
Area (GSF) per student 93 23 116
Number of Classrooms 16 12 28
Permanent Capacity 272
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 404
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 312 -40
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 115%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 333 -61 Perm Buildings 37,517 33.4%
2010-11 In Migration 094 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 047 Building A 1 1939 30,990 42.3%
Building B 1 1999 4,874 10.9%
Site Data Multi-Use 1 1949 451 14.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3 Multi-Use 1 1949 1,202
Parking Spaces 33
110
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bryker Woods ES
Page 54
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,793 1,536 63,329
Area (GSF) per student 172 4 176
Number of Classrooms 33 2 35
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 360
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 367 157
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 70%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 379 145 Perm Buildings 61,793 20.8%
2010-11 In Migration 056 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 063 Building A 1 1992 61,793 20.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Parking Spaces 71
111
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Campbell ES
Page 55
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,506 1,536 83,042
Area (GSF) per student 122 2 124
Number of Classrooms 44 2 46
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 669
Utilization (by enrollment) 94% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 763 -52
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 107%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 768 -57 Perm Buildings 81,506 16.7%
2010-11 In Migration 083 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 171 Building A 1 1998 81,506 17.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Parking Spaces 90
173
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Casey ES
Page 56
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 77,911 13,824 91,735
Area (GSF) per student 94 17 111
Number of Classrooms 38 16 54
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 825
Utilization (by enrollment) 123% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 -62
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 109%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -95 Perm Buildings 77,911 17.4%
2010-11 In Migration 110 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 016 Building A 1 1951 77,710 17.8%
Storage 1 1977 201
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Parking Spaces 74
112
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Casis ES
Page 57
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 99,921 6,144 106,065
Area (GSF) per student 115 7 122
Number of Classrooms 47 8 55
Permanent Capacity 836
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 867
Utilization (by enrollment) 104% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 837 -1
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 100%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 905 -69 Perm Buildings 99,921 5.9%
2010-11 In Migration 087 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 048 Building A 1 2006 99,921 6.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.8
Parking Spaces 80
184
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Clayton ES
Page 58
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 67,344 18,432 85,776
Area (GSF) per student 75 20 95
Number of Classrooms 35 23 58
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Utilization (by enrollment) 161% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,252 -691
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 223%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,388 -827 Perm Buildings 67,344 27.5%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 379 Building A 1 1974 58,243 37.0%
Building B 1 1998 9,101 7.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.7
Parking Spaces 102
161
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cook ES
Page 59
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,234 9,216 79,450
Area (GSF) per student 90 12 101
Number of Classrooms 37 12 49
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 783
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 707 -38
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 704 -35 Perm Buildings 70,234 9.1%
2010-11 In Migration 196 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 121 Building A 1 1999 70,234 8.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 22.5
Parking Spaces 84
183
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cowan ES
Page 60
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 71,600 21,504 93,104
Area (GSF) per student 140 42 182
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 512
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 573 159
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 560 172 Perm Buildings 71,600 34.3%
2010-11 In Migration 116 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 174 Building A 1 1963 61,878 43.2%
Building B 1 1990 9,722 33.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.8
Parking Spaces 62
113
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cunningham ES
Page 61
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 72,149 4,608 76,757
Area (GSF) per student 106 7 112
Number of Classrooms 41 6 47
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 683
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 666 66
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 702 30 Perm Buildings 72,149 23.3%
2010-11 In Migration 047 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 035 Building A 1 1993 62,168 28.5%
Building B 1 1999 9,981 4.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 104
179
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Davis ES
Page 62
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 60,228 12,288 72,516
Area (GSF) per student 78 16 94
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Permanent Capacity 543
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 768
Utilization (by enrollment) 141% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 728 -185
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 134%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 747 -204 Perm Buildings 60,228 26.2%
2010-11 In Migration 071 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 024 Building A 1 1970 55,582 34.4%
Bldg B 1 2009 4,646 0.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Parking Spaces 73
154
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Doss ES
Page 63
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 55,301 5,394 60,695
Area (GSF) per student 167 16 183
Number of Classrooms 32 3 35
Permanent Capacity 505
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 331
Utilization (by enrollment) 66% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 276 229
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 55%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 282 223 Perm Buildings 55,301 27.2%
2010-11 In Migration 113 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 059 Building A 1 1954 45,037 28.2%
Building B 1 1986 299 3.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1991 9,965 10.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.7
Parking Spaces 56
114
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Dawson ES
Page 64
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 85,482 7,680 93,162
Area (GSF) per student 121 11 132
Number of Classrooms 44 10 54
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 704
Utilization (by enrollment) 99% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 689 22
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 705 6 Perm Buildings 85,482 11.4%
2010-11 In Migration 103 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 091 Building A 1 1989 84,582 10.0%
Mechanical 1 2001 900 91.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Parking Spaces 98
176
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Galindo ES
Page 65
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 77,638 77,638
Area (GSF) per student 187 0 187
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 415
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 452 146
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 76%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 89 Perm Buildings 77,638 30.9%
2010-11 In Migration 052 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 104 Building A 1 1940 77,137 30.5%
Building B 1 1940 501 172.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4
Parking Spaces 71
116
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Govalle ES
Page 66
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,589 10,752 81,341
Area (GSF) per student 93 14 107
Number of Classrooms 38 11 49
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 761
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 825 -227
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 138%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 850 -252 Perm Buildings 70,589 30.4%
2010-11 In Migration 049 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 114 Building A 1 1972 44,946 45.0%
Building B 1 1993 14,411 14.5%
Site Data Building C 1 2008 11,232 4.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 77
159
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Graham ES
Page 67
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 39,827 11,525 51,352
Area (GSF) per student 74 21 95
Number of Classrooms 24 14 38
Permanent Capacity 418
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 541
Utilization (by enrollment) 129% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 325 93
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 342 76 Perm Buildings 39,827 29.2%
2010-11 In Migration 247 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 030 Building A 1 1956 39,648 35.0%
Mechanical 1 1972 179 11.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Parking Spaces 30
117
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Gullett ES
Page 68
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 56,066 15,360 71,426
Area (GSF) per student 74 20 94
Number of Classrooms 34 16 50
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 758
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 755 -213
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 139%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 789 -247 Perm Buildings 56,066 21.5%
2010-11 In Migration 052 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 106 Building A 1 1955 41,954 32.2%
Building B 1 1998 14,112 11.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.3
Parking Spaces 33
118
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Harris ES
Page 69
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,042 13,824 94,866
Area (GSF) per student 90 15 106
Number of Classrooms 44 18 62
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 898
Utilization (by enrollment) 126% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 888 -177
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 982 -271 Perm Buildings 81,042 10.3%
2010-11 In Migration 101 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 088 Building A 1 1998 69,867 12.6%
Building B 1 2010 11,175 4.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.7
Parking Spaces 62
163
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Hart ES
Page 70
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,550 9,216 67,766
Area (GSF) per student 88 14 102
Number of Classrooms 33 12 45
Permanent Capacity 585
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 662
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 599 -14
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 648 -63 Perm Buildings 58,550 31.1%
2010-11 In Migration 116 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 054 Building A 1 1952 58,550 34.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3
Parking Spaces 60
119
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Highland Park ES
Page 71
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,626 9,216 78,842
Area (GSF) per student 95 13 108
Number of Classrooms 35 11 46
Permanent Capacity 627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 732
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 714 -87
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -107 Perm Buildings 69,626 26.8%
2010-11 In Migration 072 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 050 Building A 1 1970 62,010 32.1%
Building B 1 1990 7,616 17.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.9
Parking Spaces 74
155
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Hill ES
Page 72
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,360 15,360 96,720
Area (GSF) per student 89 17 105
Number of Classrooms 43 19 62
Permanent Capacity 692
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 917
Utilization (by enrollment) 133% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 897 -205
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 872 -180 Perm Buildings 81,360 36.5%
2010-11 In Migration 128 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 102 Building A 1 1976 55,814 54.5%
Building B 1 1991 8,863 32.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1991 5,303 25.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8 Building D 1 2006 11,380 10.8%
Parking Spaces 93
162
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Houston ES
Page 73
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 74,460 12,288 86,748
Area (GSF) per student 89 15 104
Number of Classrooms 41 16 57
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 833
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -52
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 108%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 707 -53 Perm Buildings 74,460 22.0%
2010-11 In Migration 200 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 075 Building A 1 1992 62,255 27.2%
Building B 1 2008 12,205 4.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Parking Spaces 114
178
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Jordan ES
Page 74
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,826 7,680 52,506
Area (GSF) per student 123 21 145
Number of Classrooms 24 9 33
Permanent Capacity 374
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 363
Utilization (by enrollment) 97% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 329 45
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 345 29 Perm Buildings 44,826 40.6%
2010-11 In Migration 089 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 056 Building A 1 1954 30,934 55.6%
Building B 1 1957 10,642 41.4%
Site Data Building C 1 1986 3,250 5.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.1
Parking Spaces 56
120
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Joslin ES
Page 75
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 76,332 15,360 91,692
Area (GSF) per student 82 16 98
Number of Classrooms 42 13 55
Permanent Capacity 752
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 933
Utilization (by enrollment) 124% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 883 -131
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 852 -100 Perm Buildings 76,332 16.4%
2010-11 In Migration 129 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 080 Building A 1 1992 63,549 21.1%
Building B 1 2007 12,783 4.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.4
Parking Spaces 90
180
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kiker ES
Page 76
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,528 1,536 80,064
Area (GSF) per student 119 2 121
Number of Classrooms 42 2 44
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 660
Utilization (by enrollment) 98% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 687 -14
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 698 -25 Perm Buildings 78,528 25.5%
2010-11 In Migration 106 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 1986 68,029 28.6%
Building B 1 1998 10,499 8.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.3
Parking Spaces 70
172
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kocurek ES
Page 77
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,250 16,896 95,146
Area (GSF) per student 94 20 114
Number of Classrooms 43 21 64
Permanent Capacity 692
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 834
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 895 -203
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 946 -254 Perm Buildings 78,250 33.6%
2010-11 In Migration 054 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 103 Building A 1 1980 57,666 51.7%
Building B 1 1996 8,753 16.9%
Site Data Building C 1 2010 11,831 3.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 83
168
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Langford ES
Page 78
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 46,265 768 47,033
Area (GSF) per student 108 2 110
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Permanent Capacity 418
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 428
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 308 110
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 325 93 Perm Buildings 46,265 41.1%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 025 Building A 1 1939 38,816 44.8%
Mechanical 1 1939 460 13.7%
Site Data Library 1 1998 5,679 8.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.8 Building D 1 1939 1,310 24.2%
Parking Spaces 35
121
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lee ES
Page 79
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,250 16,896 86,146
Area (GSF) per student 78 19 97
Number of Classrooms 34 22 56
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 892
Utilization (by enrollment) 164% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 956 -414
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 176%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -489 Perm Buildings 69,250 19.9%
2010-11 In Migration 062 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 132 Building A 1 1972 69,250 23.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.1
Parking Spaces 86
160
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Linder ES
Page 80
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 45,390 9,216 54,606
Area (GSF) per student 112 23 134
Number of Classrooms 20 12 32
Permanent Capacity 355
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 406
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 300 55
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 84%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 383 -28 Perm Buildings 45,390 37.4%
2010-11 In Migration 129 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 069 Building A 1 1951 44,818 41.9%
Storage 1 1952 572 6.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Parking Spaces 42
122
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Maplewood ES
Page 81
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 42,112 4,606 46,718
Area (GSF) per student 104 11 115
Number of Classrooms 23 6 29
Permanent Capacity 397
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 405
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 284 113
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 72%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 297 100 Perm Buildings 42,112 31.2%
2010-11 In Migration 106 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1916 41,573 34.8%
Building B 1 1948 391
Site Data Building C 1 1965 48
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.3 Building D 1 1996 100 3.6%
Parking Spaces 0
123
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mathews ES
Page 82
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,717 9,216 78,933
Area (GSF) per student 91 12 103
Number of Classrooms 36 12 48
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 765
Utilization (by enrollment) 132% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -451
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 178%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,083 -503 Perm Buildings 69,717 7.9%
2010-11 In Migration 030 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 301 Building A 1 1999 69,717 7.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.9
Parking Spaces 90
165
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
McBee ES
Page 83
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,978 10,752 70,730
Area (GSF) per student 87 16 103
Number of Classrooms 34 12 46
Permanent Capacity 606
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 686
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 685 -79
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 629 -23 Perm Buildings 59,978 36.9%
2010-11 In Migration 113 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1975 59,978 43.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Parking Spaces 83
147
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Menchaca ES
Page 84
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,905 3,072 64,977
Area (GSF) per student 124 6 130
Number of Classrooms 34 4 38
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 498
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 477 65
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 33 Perm Buildings 61,905 30.6%
2010-11 In Migration 088 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 064 Building A 1 1993 61,905 32.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Parking Spaces 45
124
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Metz ES
Page 85
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,368 12,288 93,656
Area (GSF) per student 88 13 101
Number of Classrooms 44 16 60
Permanent Capacity 794
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 928
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 831 -37
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 821 -27 Perm Buildings 81,368 12.7%
2010-11 In Migration 134 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1998 81,368 13.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 104
181
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mills ES
Page 86
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,519 1,536 60,055
Area (GSF) per student 176 5 180
Number of Classrooms 30 2 32
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 333
Utilization (by enrollment) 68% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 376 110
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 77%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 348 138 Perm Buildings 58,519 32.6%
2010-11 In Migration 024 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 073 Building A 1 1970 44,692 41.8%
Classroom 1 2007 13,827 4.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.2
Parking Spaces 74
150
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Norman ES
Page 87
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 47,102 6,144 53,246
Area (GSF) per student 172 22 194
Number of Classrooms 26 6 32
Permanent Capacity 411
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 274
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293 118
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 330 81 Perm Buildings 47,102 26.0%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 046 Building A 1 1958 43,131 28.1%
Building B 1 1984 3,971 15.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Parking Spaces 47
125
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Oak Springs ES
Page 88
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,009 13,824 74,833
Area (GSF) per student 93 21 114
Number of Classrooms 34 14 48
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -164
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 719 -177 Perm Buildings 61,009 19.2%
2010-11 In Migration 058 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 101 Building A 1 1970 61,009 21.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Parking Spaces 72
