You are on page 1of 311

EXHIBIT "B"

Austin Independent School District


District-Wide Facility Master Plan
March 2011
EXHIBIT "B"

As a planning team we appreciate the opportunity to serve the Austin Independent School District.

DeJONG-RICHTER LLC
Magellan Consulting
Cuningham Group
BLGY Architecture
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 5

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6


Facility Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................. 10
Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation......................................................................................................................... 13
Estimated Budget ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15

Area Facility Options ....................................................................................................................................................................... 16

Additional Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 32
Policy Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................................ 32
Management Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................... 33
Staffing Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................................... 33
Energy Efficiency Recommendations ...................................................................................................................................... 34
Maintenance Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................ 34
Design Recommendations........................................................................................................................................................ 35
Safety and Security Recommendations .................................................................................................................................. 35
Use Recommendations ................................................................................................................................................................... 36
Technology Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 36
Other Recommendations ......................................................................................................................................................... 37

Facility Summary Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations ..................................................................................... 38


Elementary Schools (Alpha) ............................................................................................................................................................ 39
Middle Schools (Alpha) ................................................................................................................................................................. 119
High Schools (Alpha)...................................................................................................................................................................... 138
Special Schools (Alpha)................................................................................................................................................................. 151
Support Facilities (Alpha)............................................................................................................................................................... 154

Educational Framework ....................................................................................................................................................................... 165


Planning Guidelines ...................................................................................................................................................................... 165
Programmatic Considerations .................................................................................................................................................... 166

Enrollment Projections ................................................................................................................................................................... 169


Historical Enrollment ...................................................................................................................................................................... 169
Birth Data........................................................................................................................................................................................ 175
Projected Enrollment .................................................................................................................................................................... 176
Page 1
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Capacity Analysis.......................................................................................................................................................................... 178

Utilization ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 180

Facility Condition Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................ 184


Educational Adequacy Assessment ............................................................................................................................................ 186
Building Deficiencies ...................................................................................................................................................................... 187

Facility Options .............................................................................................................................................................................. 189


Criteria .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 189

Appendices
Appendix A ........................................................................................................................ FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts
Appendix B...................................................................................................................................................Facility Capacity Charts
Appendix C .........................................................................................................................................Visioning Workshop Summary
Appendix D .................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E ..................................................................................................................................... Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F ............................................................................................................................... Community Meeting #3 Comments
Appendix G ............................................................................................................. Summary of Facility Options Discussed by FMPTF
Appendix H.................................................................................................................................................................... Glossary of Terms

Page 2
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our appreciation to the Austin Independent School District Board of Trustees for its commitment
to the Facility Master Planning Process. We realize that the recommendations contained within the plan will create
challenges for the community in the months and years to come. With the support of the school district and community
members, the Austin Independent School District can continue its mission to provide a comprehensive educational
experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to society.

Board of Trustees
Mark Williams, District 5, President
Vincent M. Torres, District 4, Vice President
Lori Moya, District 6, Secretary
Cheryl Bradley, District 1
Sam Guzman, District 2
Christine Brister, District 3
Robert Schneider, District 7
Annette LoVoi, At-Large Position 8
Tamala Barksdale, At-Large Position 9

Austin Independent School District


Dr. Meria Carstarphen, Superintendent of Schools
Lawrence Fryer, Chief Operations Officer
Paul Turner, Executive Director of Facilities
Curt Shaw, Director of Construction Management
Pat Rossett, Assistant Director of Bond Planning
Joe Silva, Assistant Director of Planning
Beth Wilson, Project Facilitator

Page 3
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Facility Master Plan Task Force


We take this opportunity to acknowledge the Facility Mater Plan Task Force for its efforts in guiding the planning process.
We thank the members for their dedication and commitment to this process that resulted in the development of the
facility plan for Austin Independent School District.

Co-Chairs: Richard Frazier


Janet Mitchell

John Alawneh Kelly Evans Susan Moffat


Larry Amaro Frances Vicki Everett Chris Moore
Adolphus Anderson Rene Garganta Audrea Moyers
Evelyn Andrews Greg Goodman Beth Orta
Tony Arnold Annette Gregory Mark Penniman
Frederick Bentley Zoe Griffith Elizabeth Polk
Sally Brackett Silas Griggs Jacqueline Porter
Chris Carrillo-Spano Janis Guerrero Pete Price
Jacqueline Chatham Kris Hafezizadeh Douglas Rhodenbaugh
Tommy Cox Bergeron Harris John Rocha
Joey Crumley Anne M. Heinen Michelle Rusnak
Bill De Dufour Heath Hignight Dave Sanders
Julie Delgado Lawrence P. Huang Curt Shaw
Janet Dewey Linda Johnson David W. Sullivan
Elizabeth Dickey Bob King Kathie Tovo
Dan Diehl J. Laverne Morris-Parker Laura Tuma
Freddie B. Dixon, Sr. Lucia Markert Paul Turner
Martha Dolman Carolyn Merritt Texanna Turner
Jim Evans Adelina Miller Chad Williams
Paul Mitchell

Page 4
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Introduction
Facility Master Plan Vision Statement

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement and support common community goals through
equitable, inviting facilities that integrate technology and are optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and
meet highest educational adequacy standards.

The Austin Independent School District is committed to The facility master planning process is a proactive
providing high quality and challenging educational approach to explore long- and short-term academic
experiences for all students who are enrolled in its and facility options and solutions. Among the most
schools. To ensure this commitment, the District important components contributing to the success of the
developed the AISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan. As part of plan is the involvement and input gathered from Austin
Strategy #4 of that plan, key steps 4.5 and 4.7 included community members.
development of a long-range facility master plan as
follows. The recommendations contained within will serve as the
basis from which Austin Independent School District
Strategy #4 – align resources to accomplish priorities facilities will be transformed into a new generation of
within a balanced budget schools that accommodates educational needs today
and in the future. The final Austin Independent School
4.5 Develop and implement long-range plans for District Facility Master Plan will serve as a road map that
facilities, transportation, libraries and technology will address facility conditions, an implementation
that align infrastructure with the district’s timeframe, and project costs.
educational plan

4.7 Ensure efficiency and efficacy of existing


facilities before investing in new facilities

This planning process, which is data driven, takes into


consideration enrollments, school building capacities,
educational framework, educational vision, and facility
conditions for 114 school campuses and 12 support
facilities in the District.

Page 5
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Executive Summary

District Statistics Facility Condition


AISD maintains approximately 87,000 permanent Approximately $1.1 billion in deficiencies was identified in
classroom seats and an additional 16,000 seats in the facility condition assessment, including a functional
portable/temporary buildings in 11.5 million square feet equity and ADA/TAS analysis, completed in 2010, and
of educational facilities. The enrollment for the 2010-11 the most recent educational adequacy assessment
school year was approximately 86,000 students. Based completed the summer of 2010. These deficiencies have
on the latest demographic study, enrollment is projected been categorized into the following priorities.
to continue to increase to 98,000 by 2020.
Priority 1: Currently Critical (Immediate)
 Total Enrollment 2010-2011: 85,929 Priority 2: Potentially Critical (To be corrected within one
Grades Pre-K-5: 48,167 year)
Grades 6-8: 16,577 Priority 3: Necessary / Not Yet Critical (1-2 Years)
Grades 9-12: 20,662 Priority 4: Recommended (3-5 Years)
Separate and Special Campuses: 523 Priority 5: Does Not Meet Current Code/Standards
 114 School Campuses /Grandfathered
80 Elementary Schools
19 Middle Schools Addressing Growth
12 High Schools The north central and southern areas of AISD continue to
3 Special Schools experience the most enrollment growth. The following
 12 Support Facilities new construction programs, funded by current and
previous bond programs, will help address overcrowding
Utilization issues.
By the numbers, there is an excess of 1,000 seats in
addition to the capacity in portable buildings. The reality  Baldwin ES – Opened 2010
is that there are some areas experiencing population  Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will
growth and others experiencing decline within the relieve Linder ES
District. Combined with student migration patterns,  New North Central ES – Currently in site selection
there are significantly over- and under-utilized facilities as process
a result.  New ES – Undesignated

In addition, land acquisition and funding have been


approved for a new middle school site in the

Page 6
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

southeastern part of the District, and a new high school The Facility Master Plan Task Force held 25 meetings over
site in the southern region of the District. The construction the course of 10 months and hosted 11 community
of the middle and high schools is anticipated to be a meetings. In addition, the Task Force Co-chairs attended
part of a future bond program. ten meetings at various school campuses throughout the
District. The community meetings provided invaluable
As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that input to the Task Force throughout the process. Results
three new elementary schools and additions at seven and comments from these meetings are available in the
elementary schools and one middle school would be appendix of this report.
required. Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization
rate as a precipitant for potential new construction or Challenges
additions. During the process, the Task Force was faced with
several challenges and complex issues associated with
Process AISD facilities and planning for the future. The following
In April of 2010, a Facility Master Plan Task Force was outline is meant to provide an understanding and
created and an educational planning firm was hired by reflection of the real issues with which the Task Force has
AISD in order to develop the District-wide Facility Master been struggling, and the resulting implications for facility
Plan. The Task Force, comprised of parents, community master planning.
members, teachers, principals, and AISD staff was
charged with the following tasks. Challenge #1: Accomplishing priorities within a shrinking
budget
 Monitor the process to ensure equity and fairness
across the District In order for AISD to continue operating as it is today, an
 Review and confirm recommendations and assessed budget shortfall between $94 and $100 million
resolve conflicting recommendations for fiscal year 2012 will have to be addressed. Can
 Prepare information and host community increasing facility efficiency decrease the budget
dialogues and meetings shortfall, and how can this be balanced with the future
 Review and analyze data of neighborhood schools, their design, size, and
 Review and analyze community input sustainability?
 Develop and recommend an Educational
Framework to the Board of Trustees Challenge #2: Student migration
 Develop facility options to improve efficiency and
address student needs The number of students previously living within the Austin
 Develop and recommend the district-wide Facility urban core, has declined over the past 20 years, resulting
Master Plan to the Board of Trustees in 25% of schools housing less than 85% of their
permanent student capacities. Conversely, there have

Page 7
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

been large population increases in the outer areas of the Challenge #4: Boundary adjustment solutions
District, resulting in 50% of schools housing more than
105% of their permanent student capacities. A logical solution to improve efficiencies among
overcrowded and under-utilized schools is to adjust the
However, not all under- and over-utilization is a direct attendance boundaries and assign more or fewer
result of population and demographic shifts. Large students as appropriate. In practice, it is not that simple.
numbers of students that travel outside of the boundary In some cases, under-utilization occurs when a large
of their assigned school present a challenge when number of students migrate to schools outside of their
making future facility decisions. Should long-term geographical attendance zone. Increasing the size of
planning address the number of students living within the the boundary of the under-utilized school will not fix the
attendance area, or should it address the number of problem. In addition, if the aforementioned migrating
students currently attending that school, including students decided to attend their home schools, the result
transfer students? What are the principles of the current could be an overcrowded scenario.
transfer policies and how will they be applied in the
future? In other cases, there are too many overcrowded or
under-enrolled schools adjacent to each other. This
Challenge #3: The role of facility planning in supporting results in a “domino effect” of moving students from one
and complementing educational program planning location to the other in order to increase or decrease
enrollment. In many instances, students would not be
AISD strives to maintain academic standards, programs, able to attend the school closest to their homes or in their
and performance consistently throughout the District. neighborhoods. In fact, they may have to drive past a
From a facilities perspective, what recommendations school closer to their home in order to attend another
can be made to help move the District toward school to achieve balanced enrollment.
increasing graduation rates and eliminating the
achievement gap? Since programs are capable of Challenge #5: Balancing short- and long-term needs
changing faster than bricks and mortar, how can
facilities remain flexible and be retrofitted for multi-use Significant resources will be needed to address the
where practical? How can facility decisions positively capital projects outlined in this facility plan. In addition
impact student achievement? For example, is it more to the funds needed to renovate AISD’s facility inventory,
beneficial to offer duplicate programs, such as fine arts additional investment in deferred maintenance and
or career technology education, or is it better to provide small capital projects will continue as buildings age. At
transportation to a single program? What are the cost the same time, new schools will need to be constructed
implications? to accommodate growth.

Page 8
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Test_

Page 9
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Facility Recommendations c. New North Central ES – Currently in site selection


process
I. Portable Reduction d. New ES – The Facility Master Plan Task Force
recommends locating the 2008 Bond Program
The annual cost to operate a portable building in AISD undesignated ES to the North Central area.
is approximately $4.00 per square foot. The District e. District-wide Performing Arts Center
currently has 668 portable buildings which equates to
approximately 1,336 classrooms. III. Unfunded New Construction and Capital
Improvement
The criteria used to identify portable reduction include:
 A utilization rate (enrollment/permanent a. Priority 1 & 2 Needs
capacity) at the school location that falls
below 85%. Priority 1 & 2 needs identified by the facility condition
 Age and condition of the portables assessment during 2007-2010, include currently critical
would be used to determine which and potentially critical needs at each school campus
portables to take out of service unless and support facility. The total cost to address these
their current location would cause needs is approximately $319,528,000 phased over eight
additional moving costs. years.

There is a potential to reduce the total number of b. Functional Equity


portables in the District by 108, using the above criteria
of 85% utilization. Based on a minimum annual A functional equity study was completed by the District
operating cost of $4.00 per square foot, this would during 2008-2010. This study identified core areas and
result in an annual savings of $663,552. some specialized classrooms, within specific school
campuses that did not meet the current educational
II. Funded New Construction specification standards. The cost to resolve these issues is
approximately $131,000,000, phased over eight years.
The following new construction projects, funded by
current and previous bond programs, will help address c. New Schools and Additions
some overcrowding issues.
Land acquisition and funding has been approved for a
a. Baldwin ES – Opened 2010 new middle school site in the southeastern part of the
b. Early Childhood Center – Opens 2012 and will District, and a new high school site in south Austin. The
relieve Linder ES construction of the middle and high schools is
anticipated to be a part of a future bond program.

Page 10
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

As enrollment is projected to increase, it is estimated that elementary schools and under-utilization in middle
two additional elementary schools would be required. schools.
Currently, the District targets a 125% utilization rate as a d. Explore Pre-K Centers to address overcrowding
precipitant for potential new construction or additions. e. Conduct intensive planning for School for Young
The unfunded new construction recommendations Men (site TBD based on community input,
include the following: feasibility, and availability of funding).
1. Three new elementary schools f. Conduct planning for district open-enrollment
2. Seven elementary school classroom additions signature programs and vertical team signature
3. One new middle school programs, and their equitable geographic
4. One middle school classroom addition distribution.
5. One new high school g. Complete analysis of changes to district programs
that generate facility needs.
IV. Closures/Consolidations
h. Conduct planning for Career Tech Hubs (sites TBD
based on community input, feasibility, and
Although the Task Force’s recommendations include the
availability of funding).
consideration of school closures because of the severity
of the District’s budget short fall, significant concerns i. Consider options for separating some elementary
were expressed by some members of the Task Force schools into Pre-K-3 and 4-8 grade configurations
regarding the impact of school closures on communities, to address overcrowding.
especially in those where recent gains in student
performance could be jeopardized. VI. Policy

a. Consider consolidating/closing one middle school. a. Seriously consider redrawing boundaries in most
b. Consider consolidating/closing eight elementary critically overcrowded regions where possible.
schools. b. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012 to
V. Programs Recommendations balance enrollment and improve vertical
alignment.
a. Relocate Alternative Learning Center (ALC) c. Address strict application of transfer policy as it
possibly in a different quadrant of the city . applies to overcrowding and under-utilization.
b. Identify a Pre-K-8 school (begin Pre-K-5) to relieve
VII. Operating Efficiency and Potential Revenue
north central overcrowding. Also, consider this
model in other areas of the district.
a. Do not renew administrative leases that end in
c. Consider moving 6th grade from elementary to
FY’11.
middle school to relieve overcrowding in

Page 11
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

b. Do not renew administrative leases that end in


FY’14.
c. Prepare and sell Baker Administrative Center.
d. Prepare and sell Carruth Administrative Center.
e. Expand District energy efficiency programs,
including coordinated facilities summer
shutdowns where feasible.
f. Identify additional energy efficiencies to
include in 2012 bond package.

Page 12
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Timeline for Facility Master Plan Implementation

FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Seriously consider Boundary review and Boundary review and Boundary review and
redrawing boundaries in redraw TBD redraw TBD redraw TBD
most critically overcrowded
regions where possible
Open classroom additions Open classroom additions at Open classroom addition at
at four elementary schools two elementary schools one middle school (requires
(requires future bond (requires bond future future bond funding, $4.8M)
funding, $4.8M each) funding, $4.8M each) Open classroom addition at
one elementary school
(requires future bond
funding, $4.8M)
Consider Consider
consolidating/closing one consolidating/closing four
middle school and four elementary schools
elementary schools
Preliminary planning for Proposed Bond Program Proposed Bond Program Proposed Bond Program
upcoming bond proposals Election (>$500M*) Election (TBD*) Election (TBD*)
(every 4 yrs.)

Open Linder Early Open Performing Arts Open new undesignated ES Open new undesignated ES Open new Southeast MS Open new South High
Childhood Center (2008 Center -recommended for North (requires future bond (requires future bond School (requires future bond
Bond funding available, (2008 Bond, funding Central (2008 Bond, funding funding, $24.5M) funding, $55.7M) funding, $106.6M)
$21.6M) available, $40M)_ __ available, $28.1M)__ _
Open North Central Open new undesignated ES
Elementary School (2004 (requires future bond
Bond funding available, funding, $24.5M)_________
$28.1M) Open new undesignated ES
(requires future bond
funding, $24.5M)
Relocate Alternative
Learning Center (consider
possibilities in different
quadrant of the city)
Identify pre-k-8 school Consider options for
(begin pre-k-5) to relieve separating some ES into Pk-
north central elementary 3rd and 4th – 8th to address
school overcrowding. Also, overcrowding__ _
consider this model in other Explore 3rd Pre-k center to
areas of the district. address overcrowding TBD
Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade Consider moving 6th grade
from elementary to middle from elementary to middle from elementary to middle from elementary to middle
school to relieve school to relieve school to relieve school to relieve
overcrowding and overcrowding and overcrowding and overcrowding and
underutilization underutilization underutilization underutilization
Analyze each school to Review application of
determine if limitations to transfer policy for efficacy
transfers/choice options are and fidelity
needed
Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000
In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000
*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved
by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees

Page 13
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

FY ‘12 FY ‘13 FY ‘14 FY ‘15 FY ‘16 FY ‘17 FY ‘18 FY ‘19 FY ‘20 FY ‘21

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2 Address Priority 1 and 2
renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional renovations and functional
equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements equity improvements
(requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond (requires future bond
funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding) funding)
Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction Portable reduction
Do not renew administrative Do not renew administrative
leases that finish in FY’11__ leases that finish in FY’14
Explore terminating
administrative leases that
finish in FY’14
Prepare and sell Baker
Prepare and sell CAC
Expand existing district Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to Reduce energy usage to
energy efficiency programs, 95% of baseline 90% of baseline or lower 85% of baseline or lower 80% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 75% of baseline or lower 70% of baseline or lower 65% of baseline or lower
including coordinated
facilities summer shutdowns
where feasible___________
Identify additional energy
efficiency facility needs to
include in 2012 bond
package

Programs
Intensive planning for Open School for Young Men
School for Young Men (site (if feasible and funding
TBD based on community available)
input, feasibility, availability
of funding)
Planning for district open-
enrollment signature
programs, and vertical team
signature programs and
their equitable geographic
distribution_____________
Complete analysis of
changes to district programs
that generate facilities
needs
Planning for Career Tech Open Career Tech Hubs
Hubs (locations and funding (1 north, 1 south)
sources TBD)

Note: In 2015-16 projected student enrollment > 92,000


In 2020-21 projected student enrollment > 98,000
*The Bond Program will focus on Priority 1 and 2 building systems renovations, functional equity improvements, and new schools as indicated by demographic projections and the recommendations of a Bond Advisory Committee that are approved
by the Board of Trustees. The specific dates and total bond election amounts must be approved by the Board of Trustees.

Page 14
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Estimated Budget

The following tables provide an estimated budget, including estimated costs or savings by year, for the facility
recommendations. The estimated costs or savings are based on AISD budgeted operating costs and recently completed
facility evaluations.
FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 TOTAL

I. Operational Cost Savings


Portable Reductions $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (6,000,000)
Total Cost / (Savings) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (600,000) $ (6,000,000)

II. Funded New Construction


Early Childhood Center $ - $ 21,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 21,600,000
New North Central ES $ - $ - $ 28,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,100,000
Performing Arts Center $ - $ - $ 40,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 40,000,000
New ES (North Central) $ - $ - $ - $ 28,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 28,100,000
Total Cost / (Savings) $ - $ 21,600,000 $ 68,100,000 $ 28,100,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 117,800,000

III. Un-Funded New Construction and Capital Improvements


Priority 1 & 2 Needs $ - $ - $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 39,941,000 $ 319,528,000
Functional Equity $ - $ - $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 16,350,000 $ 130,800,000
New Schools
New ES $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000
New ES $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000
New ES $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 24,500,000
New MS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,700,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 55,700,000
New HS $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 106,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 106,600,000
Additions
4 ES Classroom Additions $ - $ 19,200,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 19,200,000
2 ES Classroom Additions $ - $ - $ 9,600,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 9,600,000
1 ES Classroom Addition $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000
1 MS Classroom Addition $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,800,000
Total Cost / (Savings) $ - $ - $ 75,491,000 $ 114,891,000 $ 90,391,000 $ 111,991,000 $ 162,891,000 $ 56,291,000 $ 56,291,000 $ 56,291,000 $ 724,528,000

Page 15
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Area Facility Options Area 6: Central – Austin HS, Travis HS, Fulmore MS,
O.Henry MS, Barton Hills ES, Becker ES, Dawson ES,
The following pages describe, outline, and Linder ES, Travis Heights ES, Zilker ES
summarize facility options by area in the District. The
District has been divided into the 10 following with a Area 7: Southwest – Bowie HS, Bailey MS, Gorzycki
map provided on the following page. MS, Small MS, Baldwin ES, Baranoff ES, Clayton ES,
Kiker ES, Mills ES, Oak Hill ES, Patton ES
Area 1: Northwest – Anderson HS, Murchison MS,
Davis ES, Doss ES, Hill ES, Summitt ES Area 8: South – Crockett HS, Bedichek MS,
Covington MS, Boone ES, Cunningham ES, Galindo
Area 2: North Central – Lanier HS, Burnet MS, Dobie ES, Joslin ES, St. Elmo ES, Sunset Valley ES, The Ann
MS, Barrington ES, Cook ES, Graham ES, Hart ES, Richards School for Young Women Leaders
McBee ES, Pillow ES, Walnut Creek ES, Wooldridge
ES, Wooten ES, Read Pre-K Center Area 9: Southeast – Mendez MS, Blazier ES, Houston
ES, Langford ES, Palm ES, Perez ES, Rodriguez ES,
Area 3: Central West – McCallum HS, Lamar MS, Widen ES
Brentwood ES, Brown ES, Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES,
Gullet ES, Highland Park ES, Lee ES, Mathews ES, Area 10: Far South – Akins HS, Paredes MS, Casey ES,
Pease ES, Reilly ES, Ridgetop ES Cowan ES, Kocurek ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES,
Pleasant Hill ES, Williams ES
Area 4: Northeast – LASA HS, LBJ HS, Reagan HS,
Garcia MS, Pearce MS, Webb MS, Andrews ES,
Blanton ES, Harris ES, Jordan ES, Maplewood ES,
Overton ES, Pecan Springs ES, Pickle ES, Winn ES

Area 5: Central East – Eastside Memorial HS, Kealing


MS, Martin MS, Allan ES, Allison ES, Blackshear ES,
Brooke ES, Campbell ES, Govalle ES, Metz ES,
Norman ES, Oak Springs ES, Ortega ES, Sanchez ES,
Sims ES, Zavala ES, Garza Independence HS,
Alternative Learning Center (ALC)

Page 16
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Page 17
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

AREA 1 – NORTHWEST  One elementary school, Davis, is in the


 Anderson High School target range of percent of permanent
 Murchison Middle School capacity (between 85% and 105%)
 Davis, Doss, Hill and Summitt elementary  The middle school, Murchison, is
schools overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
Area Issues permanent capacity)
Based on the number of students living in the area for  The high school, Anderson, is in the target
the 2010-11 school year: range of percent of permanent capacity
 The area has a slight deficiency in the (between 85% and 105%)
number of seats available at the elementary Educational Enhancement
and middle school levels. Academic Ratings:
 The number of students migrating into the Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
area is higher than the number of students Doss ES Davis ES None
migrating out of the area at all levels. Hill ES Murchison MS
 Summitt ES Anderson HS
Elementary School Capacity 2,633 Elementary Migration IN - 478
Elementary School Population 2,731 Elementary Migration OUT - 166 Future Growth
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (98) Net Migration - 312  Moderate population growth is projected in this
area in the next five years.
Middle School Capacity 1,113 Middle School Migration IN - 220 Facility Condition
Middle School Population 1,171 Middle School Migration OUT - 110  On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Mirgation - 110 Condition Index) slightly above the District FCI
(22.8%).
High School Capacity 2,017 High School Migration IN - 391 Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
High School Population 1,962 High School Migration OUT - 257  Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 55 Net Migration - 134 elementary school.
 Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
Space Utilization middle school.
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:  Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
 One elementary school, Doss, is severely improvements.
overcrowded (above 125% of permanent Community Impact
capacity)  Consult with the community regarding boundary
 Two elementary schools, Hill and Summitt, are adjustments.
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of Cost Savings
permanent capacity)  NA

Page 18
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

AREA 2 – NORTH CENTRAL Space Utilization


 Lanier High School Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the
 Burnet and Dobie middle schools area:
 Barrington, Cook, Graham, Hart, McBee,  Nine elementary schools, Barrington, Cook,
Graham, Hart, McBee, Read, Walnut Creek,
Pillow, Walnut Creek, Wooldridge, Wooten
Wooldridge and Wooten, are severely
elementary schools and Read Pre-K Center overcrowded (above 125% of permanent
Area Issues capacity)
Based on the number of students living in the area for  One elementary school, Pillow, is
the 2010-11 school year: overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
 The area has a severe deficiency in the permanent capacity)
number of seats available at the elementary  One middle school, Burnet, is in the target
school levels. range of percent of permanent
 The number of students migrating out of the capacity(between 85% and 105%), while one
area is higher than the number of students middle school, Dobie, is under enrolled
migrating in, especially at the elementary (below 85% of permanent capacity)
and high school levels.  The high school, Lanier, is in the target range
of percent of permanent capacity (between
85% and 105%)
Elementary School Capacity 5,568 Elementary Migration IN - 641 Educational Enhancement
Elementary School Population 8,370 Elementary Migration OUT - 1,587 Academic Ratings:
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (2,802) Net Migration (946)
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
Graham ES Cook ES Barrington ES
Middle School Capacity 1,941 Middle School Migration IN - 123 Pillow ES Walnut Creek ES
Hart ES
Middle School Population 1,889 Middle School Migration OUT - 333 McBee ES Wooldridge ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 52 Net Migration (210) Wooten ES Burnet MS
Dobie MS Lanier HS
High School Capacity 1,627 High School Migration IN - 121
High School Population 1,981 High School Migration OUT - 557 Future Growth
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (354) Net Migration (436)  Highest population growth in district is
projected in this area in the next five years
Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly
less than the District FCI (22.8%), with two

Page 19
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

elementary schools and one middle school AREA 3 – CENTRAL WEST


requiring more extensive renovations.  McCallum High School
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan  Lamar Middle School
 Construct two additional elementary schools.  Brentwood, Brown, Bryker Woods, Casis,
 Construct eight-classroom additions at two Gullett, Highland Park, Lee, Mathews, Reilly
elementary schools. and Ridgetop elementary schools
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity  Pease Elementary School*
improvements. Area Issues
Community Impact Based on the number of students living in the area for
 Consult with the community regarding the 2010-11 school year:
middle school redesign.
 The area has available seats at all school
 Consult with the community regarding
boundary adjustments. levels.
 The number of students migrating into the
Cost Savings
area is higher than the number of students
NA
migrating out of the area at all levels.
 Attendance zone population under 300
students at three elementary schools,
Matthews, Pease, and Ridgetop.
 There are three elementary schools, Bryker
Woods, Pease and Ridgetop that have a
permanent capacity of less than 300 seats.
 Permanent capacity for the middle and high
schools are within target ranges.
 The Fine Arts Academy at McCallum HS
results in a higher “in” migration at the high
school level.
Elementary School Capacity 4,336 Elementary Migration IN - 1,197
Elementary School Population 4,025 Elementary Migration OUT - 565
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 311 Net Migration - 632

Middle School Capacity 1,008 Middle School Migration IN - 223


Middle School Population 583 Middle School Migration OUT - 191
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 425 Net Migration - 32

High School Capacity 1,596 High School Migration IN - 795


High School Population 1,316 High School Migration OUT - 296
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - 499
Page 20
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Space Utilization Future Growth


Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the  Moderate population growth is projected in
area: this area in the next five years.
 Two elementary schools, Bryker Woods Facility Condition
and Gullett, are severely overcrowded  On average, the facilities have an FCI slightly
(above 125% of permanent capacity). higher than the District FCI (22.8%), with two
 One elementary school, Casis, is elementary schools requiring more extensive
overcrowded (between 115% and 125%
renovations.
of permanent capacity)
 Three elementary schools, Brown, Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan
Highland Park and Ridgetop, are over  Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
capacity (between 105% and 115% of improvements.
permanent capacity)  Consolidate/close one elementary school.
 Four elementary schools, Lee, Mathews Community Impact
Pease, and Reilly, are within the target  Consult with community regarding the use of
range of percent of permanent capacity closed/consolidated elementary school.
(between 85% and 105%)  Consult with community if boundary
 One elementary school, Brentwood, is adjustments are needed.
under enrolled (below 85% of permanent Cost Savings
capacity)  Cost savings for closure of one elementary
 The middle school, Lamar, is under school is $700,000 in M&O savings.
enrolled (below 85% of permanent  Capital cost avoidance –$8.1M if one
capacity) elementary school was closed / consolidated.
 The high school, McCallum, is overcrowded
*Pease Elementary School does not have an attendance boundary
(between 115% and 125% of permanent and receives transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore its
capacity) capacity, enrollment, and in-migration counts are not included in the
Educational Enhancement area summaries.
Academic Ratings:
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
Casis ES Brentwood ES Brown ES
Gullett ES Bryker Woods ES Lamar MS
Highland Park ES Reilly ES McCallum HS
Lee ES
Matthews ES
Pease ES
Ridgetop ES

Page 21
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

AREA 4 – NORTHEAST Space Utilization


 LASA, LBJ and Reagan high schools Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the
 Garcia, Pearce and Webb middle schools, area:
 Andrews, Blanton, Harris, Jordan, Maplewood,  Three elementary schools, Andrews, Harris
Overton, Pecan Springs, Pickle and Winn and Jordan, are severely overcrowded
elementary schools (above 125% of permanent capacity).
Area Issues  Four elementary schools, Maplewood,
Based on the number of students living in the area for Overton, Pecan Springs, and Pickle are
the 2010-11 school year: overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
 The area has available seats at the middle and permanent capacity).
high school levels, but is deficient at the  Two elementary schools, Blanton and Winn,
elementary school level. are within the target range of percent of
 The number of students migrating out of the permanent capacity (between 85% and
area is higher than the number of students 105%).
migrating into the area at all levels, especially at  All three middle schools, are under enrolled
the middle and high school levels. (below 85% of permanent capacity).
 The magnet program, LASA, located at LBJ High  One high school, Reagan, is under enrolled
School attracts students from outside the LBJ (below 85% of permanent capacity), while
attendance area. LBJ and LASA are within the target range of
percent of permanent capacity (between
Elementary School Capacity 4,918 Elementary Migration IN - 741 85% and 105%)
Elementary School Population 5,743 Elementary Migration OUT - 907 Educational Enhancement
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (825) Net Migration - (166) New Programs for 2011-12:
 Early College Prep at one middle school
Middle School Capacity 3,097 Middle School Migration IN - 93
 Early College High School / Early College
Start at two high schools
Middle School Population 2,272 Middle School Migration OUT - 665
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 825 Net Mirgation - (572)
Academic Ratings:
High School Capacity 3,430 High School Migration IN - 247 Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
High School Population 2,635 High School Migration OUT - 1,018 Blanton ES Andrews ES Maplewood ES
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 795 Net Migration - (771) LASA HS Harris ES Pecan Springs ES
Jordan ES Garcia MS
Overton ES Pearce MS
Pickle ES Webb MS
Winn ES LBJ HS
Reagan HS

Page 22
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Future Growth AREA 5 – CENTRAL EAST


 Significant population growth is projected in  Eastside Memorial High School at the Johnston
this area in the next five years. Campus - Global Tech. , Green Tech., and
Facility Condition International high schools
 On average, the facilities have an FCI (Facility  Kealing and Martin middle schools
Condition Index) lower than the District FCI  Allan, Allison, Blackshear, Brooke, Campbell,
(22.8%), with two elementary schools requiring Govalle, Metz, Norman, Oak Springs, Ortega,
more extensive renovations Sanchez, Sims and Zavala elementary schools
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year  Garza Independence High School* and the
Plan Alternative Learning Center (ALC)
 Construct one elementary school. Area Issues
 Construct an eight classroom addition at one Based on the number of students living in the area for
elementary school. the 2010-11 school year:
 Close /consolidate one middle school.
 The area has available seats at all school levels.
 Adjust boundaries between elementary
 The number of students migrating out of the area is
schools.
higher than the number of students migrating into
 Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
the area at the elementary and high schools levels.
improvements.
The magnet program at Kealing MS results in a
Community Impact
higher “in” migration at the middle school level.
 Consult with community regarding plans for
 Attendance zone populations are under 300
closure/consolidation of one middle school
students at three elementary schools, Blackshear,
and its repurposing.
Oak Springs and Ortega.
Cost Savings
 Permanent capacity for all schools is within target
 Cost savings for closure of one middle school is
ranges.
$1.8M in M&O savings.
 International High School provides programs for
 Capital cost avoidance –$7.4M if one middle
limited English speaking high school students who
school was closed / consolidated.
qualify.
Elementary School Capacity 6,639 Elementary Migration IN - 665
Elementary School Population 5,173 Elementary Migration OUT - 810
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 1,466 Net Migration - (145)

Middle School Capacity 2,136 Middle School Migration IN - 881


Middle School Population 1,597 Middle School Migration OUT - 493
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 539 Net Migration - 388

High School Capacity 1,548 High School Migration IN - 125


High School Population 1,249 High School Migration OUT - 955
Page 23
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 299 Net Migration - (830)
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Space Utilization Future Growth


Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the  No significant population growth is projected
area: in this area in the next five years.
 One elementary school, Allison, is over Facility Condition
capacity (between 105% and 115% of  On average, the facilities have an FCI above
permanent capacity) the District FCI (22.8%), with three elementary
 Three elementary schools, Brooke, Metz and schools and one secondary schools requiring
Sanchez, are within the target range of more extensive renovations.
percent of permanent capacity (between  There are significant structural issues at the
85% and 105%) Alternative Learning Center (ALC).
 Nine elementary schools, Allan, Blackshear, Facility Master Plan Task Force for 10-Year Plan
Campbell, Govalle, Norman, Oak Springs,  Consolidate / close four elementary schools.
Ortega, Sims and Zavala are under enrolled  Construct one replacement elementary
(below 85% of permanent capacity) school.
 One middle school, Kealing, is within the  Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
target range of permanent capacity improvements.
(between 85% and 105%), while Martin is Community Impact
under enrolled (below 85% of permanent  Consult with community to discuss use /
capacity). repurposing of elementary schools to be
 The high school, Eastside Memorial, is under closed and the relocation of ALC.
enrolled (below 85% of permanent Cost Savings
capacity).  M & O savings ($5.1M) could be realized if
Educational Enhancement four elementary schools were closed /
Academic Ratings:
consolidated.
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable  Capital cost avoidance - $25.2M if four
Metz ES Brooke ES Allan ES elementary schools were closed /
Oak Springs ES Norman ES Allison ES consolidated; however, it would cost $28M to
Ortega ES Sanchez ES Blackshear ES construct a replacement elementary school.
Sims ES Zavala ES Campbell ES
Govalle ES *Garza Independence High School and the Alternative
Unacceptable Learning Center do not have attendance boundaries and
Kealing MS
Eastside Green HS receive transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore
Martin MS
their capacity, enrollment, and in-migration counts are not
Eastside Global HS included in the area summaries.
Garza Independence HS

Page 24
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

AREA 6 – CENTRAL Space Utilization


Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the
 Austin and Travis high schools
area:
 Fulmore and O. Henry middle schools
 Two elementary schools, Barton Hills and
 Barton Hills, Becker, Dawson, Linder, Travis
Linder, are severely overcrowded (above
Heights and Zilker elementary schools
125% of permanent capacity)
Area Issues  Two elementary schools, Travis Heights and
Based on the number of students living in the area for Zilker, are over capacity (between 105% and
the 2010-11 school year: 115% of permanent capacity).
 The area has available seats at all school levels.  Two elementary school, Becker and Dawson,
 The number of students migrating into the area is are under enrolled (below 85% of permanent
higher than the number of students migrating capacity)
out of the area at the elementary and middle  One middle school, O.Henry, is overcrowded
school levels. There are slightly more students (above 125% of permanent capacity), while
migrating out of the area at the high school Fulmore is within the target range of
level. permanent capacity (between 85% and
 Attendance zone populations are under 300 105%).
students at three elementary schools, Barton Hills,  One high school, Austin, is overcrowded
Becker and Dawson. (above 125% of permanent capacity), while
 One elementary school, Barton Hills, has a Travis is under enrolled (below 85% of
permanent capacity of less than 300 seats. permanent capacity).