156
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Odom ES
Page 89
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 75,784 10,752 86,536
Area (GSF) per student 98 14 112
Number of Classrooms 43 14 57
Permanent Capacity 773
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 772
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 820 -47
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 918 -145 Perm Buildings 75,784 33.6%
2010-11 In Migration 057 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1974 59,574 43.2%
Building B 1 1984 16,210 20.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.7
Parking Spaces 97
148
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Oak Hill ES
Page 90
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 47,302 3,072 50,374
Area (GSF) per student 160 10 170
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Permanent Capacity 374
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 266 108
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 269 105 Perm Buildings 47,302 40.0%
2010-11 In Migration 053 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 023 Building A 1 1959 19,106 51.8%
Building B 1 1966 20,907 33.7%
Site Data Building C 1 1959 5,146 62.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.4 Administration 1 1968 2,143 4.7%
Parking Spaces 36
126
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ortega ES
Page 91
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 91,163 12,288 103,451
Area (GSF) per student 136 18 155
Number of Classrooms 39 15 54
Permanent Capacity 617
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 668
Utilization (by enrollment) 108% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 948 -331
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 154%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 972 -355 Perm Buildings 91,163 4.7%
2010-11 In Migration 044 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 217 Building A 1 2007 91,163 4.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 70.4
Parking Spaces 175
189
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Overton ES
Page 92
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,082 3,072 82,154
Area (GSF) per student 130 5 136
Number of Classrooms 42 4 46
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 606
Utilization (by enrollment) 90% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 637 36
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 95%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 667 6 Perm Buildings 79,082 11.1%
2010-11 In Migration 050 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 1 1987 68,119 10.9%
Building B 1 2005 10,963 7.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 90
171
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Palm ES
Page 93
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 76,687 10,752 87,439
Area (GSF) per student 84 12 96
Number of Classrooms 43 13 56
Permanent Capacity 773
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 914
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 908 -135
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 966 -193 Perm Buildings 76,687 18.1%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 095 Building A 1 1986 76,687 19.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 24.1
Parking Spaces 109
143
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Patton ES
Page 94
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 35,624 35,624
Area (GSF) per student 139 0 139
Number of Classrooms 17 0 17
Permanent Capacity 293
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 256
Utilization (by enrollment) 87% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 293 Perm Buildings 35,624 75.8%
2010-11 In Migration 220 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1876 30,754 82.3%
Building B 1 1998 4,870 17.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.8
Parking Spaces 45
128
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pease ES
Page 95
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 56,992 9,216 66,208
Area (GSF) per student 107 17 124
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 532
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 490 -4
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 501 -15 Perm Buildings 56,992 37.2%
2010-11 In Migration 077 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 068 Building A 1 1957 46,209 44.0%
Building B 1 1990 10,783 26.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.6
Parking Spaces 63
129
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pecan Springs ES
Page 96
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 82,223 15,360 97,583
Area (GSF) per student 93 17 110
Number of Classrooms 37 19 56
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 886
Utilization (by enrollment) 148% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 945 -347
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 158%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 980 -382 Perm Buildings 82,223 9.0%
2010-11 In Migration 066 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 123 Building A 1 2006 82,223 10.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.0
Parking Spaces 106
190
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Perez ES
Page 97
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 120,862 6,144 127,006
Area (GSF) per student 163 8 172
Number of Classrooms 39 8 47
Permanent Capacity 617
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 740
Utilization (by enrollment) 120% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 737 -120
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 119%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 802 -185 Perm Buildings 120,862 5.7%
2010-11 In Migration 056 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 058 Building A 1 2001 120,862 5.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.5
Parking Spaces 132
164
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pickle ES
Page 98
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 54,247 10,752 64,999
Area (GSF) per student 83 16 100
Number of Classrooms 29 14 43
Permanent Capacity 523
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 653
Utilization (by enrollment) 125% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 651 -129
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -212 Perm Buildings 54,247 42.9%
2010-11 In Migration 095 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 090 Building A 1 1969 54,247 52.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Parking Spaces 53
151
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pillow ES
Page 99
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 65,729 7,680 73,409
Area (GSF) per student 106 12 119
Number of Classrooms 33 10 43
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 619
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 631 -107
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 121%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 680 -156 Perm Buildings 65,729 19.6%
2010-11 In Migration 087 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 099 Building A 1 1985 65,729 21.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Parking Spaces 71
130
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pleasant Hill ES
Page 100
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 64,644 9,216 73,860
Area (GSF) per student 127 18 145
Number of Classrooms 23 7 30
Permanent Capacity 393
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 509
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 393
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 393 Perm Buildings 64,644 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 510 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1961 61,575 11.3%
Building B 1 1961 3,069 6.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 98
131
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lucy Read Pre-K
Page 101
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 41,646 6,144 47,790
Area (GSF) per student 141 21 161
Number of Classrooms 20 8 28
Permanent Capacity 318
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 357 -39
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 366 -48 Perm Buildings 41,646 28.5%
2010-11 In Migration 045 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 100 Building A 1 1954 41,646 32.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Parking Spaces 45
132
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Reilly ES
Page 102
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 35,585 4,608 40,193
Area (GSF) per student 162 21 184
Number of Classrooms 13 6 19
Permanent Capacity 206
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 219
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 128 78
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 62%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 131 75 Perm Buildings 35,585 31.4%
2010-11 In Migration 147 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 056 Building A 1 1939 35,185 32.0%
Building B 1 1939 400 8.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.0
Parking Spaces 32
133
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ridgetop ES
Page 103
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,918 16,932 96,850
Area (GSF) per student 88 19 106
Number of Classrooms 44 22 66
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 910
Utilization (by enrollment) 128% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,045 -334
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 147%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,062 -351 Perm Buildings 79,918 8.0%
2010-11 In Migration 079 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 202 Building A 1 1999 69,914 7.7%
Classroom 1 2006 10,004 8.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.0
Parking Spaces 114
174
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Rodriguez ES
Page 104
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,131 6,144 84,275
Area (GSF) per student 134 11 144
Number of Classrooms 36 8 44
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 585
Utilization (by enrollment) 101% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 584 -4
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 644 -64 Perm Buildings 78,131 26.5%
2010-11 In Migration 074 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 061 Building A 1 1976 78,131 28.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.2
Parking Spaces 70
127
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sanchez ES
Page 105
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 48,212 3,072 51,284
Area (GSF) per student 159 10 169
Number of Classrooms 26 4 30
Permanent Capacity 411
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 304
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 369 42
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 90%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 361 50 Perm Buildings 48,212 41.2%
2010-11 In Migration 029 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 094 Building A 1 1960 48,212 40.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.4
Parking Spaces 60
136
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
St. Elmo ES
Page 106
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,337 6,144 50,481
Area (GSF) per student 160 22 182
Number of Classrooms 22 8 30
Permanent Capacity 355
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 277
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 343 12
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 359 -4 Perm Buildings 44,337 39.4%
2010-11 In Migration 016 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 084 Building A 1 1956 12,434 55.6%
Building B 1 1961 17,056 35.3%
Site Data Building C 1 1956 2,482 36.3%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4 Building D 1 1956 4,570 57.8%
Parking Spaces 66 Building E 1 1956 7,503 32.4%
Building F 1 1956 292 81.0%
139
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sims ES
Page 107
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 75,902 10,752 86,654
Area (GSF) per student 89 13 101
Number of Classrooms 41 14 55
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 854
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 623 109
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 662 70 Perm Buildings 75,902 25.2%
2010-11 In Migration 288 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 057 Building A 1 1986 65,936 28.9%
Building B 1 1989 9,966 24.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.5
Parking Spaces 107
138
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Summitt ES
Page 108
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 66,467 3,072 69,539
Area (GSF) per student 147 7 154
Number of Classrooms 35 2 37
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 451
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 483 78
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 86%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 543 18 Perm Buildings 66,467 42.3%
2010-11 In Migration 099 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 135 Building A 1 1971 57,298 50.9%
Building B 1 1996 9,169 11.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.4
Parking Spaces 86
158
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sunset Valley ES
Page 109
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,589 4,608 64,197
Area (GSF) per student 111 9 120
Number of Classrooms 31 6 37
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 537
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 548 -62
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 605 -119 Perm Buildings 59,589 36.6%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1938 40,576 39.7%
Building B 1 1985 4,992 35.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1994 14,021 20.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.2
Parking Spaces 44
140
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Travis Heights ES
Page 110
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,536 16,896 96,432
Area (GSF) per student 87 18 105
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 916
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 936 -282
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 143%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,002 -348 Perm Buildings 79,536 15.3%
2010-11 In Migration 060 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 094 Building A 1 1961 45,037 27.3%
Building B 1 1999 34,499 5.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Parking Spaces 94
141
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Walnut Creek ES
Page 111
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 74,523 15,360 89,883
Area (GSF) per student 97 20 117
Number of Classrooms 42 20 62
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 769
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 794 -121
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 118%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 780 -107 Perm Buildings 74,523 12.9%
2010-11 In Migration 077 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1986 63,666 15.5%
Building B 1 1989 10,857 7.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 92
175
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Widen ES
Page 112
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 64,846 9,216 74,062
Area (GSF) per student 101 14 115
Number of Classrooms 35 12 47
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 642
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 640 -79
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 621 -60 Perm Buildings 64,846 36.9%
2010-11 In Migration 130 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 133 Building A 1 1976 64,846 40.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.0
Parking Spaces 107
166
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Williams ES
Page 113
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 62,087 4,608 66,695
Area (GSF) per student 134 10 144
Number of Classrooms 33 6 39
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 463
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 485 39
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 93%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 531 -7 Perm Buildings 62,087 22.5%
2010-11 In Migration 044 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 082 Building A 1 1970 52,117 21.7%
Building B 1 1990 9,970 21.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Parking Spaces 66
157
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Winn ES
Page 114
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 68,543 19,968 88,511
Area (GSF) per student 78 23 101
Number of Classrooms 33 26 59
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 878
Utilization (by enrollment) 168% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,160 -636
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 222%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,255 -731 Perm Buildings 68,543 23.0%
2010-11 In Migration 061 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 342 Building A 1 1969 58,805 32.1%
Building B 1 1998 9,738 13.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.6
Parking Spaces 60
152
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Wooldridge ES
Page 115
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 53,689 18,432 72,121
Area (GSF) per student 77 27 104
Number of Classrooms 29 22 51
Permanent Capacity 468
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 695
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 672 -205
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 144%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 737 -270 Perm Buildings 53,689 51.2%
2010-11 In Migration 125 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 093 Building A 1 1955 53,689 63.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.7
Parking Spaces 37
144
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Wooten ES
Page 116
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,333 69,333
Area (GSF) per student 170 0 170
Number of Classrooms 36 0 36
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 407
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 347 233
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 60%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 353 227 Perm Buildings 69,333 32.8%
2010-11 In Migration 082 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 043 Building A 1 1937 69,333 32.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.4
Parking Spaces 12
145
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Zavala ES
Page 117
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 50,941 10,752 61,693
Area (GSF) per student 98 21 118
Number of Classrooms 26 14 40
Permanent Capacity 460
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 522
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 338 122
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 358 102 Perm Buildings 50,941 56.4%
2010-11 In Migration 204 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 018 Building A 1 1950 42,029 69.2%
Gymnasium 1 1961 2,827 49.5%
Site Data Library 1 1990 5,488 24.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.8 Vocational 1 1950 597 53.3%
Parking Spaces 54
146
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Zilker ES
Page 118
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 148,143 10,752 158,895
Area (GSF) per student 142 10 153
Number of Classrooms 56 11 67
Permanent Capacity 1,176
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,041
Utilization (by enrollment) 89% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 979 197
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,048 128 Perm Buildings 148,143 16.4%
2010-11 In Migration 196 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 129 Building A 1 1993 148,143 15.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Parking Spaces 138
059
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bailey MS
Page 119
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 130,600 27,018 157,618
Area (GSF) per student 124 26 150
Number of Classrooms 48 31 79
Permanent Capacity 941
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,054
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,219 -278
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,340 -399 Perm Buildings 130,600 30.6%
2010-11 In Migration 100 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 248 Building A 1 1972 91,844 32.0%
Gymnasium 1 1972 28,847 55.2%
Site Data Building C 1 1997 9,909 5.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.3
Parking Spaces 140
054
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bedichek MS
Page 120
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 137,768 18,432 156,200
Area (GSF) per student 138 18 157
Number of Classrooms 53 22 75
Permanent Capacity 1,039
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 998
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,170 -131
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,365 -326 Perm Buildings 137,768 34.5%
2010-11 In Migration 060 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 203 Building A 1 1961 136,743 37.5%
Mechanical 1 1969 1,025 0.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.7
Parking Spaces 50
046
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Burnet MS
Page 121
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 173,636 4,608 178,244
Area (GSF) per student 216 6 221
Number of Classrooms 63 5 68
Permanent Capacity 1,323
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 805
Utilization (by enrollment) 61% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 905 418
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 984 339 Perm Buildings 173,636 18.7%
2010-11 In Migration 181 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 260 Building A 1 1986 134,657 18.9%
Auditorium 1 1986 20,672 20.3%
Site Data Vocational 1 1986 18,307 18.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 21.3
Parking Spaces 122
057
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Covington MS
Page 122
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 134,563 6,144 140,707
Area (GSF) per student 214 10 223
Number of Classrooms 46 8 54
Permanent Capacity 902
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 630
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 719 183
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 80%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 828 74 Perm Buildings 134,563 15.2%
2010-11 In Migration 063 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 130 Building A 1 1973 123,999 14.0%
Building B 1 2006 10,564 8.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.2
Parking Spaces 120
055
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Dobie MS
Page 123
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 159,699 7,680 167,379
Area (GSF) per student 161 8 168
Number of Classrooms 55 9 64
Permanent Capacity 1,078
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 995
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 850 228
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 79%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 990 88 Perm Buildings 159,699 40.6%
2010-11 In Migration 295 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 138 Building A 1 1911 72,664 46.9%
Cafeteria 1 1980 55,143 40.8%
Site Data Vocational 1 1980 18,500 56.1%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.8 Building D 1 2002 13,392 8.0%
Parking Spaces 85
043
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Fulmore MS
Page 124
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 160,764 160,764
Area (GSF) per student 244 0 244
Number of Classrooms 62 0 62
Permanent Capacity 1,215
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Utilization (by enrollment) 54% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 829 386