Elementary School Capacity 2,768 Elementary Migration IN - 729 Educational Enhancement


Elementary School Population 2,547 Elementary Migration OUT - 433 Academic Ratings:
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 221 Net Migration - 296
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
Middle School Capacity 2,023 Middle School Migration IN - 780 Barton Hills ES Linder ES Fulmore MS
Middle School Population 1,654 Middle School Migration OUT - 321 Becker ES Travis Heights ES O.Henry MS
Dawson ES Austin HS Travis HS
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 369 Net Migration - 459
Zilker ES

High School Capacity 4,067 High School Migration IN - 936


High School Population 3,860 High School Migration OUT - 1,126
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 207 Net Migration - (187)

Page 25
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Future Growth
 Moderate population growth is projected in
this area, specifically within the Linder and AREA 7 – SOUTHWEST
Travis Heights attendance zones.  Bowie High School
Facility Condition  Bailey, Gorzycki and Small middle schools
 With the exception of one elementary with a  Baldwin, Baranoff, Clayton, Kiker, Mills, Oak Hill and
high FCI, on average, the facilities have an Patton elementary schools
FCI above the the district average (22.8), Area Issues
with three elementary schools and one Based on the number of students living in the area for
middle school requiring more extensive the 2010-11 school year:
renovations.  The area has available seats at the middle school
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year Plan level, and is slightly deficient at the elementary
 Consolidate/close two elementary schools. and high schools levels.
 Address priorities 1& 2 and functional equity  The number of students migrating into the area is
improvements. higher than the number of students migrating out
Community Impact of the area at all levels.
 Consult with the community regarding the Elementary School Capacity 5,392 Elementary Migration IN - 633
use closed/consolidated elementary Elementary School Population 5,727 Elementary Migration OUT - 545
school(s). Excess / (Deficient) Seats (335) Net Migration - 88
Cost Savings
• M&O savings for two elementary schools - Middle School Capacity 3,738 Middle School Migration IN - 487
$2.2M. Middle School Population 2,844 Middle School Migration OUT - 358
• Capital cost avoidance for three elementary Excess / (Deficient) Seats 894 Net Migration - 129
schools- $17.5M.
High School Capacity 2,535 High School Migration IN - 505
High School Population 2,606 High School Migration OUT - 231
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (71) Net Migration - 274

Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Three elementary schools, Kiker, Mills and Patton,
are overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
permanent capacity)
 One elementary school, Baranoff, is over capacity
(between 105% and 115% of permanent
capacity).

Page 26
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

 Two elementary schools, Clayton and Oak Hill, are Future Growth
within the target range of percent of permanent  Moderate population growth is projected in
capacity (between 85% and 105%) this area at the elementary and middle
 One elementary school, Baldwin, is under enrolled school levels.
(below 85% of permanent capacity) Facility Condition
 One middle school, Bailey, is within the target  On average, the facilities have an FCI well
range of percent of permanent capacity below the District FCI (22.8%).
(between 85% and 105%). Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year
 Two middle schools, Gorzycki and Small are under Plan
enrolled (below 85% of permanent capacity)  Construct an eight-classroom addition at one
 One high school, Bowie, is over capacity elementary school.
(between 105% and 115% of permanent  Adjust boundaries among elementary
capacity). schools.
Educational Enhancement  Address priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
Academic Ratings: improvements.
Community Impact
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable No Rating
Baranoff ES Bailey MS None Baldwin ES
 Consult with community regarding boundary
Clayton ES Bowie HS adjustments.
Kiker ES Gorzycki MS Cost Savings
Mills ES Small MS  NA
Oak Hill ES
Patton ES

Page 27
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

AREA 8 - SOUTH under enrolled (below 85% of permanent


 Crockett High School, capacity).
 Bedichek and Covington middle schools,  One middle school, Bedichek, is over
 Boone, Cunningham, Galindo, Joslin, St. Elmo capacity (between 105% and 115% of
and Sunset Valley elementary schools permanent capacity) while Covington is
 The Ann Richards School for Young Women under enrolled (below 85% of permanent
Leaders* capacity.
Area Issues  The high school, Crockett, is under enrolled
Based on the number of students living in the area for (below 85% of permanent capacity).
the 2010-11 school year:
• The area has available seats at the Educational Enhancements
elementary and high school levels, and is Academic Ratings:
slightly deficient at the middle schools level. Exemplary Recognized Acceptable
 The number of students migrating out of the Joslin ES Boone ES Cunningham ES
area is higher than the number of students Sunset Valley ES Galindo ES Bedichek MS
migrating into the area, especially at the The Ann Richard St. Elmo ES Covington MS
middle and high school levels. School for Young Crockett HS
Women Leaders
Elementary School Capacity 3,436 Elementary Migration IN - 566
Elementary School Population 2,921 Elementary Migration OUT - 656
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 515 Net Migration - (90)
Future Growth
Middle School Capacity 2,066 Middle School Migration IN - 281  Moderate population growth projected in
Middle School Population 2,124 Middle School Migration OUT - 508 the area.
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (58) Net Migration - (227) Facility Condition
 On average, the facilities have an FCI above
High School Capacity 2,163 High School Migration IN - 285 the District FCI (22.8%) with four elementary
High School Population 1,883 High School Migration OUT - 510 schools and one middle school requiring
Excess / (Deficient) Seats 280 Net Migration - (225)
more extensive renovations.
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year
Space Utilization Plan
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:  Consolidate/close one elementary school.
 Two elementary schools, Galindo and Joslin,  Adjust boundaries between high schools
are within the target range of permanent (Akins and Crockett).
capacity (between 85% and 105%).  Address Priorities 1 & 2 and functional equity
 Four elementary schools, Boone, improvements.
Cunningham, St. Elmo and Sunset Valley, are

Page 28
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Community Impact AREA 9 – SOUTHEAST


 Consult with the community regarding  Mendez Middle School,
closure and repurposing of elementary  Blazier, Houston, Langford, Palm, Perez,
school. Rodriguez and Widen elementary schools
Cost Savings Area Issues
 Cost savings for closure of elementary school Based on the number of students living in the area for
is $1.26M in M&O savings. the 2010-11 school year:
 Capital cost avoidance –$8.4M.  The area is severely deficient in the number
of seats at the elementary level, and is slightly
*The Ann Richards School does not have an attendance boundary deficient at the middle school level.
and receives transfer students from all parts of the District, therefore its
 The number of students migrating out of the
capacity, population, and in-migration counts are not included in the
area summaries. area is higher than the number of students
migrating into the area.
Elementary School Capacity 4,637 Elementary Migration IN - 503
Elementary School Population 6,109 Elementary Migration OUT - 865
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (1,472) Net Migration - (362)

Middle School Capacity 1,215 Middle School Migration IN - 27


Middle School Population 1,266 Middle School Migration OUT - 396
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (51) Net Migration - (369)

Space Utilization
Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Four elementary schools, Blazier, Houston, Perez
and Rodriguez, are severely overcrowded (over
125% of permanent capacity).
 Two elementary schools, Langford and Widen, are
overcrowded (between 115% and 125% of
permanent capacity).
 One elementary school, Palm, is within the target
range of percent of permanent capacity
(between 85% and 105%).
 The middle school, Mendez, is under enrolled
(below 85% of permanent capacity).
 There is no high school in this area.

Page 29
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Education Enhancement AREA 10 – FAR SOUTH


Academic Ratings:  Akins High School
Acceptable
 Paredes Middle School
Exemplary Recognized
Blazier ES
 Casey, Cowan, Kocurek, Menchaca, Odom,
None Houston ES
Palm ES Langford ES Pleasant Hill and Williams elementary schools
Perez ES Rodriguez ES Area Issues
Mendez MS Based on the number of students living in the area for
Widen ES the 2010-11 school year:
 The area is deficient is the number of seats at
Future Growth the elementary and high school levels.
 Moderate population growth is projected in  The number of students migrating out of the
this area. area is higher than the number of students
Facility Condition migrating into the area, especially at the
 On average, the facilities have an FCI that is middle and high school levels.
below the District FCI (22.8%), with one Elementary School Capacity 4,286 Elementary Migration IN - 773
elementary school requiring more extensive Elementary School Population 4,819 Elementary Migration OUT - 873
renovations. Excess / (Deficient) Seats (533) Net Migration - (100)
Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year
Plan Middle School Capacity 1,156 Middle School Migration IN - 69
 Evaluate reduction of portables at middle Middle School Population 1,165 Middle School Migration OUT - 291
school. Excess / (Deficient) Seats (9) Net Migration - (222)
 Construct eight-classroom additions at two
elementary schools. High School Capacity 2,394 High School Migration IN - 176
High School Population 3,092 High School Migration OUT - 596
 Adjust boundaries among area elementary
Excess / (Deficient) Seats (698) Net Migration - (420)
schools to reduce overcrowding.
 Adjust boundaries among area middle Space Utilization
schools. Based on the 2010-11 enrollment of schools in the area:
 Address priority 1& 2 and functional equity  Three elementary schools, Cowan, Odom and
improvements Pleasant Hill, are overcrowded (between 115% and
Community Impact 125% of permanent capacity).
 Consult with the community regarding  Two elementary schools, Menchaca and Williams,
elementary and middle school boundary are over capacity (between 105% and 115%
adjustments. permanent capacity).
Cost Savings  Two elementary schools, Casey and
 NA Kocurek, are within the target range of

Page 30
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

percent of permanent capacity (between Facility Condition


85% and 105%).  On average, the facilities have an FCI below
 The middle school, Paredes, is under the District FCI (22.8%), with two elementary
enrolled (below 85% of permanent schools requiring more extensive renovations.
capacity). Facility Master Plan Task Force Options for 10-Year
 The high school, Akins, is over capacity Plan
(between 105% and 115% of permanent  Priority 1& 2 and functional equity
capacity). improvements.
 Adjust boundaries between high schools
Educational Enhancement (Akins and Crockett to reduce
Academic Ratings: overcrowding).
Exemplary Recognized Acceptable Community Impact
Cowan ES Akins HS Casey ES  Consult with community regarding high
Paredes MS Kocurek ES school boundary adjustments and possible
Menchaca ES elementary boundary adjustments.
Odom ES Cost Savings
Pleasant Hill ES  NA
Williams ES
Future Growth
 No significant population growth is projected in
the area for the elementary and middle school
levels; however, continued moderate growth is
projected at the high school level.

Page 31
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Additional Recommendations
4. Conduct campus assessments for future bond
The Facilities Master Plan Task Force recommends the work in consultation with each school's Campus
following District-wide initiatives and policy Advisory Council to ensure accurate, first-hand
recommendations. Some recommendations may knowledge of campus conditions and priorities.
require additional planning and research from other AISD For continuity, each campus will maintain a
departments and outside entities. The Task Force does Facilities Improvement Plan documenting prior
not want to lose sight of these very important ideas and campus evaluations, including a Principal's Log,
recognizes that the Facility Master Plan is a dynamic in which the principal or his/her designee will
document and should be updated periodically to record relevant discussions regarding how the
incorporate building improvements, updates in campus facilities are functioning and note any
community demographics, and changes in educational concerns for future administrators and CACs.
programming.
5. When new schools or consolidations are being
I. Policy Recommendations considered, first evaluate existing District sites
(both presently undeveloped or in use) and
1. Consider school closures only after all other determine if any are candidates for new
alternatives and options, both programmatic and construction, renovation, or re-construction. This
facilities use, have been thoroughly examined may assist the District in locating schools in better
and discussed with the affected communities. locations than can be achieved with the
purchase of new land.
2. Create a community engagement process, led
by the Superintendent and the Senior Leadership 6. Continue to identify ways to improve
Team, to work directly with the local community collaborative planning with the City of Austin.
as part of the implementation planning process. The Austin ISD, City of Austin, and Travis County
have adopted a joint resolution that specifically
3. Establish a standing committee of parents, commits these entities to collaborative planning
teachers, district staff, and other stakeholders efforts including the AISD Facility Master Plan and
(e.g., City, Chamber of Commerce, realtors) to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
track and maintain the Facility Master Plan over
time. 7. Initiate a District-wide boundary assessment and
possible realignment beginning January 2012 to

Page 32
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

balance enrollment and improve vertical


alignment. 13. Conduct a complete review of the day-to-day
application of the district's transfer policy,
8. District Departments/staff should be moved into regardless of overcrowding or underutilization.
available spaces at under-utilized schools so that Include the impact that “out migration” can have
the District may sell valuable property, avoid on under-utilized schools as much as “in migration
leasing buildings and allow for all schools to can impact overcrowded schools.
remain open.
14. Support the neighborhood school model.
9. Aggressively pursue joint-use opportunities for
existing underutilized campuses, as well as new II. Management Recommendations
facilities; potential partners include the City of
Austin, Central Health/CommUnityCare, and arts
15. Institute a well-defined system for handling
organizations and other nonprofit organizations.
maintenance requests that is communicated in
writing to all staff at the start of each school year
10. Closed schools should be reused by the District or including:
another governmental entity for office/  how and to whom to report a
administrative use, or by another educational maintenance issue, and how to receive
user, and then returned to use as AISD the estimated time for a response,
instructional space when student population  how to track a maintenance request
growth makes it prudent. electronically in real time,
 who to contact if the contractor or
11. Review current District transfer policies and maintenance person fails to arrive,
implementation, in particular using campus’  what to do if work is poorly completed or is
“permanent capacity”, as opposed to incomplete, and
“functional capacity” when evaluating available  who is responsible for signing off on
space. completed work.

12. Analyze current “out migration” trends from III. Staffing Recommendations
campus/zones to understand the underlying
issues, AND then address those issues in order to 16. Develop a plan to supervise custodians centrally
support the return of students to their to allow more flexibility in the use of resources,
neighborhood schools. reduce overtime costs through flexible

Page 33
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

scheduling, improved supervision and quality 22. Implement an educational campaign to raise or
control, and improved facility scheduling and lower thermostats in schools four degrees.
energy management. (Estimates based on examples project savings of
17. Consolidate maintenance functions, including between 5% and 20%.)
field maintenance for athletic fields, under the
Maintenance Department to provide more 23. Continue to upgrade and improve data and
efficient and flexible use of available resources. systems to measure utility usage by campus.

IV. Energy Efficiency Recommendations


V. Maintenance Recommendations
18. Implement a centrally supervised summer
custodial program to achieve cost reductions by 24. Institute bond counsel-approved strategies to
returning some custodians on each campus, designate funds for building system renovations in
through attrition, to a 10-month employment future bond programs to protect the District’s
year. capital investments.

19. Continue the current District focus on energy 25. Include furniture and equipment replacement
usage reduction through more efficient schedule in the next bond program scope of
equipment, technology applications to manage work; invest in high quality equipment that will not
the operation of buildings more effectively, and require frequent maintenance or replacement.
engagement of campus and facility occupants
to assist working toward the goal of reduced 26. Institute industry-standard performance measures
usage. for bond programs, per the 2009 MGT Efficiency
Study, to maintain and publish the following types
20. Continue efforts toward a coordinated shutdown of data: cost per foot of construction projects
of facilities in the summer months as is feasible. compared to peer districts and regional and
national averages, final estimate compared to
21. As soon as feasible, fund energy coordinator final bid, change-order rate, completion
position to implement and monitor energy schedules, consultant ratings.
savings initiatives at campuses. Savings
generated from funding this position would more
than offset the cost.

Page 34
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

VI. Design Recommendations racks for students within a two-mile radius of a


campus and outdoor space designed for multi-
27. Engage in public/private partnerships in the siting, purpose neighborhood and community use.
engineering, and design of “healthy” schools and
neighborhood environments that support 32. The site selection process for high-performance
increased outdoor physical activities for children schools and other faculties should include a
and their families. matrix that rewards the availability of mass
transportation options that include, but are not
28. Explore flexible design for future school facilities to limited to, Capital Metro buses, commuter rail,
accommodate population fluctuations. Some and metro rail to reduce transportation costs and
strategies include implementing consistent the carbon footprint of a facility.
building designs with modular components that
may expand or contract with student population 33. To avoid the costs of building and maintaining
changes, or using a Mobile Technology unit that additional high schools, pursue options such as 7
allows specialized equipment to be shared by a.m. to 8 p.m. schedules that offer challenging
two or more campuses for a portion of a year. curriculums, distance learning, and advanced
placement courses. Online courses could also be
more widely implemented and available to all
29. Create flexible learning spaces, where students
students.
can work in groups utilizing the wireless network
with portable devices.
VII. Safety and Security Recommendations
30. Design large-scale facilities to provide suitable
34. Make safe walkable routes a priority when
space for multiple uses such as conferences,
constructing or repurposing school facilities.
meetings, and professional development (ideally
in conjunction with other local governmental
partners to share costs and maintenance). 35. Assess nighttime security and add security
cameras and lighting in high need areas.
31. Design, construct and operate high-performance
schools and other facilities that are sensitive to 36. Work with appropriate entities to encourage
natural resource use, conserve energy and construction of fences and barriers at railroad
water, reduce pollution and waste, promote and crossings.
attract active transportation by healthy outdoor
design that includes, but is not limited to, bicycle

Page 35
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

37. Ensure the installation of adequate public address communication and allow people in different
and alarm systems in all schools, including all spaces to be in the same space virtually. “Green”
portables. meetings reduce employee travel time and have
a smaller carbon footprint.
38. Address campus traffic issues as identified by the
campus. 44. Institute cloud computing with anytime/anywhere
access that works with all computer types and
VIII. Use Recommendations devices.

39. Increase building rental rates to increase cost- 45. Use Web 2.0 tools to communicate, collaborate,
recovery for community use of schools. and create.

40. Appropriately consolidate students in underutilized 46. Use tools such as video “chat” to expand beyond
campuses to make available as much classroom the classroom (i.e., virtual field trips, interactions
space as possible, and issue Requests for Proposals with other students from across town, or across the
to identify educational groups or childcare globe).
providers interested in leasing excess space and
assuming or sharing maintenance and operation 47. Create a single web entry point (portal) with single
costs. sign-on for all student and teacher resources in
one place.
41. Implement an aggressive marketing campaign to
rent the Burger Activity and Delco Activity centers 48. Increase use of online assessment tools to receive
to interested parties for conferences, athletic results more quickly and reduce paper usage, i.e.,
events, and other activities. dashboards.

IX. Technology Recommendations


49. Improve access to meaningful student data to
guide instructional decisions.
42. Design “Twenty-first Century Classrooms,” media
rich classrooms with projectors, audio system,
50. Create online courses for students and teacher
document cameras, and interactive tools.
professional development which would be
conducted entirely online and blended with face-
43. Expand the staff use of online meeting software to-face and online contact.
(live video/audio/screen sharing) to facilitate

Page 36
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

51. Increase use of mobile computing (including 53. Consider the feasibility of sharing administrative
personal devices such as smart phones) and staff or resources and services among small
mobile devices (netbooks). Fewer desktop campuses.
computers (use less energy, smaller foot print,), less
need for dedicated traditional computer lab. 54. Determine cost effectiveness of duplicating
special programs in different areas of the District
X. Other Recommendations versus providing transportation to a single
program.
52. Assess administrative fees for general, sibling, or
tracking school transfers, with no fee for students
qualified for free and reduced lunch, and with
provisions for hardship waivers.

Page 37
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Facility Summary Data Reports with Facility Master Plan Recommendations

The following pages include a summary of each facility with the information listed below, in alphabetical order by school
type (ES, MS, HS). Support facilities are included subsequent to the school summaries.

 School ID number, name, and address  2015-16 Projected Attendance Zone Population
 Grades served  2010-11 In Migration
 Permanent and portable/temporary square  2010-11 Out Migration
footage  Site size and number of parking spaces
 Number of classrooms  Individual building data
 Permanent Capacity  Facility condition data
 2010-11 Enrollment  Deficiency costs by building system and priority
 2010-11 Attendance Zone Population  Facility master plan recommendations

Page 38
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

142 Allan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


4900 Gonzales Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1957 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 112,608 112,608
Area (GSF) per student 297 0 297
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 379
Utilization (by enrollment) 56% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 354 319
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 53%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 364 309 Perm Buildings 112,608 30.3%
2010-11 In Migration 057 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1957 100,939 30.3%
Building B 1 1958 10,577 35.3%
Site Data Mechanical 1 1957 1,092 27.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.5
Parking Spaces 72

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $156,255 $85,341 - $241,597 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,943,565*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $3,333 $2,797,431 $36,448 - $2,837,212
Interior - - $457,357 $323,054 - $780,411
Mechanical - $9,454 $520,512 - - $529,965
Electrical $85,828 $1,489,567 $287,683 $21,979 - $1,885,057
Plumbing $802,337 - $1,423,834 $11,768 - $2,237,939
Fire & Life Safety $141,494 $98,779 $2,617 - - $242,889
Technology - $87,750 $494,081 - - $581,831
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $369,686 $80,329 - $450,015
Other $225,024 - $136,426 - $1,074,557 $1,436,007
Total $1,254,683 $1,688,882 $6,645,881 $558,919 $1,074,557 $11,222,922
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

142
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Allan ES
Page 39
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

101 Allison Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


515 Vargas Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78741 1955 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,426 7,680 69,106
Area (GSF) per student 113 14 127
Number of Classrooms 30 9 39
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 543
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 585 -99
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 120%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 590 -104 Perm Buildings 61,426 20.4%
2010-11 In Migration 031 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 079 Building A 1 1955 61,426 21.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 61

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $2,222 $67,896 - - $70,119 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,527,749*
Roofing - - $7,992 - - $7,992
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $435 $49,328 - - $49,763
Interior - $133,897 $256,139 $115,111 - $505,146
Mechanical - $823,369 $742,003 - - $1,565,371
Electrical - $230,499 $412,417 $11,881 - $654,797
Plumbing - - $251,501 $9,629 - $261,130
Fire & Life Safety $106,267 $72,572 $2,617 - - $181,456
Technology - $91,138 $447,192 - - $538,330
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $37,014 $73,394 - $110,407
Other $67,350 - $176,405 - $10,288 $254,043
Total $173,617 $1,354,132 $2,450,503 $210,014 $10,288 $4,198,553
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

101
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Allison ES
Page 40
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

102 Andrews Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6801 Northeast Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1962 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,376 12,288 70,664
Area (GSF) per student 81 17 99
Number of Classrooms 31 16 47
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 717
Utilization (by enrollment) 147% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 692 -206
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 142%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -278 Perm Buildings 58,376 32.1%
2010-11 In Migration 061 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 075 Building A 1 1962 53,954 38.8%
Building B 1 1986 4,422 8.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.7
Parking Spaces 39

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $54,271 $150,146 - - $204,417 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,207,050*
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $619,584 $13,720 - - $633,304
Interior - $128,866 $530,543 $44,545 - $703,954
Mechanical - $1,372,878 $1,042,888 $22,487 - $2,438,253
Electrical - $260,909 $362,040 $35,208 - $658,157
Plumbing $239,166 - $327,938 $5,350 - $572,454
Fire & Life Safety $109,536 $73,733 - - - $183,268
Technology - $102,282 $476,976 - - $579,258
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $343,330 $83,069 - $426,399
Other $225,239 - $255,049 - $1,517,264 $1,997,552
Total $573,941 $2,633,109 $3,502,631 $190,659 $1,517,264 $8,417,604
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

102
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Andrews ES
Page 41
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

187 Baldwin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


Yr. Open Rating Historic
, Texas 0 No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 86,751 86,751
Area (GSF) per student 171 0 171
Number of Classrooms 38 0 38
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 508
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 557 112
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 27 Perm Buildings 86,751 0.0%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 2 2010 86,751

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) .0
Parking Spaces

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - - - $0 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $000*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - - - - $0
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Electrical - - - - - $0
Plumbing - - - - - $0
Fire & Life Safety - - - - - $0
Technology - - - - - $0
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - - - - $0
Other - - - - - $0
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

187
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baldwin ES
Page 42
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

182 Baranoff Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


12009 Buckingham Gate Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 80,088 6,144 86,232
Area (GSF) per student 91 7 98
Number of Classrooms 44 8 52
Permanent Capacity 794
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 876
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 891 -97
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 874 -80 Perm Buildings 80,088 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 081 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 093 Building A 1 1999 69,092 13.2%
Classroom 1 2008 10,996 5.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Parking Spaces 84

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $9,548 - - $9,548 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $729,123*
Roofing - $4,702 $521,184 - - $525,885
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $5,556 - - $5,556
Interior $926 $42,710 $270,307 $9,202 - $323,145
Mechanical - $57,841 $43,918 - - $101,759
Electrical - - $95,977 $24,556 - $120,533
Plumbing - $24,586 $27,074 $18,259 - $69,920
Fire & Life Safety $126,088 $72,942 $2,617 - - $201,648
Technology - $278,827 $631,528 - - $910,355
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $117,320 $225,980 - $343,300
Other $70,859 - $89,370 - $121,554 $281,783
Total $197,873 $531,250 $1,814,399 $277,997 $121,554 $2,943,072
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

182
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Baranoff ES
Page 43
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

149 Barrington Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


400 Cooper Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1969 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,971 21,504 100,475
Area (GSF) per student 79 22 101
Number of Classrooms 41 24 65
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 996
Utilization (by enrollment) 152% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 955 -301
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 146%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,098 -444 Perm Buildings 78,971 21.2%
2010-11 In Migration 084 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1969 50,792 39.6%
Building B 1 1999 15,285 4.9%
Site Data Building C 1 2010 100
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.1 Building D 1 2010 12,794 0.0%
Parking Spaces 68

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $7,043 $71,576 $54,752 - $133,371 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $806,409*
Roofing - $7,091 - - - $7,091
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $19,209 - - $19,209
Interior - $11,761 $447,963 $46,058 - $505,782
Mechanical $58,895 $16,736 $3,233,378 - - $3,309,009
Electrical $22,712 $95,267 $180,328 $32,952 - $331,258
Plumbing - - $354,720 $50,558 - $405,278
Fire & Life Safety $143,452 $84,850 - - - $228,302
Technology - $55,147 $523,988 - - $579,135
Conveyances - $198,566 - - - $198,566
Specialties - - $183,446 $127,022 - $310,468
Other $104,890 - $205,872 - $2,708,483 $3,019,245
Total $329,948 $476,461 $5,220,479 $311,342 $2,708,483 $9,046,714
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

149
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Barrington ES
Page 44
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

103 Barton Hills Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)


2108 Barton Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1964 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 38,291 10,752 49,043
Area (GSF) per student 99 28 127
Number of Classrooms 14 13 27
Permanent Capacity 251
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 386
Utilization (by enrollment) 154% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 203 48
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 199 52 Perm Buildings 38,291 29.8%
2010-11 In Migration 172 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 021 Building A 1 1964 32,101 33.1%
Building B 1 1964 2,985 20.7%
Site Data Band 1 2007 3,205 0.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 43

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $90,727 - - $95,333 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,258,939*
Roofing $1,970 - $17,708 - - $19,678
Structural $15,245 - $769 - - $16,014
Exterior - - $82,715 $383,049 - $465,764
Interior - - $347,145 $9,067 - $356,211
Mechanical - $19,430 $167,197 - - $186,627
Electrical $24,143 $55,790 $367,319 $9,030 - $456,282
Plumbing $144,398 - $155,949 $17,190 - $317,537
Fire & Life Safety $85,700 $65,351 - - - $151,052
Technology - $41,851 $188,065 - - $229,916
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $136,751 $28,851 - $165,602
Other $750,812 - $1,082,848 - $2,391 $1,836,051
Total $1,022,269 $236,671 $2,637,192 $447,186 $2,391 $4,345,708
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

103
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Barton Hills ES
Page 45
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

104 Becker Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


906 Milton St. West Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1936 EX Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,670 3,072 62,742
Area (GSF) per student 287 15 302
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 208
Utilization (by enrollment) 40% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 226 298
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 43%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 256 268 Perm Buildings 59,670 38.1%
2010-11 In Migration 069 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1936 56,835 39.2%
Mechanical 1 1939 499 26.9%
Site Data Building C 1 1936 1,237 21.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.7 Building D 1 1936 1,099 23.9%
Parking Spaces 0

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,927 $342,183 $2,225 - $349,335 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,232,456*
Roofing - $608,432 $37,370 $28,130 - $673,931
Structural - $7,792 - - - $7,792
Exterior - - $8,103 $19,303 - $27,407
Interior - $44,583 $185,934 $80,564 - $311,082
Mechanical $901,466 $1,168,099 $599,661 - - $2,669,227
Electrical - $174,132 $299,288 $7,366 - $480,786
Plumbing $29,802 - $1,547,453 $16,046 - $1,593,301
Fire & Life Safety $94,218 $62,525 - - - $156,743
Technology - $47,064 $354,610 - - $401,674
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $77,271 $99,315 - $176,585
Other $89,415 - $170,111 - $118,363 $377,889
Total $1,114,902 $2,117,554 $3,621,985 $252,949 $118,363 $7,225,752
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

104
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Becker ES
Page 46
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

105 Blackshear Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1712 East 11th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1903 AA Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,726 70,726
Area (GSF) per student 290 0 290
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 244
Utilization (by enrollment) 41% Percent of Capacity

Excess/
Deficit Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 288 310
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 48%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 275 323 Perm Buildings 70,726 35.0%
2010-11 In Migration 021 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 058 Building A 1 1903 70,726 34.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.3
Parking Spaces 52

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $170,707 $95,689 - $266,396 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$2,366,412*
Roofing - $1,423 $632,834 - - $634,256
Structural $4,394 - - - - $4,394
Exterior - $3,785 $452,580 $575,423 - $1,031,789
Interior $4,532 - $387,531 $3,206 - $395,269
Mechanical - $1,842,538 $922,533 - - $2,765,071
Electrical - $187,699 $578,074 $25,070 - $790,843
Plumbing - - $324,886 $10,698 - $335,584
Fire & Life Safety $101,399 $65,038 $2,617 - - $169,055
Technology - $77,782 $332,300 - - $410,082
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $55,364 $86,450 - $141,814
Other $77,822 - $343,085 - $58,019 $478,927
Total $188,148 $2,178,265 $4,202,512 $796,536 $58,019 $7,423,480
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

105
MƒAƒPƒPƒS ©, Magellan Consulting, Inc. 2011
Blackshear ES
Page 47
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

106 Blanton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


5408 Westminster Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1964 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 71,817 10,752 82,569
Area (GSF) per student 122 18 140
Number of Classrooms 40 10 50
Permanent Capacity 636
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 630 6
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 99%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 799 -163 Perm Buildings 71,817 19.6%
2010-11 In Migration 078 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 157 Building A 1 1964 56,530 22.1%
Building B 1 1964 3,546 26.8%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 11,424 6.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.0 Greenhouse 1 2004 317 35.8%
Parking Spaces 75

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $288,274 - - $288,274 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,725,011*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $2,793 - - $2,793
Interior - $106,775 $200,675 $46,975 - $354,425
Mechanical - $587,738 $614,997 - - $1,202,735
Electrical - $145,055 $802,902 $7,524 - $955,481
Plumbing $326,183 - $193,561 $31,163 - $550,906
Fire & Life Safety $124,149 $89,652 $2,617 - - $216,419
Technology - $53,729 $536,877 - - $590,606
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $123,565 $145,047 - $268,613
Other $192,446 - $84,158 - $59,146 $335,750
Total $642,778 $1,082,233 $2,850,419 $230,709 $59,146 $4,865,285
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

106
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blanton ES
Page 48
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

185 Blazier Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


8601 Vertex Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78747 2008 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 82,897 10,752 93,649
Area (GSF) per student 107 14 121
Number of Classrooms 38 10 48
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 775
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 896 -298
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 150%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 993 -395 Perm Buildings 82,897 5.1%
2010-11 In Migration 049 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 168 Building A 1 2008 82,897 4.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.4
Parking Spaces 95

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $508 $40,134 - $40,642 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $314,660*
Roofing - - $21,733 - - $21,733
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $64,065 $88,567 $12,027 - $164,658
Mechanical $11,527 - - - - $11,527
Electrical - - $23,877 $48,516 - $72,393
Plumbing - - $138,990 $17,118 - $156,108
Fire & Life Safety $125,254 $44,081 - - - $169,335
Technology - $69,732 $592,476 - - $662,208
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $31,404 $87,917 - $119,321
Other - - - - - $0
Total $136,781 $177,879 $897,555 $205,711 $0 $1,417,926
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

185
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Blazier ES
Page 49
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

170 Boone Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


8101 Croftwood Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1986 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 73,690 73,690
Area (GSF) per student 147 0 147
Number of Classrooms 42 0 42
Permanent Capacity 752
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 501
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 478 274
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 64%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 468 284 Perm Buildings 73,690 17.5%
2010-11 In Migration 130 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 106 Building A 1 1986 63,673 18.5%
Building B 1 1998 10,017 7.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.5
Parking Spaces 82

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $125,012 - $125,012 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $625,336*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $9,058 - - $9,058
Exterior - $9,899 - - - $9,899
Interior - - $186,467 $50,972 - $237,439
Mechanical $1,502 - $1,424,842 - - $1,426,344
Electrical - - $38,018 $34,099 - $72,117
Plumbing $109,823 - $214,827 $7,492 - $332,142
Fire & Life Safety $105,015 $71,301 - - - $176,316
Technology - $54,170 $629,580 - - $683,750
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $104,863 $130,565 - $235,429
Other $273,625 - $246,609 - $318,391 $838,626
Total $489,966 $135,370 $2,854,265 $348,141 $318,391 $4,146,133
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

170
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Boone ES
Page 50
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

107 Brentwood Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6700 Arroyo Seco Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1951 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 62,891 3,072 65,963
Area (GSF) per student 127 6 133
Number of Classrooms 33 3 36
Permanent Capacity 585
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 495
Utilization (by enrollment) 85% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 456 129
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 450 135 Perm Buildings 62,891 23.2%
2010-11 In Migration 149 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 110 Building A 1 1951 62,319 23.7%
Building B 1 1951 572
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.7
Parking Spaces 68

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $12,102 - $60,185 - - $72,287 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $980,422*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $7,945 - - $7,945
Exterior - - $134,776 - - $134,776
Interior - $868 $682,430 $45,770 - $729,067
Mechanical $33,509 $372,314 $787,027 - - $1,192,849
Electrical - $203,390 $179,931 $27,524 - $410,846
Plumbing - - $572,536 $10,701 - $583,236
Fire & Life Safety $99,872 $69,505 - - - $169,376
Technology - $47,732 $448,626 - - $496,358
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $108,798 $106,218 - $215,016
Other $141,131 - $399,050 - $1,625,875 $2,166,056
Total $286,613 $693,809 $3,381,304 $190,212 $1,625,875 $6,177,813
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

107
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brentwood ES
Page 51
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

108 Brooke Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3100 East 4th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1954 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 52,282 3,858 56,140
Area (GSF) per student 119 9 128
Number of Classrooms 27 5 32
Permanent Capacity 430
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 439
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 441 -11
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 103%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 471 -41 Perm Buildings 52,282 24.9%
2010-11 In Migration 075 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 1 1954 52,282 25.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.9
Parking Spaces 43

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $35,849 - - $35,849 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,195,217*
Roofing - $23,223 - - - $23,223
Structural - - $1,461 - - $1,461
Exterior - - $89,580 $13,732 - $103,312
Interior - $42,710 $129,374 $149,501 - $321,585
Mechanical - - $1,327,384 - - $1,327,384
Electrical - $447,716 $142,618 $1,900 - $592,234
Plumbing $291,538 - $311,932 $27,954 - $631,425
Fire & Life Safety $90,134 $66,443 - - - $156,577
Technology - $49,308 $406,816 - - $456,124
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $42,894 $69,049 - $111,943
Other $84,861 - $220,391 - $37,886 $343,138
Total $466,533 $728,683 $2,708,300 $262,136 $37,886 $4,203,538
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

108
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brooke ES
Page 52
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

109 Brown Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


505 W. Anderson Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1957 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 53,853 9,216 63,069
Area (GSF) per student 104 18 122
Number of Classrooms 29 12 41
Permanent Capacity 468
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 519
Utilization (by enrollment) 111% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 525 -58
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 546 -79 Perm Buildings 53,853 28.1%
2010-11 In Migration 074 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 096 Building A 1 1957 53,853 32.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Parking Spaces 58

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $25,359 $40,134 - $65,492 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,733,352*
Roofing $954,050 - $20,585 - - $974,635
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $61,590 - - $61,590
Interior - $106,775 $47,418 $499,529 - $653,722
Mechanical - $734,839 $387,333 - - $1,122,172
Electrical - $200,491 $97,915 $32,990 - $331,396
Plumbing $433,368 - $712,305 $5,350 - $1,151,024
Fire & Life Safety $106,953 $62,707 - - - $169,660
Technology - $48,342 $393,777 - - $442,119
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $78,323 $57,290 - $135,613
Other $85,828 - $84,704 - $2,665,997 $2,836,529
Total $1,580,199 $1,153,153 $1,909,309 $635,293 $2,665,997 $7,943,951
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

109
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Brown ES
Page 53
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

110 Bryker Woods Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)


3309 Kerbey Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1939 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 37,517 9,216 46,733
Area (GSF) per student 93 23 116
Number of Classrooms 16 12 28
Permanent Capacity 272
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 404
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 312 -40
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 115%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 333 -61 Perm Buildings 37,517 33.4%
2010-11 In Migration 094 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 047 Building A 1 1939 30,990 42.3%
Building B 1 1999 4,874 10.9%
Site Data Multi-Use 1 1949 451 14.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3 Multi-Use 1 1949 1,202
Parking Spaces 33

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $11,503 $2,135 - $64,475 - $78,114 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,308,938*
Roofing - - $49,869 - - $49,869
Structural - - $585 - - $585
Exterior - $3,842 $594,025 - - $597,867
Interior - $85,420 $186,592 $86,382 - $358,394
Mechanical - $671,437 $737,812 - - $1,409,249
Electrical $5,774 $258,851 $193,752 $8,554 - $466,931
Plumbing - - $595,420 $117,216 - $712,636
Fire & Life Safety $76,664 $56,369 - - - $133,033
Technology - $41,472 $228,241 - - $269,714
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $72,714 $71,979 - $144,693
Other $95,470 - $320,072 - $44,654 $460,196
Total $189,411 $1,119,527 $2,979,081 $348,606 $44,654 $4,681,279
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

110
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bryker Woods ES
Page 54
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

111 Campbell Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2613 Rogers Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78722 1992 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,793 1,536 63,329
Area (GSF) per student 172 4 176
Number of Classrooms 33 2 35
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 360
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 367 157
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 70%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 379 145 Perm Buildings 61,793 20.8%
2010-11 In Migration 056 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 063 Building A 1 1992 61,793 20.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $2,209 - $194,564 $19,758 - $216,531 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $691,291*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,992 - - $3,992
Exterior - - $1,436 - - $1,436
Interior - $21,355 $141,699 $44,826 - $207,880
Mechanical - $159,506 $1,609,266 - - $1,768,771
Electrical - $79,714 $22,047 $21,308 - $123,068
Plumbing - $5,673 $104,666 $8,562 - $118,900
Fire & Life Safety $102,685 $61,978 $2,617 - - $167,280
Technology - $51,473 $480,195 - - $531,667
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $93,514 $102,707 - $196,221
Other $206,699 - $376,708 - $377,355 $960,762
Total $311,592 $379,698 $3,030,703 $197,160 $377,355 $4,296,509
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

111
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Campbell ES
Page 55
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

173 Casey Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


9400 Texas Oaks Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1998 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,506 1,536 83,042
Area (GSF) per student 122 2 124
Number of Classrooms 44 2 46
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 669
Utilization (by enrollment) 94% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 763 -52
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 107%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 768 -57 Perm Buildings 81,506 16.7%
2010-11 In Migration 083 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 171 Building A 1 1998 81,506 17.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $11,274 - - $11,274 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $551,453*
Roofing - - - $1,823,016 - $1,823,016
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $21,355 $103,475 $259,333 - $384,163
Mechanical - $9,454 $175,204 - - $184,658
Electrical - $55,790 $69,561 $20,517 - $145,867
Plumbing - - $60,629 $9,631 - $70,260
Fire & Life Safety $118,356 $70,205 $2,617 - - $191,179
Technology - $61,817 $571,009 - - $632,826
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $94,992 $168,573 - $263,566
Other $214,476 - $191,954 - $78,748 $485,178
Total $332,832 $218,621 $1,280,715 $2,281,070 $78,748 $4,191,986
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

173
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Casey ES
Page 56
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

112 Casis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2710 Exposition Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1951 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 77,911 13,824 91,735
Area (GSF) per student 94 17 111
Number of Classrooms 38 16 54
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 825
Utilization (by enrollment) 123% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 -62
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 109%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 764 -95 Perm Buildings 77,911 17.4%
2010-11 In Migration 110 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 016 Building A 1 1951 77,710 17.8%
Storage 1 1977 201
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Parking Spaces 74

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $110,394 $128,950 - $239,343 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $912,046*
Roofing - $24,163 - - - $24,163
Structural $3,372 - - - - $3,372
Exterior - - $125,554 - - $125,554
Interior - $158,014 $91,098 $192,609 - $441,722
Mechanical $1,143 $225,633 $311,862 - - $538,638
Electrical $1,398 $139,476 $502,223 $285,421 - $928,518
Plumbing - - $883,640 $7,492 - $891,131
Fire & Life Safety $52,902 $47,234 - - - $100,136
Technology - $37,504 $553,409 - - $590,913
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $280,357 $117,401 - $397,758
Other $221,207 - $237,731 - $60,579 $519,518
Total $280,022 $632,024 $3,096,268 $731,873 $60,579 $4,800,767
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

112
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Casis ES
Page 57
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

184 Clayton Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


7525 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78739 2006 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 99,921 6,144 106,065
Area (GSF) per student 115 7 122
Number of Classrooms 47 8 55
Permanent Capacity 836
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 867
Utilization (by enrollment) 104% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 837 -1
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 100%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 905 -69 Perm Buildings 99,921 5.9%
2010-11 In Migration 087 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 048 Building A 1 2006 99,921 6.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 16.8
Parking Spaces 80

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $104,860 - - $104,860 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $518,872*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $110,324 $11,953 - $122,276
Mechanical - $94,332 - - - $94,332
Electrical - $55,790 $15,442 $18,970 - $90,203
Plumbing - - $40,274 $30,096 - $70,370
Fire & Life Safety $136,427 $66,371 - - - $202,798
Technology - $66,669 $727,735 - - $794,404
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $144,232 $154,373 - $298,605
Other - - - - - $0
Total $136,427 $382,446 $1,142,866 $215,392 $0 $1,877,130
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

184
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Clayton ES
Page 58
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

161 Cook Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


1511 Cripple Creek Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 1974 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 67,344 18,432 85,776
Area (GSF) per student 75 20 95
Number of Classrooms 35 23 58
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Utilization (by enrollment) 161% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,252 -691
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 223%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,388 -827 Perm Buildings 67,344 27.5%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 379 Building A 1 1974 58,243 37.0%
Building B 1 1998 9,101 7.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.7
Parking Spaces 102

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $5,447 $368,828 $71,282 $99,999 - $545,557 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,894,721*
Roofing - $23,862 - - - $23,862
Structural - $27,464 $124,896 - - $152,360
Exterior - $5,057 $13,275 - - $18,332
Interior - $24,947 $292,679 $56,423 - $374,049
Mechanical $113,579 $2,346,429 $305,774 - - $2,765,782
Electrical $612 $112,040 $498,713 $41,308 - $652,673
Plumbing $483,798 $7,984 $672,803 $17,116 - $1,181,702
Fire & Life Safety $139,760 $77,796 - - - $217,556
Technology - $52,591 $514,759 - - $567,349
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $170,614 $60,771 - $231,385
Other $104,525 - $171,689 - $3,529,726 $3,805,940
Total $847,723 $3,046,998 $2,836,484 $275,616 $3,529,726 $10,536,548
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

161
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cook ES
Page 59
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

183 Cowan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2817 Kentish Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1999 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,234 9,216 79,450
Area (GSF) per student 90 12 101
Number of Classrooms 37 12 49
Permanent Capacity 669
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 783
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 707 -38
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 704 -35 Perm Buildings 70,234 9.1%
2010-11 In Migration 196 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 121 Building A 1 1999 70,234 8.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 22.5
Parking Spaces 84

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $18,655 $75,046 - $98,307 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $723,486*
Roofing - - $57,513 - - $57,513
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - $770 - $770
Interior - $21,355 $195,024 $48,518 - $264,897
Mechanical - $76,432 - - - $76,432
Electrical - $5,580 $32,214 $45,189 - $82,983
Plumbing - - $136,947 $23,607 - $160,554
Fire & Life Safety $122,086 $71,547 - - - $193,633
Technology - $53,321 $543,971 - - $597,292
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $129,283 $76,537 - $205,820
Other $318,918 - $50,165 - $287,289 $656,372
Total $441,004 $282,482 $1,163,772 $269,668 $287,289 $2,444,215
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

183
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cowan ES
Page 60
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

113 Cunningham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2200 Berkeley Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1963 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 71,600 21,504 93,104
Area (GSF) per student 140 42 182
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 512
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 573 159
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 560 172 Perm Buildings 71,600 34.3%
2010-11 In Migration 116 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 174 Building A 1 1963 61,878 43.2%
Building B 1 1990 9,722 33.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.8
Parking Spaces 62

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $779,622 $272,621 - $1,052,243 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $378,644*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $1,685 - - - $1,685
Exterior $483 - $26,308 - - $26,791
Interior - $2,068 $210,570 $46,250 - $258,889
Mechanical - $74,272 $2,949,674 - - $3,023,946
Electrical - - $1,233,513 $39,131 - $1,272,644
Plumbing - $1,894 $2,411,481 $24,603 - $2,437,977
Fire & Life Safety $118,092 $70,131 - - - $188,222
Technology - $53,939 $547,184 - - $601,123
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $111,536 $92,651 - $204,187
Other $56,081 - $392,715 - $3,523,663 $3,972,459
Total $174,656 $203,988 $8,662,602 $475,256 $3,523,663 $13,040,166
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

113
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Cunningham ES
Page 61
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

179 Davis Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


5214 Duval Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78727 1993 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 72,149 4,608 76,757
Area (GSF) per student 106 7 112
Number of Classrooms 41 6 47
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 683
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 666 66
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 702 30 Perm Buildings 72,149 23.3%
2010-11 In Migration 047 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 035 Building A 1 1993 62,168 28.5%
Building B 1 1999 9,981 4.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 104

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $1,852 $40,134 - $41,985 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $621,725*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,372 - - $3,372
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior $1,219 $21,355 $1,112,754 $53,085 - $1,188,414
Mechanical - $9,454 $1,785,526 - - $1,794,980
Electrical - $44,631 $182,421 $45,586 - $272,638
Plumbing - - $133,339 $20,398 - $153,737
Fire & Life Safety $107,138 $67,067 $2,617 - - $176,823
Technology - $53,631 $545,092 - - $598,723
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $169,804 $82,961 - $252,764
Other $267,589 - $529,587 - $172,691 $969,866
Total $375,946 $245,779 $4,466,364 $242,164 $172,691 $5,502,944
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

179
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Davis ES
Page 62
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

154 Doss Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


7005 Northledge Dr Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78731 1970 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 60,228 12,288 72,516
Area (GSF) per student 78 16 94
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Permanent Capacity 543
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 768
Utilization (by enrollment) 141% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 728 -185
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 134%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 747 -204 Perm Buildings 60,228 26.2%
2010-11 In Migration 071 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 024 Building A 1 1970 55,582 34.4%
Bldg B 1 2009 4,646 0.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.7
Parking Spaces 73

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $68,518 $40,134 - $113,258 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,030,684*
Roofing - - $464,424 - - $464,424
Structural - $5,493 $68,609 - - $74,102
Exterior - - $731 - - $731
Interior - - $401,625 $50,410 - $452,035
Mechanical - $1,559,129 $716,716 - - $2,275,844
Electrical - $16,736 $858,105 $30,101 - $904,942
Plumbing - - $188,173 $15,048 - $203,221
Fire & Life Safety $109,107 $67,795 - - - $176,901
Technology - $49,792 $441,586 - - $491,378
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $108,677 $126,691 - $235,368
Other $168,386 - $49,256 - $585,467 $803,109
Total $277,493 $1,753,192 $3,366,419 $262,383 $585,467 $6,244,954
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

154
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Doss ES
Page 63
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

114 Dawson Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3001 South 1st Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1954 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 55,301 5,394 60,695
Area (GSF) per student 167 16 183
Number of Classrooms 32 3 35
Permanent Capacity 505
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 331
Utilization (by enrollment) 66% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 276 229
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 55%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 282 223 Perm Buildings 55,301 27.2%
2010-11 In Migration 113 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 059 Building A 1 1954 45,037 28.2%
Building B 1 1986 299 3.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1991 9,965 10.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.7
Parking Spaces 56

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $236,494 $42,588 - - $279,082 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,613,471*
Roofing - $1,297 $32,523 - - $33,821
Structural - - $27,004 - - $27,004
Exterior - - $58,409 - - $58,409
Interior $27,673 $85,420 $121,022 $10,149 - $244,264
Mechanical - $820,238 $195,656 - - $1,015,894
Electrical - $535,848 $131,343 $15,763 - $682,954
Plumbing - - $321,199 $6,420 - $327,619
Fire & Life Safety $82,474 $63,151 - - - $145,625
Technology - $46,000 $474,418 - - $520,418
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $342,862 $91,722 - $434,584
Other $714,876 - $417,782 - $1,374,936 $2,507,593
Total $825,023 $1,788,448 $2,164,807 $124,053 $1,374,936 $6,277,266
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

114
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Dawson ES
Page 64
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

176 Galindo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3800 S. 2nd St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1989 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 85,482 7,680 93,162
Area (GSF) per student 121 11 132
Number of Classrooms 44 10 54
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 704
Utilization (by enrollment) 99% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 689 22
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 705 6 Perm Buildings 85,482 11.4%
2010-11 In Migration 103 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 091 Building A 1 1989 84,582 10.0%
Mechanical 1 2001 900 91.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Parking Spaces 98

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,218 $5,085 - - $9,303 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,190,697*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $3,160 - - $3,160
Interior - $87,858 $147,364 $46,940 - $282,163
Mechanical $227,913 $23,049 $210,340 - - $461,302
Electrical $551 $62,382 $47,347 $1,821 - $112,101
Plumbing - - $70,598 $40,861 - $111,459
Fire & Life Safety $136,237 $76,517 - - - $212,754
Technology - $69,224 $647,749 - - $716,973
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $182,951 $148,333 - $331,284
Other $353,824 - $409,644 - $162,944 $926,412
Total $718,525 $472,173 $1,724,238 $237,955 $162,944 $3,315,834
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

176
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Galindo ES
Page 65
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

116 Govalle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3601 Govalle Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1940 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 77,638 77,638
Area (GSF) per student 187 0 187
Number of Classrooms 37 0 37
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 415
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 452 146
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 76%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 89 Perm Buildings 77,638 30.9%
2010-11 In Migration 052 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 104 Building A 1 1940 77,137 30.5%
Building B 1 1940 501 172.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $43,809 - - $48,415 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,479,660*
Roofing - - $33,366 - - $33,366
Structural - $5,349 $10,309 - - $15,658
Exterior - $17,361 $1,182,064 - - $1,199,425
Interior - $11,544 $114,440 $804,011 - $929,995
Mechanical - $711,013 $424,842 - - $1,135,855
Electrical - $235,885 $82,607 $26,336 - $344,828
Plumbing - $17,901 $1,297,172 $8,562 - $1,323,634
Fire & Life Safety $116,822 $67,936 - - - $184,758
Technology - $67,933 $536,415 - - $604,348
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $164,526 $547,821 - $712,346
Other $223,311 - $380,254 - $3,711,107 $4,314,671
Total $340,133 $1,139,527 $4,269,803 $1,386,730 $3,711,107 $10,847,299
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

116
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Govalle ES
Page 66
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

159 Graham Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


11211 Tom Adams Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1972 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 70,589 10,752 81,341
Area (GSF) per student 93 14 107
Number of Classrooms 38 11 49
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 761
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 825 -227
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 138%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 850 -252 Perm Buildings 70,589 30.4%
2010-11 In Migration 049 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 114 Building A 1 1972 44,946 45.0%
Building B 1 1993 14,411 14.5%
Site Data Building C 1 2008 11,232 4.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 77

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,180 $91,328 $230,407 $86,383 - $409,299 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,718,571*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $16,429 $76,531 $296 - $93,256
Exterior - $1,716 $3,157 - - $4,874
Interior - $46,368 $177,156 $252,277 - $475,801
Mechanical - $3,656,276 $245,364 - - $3,901,639
Electrical - - $262,635 $15,208 - $277,843
Plumbing $337,809 $771 $252,984 $9,631 - $601,195
Fire & Life Safety $127,799 $73,588 $2,617 - - $204,004
Technology - $53,595 $561,452 - - $615,048
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $2,119 $83,054 $99,068 - $184,241
Other $309,592 - $279,998 - $145,540 $735,129
Total $776,380 $3,942,191 $2,175,356 $462,863 $145,540 $7,502,330
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

159
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Graham ES
Page 67
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

117 Gullett Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


6310 Treadwell Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1956 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 39,827 11,525 51,352
Area (GSF) per student 74 21 95
Number of Classrooms 24 14 38
Permanent Capacity 418
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 541
Utilization (by enrollment) 129% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 325 93
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 78%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 342 76 Perm Buildings 39,827 29.2%
2010-11 In Migration 247 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 030 Building A 1 1956 39,648 35.0%
Mechanical 1 1972 179 11.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.9
Parking Spaces 30

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $10,933 $96,959 $40,134 - $148,025 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $774,178*
Roofing - $7,113 $92,238 - - $99,351
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $917 $51,820 - - $52,737
Interior - $42,710 $102,541 $45,619 - $190,871
Mechanical - $93,054 $1,012,442 - - $1,105,495
Electrical - $61,370 $687,901 $35,407 - $784,678
Plumbing - - $795,120 $36,511 - $831,631
Fire & Life Safety $88,849 $66,871 - - - $155,719
Technology - $46,009 $370,822 - - $416,831
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $107,868 $120,820 - $228,688
Other $207,430 - $86,329 - $5,578,522 $5,872,281
Total $296,279 $477,899 $3,404,040 $278,491 $5,578,522 $10,035,231
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

117
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Gullett ES
Page 68
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

118 Harris Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1711 Wheless Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1955 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 56,066 15,360 71,426
Area (GSF) per student 74 20 94
Number of Classrooms 34 16 50
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 758
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 755 -213
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 139%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 789 -247 Perm Buildings 56,066 21.5%
2010-11 In Migration 052 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 106 Building A 1 1955 41,954 32.2%
Building B 1 1998 14,112 11.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.3
Parking Spaces 33

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $174,752 - $174,752 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $631,447*
Roofing $16,363 $232,231 $16,363 - - $264,958
Structural - $2,401 - - - $2,401
Exterior - $2,099 $333,669 - - $335,768
Interior - - $110,532 $8,601 - $119,133
Mechanical - $93,054 $1,258,887 - - $1,351,940
Electrical - $5,580 $511,741 $44,635 - $561,955
Plumbing - - $562,894 $29,950 - $592,844
Fire & Life Safety $97,111 $80,372 - - - $177,483
Technology - $47,049 $509,762 - - $556,811
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $169,909 $93,228 - $263,136
Other $55,187 - $120,231 - $26,321 $201,740
Total $168,662 $462,786 $3,593,988 $351,166 $26,321 $4,602,922
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

118
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Harris ES
Page 69
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

163 Hart Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


8301 Furness Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1998 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,042 13,824 94,866
Area (GSF) per student 90 15 106
Number of Classrooms 44 18 62
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 898
Utilization (by enrollment) 126% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 888 -177
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 982 -271 Perm Buildings 81,042 10.3%
2010-11 In Migration 101 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 088 Building A 1 1998 69,867 12.6%
Building B 1 2010 11,175 4.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.7
Parking Spaces 62

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $85,478 - $37,799 $29,425 - $152,702 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $869,405*
Roofing - $7,887 - - - $7,887
Structural $824 $3,296 $1,169 - - $5,289
Exterior $2,221 $388 $202 - - $2,811
Interior $16,366 $27,849 $54,049 $41,169 - $139,433
Mechanical - $60,697 $1,143 - - $61,840
Electrical - $126,867 $541,461 $50,734 - $719,063
Plumbing - - $53,823 $20,398 - $74,221
Fire & Life Safety $143,408 $84,854 - - - $228,262
Technology - $67,824 $659,673 - - $727,497
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $125,968 $188,811 - $314,779
Other $191,807 - $230,451 - $150,402 $572,660
Total $440,103 $429,303 $1,705,738 $330,538 $150,402 $3,056,083
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

163
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Hart ES
Page 70
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

119 Highland Park Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


4900 Fairview Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78731 1952 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,550 9,216 67,766
Area (GSF) per student 88 14 102
Number of Classrooms 33 12 45
Permanent Capacity 585
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 662
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 599 -14
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 648 -63 Perm Buildings 58,550 31.1%
2010-11 In Migration 116 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 054 Building A 1 1952 58,550 34.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.3
Parking Spaces 60

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $230,132 $40,134 - $270,265 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $928,077*
Roofing - $21,733 $511,227 - - $532,959
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $25,788 - - $25,788
Interior - $42,710 $127,305 $59,113 - $229,128
Mechanical $169,708 $108,099 $2,038,859 - - $2,316,666
Electrical - $259,407 $334,090 $36,116 - $629,613
Plumbing - - $1,037,576 $3,209 - $1,040,785
Fire & Life Safety $106,474 $66,857 - - - $173,331
Technology - $50,681 $518,880 - - $569,560
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $148,392 $82,273 - $230,665
Other $102,408 - $145,599 - $2,357,371 $2,605,378
Total $378,590 $549,487 $5,117,848 $220,844 $2,357,371 $8,624,139
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

119
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Highland Park ES
Page 71
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

155 Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


8601 Tallwood Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78759 1970 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,626 9,216 78,842
Area (GSF) per student 95 13 108
Number of Classrooms 35 11 46
Permanent Capacity 627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 732
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 714 -87
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -107 Perm Buildings 69,626 26.8%
2010-11 In Migration 072 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 050 Building A 1 1970 62,010 32.1%
Building B 1 1990 7,616 17.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.9
Parking Spaces 74

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $8,269 $40,134 - $48,403 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,132,041*
Roofing - - $1,982,976 - - $1,982,976
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $292 - - $292
Interior - $106,775 $102,128 $47,029 - $255,933
Mechanical - $519,366 $811,683 $152,292 - $1,483,341
Electrical - - $336,308 $69,270 - $405,578
Plumbing $86,955 - $719,307 $10,698 - $816,960
Fire & Life Safety $122,357 $83,228 - - - $205,584
Technology - $53,374 $544,165 - - $597,539
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $53,658 $75,750 - $129,408
Other $159,986 - $195,096 - $2,849,188 $3,204,270
Total $369,298 $762,743 $4,753,883 $395,173 $2,849,188 $9,130,285
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

155
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Hill ES
Page 72
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

162 Houston Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


5409 Ponciana Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1976 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,360 15,360 96,720
Area (GSF) per student 89 17 105
Number of Classrooms 43 19 62
Permanent Capacity 692
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 917
Utilization (by enrollment) 133% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 897 -205
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 872 -180 Perm Buildings 81,360 36.5%
2010-11 In Migration 128 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 102 Building A 1 1976 55,814 54.5%
Building B 1 1991 8,863 32.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1991 5,303 25.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8 Building D 1 2006 11,380 10.8%
Parking Spaces 93

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $5,847 $9,453 $40,134 - $55,433 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,403,989*
Roofing - - $899,896 - - $899,896
Structural - - $8,788 - - $8,788
Exterior - - $3,658 $8,855 - $12,514
Interior - $54,696 $540,337 $62,669 - $657,703
Mechanical $36,988 $4,449,934 $1,127,316 - - $5,614,238
Electrical - $301,828 $224,073 $61,942 - $587,843
Plumbing - - $680,338 $49,351 - $729,689
Fire & Life Safety $147,480 $80,500 - - - $227,980
Technology - $63,918 $692,577 - - $756,494
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $205,773 $90,990 - $296,763
Other $163,516 - $390,742 - $513,050 $1,067,308
Total $347,984 $5,056,005 $4,782,952 $313,940 $513,050 $11,013,932
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

162
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Houston ES
Page 73
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

178 Jordan Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6711 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 1992 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 74,460 12,288 86,748
Area (GSF) per student 89 15 104
Number of Classrooms 41 16 57
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 833
Utilization (by enrollment) 127% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -52
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 108%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 707 -53 Perm Buildings 74,460 22.0%
2010-11 In Migration 200 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 075 Building A 1 1992 62,255 27.2%
Building B 1 2008 12,205 4.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Parking Spaces 114

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $5,980 $153,950 $40,134 - $200,064 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $870,552*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $6,370 - - $6,370
Exterior - - $32,022 - - $32,022
Interior - $21,355 $249,307 $55,637 - $326,299
Mechanical $16,073 $33,156 $2,260,379 - - $2,309,608
Electrical - $156,212 $406,010 $49,071 - $611,292
Plumbing - $79,525 $161,718 $30,096 - $271,339
Fire & Life Safety $118,309 $76,247 - - - $194,556
Technology - $54,550 $646,026 - - $700,576
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $144,437 $130,980 - $275,417
Other $209,863 - $437,570 - $366,415 $1,013,847
Total $344,244 $526,308 $4,497,788 $305,917 $366,415 $6,040,673
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

178
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Jordan ES
Page 74
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

120 Joslin Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


4500 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1954 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,826 7,680 52,506
Area (GSF) per student 123 21 145
Number of Classrooms 24 9 33
Permanent Capacity 374
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 363
Utilization (by enrollment) 97% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 329 45
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 345 29 Perm Buildings 44,826 40.6%
2010-11 In Migration 089 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 056 Building A 1 1954 30,934 55.6%
Building B 1 1957 10,642 41.4%
Site Data Building C 1 1986 3,250 5.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.1
Parking Spaces 56

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $165,935 $4,802 - - $170,737 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,024,241*
Roofing - $606,704 $219,611 - - $826,316
Structural - $4,719 $1,537 - - $6,256
Exterior - - $1,232,954 - - $1,232,954
Interior - - $41,905 $212,692 - $254,597
Mechanical - $627,110 $884,215 $171,550 - $1,682,876
Electrical - $47,787 $376,979 $5,227 - $429,993
Plumbing $261,201 - $467,302 $14,976 - $743,479
Fire & Life Safety $88,812 $59,839 $2,617 - - $151,268
Technology - $47,435 $358,949 - - $406,384
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $94,829 $84,871 - $179,700
Other $15,415 - $142,381 - $1,761,730 $1,919,525
Total $365,427 $1,658,814 $3,828,081 $489,316 $1,761,730 $8,103,367
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

120
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Joslin ES
Page 75
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

180 Kiker Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


5913 La Crosse Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78739 1992 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 76,332 15,360 91,692
Area (GSF) per student 82 16 98
Number of Classrooms 42 13 55
Permanent Capacity 752
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 933
Utilization (by enrollment) 124% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 883 -131
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 852 -100 Perm Buildings 76,332 16.4%
2010-11 In Migration 129 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 080 Building A 1 1992 63,549 21.1%
Building B 1 2007 12,783 4.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.4
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $10,547 $87,037 - $97,584 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $751,145*
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Structural - $3,302 - - - $3,302
Exterior $62,649 - $590 - - $63,239
Interior - $128,130 $344,258 $41,886 - $514,274
Mechanical - - $1,460,014 - - $1,460,014
Electrical - - $9,906 $29,467 - $39,374
Plumbing - - $216,461 $11,770 - $228,231
Fire & Life Safety $126,090 $78,994 - - - $205,083
Technology - $54,681 $646,497 - - $701,179
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $215,347 $61,320 - $276,667
Other $276,715 - $577,848 - $270,058 $1,124,621
Total $465,453 $285,692 $3,481,469 $231,480 $270,058 $4,734,153
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

180
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kiker ES
Page 76
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

172 Kocurek Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


9800 Curlew Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,528 1,536 80,064
Area (GSF) per student 119 2 121
Number of Classrooms 42 2 44
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 660
Utilization (by enrollment) 98% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 687 -14
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 698 -25 Perm Buildings 78,528 25.5%
2010-11 In Migration 106 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 1986 68,029 28.6%
Building B 1 1998 10,499 8.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 12.3
Parking Spaces 70

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $20,597 $118,823 $73,933 - $213,354 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,015,969*
Roofing - $7,927 - - - $7,927
Structural - - $3,472 $23,558 - $27,030
Exterior - $258 $21,688 $7,965 - $29,911
Interior - - $121,380 $45,109 - $166,489
Mechanical - $264,419 $3,033,863 - - $3,298,282
Electrical - $160,129 $85,511 $20,237 - $265,877
Plumbing - - $170,382 $36,585 - $206,967
Fire & Life Safety $112,894 $69,086 - - - $181,980
Technology - $67,872 $659,846 - - $727,718
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $175,608 $130,463 - $306,071
Other $163,863 - $320,146 - $84,409 $568,417
Total $276,757 $739,213 $4,710,718 $337,850 $84,409 $6,148,946
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

172
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kocurek ES
Page 77
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

168 Langford Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2206 Blue Meadow Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1980 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,250 16,896 95,146
Area (GSF) per student 94 20 114
Number of Classrooms 43 21 64
Permanent Capacity 692
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 834
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 895 -203
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 946 -254 Perm Buildings 78,250 33.6%
2010-11 In Migration 054 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 103 Building A 1 1980 57,666 51.7%
Building B 1 1996 8,753 16.9%
Site Data Building C 1 2010 11,831 3.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 83

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $45,535 $75,331 $42,669 - $163,535 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $6,366,305*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $2,170 - - $2,170
Exterior - $79,485 $202 - - $79,688
Interior - $24,894 $437,101 $47,124 - $509,120
Mechanical $23,055 $5,212,923 $470,507 - - $5,706,485
Electrical - $274,183 $345,120 $52,952 - $672,255
Plumbing $220,334 - $466,878 $30,024 - $717,236
Fire & Life Safety $148,475 $81,228 - - - $229,703
Technology - $55,232 $651,423 - - $706,655
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $158,946 $120,358 - $279,303
Other $151,320 - $239,586 - $600,073 $990,979
Total $543,183 $5,823,122 $2,847,265 $293,128 $600,073 $10,106,772
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

168
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Langford ES
Page 78
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

121 Lee Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)


3308 Hampton Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78705 1939 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 46,265 768 47,033
Area (GSF) per student 108 2 110
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Permanent Capacity 418
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 428
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 308 110
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 325 93 Perm Buildings 46,265 41.1%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 025 Building A 1 1939 38,816 44.8%
Mechanical 1 1939 460 13.7%
Site Data Library 1 1998 5,679 8.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.8 Building D 1 1939 1,310 24.2%
Parking Spaces 35

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $6,267 $78,354 - - $84,621 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,992,020*
Roofing - $78,378 $7,013 - - $85,391
Structural - $32,808 - - - $32,808
Exterior - $137,099 $17,506 - - $154,605
Interior - $3,267 $289,684 $48,675 - $341,626
Mechanical - $792,855 $977,327 - - $1,770,182
Electrical - $145,055 $437,498 $24,197 - $606,750
Plumbing - $38,607 $988,639 $25,675 - $1,052,921
Fire & Life Safety $73,630 $55,635 - - - $129,265
Technology - $47,901 $407,694 - - $455,595
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $227,364 $67,925 $101,699 - $396,988
Other $353,154 - $292,571 - $36,675 $682,400
Total $426,784 $1,565,236 $3,564,212 $200,247 $36,675 $5,793,153
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

121
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lee ES
Page 79
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

160 Linder Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2800 Metcalfe Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78741 1972 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,250 16,896 86,146
Area (GSF) per student 78 19 97
Number of Classrooms 34 22 56
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 892
Utilization (by enrollment) 164% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 956 -414
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 176%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -489 Perm Buildings 69,250 19.9%
2010-11 In Migration 062 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 132 Building A 1 1972 69,250 23.7%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.1
Parking Spaces 86

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $194,636 $40,134 - $234,770 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,657,659*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $48,399 - - $48,399
Exterior - - $397 - - $397
Interior - $85,420 $188,004 $156,894 - $430,318
Mechanical - $1,183,106 $1,370,191 - - $2,553,297
Electrical - $87,923 $75,235 $27,921 - $191,079
Plumbing - - $282,747 $7,489 - $290,237
Fire & Life Safety $138,680 $77,410 - - - $216,090
Technology - $53,083 $517,073 - - $570,155
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $245,387 $141,453 - $386,840
Other $32,036 - $142,186 - $5,824,800 $5,999,023
Total $170,717 $1,486,942 $3,064,256 $373,892 $5,824,800 $10,920,607
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

160
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Linder ES
Page 80
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

122 Maplewood Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


3808 Maplewood Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78722 1951 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 45,390 9,216 54,606
Area (GSF) per student 112 23 134
Number of Classrooms 20 12 32
Permanent Capacity 355
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 406
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 300 55
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 84%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 383 -28 Perm Buildings 45,390 37.4%
2010-11 In Migration 129 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 069 Building A 1 1951 44,818 41.9%
Storage 1 1952 572 6.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Parking Spaces 42

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $8,593 $528,568 - - $537,161 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,997,762*
Roofing - $107,641 - - - $107,641
Structural - - $2,844 - - $2,844
Exterior - - $98,285 - - $98,285
Interior - $1,159 $296,359 $36,200 - $333,719
Mechanical - - $1,761,164 - - $1,761,164
Electrical - $145,055 $285,463 $9,109 - $439,626
Plumbing $1,432,387 - $355,682 $6,422 - $1,794,492
Fire & Life Safety $76,274 $61,452 - - - $137,727
Technology - $43,627 $285,586 - - $329,213
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $137,772 $67,809 - $205,581
Other $121,573 - $203,563 - $2,005,569 $2,330,705
Total $1,630,235 $367,527 $3,955,287 $119,540 $2,005,569 $8,078,158
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

122
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Maplewood ES
Page 81
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

123 Mathews Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


906 West Lynn St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1916 EX Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 42,112 4,606 46,718
Area (GSF) per student 104 11 115
Number of Classrooms 23 6 29
Permanent Capacity 397
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 405
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 284 113
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 72%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 297 100 Perm Buildings 42,112 31.2%
2010-11 In Migration 106 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1916 41,573 34.8%
Building B 1 1948 391
Site Data Building C 1 1965 48
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.3 Building D 1 1996 100 3.6%
Parking Spaces 0

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $69,246 - - $69,246 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,511,822*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $8,430 - - - $8,430
Exterior - - $12,088 $113,496 - $125,584
Interior - $109,029 $95,427 $34,351 - $238,808
Mechanical $6,971 $979,213 $687,427 $15,202 - $1,688,813
Electrical - $199,892 $141,617 $25,227 - $366,737
Plumbing - $4,991 $946,615 $6,420 - $958,026
Fire & Life Safety $55,849 $54,246 - - - $110,095
Technology - $52,122 $337,778 - - $389,900
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $122,219 $91,283 - $213,502
Other $41,079 - $125,550 - $2,282,922 $2,449,551
Total $103,898 $1,407,923 $2,537,969 $285,980 $2,282,922 $6,618,692
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

123
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mathews ES
Page 82
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

165 McBee Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


1001 West Braker Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 1999 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,717 9,216 78,933
Area (GSF) per student 91 12 103
Number of Classrooms 36 12 48
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 765
Utilization (by enrollment) 132% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,031 -451
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 178%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,083 -503 Perm Buildings 69,717 7.9%
2010-11 In Migration 030 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 301 Building A 1 1999 69,717 7.8%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.9
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $58,760 $1,308 $1,112 - - $61,180 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $556,867*
Roofing - - $4,268 - - $4,268
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $1,716 - - $1,716
Interior - $89,744 $84,538 $124,936 - $299,218
Mechanical - $21,645 $29,969 - - $51,614
Electrical - $81,656 $30,695 $45,032 - $157,383
Plumbing - - $37,720 $9,631 - $47,351
Fire & Life Safety $117,796 $75,825 - - - $193,621
Technology - $49,166 $577,456 - - $626,622
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $168,777 $62,784 - $231,561
Other $60,968 - $99,797 - $57,384 $218,148
Total $237,524 $319,343 $1,036,048 $242,383 $57,384 $1,892,682
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

165
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
McBee ES
Page 83
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

147 Menchaca Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


12120 Manchaca Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1975 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,978 10,752 70,730
Area (GSF) per student 87 16 103
Number of Classrooms 34 12 46
Permanent Capacity 606
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 686
Utilization (by enrollment) 113% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 685 -79
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 629 -23 Perm Buildings 59,978 36.9%
2010-11 In Migration 113 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1975 59,978 43.5%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Parking Spaces 83

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $42,176 $111,016 $73,933 - $227,126 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,551,155*
Roofing - $32,373 $28,907 - - $61,280
Structural - - $877 - - $877
Exterior - - $4,712 - - $4,712
Interior - $128,130 $257,782 $462,745 - $848,657
Mechanical - $3,855,561 $730,614 - - $4,586,174
Electrical - $88,453 $40,491 $50,379 - $179,322
Plumbing - - $560,898 $16,048 - $576,946
Fire & Life Safety $102,512 $41,970 - - - $144,482
Technology - $125,045 $455,240 - - $580,285
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $102,211 $90,546 - $192,757
Other $134,935 - $224,219 - $82,611 $441,764
Total $237,446 $4,313,709 $2,516,965 $693,652 $82,611 $7,844,383
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

147
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Menchaca ES
Page 84
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

124 Metz Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


84 Robert T. Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1993 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,905 3,072 64,977
Area (GSF) per student 124 6 130
Number of Classrooms 34 4 38
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 498
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 477 65
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 88%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 509 33 Perm Buildings 61,905 30.6%
2010-11 In Migration 088 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 064 Building A 1 1993 61,905 32.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.4
Parking Spaces 45

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,481 $654 $14,812 $2,225 - $19,172 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,443,840*
Roofing - $1,686,580 $373 - - $1,686,953
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $2,221 - - - $2,221
Interior - $42,710 $68,165 $52,813 - $163,688
Mechanical - $138,412 $1,871,641 - - $2,010,054
Electrical - $211,049 $23,656 $21,704 - $256,409
Plumbing - - $108,586 $8,559 - $117,145
Fire & Life Safety $84,706 $64,395 $2,617 - - $151,718
Technology - $52,126 $513,620 - - $565,747
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $144,856 $154,598 - $299,454
Other $159,506 - $475,748 - $213,073 $848,327
Total $245,693 $2,198,147 $3,224,075 $239,898 $213,073 $6,120,886
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