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 901 314 Perm Buildings 160,764 4.7%
2010-11 In Migration 027 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 2008 160,764 4.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Parking Spaces 160
056
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Garcia MS
Page 125
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 175,543 175,543
Area (GSF) per student 182 0 182
Number of Classrooms 63 0 63
Permanent Capacity 1,323
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 963
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 989 334
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 75%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,071 252 Perm Buildings 175,543 4.6%
2010-11 In Migration 108 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 132 Building A 1 2009 175,543 4.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Parking Spaces 160
062
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Gorzycki MS
Page 126
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 192,181 192,181
Area (GSF) per student 156 0 156
Number of Classrooms 80 0 80
Permanent Capacity 1,568
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,233
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 541 1,027
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 35%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 614 954 Perm Buildings 192,181 18.6%
2010-11 In Migration 806 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 064 Building A 1 1986 101,579 20.4%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1986 55,783 24.8%
Site Data Building C 1 2007 34,819 3.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 160
044
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kealing MS
Page 127
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 121,371 4,608 125,979
Area (GSF) per student 201 8 209
Number of Classrooms 48 4 52
Permanent Capacity 1,008
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 604
Utilization (by enrollment) 60% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 583 425
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 58%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 366 Perm Buildings 121,371 19.3%
2010-11 In Migration 223 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 191 Building A 1 1955 104,981 20.2%
Band 1 2000 9,032 6.0%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 5,354 8.3%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.3 Mechanical 1 2000 2,004 0.1%
Parking Spaces 106
045
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lamar MS
Page 128
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 107,983 10,752 118,735
Area (GSF) per student 169 17 186
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Permanent Capacity 804
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 639
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,056 -252
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 131%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,184 -380 Perm Buildings 107,983 28.8%
2010-11 In Migration 075 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 429 Building A 1 1966 55,290 36.4%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1966 52,693 26.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 94
051
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Martin MS
Page 129
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 173,382 13,824 187,206
Area (GSF) per student 195 16 210
Number of Classrooms 62 18 80
Permanent Capacity 1,215
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 890
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,266 -51
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 104%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,373 -158 Perm Buildings 173,382 15.0%
2010-11 In Migration 027 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 396 Building A 1 1987 135,158 13.4%
Auditorium 1 1987 20,672 15.0%
Site Data Vocational 1 1987 17,552 20.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.7
Parking Spaces 139
058
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mendez MS
Page 130
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 123,348 16,256 139,604
Area (GSF) per student 96 13 109
Number of Classrooms 53 20 73
Permanent Capacity 1,113
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,281
Utilization (by enrollment) 115% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,171 -58
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,301 -188 Perm Buildings 123,348 19.9%
2010-11 In Migration 220 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 110 Building A 1 1967 105,457 25.8%
Building B 1 1998 16,628 6.1%
Site Data Storage 1 1987 367
Gross Site Area (Acres) 26.2 Greenhouse 1 1979 896 11.5%
Parking Spaces 124
052
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Murchison MS
Page 131
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 124,320 6,144 130,464
Area (GSF) per student 121 6 127
Number of Classrooms 45 8 53
Permanent Capacity 945
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,026
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 804 141
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 897 48 Perm Buildings 124,320 13.3%
2010-11 In Migration 485 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 183 Building A 1 1953 124,320 12.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8
Parking Spaces 103
047
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
O. Henry MS
Page 132
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 148,695 6,144 154,839
Area (GSF) per student 160 7 166
Number of Classrooms 59 8 67
Permanent Capacity 1,156
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 930
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,165 -9
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,293 -137 Perm Buildings 148,695 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 069 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 291 Building A 1 2000 79,374 10.5%
Administration 1 2000 6,002 8.6%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 4,035 29.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 78.2 Cafeteria 1 2000 15,854 4.6%
Parking Spaces 108 Band 1 2000 9,072 9.4%
Gymnasium 1 2000 34,358 5.4%
061
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Paredes MS
Page 133
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 132,596 1,536 134,132
Area (GSF) per student 403 5 408
Number of Classrooms 55 1 56
Permanent Capacity 1,078
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 329
Utilization (by enrollment) 31% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 712 366
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 66%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 846 232 Perm Buildings 132,596 15.0%
2010-11 In Migration 328 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 510 Building A 1 1958 123,959 15.7%
Auditorium 1 1958 8,637 4.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.8
Parking Spaces 82
048
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pearce MS
Page 134
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 130,240 7,424 137,664
Area (GSF) per student 247 14 261
Number of Classrooms 44 6 50
Permanent Capacity 924
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 528
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 924
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 924 Perm Buildings 130,240 34.3%
2010-11 In Migration 526 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1958 118,655 39.9%
Mechanical 1 1958 1,114 3.4%
Site Data Band 1 1998 3,471 12.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.3 Building D 1 2010 7,000 4.9%
Parking Spaces 90
028
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ann Richards School
Page 135
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 160,599 4,608 165,207
Area (GSF) per student 167 5 172
Number of Classrooms 59 4 63
Permanent Capacity 1,239
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 959
Utilization (by enrollment) 77% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 876 363
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,008 231 Perm Buildings 160,599 6.9%
2010-11 In Migration 183 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 097 Building A 1 1999 160,599 7.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 36.5
Parking Spaces 108
060
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Small MS
Page 136
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 120,987 9,216 130,203
Area (GSF) per student 205 16 220
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Permanent Capacity 804
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 73
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 866 -62 Perm Buildings 120,987 19.8%
2010-11 In Migration 047 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 1961 110,133 21.1%
Building B 1 2008 10,854 0.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Parking Spaces 93
053
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Webb MS
Page 137
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 324,950 31,616 356,566
Area (GSF) per student 119 12 131
Number of Classrooms 114 38 152
Permanent Capacity 2,394
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,720
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 3,092 -698
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 3,305 -911 Perm Buildings 324,950 6.6%
2010-11 In Migration 176 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 596 Building A 1 2000 194,425 8.3%
Theatre 1 2000 39,881 4.3%
Site Data Gymnasium 1 2000 48,566 2.1%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 57.7 Cafeteria 1 2000 21,733 1.3%
Parking Spaces 659 Greenhouse 1 2004 3,079 3.3%
Classroom 1 2008 17,266 5.5%
017
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Akins HS
Page 138
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 309,329 1,536 310,865
Area (GSF) per student 148 1 149
Number of Classrooms 113 1 114
Permanent Capacity 2,373
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,089
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,962 411
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,147 226 Perm Buildings 309,329 27.6%
2010-11 In Migration 391 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 257 Building A 1 1973 171,233 24.2%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1973 121,018 36.1%
Site Data Library 1 2000 17,078 2.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 38.8
Parking Spaces 760
009
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Anderson HS
Page 139
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 307,089 7,680 314,769
Area (GSF) per student 131 3 135
Number of Classrooms 105 8 113
Permanent Capacity 2,205
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,337
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,958 247
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 89%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,146 59 Perm Buildings 307,089 31.1%
2010-11 In Migration 789 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 449 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1975 283,518 33.1%
Theatre 1 2000 23,571 3.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 44.3
Parking Spaces 544
002
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Austin HS
Page 140
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 417,702 19,968 437,670
Area (GSF) per student 145 7 152
Number of Classrooms 142 25 167
Permanent Capacity 2,982
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,876
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 2,606 376
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,715 267 Perm Buildings 417,702 31.4%
2010-11 In Migration 505 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 231 Administration 1 1988 14,688 16.4%
Building B 1 1988 261,135 24.8%
Site Data Greenhouse 1 1988 634 16.2%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 66.0 Greenhouse 1 1988 913 11.4%
Parking Spaces 678 Vocational 1 1988 27,588 51.6%
Mechanical 1 1988 5,462 49.0%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1988 107,282 19.2%
013
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bowie HS
Page 141
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 335,087 10,752 345,839
Area (GSF) per student 199 6 205
Number of Classrooms 103 13 116
Permanent Capacity 2,163
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,686
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,883 280
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,026 137 Perm Buildings 335,087 31.2%
2010-11 In Migration 285 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 510 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1969 322,158 30.3%
Theatre 1 1988 12,929 50.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 39.5
Parking Spaces 666
008
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Crockett HS
Page 142
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
1012 Arthur Stiles Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Te 78721 0 NR No
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 267,140 2,976 270,116
Area (GSF) per student 299 3 302
Number of Classrooms 79 2 81
Permanent Capacity 1,548
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 894
Utilization (by enrollment) 58% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,249 299
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,354 194 Perm Buildings 267,140 27.0%
2010-11 In Migration 125 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 955 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1960 205,285 32.6%
Theatre 1 1986 10,851 35.4%
Site Data Classroom 1 1986 24,940 7.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 27.6 Mechanical 1 1998 248
Parking Spaces 228 Green Tech 1 1998 25,816 1.6%
019
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC)
Page 143
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,754 9,480 54,234
Area (GSF) per student 172 36 209
Number of Classrooms 18 8 26
Permanent Capacity 378
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 260
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 378
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 378 Perm Buildings 44,754 21.5%
2010-11 In Migration 251 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1939 32,530 21.1%
Building B 1 1965 11,435 11.5%
Site Data Mechanical 1 1939 493 183.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.1 Building D 1 1939 48
Parking Spaces 36 Building E 1 1939 248
015
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Garza Independence HS
Page 144
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 291,406 13,824 305,230
Area (GSF) per student 155 7 162
Number of Classrooms 94 17 111
Permanent Capacity 1,842
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,881
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,083 759
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 59%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,155 687 Perm Buildings 291,406 14.4%
2010-11 In Migration 167 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 239 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1974 275,266 14.9%
Theatre 1 2006 16,140 9.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.4
Parking Spaces 598
014
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Johnson (LBJ) HS
Page 145
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 262,640 19,978 282,618
Area (GSF) per student 162 12 174
Number of Classrooms 83 26 109
Permanent Capacity 1,627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,624
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,981 -354
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 122%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,242 -615 Perm Buildings 262,640 22.1%
2010-11 In Migration 121 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 557 Building A 1 1966 134,966 28.4%
Theatre 1 1988 16,226
Site Data Gymnasium 1 1966 49,133 19.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.5 Vocational 1 1988 17,918 28.8%
Parking Spaces 329 Mechanical 1 1966 4,680 82.8%
Greenhouse 1 1966 922 17.5%
Greenhouse 1 1968 922 17.5%
Greenhouse 1 1968 600 16.8%
Vocational 1 1966 23,968 8.5%
Classroom 1 2009 8,605 6.2%
Storage 1 2008 300
Storage 1 2008 4,000 0.0%
Storage 1 2008 280
Storage 1 2008 120
004
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lanier HS
Page 146
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
004
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lanier HS
Page 147
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 242,667 16,896 259,563
Area (GSF) per student 133 9 142
Number of Classrooms 76 22 98
Permanent Capacity 1,596
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,824
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,316 280
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 82%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,434 162 Perm Buildings 242,667 20.4%
2010-11 In Migration 795 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 296 Building A 1 1953 184,032 25.1%
Mechanical 1 1953 2,364 11.1%
Site Data Theatre 1 1987 28,997 10.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.1 Gymnasium 1 1987 18,939 15.3%
Parking Spaces 301 Mechanical 1 1953 1,139
Storage 1 1993 3,732 0.0%
Storage 1 1978 464
Building H 1 2010 3,000 5.1%
005
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
McCallum HS
Page 148
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 249,609 3,072 252,681
Area (GSF) per student 277 3 280
Number of Classrooms 81 1 82
Permanent Capacity 1,588
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,552 36
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 98%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,769 -181 Perm Buildings 249,609 22.2%
2010-11 In Migration 080 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 779 Administration 1 1965 5,851 19.2%
Building B 1 1965 60,797 22.2%
Site Data Gymnasium 1 1965 47,562 16.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.8 Band 1 1965 2,982 10.0%
Parking Spaces 447 Vocational 1 1965 17,949 15.9%
Mechanical 1 1965 4,549 8.7%
Building G 1 1965 24,939 14.4%
Classroom 1 1967 42,718 10.7%
Vocational 1 1987 42,262 25.2%
006
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Reagan HS
Page 149
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 285,098 9,696 294,794
Area (GSF) per student 201 7 208
Number of Classrooms 95 10 105
Permanent Capacity 1,862
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,420
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,902 -40
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,087 -225 Perm Buildings 285,098 30.3%
2010-11 In Migration 147 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 677 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1953 224,722 32.4%
Gymnasium 1 1953 47,962 23.1%
Site Data Vocational 1 1975 8,049 29.2%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 34.8 Mechanical 1 1971 492 23.1%
Parking Spaces 451 Mechanical 1 1953 2,273 34.8%
Mechanical 1 1975 1,600 32.9%
007
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Travis HS
Page 150
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 39,039 1,536 40,575
Area (GSF) per student #Error n/a n/a
Number of Classrooms 12 1 13
Permanent Capacity 209
2010-11 Campus Enrollment n/a
Utilization (by enrollment) n/a Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 209
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 209 Perm Buildings 39,039 40.8%
2010-11 In Migration Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration Building A 1 1977 35,199 41.0%
Building B 1 1977 3,840 2.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.8
Parking Spaces 71
852
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Clifton Center
Page 151
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 88,677 9,216 97,893
Area (GSF) per student 657 68 725
Number of Classrooms 22 6 28
Permanent Capacity 462
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 135
Utilization (by enrollment) 29% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 462
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 462 Perm Buildings 88,677 34.4%
2010-11 In Migration 139 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1953 84,309 36.6%
Building B 1 1970 1,167 24.2%
Site Data Building C 1 1968 3,201 49.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Parking Spaces 120
012
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ridgeview ALC
Page 152
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report
School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 37,112 7,680 44,792
Area (GSF) per student 228 47 275
Number of Classrooms 18 5 23
Permanent Capacity 314
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 163
Utilization (by enrollment) 52% Percent of Capacity
Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 314
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 314 Perm Buildings 37,112 32.5%
2010-11 In Migration 158 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1939 35,994 33.4%
Building B 1 1939 460 8.8%
Site Data Building C 1 1940 658 15.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.9
Parking Spaces 43
251
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ60DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Rosedale
Page 153
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 154
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 155
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Past Use: Carruth was retail space prior to conversion to AISD administration
Page 156
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 157
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 158
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 159
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 160
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 161
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 162
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 163
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan
Page 164
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Educational Framework
The following Educational Framework was used as a i. Campus layout and organization
planning tool to aid in decision making by the Facility j. Neighborhood accessibility
Master Plan Task Force. It was not a mandate, but a set k. Feeder pattern impact
of guidelines, and was intended to be flexible in order to 4) School Performance - The Board may
align resources that will provide optimal learning consider a campus intervention, including
environments for all AISD students. The guiding principle closure or repurposing, for schools that have
for teaching and learning, as set by the Board of Trustees, not met academic criteria established by
is performance-based empowerment and earned the District, state or federal accountability
autonomy. systems.
5) Facility Utilization
1. Planning Guidelines a. Facility condition
A. Priorities for Decision Making and Optimal b. Capacity
Learning Environments c. Enrollment
d. Economic efficiency
1) Safety and Security e. Intensity of use
2) Equitable Learning Opportunities for All
Students - Ensure that all facilities offer
Alternative Learning Education programs
and are in full compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
3) Quality Facility Conditions
a. Physical condition and safety
b. Support for academic programs
c. Indoor-air quality – e.g. proper
ventilation, monitoring of indoor pollutants
d. Natural lighting
e. Environmental condition
f. Green Building concepts – e.g. energy,
water and materials efficiency
g. Application of current and emerging
technology – e.g. wireless networks
h. Site acreage
Page 165
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 166
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
C. Student Assignment – When developing facility provided by the District [e.g. International
options, student assignment would optimally be Baccalaureate, Global Studies, Early College
based on the following: High School, Early College Start, etc.].