124
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Metz ES
Page 85
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

181 Mills Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6201 Davis Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1998 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 81,368 12,288 93,656
Area (GSF) per student 88 13 101
Number of Classrooms 44 16 60
Permanent Capacity 794
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 928
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 831 -37
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 821 -27 Perm Buildings 81,368 12.7%
2010-11 In Migration 134 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 031 Building A 1 1998 81,368 13.7%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 104

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $4,271 $140,421 - $144,692 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $692,608*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $2,701 - - $2,701
Exterior - - $12,051 - - $12,051
Interior - $85,420 $238,434 $12,904 - $336,758
Mechanical - $30,001 $735,357 $202,621 - $967,978
Electrical $454 $129,501 $20,194 $26,219 - $176,368
Plumbing - - $99,786 $6,422 - $106,208
Fire & Life Safety $140,775 $78,130 - - - $218,905
Technology - $65,331 $691,892 - - $757,223
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $136,728 $216,156 - $352,884
Other $113,354 - $300,224 - $163,005 $576,583
Total $254,583 $438,024 $2,241,637 $604,743 $163,005 $3,701,993
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

181
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mills ES
Page 86
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

150 Norman Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


4001 Tannehill Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78721 1970 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 58,519 1,536 60,055
Area (GSF) per student 176 5 180
Number of Classrooms 30 2 32
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 333
Utilization (by enrollment) 68% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 376 110
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 77%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 348 138 Perm Buildings 58,519 32.6%
2010-11 In Migration 024 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 073 Building A 1 1970 44,692 41.8%
Classroom 1 2007 13,827 4.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.2
Parking Spaces 74

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $87,439 $114,067 - $201,506 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,110,870*
Roofing - - $453,578 - - $453,578
Structural - $1,873 - - - $1,873
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $499,495 $43,010 - $542,505
Mechanical - $1,300,661 $1,169,687 - - $2,470,348
Electrical - $209,477 $378,944 $31,881 - $620,302
Plumbing $240,330 - $339,444 $8,562 - $588,335
Fire & Life Safety $87,986 $60,327 - - - $148,313
Technology - $46,535 $386,706 - - $433,241
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $47,268 $51,613 - $98,881
Other $163,681 - $125,797 - $1,961,658 $2,251,136
Total $491,997 $1,618,873 $3,488,359 $249,133 $1,961,658 $7,810,019
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

150
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Norman ES
Page 87
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

125 Oak Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3601 Webberville Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1958 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 47,102 6,144 53,246
Area (GSF) per student 172 22 194
Number of Classrooms 26 6 32
Permanent Capacity 411
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 274
Utilization (by enrollment) 67% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293 118
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 330 81 Perm Buildings 47,102 26.0%
2010-11 In Migration 036 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 046 Building A 1 1958 43,131 28.1%
Building B 1 1984 3,971 15.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Parking Spaces 47

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $65,735 - - $65,735 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,980,974*
Roofing - $12,365 $4,355 - - $16,719
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $160,769 - - $160,769
Interior - $85,420 $163,853 $75,624 - $324,898
Mechanical $129,699 $1,004,248 $497,533 - - $1,631,481
Electrical - $55,790 $361,078 $36,872 - $453,741
Plumbing - $248,158 $128,899 $18,257 - $395,314
Fire & Life Safety $86,125 $59,691 - - - $145,816
Technology - $29,465 $311,196 - - $340,661
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $77,847 $88,134 - $165,980
Other $220,372 - $142,261 - $30,328 $392,960
Total $436,196 $1,544,778 $1,913,526 $218,887 $30,328 $4,143,715
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

125
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Oak Springs ES
Page 88
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

156 Odom Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1010 Turtle Creek Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1970 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 61,009 13,824 74,833
Area (GSF) per student 93 21 114
Number of Classrooms 34 14 48
Permanent Capacity 542
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Utilization (by enrollment) 121% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 706 -164
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 719 -177 Perm Buildings 61,009 19.2%
2010-11 In Migration 058 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 101 Building A 1 1970 61,009 21.8%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.6
Parking Spaces 72

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $47,393 $18,972 - - $66,364 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $869,872*
Roofing - - $41,171 - - $41,171
Structural - $5,518 - - - $5,518
Exterior - - $202 - - $202
Interior - $106,775 $158,316 $115,216 - $380,308
Mechanical - $89,478 $1,387,846 - - $1,477,324
Electrical - $214,246 $326,371 $23,526 - $564,142
Plumbing - - $742,105 $24,603 - $766,707
Fire & Life Safety $117,601 $44,656 $2,617 - - $164,874
Technology - $47,014 - - - $47,014
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $142,742 $140,859 - $283,601
Other $197,192 - $231,175 - $75,095 $503,462
Total $314,793 $555,080 $3,051,516 $304,204 $75,095 $4,300,687
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

156
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Odom ES
Page 89
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

148 Oak Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6101 Patton Ranch Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78735 1974 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 75,784 10,752 86,536
Area (GSF) per student 98 14 112
Number of Classrooms 43 14 57
Permanent Capacity 773
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 772
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 820 -47
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 106%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 918 -145 Perm Buildings 75,784 33.6%
2010-11 In Migration 057 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1974 59,574 43.2%
Building B 1 1984 16,210 20.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.7
Parking Spaces 97

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $8,459 $125,527 $73,933 - $207,920 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,140,659*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $3,335 - - $3,335
Exterior - - $38,383 - - $38,383
Interior - $42,710 $1,072,603 $180,232 - $1,295,545
Mechanical - $2,369,967 $334,717 - - $2,704,684
Electrical - $11,159 $1,261,583 $50,338 - $1,323,079
Plumbing $167,045 - $1,167,768 $27,814 - $1,362,627
Fire & Life Safety $116,414 $75,574 - - - $191,988
Technology - $54,881 $640,716 - - $695,597
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $176,257 $85,095 - $261,352
Other $294,450 - $261,725 - $46,822 $602,998
Total $577,910 $2,562,750 $5,082,614 $417,412 $46,822 $8,687,508
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

148
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Oak Hill ES
Page 90
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

126 Ortega Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1135 Garland Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78721 1959 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 47,302 3,072 50,374
Area (GSF) per student 160 10 170
Number of Classrooms 24 1 25
Permanent Capacity 374
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 266 108
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 269 105 Perm Buildings 47,302 40.0%
2010-11 In Migration 053 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 023 Building A 1 1959 19,106 51.8%
Building B 1 1966 20,907 33.7%
Site Data Building C 1 1959 5,146 62.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.4 Administration 1 1968 2,143 4.7%
Parking Spaces 36

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $40,487 $12,624 - $53,112 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,139,712*
Roofing - $1,515,309 $25,714 - - $1,541,023
Structural - - $101,906 - - $101,906
Exterior - - $1,040 - - $1,040
Interior - $21,355 $33,243 $49,806 - $104,404
Mechanical $49,160 $824,283 $951,354 - - $1,824,796
Electrical - $73,769 $382,619 $33,545 - $489,933
Plumbing $273,510 - $513,427 $19,326 - $806,263
Fire & Life Safety $81,278 $57,173 - - - $138,451
Technology - $44,049 $361,196 - - $405,245
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $111,385 $73,315 - $184,700
Other $150,185 - $144,467 - $55,295 $349,948
Total $554,133 $2,585,580 $2,666,838 $188,616 $55,295 $6,050,462
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

126
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ortega ES
Page 91
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

189 Overton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


7201 Colony Loop Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 2007 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 91,163 12,288 103,451
Area (GSF) per student 136 18 155
Number of Classrooms 39 15 54
Permanent Capacity 617
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 668
Utilization (by enrollment) 108% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 948 -331
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 154%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 972 -355 Perm Buildings 91,163 4.7%
2010-11 In Migration 044 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 217 Building A 1 2007 91,163 4.2%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 70.4
Parking Spaces 175

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $5,287 $114,067 - $119,354 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $351,852*
Roofing - - $14,805 - - $14,805
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $21,355 $95,057 $48,506 - $164,918
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Electrical - $55,790 $12,722 $11,169 - $79,681
Plumbing - - $66,546 $14,979 - $81,525
Fire & Life Safety $129,148 $43,854 - - - $173,002
Technology - $52,063 $572,427 - - $624,490
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $45,799 $96,956 - $142,756
Other - - - - - $0
Total $129,148 $222,703 $812,642 $285,677 $0 $1,450,171
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

189
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Overton ES
Page 92
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

171 Palm Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


7601 Dixie Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1987 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,082 3,072 82,154
Area (GSF) per student 130 5 136
Number of Classrooms 42 4 46
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 606
Utilization (by enrollment) 90% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 637 36
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 95%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 667 6 Perm Buildings 79,082 11.1%
2010-11 In Migration 050 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 081 Building A 1 1987 68,119 10.9%
Building B 1 2005 10,963 7.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $18,391 $37,763 $40,134 - $96,287 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $682,248*
Roofing - $6,899 - - - $6,899
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $242 - $8,918 $38,694 - $47,854
Interior - $23,156 $115,259 $69,249 - $207,664
Mechanical - $9,454 $161,906 - - $171,359
Electrical - $163,064 $54,695 $45,744 - $263,504
Plumbing - - $179,032 $10,701 - $189,732
Fire & Life Safety $117,288 $70,637 $2,617 - - $190,543
Technology - $64,029 $618,895 - - $682,925
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $113,500 $98,369 - $211,869
Other $209,088 - $423,487 - $156,623 $789,198
Total $326,618 $355,630 $1,716,073 $302,890 $156,623 $2,857,834
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

171
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Palm ES
Page 93
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

143 Patton Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6001 Westcreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1986 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 76,687 10,752 87,439
Area (GSF) per student 84 12 96
Number of Classrooms 43 13 56
Permanent Capacity 773
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 914
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 908 -135
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 117%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 966 -193 Perm Buildings 76,687 18.1%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 095 Building A 1 1986 76,687 19.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 24.1
Parking Spaces 109

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $13,373 $4,610 - - $17,982 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,905,083*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $2,114 $1,121 - - $3,234
Interior $741 $149,485 $75,569 $40,077 - $265,872
Mechanical $272,094 $961,395 $869,063 - - $2,102,552
Electrical $480 $95,192 $49,465 $30,576 - $175,713
Plumbing - - $163,075 $8,562 - $171,637
Fire & Life Safety $131,145 $75,540 - - - $206,685
Technology - $54,860 $623,617 - - $678,477
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $128,110 $93,252 - $221,363
Other $148,665 - $726,882 - $309,114 $1,184,662
Total $553,125 $1,351,958 $2,641,513 $172,467 $309,114 $5,028,177
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

143
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Patton ES
Page 94
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

128 Pease Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)


1106 Rio Grande Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78701 1876 EX Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 35,624 35,624
Area (GSF) per student 139 0 139
Number of Classrooms 17 0 17
Permanent Capacity 293
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 256
Utilization (by enrollment) 87% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 293
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 293 Perm Buildings 35,624 75.8%
2010-11 In Migration 220 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1876 30,754 82.3%
Building B 1 1998 4,870 17.0%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 2.8
Parking Spaces 45

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $172,907 $664,245 $191,141 - $1,028,292 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,205,258*
Roofing - $287,386 - - - $287,386
Structural - - $35,507 - - $35,507
Exterior - $14,064 $451,081 - - $465,145
Interior - - $661,149 $8,135 - $669,284
Mechanical $19,972 $1,818,797 $343,436 - - $2,182,205
Electrical $60,588 $423,750 $571,433 $1,900 - $1,057,671
Plumbing - - $870,769 $20,327 - $891,096
Fire & Life Safety $60,070 $49,702 - $513,796 - $623,569
Technology - $72,214 $244,011 - - $316,225
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties $12,393 - $93,350 $59,933 - $165,676
Other $213,415 - $95,838 - $51,831 $361,083
Total $366,438 $2,838,820 $4,030,819 $795,232 $51,831 $8,083,139
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

128
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pease ES
Page 95
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

129 Pecan Springs Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3100 Rogge Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1957 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 56,992 9,216 66,208
Area (GSF) per student 107 17 124
Number of Classrooms 30 16 46
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 532
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 490 -4
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 501 -15 Perm Buildings 56,992 37.2%
2010-11 In Migration 077 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 068 Building A 1 1957 46,209 44.0%
Building B 1 1990 10,783 26.8%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.6
Parking Spaces 63

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $11,743 $298,033 - $309,776 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $558,706*
Roofing - $20,585 $20,585 $984,274 - $1,025,445
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $882,228 - - $882,228
Interior - - $230,050 $99,850 - $329,899
Mechanical - $19,853 $1,145,461 $23,055 - $1,188,368
Electrical - $150,635 $1,333,300 $38,734 - $1,522,669
Plumbing - - $698,316 $20,398 - $718,714
Fire & Life Safety $99,554 $63,610 - - - $163,165
Technology - $50,268 $475,845 - - $526,112
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $147,312 $78,011 - $225,323
Other $104,559 - $277,133 - $90,134 $471,826
Total $204,113 $354,593 $5,221,971 $1,542,355 $90,134 $7,413,166
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

129
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pecan Springs ES
Page 96
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

190 Perez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


7500 S. Pleasant Valley Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 2006 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 82,223 15,360 97,583
Area (GSF) per student 93 17 110
Number of Classrooms 37 19 56
Permanent Capacity 598
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 886
Utilization (by enrollment) 148% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 945 -347
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 158%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 980 -382 Perm Buildings 82,223 9.0%
2010-11 In Migration 066 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 123 Building A 1 2006 82,223 10.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.0
Parking Spaces 106

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $7,999 - - $7,999 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,422,361*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $11,450 - - $11,450
Interior - $42,710 $89,644 $11,718 - $144,072
Mechanical $642,083 - $3,280 - - $645,363
Electrical - $23,827 $58,015 $22,813 - $104,655
Plumbing $431,564 - $119,257 $8,557 - $559,377
Fire & Life Safety $132,552 $81,267 - - - $213,819
Technology - $68,359 $587,513 - - $655,872
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $151,024 $107,721 - $258,745
Other - - - - - $0
Total $1,206,199 $216,162 $1,028,182 $150,809 $0 $2,601,352
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

190
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Perez ES
Page 97
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

164 Pickle Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1101 Wheatley Avenue Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 2001 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 120,862 6,144 127,006
Area (GSF) per student 163 8 172
Number of Classrooms 39 8 47
Permanent Capacity 617
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 740
Utilization (by enrollment) 120% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 737 -120
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 119%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 802 -185 Perm Buildings 120,862 5.7%
2010-11 In Migration 056 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 058 Building A 1 2001 120,862 5.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 17.5
Parking Spaces 132

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $31,650 $193,425 - $225,074 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $550,286*
Roofing - - $2,429 - - $2,429
Structural - - $3,616 - - $3,616
Exterior - - $12,894 - - $12,894
Interior - $64,065 $92,964 $43,330 - $200,359
Mechanical - - - - - $0
Electrical - - $88,466 $10,218 - $98,684
Plumbing - - $90,090 $23,607 - $113,697
Fire & Life Safety $178,166 $91,255 - - - $269,421
Technology - $78,233 $637,697 - - $715,930
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $120,738 $77,413 - $198,152
Other $88,926 - $160,756 - $116,853 $366,535
Total $267,092 $283,194 $1,241,301 $347,992 $116,853 $2,256,432
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

164
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pickle ES
Page 98
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

151 Pillow Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3025 Crosscreek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1969 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 54,247 10,752 64,999
Area (GSF) per student 83 16 100
Number of Classrooms 29 14 43
Permanent Capacity 523
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 653
Utilization (by enrollment) 125% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 651 -129
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 125%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 734 -212 Perm Buildings 54,247 42.9%
2010-11 In Migration 095 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 090 Building A 1 1969 54,247 52.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Parking Spaces 53

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $97,541 $62,869 $15,011 - $175,421 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $570,972*
Roofing - - $2,131,311 - - $2,131,311
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $30,260 - - $30,260
Interior - $42,710 $293,433 $44,466 - $380,609
Mechanical - $41,700 $1,825,126 - - $1,866,825
Electrical - - $720,598 $51,488 - $772,086
Plumbing - - $1,574,606 $55,933 - $1,630,539
Fire & Life Safety $107,100 $66,281 - - - $173,381
Technology - $49,648 $441,067 - - $490,715
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $179,417 $126,230 - $305,647
Other $116,352 - $178,920 - $2,716,120 $3,011,391
Total $223,451 $347,521 $7,437,607 $293,128 $2,716,120 $11,017,828
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

151
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pillow ES
Page 99
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


6405 Circle S Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1985 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 65,729 7,680 73,409
Area (GSF) per student 106 12 119
Number of Classrooms 33 10 43
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 619
Utilization (by enrollment) 118% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 631 -107
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 121%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 680 -156 Perm Buildings 65,729 19.6%
2010-11 In Migration 087 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 099 Building A 1 1985 65,729 21.5%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.1
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,550 $82,599 - - $84,149 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $760,750*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $14,892 - - $14,892
Interior - $106,775 $74,494 $11,393 - $192,662
Mechanical - $193,219 $2,242,412 - - $2,435,632
Electrical - - $60,398 $25,744 - $86,142
Plumbing - - $96,882 $6,420 - $103,302
Fire & Life Safety $110,106 $68,128 - - - $178,234
Technology - $52,104 $524,022 - - $576,126
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $149,903 $57,475 - $207,378
Other $228,868 - $162,817 - $473,908 $865,593
Total $338,974 $421,776 $3,408,419 $101,031 $473,908 $4,744,109
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

130
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pleasant Hill ES
Page 100
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

131 Lucy Read Pre-K School Grades Served PK (Pre-K)


2608 RichCreek Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1961 No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 64,644 9,216 73,860
Area (GSF) per student 127 18 145
Number of Classrooms 23 7 30
Permanent Capacity 393
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 509
Utilization (by enrollment) 130% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 393
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 393 Perm Buildings 64,644 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 510 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1961 61,575 11.3%
Building B 1 1961 3,069 6.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 98

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,034,762*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $1,365 - - $1,365
Exterior - - $51,949 - - $51,949
Interior - - $118,391 $10,593 - $128,985
Mechanical - $576,178 $13,501 - - $589,679
Electrical - $156,212 $242,226 $34,575 - $433,012
Plumbing - - $138,641 $3,211 - $141,852
Fire & Life Safety $119,486 $70,631 $2,617 - - $192,735
Technology - $40,408 $395,364 - - $435,772
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $26,858 $65,901 - $92,758
Other $71,846 - $230,214 - $9,470 $311,530
Total $191,332 $843,430 $1,221,125 $154,414 $9,470 $2,419,771
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

131
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lucy Read Pre-K
Page 101
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

132 Reilly Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


405 Denson Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1954 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 41,646 6,144 47,790
Area (GSF) per student 141 21 161
Number of Classrooms 20 8 28
Permanent Capacity 318
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 296
Utilization (by enrollment) 93% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 357 -39
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 112%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 366 -48 Perm Buildings 41,646 28.5%
2010-11 In Migration 045 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 100 Building A 1 1954 41,646 32.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.8
Parking Spaces 45

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $54,280 $40,134 - $99,019 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,182,946*
Roofing - $81,281 - - - $81,281
Structural - $77,800 - - - $77,800
Exterior - - $369,460 - - $369,460
Interior - $32,360 $97,077 $48,191 - $177,628
Mechanical - $309,403 $1,367,980 - - $1,677,383
Electrical - $176,548 $85,634 $41,902 - $304,084
Plumbing $291,538 - $121,730 $5,350 - $418,619
Fire & Life Safety $66,358 $57,152 - - - $123,510
Technology - $46,630 $306,036 - - $352,667
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $50,064 $67,475 - $117,538
Other $39,270 - $206,426 - $11,517 $257,213
Total $397,166 $785,780 $2,658,687 $203,051 $11,517 $4,056,202
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

132
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Reilly ES
Page 102
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

133 Ridgetop Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


5005 Caswell Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78751 1939 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 35,585 4,608 40,193
Area (GSF) per student 162 21 184
Number of Classrooms 13 6 19
Permanent Capacity 206
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 219
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 128 78
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 62%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 131 75 Perm Buildings 35,585 31.4%
2010-11 In Migration 147 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 056 Building A 1 1939 35,185 32.0%
Building B 1 1939 400 8.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 5.0
Parking Spaces 32

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $267,544 $75,461 - - $343,005 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,330,337*
Roofing - - $3,940 - - $3,940
Structural - - $4,502 - - $4,502
Exterior - - $21,397 - - $21,397
Interior - $42,710 $29,297 $451,012 - $523,019
Mechanical - $598,001 $759,217 - - $1,357,218
Electrical - $157,434 $62,616 $3,642 - $223,693
Plumbing - - $150,484 $22,463 - $172,948
Fire & Life Safety $71,510 $53,744 - - - $125,254
Technology - $45,420 $154,913 - - $200,332
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $101,584 $422,259 - $523,843
Other $93,975 - $164,484 - $22,541 $281,000
Total $165,485 $1,164,852 $1,527,895 $899,377 $22,541 $3,780,150
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

133
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ridgetop ES
Page 103
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

174 Rodriguez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


4400 Franklin Park Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1999 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,918 16,932 96,850
Area (GSF) per student 88 19 106
Number of Classrooms 44 22 66
Permanent Capacity 711
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 910
Utilization (by enrollment) 128% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,045 -334
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 147%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,062 -351 Perm Buildings 79,918 8.0%
2010-11 In Migration 079 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 202 Building A 1 1999 69,914 7.7%
Classroom 1 2006 10,004 8.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.0
Parking Spaces 114

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $7,621 $141,062 $42,669 - $191,353 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $565,395*
Roofing - - $985 - - $985
Structural - $238 - - - $238
Exterior - - $534 - - $534
Interior - $132,079 $110,219 $11,709 - $254,006
Mechanical - $62,720 $21,281 - - $84,001
Electrical - - $36,759 $32,319 - $69,078
Plumbing - - $86,792 $9,631 - $96,424
Fire & Life Safety $149,657 $81,989 - - - $231,647
Technology - $50,944 $639,948 - - $690,892
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $163,736 $209,404 - $373,140
Other $80,146 - $236,132 - $64,181 $380,459
Total $229,804 $335,591 $1,437,448 $305,732 $64,181 $2,372,756
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

174
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Rodriguez ES
Page 104
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

127 Sanchez Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


73 San Marcos Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1976 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 78,131 6,144 84,275
Area (GSF) per student 134 11 144
Number of Classrooms 36 8 44
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 585
Utilization (by enrollment) 101% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 584 -4
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 644 -64 Perm Buildings 78,131 26.5%
2010-11 In Migration 074 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 061 Building A 1 1976 78,131 28.7%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.2
Parking Spaces 70

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,177 - $71,710 $40,134 - $113,020 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,696,487*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $387 $1,716 - - $2,103
Interior - - $628,109 $114,615 - $742,724
Mechanical - $3,146,518 $312,872 - - $3,459,390
Electrical - $254,788 $574,116 $54,024 - $882,927
Plumbing - - $166,317 $21,394 - $187,711
Fire & Life Safety $102,706 $64,720 - - - $167,425
Technology - $60,612 $519,647 - - $580,259
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $151,094 $110,084 - $261,178
Other $65,580 - $174,732 - $2,934,744 $3,175,056
Total $169,463 $3,527,025 $2,600,313 $340,250 $2,934,744 $9,571,794
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

127
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sanchez ES
Page 105
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

136 St. Elmo Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


600 W. St. Elmo Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1960 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 48,212 3,072 51,284
Area (GSF) per student 159 10 169
Number of Classrooms 26 4 30
Permanent Capacity 411
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 304
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 369 42
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 90%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 361 50 Perm Buildings 48,212 41.2%
2010-11 In Migration 029 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 094 Building A 1 1960 48,212 40.6%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.4
Parking Spaces 60

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $797 $48,045 $82,803 - $131,645 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,198,396*
Roofing - $42,906 - - - $42,906
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $1,484,314 - - $1,484,314
Interior - $21,355 $168,428 $14,646 - $204,429
Mechanical - $354,726 $754,316 - - $1,109,042
Electrical - $156,212 $277,126 $40,873 - $474,211
Plumbing - - $1,362,172 $28,881 - $1,391,053
Fire & Life Safety $79,866 $57,477 - - - $137,343
Technology - $48,230 $344,348 - - $392,579
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $166,565 $71,399 - $237,964
Other $436,826 - $244,366 - $1,342,548 $2,023,740
Total $516,693 $681,703 $4,849,681 $238,602 $1,342,548 $7,629,227
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

136
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
St. Elmo ES
Page 106
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

139 Sims Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1203 Springdale Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78721 1956 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,337 6,144 50,481
Area (GSF) per student 160 22 182
Number of Classrooms 22 8 30
Permanent Capacity 355
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 277
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 343 12
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 97%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 359 -4 Perm Buildings 44,337 39.4%
2010-11 In Migration 016 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 084 Building A 1 1956 12,434 55.6%
Building B 1 1961 17,056 35.3%
Site Data Building C 1 1956 2,482 36.3%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 8.4 Building D 1 1956 4,570 57.8%
Parking Spaces 66 Building E 1 1956 7,503 32.4%
Building F 1 1956 292 81.0%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $31,481 $130,753 $129,820 - $292,054 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,554,022*
Roofing - $216,011 $10,801 - - $226,812
Structural - $7,498 - - - $7,498
Exterior - $327 $28,402 $2,221 - $30,950
Interior - $85,420 $210,519 $10,727 - $306,666
Mechanical - - $1,539,650 - - $1,539,650
Electrical - $178,641 $630,997 $31,881 - $841,520
Plumbing $650,388 - $840,920 $12,837 - $1,504,145
Fire & Life Safety $83,676 $58,028 - - - $141,704
Technology - $47,124 $339,322 - - $386,446
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $194,276 $86,504 - $280,780
Other $195,428 - $165,575 - $868,224 $1,229,226
Total $929,492 $624,530 $4,091,216 $273,990 $868,224 $6,787,451
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

139
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sims ES
Page 107
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

138 Summitt Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


12207 Brigadoon Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78727 1986 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 75,902 10,752 86,654
Area (GSF) per student 89 13 101
Number of Classrooms 41 14 55
Permanent Capacity 732
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 854
Utilization (by enrollment) 117% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 623 109
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 662 70 Perm Buildings 75,902 25.2%
2010-11 In Migration 288 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 057 Building A 1 1986 65,936 28.9%
Building B 1 1989 9,966 24.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.5
Parking Spaces 107

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $131,854 - - $131,854 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $870,328*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - $7,415 $302,725 $108,624 - $418,765
Mechanical $4,837 $224,061 $3,173,464 - - $3,402,362
Electrical $1,224 - $276,089 $27,883 - $305,196
Plumbing $67,453 - $160,639 $18,257 - $246,348
Fire & Life Safety $130,660 $75,368 - - - $206,028
Technology - $54,765 $631,730 - - $686,495
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $140,477 $103,664 - $244,141
Other $254,903 - $538,644 - $177,876 $971,423
Total $459,077 $411,250 $5,355,622 $258,428 $177,876 $6,662,254
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

138
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Summitt ES
Page 108
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

158 Sunset Valley Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3000 Jones Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1971 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 66,467 3,072 69,539
Area (GSF) per student 147 7 154
Number of Classrooms 35 2 37
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 451
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 483 78
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 86%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 543 18 Perm Buildings 66,467 42.3%
2010-11 In Migration 099 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 135 Building A 1 1971 57,298 50.9%
Building B 1 1996 9,169 11.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.4
Parking Spaces 86

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $23,148 $223,578 - - $246,726 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,972,404*
Roofing - - $2,043,970 - - $2,043,970
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $22,439 - - $22,439
Interior - $42,710 $230,079 $81,622 - $354,411
Mechanical - $2,514,744 $1,388,745 - - $3,903,489
Electrical $5,012 $97,298 $389,217 $31,881 - $523,409
Plumbing - - $485,597 $16,046 - $501,643
Fire & Life Safety $104,397 $71,096 $2,617 - - $178,109
Technology - $52,638 $514,926 - - $567,564
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $98,494 $106,358 - $204,852
Other $61,362 - $150,333 - $2,385,867 $2,597,562
Total $170,770 $2,801,633 $5,549,996 $235,908 $2,385,867 $11,144,175
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

158
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Sunset Valley ES
Page 109
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

140 Travis Heights Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


2010 Alameda Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1938 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 59,589 4,608 64,197
Area (GSF) per student 111 9 120
Number of Classrooms 31 6 37
Permanent Capacity 486
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 537
Utilization (by enrollment) 110% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 548 -62
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 605 -119 Perm Buildings 59,589 36.6%
2010-11 In Migration 109 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 117 Building A 1 1938 40,576 39.7%
Building B 1 1985 4,992 35.5%
Site Data Building C 1 1994 14,021 20.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.2
Parking Spaces 44

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $223,178 $188,278 $2,109 $1,112 - $414,676 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,445,212*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $2,778 $321,483 - $324,261
Interior - $64,065 $158,357 $67,889 - $290,311
Mechanical - $1,907,086 $694,812 - - $2,601,898
Electrical $708 $201,183 $385,584 $14,099 - $601,574
Plumbing $206,194 - $591,645 $14,976 - $812,815
Fire & Life Safety $99,299 $63,515 - - - $162,814
Technology - $56,634 $494,206 - - $550,839
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $79,247 $85,654 - $164,901
Other $435,073 - $626,691 - $1,545,119 $2,606,883
Total $964,451 $2,480,760 $3,035,427 $505,213 $1,545,119 $8,530,971
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

140
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Travis Heights ES
Page 110
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

141 Walnut Creek Elementary School Grades Served K-6 (ES)


401 W. Braker Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1961 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 79,536 16,896 96,432
Area (GSF) per student 87 18 105
Number of Classrooms 41 21 62
Permanent Capacity 655
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 916
Utilization (by enrollment) 140% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 936 -282
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 143%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,002 -348 Perm Buildings 79,536 15.3%
2010-11 In Migration 060 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 094 Building A 1 1961 45,037 27.3%
Building B 1 1999 34,499 5.6%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.5
Parking Spaces 94

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $67,837 - - $72,444 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,535,934*
Roofing $1,499 $141,304 - - - $142,803
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $2,925 - $837,033 - - $839,957
Interior $610 $3,560 $53,758 $57,599 - $115,526
Mechanical - $654,561 $482,290 - - $1,136,851
Electrical $1,224 $216,949 $268,133 $18,535 - $504,841
Plumbing $139,018 - $139,251 $5,350 - $283,619
Fire & Life Safety $149,776 $81,314 - - - $231,090
Technology - $55,279 $601,051 - - $656,330
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $157,043 $118,152 - $275,195
Other $83,310 - $44,022 - $10,090 $137,422
Total $378,361 $1,157,572 $2,650,418 $199,636 $10,090 $4,396,078
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

141
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Walnut Creek ES
Page 111
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

175 Widen Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


5605 Nuckols Crossing Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 74,523 15,360 89,883
Area (GSF) per student 97 20 117
Number of Classrooms 42 20 62
Permanent Capacity 673
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 769
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 794 -121
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 118%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 780 -107 Perm Buildings 74,523 12.9%
2010-11 In Migration 077 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 086 Building A 1 1986 63,666 15.5%
Building B 1 1989 10,857 7.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.7
Parking Spaces 92

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $121,427 $4,049 - $125,476 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $864,638*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural $1,801 - $1,474 $2,648 - $5,923
Exterior - $2,640 $13,732 - - $16,372
Interior - $106,775 $133,079 $87,980 - $327,835
Mechanical $1,766 $136,930 $601,976 - - $740,673
Electrical - $137,522 $136,454 $11,802 - $285,779
Plumbing - $748 $134,172 $8,562 - $143,482
Fire & Life Safety $152,816 $80,016 $2,617 - - $235,450
Technology - $55,257 $615,502 - - $670,759
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $292,213 $92,380 - $384,593
Other $188,366 - $334,723 - $244,825 $767,913
Total $344,749 $519,889 $2,387,370 $207,421 $244,825 $3,704,253
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

175
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Widen ES
Page 112
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

166 Williams Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


500 Mairo Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 1976 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 64,846 9,216 74,062
Area (GSF) per student 101 14 115
Number of Classrooms 35 12 47
Permanent Capacity 561
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 642
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 640 -79
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 114%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 621 -60 Perm Buildings 64,846 36.9%
2010-11 In Migration 130 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 133 Building A 1 1976 64,846 40.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.0
Parking Spaces 107

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $132,390 $129,820 - $262,210 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,203,762*
Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $37,251 $223,445 - $260,696
Interior - $106,775 $464,627 $11,930 - $583,332
Mechanical - $3,364,894 $124,994 - - $3,489,887
Electrical - $156,212 $812,293 $46,853 - $1,015,358
Plumbing - - $812,938 $60,184 - $873,122
Fire & Life Safety $114,412 $68,848 - - - $183,260
Technology - $51,800 $522,926 - - $574,726
Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207
Specialties $24,162 - $202,571 $162,006 - $388,740
Other $68,453 - $183,741 - $2,107,462 $2,359,655
Total $207,027 $3,996,735 $3,314,316 $634,239 $2,107,462 $10,259,778
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

166
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Williams ES
Page 113
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

157 Winn Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


3500 Susquehanna Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1970 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 62,087 4,608 66,695
Area (GSF) per student 134 10 144
Number of Classrooms 33 6 39
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 463
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 485 39
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 93%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 531 -7 Perm Buildings 62,087 22.5%
2010-11 In Migration 044 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 082 Building A 1 1970 52,117 21.7%
Building B 1 1990 9,970 21.1%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 10.0
Parking Spaces 66

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $1,255 - $107,297 $40,134 - $148,686 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,207,781*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - $2,248 - - - $2,248
Exterior - - $10,312 - - $10,312
Interior - $42,710 $212,677 $189,878 - $445,265
Mechanical - $458,519 $777,108 - - $1,235,627
Electrical - $139,476 $136,299 $36,239 - $312,013
Plumbing - - $709,008 $9,629 - $718,637
Fire & Life Safety $100,345 $63,878 - - - $164,223
Technology - $51,835 $479,005 - - $530,840
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $182,446 $84,899 - $267,345
Other $347,515 - $281,701 - $6,696,886 $7,326,101
Total $449,115 $758,666 $2,895,852 $360,778 $6,696,886 $11,161,297
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

157
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Winn ES
Page 114
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

152 Wooldridge Elementary School Grades Served K-5 (ES)


1412 Norseman Terrace Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 1969 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 68,543 19,968 88,511
Area (GSF) per student 78 23 101
Number of Classrooms 33 26 59
Permanent Capacity 524
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 878
Utilization (by enrollment) 168% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,160 -636
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 222%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,255 -731 Perm Buildings 68,543 23.0%
2010-11 In Migration 061 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 342 Building A 1 1969 58,805 32.1%
Building B 1 1998 9,738 13.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.6
Parking Spaces 60

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $4,606 $31,668 $64,475 - $100,749 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,461,020*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $56,049 - - $56,049
Interior - - $111,004 $148,224 - $259,227
Mechanical - $1,627,867 $459,905 - - $2,087,773
Electrical - $9,816 $606,219 $55,369 - $671,404
Plumbing $304,637 - $965,135 $10,698 - $1,280,469
Fire & Life Safety $141,507 $85,010 - - - $226,517
Technology - $52,683 $500,564 - - $553,247
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $245,253 $66,737 - $311,991
Other $234,894 - $282,741 - $3,072 $520,707
Total $681,037 $1,779,983 $3,258,538 $345,503 $3,072 $6,068,132
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

152
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Wooldridge ES
Page 115
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

144 Wooten Elementary School Grades Served PK-5 (ES)


1406 Dale Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1955 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 53,689 18,432 72,121
Area (GSF) per student 77 27 104
Number of Classrooms 29 22 51
Permanent Capacity 468
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 695
Utilization (by enrollment) 149% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 672 -205
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 144%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 737 -270 Perm Buildings 53,689 51.2%
2010-11 In Migration 125 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 093 Building A 1 1955 53,689 63.2%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 6.7
Parking Spaces 37

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,112 $629,572 $322,375 - $953,059 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,243,830*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $1,537 $5,198 $776,990 - - $783,726
Interior - $206,992 $235,337 $44,338 - $486,667
Mechanical - $37,918 $2,705,775 - - $2,743,693
Electrical - $1,407,108 $60,569 $11,248 - $1,478,925
Plumbing $595,605 $1,211,680 $640,145 $31,163 - $2,478,594
Fire & Life Safety $119,270 $71,393 - - - $190,662
Technology - $48,984 $471,209 - - $520,193
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $150,539 $132,609 - $283,148
Other $437,749 - $518,995 - $1,429,495 $2,386,239
Total $1,154,161 $3,089,669 $6,189,133 $541,732 $1,429,495 $12,404,189
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

144
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Wooten ES
Page 116
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

145 Zavala Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


310 Robert Martinez, Jr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1937 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 69,333 69,333
Area (GSF) per student 170 0 170
Number of Classrooms 36 0 36
Permanent Capacity 580
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 407
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 347 233
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 60%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 353 227 Perm Buildings 69,333 32.8%
2010-11 In Migration 082 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 043 Building A 1 1937 69,333 32.5%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.4
Parking Spaces 12