Page 167
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 168
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Enrollment Projections
Page 169
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 170
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Elementary Schools
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Allan E S 464 494 492 470 441 436 426 446 398 389 392 379
Allison E S 480 485 480 452 467 486 484 509 500 520 520 543
Andrews E S 654 652 601 609 581 586 586 615 611 630 573 717
Baldwin E S 508
Baranoff E S 647 698 777 759 812 782 822 771 788 849 856 876
Barrington E S 660 670 655 703 693 778 746 752 821 866 929 996
Barton Hills E S 402 362 330 319 343 339 354 360 360 374 375 386
Becker E S 307 281 250 257 253 256 265 232 215 214 194 208
Blackshear E S 449 417 378 317 357 309 326 277 272 264 239 244
Blanton E S 824 701 635 668 622 619 608 563 564 547 555 591
Blazier E S - - - - - - - - 445 596 720 775
Boone E S 728 673 627 587 559 561 575 553 538 568 502 501
Brentwood E S 503 468 436 414 405 389 367 413 433 447 476 495
Brooke E S 412 374 360 291 281 337 372 352 344 410 423 439
Brown E S 606 651 534 589 548 550 508 517 508 519 506 519
Bryker Woods E S 394 422 403 369 371 376 397 427 395 401 398 404
Campbell E S 655 646 638 550 498 428 414 400 350 378 396 360
Casey E S 565 641 768 858 959 937 955 914 754 665 663 669
Casis E S 725 667 626 647 681 677 700 743 780 831 818 825
Clayton E S - - - - - - - 599 811 996 974 867
Cook E S 1,022 719 713 791 823 903 953 811 845 892 906 901
Cowan E S - 393 457 458 500 512 529 557 649 707 741 783
Cunningham E S 638 581 613 634 611 581 609 544 538 536 550 512
Davis E S 638 618 588 587 644 631 673 671 619 623 694 683
Dawson E S 464 447 469 415 420 381 362 371 362 335 335 331
Doss E S 666 667 652 659 669 623 627 645 659 677 719 768
Galindo E S 749 759 730 715 771 771 790 740 744 727 717 704
Govalle E S 630 562 459 480 438 440 416 391 383 419 394 415
Graham E S 619 586 573 666 633 713 676 698 678 633 658 761
Gullett E S 455 440 423 432 466 457 460 447 464 481 537 541
Harris E S 970 931 647 587 589 612 684 716 689 694 740 758
Hart E S 652 641 599 613 662 749 923 891 803 835 849 898
Highland Park E S 559 536 529 506 501 493 518 530 557 601 632 662
Hill E S 772 683 703 701 737 737 740 730 665 701 689 732
Houston E S 915 814 839 850 863 872 897 942 923 936 949 917
Jordan E S 725 763 800 696 629 624 622 690 619 743 814 833
Joslin E S 401 383 394 413 400 377 346 355 350 332 326 363
Kiker E S 1,058 771 720 753 836 881 993 711 697 717 904 933
Page 171
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Middle Schools
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Bailey MS 1,529 1,217 1,173 1,144 1,099 1,074 1,134 1,175 1,147 1,206 959 1,041
Bedichek MS 1,136 1,004 998 889 904 908 912 1,039 1,150 1,119 1,018 1,054
Burnet MS 1,126 1,065 1,063 1,008 1,084 1,045 970 1,005 988 912 969 998
Covington MS 752 855 939 945 911 889 862 910 1,014 954 950 805
Dobie MS 874 913 921 763 746 739 808 849 517 566 603 630
Fulmore MS 764 749 872 957 992 1,054 1,037 1,029 1,045 1,036 1,007 995
Garcia MS - - - - - - - - 605 649 689 658
Gorzycki MS - - - - - - - - - - 835 963
Kealing MS 958 1,058 978 948 1,029 1,277 1,190 1,251 1,215 1,279 1,242 1,233
Lamar MS 915 855 798 779 791 701 675 671 741 780 668 604
Martin MS 495 622 632 648 736 738 676 702 760 744 691 639
Mendez MS 1,313 874 857 828 840 776 840 1,108 1,029 903 871 890
Murchison MS 1,236 1,232 1,240 1,213 1,210 1,227 1,257 1,216 1,156 1,156 1,254 1,281
O. Henry MS 681 743 866 887 885 801 747 789 881 982 1,005 1,026
Paredes MS - 959 1,060 1,208 1,227 1,292 1,330 1,067 989 957 899 930
Pearce MS 958 849 859 852 847 801 810 809 580 516 452 329
Richards ( 6-8) MS - - - - - - - - 224 334 362 378
Small MS 929 1,054 1,080 1,108 1,129 1,088 1,114 1,140 1,167 1,188 944 959
Webb MS 805 777 779 789 767 748 663 658 495 522 573 591
Middle School Total 14,471 14,826 15,115 14,966 15,197 15,158 15,025 15,418 15,703 15,803 15,991 16,004
Page 173
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
High Schools
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Akins HS - 1,076 1,544 2,053 2,219 2,257 2,389 2,359 2,507 2,663 2,710 2,720
Anderson HS 1,804 1,742 1,763 1,959 1,959 1,997 2,121 2,013 2,093 2,096 2,000 2,089
Austin HS 2,167 2,014 2,136 2,149 2,158 2,245 2,207 2,124 2,240 2,343 2,390 2,337
Bowie HS 3,045 2,608 2,435 2,370 2,485 2,613 2,699 2,821 2,778 2,768 2,828 2,876
Crockett HS 2,529 2,414 2,174 2,099 1,999 1,962 2,038 1,992 1,907 1,857 1,763 1,686
E astside HS 1,826 1,479 1,359 1,008 975 1,068 775 760 691 556 679 718
Garza HS 318 339 384 347 307 266 280 308 315 301 258 260
International HS - - - - - - 258 264 185 202 230 176
LASA HS - - - - - - - - 858 860 874 881
LBJ HS 1,619 1,654 1,812 1,811 1,717 1,671 1,676 1,703 1,001 1,046 1,018 1,000
Lanier HS 1,855 1,762 1,666 1,915 1,794 1,793 1,674 1,619 1,693 1,608 1,594 1,624
McCallum HS 1,666 1,652 1,676 1,705 1,709 1,686 1,724 1,706 1,717 1,733 1,793 1,824
Reagan HS 1,405 1,394 1,276 1,304 1,169 1,064 1,029 989 973 988 958 901
Richards 9th and 10th - - - - - - - - - - 79 150
Travis HS 1,709 1,691 1,665 1,718 1,638 1,672 1,590 1,532 1,634 1,509 1,434 1,420
High School Total 19,943 19,825 19,890 20,438 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 102 44 311 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 159 145 155 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191
District Total 77,117 76,755 77,088 77,720 78,114 79,268 80,666 81,705 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929
Page 174
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Birth Data
Page 175
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010
Page 176
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 177
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Capacity Analysis
How many students can a building accommodate? This In AISD, functional capacity is reviewed on an annual
question often arises, and in the development of a basis. Functional capacity is a more realistic analysis of
facility master plan, can be one of the most debated what a building can accommodate and takes into
issues. It is not uncommon to review an evaluation of an account all special programs available at the school
existing building only to find that the capacity which was that year, in addition to any portable buildings located
once assigned to the building is considerably more than on site, to determine how many students can be
what the building can reasonably accommodate today. assigned to a particular school campus each school
year.
The main reason for this is that the programs in a public
school system and the manner in which they are For master planning purposes, an updated methodology
delivered have changed significantly since the building to the former AISD permanent capacity methodology
was originally built. More than half the square footage in was developed and applied. The formula for long-range
AISD was built before 1985. Twenty-five years ago, planning should reflect District programs, but should be
computer labs were just beginning to be incorporated kept simple and equitable since programs change from
into schools, and severely handicapped students, year to year while classroom square footages remain, for
previously assigned to specialized facilities, were not yet the most part, the same. Permanent capacity does not
mainstreamed into public schools. In addition, state incorporate temporary or portable classrooms, but only
legislation has mandated smaller student/teacher ratios. permanent space.
In facility planning, the term design capacity is used to Elementary School Permanent Capacity
describe simply counting the number of classrooms in a The elementary program is usually delivered based on
building and multiplying by an average class size. Even students being assigned to a home room and attending
though at first glance this seems only to be common special programs such as art, music, and physical
sense, this methodology does not take into account the education in a specialized classroom. The number of
programmatic implications of school facilities. special classrooms required is reflective of the total
number of students enrolled and is subtracted from the
total number of classrooms since the vacated home
room cannot be utilized by other students.
Age of AISD Permanent Buildings
Year Constructed Pre 1925 1925 - 1944 1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 1994 1995 - 2004 2005 - 2010
Total Square Feet 209,259 547,147 3,083,806 3,481,972 2,363,533 1,616,514 1,026,591
Building Count 5 33 90 77 65 59 33
Page 178
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
A 95% efficiency factor is applied since students do not movement to block scheduling, an efficiency factor of
always arrive in perfect sets of 22 students. Additionally, 75% is applied.
due to reduced class size and increased support space
needs for Title 1 schools, an 85% efficiency factor is The following describes the permanent capacity
applied to compute permanent capacity at these methodology for secondary schools.
facilities. Count permanent classrooms.
Multiply by 28 (average class size).
The following describes the permanent capacity Apply 75% efficiency factor; 70% efficiency factor
methodology for elementary schools. for Title 1 schools.
Count permanent classrooms.
Subtract special areas for music, art, etc. (3-7 Core Capacity
classrooms based on staffing ratios). Core capacity is defined as those spaces that large
Multiply by 22 (average class size). groups of students utilize at some point during the school
Apply 95% efficiency factor; 85% efficiency factor day, including the cafeteria, gymnasium, and library. As
for Title 1 schools. part of the new methodology, consideration was given
to lower permanent capacity if the cafeteria or
Secondary School Permanent Capacity gymnasium was less than 85% of permanent capacity,
Unlike elementary schools, at the secondary level based on the number of classrooms.
students are not in self-contained environments but are
traveling from one location to another each period. All The chart below shows the AISD standard for core space
classrooms are counted including the specialized sizes based on the current approved educational
spaces. Since it is difficult to schedule every teaching standards.
space every period of the day, in addition to the
Page 179
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Utilization
Page 180
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 181
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 182
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Page 183
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Facility Condition Analysis Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify
buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
Facility condition is the state of repair of the building closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends,
infrastructure. Facility condition takes into consideration community sentiment, and the availability of capital are
all of the building systems from roofs and windows to additional factors that are analyzed when making school
electrical and mechanical systems. Although there is a facility decisions.
cost associated with renovating every building
Cost of Repairs
according to current codes and standards, this does not = Facility Condition Index (FCI)
mean that all schools need massive and immediate Cost of Replacement
repairs and renovations. Rather, this provides an
understanding of the effort it would take to bring all The chart below indicates the distribution of campuses
facilities up to the same standard. by ranges of FCI in AISD. Please note that the support
facilities are included. Only one facility, Pease ES, falls
The facility condition information does provide the into the replace category; however, two schools, Zilker ES
following. and Wooten ES are between 50-59% and should be
Comparative analysis of building conditions considered for major renovation or replacement.
Approximate cost to address the facility conditions
FCI Campuses
of all buildings in the District
Understanding of which buildings are in the worse <10% Repair 18
conditions and that might be slated for more
immediate focus 10-19% Renovate 35
20-29% 30
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an
index called the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to 30-39% 31
benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. 40-49% 9
This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a
facility by the total cost to replace the facility. For
50-59% 2
example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might 60-69% Replace -
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now
70-79% 1
has $1 million in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by
$10 million results in an FCI of 10 percent. Industry 80-89% -
standards and financial modeling dictate that FCI 90-100% -
numbers above 65% or greater are more cost-effective
to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency gains >100% -
with more modern facilities and the value of the building
at the end of the analysis period. Total 126
Page 184
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
important to recognize that this cost is based on the PreK Centers $ 297.47 $ 4,783,318
replacement of a building with another facility that is the Elementary School $ 297.47 $ 24,541,275
same size and is fully code compliant. If, for example, Middle School $ 327.40 $ 55,658,000
you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot High School $ 323.11 $ 106,626,300
gymnasium building at a campus, the replacement cost
Alt. Ed. School $ 327.40 $ 6,548,000
is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square
Admin $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
foot building. Since the replacement cost comparison is
Support $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of Maintenance - Transportation $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
cost models have been developed that estimate the Portable Building $ 138.93 $ 213,396
Page 186
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Building Deficiencies
The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over 41,000 line
items district-wide. Deficiencies are categorized by the following priorities.
The chart below lists the facility type and the costs associated with correcting priorities 1 through 5. Logically, the greatest
need is at the elementary schools since this makes up the largest number of schools and the most square footage in the
District.
Total Other District Facil $ 3,505,621 $ 11,015,735 $ 18,491,824 $ 687,363 $ 694,123 $ 34,394,666
Page 187
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
The chart below provides a crosstab by building system. The greatest building system deficiency, as is typically the case,
is in the area of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Please note that the “Other” building system category
includes functional equity and ADA/TAS compliance.
A summary of building system by priority by individual school campus is available in the Facility Summary Reports with
Facility Master Plan Recommendations section of this report, pages 38-164.
Page 188
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011
Facility Options
Using the Educational Framework as guiding principles, Future growth – account for future population
the Facility Master Plan Task Force began the growth/decreases
complicated task of developing facility options and Facility condition – facility condition index rating
scenarios in order to meet their charge of developing
recommendations to improve facility efficiencies through
objective data analysis and community input. Over the course of seven months, 108 options that were
developed by the Task Force, consultants, and staff,
The information and data considered included the were reviewed and evaluated by the Task Force.
following.
An outline of the 108 options is provided in Appendix G of
Current condition of buildings (FCI) this report.
Educational adequacy of schools
Current and proposed instructional programs
Current and projected population growth and
decline
Lease obligations, current and possible use of
buildings, and administrative facilities
Page 189
EXHIBIT "B"
Appendix A
FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts
Page 190
EXHIBIT "B"
White Paper:
Facility Condition Index (FCI) at Austin ISD
The assessment of school facilities and the development of long-range master plans, is Magellan
Consulting’s core business. District-wide master plans, by their very nature, recommend changes across
a district. In nearly every district in which we work, there are building condition and student capacity
challenges. Often, there exists enough capacity across the district when compared to total student
enrollment; however, that capacity is rarely in the right place. In the last five years, every large urban
district we have worked with has faced considerable loss of enrollment district-wide which eventually
necessitates reducing overall footprint and closing schools. We typically see changes in educational
programs that make the alignment of facilities a challenge, as curriculum and delivery methods are ever-
evolving. Nearly 90 percent of our country’s 21st century schools were designed and constructed in the
20th century, most in the mid 20th century, under an industrial age factory model with a long row of
classrooms down a double-loaded corridor. The condition of schools, with the exception of very
wealthy districts, is declining across the country. The recent economic climate is exacerbates this
problem as maintenance funds are decreasing. Texas the new education funding system in Texas is
placing greater emphasis on the use of Maintenance and Operations (M&O) funds. Unfortunately,
deferred maintenance does not go away with reduced funding, and the unmet need continues to build
until the cost to repair eventually exceeds the cost to replace the facility.
Commonly, communities have a widespread perception that school districts shape, hide, or manipulate
building condition data to obtain a desired result. This perception may even result in a law suit, which
creates the necessity to engage in projects that are driven by legal requirements. While years ago there
may have been school districts that were guilty of these charges, particularly in the era of racial
segregation and the court-ordered desegregation that followed, the fact is that we have not seen data
manipulation at any of the districts in which we have worked for over a decade.
School district administrators and facility staffs continually request that we simplify the data and planning
parameters. The process of engaging the community offers a broad spectrum of individuals who want to
participate. These diverse groups of individuals may speak different languages, have different educational
backgrounds, different levels of school planning experience. Some may have a deep understanding of
mathematics and can easily read charts and graphs, while others will not. The main challenge herein, is
that the amount and type of data used in the planning process is very complex. Depending upon the
issue, capacity can include a variety of factors. Capacity may include only permanent space, or it may
include both permanent and temporary space. Capacity can be adjusted for smaller class sizes, and
utilization can affect capacity when smaller class sizes are required for special needs students. In
addition, the Facility Condition Index FCI may include only current costs, or it may include a forecast of
future system replacements that are going to occur within the next three to five years. Enrollment data
is often complicated by official enrollment, staffing enrollment, average daily membership, and even the
time of year. Although there is often a desire to simplify the information presented, it is not
always possible to do so while maintaining access to the kinds of data that are presented in
the complex planning process. The variables in data mean to the outside individual that numbers
may be different from one context to another. Capacities change from year to year, buildings
deteriorate on a daily basis, and enrollment fluctuates. School planners are always working with a
moving target.
Page 191
EXHIBIT "B"
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative
condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the
total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million
in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an FCI Campuses
FCI of 10 percent. The National Association of College and University
Business Officers has suggested for college planning that an FCI of less <10% Repair
than 5 percent is good, an FCI between 5 and 10 percent is fair, and an 10-19% Renovate
FCI greater than 10 percent is poor. In K-12 public school planning,
the gulf between 10 percent and 100 percent is just not stratified 20-29%
enough. For several years, Magellan Consulting has used the chart 30-39%
displayed to the right, with clients to provide a little more gradation.
40-49%
We often find district-wide FCI averages in the 20 to 30 percent range.
50-59%
Schools in the 30 to 60 percent range are probably the most difficult
to plan for long-term. Financial modeling has shown that over a 30- 60-69% Replace
year period, schools that fall in the 65 percent or greater range are
70-79%
more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency
gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the 80-89%
end of the analysis period. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used
90-100%
to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community >100%
sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are
analyzed when making school facility decision.
The FCI calculation, while seemingly simple, yields a consistent result that can commonly be compared
across districts, as the same factors are almost always considered in deriving the numerator and the
denominator. It should also be noted that there are nuances regarding the process for calculating FCI
that must be understood.
Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate
the cost per square foot for new construction. The cost models take into account national industry
averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as
Page 192
EXHIBIT "B"
the district’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then
multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration.
“Construction Cost” is a term that may mean different things to different people. To contractors,
construction cost generally means the amount they are paid to construct the building, and that figure
generally does not include a contingency for unforeseen conditions. To the school district facilities staff,
construction cost typically refers to the planning budget to construct the building plus a small
contingency for unforeseen conditions and may also include the cost to bring utilities to a site. To the
school board, construction cost often means the total costs spent on the project which includes the
architects’ fees and the cost to manage the overall construction program. Therefore, it is important to
be careful which costs to include in the replacement cost denominator calculation. For FCI purposes,
we include all of the costs associated with completing the project for the amount of funding that is
required in total. That includes the base construction cost (often referred to as “hard costs”); plus
inflation; plus professional fees; plus administrative costs for testing, surveys, and advertising; plus
management costs; plus contingencies; plus escalation to an estimated mid-point of construction (often
referred to as “soft costs”). These total costs are significantly more than the base construction cost
paid to the contractor. The following table shows the average costs used in determining the
replacement cost for AISD, based on the building type and the buildings’ gross square footage measured
to the outside of exterior walls.