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $1,196 $285,274 - - $286,470 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,284,691*
Roofing - $798 - - - $798
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $38,935 $14,187 - $53,122
Interior - - $260,945 $236,385 - $497,329
Mechanical - $184,809 $1,186,825 - - $1,371,633
Electrical $5,100 $89,265 $578,418 $65,592 - $738,375
Plumbing $571,041 - $1,984,992 $6,420 - $2,562,453
Fire & Life Safety $100,572 $64,748 $2,617 - - $167,937
Technology - $56,381 $504,384 - - $560,765
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - $13,163 $163,406 $91,473 - $268,041
Other $197,619 - $56,846 - $19,700 $274,164
Total $874,332 $410,359 $5,062,642 $414,056 $19,700 $6,781,088
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

145
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Zavala ES
Page 117
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

146 Zilker Elementary School Grades Served PK-6 (ES)


1900 Bluebonnet Lane Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1950 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 50,941 10,752 61,693
Area (GSF) per student 98 21 118
Number of Classrooms 26 14 40
Permanent Capacity 460
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 522
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 338 122
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 74%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 358 102 Perm Buildings 50,941 56.4%
2010-11 In Migration 204 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 018 Building A 1 1950 42,029 69.2%
Gymnasium 1 1961 2,827 49.5%
Site Data Library 1 1990 5,488 24.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 11.8 Vocational 1 1950 597 53.3%
Parking Spaces 54

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $720,410 $210,344 - $930,754 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,874,015*
Roofing - $1,307,652 $59,313 - - $1,366,966
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $28,203 - $338,242 - - $366,445
Interior - $22,794 $233,891 $434,142 - $690,827
Mechanical - $204,753 $2,049,476 - - $2,254,229
Electrical - $83,685 $466,878 $23,564 - $574,127
Plumbing $445,897 $251,267 $1,401,699 $9,629 - $2,108,492
Fire & Life Safety $98,303 $63,990 $2,617 - - $164,909
Technology - $44,347 $360,804 - - $405,151
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $182,402 $98,504 - $280,906
Other $323,124 - $884,203 - $2,565,129 $3,772,456
Total $895,527 $1,978,488 $6,699,936 $776,182 $2,565,129 $12,915,262
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

146
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Zilker ES
Page 118
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

059 Bailey Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


4020 Lost Oasis Hollow Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78739 1993 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 148,143 10,752 158,895
Area (GSF) per student 142 10 153
Number of Classrooms 56 11 67
Permanent Capacity 1,176
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,041
Utilization (by enrollment) 89% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 979 197
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,048 128 Perm Buildings 148,143 16.4%
2010-11 In Migration 196 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 129 Building A 1 1993 148,143 15.1%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Parking Spaces 138

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $16,193 $27,289 $824,676 - $868,157 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,025,915*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $220,269 $192,392 - $412,661
Interior - $149,485 $94,214 $72,955 - $316,654
Mechanical $14,691 $1,769,423 $1,889,503 - - $3,673,618
Electrical - - $242,830 $3,406 - $246,236
Plumbing - - $236,111 $24,615 $1,568 $262,294
Fire & Life Safety $233,448 $125,051 $14,217 - - $372,716
Technology - $197,531 $972,186 - - $1,169,717
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $161,190 $142,753 - $303,943
Other $470,451 - $392,173 - $173,780 $1,036,404
Total $718,590 $2,307,324 $4,249,984 $1,260,797 $175,348 $8,712,044
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

059
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bailey MS
Page 119
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

054 Bedichek Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


6800 Bill Hughes Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1972 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 130,600 27,018 157,618
Area (GSF) per student 124 26 150
Number of Classrooms 48 31 79
Permanent Capacity 941
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,054
Utilization (by enrollment) 112% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,219 -278
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 130%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,340 -399 Perm Buildings 130,600 30.6%
2010-11 In Migration 100 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 248 Building A 1 1972 91,844 32.0%
Gymnasium 1 1972 28,847 55.2%
Site Data Building C 1 1997 9,909 5.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.3
Parking Spaces 140

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $192,275 $824,676 - $1,016,951 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $9,999,588*
Roofing - $849,916 - - - $849,916
Structural - $11,113 - - - $11,113
Exterior - - $2,951 - - $2,951
Interior $224 $192,195 $807,140 $331,731 - $1,331,290
Mechanical $5,200,844 $2,584,586 $1,231,358 - - $9,016,787
Electrical - - $554,802 $92,282 - $647,084
Plumbing - - $417,426 $30,027 - $447,452
Fire & Life Safety $305,625 $162,630 $10,469 - - $478,724
Technology - $97,631 $886,402 - - $984,033
Conveyances $214,837 $49,641 - - - $264,479
Specialties - - $90,013 $238,298 - $328,311
Other $330,347 - $96,558 - $13,820,241 $14,247,146
Total $6,051,876 $3,947,712 $4,289,394 $1,517,014 $13,820,241 $29,626,237
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

054
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bedichek MS
Page 120
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

046 Burnet Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


8401 Hathaway Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1961 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 137,768 18,432 156,200
Area (GSF) per student 138 18 157
Number of Classrooms 53 22 75
Permanent Capacity 1,039
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 998
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,170 -131
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 113%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,365 -326 Perm Buildings 137,768 34.5%
2010-11 In Migration 060 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 203 Building A 1 1961 136,743 37.5%
Mechanical 1 1969 1,025 0.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 23.7
Parking Spaces 50

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $106,911 - $1,052,251 - $1,159,162 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $7,925,349*
Roofing - - $2,095,309 - - $2,095,309
Structural - $3,472 $868 - - $4,340
Exterior - $127,204 $7,663 - - $134,868
Interior - $219,280 $300,419 $20,695 - $540,393
Mechanical - $6,231,657 $1,586,077 - - $7,817,734
Electrical - $284,750 $2,562,829 $72,232 - $2,919,811
Plumbing $332,126 $3,631 $256,340 $28,960 - $621,057
Fire & Life Safety $217,661 $119,840 $2,617 - - $340,118
Technology - $82,434 $854,942 - - $937,377
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $398,072 $287,254 - $685,326
Other $146,741 - $176,985 - $1,228,083 $1,551,810
Total $696,528 $7,228,821 $8,242,121 $1,461,392 $1,228,083 $18,856,946
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

046
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Burnet MS
Page 121
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

057 Covington Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


3700 Convict Hill Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 173,636 4,608 178,244
Area (GSF) per student 216 6 221
Number of Classrooms 63 5 68
Permanent Capacity 1,323
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 805
Utilization (by enrollment) 61% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 905 418
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 984 339 Perm Buildings 173,636 18.7%
2010-11 In Migration 181 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 260 Building A 1 1986 134,657 18.9%
Auditorium 1 1986 20,672 20.3%
Site Data Vocational 1 1986 18,307 18.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 21.3
Parking Spaces 122

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $243 $220,213 $79,540 - $299,996 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,753,039*
Roofing - $165,465 $1,050 - - $166,514
Structural - - $1,775 - - $1,775
Exterior - $6,006 $31,080 - - $37,086
Interior - $21,355 $126,060 $187,566 - $334,981
Mechanical $271,148 $2,997,320 $2,777,473 - - $6,045,940
Electrical - $297,742 $374,659 $66,064 - $738,464
Plumbing - - $366,484 $31,967 - $398,450
Fire & Life Safety $247,938 $156,334 $33,669 - - $437,941
Technology - $97,536 $975,699 - - $1,073,235
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $218,812 $314,103 - $532,914
Other $442,312 - $330,814 - $1,960,490 $2,733,617
Total $961,398 $3,791,641 $5,457,787 $679,240 $1,960,490 $12,850,556
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

057
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Covington MS
Page 122
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

055 Dobie Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


1200 E. Rundberg Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78753 1973 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 134,563 6,144 140,707
Area (GSF) per student 214 10 223
Number of Classrooms 46 8 54
Permanent Capacity 902
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 630
Utilization (by enrollment) 70% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 719 183
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 80%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 828 74 Perm Buildings 134,563 15.2%
2010-11 In Migration 063 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 130 Building A 1 1973 123,999 14.0%
Building B 1 2006 10,564 8.3%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.2
Parking Spaces 120

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $229,980 $779,468 - $1,009,448 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,851,474*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $15,417 - - - - $15,417
Interior $42,171 $6,076 $648,770 $22,550 - $719,567
Mechanical $274,000 $505,060 $550,219 - - $1,329,279
Electrical $22,712 $200,845 $696,953 $26,695 - $947,204
Plumbing $86,955 - $532,071 $38,660 - $657,686
Fire & Life Safety $205,797 $104,739 $7,852 - - $318,388
Technology - $116,153 $817,034 - - $933,187
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $300,442 $286,623 - $587,065
Other $172,266 - $209,938 - $6,327,599 $6,709,803
Total $819,317 $1,032,156 $3,993,260 $1,153,996 $6,327,599 $13,326,328
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

055
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Dobie MS
Page 123
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

043 Fulmore Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


201 East Mary Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1911 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 159,699 7,680 167,379
Area (GSF) per student 161 8 168
Number of Classrooms 55 9 64
Permanent Capacity 1,078
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 995
Utilization (by enrollment) 92% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 850 228
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 79%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 990 88 Perm Buildings 159,699 40.6%
2010-11 In Migration 295 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 138 Building A 1 1911 72,664 46.9%
Cafeteria 1 1980 55,143 40.8%
Site Data Vocational 1 1980 18,500 56.1%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.8 Building D 1 2002 13,392 8.0%
Parking Spaces 85

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $3,001 $4,218 $435,203 $16,796 - $459,218 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $9,580,793*
Roofing $4,239 - $30,865 - - $35,104
Structural - $3,151 $33,724 - - $36,876
Exterior - $2,011 $115,027 - - $117,038
Interior - $55,906 $611,384 $484,733 - $1,152,023
Mechanical - $7,512,668 $1,845,434 - - $9,358,102
Electrical - $5,580 $4,806,824 $574,802 - $5,387,205
Plumbing $563,639 - $1,384,084 $103,215 - $2,050,938
Fire & Life Safety $237,738 $150,179 $35,577 - - $423,494
Technology - $122,392 $973,199 - - $1,095,590
Conveyances - $49,641 $8,858 - - $58,499
Specialties - - $150,593 $341,284 - $491,878
Other $866,429 - $694,429 - $353,775 $1,914,633
Total $1,675,047 $7,905,746 $11,125,201 $1,520,831 $353,775 $22,580,600
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

043
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Fulmore MS
Page 124
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

056 Garcia Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


7414 Johnny Morris Rd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 2008 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 160,764 160,764
Area (GSF) per student 244 0 244
Number of Classrooms 62 0 62
Permanent Capacity 1,215
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 658
Utilization (by enrollment) 54% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 829 386
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 68%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 901 314 Perm Buildings 160,764 4.7%
2010-11 In Migration 027 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 2008 160,764 4.8%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.3
Parking Spaces 160

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - - - $0 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $717,098*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $105,789 $65,660 - $171,449
Mechanical - $133,965 - - - $133,965
Electrical - - $86,118 $4,515 - $90,633
Plumbing - - $116,926 $30,029 - $146,955
Fire & Life Safety $341,779 $83,119 $38,970 - - $463,868
Technology - $108,594 $1,089,676 - - $1,198,270
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $39,734 $156,485 - $196,219
Other - - - - - $0
Total $341,779 $375,320 $1,477,213 $256,690 $0 $2,451,001
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

056
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Garcia MS
Page 125
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

062 Gorzycki Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


7412 West Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 2009 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 175,543 175,543
Area (GSF) per student 182 0 182
Number of Classrooms 63 0 63
Permanent Capacity 1,323
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 963
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 989 334
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 75%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,071 252 Perm Buildings 175,543 4.6%
2010-11 In Migration 108 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 132 Building A 1 2009 175,543 4.7%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.2
Parking Spaces 160

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - $40,134 - $40,134 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $640,006*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - - - - $0
Interior - - $108,064 $73,924 - $181,987
Mechanical - $103,990 $20,852 - - $124,842
Electrical - - $127,097 $2,376 - $129,472
Plumbing - - $157,202 $18,190 - $175,392
Fire & Life Safety $309,464 $87,857 $5,235 - - $402,556
Technology - $138,695 $1,099,309 - - $1,238,004
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $33,711 $300,646 - $334,357
Other - - - - - $0
Total $309,464 $330,542 $1,551,469 $435,269 $0 $2,626,743
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

062
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Gorzycki MS
Page 126
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

044 Kealing Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


1607 Pennsylvania Ave. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1986 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 192,181 192,181
Area (GSF) per student 156 0 156
Number of Classrooms 80 0 80
Permanent Capacity 1,568
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,233
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 541 1,027
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 35%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 614 954 Perm Buildings 192,181 18.6%
2010-11 In Migration 806 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 064 Building A 1 1986 101,579 20.4%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1986 55,783 24.8%
Site Data Building C 1 2007 34,819 3.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.2
Parking Spaces 160

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $82,009 $322,375 - $404,383 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,350,903*
Roofing - $3,999,808 - - - $3,999,808
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $129,828 - - $129,828
Interior - $30,226 $364,771 $127,864 - $522,860
Mechanical - $414,668 $2,119,963 - - $2,534,631
Electrical $67,252 $180,541 $313,476 $33,349 - $594,617
Plumbing - - $503,134 $28,962 - $532,097
Fire & Life Safety $260,502 $149,268 $44,560 - - $454,330
Technology - $150,808 $1,362,779 - - $1,513,586
Conveyances $8,858 $49,641 - - - $58,499
Specialties - - $179,106 $449,683 - $628,789
Other $39,330 - $284,944 - $464,321 $788,595
Total $375,942 $4,974,961 $5,384,570 $962,232 $464,321 $12,162,026
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

044
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Kealing MS
Page 127
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

045 Lamar Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


6201 Wynona Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78757 1955 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 121,371 4,608 125,979
Area (GSF) per student 201 8 209
Number of Classrooms 48 4 52
Permanent Capacity 1,008
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 604
Utilization (by enrollment) 60% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 583 425
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 58%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 642 366 Perm Buildings 121,371 19.3%
2010-11 In Migration 223 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 191 Building A 1 1955 104,981 20.2%
Band 1 2000 9,032 6.0%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 5,354 8.3%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.3 Mechanical 1 2000 2,004 0.1%
Parking Spaces 106

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $5,195 - $29,823 $869,155 - $904,172 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,730,973*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural $9,432 - $39,783 - - $49,215
Exterior $898 $433,743 - - - $434,641
Interior - $85,501 $243,886 $24,393 - $353,780
Mechanical $290,910 $1,247,215 $700,617 - - $2,238,742
Electrical $197,826 $307,218 $139,583 $47,865 - $692,493
Plumbing $2,903 $557,289 $864,148 $18,193 - $1,442,532
Fire & Life Safety $169,084 $115,092 $17,966 - - $302,142
Technology - $116,800 $852,286 - - $969,086
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $121,330 $149,732 - $271,062
Other $191,867 - $230,959 - $19,344 $442,170
Total $868,115 $2,862,857 $3,240,381 $1,109,337 $19,344 $8,100,034
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

045
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lamar MS
Page 128
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

051 Martin Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


1601 Haskell Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1966 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 107,983 10,752 118,735
Area (GSF) per student 169 17 186
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Permanent Capacity 804
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 639
Utilization (by enrollment) 79% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,056 -252
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 131%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,184 -380 Perm Buildings 107,983 28.8%
2010-11 In Migration 075 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 429 Building A 1 1966 55,290 36.4%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1966 52,693 26.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 9.9
Parking Spaces 94

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $775 $85,474 $86,678 - $172,927 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $6,538,211*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $1,395 $8,681 - $10,075
Exterior - $435 $50,001 $112,643 - $163,079
Interior - $109,213 $899,675 $43,981 - $1,052,869
Mechanical $224,290 $4,838,987 $340,715 - - $5,403,992
Electrical - $694,824 $667,931 $35,746 - $1,398,501
Plumbing - $60,523 $832,467 $36,516 - $929,506
Fire & Life Safety $182,171 $101,186 $16,480 - - $299,837
Technology - $103,356 $719,130 - - $822,486
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $99,298 $306,386 - $405,683
Other $123,167 - $325,108 - $3,297,183 $3,745,458
Total $529,628 $6,008,583 $4,037,673 $630,629 $3,297,183 $14,503,696
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

051
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Martin MS
Page 129
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

058 Mendez Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


5106 Village Square Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78744 1987 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 173,382 13,824 187,206
Area (GSF) per student 195 16 210
Number of Classrooms 62 18 80
Permanent Capacity 1,215
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 890
Utilization (by enrollment) 73% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,266 -51
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 104%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,373 -158 Perm Buildings 173,382 15.0%
2010-11 In Migration 027 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 396 Building A 1 1987 135,158 13.4%
Auditorium 1 1987 20,672 15.0%
Site Data Vocational 1 1987 17,552 20.4%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 20.7
Parking Spaces 139

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $3,144 $30,858 $482,213 - $516,215 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,149,951*
Roofing - $5,877 - - - $5,877
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $193 $3,653 $25,747 - $29,594
Interior - $60,254 $235,743 $17,936 - $313,933
Mechanical $412,860 $3,475,928 $10,551 - - $3,899,338
Electrical - $132,718 $1,017,416 $26,774 - $1,176,907
Plumbing - - $154,472 $36,518 - $190,990
Fire & Life Safety $271,136 $157,700 $58,777 - - $487,613
Technology - $125,787 $1,090,662 - - $1,216,449
Conveyances - $108,141 - - - $108,141
Specialties - - $153,510 $314,681 - $468,191
Other $396,215 - $406,857 - $1,830,512 $2,633,585
Total $1,080,210 $4,069,741 $3,162,498 $903,869 $1,830,512 $11,046,831
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

058
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Mendez MS
Page 130
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

052 Murchison Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


3700 North Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78731 1967 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 123,348 16,256 139,604
Area (GSF) per student 96 13 109
Number of Classrooms 53 20 73
Permanent Capacity 1,113
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,281
Utilization (by enrollment) 115% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,171 -58
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 105%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,301 -188 Perm Buildings 123,348 19.9%
2010-11 In Migration 220 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 110 Building A 1 1967 105,457 25.8%
Building B 1 1998 16,628 6.1%
Site Data Storage 1 1987 367
Gross Site Area (Acres) 26.2 Greenhouse 1 1979 896 11.5%
Parking Spaces 124

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $17,512 - - $17,512 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,108,676*
Roofing - $928,708 - - - $928,708
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $5,383 $337 - - $5,720
Interior - $170,840 $149,672 $724,559 - $1,045,070
Mechanical $32,241 $303,841 $3,101,002 - - $3,437,084
Electrical - - $793,680 $63,925 - $857,604
Plumbing $86,955 - $396,795 $25,685 - $509,434
Fire & Life Safety $214,865 $135,922 $41,521 - - $392,308
Technology - $78,856 $882,096 - - $960,952
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $340,986 $225,844 - $566,830
Other $151,066 - $228,101 - $8,153,256 $8,532,423
Total $485,127 $1,623,549 $5,951,701 $1,040,012 $8,153,256 $17,253,644
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

052
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Murchison MS
Page 131
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

047 O. Henry Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


2610 West 10th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1953 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 124,320 6,144 130,464
Area (GSF) per student 121 6 127
Number of Classrooms 45 8 53
Permanent Capacity 945
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,026
Utilization (by enrollment) 109% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 804 141
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 85%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 897 48 Perm Buildings 124,320 13.3%
2010-11 In Migration 485 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 183 Building A 1 1953 124,320 12.3%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 13.8
Parking Spaces 103

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $532,421 $5,561 - $537,983 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,075,336*
Roofing - - $70,588 - - $70,588
Structural - - $33,856 - - $33,856
Exterior - $725 $49,612 - - $50,337
Interior - $85,420 $158,448 $37,802 - $281,670
Mechanical - $187,659 $89,395 - - $277,054
Electrical - $244,583 $266,248 $86,974 - $597,805
Plumbing - - $2,047,419 $34,313 - $2,081,732
Fire & Life Safety $191,584 $127,909 $15,349 - - $334,841
Technology - $92,335 $808,610 - - $900,945
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $83,741 $204,056 - $287,797
Other $95,479 - $93,514 - $3,270,833 $3,459,826
Total $287,063 $788,273 $4,249,201 $368,706 $3,270,833 $8,964,076
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

047
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
O. Henry MS
Page 132
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

061 Paredes Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


10100 S. Mary Moore Searight Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 2000 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 148,695 6,144 154,839
Area (GSF) per student 160 7 166
Number of Classrooms 59 8 67
Permanent Capacity 1,156
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 930
Utilization (by enrollment) 80% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,165 -9
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 101%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,293 -137 Perm Buildings 148,695 11.0%
2010-11 In Migration 069 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 291 Building A 1 2000 79,374 10.5%
Administration 1 2000 6,002 8.6%
Site Data Building C 1 2000 4,035 29.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 78.2 Cafeteria 1 2000 15,854 4.6%
Parking Spaces 108 Band 1 2000 9,072 9.4%
Gymnasium 1 2000 34,358 5.4%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $99,871 $121,562 $208,564 - $429,998 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,294,994*
Roofing - $36,100 - - - $36,100
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $6,745 - - $6,745
Interior - $30,772 $214,463 $118,134 - $363,369
Mechanical $133,382 $85,083 $18,278 - - $236,742
Electrical - - $449,283 $71,212 - $520,495
Plumbing - - $330,677 $42,936 - $373,613
Fire & Life Safety $228,900 $150,096 $56,160 - - $435,155
Technology - $104,752 $1,036,362 - - $1,141,114
Conveyances - $148,924 - - - $148,924
Specialties - - $93,998 $1,064,189 - $1,158,186
Other $277,115 - $460,476 - $274,674 $1,012,265
Total $639,397 $655,597 $2,788,004 $1,505,034 $274,674 $5,862,705
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

061
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Paredes MS
Page 133
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

048 Pearce Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


6401 N. Hampton Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78723 1958 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 132,596 1,536 134,132
Area (GSF) per student 403 5 408
Number of Classrooms 55 1 56
Permanent Capacity 1,078
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 329
Utilization (by enrollment) 31% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 712 366
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 66%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 846 232 Perm Buildings 132,596 15.0%
2010-11 In Migration 328 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 510 Building A 1 1958 123,959 15.7%
Auditorium 1 1958 8,637 4.4%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 14.8
Parking Spaces 82

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $144,156 $120,754 $79,542 - $344,451 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,266,328*
Roofing - $438,273 - - - $438,273
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $277,949 - - $277,949
Interior - $28,343 $236,543 $120,791 - $385,677
Mechanical $420,778 $582,707 $238,457 - - $1,241,941
Electrical - - $859,515 $42,854 - $902,369
Plumbing - - $1,076,087 $18,193 - $1,094,279
Fire & Life Safety $191,660 $103,728 $17,966 - - $313,354
Technology - $122,320 $849,279 - - $971,599
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $154,528 $176,304 - $330,832
Other $184,723 - $38,956 - $797,883 $1,021,561
Total $797,160 $1,469,168 $3,870,033 $437,683 $797,883 $7,371,927
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

048
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Pearce MS
Page 134
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

028 Ann Richards School Grades Served 6-9 (MS)


2206 Prather Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1958 EX No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 130,240 7,424 137,664
Area (GSF) per student 247 14 261
Number of Classrooms 44 6 50
Permanent Capacity 924
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 528
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 924
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 924 Perm Buildings 130,240 34.3%
2010-11 In Migration 526 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1958 118,655 39.9%
Mechanical 1 1958 1,114 3.4%
Site Data Band 1 1998 3,471 12.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.3 Building D 1 2010 7,000 4.9%
Parking Spaces 90

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $2,658 $92,455 $322,375 - $417,487 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,241,489*
Roofing - $2,660 $1,640,134 - - $1,642,794
Structural $7,066 $10,864 $6,455 - - $24,385
Exterior - - $32,701 - - $32,701
Interior - - $212,810 $181,719 - $394,529
Mechanical - $1,997,171 $4,758,996 - - $6,756,167
Electrical - $195,266 $493,696 $24,159 - $713,121
Plumbing $1,459,762 - $1,955,099 $13,914 - $3,428,775
Fire & Life Safety $201,671 $132,686 $11,600 - - $345,957
Technology - $148,770 $789,429 - - $938,199
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $76,149 $233,139 - $309,289
Other $82,916 - $390,377 - $126,188 $599,481
Total $1,751,415 $2,490,074 $10,459,899 $775,306 $126,188 $15,602,883
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

028
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ann Richards School
Page 135
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

060 Small Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


4801 Monterey Oaks Blvd. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1999 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 160,599 4,608 165,207
Area (GSF) per student 167 5 172
Number of Classrooms 59 4 63
Permanent Capacity 1,239
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 959
Utilization (by enrollment) 77% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 876 363
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 71%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,008 231 Perm Buildings 160,599 6.9%
2010-11 In Migration 183 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 097 Building A 1 1999 160,599 7.0%

Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 36.5
Parking Spaces 108

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $832 - $136,337 - - $137,169 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,400,279*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $4,284 $6,119 - - $10,403
Interior - $64,065 $142,138 $8,628 - $214,831
Mechanical $26,588 $431,732 $42,561 - - $500,882
Electrical - $173,490 $223,754 $31,131 - $428,375
Plumbing - $30,214 $102,766 $41,871 - $174,851
Fire & Life Safety $233,877 $142,267 $8,983 - - $385,126
Technology - $100,499 $1,022,152 - - $1,122,650
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $158,112 $272,576 - $430,688
Other $93,147 - $137,739 - $162,029 $392,915
Total $354,444 $1,045,835 $1,980,661 $354,205 $162,029 $3,897,174
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

060
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Small MS
Page 136
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

053 Webb Middle School Grades Served 6-8 (MS)


601 E. St. Johns Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1961 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 120,987 9,216 130,203
Area (GSF) per student 205 16 220
Number of Classrooms 41 11 52
Permanent Capacity 804
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 591
Utilization (by enrollment) 74% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 731 73
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 91%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 866 -62 Perm Buildings 120,987 19.8%
2010-11 In Migration 047 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 131 Building A 1 1961 110,133 21.1%
Building B 1 2008 10,854 0.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 15.6
Parking Spaces 93

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $31,426 $67,218 $824,676 - $923,320 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $3,935,971*
Roofing - $1,036,854 - - - $1,036,854
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $42,118 - - $42,118
Interior - $106,775 $134,051 $258,925 - $499,751
Mechanical - $2,073,414 $334,031 - - $2,407,445
Electrical - $98,562 $1,006,111 $98,064 - $1,202,736
Plumbing - - $515,120 $18,195 - $533,315
Fire & Life Safety $180,725 $108,863 $22,069 - - $311,657
Technology - $59,544 $656,548 - - $716,092
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $134,682 $213,638 - $348,320
Other $239,808 - $168,085 - $733,661 $1,141,554
Total $420,533 $3,515,438 $3,080,033 $1,413,498 $733,661 $9,163,164
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

053
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Webb MS
Page 137
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

017 Akins High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


10701 South 1st St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78748 2000 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 324,950 31,616 356,566
Area (GSF) per student 119 12 131
Number of Classrooms 114 38 152
Permanent Capacity 2,394
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,720
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 3,092 -698
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 129%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 3,305 -911 Perm Buildings 324,950 6.6%
2010-11 In Migration 176 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 596 Building A 1 2000 194,425 8.3%
Theatre 1 2000 39,881 4.3%
Site Data Gymnasium 1 2000 48,566 2.1%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 57.7 Cafeteria 1 2000 21,733 1.3%
Parking Spaces 659 Greenhouse 1 2004 3,079 3.3%
Classroom 1 2008 17,266 5.5%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $8,006 $1,530 - $655,397 - $664,932 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,162,817*
Roofing - $13,363 $20,715 - - $34,078
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $129,395 - - $129,395
Interior - $42,710 $551,282 $48,002 - $641,994
Mechanical - $556,614 $59,616 - - $616,230
Electrical - $7,162 $175,205 $65,510 - $247,877
Plumbing - - $267,011 $85,304 - $352,315
Fire & Life Safety $671,824 $277,782 $8,983 - - $958,589
Technology - $210,114 $1,966,674 - - $2,176,788
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $243,956 $598,275 - $842,231
Other $274,429 - $543,674 - $134,171 $952,274
Total $954,259 $1,208,558 $3,966,511 $1,452,488 $134,171 $7,715,986
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

017
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Akins HS
Page 138
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

009 Anderson High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


8403 Mesa Drive Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78759 1973 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 309,329 1,536 310,865
Area (GSF) per student 148 1 149
Number of Classrooms 113 1 114
Permanent Capacity 2,373
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,089
Utilization (by enrollment) 88% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,962 411
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 83%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,147 226 Perm Buildings 309,329 27.6%
2010-11 In Migration 391 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 257 Building A 1 1973 171,233 24.2%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1973 121,018 36.1%
Site Data Library 1 2000 17,078 2.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 38.8
Parking Spaces 760

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $134,285 $51,280 - $185,565 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $8,153,203*
Roofing - $96,476 - - - $96,476
Structural - - $62,479 - - $62,479
Exterior $2,067 - $204,242 - - $206,309
Interior - $22,177 $3,519,578 $944,064 - $4,485,819
Mechanical - $5,357,640 $771,481 $204,396 - $6,333,517
Electrical - $717,293 $934,027 $57,350 - $1,708,671
Plumbing $187,292 $41,436 $567,702 $125,657 - $922,088
Fire & Life Safety $470,913 $363,018 $29,211 - - $863,142
Technology - $312,614 $2,218,774 - - $2,531,388
Conveyances - $358,670 - - - $358,670
Specialties - - $391,446 $576,918 - $968,364
Other $223,608 - $501,829 - $8,421,936 $9,147,373
Total $883,879 $7,269,324 $9,335,056 $1,959,665 $8,421,936 $27,869,861
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

009
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Anderson HS
Page 139
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

002 Austin High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


1715 W. Cesar Chavez Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78703 1975 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 307,089 7,680 314,769
Area (GSF) per student 131 3 135
Number of Classrooms 105 8 113
Permanent Capacity 2,205
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,337
Utilization (by enrollment) 106% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,958 247
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 89%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,146 59 Perm Buildings 307,089 31.1%
2010-11 In Migration 789 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 449 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1975 283,518 33.1%
Theatre 1 2000 23,571 3.2%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 44.3
Parking Spaces 544

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $557,354 $811,547 - $1,368,901 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$10,420,955*
Roofing - $1,609,284 - - - $1,609,284
Structural - $35,970 - - - $35,970
Exterior $20,833 $539 $36,126 $112,707 - $170,205
Interior - $21,355 $4,141,426 $2,540,593 - $6,703,375
Mechanical $972,255 $6,008,873 $2,517,319 - - $9,498,447
Electrical - $20,527 $4,561,332 $39,527 - $4,621,386
Plumbing - - $2,691,810 $35,372 - $2,727,183
Fire & Life Safety $444,850 $274,031 $32,183 - - $751,064
Technology - $290,897 $1,862,990 - - $2,153,887
Conveyances - $337,711 - - - $337,711
Specialties - - $209,276 $615,356 - $824,632
Other $383,831 - $458,131 - $8,187,414 $9,029,376
Total $1,821,769 $8,599,187 $17,067,949 $4,155,102 $8,187,414 $39,831,421
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

002
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Austin HS
Page 140
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

013 Bowie High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


4103 Slaughter Ln. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78749 1988 RC No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 417,702 19,968 437,670
Area (GSF) per student 145 7 152
Number of Classrooms 142 25 167
Permanent Capacity 2,982
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 2,876
Utilization (by enrollment) 96% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 2,606 376
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,715 267 Perm Buildings 417,702 31.4%
2010-11 In Migration 505 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 231 Administration 1 1988 14,688 16.4%
Building B 1 1988 261,135 24.8%
Site Data Greenhouse 1 1988 634 16.2%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 66.0 Greenhouse 1 1988 913 11.4%
Parking Spaces 678 Vocational 1 1988 27,588 51.6%
Mechanical 1 1988 5,462 49.0%
Gym/Café/Aud 1 1988 107,282 19.2%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $36,278 $13,022 - - $49,300 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$14,762,227*
Roofing - $4,399 - $483 - $4,882
Structural - - $52,083 $25,949 - $78,032
Exterior - $1,999 $89,863 $101,843 - $193,705
Interior - $35,042 $2,759,482 $3,235,155 - $6,029,679
Mechanical - $12,273,635 $4,660,249 - - $16,933,885
Electrical - $467,936 $613,437 $21,465 - $1,102,839
Plumbing - - $1,589,269 $160,177 - $1,749,446
Fire & Life Safety $607,200 $366,573 $101,563 - - $1,075,335
Technology - $329,391 $2,529,387 - - $2,858,778
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - $4,947 $551,033 $11,602,340 - $12,158,320
Other $535,544 - $1,558,342 - $884,595 $2,978,481
Total $1,142,743 $13,619,484 $14,517,730 $15,147,412 $884,595 $45,311,964
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

013
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Bowie HS
Page 141
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

008 Crockett High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


5601 Manchaca Road Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78745 1969 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 335,087 10,752 345,839
Area (GSF) per student 199 6 205
Number of Classrooms 103 13 116
Permanent Capacity 2,163
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,686
Utilization (by enrollment) 78% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,883 280
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 87%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,026 137 Perm Buildings 335,087 31.2%
2010-11 In Migration 285 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 510 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1969 322,158 30.3%
Theatre 1 1988 12,929 50.5%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 39.5
Parking Spaces 666

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $4,218 $9,966 $999,378 $199,650 - $1,213,212 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$12,432,213*
Roofing - - $240,940 $1,431,074 - $1,672,014
Structural - $5,402 - - - $5,402
Exterior - $3,931 $460,633 - - $464,564
Interior - $105,620 $2,134,141 $90,119 - $2,329,881
Mechanical $193,260 $7,594,793 $5,595,876 - - $13,383,929
Electrical - $139,476 $4,326,369 $112,680 - $4,578,524
Plumbing $86,955 $2,145,931 $3,057,073 $146,206 - $5,436,165
Fire & Life Safety $480,657 $324,155 $61,394 - - $866,207
Technology - $231,149 $1,881,006 - - $2,112,155
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $250,923 $1,031,862 - $1,282,785
Other $1,057,058 - $386,480 - $186,183 $1,629,721
Total $1,822,148 $10,610,065 $19,394,213 $3,011,592 $186,183 $35,024,201
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

008
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Crockett HS
Page 142
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) Grades Served 9-12 (HS)
1012 Arthur Stiles Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Te 78721 0 NR No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 267,140 2,976 270,116
Area (GSF) per student 299 3 302
Number of Classrooms 79 2 81
Permanent Capacity 1,548
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 894
Utilization (by enrollment) 58% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,249 299
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 81%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,354 194 Perm Buildings 267,140 27.0%
2010-11 In Migration 125 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 955 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1960 205,285 32.6%
Theatre 1 1986 10,851 35.4%
Site Data Classroom 1 1986 24,940 7.6%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 27.6 Mechanical 1 1998 248
Parking Spaces 228 Green Tech 1 1998 25,816 1.6%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $608 - $291,746 - - $292,354 Repair priorities 1 & 2 -
$15,634,366*
Roofing - $70,262 $3,372,487 - - $3,442,749
Structural - - - $1,946 - $1,946
Exterior - $3,456,001 $301,327 $4,120 - $3,761,448
Interior $431 $176,082 $316,120 $31,050 - $523,683
Mechanical $54,167 $1,080,074 $37,306 - - $1,171,547
Electrical - $4,487,048 $332,662 $162,664 - $4,982,374
Plumbing $2,724,650 $2,483,754 $119,797 $76,745 - $5,404,947
Fire & Life Safety $343,950 $148,014 $38,970 - - $530,934
Technology - $122,906 $1,313,795 - - $1,436,701
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties $271 - $864,657 $374,364 - $1,239,291
Other $386,864 - $277,245 - $213,544 $877,654
Total $3,510,942 $12,123,425 $7,266,111 $650,888 $213,544 $23,764,910
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

019
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC)
Page 143
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

015 Garza Independence High School Grades Served 11-12 (HS)


1600 Chicon Street Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1939 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 44,754 9,480 54,234
Area (GSF) per student 172 36 209
Number of Classrooms 18 8 26
Permanent Capacity 378
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 260
Utilization (by enrollment) 69% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 378
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 378 Perm Buildings 44,754 21.5%
2010-11 In Migration 251 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1939 32,530 21.1%
Building B 1 1965 11,435 11.5%
Site Data Mechanical 1 1939 493 183.5%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 3.1 Building D 1 1939 48
Parking Spaces 36 Building E 1 1939 248

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $33,221 $33,788 $40,134 - $107,143 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,454,494*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - $942 - - $942
Exterior - - $252,129 - - $252,129
Interior - $229,385 $160,297 $146,780 - $536,462
Mechanical - $312,874 $46,307 - - $359,181
Electrical - $223,161 $674,892 $67,527 - $965,579
Plumbing - - $253,112 $26,530 - $279,642
Fire & Life Safety $144,862 $66,414 $10,469 - - $221,745
Technology - $60,658 $310,505 - - $371,163
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $31,488 $235,513 - $267,002
Other $383,919 - $17,142 - $198,632 $599,694
Total $528,781 $925,712 $1,791,072 $516,483 $198,632 $3,960,682
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

015
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Garza Independence HS
Page 144
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

014 Johnson (LBJ) High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


7309 Lazy Creek Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78724 1974 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 291,406 13,824 305,230
Area (GSF) per student 155 7 162
Number of Classrooms 94 17 111
Permanent Capacity 1,842
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,881
Utilization (by enrollment) 102% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,083 759
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 59%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,155 687 Perm Buildings 291,406 14.4%
2010-11 In Migration 167 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 239 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1974 275,266 14.9%
Theatre 1 2006 16,140 9.9%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 41.4
Parking Spaces 598

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $51,493 $104,860 - - $156,353 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,015,587*
Roofing - $2,932 $57,987 - - $60,919
Structural - - $122,523 - - $122,523
Exterior - - $14,049 $110,561 - $124,610
Interior - $128,130 $266,097 $1,143,379 - $1,537,606
Mechanical - $3,256,695 $1,351,455 - - $4,608,150
Electrical - - $2,383,711 $103,648 - $2,487,359
Plumbing $86,955 - $443,282 $67,050 - $597,288
Fire & Life Safety $396,356 $226,467 $77,941 - - $700,763
Technology - $217,495 $1,656,802 - - $1,874,297
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $307,899 $497,563 - $805,461
Other $599,423 - $453,755 - $96,326 $1,149,504
Total $1,082,734 $3,932,853 $7,240,361 $1,922,200 $96,326 $14,274,474
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

014
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Johnson (LBJ) HS
Page 145
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

004 Lanier High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


1201 Payton Gin Rd Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78758 0 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 262,640 19,978 282,618
Area (GSF) per student 162 12 174
Number of Classrooms 83 26 109
Permanent Capacity 1,627
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,624
Utilization (by enrollment) 100% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,981 -354
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 122%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,242 -615 Perm Buildings 262,640 22.1%
2010-11 In Migration 121 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 557 Building A 1 1966 134,966 28.4%
Theatre 1 1988 16,226
Site Data Gymnasium 1 1966 49,133 19.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 28.5 Vocational 1 1988 17,918 28.8%
Parking Spaces 329 Mechanical 1 1966 4,680 82.8%
Greenhouse 1 1966 922 17.5%
Greenhouse 1 1968 922 17.5%
Greenhouse 1 1968 600 16.8%
Vocational 1 1966 23,968 8.5%
Classroom 1 2009 8,605 6.2%
Storage 1 2008 300
Storage 1 2008 4,000 0.0%
Storage 1 2008 280
Storage 1 2008 120

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $5,002 - $40 $26,921 - $31,963 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $5,855,895*
Roofing - $2,145,237 $1,569,825 - - $3,715,062
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $938,853 - - $938,853
Interior - $25,168 $1,408,999 $146,335 - $1,580,502
Mechanical $716,056 $925,758 $3,711,162 $241,574 - $5,594,550
Electrical - $224,289 $2,383,270 $155,096 - $2,762,655
Plumbing $10,801 $649,540 $649,896 $405,324 - $1,715,561
Fire & Life Safety $421,914 $318,665 $84,442 $53,927 - $878,948
Technology - $138,856 $1,479,163 - - $1,618,020
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - $162 $109,311 $610,386 - $719,858

004
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lanier HS
Page 146
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

Other $175,164 - $324,594 - $176,389 $676,147


Total $1,328,937 $4,526,958 $12,659,556 $1,639,563 $176,389 $20,331,402
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

004
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Lanier HS
Page 147
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

005 McCallum High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


5600 Sunshine Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78756 1953 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 242,667 16,896 259,563
Area (GSF) per student 133 9 142
Number of Classrooms 76 22 98
Permanent Capacity 1,596
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,824
Utilization (by enrollment) 114% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,316 280
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 82%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,434 162 Perm Buildings 242,667 20.4%
2010-11 In Migration 795 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 296 Building A 1 1953 184,032 25.1%
Mechanical 1 1953 2,364 11.1%
Site Data Theatre 1 1987 28,997 10.0%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.1 Gymnasium 1 1987 18,939 15.3%
Parking Spaces 301 Mechanical 1 1953 1,139
Storage 1 1993 3,732 0.0%
Storage 1 1978 464
Building H 1 2010 3,000 5.1%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - - - - $0 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $4,913,137*
Roofing $16,328 $2,323,201 $120,293 - - $2,459,823
Structural $149,521 - $2,577 - - $152,098
Exterior $9,259 $5,115 - - - $14,374
Interior $6,604 $248,022 $444,731 $37,302 - $736,658
Mechanical - $469,522 $6,859,945 $615,536 - $7,945,003
Electrical $26,177 $111,580 $684,807 $76,795 - $899,360
Plumbing - $42,530 $521,263 $104,347 - $668,141
Fire & Life Safety $382,481 $257,141 $52,833 - - $692,455
Technology - $207,162 $1,471,162 - - $1,678,325
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $358,293 $528,359 - $886,652
Other $559,210 - $348,702 - $2,583,395 $3,491,307
Total $1,149,580 $3,763,557 $10,864,608 $1,362,340 $2,583,395 $19,723,479
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

005
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
McCallum HS
Page 148
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

006 Reagan High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


7104 Berkman Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1965 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 249,609 3,072 252,681
Area (GSF) per student 277 3 280
Number of Classrooms 81 1 82
Permanent Capacity 1,588
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 901
Utilization (by enrollment) 57% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,552 36
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 98%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 1,769 -181 Perm Buildings 249,609 22.2%
2010-11 In Migration 080 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 779 Administration 1 1965 5,851 19.2%
Building B 1 1965 60,797 22.2%
Site Data Gymnasium 1 1965 47,562 16.9%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 31.8 Band 1 1965 2,982 10.0%
Parking Spaces 447 Vocational 1 1965 17,949 15.9%
Mechanical 1 1965 4,549 8.7%
Building G 1 1965 24,939 14.4%
Classroom 1 1967 42,718 10.7%
Vocational 1 1987 42,262 25.2%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $842,388 $2,292,227 - $3,134,615 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,073,817*
Roofing - - - - - $0
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - - $16,637 - - $16,637
Interior - $42,710 $1,052,884 $65,128 - $1,160,722
Mechanical $79,120 $113,444 $3,936,964 $15,617 - $4,145,144
Electrical - $290,110 $3,174,736 $202,900 - $3,667,746
Plumbing $86,955 - $760,828 $41,511 - $889,295
Fire & Life Safety $363,053 $207,769 $47,598 - - $618,421
Technology - $161,834 $1,431,591 - - $1,593,425
Conveyances - $49,641 - - - $49,641
Specialties - - $828,516 $503,119 - $1,331,634
Other $679,181 - $849,386 - $348,003 $1,876,570
Total $1,208,310 $865,508 $12,941,528 $3,120,501 $348,003 $18,483,850
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

006
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Reagan HS
Page 149
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

007 Travis High School Grades Served 9-12 (HS)


1211 E. Oltorf Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78704 1953 AA No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 285,098 9,696 294,794
Area (GSF) per student 201 7 208
Number of Classrooms 95 10 105
Permanent Capacity 1,862
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 1,420
Utilization (by enrollment) 76% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 1,902 -40
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) 102%
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 2,087 -225 Perm Buildings 285,098 30.3%
2010-11 In Migration 147 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 677 Gym/Café/Aud 1 1953 224,722 32.4%
Gymnasium 1 1953 47,962 23.1%
Site Data Vocational 1 1975 8,049 29.2%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 34.8 Mechanical 1 1971 492 23.1%
Parking Spaces 451 Mechanical 1 1953 2,273 34.8%
Mechanical 1 1975 1,600 32.9%

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site $8,435 $358,112 $485,606 - - $852,153 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,666,581*
Roofing - $11,618 $772,169 $636,555 - $1,420,342
Structural - $4,163 $23,558 - - $27,720
Exterior - $34,640 $1,142,699 $35,140 - $1,212,479
Interior - $32,033 $1,355,776 $436,067 - $1,823,875
Mechanical $119,848 $575,471 $13,203,202 - - $13,898,521
Electrical - - $3,731,338 $150,106 - $3,881,444
Plumbing $239,148 - $1,384,521 $86,379 - $1,710,048
Fire & Life Safety $412,008 $358,380 $55,450 - - $825,838
Technology - $143,401 $1,700,776 - - $1,844,176
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $149,836 $559,681 - $709,518
Other $270,043 - $315,501 - $870,745 $1,456,288
Total $1,049,482 $1,617,099 $24,320,432 $1,903,928 $870,745 $29,761,687
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

007
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Travis HS
Page 150
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

852 Clifton Center Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)


1519 Coronado Hills Dr. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78752 1977 NR No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 39,039 1,536 40,575
Area (GSF) per student #Error n/a n/a
Number of Classrooms 12 1 13
Permanent Capacity 209
2010-11 Campus Enrollment n/a
Utilization (by enrollment) n/a Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 209
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 209 Perm Buildings 39,039 40.8%
2010-11 In Migration Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration Building A 1 1977 35,199 41.0%
Building B 1 1977 3,840 2.7%
Site Data
Gross Site Area (Acres) 7.8
Parking Spaces 71

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - $79,594 $88,237 $381,866 - $549,698 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $2,045,003*
Roofing - $20,585 - - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior - $8,004 $5,265 - - $13,269
Interior - $21,355 $127,350 $116,858 - $265,563
Mechanical - $1,301,989 $781,277 - - $2,083,266
Electrical - - $868,543 $5,148 - $873,691
Plumbing - - $72,791 $57,050 - $129,841
Fire & Life Safety $54,766 $50,688 $8,983 - - $114,437
Technology - $59,277 $140,628 - - $199,905
Conveyances - $248,207 - - - $248,207
Specialties - - $372,757 $191,515 - $564,272
Other $200,538 - $91,510 - $36,615 $328,663
Total $255,304 $1,789,699 $2,557,341 $752,437 $36,615 $5,391,397
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

852
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Clifton Center
Page 151
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

012 Ridgeview ALC Grades Served 6-12 (Alt. Ed.)


901 Neal Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78702 1953 NR Yes

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 88,677 9,216 97,893
Area (GSF) per student 657 68 725
Number of Classrooms 22 6 28
Permanent Capacity 462
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 135
Utilization (by enrollment) 29% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 462
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 462 Perm Buildings 88,677 34.4%
2010-11 In Migration 139 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1953 84,309 36.6%
Building B 1 1970 1,167 24.2%
Site Data Building C 1 1968 3,201 49.7%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 19.8
Parking Spaces 120

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $57,810 $40,134 - $97,944 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $1,647,347*
Roofing - - $183,006 - - $183,006
Structural - $21,088 $7,827 - - $28,915
Exterior - - $132,297 $1,000,183 - $1,132,480
Interior - - $318,518 $315,973 - $634,491
Mechanical $200,864 $693,247 $4,635,098 - - $5,529,209
Electrical - $156,212 $1,172,948 $3,406 - $1,332,566
Plumbing - - $533,477 $9,634 - $543,111
Fire & Life Safety $163,727 $107,266 $16,480 - - $287,473
Technology - $74,845 $378,576 - - $453,421
Conveyances - - - - - $0
Specialties - - $233,156 $99,651 - $332,807
Other $230,098 - $90,170 - $32,018 $352,286
Total $594,690 $1,052,657 $7,759,365 $1,468,980 $32,018 $10,907,709
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

012
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Ridgeview ALC
Page 152
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
2010 Educational Suitability Assessment School Summary Report

251 Rosedale School Grades Served Alt. Ed. (Alt. Ed.)


2117 W. 49th St. Yr. Open Rating Historic
Austin, Texas 78756 1939 NR No

School Data
Perm Temp Total
Gross Area 37,112 7,680 44,792
Area (GSF) per student 228 47 275
Number of Classrooms 18 5 23
Permanent Capacity 314
2010-11 Campus Enrollment 163
Utilization (by enrollment) 52% Percent of Capacity

Excess/Deficit
Seats
2010-11 Attendance Zone Population 314
Building Data
2010-11 Utilization (by population) n/a
2015-16 Proj'd Attendance Zone Population 314 Perm Buildings 37,112 32.5%
2010-11 In Migration 158 Floors Yr. Built GSF FCI
2010-11 Out Migration 000 Building A 1 1939 35,994 33.4%
Building B 1 1939 460 8.8%
Site Data Building C 1 1940 658 15.8%
Gross Site Area (Acres) 4.9
Parking Spaces 43

Facility Condition - System by Priority Facility Master Plan


Priority Recommendations
System 1 2 3 4 5 Total
Site - - $364,134 $40,134 - $404,267 Repair priorities 1 & 2 - $955,183*
Roofing - - $20,585 - - $20,585
Structural - - - - - $0
Exterior $7,439 $3,845 $539,718 $5,265 - $556,266
Interior - - $242,847 $73,485 - $316,333
Mechanical - $58,248 $1,503,258 - - $1,561,507
Electrical - $191,593 $223,515 $27,644 - $442,752
Plumbing $285,697 - $176,849 $32,233 - $494,778
Fire & Life Safety $79,199 $50,972 - - - $130,171
Technology - $58,809 $230,056 - - $288,865
Conveyances - $99,283 - - - $99,283
Specialties - - $55,191 $72,979 - $128,170
Other $120,098 - $134,431 - $68,255 $322,784
Total $492,433 $462,750 $3,490,585 $251,739 $68,255 $4,765,762
* Includes escalation, design consultant fees, program management fees, and other administrative costs.

251
0ƒ$ƒ3ƒ3ƒ6‹0DJHOODQ&RQVXOWLQJ,QF
Rosedale
Page 153
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

252 Baker Center


3908 Avenue B, Austin Texas 78751

Current Use: Administration and Professional Development Center

Past Use: Elementary School

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 65,868 - 65,868
Site Area (Acres) 4.8
Parking Spaces 60

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 1911 63,810 16.7%
Building B 1 1952 1,600 0.0%
Building C 1 1911 458 110.2%

Page 154
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

951 Burger Athletic Complex


3200 Jones Road, Austin Texas 78745

Current Use: Athletic complex

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 180,614 - 180,614
Site Area (Acres) 48.1
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 2 1977 70 39.7%
Building B Restroom 1 1977 5,832 9.7%
Building C Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%
Building D Restroom 1 1977 5,839 1.4%
Building E Ticket 1 1977 142 23.4%
Building F Restroom 1 1977 5,839 2.4%
Building G Concession 1 1977 4,927 0.9%
Building H Restroom 1 1977 5,832 1.1%
Building I Ticket 1 1977 142 23.4%
Building J Ticket 1 1977 59 0.0%
Building K Press Box 2 1977 12,255 2.2%
Building L Ticket 1 1977 59 77.8%
Building M 1 1977 31,119 0.6%
Building N 1 1977 31,266 6.6%
Building O 3 1977 2,005 0.0%

Page 155
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"

Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011


2010 Facility Master Plan

941 Carruth Admin Center


1111 W. 6th Street, Austin Texas 78703

Current Use: Central Administration

Past Use: Carruth was retail space prior to conversion to AISD administration

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 133,988 - 133,988
Site Area (Acres) 2.8
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 4 1991 61,310 15.6%
Building B 4 1991 21,687 19.3%
Building C 1 3 11,821 21.6%
Building D 3 1991 15,948 22.1%
Building 4 1991 17 216
17,216 14 4%
14.4%
Building P Parking 2 1991 6,007 32.0%

Page 156
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

922 Central Warehouse


3701 Woodbury Drive, Austin Texas 78704

Current Use: AISD Warehouse

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 96,303 - 96,303
Site Area (Acres) 18.7
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 1983 96,303 5.1%

Page 157
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

949 Delco Activity Center


4601 Pecan Brook Drive, Austin Texas 78724

Current Use: Athletic faciltiies and Athletic administration

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 60,294 - 60,294
Site Area (Acres) 44.1
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 3 2003 60,294 3.4%

Page 158
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

948 House Park


1301 Shoal Creek Blvd, Austin Texas 78701

Current Use: Athletic complex

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 32,069 - 32,069
Site Area (Acres) 11.1
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 1940 3,325 0.0%
Building B 1 1986 2,106 0.0%
Building C 1 1940 213 0.0%
Building D 1 1940 294 0.0%
Building E 1 1963 358 0.0%
Building F 1 1940 96 17.9%
Building G 1 2000 64 0.0%
Building H 1 1963 240 94.4%
Building I 1 1940 215 0.0%
Building J 1 1940 248 0.0%
Building K 1 1939 12,473 1.0%
Building L 1 1936 11,331 0.8%
Building M 2 1938 573 11.2%
Building N 2 1938 573 11.2%

Page 159
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

281 Nelson Field


7400 Berkman Drive, Austin Texas 78752

Current Use: Athletic complex

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 59,005 - 59,005
Site Area (Acres) 20.1
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 1963 2,880 43.1%
Building B 1 1963 374 59.6%
Building C 1 1963 796 93.5%
Building D 1 1963 320 48.2%
Building E 1 1963 320 58.7%
Building F 1 1963 374 59.2%
Building G 1 1963 796 7.5%
Building H 1 1963 320 51.8%
Building I 1 1963 320 56.7%
Building J 1 1963 800 19.9%
Building K 1 1963 64 0.0%
Building L 1 1963 80 29.8%
Building M 1 1963 64 0.0%
Building N 4 1963 21,773 0.6%
Building O 1 1963 19,455 0.0%
Building P 1 1963 10,269 2.0%

Page 160
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal


7400 Berkman Drive, Austin Texas 78752

Current Use: Bus Terminal

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 13,093 1,536 14,629
Site Area (Acres) 6.6
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 1995 13,093 4.9%
Portable P097 1 1969 1,536 68.3%

Page 161
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

950 Noack Sports Complex


5300 Crainway Drive, Austin Texas 78724

Current Use: Athletic complex

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 3,231 - 3,231
Site Area (Acres) 11.2
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 2004 1,242 0.4%
Building B 1 2004 1,520 4.1%
Building C 1 2004 101 0.0%
Building D 1 2004 101 0.0%
Building E 1 2004 76 0.0%
Building F 1 2004 96 0.0%
Building G 1 2004 96 0.0%

Page 162
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

960 Saegert Transportation


3300 Jones Road, Austin Texas 78745

Current Use: Bus Terminal

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 26,916 1,536 28,452
Site Area (Acres) 10.6
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 1 2004 1,242 0.0%
Building B 1 2004 1,520 0.0%
Building C 1 2004 101 0.0%
Building D 1 2004 101 0.0%

Page 163
District-wide Facility Master Plan Austin Independent School District
Final Report - 03/28/2011 EXHIBIT "B"
Austin Independent School District Monday, 21 February 2011
2010 Facility Master Plan

962 Service Center


5101 E. 51st Street, Austin Texas 78723

Current Use: Maintenance and Administration

Past Use: N/A

Campus Overview Perm Temp Total


Total Building Area (GSF) 54,307 - 54,307
Site Area (Acres) 16.7
Parking Spaces

Buildings Floors Date GSF FCI


Building A 3 1991 27,435 15.3%
Building B 1 1991 11,219 7.0%
Building C 2 2000 6,602 4.8%
Building D 1 1995 848 0.0%
Building E 1 2007 8,203 0.0%

Page 164
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Educational Framework

The following Educational Framework was used as a i. Campus layout and organization
planning tool to aid in decision making by the Facility j. Neighborhood accessibility
Master Plan Task Force. It was not a mandate, but a set k. Feeder pattern impact
of guidelines, and was intended to be flexible in order to 4) School Performance - The Board may
align resources that will provide optimal learning consider a campus intervention, including
environments for all AISD students. The guiding principle closure or repurposing, for schools that have
for teaching and learning, as set by the Board of Trustees, not met academic criteria established by
is performance-based empowerment and earned the District, state or federal accountability
autonomy. systems.
5) Facility Utilization
1. Planning Guidelines a. Facility condition
A. Priorities for Decision Making and Optimal b. Capacity
Learning Environments c. Enrollment
d. Economic efficiency
1) Safety and Security e. Intensity of use
2) Equitable Learning Opportunities for All
Students - Ensure that all facilities offer
Alternative Learning Education programs
and are in full compliance with the
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
3) Quality Facility Conditions
a. Physical condition and safety
b. Support for academic programs
c. Indoor-air quality – e.g. proper
ventilation, monitoring of indoor pollutants
d. Natural lighting
e. Environmental condition
f. Green Building concepts – e.g. energy,
water and materials efficiency
g. Application of current and emerging
technology – e.g. wireless networks
h. Site acreage

Page 165
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

B. Facility Utilization Alternatives 2. Programmatic Considerations


1) Portable/Temporary Classrooms – The A. School Size
Facility Master Plan seeks to reduce the 1) The following school-size targets are
number of portable/temporary classrooms. guidelines based on community input that,
When additional classrooms are needed fiscally, may be achievable only through
and are anticipated to be needed over creative design concepts, such as multiple
time, the Facility Master Plan will include schools sharing the same campus. It is
plans to replace portable/temporary unlikely that every large school will reduce its
buildings with permanent buildings. enrollment to match these specifications.
2) Shared Use of Facilities – The AISD Facility Therefore, it is necessary to exercise flexibility
Master Plan will, wherever possible, provide with these general guideline, which should
access to school facilities for outside also be applied to site-specific and/or
programs in order to create and promote program-specific facilities. The utilization
successful community-school partnerships. target is 85% - 105%.

C. School Closure, Consolidation and Boundaries – Elementary Schools 300-500 students


The AISD Facility Master Plan Task Force will Middle Schools 600-800 students
consider recommending options for adjusting High Schools 1,500-2,000 students
boundaries and the consolidation or repurposing
of schools to balance enrollment with capacity, 2) The following school size standards have
to ensure an optimal learning environment for all been utilized by AISD for construction of new
students, and to realize necessary economic school facilities since the 1996 Bond Program.
efficiencies. The AISD Facility Master Plan Task
Force will continue to consider criteria and Elementary Schools 720-800 students
options for schools that are not successful in Middle Schools 1,100 students
providing adequate and/or equitable learning High Schools 2,200-2,400 students
environments.
1) Transfer Policy – When possible, reduce the B. Grade Configuration – The current AISD grade
number of transfers to align with the efficient configuration for each facility will remain.
use of facilities. Recommendations may be developed for
schools in which flexibility in configuration might
better meet student and neighborhood needs.

Page 166
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

C. Student Assignment – When developing facility provided by the District [e.g. International
options, student assignment would optimally be Baccalaureate, Global Studies, Early College
based on the following: High School, Early College Start, etc.].

Elementary Schools - Neighborhood Schools / G. Magnet Schools (Open Enrollment Signature


Vertical Alignment Programs) - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task
Middle Schools - Neighborhood Schools/ Vertical Force will seek opportunities to support
Alignment and Choice increasing and enhancing the availability and
(depending upon which option provides the quality of Magnet Schools that offer a
best level of consistency for students). specialized curriculum that draws students
High Schools - Vertical Alignment and Choice across boundaries, requires an application, and
transportation is provided [e.g., LASA, Kealing,
D. Transportation of Choice Students – Fulmore, Ann Richards]. The Facility Master Plan
Transportation should not be provided to Task Force will utilize community input to assist
students attending schools outside of their the District in developing other categories, if
attendance area by choice, with the exception needed, for programs that do not fit existing
of those opting for choice due to No Child Left definitions and criteria.
Behind or for those students whose applications
have been approved for enrollment in a H. Athletic Programs - The AISD Facility Master Plan
Magnet School (Open Enrollment Signature Task Force will seek opportunities to support
Program). increasing and enhancing the availability and
quality of athletic programs and facilities. The
E. Fine Arts - The AISD Facility Master Plan Task plan will also address the facilities that receive
Force will seek opportunities to support more frequent and intensive use.
increasing and enhancing the availability and
quality of Fine Arts programs. I. Career and Technical Programs - The AISD
Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek
F. Vertical Team Signature Programs – The AISD opportunities to support increasing and
Facility Master Plan Task Force will seek enhancing the availability and quality of Career
opportunities to support increasing and and Technical Programs [e.g., Cosmetology,
enhancing the availability and quality of Culinary Arts, etc.].
Signature Programs, which are offered in each
school and/or vertical team. These programs are J. Pre-Kindergarten/Early Childhood Programs –
interest-based, and transportation is not Pre-K and early childhood services should be

Page 167
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

expanded to the greatest extent that is


economically feasible to serve all children of the
community.

K. Student Services – The AISD Facility Master Plan


Task Force will seek opportunities to provide
space for student services based on the
demographic and economic needs of the
student population.

L. Administrative Spaces - Administrative buildings


and spaces will be reviewed and
recommendations developed as part of the
comprehensive Facility Master Plan.

Page 168
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Enrollment Projections

Historical Enrollment Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level


The Austin Independent School District has The Austin Independent School District experienced
experienced a significant increase in enrollment, over growth from 2002-03 to 2010-11 in all grade levels.
7,500 students, during the past nine years. Since 2002- Enrollment in grades Pre-K - 5 increased by a total of
03, student enrollment has increased by an average 7,233 students. Enrollment in grades 6 - 8 increased by a
of approximately 835 students, or 11% each year. The total of 88 students. Enrollment in grades 9-12 increased
current school year, 2010-11, had a notable increase by a total of 199 students. The graph below and the
of an additional 933 students. Specifically, enrollment chart on the following page indicate enrollment by
increased by 610 elementary, 246 middle, and 54 grade over the past nine years.
high school students.

The graph below illustrates the progression of


enrollment changes by year.

AISD Historic Enrollment AISD Historic Enrollment


2002-03 to 2010-2011 by Grade Level
100,000
2002-03 to 2010-11
90,000 60,000
80,000
70,000 50,000
60,000 40,000
50,000
40,000 30,000 PK-5
30,000 20,000
20,000 6-8
10,000 10,000
"9-12"
0 0

Source: AISD Office of Facilities Source: AISD Office of Facilities

Page 169
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Historical Enrollment – By Grade Level


The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the previous nine years.

Austin Independent School District


Historical Enrollment
2002-03 to 2010-2011
Grade 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
EC & PreK 4,421 4,704 5,125 4,943 4,933 5,053 5,044 5,406 5,564
Kindergarten 6,431 6,728 6,849 7,462 7,309 7,391 7,589 7,668 7,660
1 6,405 6,512 6,898 7,055 7,493 7,297 7,498 7,543 7,644
2 6,115 6,235 6,373 6,669 6,898 7,107 7,027 7,354 7,225
3 6,104 6,013 6,174 6,278 6,571 6,617 6,856 6,796 7,102
4 5,866 5,912 5,897 6,073 6,136 6,254 6,477 6,595 6,679
5 5,592 5,754 5,676 5,823 5,870 5,847 6,028 6,195 6,293
Subtotal PK-5 40,934 41,858 42,992 44,303 45,210 45,566 46,519 47,557 48,167
6 5,582 5,390 5,517 5,379 5,511 5,506 5,519 5,568 5,740
7 5,655 5,517 5,278 5,443 5,344 5,300 5,421 5,425 5,513
8 5,252 5,507 5,423 5,258 5,337 5,278 5,229 5,338 5,324
Subtotal 6-8 16,489 16,414 16,218 16,080 16,192 16,084 16,169 16,331 16,577
9 6,764 6,371 6,512 6,332 6,313 6,371 6,366 6,252 6,127
10 5,093 5,321 4,962 5,337 5,183 5,043 5,084 5,148 5,212
11 4,427 4,389 4,694 4,423 4,576 4,588 4,569 4,644 4,724
12 4,179 4,048 4,126 4,368 4,118 4,590 4,511 4,564 4,599
Subtotal 9-12 20,463 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191
Subtotal Sep & Spec 525 358 392 452 471 497 512 500 523
Total 78,411 78,759 79,896 81,295 82,063 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929
Source: AISD Office of Facilities

Page 170
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Historical Enrollment by School

Elementary Schools

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Allan E S 464 494 492 470 441 436 426 446 398 389 392 379
Allison E S 480 485 480 452 467 486 484 509 500 520 520 543
Andrews E S 654 652 601 609 581 586 586 615 611 630 573 717
Baldwin E S 508
Baranoff E S 647 698 777 759 812 782 822 771 788 849 856 876
Barrington E S 660 670 655 703 693 778 746 752 821 866 929 996
Barton Hills E S 402 362 330 319 343 339 354 360 360 374 375 386
Becker E S 307 281 250 257 253 256 265 232 215 214 194 208
Blackshear E S 449 417 378 317 357 309 326 277 272 264 239 244
Blanton E S 824 701 635 668 622 619 608 563 564 547 555 591
Blazier E S - - - - - - - - 445 596 720 775
Boone E S 728 673 627 587 559 561 575 553 538 568 502 501
Brentwood E S 503 468 436 414 405 389 367 413 433 447 476 495
Brooke E S 412 374 360 291 281 337 372 352 344 410 423 439
Brown E S 606 651 534 589 548 550 508 517 508 519 506 519
Bryker Woods E S 394 422 403 369 371 376 397 427 395 401 398 404
Campbell E S 655 646 638 550 498 428 414 400 350 378 396 360
Casey E S 565 641 768 858 959 937 955 914 754 665 663 669
Casis E S 725 667 626 647 681 677 700 743 780 831 818 825
Clayton E S - - - - - - - 599 811 996 974 867
Cook E S 1,022 719 713 791 823 903 953 811 845 892 906 901
Cowan E S - 393 457 458 500 512 529 557 649 707 741 783
Cunningham E S 638 581 613 634 611 581 609 544 538 536 550 512
Davis E S 638 618 588 587 644 631 673 671 619 623 694 683
Dawson E S 464 447 469 415 420 381 362 371 362 335 335 331
Doss E S 666 667 652 659 669 623 627 645 659 677 719 768
Galindo E S 749 759 730 715 771 771 790 740 744 727 717 704
Govalle E S 630 562 459 480 438 440 416 391 383 419 394 415
Graham E S 619 586 573 666 633 713 676 698 678 633 658 761
Gullett E S 455 440 423 432 466 457 460 447 464 481 537 541
Harris E S 970 931 647 587 589 612 684 716 689 694 740 758
Hart E S 652 641 599 613 662 749 923 891 803 835 849 898
Highland Park E S 559 536 529 506 501 493 518 530 557 601 632 662
Hill E S 772 683 703 701 737 737 740 730 665 701 689 732
Houston E S 915 814 839 850 863 872 897 942 923 936 949 917
Jordan E S 725 763 800 696 629 624 622 690 619 743 814 833
Joslin E S 401 383 394 413 400 377 346 355 350 332 326 363
Kiker E S 1,058 771 720 753 836 881 993 711 697 717 904 933

Page 171
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Elementary Schools cont.


Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Kocurek E S 741 650 623 579 588 606 682 682 654 678 644 660
Langford E S 819 855 824 850 828 901 999 835 859 844 841 834
Lee E S 371 367 395 359 375 374 383 411 401 406 440 428
Linder E S 621 663 724 853 862 1,000 819 874 931 879 842 892
Maplewood E S 370 316 331 313 324 342 348 332 346 373 428 406
Mathews E S 372 326 345 391 386 409 393 432 418 417 392 405
McBee E S - 558 601 638 707 777 822 650 704 758 785 765
Menchaca E S 426 543 598 638 664 715 809 898 678 626 698 686
Metz E S 662 632 658 602 518 542 661 668 592 553 492 498
Mills E S 697 761 815 819 860 912 953 893 974 1,061 1,100 928
Norman E S 512 547 504 553 571 598 578 586 397 372 326 333
Oak Hill E S 812 781 762 763 814 837 837 896 926 950 1,008 772
Oak Springs E S 409 412 383 363 342 289 283 284 317 313 311 274
Odom E S 751 741 782 768 746 763 776 785 761 711 688 658
Ortega E S 365 357 360 300 290 277 283 280 253 254 286 296
Overton E S - - - - - - - - 543 647 715 668
Palm E S 628 652 622 693 830 886 991 725 644 662 650 606
Patton E S 832 823 833 812 829 804 785 777 745 726 763 914
Pease E S 238 248 257 236 238 251 252 247 254 254 252 256
Pecan Springs E S 560 592 585 602 569 584 556 545 554 497 516 532
Perez E S - - - - - - - 655 742 705 805 886
Pickle E S - - 613 594 593 581 638 660 685 710 729 740
PillowE S 481 440 412 405 460 473 524 529 552 563 652 653
Pleasant Hill E S 561 525 504 515 532 585 624 655 587 623 632 619
Read E C E S - - - - - - - 364 559 549 477 509
Reilly E S 309 283 273 245 279 231 254 285 268 258 303 296
Ridgetop E S 259 257 239 208 248 230 238 199 211 201 191 219
Rodriguez E S 691 723 684 750 725 780 872 901 946 973 955 910
St E lmo E S 431 422 439 490 494 484 437 449 421 360 353 585
Sanchez E S 503 485 420 390 448 450 659 658 551 610 611 277
Sims E S 299 303 332 322 365 388 408 416 417 415 319 304
Summitt E S 631 622 596 639 585 629 601 576 559 701 750 854
Sunset Valley E S 584 592 564 516 506 505 481 437 435 448 463 451
Travis Heights E S 568 501 502 527 457 518 562 573 587 564 525 537
Walnut Creek E S 969 994 877 942 983 1,052 1,078 971 955 763 900 916
Widen E S 733 804 756 791 765 820 782 796 846 825 794 769
Williams E S 709 651 637 606 645 624 616 620 627 694 664 642
Winn E S 586 604 629 665 635 621 671 672 514 432 441 463
Wooldridge E S 1,062 748 754 718 773 821 806 946 833 841 888 878
Wooten E S 632 640 613 593 588 578 603 638 633 682 688 695
Zavala E S 419 468 433 432 434 443 462 492 459 439 393 407
Zilker E S 421 433 440 496 511 541 480 451 478 495 524 522
E lementary Total 42,442 41,915 41,617 41,791 42,430 43,424 44,729 45,626 45,947 46,885 47,897 48740
Page 172
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Middle Schools
Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Bailey MS 1,529 1,217 1,173 1,144 1,099 1,074 1,134 1,175 1,147 1,206 959 1,041
Bedichek MS 1,136 1,004 998 889 904 908 912 1,039 1,150 1,119 1,018 1,054
Burnet MS 1,126 1,065 1,063 1,008 1,084 1,045 970 1,005 988 912 969 998
Covington MS 752 855 939 945 911 889 862 910 1,014 954 950 805
Dobie MS 874 913 921 763 746 739 808 849 517 566 603 630
Fulmore MS 764 749 872 957 992 1,054 1,037 1,029 1,045 1,036 1,007 995
Garcia MS - - - - - - - - 605 649 689 658
Gorzycki MS - - - - - - - - - - 835 963
Kealing MS 958 1,058 978 948 1,029 1,277 1,190 1,251 1,215 1,279 1,242 1,233
Lamar MS 915 855 798 779 791 701 675 671 741 780 668 604
Martin MS 495 622 632 648 736 738 676 702 760 744 691 639
Mendez MS 1,313 874 857 828 840 776 840 1,108 1,029 903 871 890
Murchison MS 1,236 1,232 1,240 1,213 1,210 1,227 1,257 1,216 1,156 1,156 1,254 1,281
O. Henry MS 681 743 866 887 885 801 747 789 881 982 1,005 1,026
Paredes MS - 959 1,060 1,208 1,227 1,292 1,330 1,067 989 957 899 930
Pearce MS 958 849 859 852 847 801 810 809 580 516 452 329
Richards ( 6-8) MS - - - - - - - - 224 334 362 378
Small MS 929 1,054 1,080 1,108 1,129 1,088 1,114 1,140 1,167 1,188 944 959
Webb MS 805 777 779 789 767 748 663 658 495 522 573 591

Middle School Total 14,471 14,826 15,115 14,966 15,197 15,158 15,025 15,418 15,703 15,803 15,991 16,004

Page 173
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

High Schools

Austin Independent School District Historic Enrollment 1999/ 2000 - 2010/ 2011
SCHOOL NAME 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11
Akins HS - 1,076 1,544 2,053 2,219 2,257 2,389 2,359 2,507 2,663 2,710 2,720
Anderson HS 1,804 1,742 1,763 1,959 1,959 1,997 2,121 2,013 2,093 2,096 2,000 2,089
Austin HS 2,167 2,014 2,136 2,149 2,158 2,245 2,207 2,124 2,240 2,343 2,390 2,337
Bowie HS 3,045 2,608 2,435 2,370 2,485 2,613 2,699 2,821 2,778 2,768 2,828 2,876
Crockett HS 2,529 2,414 2,174 2,099 1,999 1,962 2,038 1,992 1,907 1,857 1,763 1,686
E astside HS 1,826 1,479 1,359 1,008 975 1,068 775 760 691 556 679 718
Garza HS 318 339 384 347 307 266 280 308 315 301 258 260
International HS - - - - - - 258 264 185 202 230 176
LASA HS - - - - - - - - 858 860 874 881
LBJ HS 1,619 1,654 1,812 1,811 1,717 1,671 1,676 1,703 1,001 1,046 1,018 1,000
Lanier HS 1,855 1,762 1,666 1,915 1,794 1,793 1,674 1,619 1,693 1,608 1,594 1,624
McCallum HS 1,666 1,652 1,676 1,705 1,709 1,686 1,724 1,706 1,717 1,733 1,793 1,824
Reagan HS 1,405 1,394 1,276 1,304 1,169 1,064 1,029 989 973 988 958 901
Richards 9th and 10th - - - - - - - - - - 79 150
Travis HS 1,709 1,691 1,665 1,718 1,638 1,672 1,590 1,532 1,634 1,509 1,434 1,420

High School Total 19,943 19,825 19,890 20,438 20,129 20,294 20,460 20,190 20,592 20,530 20,608 20,662
Separate Campuses 102 44 311 318 239 271 339 350 329 337 311 332
Special Campuses 159 145 155 207 119 121 113 121 168 175 189 191

District Total 77,117 76,755 77,088 77,720 78,114 79,268 80,666 81,705 82,739 83,730 84,996 85,929

Page 174
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Birth Data

Historical birth data for the 31 zip codes comprising the


District was collected. The total number of live births for Austin Indep endent School Distr ict
this area has steadily increased from 1994 to 2008. In Live Births
1994, there were 9,175 births compared to 12,733 in 2008.
1994-2009
A slight decline of 45 births followed in 2009. The increase
in births points to continued growth at the elementary Year Births
school level. Live birth data is commonly used to predict 1994 9,175
future kindergarten enrollment. 1995 9,417
1996 9,650
1997 9,822
1998 10,329
Live Births by Year
in Zip Codes within AISD Boundaries 1999 10,829
14,000
2000 11,426
12,000 2001 11,346
10,000 2002 11,160
2003 11,270
8,000
2004 11,492
6,000 2005 11,383
4,000
2006 12,539
2007 12,744
2,000
2008 12,733
0 2009 12,688
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the
Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis &
E nrollment Projections, 2010
Source: Texas Department of State Health Services & the
Dennis D. Harner and Associates Demographic Analysis &
E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 175
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Projected Enrollment Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level


In 2010, AISD commissioned Dennis D. Harner and Associates Projected enrollment for the 2011-12 through 2020-21 school
to develop enrollment projections. According to this report, years shows a steady increase in enrollment in all grade
the total projected enrollment for AISD is expected to levels. At the elementary level, which reflects Pre-K through
increase by 12,356 students, or 14.4%, from the 2010-11 Grade 5, the projected enrollment shows an increase of
school year to the 2020-21 school year. 5,225 students from the 2010-11 school year to the 2020-21
school year.
The enrollment forecasts were calculated using a “cohort
survival” method. Each grade (cohort) is advanced from Similarly, the middle school enrollment, which reflects
one year to the next based upon historical trends. Live birth Grades 6 through 8, shows an increase of 3,334 students. The
data is also collected and used to compare the relationship high school level, reflecting Grades 9 through 12, shows an
between kindergarten and enrollment five years later. A increase of 4,166 students during this same timeframe. The
cohort (grade) is advanced from one grade to the next table below shows projected enrollment by year and grade
based upon historical trends. The number of live births, and level.
subsequently, the number of children, enrolled in
kindergarten, has steadily increased since 2002.