ES MS HS Admin Portable
Square Feet 82,500 170,000 330,000 20,000 1,536
Cost / SqFt $ 185.54 $ 204.20 $ 201.53 $ 176.65 $ 85.97
Construction Cost $ 15,306,924.11 $ 34,714,158.47 $ 66,504,421.68 $ 3,532,981.28 $ 132,047.22
A/E Services $ 1,224,553.93 $ 2,777,132.68 $ 5,320,353.73 $ 317,968.32 $ 11,884.25
Site/Survey $ 30,613.85 $ 69,428.32 $ 133,008.84 $ 7,065.96 $ 264.09
Permits/Fees $ 68,881.16 $ 156,213.71 $ 299,269.90 $ 15,898.42 $ 198.07
Testing $ 114,801.93 $ 260,356.19 $ 498,783.16 $ 26,497.36 $ 660.24
Furn/Fixt/Equip (FF&E) $ 918,415.45 $ 2,082,849.51 $ 3,990,265.30 $ 141,319.25 $ 7,262.60
Other $ 612,276.96 $ 1,388,566.34 $ 2,660,176.87 $ 137,654.34 $ 6,602.36
Project Budget $ 18,276,467 $ 41,448,705 $ 79,406,279 $ 4,179,385 $ 158,919
Program-level contg @ 10% 1,827,647 4,144,871 7,940,628 417,938 15,892
Program Management $ 1,005,206 $ 2,279,679 $ 4,367,345 $ 229,866 $ 8,741
Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% $ 3,431,999 $ 7,783,337 $ 14,911,101 $ 784,815 $ 29,842
Total Program Cost $ 24,541,319 $ 55,656,592 $ 106,625,354 $ 5,612,004 $ 213,393
Page 193
EXHIBIT "B"
state to that of what would be replaced today. Generally, studies or hazardous material costs that might
be encountered even under a demolition scenario would not be included.
At AISD, the district retained a firm in 2006 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost
estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included a walkthrough of all facilities using architects and
engineers to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the
condition of the existing buildings and did not include educational adequacy or functional equity type
needs (more on that later). All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a
Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin,
Texas area was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates,
using the industry standard line item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility
assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. The construction cost
value of all of these deficient conditions, prior to adding soft costs for professional fees, contingency, and
escalation total approximately $444.9 million.
However, the facility condition assessment did not focus on what the assessment industry calls
“educational adequacy” items. Where a building assessment focuses on the condition of the building and
what is broken, an educational adequacy assessment focuses on how well the school supports the
instructional mission and looks objectively at what is missing. As part of this master planning effort,
AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. This assessment made use of the
district’s educational specifications, supplemented with information collected during a three-day
workshop that involved numerous staff, principals, and teachers. A set of standards was developed for
each school type, the buildings typically found on the campus, and for each instructional space. These
standards identified in detail the size of the teaching spaces, the number of students in each space,
physical conditions, plumbing requirements, the number of computer outlets and electrical plugs, and
the type of instructional support for each space, in addition to safety and supervision considerations.
During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each
space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the previously developed standards to
identify when an individual space did not meet a specific standard. When an item did not meet the
standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget
to correct that condition. This has resulted in the identification of approximately $184.8 million in
educational adequacy-related deficiencies.
The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over
41,000 line items district-wide. Base costs must added up to provide a total that is comparable to the
replacement cost total program budgets use as the denominator of the calculation. Again, the design
and construction industry commonly refers to these costs as “soft costs.” The soft costs factoring is
done at a deficiency level, and every deficiency receives a specific cost allocation. The facilities staff of
AISD has conducted a review of recent projects to gain a better understanding of the associated costs
based on a variety of different types of repairs. The district has an established default soft costs factor
that is added to deficiencies of a standard nature. However, air conditioning and mechanical-related
deficiencies are typically done by mechanical contractors that may require additional engineering
requirements. For this reason, a separate model was established for all HVAC/mechanical repairs. For
life safety-related deficiencies, including security cameras and alarms, the costs are primarily equipment
related and do not have requirements for design and engineering so they too have their own model.
The deficiencies noted for ADA repairs were developed under a slightly different cost structure so a
different factor is applied to these items to provide consistent cost estimates at the project level.
Finally, the functional equity needs for additions and new construction on existing campuses have their
Page 194
EXHIBIT "B"
own soft cost model. The following chart shows the percentage factors that are applied to every $100
of estimated repair cost to derive the total repair cost figure used in calculating the FCI.
Default HVAC Life Safety ADA Equity
Cost Basis $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
Construction Cost $ 138.46 $ 138.46 $ 103.46 $ 196.37 $ 196.37
A/E Services $ 20.77 $ 20.77 $ 4.14 $ 29.46 $ 29.46
Permits/Fees $ 0.62 $ 0.62 $ 0.47 $ 0.88 $ 0.88
Testing $ 0.42 $ 0.42 $ - $ 0.59 $ 0.59
Other $ 23.26 $ 28.11 $ 1.34 $ 32.99 $ 32.99
Project Budget $ 184 $ 188 $ 109 $ 260 $ 260
Program-level contg @ 10% 18 19 11 26 26
Program Management $ 10 $ 10 $ 6 $ 14 $ 14
Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% $ 34 $ 35 $ 21 $ 49 $ 49
Total Program Cost $ 246 $ 253 $ 147 $ 350 $ 350
Soft Cost Factor (%) 78% 83% 42% 78% 78%
The total facility condition cost totals approximately $963.1 million after adding soft costs to the costs
for correcting deficient building and ADA conditions and the educational adequacy costs. During the
August work sessions, the need was approximated at $875 million, but at that time it was believed that
the need would eventually be lowered as data was reviewed. The $875 million figure really represented
the total construction cost (hard cost) required to correct current deficiencies. Indeed the comparable
cost has decreased to about $558.4 million; however, the overall total need is now about $1.1 billion,
including functional equity needs at 44 campuses (discussed in more detail below). Since the August
worksession:
1 Deficiencies have been reviewed and, in some cases, modified by AISD facilities staff (part of
ongoing AISD facility management procedures) – decreased cost.
2 Overlapping cost between ADA studies and building condition deficiencies have been addressed
– decreased cost.
3 Overlapping cost between functional equity deficiencies, ADA deficiencies, and building
condition deficiencies have been addressed – decreased cost.
4 Overlapping cost between educational adequacy deficiencies and building condition deficiencies
have been addressed – decreased cost.
5 Location factor that adjusts RSMeans® data to the Austin area has been corrected – decreased
cost.
6 Algorithm that applies the location factor to RSMeans® data has been corrected – decreased
cost.
7 Revised soft cost models have been developed and applied to accurately reflect the total cost
required to correct deficiencies in a potential capital improvement program – increased cost.
Functional equity needs are different from educational adequacy needs. Educational adequacy is an
analysis of the existing conditions to determine if they meet the district’s educational specifications and
to determine which corrections can logically be made to achieve the standards in an existing structure.
Functional equity is an analysis comparing the area allocations for areas within the school to determine if
they meet the current educational specifications based on the target number of students at the school.
This analysis has resulted in the recommendation for additions to expand libraries, gymnasiums,
cafeterias, administration spaces, and classrooms at several locations. These additions constitute new
space and are therefore not included in the calculation of the FCI. A summary of the functional equity
improvements, although not included in the FCI calculation, is included for reference below.
Page 195
EXHIBIT "B"
School Number and Name Library Gym Cafeteria Admin Classroom Total
009 Anderson HS - 7,558,381 - - 737,651 8,296,032
002 Austin HS 93,707 1,000,768 - 341,590 6,583,925 8,019,990
005 McCallum HS 1,056,715 974,456 - - - 2,031,171
007 Travis HS - 497,614 - - - 497,614
Page 196
EXHIBIT "B"
FCI Results
For AISD, the FCI calculations include the building condition assessment results, the educational
adequacy assessment results, and the type one and two ADA compliance considerations and then
compare them to the cost of replacing the same facility. These FCI figures provide a benchmark that can
be used to consistently compare AISD facilities district-wide. The planning team refers to the FCI to aid
in decision making when a school or building is subject to renovation, when a change in educational
program is contemplated, or when the school is targeted for replacement, consolidation, or closure for
efficiency reasons. It is not the principle driver, but rather a supporting consideration to guide the
district and hopefully prohibit the district from making additional investment into a building that is close
to or has reached the end of its serviceable life. The following chart is a summary of all of the district’s
facilities by FCI. The one school that falls in the 70-79 percent range is Pease Elementary, a historic
location celebrated as the longest operating public school in the state.
FCI Campuses
<10% Repair 18
10-19% Renovate 35
20-29% 30
30-39% 31
40-49% 9
50-59% 2
60-69% Replace -
70-79% 1
80-89% -
90-100% -
>100% -
Total 126
Page 197
EXHIBIT "B"
Elementary Schools
142 Allan Elementary School PK-5 1957 19.5 $ 1,254,683 $ 1,688,882 $ 2,943,565 $ 6,645,881 $ 558,919 $ 1,074,557 $ 11,222,922 $ 10,148,366 $ 33,497,560 30.3% $ 1,030,588 $ 1,511,428
101 Allison Elementary School PK-6 1955 10.7 $ 173,617 $ 1,354,132 $ 1,527,749 $ 2,450,503 $ 210,014 $ 10,288 $ 4,198,553 $ 4,188,265 $ 20,556,998 20.4% $ - $ 907,125
102 Andrews Elementary School PK-5 1962 7.7 $ 573,941 $ 2,633,109 $ 3,207,050 $ 3,502,631 $ 190,659 $ 1,517,264 $ 8,417,604 $ 6,737,774 $ 21,020,456 32.1% $ 1,453,514 $ 1,030,292
187 Baldwin Elementary School PK-5 2010 0.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.0% $ - $ -
182 Baranoff Elementary School K-5 1999 15.6 $ 197,873 $ 531,250 $ 729,123 $ 1,814,399 $ 277,997 $ 121,554 $ 2,943,072 $ 2,821,518 $ 25,651,479 11.0% $ - $ 1,069,123
149 Barrington Elementary School PK-6 1969 12.1 $ 329,948 $ 476,461 $ 806,409 $ 5,220,479 $ 311,342 $ 2,708,483 $ 9,046,714 $ 6,338,231 $ 29,888,351 21.2% $ 2,688,134 $ 1,146,187
103 Barton Hills Elementary School K-6 1964 9.9 $ 1,022,269 $ 236,671 $ 1,258,939 $ 2,637,192 $ 447,186 $ 2,391 $ 4,345,708 $ 4,343,317 $ 14,588,847 29.8% $ - $ 439,914
104 Becker Elementary School PK-5 1936 3.7 $ 1,114,902 $ 2,117,554 $ 3,232,456 $ 3,621,985 $ 252,949 $ 118,363 $ 7,225,752 $ 7,107,389 $ 18,663,896 38.1% $ - $ 977,746
105 Blackshear Elementary School PK-5 1903 5.3 $ 188,148 $ 2,178,265 $ 2,366,412 $ 4,202,512 $ 796,536 $ 58,019 $ 7,423,480 $ 7,365,461 $ 21,038,900 35.0% $ - $ 705,474
106 Blanton Elementary School PK-5 1964 8.0 $ 642,778 $ 1,082,233 $ 1,725,011 $ 2,850,419 $ 230,709 $ 59,146 $ 4,865,285 $ 4,806,139 $ 24,561,843 19.6% $ - $ 1,313,917
185 Blazier Elementary School PK-5 2008 15.4 $ 136,781 $ 177,879 $ 314,660 $ 897,555 $ 205,711 $ - $ 1,417,926 $ 1,417,926 $ 27,857,817 5.1% $ - $ 978,883
170 Boone Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.5 $ 489,966 $ 135,370 $ 625,336 $ 2,854,265 $ 348,141 $ 318,391 $ 4,146,133 $ 3,827,742 $ 21,920,602 17.5% $ - $ 991,368
107 Brentwood Elementary School PK-5 1951 16.7 $ 286,613 $ 693,809 $ 980,422 $ 3,381,304 $ 190,212 $ 1,625,875 $ 6,177,813 $ 4,551,938 $ 19,622,049 23.2% $ 1,622,094 $ 973,002
108 Brooke Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.9 $ 466,533 $ 728,683 $ 1,195,217 $ 2,708,300 $ 262,136 $ 37,886 $ 4,203,538 $ 4,165,652 $ 16,699,995 24.9% $ - $ 888,465
109 Brown Elementary School PK-6 1957 10.1 $ 1,580,199 $ 1,153,153 $ 2,733,352 $ 1,909,309 $ 635,293 $ 2,665,997 $ 7,943,951 $ 5,277,954 $ 18,761,168 28.1% $ 2,663,484 $ 801,611
110 Bryker Woods Elementary School K-6 1939 6.3 $ 189,411 $ 1,119,527 $ 1,308,938 $ 2,979,081 $ 348,606 $ 44,654 $ 4,681,279 $ 4,636,625 $ 13,901,689 33.4% $ - $ 863,756
111 Campbell Elementary School PK-5 1992 9.7 $ 311,592 $ 379,698 $ 691,291 $ 3,030,703 $ 197,160 $ 377,355 $ 4,296,509 $ 3,919,154 $ 18,838,511 20.8% $ - $ 766,024
173 Casey Elementary School PK-5 1998 17.9 $ 332,832 $ 218,621 $ 551,453 $ 1,280,715 $ 2,281,070 $ 78,748 $ 4,191,986 $ 4,113,238 $ 24,702,547 16.7% $ - $ 930,563
112 Casis Elementary School PK-5 1951 14.2 $ 280,022 $ 632,024 $ 912,046 $ 3,096,268 $ 731,873 $ 60,579 $ 4,800,767 $ 4,740,187 $ 27,288,458 17.4% $ - $ 1,460,287
184 Clayton Elementary School K-5 2006 16.8 $ 136,427 $ 382,446 $ 518,872 $ 1,142,866 $ 215,392 $ - $ 1,877,130 $ 1,877,130 $ 31,551,211 5.9% $ - $ 1,404,862
161 Cook Elementary School K-5 1974 12.7 $ 847,723 $ 3,046,998 $ 3,894,721 $ 2,836,484 $ 275,616 $ 3,529,726 $ 10,536,548 $ 7,006,822 $ 25,515,832 27.5% $ 3,472,684 $ 1,093,546
183 Cowan Elementary School PK-5 1999 22.5 $ 441,004 $ 282,482 $ 723,486 $ 1,163,772 $ 269,668 $ 287,289 $ 2,444,215 $ 2,156,926 $ 23,634,032 9.1% $ - $ 1,007,303
113 Cunningham Elementary School PK-5 1963 8.8 $ 174,656 $ 203,988 $ 378,644 $ 8,662,602 $ 475,256 $ 3,523,663 $ 13,040,166 $ 9,488,259 $ 27,695,695 34.3% $ 3,471,761 $ 1,336,362
179 Davis Elementary School PK-5 1993 13.2 $ 375,946 $ 245,779 $ 621,725 $ 4,466,364 $ 242,164 $ 172,691 $ 5,502,944 $ 5,330,253 $ 22,832,945 23.3% $ - $ 1,062,050
114 Dawson Elementary School PK-5 1954 8.7 $ 825,023 $ 1,788,448 $ 2,613,471 $ 2,164,807 $ 124,053 $ 1,374,936 $ 6,277,266 $ 4,902,331 $ 18,054,973 27.2% $ 1,332,942 $ 812,429
154 Doss Elementary School PK-5 1970 9.7 $ 277,493 $ 1,753,192 $ 2,030,684 $ 3,366,419 $ 262,383 $ 585,467 $ 6,244,954 $ 5,659,486 $ 21,571,372 26.2% $ 548,668 $ 867,630
176 Galindo Elementary School PK-5 1989 10.8 $ 718,525 $ 472,173 $ 1,190,697 $ 1,724,238 $ 237,955 $ 162,944 $ 3,315,834 $ 3,152,890 $ 27,712,949 11.4% $ - $ 1,255,082
116 Govalle Elementary School PK-5 1940 8.4 $ 340,133 $ 1,139,527 $ 1,479,660 $ 4,269,803 $ 1,386,730 $ 3,711,107 $ 10,847,299 $ 7,136,192 $ 23,095,017 30.9% $ 3,614,398 $ 935,305
159 Graham Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.9 $ 776,380 $ 3,942,191 $ 4,718,571 $ 2,175,356 $ 462,863 $ 145,540 $ 7,502,330 $ 7,356,790 $ 24,196,550 30.4% $ - $ 874,097
117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 1956 17.9 $ 296,279 $ 477,899 $ 774,178 $ 3,404,040 $ 278,491 $ 5,578,522 $ 10,035,231 $ 4,456,709 $ 15,275,706 29.2% $ 5,538,153 $ 1,100,391
118 Harris Elementary School PK-5 1955 7.3 $ 168,662 $ 462,786 $ 631,447 $ 3,593,988 $ 351,166 $ 26,321 $ 4,602,922 $ 4,576,600 $ 21,247,129 21.5% $ - $ 1,301,321
163 Hart Elementary School PK-5 1998 15.7 $ 440,103 $ 429,303 $ 869,405 $ 1,705,738 $ 330,538 $ 150,402 $ 3,056,083 $ 2,905,681 $ 28,219,837 10.3% $ - $ 1,071,119
119 Highland Park Elementary School K-5 1952 6.3 $ 378,590 $ 549,487 $ 928,077 $ 5,117,848 $ 220,844 $ 2,357,371 $ 8,624,139 $ 6,266,769 $ 20,158,386 31.1% $ 2,314,969 $ 1,112,435
155 Hill Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.9 $ 369,298 $ 762,743 $ 1,132,041 $ 4,753,883 $ 395,173 $ 2,849,188 $ 9,130,285 $ 6,281,096 $ 23,453,170 26.8% $ 2,816,276 $ 921,105
162 Houston Elementary School PK-5 1976 13.8 $ 347,984 $ 5,056,005 $ 5,403,989 $ 4,782,952 $ 313,940 $ 513,050 $ 11,013,932 $ 10,500,882 $ 28,771,349 36.5% $ 452,838 $ 1,698,239
178 Jordan Elementary School PK-5 1992 11.5 $ 344,244 $ 526,308 $ 870,552 $ 4,497,788 $ 305,917 $ 366,415 $ 6,040,673 $ 5,674,257 $ 25,804,974 22.0% $ - $ 1,294,151
120 Joslin Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.1 $ 365,427 $ 1,658,814 $ 2,024,241 $ 3,828,081 $ 489,316 $ 1,761,730 $ 8,103,367 $ 6,341,638 $ 15,618,987 40.6% $ 1,726,417 $ 905,386