AISD Projected Enrollment


Mid-Range Total Projected by Grade Level
Enrollment 2011-12 to 2020-21
2011-12 to 2020-2021 60,000
120,000 50,000
100,000 40,000
80,000
30,000 PK-5
60,000
20,000 6-8
40,000
20,000 10,000 9-12
0 0

Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 176
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Projected Enrollment – By Grade Level


The following chart depicts the progression of increasing enrollment throughout the next ten years.

Austin Independent School District


Mid-Range Projected E nrollment
2010-11 to 2019-20
Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
E C & PreK 5,368 5,419 5,471 5,524 5,575 5,628 5,679 5,731 5,782 5,834
Kindergarten 7,773 7,848 7,923 7,998 8,073 8,148 8,223 8,298 8,373 8,448
1 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132 8,207 8,282 8,357 8,432
2 7,426 7,532 7,607 7,682 7,757 7,832 7,907 7,982 8,057 8,132
3 6,988 7,176 7,282 7,357 7,432 7,507 7,582 7,657 7,732 7,807
4 6,926 6,788 6,976 7,082 7,157 7,232 7,307 7,382 7,457 7,532
5 6,423 6,676 6,538 6,726 6,832 6,907 6,982 7,057 7,132 7,207
Subtotal PK-5 48,661 49,271 49,704 50,351 50,883 51,386 51,887 52,389 52,890 53,392
6 5,952 6,073 6,326 6,188 6,376 6,482 6,557 6,632 6,707 6,782
7 5,677 5,877 5,998 6,251 6,113 6,301 6,407 6,482 6,557 6,632
8 5,471 5,617 5,817 5,938 6,191 6,053 6,241 6,347 6,422 6,497
Subtotal 6-8 17,100 17,567 18,141 18,377 18,680 18,836 19,205 19,461 19,686 19,911
9 6,497 6,621 6,767 6,967 7,088 7,341 7,203 7,391 7,497 7,572
10 4,882 5,197 5,321 5,467 5,667 5,788 6,041 5,903 6,091 6,197
11 4,623 4,382 4,697 4,821 4,967 5,167 5,288 5,541 5,403 5,591
12 4,761 4,648 4,407 4,722 4,846 4,992 5,192 5,313 5,566 5,428
Subtotal 9-12 20,763 20,848 21,192 21,977 22,568 23,288 23,724 24,148 24,557 24,788
Total 86,524 87,686 89,037 90,705 92,131 93,510 94,816 95,998 97,133 98,091
Source: Dennis D. Harner & Associates Demographic Analysis and E nrollment Projections, 2010

Page 177
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Capacity Analysis

How many students can a building accommodate? This In AISD, functional capacity is reviewed on an annual
question often arises, and in the development of a basis. Functional capacity is a more realistic analysis of
facility master plan, can be one of the most debated what a building can accommodate and takes into
issues. It is not uncommon to review an evaluation of an account all special programs available at the school
existing building only to find that the capacity which was that year, in addition to any portable buildings located
once assigned to the building is considerably more than on site, to determine how many students can be
what the building can reasonably accommodate today. assigned to a particular school campus each school
year.
The main reason for this is that the programs in a public
school system and the manner in which they are For master planning purposes, an updated methodology
delivered have changed significantly since the building to the former AISD permanent capacity methodology
was originally built. More than half the square footage in was developed and applied. The formula for long-range
AISD was built before 1985. Twenty-five years ago, planning should reflect District programs, but should be
computer labs were just beginning to be incorporated kept simple and equitable since programs change from
into schools, and severely handicapped students, year to year while classroom square footages remain, for
previously assigned to specialized facilities, were not yet the most part, the same. Permanent capacity does not
mainstreamed into public schools. In addition, state incorporate temporary or portable classrooms, but only
legislation has mandated smaller student/teacher ratios. permanent space.

In facility planning, the term design capacity is used to Elementary School Permanent Capacity
describe simply counting the number of classrooms in a The elementary program is usually delivered based on
building and multiplying by an average class size. Even students being assigned to a home room and attending
though at first glance this seems only to be common special programs such as art, music, and physical
sense, this methodology does not take into account the education in a specialized classroom. The number of
programmatic implications of school facilities. special classrooms required is reflective of the total
number of students enrolled and is subtracted from the
total number of classrooms since the vacated home
room cannot be utilized by other students.
Age of AISD Permanent Buildings

Year Constructed Pre 1925 1925 - 1944 1945 - 1964 1965 - 1984 1985 - 1994 1995 - 2004 2005 - 2010
Total Square Feet 209,259 547,147 3,083,806 3,481,972 2,363,533 1,616,514 1,026,591
Building Count 5 33 90 77 65 59 33

Page 178
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

A 95% efficiency factor is applied since students do not movement to block scheduling, an efficiency factor of
always arrive in perfect sets of 22 students. Additionally, 75% is applied.
due to reduced class size and increased support space
needs for Title 1 schools, an 85% efficiency factor is The following describes the permanent capacity
applied to compute permanent capacity at these methodology for secondary schools.
facilities.  Count permanent classrooms.
 Multiply by 28 (average class size).
The following describes the permanent capacity  Apply 75% efficiency factor; 70% efficiency factor
methodology for elementary schools. for Title 1 schools.
 Count permanent classrooms.
 Subtract special areas for music, art, etc. (3-7 Core Capacity
classrooms based on staffing ratios). Core capacity is defined as those spaces that large
 Multiply by 22 (average class size). groups of students utilize at some point during the school
 Apply 95% efficiency factor; 85% efficiency factor day, including the cafeteria, gymnasium, and library. As
for Title 1 schools. part of the new methodology, consideration was given
to lower permanent capacity if the cafeteria or
Secondary School Permanent Capacity gymnasium was less than 85% of permanent capacity,
Unlike elementary schools, at the secondary level based on the number of classrooms.
students are not in self-contained environments but are
traveling from one location to another each period. All The chart below shows the AISD standard for core space
classrooms are counted including the specialized sizes based on the current approved educational
spaces. Since it is difficult to schedule every teaching standards.
space every period of the day, in addition to the

Core Space Standards Cafeteria Gym Library


School Size Total Total Total
Grade Level (# of students) Square Feet SF/Student Square Feet SF/Student Square Feet SF/Student
Elementary 880 4,200 4.77 3,000 3.41 3,500 3.98
Middle 1,100 4,500 4.10 13,400 12.18 4,800 4.36
High 2,400 9,000 3.75 20,720 8.63 8,400 3.50
Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

Page 179
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Utilization

Utilization, or efficiency, of a school facility, is calculated


by dividing the enrollment of the school by its permanent
capacity. The target range as determined by the Facility
Master Plan Task Force for the purposes of long-range
planning is 85%-105%. Schools below 85% may be able to
provide relief for overcrowded schools or may be
considered as potential candidates for closure or
consolidation. Schools above 105% should be monitored
for additional growth, and schools that exceed 125% are
considered for additions or for relief through the
construction of new schools.

The chart below indicates that district-wide, AISD is within


the 85%-105% target range; however, by grade level, the
elementary schools are above the target and the middle
schools are below. In other words, the District is short
3,833 seats at the elementary level, but has 4,263 too
many at the middle school level.

2010 Permanent Utilization


Grade Level Enrollment Capacity Rate
Elementary 48,738 44,905 109%
Middle 16,154 20,417 79%
High 20,512 21,698 95%
Districtwide 85,404 87,020 98%
Source: AISD, Office of Facilities

On an individual basis, there are 29 schools, or 25% of all


school campuses, that fall below 85% of permanent
capacity. Fifty-three schools, or 46% of all school
campuses, operate at above 105%. The map to the right
and the ones on the following pages illustrate the 2010-11
school year enrollment utilization.

Page 180
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Page 181
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Enrollment versus Population

The population (number of students that live within an


attendance zone) is not always equal to the enrollment
(number of students that attend) of a school. No Child
Left Behind, transfer policies, and open enrollment
signature programs are some of the reasons students
migrate in and out of their assigned attendance zones.

In a few cases in AISD, students migrating into a school


comprise more than 40% of its enrollment. When large
numbers of students travel outside of the boundary of
their assigned school, to attend a different school, it
presents a challenge when planning for long-term facility
needs.

Because the number of students migrating in and out of


an attendance zone may vary year to year, it is
important to also look at the attendance zone
population. Population projections, which are derived
from birth data, census data, and housing stock analysis
are used in long-range planning efforts to identify trends
in growth and decline. Population projections are more
reliable than anticipating the rates of in and out
migration.

The following maps provide the 2010-11 population as a


percent of permanent capacity by school. This provides
a different picture than the enrollment utilization maps on
the preceding pages. For example, a school that falls
below the target utilization of 85% based on enrollment
may in fact be above 85% based on population.

Page 182
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Page 183
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Facility Condition Analysis Of course, FCI is not the only factor used to identify
buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
Facility condition is the state of repair of the building closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends,
infrastructure. Facility condition takes into consideration community sentiment, and the availability of capital are
all of the building systems from roofs and windows to additional factors that are analyzed when making school
electrical and mechanical systems. Although there is a facility decisions.
cost associated with renovating every building
Cost of Repairs
according to current codes and standards, this does not = Facility Condition Index (FCI)
mean that all schools need massive and immediate Cost of Replacement
repairs and renovations. Rather, this provides an
understanding of the effort it would take to bring all The chart below indicates the distribution of campuses
facilities up to the same standard. by ranges of FCI in AISD. Please note that the support
facilities are included. Only one facility, Pease ES, falls
The facility condition information does provide the into the replace category; however, two schools, Zilker ES
following. and Wooten ES are between 50-59% and should be
 Comparative analysis of building conditions considered for major renovation or replacement.
 Approximate cost to address the facility conditions
FCI Campuses
of all buildings in the District
 Understanding of which buildings are in the worse <10% Repair 18
conditions and that might be slated for more
immediate focus 10-19% Renovate 35
20-29% 30
Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an
index called the Facility Condition Index (FCI) to 30-39% 31
benchmark the relative condition of a group of schools. 40-49% 9
This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a
facility by the total cost to replace the facility. For
50-59% 2
example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might 60-69% Replace -
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now
70-79% 1
has $1 million in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by
$10 million results in an FCI of 10 percent. Industry 80-89% -
standards and financial modeling dictate that FCI 90-100% -
numbers above 65% or greater are more cost-effective
to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency gains >100% -
with more modern facilities and the value of the building
at the end of the analysis period. Total 126

Page 184
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

FCI: The Denominator engineering assessors to identify deficient conditions in


The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and the buildings.
possibly the easiest with which to start. The denominator
is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is Replacement Costs Cost/Sq.ft. Replacement Cost

important to recognize that this cost is based on the PreK Centers $ 297.47 $ 4,783,318
replacement of a building with another facility that is the Elementary School $ 297.47 $ 24,541,275
same size and is fully code compliant. If, for example, Middle School $ 327.40 $ 55,658,000
you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot High School $ 323.11 $ 106,626,300
gymnasium building at a campus, the replacement cost
Alt. Ed. School $ 327.40 $ 6,548,000
is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square
Admin $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
foot building. Since the replacement cost comparison is
Support $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200
primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of Maintenance - Transportation $ 280.61 $ 5,612,200

cost models have been developed that estimate the Portable Building $ 138.93 $ 213,396

cost per square foot for new construction and are


indicated in the chart to the right. The cost models take This survey focused, for the most part, on the condition of
into account national industry averages from a the existing buildings and did not initially include
recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, educational adequacy or functional equity needs. All of
adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as the District’s recent the identified needs were grouped into building systems,
experience in the Austin construction market. The costs and a Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans®
per square foot are then multiplied by the size of the nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin, Texas
school or building under consideration. This area, was employed to develop consistent cost
methodology is used for both permanent and portable estimates across all schools. These cost estimates, using
buildings. the industry-standard, line- item costs, comprise the
majority of the costs in the AISD facility assessment
FCI: The Numerator database and are included in the numerator of the FCI
The numerator is the estimated cost to complete the calculation.
repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair
cost is generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. In addition, ADA (American with Disabilities Act)/TAS
Within reason, the deficient conditions would be repaired (Texas Accessibility Standards) reports were developed
or systems replaced to put the building into fully to address ADA issues against current guidelines during
serviceable condition to meet current codes. 2008-09. A functional equity study identified core areas
and specialized classroom areas, within specific school
At AISD, the District retained a firm in 2007 to assess all of campuses that did not meet AISD educational
the facilities in the district and develop cost estimates to specifications. The cost to resolve these issues has been
make needed repairs. That effort included an included in the deficiencies and numerator of the
assessment of all facilities using architectural and current FCI numbers.
Page 185
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Educational Adequacy Assessment


As part of this master planning effort, AISD conducted an • Relationship of Spaces: Proximity of instructional
educational adequacy assessment of all schools. An spaces to support areas such as libraries, labs, and
educational adequacy assessment evaluates how well lecture halls.
the campus is equipped to deliver the instructional
program. The chart below identifies the educational adequacy
deficiency costs by the eight overall criteria.
During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to Technology, instructional aids, and security and
each school and collected an inventory of each space supervision make up the greatest need in terms of
at the classroom level. This data was then compared to educational adequacy.
the District developed standards to identify when an
individual space did not meet a specific level of
compliance. When an item did not meet the standard,
the condition was noted and a line item was added to Educational Adequacy Total
the assessment database with a budget to correct that
Capacity $ 1,476,141
condition.
Support for Programs $ 8,738,417
This applied a standards-based approach to determine Technology $ 74,371,610
the overall educational adequacy by evaluating eight
overall criteria as follows. Security and Supervision $ 34,273,456
 Capacity: Ability of the facility to meet the needs of Instructional Aids $ 53,308,580
the student population.
Learning Environment $ 3,862,200
 Support for Programs: Provision of special spaces or
classrooms to support the instructional program. Physical Characteristics $ 4,715,934
 Technology: Presence of infrastructure, data Relationship of Spaces $ 4,078,391
distribution, and equipment.
 Supervision & Security: Extent to which physical
configurations help or hinder building operation. Subtotal $ 184,824,729
 Instructional Aids: Presence of necessary equipment
within teaching spaces.
 Physical Characteristics: Sizes and shapes of
teaching spaces.
 Learning Environment: Degree to which learning
areas are comfortable, well-lit, odor-free,
controllable and quiet.

Page 186
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Building Deficiencies
The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over 41,000 line
items district-wide. Deficiencies are categorized by the following priorities.

Priority 1: currently critical (immediate need, i.e., fire safety systems)


Priority 2: potentially critical (to be corrected within one year, i.e., major HVAC equipment, security systems)
Priority 3: necessary/not yet critical (1-2 years, i.e., site lighting, sanitation sewer, educational adequacy)
Priority 4: recommended (3-5 years, i.e., finishes, educational adequacy)
Priority 5: does not meet current code/standards/grandfathered (i.e., functional equity, 3rd tier ADA/TAS)

The chart below lists the facility type and the costs associated with correcting priorities 1 through 5. Logically, the greatest
need is at the elementary schools since this makes up the largest number of schools and the most square footage in the
District.

Renovation Costs by Priority, by Campus

Type Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Total


Schools
PreK Centers $ 191,332 $ 843,430 $ 1,221,125 $ 154,414 $ 9,470 $ 2,419,771
Elementary Schools $ 36,765,169 $ 101,426,669 $ 259,226,302 $ 30,846,706 $ 78,109,545 $ 506,374,392
Middle Schools $ 19,163,034 $ 56,423,338 $ 88,591,082 $ 17,785,740 $ 42,995,421 $ 224,958,615
High Schools $ 16,483,563 $ 69,061,730 $ 141,365,127 $ 36,842,162 $ 22,301,333 $ 286,053,916
Alternative Education $ 1,342,426 $ 3,305,106 $ 13,807,291 $ 2,473,156 $ 136,888 $ 21,064,868

Total Schools $ 73,945,525 $ 231,060,273 $ 504,210,927 $ 88,102,178 $ 143,552,658 $ 1,040,871,561

Other District Facilities


Support Facilities $ 2,135,310 $ 7,374,941 $ 6,094,116 $ 45,901 $ 291,467 $ 15,941,735
Administrative $ 732,481 $ 2,760,465 $ 9,054,486 $ 363,873 $ 202,910 $ 13,114,216
Maintenance and Transp. $ 637,830 $ 880,329 $ 3,343,222 $ 277,590 $ 199,746 $ 5,338,716

Total Other District Facil $ 3,505,621 $ 11,015,735 $ 18,491,824 $ 687,363 $ 694,123 $ 34,394,666

Grand Total $ 77,451,146 $ 242,076,008 $ 522,702,751 $ 88,789,541 $ 144,246,781 $ 1,075,266,227

Page 187
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

The chart below provides a crosstab by building system. The greatest building system deficiency, as is typically the case,
is in the area of Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC). Please note that the “Other” building system category
includes functional equity and ADA/TAS compliance.

Districtwide Crosstab by Priority by System

Facility Condition Assessment Priority


Building System 1 2 3 4 5 Total

Site $ 498,041 $ 3,002,131 $ 20,459,959 $ 15,715,200 $ - $ 39,675,332


Roofing $ 1,016,327 $ 20,921,438 $ 22,268,609 $ 4,912,452 $ - $ 49,118,826
Exterior $ 195,604 $ 5,079,548 $ 20,391,721 $ 3,620,156 $ - $ 29,287,028
Structure $ 191,655 $ 392,439 $ 997,978 $ 63,077 $ - $ 1,645,149
Interior $ 126,632 $ 6,550,035 $ 44,089,416 $ 20,438,059 $ - $ 71,204,142
HVAC $ 12,732,977 $ 147,968,144 $ 149,987,307 $ 1,725,368 $ - $ 312,413,796
Plumbing $ 16,072,172 $ 7,908,635 $ 66,458,213 $ 3,840,468 $ 1,568 $ 94,281,056
Electrical $ 575,073 $ 23,329,696 $ 68,672,377 $ 5,273,377 $ - $ 97,850,523
Technology $ - $ 9,936,855 $ 77,335,604 $ - $ - $ 87,272,458
Fire and Safety $ 19,377,531 $ 11,607,150 $ 1,133,648 $ 567,724 $ - $ 32,686,053
Conveyances $ 223,695 $ 5,132,182 $ 8,858 $ - $ - $ 5,364,736
Specialties $ 37,115 $ 247,755 $ 19,236,791 $ 32,633,662 $ - $ 52,155,323
Other $ 26,404,324 $ - $ 31,662,269 $ - $ 144,245,213 $ 202,311,806

Total $ 77,451,146 $ 242,076,008 $ 522,702,751 $ 88,789,541 $ 144,246,781 $ 1,075,266,227

A summary of building system by priority by individual school campus is available in the Facility Summary Reports with
Facility Master Plan Recommendations section of this report, pages 38-164.

Page 188
EXHIBIT "B"
District-wide Facility Master Plan
Final Report – 03/28/2011

Facility Options

Using the Educational Framework as guiding principles,  Future growth – account for future population
the Facility Master Plan Task Force began the growth/decreases
complicated task of developing facility options and  Facility condition – facility condition index rating
scenarios in order to meet their charge of developing
recommendations to improve facility efficiencies through
objective data analysis and community input. Over the course of seven months, 108 options that were
developed by the Task Force, consultants, and staff,
The information and data considered included the were reviewed and evaluated by the Task Force.
following.
An outline of the 108 options is provided in Appendix G of
 Current condition of buildings (FCI) this report.
 Educational adequacy of schools
 Current and proposed instructional programs
 Current and projected population growth and
decline
 Lease obligations, current and possible use of
buildings, and administrative facilities

The following criteria were used for decision making.

 Educational enhancement – meet the


educational needs of all students
 Efficient space utilization – optimum utilization
range was between 85%-105% of permanent
capacity
 Cost savings – decrease M&O expenses or capital
cost avoidance of correcting building
deficiencies and building operating costs per
student
 Community Impact – impact of change versus the
gains

Page 189
EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT


District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix A
FCI White Paper and Facility FCI Charts

Page 190
EXHIBIT "B"

White Paper:
Facility Condition Index (FCI) at Austin ISD
The assessment of school facilities and the development of long-range master plans, is Magellan
Consulting’s core business. District-wide master plans, by their very nature, recommend changes across
a district. In nearly every district in which we work, there are building condition and student capacity
challenges. Often, there exists enough capacity across the district when compared to total student
enrollment; however, that capacity is rarely in the right place. In the last five years, every large urban
district we have worked with has faced considerable loss of enrollment district-wide which eventually
necessitates reducing overall footprint and closing schools. We typically see changes in educational
programs that make the alignment of facilities a challenge, as curriculum and delivery methods are ever-
evolving. Nearly 90 percent of our country’s 21st century schools were designed and constructed in the
20th century, most in the mid 20th century, under an industrial age factory model with a long row of
classrooms down a double-loaded corridor. The condition of schools, with the exception of very
wealthy districts, is declining across the country. The recent economic climate is exacerbates this
problem as maintenance funds are decreasing. Texas the new education funding system in Texas is
placing greater emphasis on the use of Maintenance and Operations (M&O) funds. Unfortunately,
deferred maintenance does not go away with reduced funding, and the unmet need continues to build
until the cost to repair eventually exceeds the cost to replace the facility.

Commonly, communities have a widespread perception that school districts shape, hide, or manipulate
building condition data to obtain a desired result. This perception may even result in a law suit, which
creates the necessity to engage in projects that are driven by legal requirements. While years ago there
may have been school districts that were guilty of these charges, particularly in the era of racial
segregation and the court-ordered desegregation that followed, the fact is that we have not seen data
manipulation at any of the districts in which we have worked for over a decade.

School district administrators and facility staffs continually request that we simplify the data and planning
parameters. The process of engaging the community offers a broad spectrum of individuals who want to
participate. These diverse groups of individuals may speak different languages, have different educational
backgrounds, different levels of school planning experience. Some may have a deep understanding of
mathematics and can easily read charts and graphs, while others will not. The main challenge herein, is
that the amount and type of data used in the planning process is very complex. Depending upon the
issue, capacity can include a variety of factors. Capacity may include only permanent space, or it may
include both permanent and temporary space. Capacity can be adjusted for smaller class sizes, and
utilization can affect capacity when smaller class sizes are required for special needs students. In
addition, the Facility Condition Index FCI may include only current costs, or it may include a forecast of
future system replacements that are going to occur within the next three to five years. Enrollment data
is often complicated by official enrollment, staffing enrollment, average daily membership, and even the
time of year. Although there is often a desire to simplify the information presented, it is not
always possible to do so while maintaining access to the kinds of data that are presented in
the complex planning process. The variables in data mean to the outside individual that numbers
may be different from one context to another. Capacities change from year to year, buildings
deteriorate on a daily basis, and enrollment fluctuates. School planners are always working with a
moving target.

Page 191
EXHIBIT "B"

Since 1991, the facility management industry has used an index called the FCI to benchmark the relative
condition of a group of schools. This index simply divides the identified repair costs in a facility by the
total cost to replace the facility. For example, take a 100,000 square foot building that might
theoretically cost $10 million to construct new and now has $1 million
in identified repairs. Dividing $1 million by $10 million results in an FCI Campuses
FCI of 10 percent. The National Association of College and University
Business Officers has suggested for college planning that an FCI of less <10% Repair
than 5 percent is good, an FCI between 5 and 10 percent is fair, and an 10-19% Renovate
FCI greater than 10 percent is poor. In K-12 public school planning,
the gulf between 10 percent and 100 percent is just not stratified 20-29%
enough. For several years, Magellan Consulting has used the chart 30-39%
displayed to the right, with clients to provide a little more gradation.
40-49%
We often find district-wide FCI averages in the 20 to 30 percent range.
50-59%
Schools in the 30 to 60 percent range are probably the most difficult
to plan for long-term. Financial modeling has shown that over a 30- 60-69% Replace
year period, schools that fall in the 65 percent or greater range are
70-79%
more cost-effective to replace than to repair. This is due to efficiency
gains with more modern facilities and the value of the building at the 80-89%
end of the analysis period. Of course, FCI is not the only factor used
90-100%
to identify buildings that need renovation, replacement or even
closure. Historical significance, enrollment trends, community >100%
sentiment, and the availability of capital are additional factors that are
analyzed when making school facility decision.

The FCI calculation, while seemingly simple, yields a consistent result that can commonly be compared
across districts, as the same factors are almost always considered in deriving the numerator and the
denominator. It should also be noted that there are nuances regarding the process for calculating FCI
that must be understood.

FCI: The Denominator


The denominator is the bottom part of the equation and possibly the easiest with which to start. The
denominator is the theoretical cost to replace the facility. It is important to recognize that this cost is
based on the replacement of a building with another facility that is the same size and is fully
code compliant. If, for example, you are comparing the FCI on a 3,450 square foot gymnasium building
at a campus, the replacement cost is the theoretical cost to replace that same 3,450 square foot
building. For the purpose of FCI, it is not important whether the district actually replaces that building.
Depending on campus type and other factors that might include joint use, the district might decided to
replace the 3,450 building with a 12,000 square foot gymnasium building that would be built to the
district’s current educational specifications and cost considerably more. For the purposes of FCI, we
are trying to establish a benchmark to compare a group of facilities so the repair costs are compared to
the theoretical cost to replace that same facility.

Since the replacement cost comparison is primarily driven by the type of facility (elementary school,
middle school, high school, administration, etc.), a set of cost models have been developed that estimate
the cost per square foot for new construction. The cost models take into account national industry
averages from a recognized industry data source called RSMeans®, adjusted to Austin, Texas, as well as

Page 192
EXHIBIT "B"

the district’s recent experience in the Austin construction market. The costs per square foot are then
multiplied by the size of the school or building under consideration.

“Construction Cost” is a term that may mean different things to different people. To contractors,
construction cost generally means the amount they are paid to construct the building, and that figure
generally does not include a contingency for unforeseen conditions. To the school district facilities staff,
construction cost typically refers to the planning budget to construct the building plus a small
contingency for unforeseen conditions and may also include the cost to bring utilities to a site. To the
school board, construction cost often means the total costs spent on the project which includes the
architects’ fees and the cost to manage the overall construction program. Therefore, it is important to
be careful which costs to include in the replacement cost denominator calculation. For FCI purposes,
we include all of the costs associated with completing the project for the amount of funding that is
required in total. That includes the base construction cost (often referred to as “hard costs”); plus
inflation; plus professional fees; plus administrative costs for testing, surveys, and advertising; plus
management costs; plus contingencies; plus escalation to an estimated mid-point of construction (often
referred to as “soft costs”). These total costs are significantly more than the base construction cost
paid to the contractor. The following table shows the average costs used in determining the
replacement cost for AISD, based on the building type and the buildings’ gross square footage measured
to the outside of exterior walls.
ES MS HS Admin Portable
Square Feet 82,500 170,000 330,000 20,000 1,536
Cost / SqFt $ 185.54 $ 204.20 $ 201.53 $ 176.65 $ 85.97
Construction Cost $ 15,306,924.11 $ 34,714,158.47 $ 66,504,421.68 $ 3,532,981.28 $ 132,047.22
A/E Services $ 1,224,553.93 $ 2,777,132.68 $ 5,320,353.73 $ 317,968.32 $ 11,884.25
Site/Survey $ 30,613.85 $ 69,428.32 $ 133,008.84 $ 7,065.96 $ 264.09
Permits/Fees $ 68,881.16 $ 156,213.71 $ 299,269.90 $ 15,898.42 $ 198.07
Testing $ 114,801.93 $ 260,356.19 $ 498,783.16 $ 26,497.36 $ 660.24
Furn/Fixt/Equip (FF&E) $ 918,415.45 $ 2,082,849.51 $ 3,990,265.30 $ 141,319.25 $ 7,262.60
Other $ 612,276.96 $ 1,388,566.34 $ 2,660,176.87 $ 137,654.34 $ 6,602.36
Project Budget $ 18,276,467 $ 41,448,705 $ 79,406,279 $ 4,179,385 $ 158,919
Program-level contg @ 10% 1,827,647 4,144,871 7,940,628 417,938 15,892
Program Management $ 1,005,206 $ 2,279,679 $ 4,367,345 $ 229,866 $ 8,741
Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% $ 3,431,999 $ 7,783,337 $ 14,911,101 $ 784,815 $ 29,842
Total Program Cost $ 24,541,319 $ 55,656,592 $ 106,625,354 $ 5,612,004 $ 213,393

Cost Per Square Feet $ 297.47 $ 327.39 $ 323.11 $ 280.60 $ 138.93

FCI: The Numerator


The numerator is the top part of the equation and is a little more complicated. The numerator is the
estimated cost to complete the repairs on the building in its current condition. This repair cost is
generally considered to be like-for-like repairs. Within reason, the deficient conditions would be
repaired or systems replaced to put the building into fully serviceable condition to meet current codes.
This is where it gets complicated. In determining which costs to include in the repair cost, one has to
consider if the same conditions would be included in the replacement facility. Classroom additions, for
instance, would add square footage to the building. It would not be comparable to include the addition’s
new construction cost portion of the repaired facility to a facility of the same size, unless the square
footage was added to the replacement facility cost estimate. One would not include building needs that
have not yet occurred, also called “projected needs,” as that would be comparing a building’s future

Page 193
EXHIBIT "B"

state to that of what would be replaced today. Generally, studies or hazardous material costs that might
be encountered even under a demolition scenario would not be included.

At AISD, the district retained a firm in 2006 to assess all of the facilities in the district and develop cost
estimates to make needed repairs. That effort included a walkthrough of all facilities using architects and
engineers to identify deficient conditions in the buildings. This survey focused, for the most part, on the
condition of the existing buildings and did not include educational adequacy or functional equity type
needs (more on that later). All of the identified needs were grouped into building systems, and a
Uniformat® cost structure supported by RSMeans® nationally-based cost data adjusted to the Austin,
Texas area was employed to develop consistent cost estimates across all schools. These cost estimates,
using the industry standard line item costs, comprise the majority of the costs in the AISD facility
assessment database and are included in the numerator of the FCI calculation. The construction cost
value of all of these deficient conditions, prior to adding soft costs for professional fees, contingency, and
escalation total approximately $444.9 million.

However, the facility condition assessment did not focus on what the assessment industry calls
“educational adequacy” items. Where a building assessment focuses on the condition of the building and
what is broken, an educational adequacy assessment focuses on how well the school supports the
instructional mission and looks objectively at what is missing. As part of this master planning effort,
AISD conducted an educational adequacy assessment of all schools. This assessment made use of the
district’s educational specifications, supplemented with information collected during a three-day
workshop that involved numerous staff, principals, and teachers. A set of standards was developed for
each school type, the buildings typically found on the campus, and for each instructional space. These
standards identified in detail the size of the teaching spaces, the number of students in each space,
physical conditions, plumbing requirements, the number of computer outlets and electrical plugs, and
the type of instructional support for each space, in addition to safety and supervision considerations.
During the summer of 2010, a team of assessors went to each school and collected an inventory of each
space at the classroom level. This data was then compared to the previously developed standards to
identify when an individual space did not meet a specific standard. When an item did not meet the
standard, the condition was noted and a line item was added to the assessment database with a budget
to correct that condition. This has resulted in the identification of approximately $184.8 million in
educational adequacy-related deficiencies.

The combination of the building condition and the educational adequacy items currently represents over
41,000 line items district-wide. Base costs must added up to provide a total that is comparable to the
replacement cost total program budgets use as the denominator of the calculation. Again, the design
and construction industry commonly refers to these costs as “soft costs.” The soft costs factoring is
done at a deficiency level, and every deficiency receives a specific cost allocation. The facilities staff of
AISD has conducted a review of recent projects to gain a better understanding of the associated costs
based on a variety of different types of repairs. The district has an established default soft costs factor
that is added to deficiencies of a standard nature. However, air conditioning and mechanical-related
deficiencies are typically done by mechanical contractors that may require additional engineering
requirements. For this reason, a separate model was established for all HVAC/mechanical repairs. For
life safety-related deficiencies, including security cameras and alarms, the costs are primarily equipment
related and do not have requirements for design and engineering so they too have their own model.
The deficiencies noted for ADA repairs were developed under a slightly different cost structure so a
different factor is applied to these items to provide consistent cost estimates at the project level.
Finally, the functional equity needs for additions and new construction on existing campuses have their

Page 194
EXHIBIT "B"

own soft cost model. The following chart shows the percentage factors that are applied to every $100
of estimated repair cost to derive the total repair cost figure used in calculating the FCI.
Default HVAC Life Safety ADA Equity
Cost Basis $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00
Construction Cost $ 138.46 $ 138.46 $ 103.46 $ 196.37 $ 196.37
A/E Services $ 20.77 $ 20.77 $ 4.14 $ 29.46 $ 29.46
Permits/Fees $ 0.62 $ 0.62 $ 0.47 $ 0.88 $ 0.88
Testing $ 0.42 $ 0.42 $ - $ 0.59 $ 0.59
Other $ 23.26 $ 28.11 $ 1.34 $ 32.99 $ 32.99
Project Budget $ 184 $ 188 $ 109 $ 260 $ 260
Program-level contg @ 10% 18 19 11 26 26
Program Management $ 10 $ 10 $ 6 $ 14 $ 14
Escalation - 3 yrs. @ 5% $ 34 $ 35 $ 21 $ 49 $ 49
Total Program Cost $ 246 $ 253 $ 147 $ 350 $ 350
Soft Cost Factor (%) 78% 83% 42% 78% 78%

The total facility condition cost totals approximately $963.1 million after adding soft costs to the costs
for correcting deficient building and ADA conditions and the educational adequacy costs. During the
August work sessions, the need was approximated at $875 million, but at that time it was believed that
the need would eventually be lowered as data was reviewed. The $875 million figure really represented
the total construction cost (hard cost) required to correct current deficiencies. Indeed the comparable
cost has decreased to about $558.4 million; however, the overall total need is now about $1.1 billion,
including functional equity needs at 44 campuses (discussed in more detail below). Since the August
worksession:

1 Deficiencies have been reviewed and, in some cases, modified by AISD facilities staff (part of
ongoing AISD facility management procedures) – decreased cost.
2 Overlapping cost between ADA studies and building condition deficiencies have been addressed
– decreased cost.
3 Overlapping cost between functional equity deficiencies, ADA deficiencies, and building
condition deficiencies have been addressed – decreased cost.
4 Overlapping cost between educational adequacy deficiencies and building condition deficiencies
have been addressed – decreased cost.
5 Location factor that adjusts RSMeans® data to the Austin area has been corrected – decreased
cost.
6 Algorithm that applies the location factor to RSMeans® data has been corrected – decreased
cost.
7 Revised soft cost models have been developed and applied to accurately reflect the total cost
required to correct deficiencies in a potential capital improvement program – increased cost.

Functional equity needs are different from educational adequacy needs. Educational adequacy is an
analysis of the existing conditions to determine if they meet the district’s educational specifications and
to determine which corrections can logically be made to achieve the standards in an existing structure.
Functional equity is an analysis comparing the area allocations for areas within the school to determine if
they meet the current educational specifications based on the target number of students at the school.
This analysis has resulted in the recommendation for additions to expand libraries, gymnasiums,
cafeterias, administration spaces, and classrooms at several locations. These additions constitute new
space and are therefore not included in the calculation of the FCI. A summary of the functional equity
improvements, although not included in the FCI calculation, is included for reference below.