180 Kiker Elementary School K-5 1992 12.4 $ 465,453 $ 285,692 $ 751,145 $ 3,481,469 $ 231,480 $ 270,058 $ 4,734,153 $ 4,464,095 $ 27,275,667 16.4% $ - $ 945,244
172 Kocurek Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.3 $ 276,757 $ 739,213 $ 1,015,969 $ 4,710,718 $ 337,850 $ 84,409 $ 6,148,946 $ 6,064,538 $ 23,816,680 25.5% $ - $ 1,239,761
168 Langford Elementary School PK-5 1980 10.7 $ 543,183 $ 5,823,122 $ 6,366,305 $ 2,847,265 $ 293,128 $ 600,073 $ 10,106,772 $ 9,506,698 $ 28,303,131 33.6% $ - $ 1,519,228
121 Lee Elementary School K-6 1939 4.8 $ 426,784 $ 1,565,236 $ 1,992,020 $ 3,564,212 $ 200,247 $ 36,675 $ 5,793,153 $ 5,756,478 $ 13,990,931 41.1% $ - $ 1,268,395
160 Linder Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.1 $ 170,717 $ 1,486,942 $ 1,657,659 $ 3,064,256 $ 373,892 $ 5,824,800 $ 10,920,607 $ 5,095,807 $ 25,625,896 19.9% $ 5,754,971 $ 876,187
131 Lucy Read Pre-K School PK 1961 9.9 $ 191,332 $ 843,430 $ 1,034,762 $ 1,221,125 $ 154,414 $ 9,470 $ 2,419,771 $ 2,410,301 $ 21,971,173 11.0% $ - $ 715,064
122 Maplewood Elementary School PK-6 1951 6.4 $ 1,630,235 $ 367,527 $ 1,997,762 $ 3,955,287 $ 119,540 $ 2,005,569 $ 8,078,158 $ 6,072,588 $ 16,243,675 37.4% $ 1,958,007 $ 648,571
123 Mathews Elementary School PK-6 1916 2.3 $ 103,898 $ 1,407,923 $ 1,511,822 $ 2,537,969 $ 285,980 $ 2,282,922 $ 6,618,692 $ 4,335,770 $ 13,897,228 31.2% $ 2,258,699 $ 841,669
165 McBee Elementary School K-5 1999 10.9 $ 237,524 $ 319,343 $ 556,867 $ 1,036,048 $ 242,383 $ 57,384 $ 1,892,682 $ 1,835,298 $ 23,236,719 7.9% $ - $ 883,087
Page 198
EXHIBIT "B"
Page 199
EXHIBIT "B"
Middle Schools
059 Bailey Middle School 6-8 1993 41.3 $ 718,590 $ 2,307,324 $ 3,025,915 $ 4,249,984 $ 1,260,797 $ 175,348 $ 8,712,044 $ 8,538,264 $ 52,022,435 16.4% $ - $ 2,483,427
054 Bedichek Middle School 6-8 1972 23.3 $ 6,051,876 $ 3,947,712 $ 9,999,588 $ 4,289,394 $ 1,517,014 $ 13,820,241 $ 29,626,237 $ 15,805,996 $ 51,604,343 30.6% $ 13,761,948 $ 2,467,186
046 Burnet Middle School 6-8 1961 23.7 $ 696,528 $ 7,228,821 $ 7,925,349 $ 8,242,121 $ 1,461,392 $ 1,228,083 $ 18,856,946 $ 17,628,862 $ 51,140,088 34.5% $ 1,167,871 $ 2,786,054
057 Covington Middle School 6-8 1986 21.3 $ 961,398 $ 3,791,641 $ 4,753,039 $ 5,457,787 $ 679,240 $ 1,960,490 $ 12,850,556 $ 10,890,066 $ 58,357,322 18.7% $ 1,633,542 $ 2,218,938
055 Dobie Middle School 6-8 1973 20.2 $ 819,317 $ 1,032,156 $ 1,851,474 $ 3,993,260 $ 1,153,996 $ 6,327,599 $ 13,326,328 $ 6,998,729 $ 46,067,662 15.2% $ 6,294,500 $ 2,605,739
043 Fulmore Middle School 6-8 1911 9.8 $ 1,675,047 $ 7,905,746 $ 9,580,793 $ 11,125,201 $ 1,520,831 $ 353,775 $ 22,580,600 $ 22,226,825 $ 54,800,107 40.6% $ - $ 1,873,471
056 Garcia Middle School 6-8 2008 41.3 $ 341,779 $ 375,320 $ 717,098 $ 1,477,213 $ 256,690 $ - $ 2,451,001 $ 2,451,001 $ 52,634,348 4.7% $ - $ 1,785,189
062 Gorzycki Middle School 6-8 2009 14.2 $ 309,464 $ 330,542 $ 640,006 $ 1,551,469 $ 435,269 $ - $ 2,626,743 $ 2,626,743 $ 57,473,012 4.6% $ - $ 1,948,774
044 Kealing Middle School 6-8 1986 13.2 $ 375,942 $ 4,974,961 $ 5,350,903 $ 5,384,570 $ 962,232 $ 464,321 $ 12,162,026 $ 11,697,705 $ 62,920,315 18.6% $ - $ 2,797,674
045 Lamar Middle School 6-8 1955 14.3 $ 868,115 $ 2,862,857 $ 3,730,973 $ 3,240,381 $ 1,109,337 $ 19,344 $ 8,100,034 $ 7,963,458 $ 41,245,693 19.3% $ - $ 2,294,389
051 Martin Middle School 6-8 1966 9.9 $ 529,628 $ 6,008,583 $ 6,538,211 $ 4,037,673 $ 630,629 $ 3,297,183 $ 14,503,696 $ 11,206,513 $ 38,873,997 28.8% $ 3,222,769 $ 1,488,156
058 Mendez Middle School 6-8 1987 20.7 $ 1,080,210 $ 4,069,741 $ 5,149,951 $ 3,162,498 $ 903,869 $ 1,830,512 $ 11,046,831 $ 9,216,319 $ 61,291,493 15.0% $ 1,701,214 $ 2,294,128
052 Murchison Middle School 6-8 1967 26.2 $ 485,127 $ 1,623,549 $ 2,108,676 $ 5,951,701 $ 1,040,012 $ 8,153,256 $ 17,253,644 $ 9,100,388 $ 45,706,537 19.9% $ 7,989,851 $ 1,754,965
047 O. Henry Middle School 6-8 1953 13.8 $ 287,063 $ 788,273 $ 1,075,336 $ 4,249,201 $ 368,706 $ 3,270,833 $ 8,964,076 $ 5,693,243 $ 42,714,090 13.3% $ 3,236,248 $ 1,604,680
061 Paredes Middle School 6-8 2000 78.2 $ 639,397 $ 655,597 $ 1,294,994 $ 2,788,004 $ 1,505,034 $ 274,674 $ 5,862,705 $ 5,588,032 $ 50,694,496 11.0% $ - $ 3,031,743
048 Pearce Middle School 6-8 1958 14.8 $ 797,160 $ 1,469,168 $ 2,266,328 $ 3,870,033 $ 437,683 $ 797,883 $ 7,371,927 $ 6,574,044 $ 43,914,998 15.0% $ 770,887 $ 1,421,448
028 Ann Richards School 6-10 1958 15.3 $ 1,751,415 $ 2,490,074 $ 4,241,489 $ 10,459,899 $ 775,306 $ 126,188 $ 15,602,883 $ 15,476,695 $ 45,071,376 34.3% $ - $ 1,975,612
060 Small Middle School 6-8 1999 36.5 $ 354,444 $ 1,045,835 $ 1,400,279 $ 1,980,661 $ 354,205 $ 162,029 $ 3,897,174 $ 3,735,145 $ 54,088,993 6.9% $ - $ 1,928,150
053 Webb Middle School 6-8 1961 15.6 $ 420,533 $ 3,515,438 $ 3,935,971 $ 3,080,033 $ 1,413,498 $ 733,661 $ 9,163,164 $ 8,429,502 $ 42,628,637 19.8% $ 703,954 $ 2,101,392
High Schools
017 Akins High School 9-12 2000 57.7 $ 954,259 $ 1,208,558 $ 2,162,817 $ 3,966,511 $ 1,452,488 $ 134,171 $ 7,715,986 $ 7,581,815 $ 115,209,011 6.6% $ - $ 4,294,809
009 Anderson High School 9-12 1973 38.8 $ 883,879 $ 7,269,324 $ 8,153,203 $ 9,335,056 $ 1,959,665 $ 8,421,936 $ 27,869,861 $ 27,743,960 $ 100,442,692 27.6% $ 8,296,036 $ 5,596,292
002 Austin High School 9-12 1975 44.3 $ 1,821,769 $ 8,599,187 $ 10,420,955 $ 17,067,949 $ 4,155,102 $ 8,187,414 $ 39,831,421 $ 31,644,007 $ 101,704,101 31.1% $ 8,019,994 $ 4,786,572
013 Bowie High School 9-12 1988 66.0 $ 1,142,743 $ 13,619,484 $ 14,762,227 $ 14,517,730 $ 15,147,412 $ 884,595 $ 45,311,964 $ 44,427,369 $ 141,414,289 31.4% $ - $ 16,682,721
008 Crockett High School 9-12 1969 39.5 $ 1,822,148 $ 10,610,065 $ 12,432,213 $ 19,394,213 $ 3,011,592 $ 186,183 $ 35,024,201 $ 34,838,018 $ 111,743,044 31.2% $ - $ 3,899,330
019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) 9-12 1960 27.6 $ 3,510,942 $ 12,123,425 $ 15,634,366 $ 7,266,111 $ 650,888 $ 213,544 $ 23,764,910 $ 23,551,366 $ 87,276,402 27.0% $ - $ 2,370,779
015 Garza Independence High School 11-12 1939 3.1 $ 528,781 $ 925,712 $ 1,454,494 $ 1,791,072 $ 516,483 $ 198,632 $ 3,960,682 $ 3,762,050 $ 17,523,392 21.5% $ - $ 1,160,890
029 International High School 9-10 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.0% $ - $ -
014 Johnson (LBJ) High School 9-12 1974 41.4 $ 1,082,734 $ 3,932,853 $ 5,015,587 $ 7,240,361 $ 1,922,200 $ 96,326 $ 14,274,474 $ 14,178,148 $ 98,621,982 14.4% $ - $ 3,610,445
004 Lanier High School 9-12 1966 28.5 $ 1,328,937 $ 4,526,958 $ 5,855,895 $ 12,659,556 $ 1,639,563 $ 176,389 $ 20,331,402 $ 20,155,013 $ 91,315,888 22.1% $ - $ 3,798,556
018 LASA 9-12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.0% $ - $ -
005 McCallum High School 9-12 1953 31.1 $ 1,149,580 $ 3,763,557 $ 4,913,137 $ 10,864,608 $ 1,362,340 $ 2,583,395 $ 19,723,479 $ 17,140,084 $ 83,866,651 20.4% $ 2,352,452 $ 3,347,251
006 Reagan High School 9-12 1965 31.8 $ 1,208,310 $ 865,508 $ 2,073,817 $ 12,941,528 $ 3,120,501 $ 348,003 $ 18,483,850 $ 18,135,847 $ 81,643,031 22.2% $ - $ 5,067,540
007 Travis High School 9-12 1953 34.8 $ 1,049,482 $ 1,617,099 $ 2,666,581 $ 24,320,432 $ 1,903,928 $ 870,745 $ 29,761,687 $ 28,890,942 $ 95,250,042 30.3% $ 685,951 $ 3,901,369
Other Facilities
852 Clifton Center Alt. Ed. 1977 7.8 $ 255,304 $ 1,789,699 $ 2,045,003 $ 2,557,341 $ 752,437 $ 36,615 $ 5,391,397 $ 5,354,782 $ 13,110,071 40.8% $ - $ 1,163,512
012 Ridgeview ALC 6-12 1953 19.8 $ 594,690 $ 1,052,657 $ 1,647,347 $ 7,759,365 $ 1,468,980 $ 32,018 $ 10,907,709 $ 10,875,692 $ 31,629,925 34.4% $ - $ 843,199
251 Rosedale School Alt. Ed. 1939 4.9 $ 492,433 $ 462,750 $ 955,183 $ 3,490,585 $ 251,739 $ 68,255 $ 4,765,762 $ 4,697,506 $ 14,472,614 32.5% $ - $ 777,226
252 Baker Center 1911 4.8 $ 282,216 $ 1,676,261 $ 1,958,477 $ 1,224,224 $ - $ 202,910 $ 3,385,610 $ 3,182,700 $ 18,483,157 17.2% $ - $ -
951 Burger Athletic Complex 1977 48.1 $ 1,189,463 $ 7,099,714 $ 8,289,176 $ 3,529,618 $ 35,546 $ 42,012 $ 11,896,352 $ 11,854,340 $ 50,681,646 23.4% $ - $ -
941 Carruth Administration Center 1991 2.8 $ 180,247 $ 903,444 $ 1,083,691 $ 5,448,615 $ 269,285 $ - $ 6,801,590 $ 6,801,590 $ 37,598,528 18.1% $ - $ -
922 Central Warehouse 1983 18.7 $ 268,665 $ 404,270 $ 672,935 $ 725,905 $ - $ 11,195 $ 1,410,034 $ 1,398,840 $ 27,023,496 5.2% $ - $ -
949 Delco Activity Center 2003 44.1 $ 259,623 $ 205,193 $ 464,817 $ 170,579 $ 10,355 $ - $ 645,750 $ 645,750 $ 16,919,044 3.8% $ - $ -
948 House Park 1936 11.1 $ 137,227 $ 70,034 $ 207,260 $ 730,632 $ - $ 157,489 $ 1,095,381 $ 915,722 $ 8,999,133 10.2% $ - $ -
281 Nelson Field 1963 20.1 $ 422,773 $ - $ 422,773 $ 1,663,288 $ - $ 91,966 $ 2,178,027 $ 2,086,061 $ 16,557,338 12.6% $ - $ -
959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal 1995 6.6 $ 70,197 $ 81,921 $ 152,119 $ 58,564 $ 61,039 $ 24,167 $ 295,889 $ 271,722 $ 4,105,030 6.6% $ - $ -
950 Noack Sports Complex 2004 11.2 $ 126,224 $ - $ 126,224 $ - $ - $ - $ 126,224 $ 126,224 $ 906,929 13.9% $ - $ -
942 Pleasant Hill Annex 1936 2.0 $ 270,019 $ 180,761 $ 450,779 $ 2,381,648 $ 94,588 $ - $ 2,927,015 $ 2,927,015 $ 7,228,209 40.5% $ - $ -
960 Saegert Transportation 1975 10.6 $ 128,439 $ 185,122 $ 313,561 $ 1,456,374 $ 172,306 $ 28,659 $ 1,970,900 $ 1,942,241 $ 7,983,889 24.3% $ - $ -
962 Service Center - Building & Grounds 1991 16.7 $ 170,528 $ 209,015 $ 379,543 $ 1,102,379 $ 44,245 $ 135,726 $ 1,661,892 $ 1,526,167 $ 15,239,037 10.0% $ - $ 15,999
Total $ 77,451,146 $ 242,076,008 $ 319,527,153 0 $ 522,702,751 $ 88,789,541 $ 144,246,781 $ 1,075,266,227 0 $ 938,928,480 $ 4,112,139,818 22.8% $ 130,776,864 $ 184,824,729
Page 200
EXHIBIT "B"
Appendix B
Facility Capacity Charts and
Population Updates
Page 201
AISD Permanent Capacity EXHIBIT "B"
Cafeteria = 4,200 SF / 880 Students Gym = 3,000 SF / 880 Students Library = 3,500 SF / 880 Students
Classroom Capacity 4.77 SF per Student 3.41 SF per Student 3.98 SF per Student
Average
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 4.77 SF per based on Café / Gym Area 3.41 SF per based on Gym / Library 3.98 SF per based on Library /
LOC Elementary Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
142 Allan 673 379 56% 357 53% 42 6 22 85% 673 5,483 4.77 1,149 171% 6,160 3.41 1,806 268% 6,704 3.98 1,685 250%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 536 110% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,513 4.77 736 151% 2,972 3.41 871 179% 3,636 3.98 914 188%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 604 124% 31 5 22 85% 486 3,361 4.77 705 145% 3,192 3.41 936 192% 2,217 3.98 557 115%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 488 73% 38 6 22 95% 669 4,507 4.77 945 141% 3,183 3.41 933 140% 3,598 3.98 904 135%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 881 111% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,845 4.77 806 102% 2,878 3.41 844 106% 2,850 3.98 716 90%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 909 163% 41 6 22 85% 655 2,574 4.77 540 82% 2,558 3.41 750 115% 2,642 3.98 664 101%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 184 73% 14 2 22 95% 251 2,707 4.77 567 226% 2,329 3.41 683 272% 2,834 3.98 712 284%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 214 41% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,337 4.77 700 134% 3,403 3.41 998 191% 2,116 3.98 532 102%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 255 43% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,117 4.77 653 109% 3,054 3.41 896 150% 2,246 3.98 564 94%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 667 105% 40 6 22 85% 636 3,052 4.77 640 101% 2,531 3.41 742 117% 2,723 3.98 684 108%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 827 138% 38 6 22 85% 598 5,258 4.77 1,102 184% 3,203 3.41 939 157% 3,480 3.98 874 146%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 496 66% 42 6 22 95% 752 4,052 4.77 850 113% 2,887 3.41 847 113% 3,384 3.98 850 113%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 419 72% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,468 4.77 517 88% 2,447 3.41 718 123% 3,078 3.98 773 132%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 449 104% 27 4 22 85% 430 2,363 4.77 495 115% 2,328 3.41 683 159% 2,743 3.98 689 160%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 480 103% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,944 4.77 827 177% 2,426 3.41 712 152% 3,139 3.98 789 169%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 283 104% 16 3 22 95% 272 2,296 4.77 481 177% 2,987 3.41 876 322% 2,307 3.98 580 213%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 377 72% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,129 4.77 866 165% 3,030 3.41 889 170% 2,777 3.98 698 133%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 652 92% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,425 4.77 928 131% 3,055 3.41 896 126% 2,757 3.98 693 97%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 729 109% 38 6 22 95% 669 3,962 4.77 831 124% 2,588 3.41 759 113% 3,736 3.98 939 140%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 734 88% 47 7 22 95% 836 4,282 4.77 898 107% 3,025 3.41 887 106% 3,576 3.98 898 107%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,173 209% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,242 4.77 680 121% 2,365 3.41 694 124% 3,375 3.98 848 151%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 678 101% 37 5 22 95% 669 4,060 4.77 851 127% 2,985 3.41 875 131% 2,968 3.98 746 111%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 632 101% 35 5 22 95% 627 3,363 4.77 705 112% 2,518 3.41 738 118% 3,091 3.98 777 124%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 675 92% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,995 4.77 837 114% 3,047 3.41 894 122% 2,848 3.98 716 98%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 279 55% 32 5 22 85% 505 2,470 4.77 518 103% 2,338 3.41 686 136% 2,121 3.98 533 106%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 679 125% 30 4 22 95% 543 4,623 4.77 969 178% 3,027 3.41 888 163% 2,925 3.98 735 135%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 715 101% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,287 4.77 899 126% 3,041 3.41 892 125% 3,545 3.98 891 125%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 450 75% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,570 4.77 749 125% 2,301 3.41 675 113% 2,225 3.98 559 93%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 759 127% 38 6 22 85% 598 4,280 4.77 897 150% 3,217 3.41 943 158% 3,068 3.98 771 129%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 340 81% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,195 4.77 460 110% 2,401 3.41 704 168% 2,434 3.98 612 146%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 793 146% 34 5 22 85% 542 3,408 4.77 714 132% 2,267 3.41 665 123% 2,594 3.98 652 120%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 865 122% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,667 4.77 769 108% 3,040 3.41 892 125% 2,848 3.98 716 101%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 567 97% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,469 4.77 518 88% 2,514 3.41 737 126% 1,951 3.98 490 84%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 677 108% 35 5 22 95% 627 2,723 4.77 571 91% 2,456 3.41 720 115% 3,357 3.98 844 135%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 911 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 4,951 4.77 1,038 150% 3,483 3.41 1,021 148% 3,645 3.98 916 132%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 672 103% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,159 4.77 872 133% 2,997 3.41 879 134% 2,807 3.98 705 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 314 84% 24 4 22 85% 374 3,595 4.77 754 202% 2,375 3.41 696 186% 2,080 3.98 523 140%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 866 115% 42 6 22 95% 752 3,779 4.77 792 105% 3,211 3.41 942 125% 2,782 3.98 699 93%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 676 100% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,292 4.77 900 134% 2,962 3.41 869 129% 3,561 3.98 895 133%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 914 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 2,881 4.77 604 87% 2,579 3.41 756 109% 2,519 3.98 633 91%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 293 70% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,059 4.77 432 103% 2,238 3.41 656 157% 2,647 3.98 665 159%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 906 167% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,738 4.77 574 106% 2,507 3.41 735 136% 2,322 3.98 584 108%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 302 85% 20 3 22 95% 355 2,470 4.77 518 146% 2,447 3.41 718 202% 1,941 3.98 488 137%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 299 75% 23 4 22 95% 397 1,906 4.77 400 101% 2,377 3.41 697 176% 2,278 3.98 572 144%
165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,026 177% 36 5 22 85% 580 5,127 4.77 1,075 185% 3,045 3.41 893 154% 2,852 3.98 717 124%
147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 702 116% 34 5 22 95% 606 3,572 4.77 749 124% 2,501 3.41 734 121% 2,442 3.98 614 101%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 481 89% 34 5 22 85% 542 4,045 4.77 848 156% 3,013 3.41 884 163% 2,816 3.98 708 130%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 860 108% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,759 4.77 788 99% 3,052 3.41 895 113% 2,747 3.98 690 87%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 380 78% 30 4 22 85% 486 2,876 4.77 603 124% 2,259 3.41 662 136% 2,647 3.98 665 137%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 783 101% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,567 4.77 957 124% 3,393 3.41 995 129% 3,330 3.98 837 108%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 336 82% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,086 4.77 437 106% 2,985 3.41 875 213% 2,130 3.98 535 130%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 740 136% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,643 4.77 554 102% 2,421 3.41 710 131% 2,877 3.98 723 133%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 263 70% 24 4 22 85% 374 2,734 4.77 573 153% 2,323 3.41 681 182% 1,468 3.98 369 99%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 904 146% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,148 4.77 870 141% 7,853 3.41 2,303 373% 3,560 3.98 894 145%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 687 102% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,189 4.77 878 130% 3,075 3.41 902 134% 3,757 3.98 944 140%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 894 116% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,849 4.77 1,017 131% 3,067 3.41 899 116% 3,542 3.98 890 115%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0% 17 3 22 95% 293 1,307 4.77 274 94% 2,995 3.41 878 300% 1,468 3.98 369 126%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 520 107% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,220 4.77 675 139% 2,412 3.41 707 146% 2,986 3.98 750 154%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 864 144% 37 5 22 85% 598 4,158 4.77 872 146% 3,295 3.41 966 161% 3,467 3.98 871 146%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 618 100% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,363 4.77 915 148% 9,153 3.41 2,684 435% 2,882 3.98 724 117%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 617 118% 29 4 22 95% 522 2,761 4.77 579 111% 3,069 3.41 900 172% 2,282 3.98 573 110%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 662 126% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,991 4.77 837 160% 3,022 3.41 886 169% 3,546 3.98 891 170%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0% 23 - 18 95% 393 2,982 4.77 625 159% NA 3.41 NA NA 2,148 3.98 540 137%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 342 108% 20 3 22 85% 318 2,287 4.77 479 151% 2,398 3.41 703 221% 1,637 3.98 411 129%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 123 60% 13 2 22 85% 206 2,309 4.77 484 235% 2,336 3.41 685 333% 1,762 3.98 443 215%
174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,044 147% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,714 4.77 779 110% 3,056 3.41 896 126% 2,818 3.98 708 100%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 564 97% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,959 4.77 620 107% 2,399 3.41 704 121% 3,028 3.98 761 131%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 366 103% 22 3 22 85% 355 2,599 4.77 545 153% 2,484 3.41 728 205% 2,625 3.98 660 186%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 407 99% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,825 4.77 592 144% 2,259 3.41 662 161% 3,149 3.98 791 192%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 572 78% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,683 4.77 772 106% 3,064 3.41 898 123% 4,017 3.98 1,009 138%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 494 88% 35 5 22 85% 561 2,987 4.77 626 112% 2,376 3.41 697 124% 2,952 3.98 742 132%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 556 114% 31 5 22 85% 486 2,992 4.77 627 129% 2,812 3.41 825 170% 1,962 3.98 493 101%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 918 140% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,721 4.77 990 151% 2,638 3.41 773 118% 3,706 3.98 931 142%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 834 124% 42 6 22 85% 673 3,851 4.77 807 120% 3,051 3.41 895 133% 3,363 3.98 845 126%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 728 130% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,040 4.77 637 114% 2,500 3.41 733 131% 2,923 3.98 734 131%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 601 115% 33 5 22 85% 524 2,565 4.77 538 103% 2,322 3.41 681 130% 2,348 3.98 590 113%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,096 209% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,120 4.77 864 165% 2,580 3.41 757 145% 2,319 3.98 583 111%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 740 158% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,534 4.77 741 158% 2,534 3.41 743 159% 3,036 3.98 763 163%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 339 58% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,618 4.77 549 95% 2,740 3.41 804 139% 2,714 3.98 682 118%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 329 72% 26 4 22 95% 460 2,894 4.77 607 132% 2,217 3.41 650 141% 2,703 3.98 679 148%
44,905 48,738 47,366
Cafeteria = 4,500 SF / 1,100 Students Gym = 13,400 SF / 1,100 Students Library = 4,800 SF / 1,100 Students
Classroom Capacity 4.10 SF per Student 12.18 SF per Student 4.36 SF per Student
Average
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity 12.18 SF Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 4.10 SF per based on Café / Gym Area per based on Gym / Library 4.36 SF per based on Library /
LOC Middle Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 997 85% 56 0 28 75% 1,176 4,752 4.10 1,159 99% 13,668 12.18 1,122 95% 4,013 4.36 920 78%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,171 124% 48 0 28 70% 941 6,348 4.10 1,548 165% 11,555 12.18 949 101% 3,657 4.36 839 89%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,163 112% 53 0 28 70% 1,039 5,765 4.10 1,406 135% 11,877 12.18 975 94% 3,243 4.36 744 72%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 922 82% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,461 4.10 1,088 82% 13,935 12.18 1,144 86% 4,044 4.36 928 70%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 709 79% 46 0 28 70% 902 4,790 4.10 1,168 130% 11,388 12.18 935 104% 3,553 4.36 815 90%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 898 83% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,452 4.10 1,330 123% 13,196 12.18 1,083 101% 4,127 4.36 947 88%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 801 66% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 5,220 4.10 1,273 105% 15,986 12.18 1,312 108% 4,666 4.36 1,070 88%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 943 71% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,669 4.10 1,139 86% 15,396 12.18 1,264 96% 5,616 4.36 1,288 97%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 563 42% 80 0 28 70% 1,568 4,433 4.10 1,081 69% 12,344 12.18 1,013 65% 4,499 4.36 1,032 66%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 554 55% 48 0 28 75% 1,008 6,725 4.10 1,640 163% 10,575 12.18 868 86% 3,665 4.36 841 83%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,070 133% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,022 4.10 981 122% 11,740 12.18 964 120% 2,983 4.36 684 85%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,224 101% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 4,501 4.10 1,098 90% 13,699 12.18 1,125 93% 4,044 4.36 928 76%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,187 107% 53 0 28 75% 1,113 4,879 4.10 1,190 107% 11,857 12.18 974 87% 3,413 4.36 783 70%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 764 81% 45 0 28 75% 945 5,199 4.10 1,268 134% 10,628 12.18 873 92% 3,147 4.36 722 76%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,123 97% 59 0 28 70% 1,156 5,953 4.10 1,452 126% 12,775 12.18 1,049 91% 2,798 4.36 642 55%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 683 63% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,057 4.10 1,234 114% 13,147 12.18 1,079 100% 4,293 4.36 985 91%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0% 44 0 28 75% 924 5,272 4.10 1,286 139% 11,751 12.18 965 104% 5,046 4.36 1,157 125%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 873 70% 59 0 28 75% 1,239 6,244 4.10 1,523 123% 13,899 12.18 1,141 92% 3,142 4.36 721 58%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 692 86% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,348 4.10 1,061 132% 12,023 12.18 987 123% 4,399 4.36 1,009 126%
20,417 16,154 16,337
Cafeteria = 9,000 SF / 2,400 Students Gym = 20,720 SF / 2,400 Students Library = 8,400 SF / 2,400 Students
Classroom Capacity 3.75 SF per Student 8.63 SF per Student 3.50 SF per Student
Average School School School
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 3.75 SF per based on Café / Gym Area 8.63 SF per based on Gym / Library 3.50 SF per based on Library /
LOC High Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,076 128% 114 0 28 75% 2,394 10,935 3.75 2,916 122% 21,471 8.63 2,488 104% 8,371 3.50 2,392 100%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,912 95% 113 0 28 75% 2,373 8,178 3.75 2,181 92% 17,068 8.63 1,978 83% 9,864 3.50 2,818 119%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,964 89% 105 0 28 75% 2,205 10,074 3.75 2,686 122% 17,488 8.63 2,026 92% 5,977 3.50 1,708 77%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,594 102% 142 0 28 75% 2,982 9,200 3.75 2,453 82% 22,036 8.63 2,553 86% 9,862 3.50 2,818 94%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,927 89% 103 0 28 75% 2,163 8,955 3.75 2,388 110% 17,050 8.63 1,976 91% 7,671 3.50 2,192 101%
EMHSJC /
19/20/29 International 1,548 894 58% 1,310 85% 79 0 28 70% 1,548 8,952 3.75 2,387 154% 16,419 8.63 1,903 123% 6,106 3.50 1,745 113%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0% 18 0 28 75% 378 1,834 3.75 489 129% 2,282 8.63 264 70% 1,223 3.50 349 92%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 2,037 125% 83 0 28 70% 1,627 13,513 3.75 3,603 221% 23,465 8.63 2,719 167% 7,677 3.50 2,194 135%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,110 60% 94 0 28 70% 1,842 8,026 3.75 2,140 116% 18,936 8.63 2,194 119% 8,856 3.50 2,530 137%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,343 84% 76 0 28 75% 1,596 6,244 3.75 1,665 104% 15,765 8.63 1,827 114% 6,981 3.50 1,994 125%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,597 101% 81 0 28 70% 1,588 8,600 3.75 2,293 144% 22,180 8.63 2,570 162% 6,226 3.50 1,779 112%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,994 107% 95 0 28 70% 1,862 9,462 3.75 2,523 136% 14,870 8.63 1,723 93% 7,017 3.50 2,005 108%
21,698 20,512 20,864
% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC Elementary Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
142 Allan 673 379 56% 354 53%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 585 120%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 692 142%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 557 83%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 891 112%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 955 172%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 203 81%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 226 43%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 288 48%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 630 99%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 896 150%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 478 64%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 456 78%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 441 103%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 525 112%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 312 115%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 367 70%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 763 107%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 731 109%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 837 100%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,252 223%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 707 106%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 573 91%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 666 91%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 276 55%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 728 134%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 689 97%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 452 76%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 825 138%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 325 78%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 755 139%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 888 125%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 599 102%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 714 114%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 897 130%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 706 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 329 88%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 883 117%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 687 102%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 895 129%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 308 74%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 956 176%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 300 84%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 284 72%
% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC Middle Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 979 83%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,219 130%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,170 113%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 905 80%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 719 80%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 850 79%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 829 68%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 989 75%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 541 41%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 583 58%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,056 131%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,266 104%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,171 105%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 804 85%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,165 101%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 712 66%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 876 71%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 731 91%
20,417 16,154 16,565
% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC High Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,092 129%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,962 97%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,958 89%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,606 103%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,883 87%
EMHSJC /
19/20/29 International 1,548 894 58% 1,249 81%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 1,981 122%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,083 59%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,316 82%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,552 98%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,902 102%
21,698 20,512 20,584
Appendix C
Visioning Workshop Summary
Page 207
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD
Facility Master Plan
Visioning Workshop
Page 208
EXHIBIT "B"
Acknowledgements
Cuningham Group Architecture P.A., as a consultant to DeJONG-RICHTER, prepared this document with
the support and assistance of the following Facility Master Plan Vision Workshop participants:
Other Participants
Pat Rossett AISD – Assistant Director Bond Services
Carolyn Staskiewicz DeJONG-RICHTER
Eric Sheppard Magellan Inc
Steven Kapeller BLGY Architecture
Benny Hawkins BLGY Architecture
Meg Parsons Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.
Tim Dufault Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.
Page 209
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Table of Contents
Introduction
Day One
A. Greatest Hopes
B. Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson
C. Issues & Assets
D. Provocation II: School of One
E. I See…We See…
F. Facility Master Plan Vision Statement
G. Provocation III: Environment Matters
H. Values: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Review
I. Story Time
Day Two
A. Reflections
B. Provocation III: John A. Johnson
C. Facility Principles
Appendices
A. Day One Presentation
B. Day Two Presentation
C. Final Presentation
D. Photos
Page 210
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Introduction
This document is the result of a Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop held May 13th & 14th, 2010 with
participants from the Austin Independent School District and the community. The purpose of this workshop
was to create a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement and Facility Principles.
The purpose of a Facility Master Plan is to create a clear and compelling vision of the future for AISD,
aligning facilities with learning. A Facility Master Plan Vision Statement creates a filter by which future
decisions can be made and Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all
schools in AISD.
The process used during the Visioning Workshop was interactive and included “Provocations” and small
and whole group work. The following is a summary of our work during both days.
Page 211
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Greatest Hopes:
Day one started with participants sharing their Greatest Hopes for the Facility Master Planning process.
Below are some of the hopes shared by participants:
Page 212
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 213
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 214
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
The group watched a video on the School of One, a program that started the summer of 2009, in New York
City.
“The mission of School of One is to provide students with personalized, effective, and dynamic classroom
instruction so that teachers have more time to focus on the quality of their instruction.
To achieve this mission, School of One re-imagines the traditional classroom model. Instead of one teacher
and 25-30 students in a classroom, each student participates in multiple instructional modalities, including a
combination of teacher-led instruction, one-on-one tutoring, independent learning, and work with virtual
tutors.
To organize this type of learning, each student receives a unique daily schedule based on his or her
academic strengths and needs. As a result, students within the same school or even the same classroom
can receive profoundly different instruction as each student‟s schedule is tailored to the skills they need and
the ways they best learn. Teachers acquire data about student achievement each day and then adapt their
live instructional lessons accordingly
By leveraging technology to play a more essential role in planning instruction, teachers have more time to
focus on doing what they do best - delivering quality instruction and ensuring that all students learn.”
Page 215
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
To start the visioning process we asked participants to „imagine it‟s 10 years out, the AISD Facility Master
Plan has given the district amazing learning places that reflect the community and help the district
accomplish its mission. People visit because its facilities are so successful in accomplishing the goals of
the District. Imagine you‟re giving someone a tour – what do you see?‟
Page 216
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 217
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Social skills training as part the degree program (such as mediation training)
Flex schedules for students in high school
Young children given the time and opportunity to learn through play
Access to all resources within a school for every student
Curriculum that is differentiated to fit individuals needs and flexible schedules to allow the best use of time
Secondary classrooms that allow for small group work (not just rows of chairs)
A flower bed at the entrance of school, there are trees that have been pruned, and doors have been painted recently
and rooms are brightly painted, there are posters on the walls along with student work. The facilities reflect attention to
detail
As we enter the library, there is a bank of computers and students working in small groups accessing databases from
around the world. The students are engaged and the noise level is amazingly semi quiet.
Technology driven learning in every classroom in AISD facility
Language development academy, producing fluent 2nd and 3rd language proficiency
Fine arts integrated with academics integrated with social learning
Music academy generating music professionals, singers, etc.
Spaces that are student/teacher friendly
Teachers interacting with students
Community advocate centers/service for students and family members
Learning centers for 0 to 4-year olds
All students actively involved in learning
Collaboration between AISD and ACC that produces HS graduates interested in graduation with certificates in medical
technology, nursing, construction, etc…
Central headquarters reduced in physical size, in more compact, effective structure
Substantial revenue generated from space use that can be reinvested into important programming
Private and corporate donation to AISD foundation in excess of $50 million
Number-one rated HS in the country in Austin due to technology or live music/jazz, band or other with an awesome
facility/stages, media rooms, etc…
I See Wordle
www.wordle.net
Page 218
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
In small groups participants then shared these I See… statements and created We See… statements.
Listed below are the We see… statements worked on by participants in small groups. These became the
basis of the Vision Statement.
We see…..
An overall environment that is both encouraging and engaging
Purposeful, functional, modular facilities that serve all students needs
Facilities “co-purposed” for student and community usage
Teachers totally focused on education and innovation
Students in a variety of learning environments with technology support, integrated to ensure development
of individual learning styles and goals, supported by community partnerships on an ongoing basis (24/7)
Facilities that are inviting, welcoming, flexible enough to accommodate and support a variety of instructional
arrangements and incorporates:
instructional technology
family and community access to information
teacher access to information and resources
Environment: small group instruction spaces, flower beds, natural light, storage areas and no portable
buildings (beautiful physical space high quality learning is norm)
Special Programs: Single gender/ single-grade academies, partnerships with higher learning for
career/vocational skill development, family resource centers, fine arts, language academies and early
childhood centers
Revenue: Space used (for partnerships, co-locations in underutilized space) Private and corporate gifts –
Austin-based celebrities
Page 219
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 220
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Revised Version:
Page 221
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
As a part of the process of thinking about the future of Austin schools, the group looked at learning styles,
the learning environment and current examples of what other districts are doing with their facilities. Below
are examples of what was discussed. The presentation is included in the May 13th presentation in the
appendix of this document.
14
Page 222
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Values
Building on the work that has already been done in the District we reviewed the Austin ISD Strategic Plan
and expanded on the Values contained in the Plan:
Page 223
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 224
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 225
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Story Time
As a way to think more about how learning will happen in the future and what role the facilities play,
participants were asked to work in small groups and answer the following question:
Imagine it is 2020 and AISD has met its strategic plan goals for 2015 and has addressed many of the key
facility needs as defined in the Facility Master Plan of 2010.
Imagine you are (a student, a community member, a teacher, a staff member) Describe your typical day in
an AISD school – what does your day look like?
1. What are you doing? What is the process of learning and what are the outcomes or expectations?
2. Who are you with? How is your day organized?
3. What is your environment like? Where are you and how do you feel?
4. What makes AISD a special place to learn?
Page 226
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
To start off Day Two the group reflected on Day One and on a video assigned as homework:
Dave Eggers‟ Wish: Once Upon a School.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html
Page 22
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
"Schools as Centers of Community: John A. Johnson Achievement Plus Elementary School” is a video
case study and discussion guide that assists local leaders and residents in creating constructive,
meaningful dialogue on the importance of good school design and ways schools can become centers
of their communities. KnowledgeWorks Foundation partnered with the American Architectural
Foundation to create the guide and video.
Video link:
http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm
Page 228
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Principles
Starting with the Austin ISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Strategies, participants worked in small groups to
define Facility Principles. Facility Principles are overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in
the Austin Independent School District.
For each of the Strategies groups defined what this meant for facilities. So, for example, if the Austin ISD is
committed to an engaging/healthy experience for all students, this means what in terms of facilities.
Page 229
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Facility Principles
This means…
• All schools will have a space identified to engage parents and be responsive to student needs
(learning/language/cultural/socioeconomic)
• All schools will have spaces dedicated to active learning and diverse learning styles
• All schools will be equipped to provide technology resources in classrooms and other learning
areas
• Create and maintain clean and attractive grounds that encourage physical activities
• Provide safe entry and exit for cyclists, walkers, skateboarders, etc.
• Develop spaces that promote social and recreational interaction
• Common areas for active, hands-on group activities
• Coordinate and cooperate with other entities (YMCA, YWCA, Parks & Recreation) to share and/or
build new facilities (pools, gyms, parks)
• All schools will have good indoor air quality, climate control, and day-lighting
• Our facilities will support high quality, rigorous, well rounded learning
Page 230
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Principles
This means…
• Community hubs for services and programs
• Flexible spaces and hours to accommodate changes in learning styles, instructional delivery
supported by technological resources for students, families and communities
• Facilities to provide learning spaces that support student collaboration, teamwork and relationship
building
Page 231
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Facility Principles
This means…
• AISD facility decisions promote long-term value
• AISD facilities should be equitable and adequate across the district
• AISD staff and community must have input into facility decisions to ensure adequate resources
(examples: space, storage, technology, outlets)
• AISD facilities to provide high quality professional development spaces
• AISD facilities must provide an appropriate environment for staff effectiveness (example: HVAC,
light, acoustics, security)
• AISD facilities must include adequate, flexible-use core facilities (library, gym, cafeteria)
• AISD staff must have appropriate access to various spaces to meet student needs of a high quality
rigorous educational experience
Page 232
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Facility Principles
This means…
• Leverage Austin public and private resources for more effective and efficient use of existing and
new facilities by:
• Revisit efficiency study
• Align decisions with fiscal impact statement
• “CAN” concept (Community Action Network) to engage various public entities (e.g. UT, ACC,
Travis County, Seton, St. David‟s, etc…) for purpose of repurposing facilities including charters and
co-location
• Must at least break even or generate revenue
• Strategy for maintenance and operations to support facilities and address deferred, routine, and
preventative maintenance
• Develop detailed capital plan schedule/report that includes budget/actuals/completion dates and M
& O impact by project
• CAN concept must be integrated into bond planning process to address shared facilities and a
more comprehensive set of services
• Develop strategic partnerships to obtain private donations /endowments in excess of $50 million
Page 233
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 234
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Appendices
Contained on the following pages are the presentations from both days.
Page 235
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 236
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 237
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 238
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 239
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 240
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 241
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 242
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 243
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 244
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 245
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 246
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 247
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 248
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 249
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 250
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 251
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 252
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 253
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 254
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 255
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 256
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 257
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 258
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 259
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 260
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 261
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 262
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 263
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 264
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 265
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 266
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 267
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 268
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 269
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 270
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 271
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 272
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 273
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 274
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 275
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 276
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 277
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 278
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 279
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 280
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 281
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 282
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 283
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 284
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 285
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 286
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 287
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 288
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 289
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 290
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 291
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 292
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 293
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 294
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 295
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 296
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 297
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 298
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 299
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop
Page 300
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD
Page 301
EXHIBIT "B"
Appendices D, E, and F
Appendix D: Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E: Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F: Community Meeting #3 Results
Due to the volume of these reports, see the following link to access this information:
http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4
Page 302
EXHIBIT "B"
Appendix G
Summary of Facility Options Discussed by the FMPTF
Page 303
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Cut all bus service for magnet schools and signature
0.1 programs $1,994,516
Redraw boundaries for the entire district with the
0.2 greatest weight on vertical alignment Unknown Unknown $0
Move International HS from Eastside HS to ALC. Relocate
ALC students to Blackshear ES. Move Blachsear ES
0.4 students to Zavala ES Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Allan ES as a Pre-K thru 8 and move Allison ES
attendance area middle school students from Martin MS
0.5 to Allan Pre-K-8 Unknown $0 $0
Page 304
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Build a new middle school - Southeast (land funded from
0.18 previous bond) $0 $0 $55,700,000
Build a new high school - South (land funded from
0.19 previous bond) $0 $0 $106,600,000
0.20 School for Young Men
Page 305
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Page 306
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Close Barton Hills ES and Zilker ES and move students to
4.4B Becker ES and Dawson ES. $2,266,637 $17,543,935 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students
4.5 into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Joslin ES and move students into
4.6 Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,367,541 $13,360,266 $0
Page 307
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Close Webb MS and repurpose school as a School for
8.4 Young Men ($98,844) $0 $0
Reassign a portion of Bedichek MS population to
9.1 Covington MS ($28,677) $0 $0
Adjust boundary between Bedichek MS and Covington
9.2 MS ($234,298) $0 $0
Page 308
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Page 309