Page 195
EXHIBIT "B"

Functional Equity Additions / Renovations

School Number and Name Library Gym Cafeteria Admin Classroom Total
009 Anderson HS - 7,558,381 - - 737,651 8,296,032
002 Austin HS 93,707 1,000,768 - 341,590 6,583,925 8,019,990
005 McCallum HS 1,056,715 974,456 - - - 2,031,171
007 Travis HS - 497,614 - - - 497,614

054 Bedichek MS 1,226,494 1,200,183 - 279,273 10,809,492 13,515,442


046 Burnet MS - - 1,121,709 - - 1,121,709
057 Covington MS - - - - 1,256,499 1,256,499
055 Dobie MS - 4,791,499 778,272 - 290,814 5,860,584
051 Martin MS 830,896 1,996,919 - - - 2,827,815
058 Mendez MS - - - - 1,323,155 1,323,155
052 Murchison MS 382,212 - 791,197 252,361 6,564,076 7,989,847
047 O. Henry MS - - 702,568 - 2,492,687 3,195,256
048 Pearce MS - - - - 751,499 751,499
053 Webb MS - - - 703,953 - 703,953

142 Allan ES 756,946 - - - - 756,946


102 Andrews ES 1,197,967 110,786 - - - 1,308,753
149 Barrington ES - 2,377,285 119,095 - - 2,496,380
107 Brentwood ES - 720,110 718,725 - - 1,438,834
109 Brown ES 101,554 2,561,928 - - - 2,663,482
161 Cook ES - 2,949,680 115,402 - - 3,065,082
113 Cunningham ES - 2,543,464 115,402 812,893 - 3,471,759
114 Dawson ES - 913,985 - 284,351 - 1,198,336
154 Doss ES - - - 486,074 - 486,074
116 Govalle ES 847,514 2,460,375 - 177,258 - 3,485,146
117 Gullett ES 1,154,714 482,843 1,442,527 698,414 1,307,276 5,085,774
119 Highland Park ES - 886,289 796,275 - 517,002 2,199,566
155 Hill ES - 2,404,981 135,713 - - 2,540,694
162 Houston ES - 191,106 - - - 191,106
120 Joslin ES 960,146 - 580,704 - - 1,540,850
160 Linder ES 2,901,672 2,331,124 109,863 - 109,863 5,452,522
122 Maplewood ES - - 1,315,585 - 76,858 1,392,443
123 Mathews ES - - - 47,777 2,160,329 2,208,105
150 Norman ES 516,771 - 268,195 670,256 - 1,455,222
151 Pillow ES 1,140,404 - - 979,995 - 2,120,400
130 Pleasant Hill ES - - - 33,697 249,269 282,966
136 St. Elmo ES - 809,200 - - 517,002 1,326,202
127 Sanchez ES - 2,441,910 168,026 - - 2,609,936
139 Sims ES - 717,340 - - - 717,340
158 Sunset Valley ES - 1,955,836 - 101,554 - 2,057,390
140 Travis Heights ES - - - 978,611 - 978,611
166 Williams ES - 1,695,489 - - - 1,695,489
157 Winn ES 2,880,438 2,654,250 839,205 - 124,634 6,498,528
144 Wooten ES - 406,216 - 704,415 - 1,110,631
146 Zilker ES - 2,409,598 - - - 2,409,598
Figures have been adjusted to eliminate overlap between Condition Assessment and ADA Studies

Page 196
EXHIBIT "B"

FCI Results
For AISD, the FCI calculations include the building condition assessment results, the educational
adequacy assessment results, and the type one and two ADA compliance considerations and then
compare them to the cost of replacing the same facility. These FCI figures provide a benchmark that can
be used to consistently compare AISD facilities district-wide. The planning team refers to the FCI to aid
in decision making when a school or building is subject to renovation, when a change in educational
program is contemplated, or when the school is targeted for replacement, consolidation, or closure for
efficiency reasons. It is not the principle driver, but rather a supporting consideration to guide the
district and hopefully prohibit the district from making additional investment into a building that is close
to or has reached the end of its serviceable life. The following chart is a summary of all of the district’s
facilities by FCI. The one school that falls in the 70-79 percent range is Pease Elementary, a historic
location celebrated as the longest operating public school in the state.

FCI Campuses

<10% Repair 18
10-19% Renovate 35
20-29% 30
30-39% 31
40-49% 9
50-59% 2
60-69% Replace -
70-79% 1
80-89% -
90-100% -
>100% -

Total 126

Page 197
EXHIBIT "B"

AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC


Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA
Total Facility Total
Grades Total Priority Condition FCI Related Replacement Functional Educational
No. Campus Name Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2 1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Cost Facility Cost Cost FCI Equity Adequacy

Elementary Schools
142 Allan Elementary School PK-5 1957 19.5 $ 1,254,683 $ 1,688,882 $ 2,943,565 $ 6,645,881 $ 558,919 $ 1,074,557 $ 11,222,922 $ 10,148,366 $ 33,497,560 30.3% $ 1,030,588 $ 1,511,428
101 Allison Elementary School PK-6 1955 10.7 $ 173,617 $ 1,354,132 $ 1,527,749 $ 2,450,503 $ 210,014 $ 10,288 $ 4,198,553 $ 4,188,265 $ 20,556,998 20.4% $ - $ 907,125
102 Andrews Elementary School PK-5 1962 7.7 $ 573,941 $ 2,633,109 $ 3,207,050 $ 3,502,631 $ 190,659 $ 1,517,264 $ 8,417,604 $ 6,737,774 $ 21,020,456 32.1% $ 1,453,514 $ 1,030,292
187 Baldwin Elementary School PK-5 2010 0.0 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.0% $ - $ -
182 Baranoff Elementary School K-5 1999 15.6 $ 197,873 $ 531,250 $ 729,123 $ 1,814,399 $ 277,997 $ 121,554 $ 2,943,072 $ 2,821,518 $ 25,651,479 11.0% $ - $ 1,069,123
149 Barrington Elementary School PK-6 1969 12.1 $ 329,948 $ 476,461 $ 806,409 $ 5,220,479 $ 311,342 $ 2,708,483 $ 9,046,714 $ 6,338,231 $ 29,888,351 21.2% $ 2,688,134 $ 1,146,187
103 Barton Hills Elementary School K-6 1964 9.9 $ 1,022,269 $ 236,671 $ 1,258,939 $ 2,637,192 $ 447,186 $ 2,391 $ 4,345,708 $ 4,343,317 $ 14,588,847 29.8% $ - $ 439,914
104 Becker Elementary School PK-5 1936 3.7 $ 1,114,902 $ 2,117,554 $ 3,232,456 $ 3,621,985 $ 252,949 $ 118,363 $ 7,225,752 $ 7,107,389 $ 18,663,896 38.1% $ - $ 977,746
105 Blackshear Elementary School PK-5 1903 5.3 $ 188,148 $ 2,178,265 $ 2,366,412 $ 4,202,512 $ 796,536 $ 58,019 $ 7,423,480 $ 7,365,461 $ 21,038,900 35.0% $ - $ 705,474
106 Blanton Elementary School PK-5 1964 8.0 $ 642,778 $ 1,082,233 $ 1,725,011 $ 2,850,419 $ 230,709 $ 59,146 $ 4,865,285 $ 4,806,139 $ 24,561,843 19.6% $ - $ 1,313,917
185 Blazier Elementary School PK-5 2008 15.4 $ 136,781 $ 177,879 $ 314,660 $ 897,555 $ 205,711 $ - $ 1,417,926 $ 1,417,926 $ 27,857,817 5.1% $ - $ 978,883
170 Boone Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.5 $ 489,966 $ 135,370 $ 625,336 $ 2,854,265 $ 348,141 $ 318,391 $ 4,146,133 $ 3,827,742 $ 21,920,602 17.5% $ - $ 991,368
107 Brentwood Elementary School PK-5 1951 16.7 $ 286,613 $ 693,809 $ 980,422 $ 3,381,304 $ 190,212 $ 1,625,875 $ 6,177,813 $ 4,551,938 $ 19,622,049 23.2% $ 1,622,094 $ 973,002
108 Brooke Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.9 $ 466,533 $ 728,683 $ 1,195,217 $ 2,708,300 $ 262,136 $ 37,886 $ 4,203,538 $ 4,165,652 $ 16,699,995 24.9% $ - $ 888,465
109 Brown Elementary School PK-6 1957 10.1 $ 1,580,199 $ 1,153,153 $ 2,733,352 $ 1,909,309 $ 635,293 $ 2,665,997 $ 7,943,951 $ 5,277,954 $ 18,761,168 28.1% $ 2,663,484 $ 801,611
110 Bryker Woods Elementary School K-6 1939 6.3 $ 189,411 $ 1,119,527 $ 1,308,938 $ 2,979,081 $ 348,606 $ 44,654 $ 4,681,279 $ 4,636,625 $ 13,901,689 33.4% $ - $ 863,756
111 Campbell Elementary School PK-5 1992 9.7 $ 311,592 $ 379,698 $ 691,291 $ 3,030,703 $ 197,160 $ 377,355 $ 4,296,509 $ 3,919,154 $ 18,838,511 20.8% $ - $ 766,024
173 Casey Elementary School PK-5 1998 17.9 $ 332,832 $ 218,621 $ 551,453 $ 1,280,715 $ 2,281,070 $ 78,748 $ 4,191,986 $ 4,113,238 $ 24,702,547 16.7% $ - $ 930,563
112 Casis Elementary School PK-5 1951 14.2 $ 280,022 $ 632,024 $ 912,046 $ 3,096,268 $ 731,873 $ 60,579 $ 4,800,767 $ 4,740,187 $ 27,288,458 17.4% $ - $ 1,460,287
184 Clayton Elementary School K-5 2006 16.8 $ 136,427 $ 382,446 $ 518,872 $ 1,142,866 $ 215,392 $ - $ 1,877,130 $ 1,877,130 $ 31,551,211 5.9% $ - $ 1,404,862
161 Cook Elementary School K-5 1974 12.7 $ 847,723 $ 3,046,998 $ 3,894,721 $ 2,836,484 $ 275,616 $ 3,529,726 $ 10,536,548 $ 7,006,822 $ 25,515,832 27.5% $ 3,472,684 $ 1,093,546
183 Cowan Elementary School PK-5 1999 22.5 $ 441,004 $ 282,482 $ 723,486 $ 1,163,772 $ 269,668 $ 287,289 $ 2,444,215 $ 2,156,926 $ 23,634,032 9.1% $ - $ 1,007,303
113 Cunningham Elementary School PK-5 1963 8.8 $ 174,656 $ 203,988 $ 378,644 $ 8,662,602 $ 475,256 $ 3,523,663 $ 13,040,166 $ 9,488,259 $ 27,695,695 34.3% $ 3,471,761 $ 1,336,362
179 Davis Elementary School PK-5 1993 13.2 $ 375,946 $ 245,779 $ 621,725 $ 4,466,364 $ 242,164 $ 172,691 $ 5,502,944 $ 5,330,253 $ 22,832,945 23.3% $ - $ 1,062,050
114 Dawson Elementary School PK-5 1954 8.7 $ 825,023 $ 1,788,448 $ 2,613,471 $ 2,164,807 $ 124,053 $ 1,374,936 $ 6,277,266 $ 4,902,331 $ 18,054,973 27.2% $ 1,332,942 $ 812,429
154 Doss Elementary School PK-5 1970 9.7 $ 277,493 $ 1,753,192 $ 2,030,684 $ 3,366,419 $ 262,383 $ 585,467 $ 6,244,954 $ 5,659,486 $ 21,571,372 26.2% $ 548,668 $ 867,630
176 Galindo Elementary School PK-5 1989 10.8 $ 718,525 $ 472,173 $ 1,190,697 $ 1,724,238 $ 237,955 $ 162,944 $ 3,315,834 $ 3,152,890 $ 27,712,949 11.4% $ - $ 1,255,082
116 Govalle Elementary School PK-5 1940 8.4 $ 340,133 $ 1,139,527 $ 1,479,660 $ 4,269,803 $ 1,386,730 $ 3,711,107 $ 10,847,299 $ 7,136,192 $ 23,095,017 30.9% $ 3,614,398 $ 935,305
159 Graham Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.9 $ 776,380 $ 3,942,191 $ 4,718,571 $ 2,175,356 $ 462,863 $ 145,540 $ 7,502,330 $ 7,356,790 $ 24,196,550 30.4% $ - $ 874,097
117 Gullett Elementary School K-5 1956 17.9 $ 296,279 $ 477,899 $ 774,178 $ 3,404,040 $ 278,491 $ 5,578,522 $ 10,035,231 $ 4,456,709 $ 15,275,706 29.2% $ 5,538,153 $ 1,100,391
118 Harris Elementary School PK-5 1955 7.3 $ 168,662 $ 462,786 $ 631,447 $ 3,593,988 $ 351,166 $ 26,321 $ 4,602,922 $ 4,576,600 $ 21,247,129 21.5% $ - $ 1,301,321
163 Hart Elementary School PK-5 1998 15.7 $ 440,103 $ 429,303 $ 869,405 $ 1,705,738 $ 330,538 $ 150,402 $ 3,056,083 $ 2,905,681 $ 28,219,837 10.3% $ - $ 1,071,119
119 Highland Park Elementary School K-5 1952 6.3 $ 378,590 $ 549,487 $ 928,077 $ 5,117,848 $ 220,844 $ 2,357,371 $ 8,624,139 $ 6,266,769 $ 20,158,386 31.1% $ 2,314,969 $ 1,112,435
155 Hill Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.9 $ 369,298 $ 762,743 $ 1,132,041 $ 4,753,883 $ 395,173 $ 2,849,188 $ 9,130,285 $ 6,281,096 $ 23,453,170 26.8% $ 2,816,276 $ 921,105
162 Houston Elementary School PK-5 1976 13.8 $ 347,984 $ 5,056,005 $ 5,403,989 $ 4,782,952 $ 313,940 $ 513,050 $ 11,013,932 $ 10,500,882 $ 28,771,349 36.5% $ 452,838 $ 1,698,239
178 Jordan Elementary School PK-5 1992 11.5 $ 344,244 $ 526,308 $ 870,552 $ 4,497,788 $ 305,917 $ 366,415 $ 6,040,673 $ 5,674,257 $ 25,804,974 22.0% $ - $ 1,294,151
120 Joslin Elementary School PK-5 1954 5.1 $ 365,427 $ 1,658,814 $ 2,024,241 $ 3,828,081 $ 489,316 $ 1,761,730 $ 8,103,367 $ 6,341,638 $ 15,618,987 40.6% $ 1,726,417 $ 905,386
180 Kiker Elementary School K-5 1992 12.4 $ 465,453 $ 285,692 $ 751,145 $ 3,481,469 $ 231,480 $ 270,058 $ 4,734,153 $ 4,464,095 $ 27,275,667 16.4% $ - $ 945,244
172 Kocurek Elementary School PK-5 1986 12.3 $ 276,757 $ 739,213 $ 1,015,969 $ 4,710,718 $ 337,850 $ 84,409 $ 6,148,946 $ 6,064,538 $ 23,816,680 25.5% $ - $ 1,239,761
168 Langford Elementary School PK-5 1980 10.7 $ 543,183 $ 5,823,122 $ 6,366,305 $ 2,847,265 $ 293,128 $ 600,073 $ 10,106,772 $ 9,506,698 $ 28,303,131 33.6% $ - $ 1,519,228
121 Lee Elementary School K-6 1939 4.8 $ 426,784 $ 1,565,236 $ 1,992,020 $ 3,564,212 $ 200,247 $ 36,675 $ 5,793,153 $ 5,756,478 $ 13,990,931 41.1% $ - $ 1,268,395
160 Linder Elementary School PK-5 1972 9.1 $ 170,717 $ 1,486,942 $ 1,657,659 $ 3,064,256 $ 373,892 $ 5,824,800 $ 10,920,607 $ 5,095,807 $ 25,625,896 19.9% $ 5,754,971 $ 876,187
131 Lucy Read Pre-K School PK 1961 9.9 $ 191,332 $ 843,430 $ 1,034,762 $ 1,221,125 $ 154,414 $ 9,470 $ 2,419,771 $ 2,410,301 $ 21,971,173 11.0% $ - $ 715,064
122 Maplewood Elementary School PK-6 1951 6.4 $ 1,630,235 $ 367,527 $ 1,997,762 $ 3,955,287 $ 119,540 $ 2,005,569 $ 8,078,158 $ 6,072,588 $ 16,243,675 37.4% $ 1,958,007 $ 648,571
123 Mathews Elementary School PK-6 1916 2.3 $ 103,898 $ 1,407,923 $ 1,511,822 $ 2,537,969 $ 285,980 $ 2,282,922 $ 6,618,692 $ 4,335,770 $ 13,897,228 31.2% $ 2,258,699 $ 841,669
165 McBee Elementary School K-5 1999 10.9 $ 237,524 $ 319,343 $ 556,867 $ 1,036,048 $ 242,383 $ 57,384 $ 1,892,682 $ 1,835,298 $ 23,236,719 7.9% $ - $ 883,087

Page 198
EXHIBIT "B"

AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC


Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA
Total Facility Total
Grades Total Priority Condition FCI Related Replacement Functional Educational
No. Campus Name Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2 1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Cost Facility Cost Cost FCI Equity Adequacy
147 Menchaca Elementary School PK-5 1975 19.8 $ 237,446 $ 4,313,709 $ 4,551,155 $ 2,516,965 $ 693,652 $ 82,611 $ 7,844,383 $ 7,761,772 $ 21,040,089 36.9% $ - $ 1,093,862
124 Metz Elementary School PK-5 1993 6.4 $ 245,693 $ 2,198,147 $ 2,443,840 $ 3,224,075 $ 239,898 $ 213,073 $ 6,120,886 $ 5,907,813 $ 19,328,741 30.6% $ - $ 958,961
181 Mills Elementary School PK-5 1998 10.7 $ 254,583 $ 438,024 $ 692,608 $ 2,241,637 $ 604,743 $ 163,005 $ 3,701,993 $ 3,538,989 $ 27,859,900 12.7% $ - $ 1,316,271
150 Norman Elementary School PK-5 1970 10.2 $ 491,997 $ 1,618,873 $ 2,110,870 $ 3,488,359 $ 249,133 $ 1,961,658 $ 7,810,019 $ 5,819,127 $ 17,864,592 32.6% $ 1,896,243 $ 880,325
148 Oak Hill Elementary School PK-5 1974 13.7 $ 577,910 $ 2,562,750 $ 3,140,659 $ 5,082,614 $ 417,412 $ 46,822 $ 8,687,508 $ 8,640,685 $ 25,741,908 33.6% $ - $ 1,650,197
125 Oak Springs Elementary School PK-5 1958 8.6 $ 436,196 $ 1,544,778 $ 1,980,974 $ 1,913,526 $ 218,887 $ 30,328 $ 4,143,715 $ 4,113,386 $ 15,839,115 26.0% $ - $ 712,476
156 Odom Elementary School PK-5 1970 8.6 $ 314,793 $ 555,080 $ 869,872 $ 3,051,516 $ 304,204 $ 75,095 $ 4,300,687 $ 4,225,593 $ 22,017,089 19.2% $ - $ 783,022
126 Ortega Elementary School PK-5 1959 7.4 $ 554,133 $ 2,585,580 $ 3,139,712 $ 2,666,838 $ 188,616 $ 55,295 $ 6,050,462 $ 5,995,167 $ 14,984,780 40.0% $ - $ 794,706
189 Overton Elementary School PK-5 2007 70.4 $ 129,148 $ 222,703 $ 351,852 $ 812,642 $ 285,677 $ - $ 1,450,171 $ 1,450,171 $ 30,773,624 4.7% $ - $ 1,014,803
171 Palm Elementary School PK-5 1987 13.2 $ 326,618 $ 355,630 $ 682,248 $ 1,716,073 $ 302,890 $ 156,623 $ 2,857,834 $ 2,701,211 $ 24,438,393 11.1% $ - $ 1,129,509
143 Patton Elementary School PK-5 1986 24.1 $ 553,125 $ 1,351,958 $ 1,905,083 $ 2,641,513 $ 172,467 $ 309,114 $ 5,028,177 $ 4,719,062 $ 26,010,525 18.1% $ - $ 969,016
128 Pease Elementary School K-6 1876 2.8 $ 366,438 $ 2,838,820 $ 3,205,258 $ 4,030,819 $ 795,232 $ 51,831 $ 8,083,139 $ 8,031,308 $ 10,597,089 75.8% $ - $ 743,252
129 Pecan Springs Elementary School PK-5 1957 7.6 $ 204,113 $ 354,593 $ 558,706 $ 5,221,971 $ 1,542,355 $ 90,134 $ 7,413,166 $ 7,323,032 $ 19,694,928 37.2% $ - $ 1,346,708
190 Perez Elementary School PK-5 2006 28.0 $ 1,206,199 $ 216,162 $ 1,422,361 $ 1,028,182 $ 150,809 $ - $ 2,601,352 $ 2,601,352 $ 29,028,065 9.0% $ - $ 1,027,736
164 Pickle Elementary School PK-5 2001 17.5 $ 267,092 $ 283,194 $ 550,286 $ 1,241,301 $ 347,992 $ 116,853 $ 2,256,432 $ 2,139,580 $ 37,780,539 5.7% $ - $ 1,225,897
151 Pillow Elementary School PK-5 1969 10.0 $ 223,451 $ 347,521 $ 570,972 $ 7,437,607 $ 293,128 $ 2,716,120 $ 11,017,828 $ 8,301,708 $ 19,335,286 42.9% $ 2,695,012 $ 1,237,573
130 Pleasant Hill Elementary School PK-5 1985 10.1 $ 338,974 $ 421,776 $ 760,750 $ 3,408,419 $ 101,031 $ 473,908 $ 4,744,109 $ 4,270,200 $ 21,837,014 19.6% $ 367,071 $ 767,791
132 Reilly Elementary School PK-5 1954 10.8 $ 397,166 $ 785,780 $ 1,182,946 $ 2,658,687 $ 203,051 $ 11,517 $ 4,056,202 $ 4,044,685 $ 14,216,116 28.5% $ - $ 623,670
133 Ridgetop Elementary School PK-5 1939 5.0 $ 165,485 $ 1,164,852 $ 1,330,337 $ 1,527,895 $ 899,377 $ 22,541 $ 3,780,150 $ 3,757,609 $ 11,956,232 31.4% $ - $ 492,082
174 Rodriguez Elementary School PK-5 1999 15.0 $ 229,804 $ 335,591 $ 565,395 $ 1,437,448 $ 305,732 $ 64,181 $ 2,372,756 $ 2,308,575 $ 28,810,020 8.0% $ - $ 1,238,887
127 Sanchez Elementary School PK-5 1976 9.2 $ 169,463 $ 3,527,025 $ 3,696,487 $ 2,600,313 $ 340,250 $ 2,934,744 $ 9,571,794 $ 6,637,050 $ 25,069,329 26.5% $ 2,843,511 $ 1,158,542
139 Sims Elementary School PK-5 1956 8.4 $ 929,492 $ 624,530 $ 1,554,022 $ 4,091,216 $ 273,990 $ 868,224 $ 6,787,451 $ 5,919,228 $ 15,016,609 39.4% $ 837,082 $ 928,787
136 St. Elmo Elementary School PK-5 1960 9.4 $ 516,693 $ 681,703 $ 1,198,396 $ 4,849,681 $ 238,602 $ 1,342,548 $ 7,629,227 $ 6,286,679 $ 15,255,478 41.2% $ 1,326,203 $ 1,045,047
138 Summitt Elementary School PK-5 1986 14.5 $ 459,077 $ 411,250 $ 870,328 $ 5,355,622 $ 258,428 $ 177,876 $ 6,662,254 $ 6,484,378 $ 25,777,010 25.2% $ - $ 1,075,677
158 Sunset Valley Elementary School PK-5 1971 10.4 $ 170,770 $ 2,801,633 $ 2,972,404 $ 5,549,996 $ 235,908 $ 2,385,867 $ 11,144,175 $ 8,758,308 $ 20,685,803 42.3% $ 2,339,157 $ 1,005,839
140 Travis Heights Elementary School PK-5 1938 3.2 $ 964,451 $ 2,480,760 $ 3,445,212 $ 3,035,427 $ 505,213 $ 1,545,119 $ 8,530,971 $ 6,985,852 $ 19,096,715 36.6% $ 1,471,609 $ 991,804
141 Walnut Creek Elementary School K-6 1961 11.5 $ 378,361 $ 1,157,572 $ 1,535,934 $ 2,650,418 $ 199,636 $ 10,090 $ 4,396,078 $ 4,385,988 $ 28,685,677 15.3% $ - $ 1,064,371
175 Widen Elementary School PK-5 1986 10.7 $ 344,749 $ 519,889 $ 864,638 $ 2,387,370 $ 207,421 $ 244,825 $ 3,704,253 $ 3,459,428 $ 26,737,543 12.9% $ - $ 1,026,980
166 Williams Elementary School PK-5 1976 14.0 $ 207,027 $ 3,996,735 $ 4,203,762 $ 3,314,316 $ 634,239 $ 2,107,462 $ 10,259,778 $ 8,123,194 $ 22,031,262 36.9% $ 2,037,080 $ 1,806,830
157 Winn Elementary School PK-5 1970 10.0 $ 449,115 $ 758,666 $ 1,207,781 $ 2,895,852 $ 360,778 $ 6,696,886 $ 11,161,297 $ 4,464,411 $ 19,839,796 22.5% $ 6,617,626 $ 1,369,856
152 Wooldridge Elementary School K-5 1969 11.6 $ 681,037 $ 1,779,983 $ 2,461,020 $ 3,258,538 $ 345,503 $ 3,072 $ 6,068,132 $ 6,065,060 $ 26,329,413 23.0% $ - $ 961,821
144 Wooten Elementary School PK-5 1955 6.7 $ 1,154,161 $ 3,089,669 $ 4,243,830 $ 6,189,133 $ 541,732 $ 1,429,495 $ 12,404,189 $ 10,974,694 $ 21,453,872 51.2% $ 1,380,857 $ 1,403,037
145 Zavala Elementary School PK-6 1937 3.4 $ 874,332 $ 410,359 $ 1,284,691 $ 5,062,642 $ 414,056 $ 19,700 $ 6,781,088 $ 6,761,389 $ 20,624,524 32.8% $ - $ 1,032,634
146 Zilker Elementary School PK-6 1950 11.8 $ 895,527 $ 1,978,488 $ 2,874,015 $ 6,699,936 $ 776,182 $ 2,565,129 $ 12,915,262 $ 10,350,133 $ 18,351,848 56.4% $ 2,409,599 $ 1,023,970

Page 199
EXHIBIT "B"

AISD School/Facility FCI Summary Total minus NC


Priorities 1-5 and Some ADA
Total
Grades Total Priority Total Facility FCI Related Replacement Functional Educational
No. Campus Name Served Age Site Priority 1 Priority 2 1 and 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Condition Cost Facility Cost Cost FCI Equity Adequacy

Middle Schools
059 Bailey Middle School 6-8 1993 41.3 $ 718,590 $ 2,307,324 $ 3,025,915 $ 4,249,984 $ 1,260,797 $ 175,348 $ 8,712,044 $ 8,538,264 $ 52,022,435 16.4% $ - $ 2,483,427
054 Bedichek Middle School 6-8 1972 23.3 $ 6,051,876 $ 3,947,712 $ 9,999,588 $ 4,289,394 $ 1,517,014 $ 13,820,241 $ 29,626,237 $ 15,805,996 $ 51,604,343 30.6% $ 13,761,948 $ 2,467,186
046 Burnet Middle School 6-8 1961 23.7 $ 696,528 $ 7,228,821 $ 7,925,349 $ 8,242,121 $ 1,461,392 $ 1,228,083 $ 18,856,946 $ 17,628,862 $ 51,140,088 34.5% $ 1,167,871 $ 2,786,054
057 Covington Middle School 6-8 1986 21.3 $ 961,398 $ 3,791,641 $ 4,753,039 $ 5,457,787 $ 679,240 $ 1,960,490 $ 12,850,556 $ 10,890,066 $ 58,357,322 18.7% $ 1,633,542 $ 2,218,938
055 Dobie Middle School 6-8 1973 20.2 $ 819,317 $ 1,032,156 $ 1,851,474 $ 3,993,260 $ 1,153,996 $ 6,327,599 $ 13,326,328 $ 6,998,729 $ 46,067,662 15.2% $ 6,294,500 $ 2,605,739
043 Fulmore Middle School 6-8 1911 9.8 $ 1,675,047 $ 7,905,746 $ 9,580,793 $ 11,125,201 $ 1,520,831 $ 353,775 $ 22,580,600 $ 22,226,825 $ 54,800,107 40.6% $ - $ 1,873,471
056 Garcia Middle School 6-8 2008 41.3 $ 341,779 $ 375,320 $ 717,098 $ 1,477,213 $ 256,690 $ - $ 2,451,001 $ 2,451,001 $ 52,634,348 4.7% $ - $ 1,785,189
062 Gorzycki Middle School 6-8 2009 14.2 $ 309,464 $ 330,542 $ 640,006 $ 1,551,469 $ 435,269 $ - $ 2,626,743 $ 2,626,743 $ 57,473,012 4.6% $ - $ 1,948,774
044 Kealing Middle School 6-8 1986 13.2 $ 375,942 $ 4,974,961 $ 5,350,903 $ 5,384,570 $ 962,232 $ 464,321 $ 12,162,026 $ 11,697,705 $ 62,920,315 18.6% $ - $ 2,797,674
045 Lamar Middle School 6-8 1955 14.3 $ 868,115 $ 2,862,857 $ 3,730,973 $ 3,240,381 $ 1,109,337 $ 19,344 $ 8,100,034 $ 7,963,458 $ 41,245,693 19.3% $ - $ 2,294,389
051 Martin Middle School 6-8 1966 9.9 $ 529,628 $ 6,008,583 $ 6,538,211 $ 4,037,673 $ 630,629 $ 3,297,183 $ 14,503,696 $ 11,206,513 $ 38,873,997 28.8% $ 3,222,769 $ 1,488,156
058 Mendez Middle School 6-8 1987 20.7 $ 1,080,210 $ 4,069,741 $ 5,149,951 $ 3,162,498 $ 903,869 $ 1,830,512 $ 11,046,831 $ 9,216,319 $ 61,291,493 15.0% $ 1,701,214 $ 2,294,128
052 Murchison Middle School 6-8 1967 26.2 $ 485,127 $ 1,623,549 $ 2,108,676 $ 5,951,701 $ 1,040,012 $ 8,153,256 $ 17,253,644 $ 9,100,388 $ 45,706,537 19.9% $ 7,989,851 $ 1,754,965
047 O. Henry Middle School 6-8 1953 13.8 $ 287,063 $ 788,273 $ 1,075,336 $ 4,249,201 $ 368,706 $ 3,270,833 $ 8,964,076 $ 5,693,243 $ 42,714,090 13.3% $ 3,236,248 $ 1,604,680
061 Paredes Middle School 6-8 2000 78.2 $ 639,397 $ 655,597 $ 1,294,994 $ 2,788,004 $ 1,505,034 $ 274,674 $ 5,862,705 $ 5,588,032 $ 50,694,496 11.0% $ - $ 3,031,743
048 Pearce Middle School 6-8 1958 14.8 $ 797,160 $ 1,469,168 $ 2,266,328 $ 3,870,033 $ 437,683 $ 797,883 $ 7,371,927 $ 6,574,044 $ 43,914,998 15.0% $ 770,887 $ 1,421,448
028 Ann Richards School 6-10 1958 15.3 $ 1,751,415 $ 2,490,074 $ 4,241,489 $ 10,459,899 $ 775,306 $ 126,188 $ 15,602,883 $ 15,476,695 $ 45,071,376 34.3% $ - $ 1,975,612
060 Small Middle School 6-8 1999 36.5 $ 354,444 $ 1,045,835 $ 1,400,279 $ 1,980,661 $ 354,205 $ 162,029 $ 3,897,174 $ 3,735,145 $ 54,088,993 6.9% $ - $ 1,928,150
053 Webb Middle School 6-8 1961 15.6 $ 420,533 $ 3,515,438 $ 3,935,971 $ 3,080,033 $ 1,413,498 $ 733,661 $ 9,163,164 $ 8,429,502 $ 42,628,637 19.8% $ 703,954 $ 2,101,392

High Schools
017 Akins High School 9-12 2000 57.7 $ 954,259 $ 1,208,558 $ 2,162,817 $ 3,966,511 $ 1,452,488 $ 134,171 $ 7,715,986 $ 7,581,815 $ 115,209,011 6.6% $ - $ 4,294,809
009 Anderson High School 9-12 1973 38.8 $ 883,879 $ 7,269,324 $ 8,153,203 $ 9,335,056 $ 1,959,665 $ 8,421,936 $ 27,869,861 $ 27,743,960 $ 100,442,692 27.6% $ 8,296,036 $ 5,596,292
002 Austin High School 9-12 1975 44.3 $ 1,821,769 $ 8,599,187 $ 10,420,955 $ 17,067,949 $ 4,155,102 $ 8,187,414 $ 39,831,421 $ 31,644,007 $ 101,704,101 31.1% $ 8,019,994 $ 4,786,572
013 Bowie High School 9-12 1988 66.0 $ 1,142,743 $ 13,619,484 $ 14,762,227 $ 14,517,730 $ 15,147,412 $ 884,595 $ 45,311,964 $ 44,427,369 $ 141,414,289 31.4% $ - $ 16,682,721
008 Crockett High School 9-12 1969 39.5 $ 1,822,148 $ 10,610,065 $ 12,432,213 $ 19,394,213 $ 3,011,592 $ 186,183 $ 35,024,201 $ 34,838,018 $ 111,743,044 31.2% $ - $ 3,899,330
019 Eastside Memorial High Schools (EMHSJC) 9-12 1960 27.6 $ 3,510,942 $ 12,123,425 $ 15,634,366 $ 7,266,111 $ 650,888 $ 213,544 $ 23,764,910 $ 23,551,366 $ 87,276,402 27.0% $ - $ 2,370,779
015 Garza Independence High School 11-12 1939 3.1 $ 528,781 $ 925,712 $ 1,454,494 $ 1,791,072 $ 516,483 $ 198,632 $ 3,960,682 $ 3,762,050 $ 17,523,392 21.5% $ - $ 1,160,890
029 International High School 9-10 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.0% $ - $ -
014 Johnson (LBJ) High School 9-12 1974 41.4 $ 1,082,734 $ 3,932,853 $ 5,015,587 $ 7,240,361 $ 1,922,200 $ 96,326 $ 14,274,474 $ 14,178,148 $ 98,621,982 14.4% $ - $ 3,610,445
004 Lanier High School 9-12 1966 28.5 $ 1,328,937 $ 4,526,958 $ 5,855,895 $ 12,659,556 $ 1,639,563 $ 176,389 $ 20,331,402 $ 20,155,013 $ 91,315,888 22.1% $ - $ 3,798,556
018 LASA 9-12 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 0.0% $ - $ -
005 McCallum High School 9-12 1953 31.1 $ 1,149,580 $ 3,763,557 $ 4,913,137 $ 10,864,608 $ 1,362,340 $ 2,583,395 $ 19,723,479 $ 17,140,084 $ 83,866,651 20.4% $ 2,352,452 $ 3,347,251
006 Reagan High School 9-12 1965 31.8 $ 1,208,310 $ 865,508 $ 2,073,817 $ 12,941,528 $ 3,120,501 $ 348,003 $ 18,483,850 $ 18,135,847 $ 81,643,031 22.2% $ - $ 5,067,540
007 Travis High School 9-12 1953 34.8 $ 1,049,482 $ 1,617,099 $ 2,666,581 $ 24,320,432 $ 1,903,928 $ 870,745 $ 29,761,687 $ 28,890,942 $ 95,250,042 30.3% $ 685,951 $ 3,901,369

Other Facilities
852 Clifton Center Alt. Ed. 1977 7.8 $ 255,304 $ 1,789,699 $ 2,045,003 $ 2,557,341 $ 752,437 $ 36,615 $ 5,391,397 $ 5,354,782 $ 13,110,071 40.8% $ - $ 1,163,512
012 Ridgeview ALC 6-12 1953 19.8 $ 594,690 $ 1,052,657 $ 1,647,347 $ 7,759,365 $ 1,468,980 $ 32,018 $ 10,907,709 $ 10,875,692 $ 31,629,925 34.4% $ - $ 843,199
251 Rosedale School Alt. Ed. 1939 4.9 $ 492,433 $ 462,750 $ 955,183 $ 3,490,585 $ 251,739 $ 68,255 $ 4,765,762 $ 4,697,506 $ 14,472,614 32.5% $ - $ 777,226
252 Baker Center 1911 4.8 $ 282,216 $ 1,676,261 $ 1,958,477 $ 1,224,224 $ - $ 202,910 $ 3,385,610 $ 3,182,700 $ 18,483,157 17.2% $ - $ -
951 Burger Athletic Complex 1977 48.1 $ 1,189,463 $ 7,099,714 $ 8,289,176 $ 3,529,618 $ 35,546 $ 42,012 $ 11,896,352 $ 11,854,340 $ 50,681,646 23.4% $ - $ -
941 Carruth Administration Center 1991 2.8 $ 180,247 $ 903,444 $ 1,083,691 $ 5,448,615 $ 269,285 $ - $ 6,801,590 $ 6,801,590 $ 37,598,528 18.1% $ - $ -
922 Central Warehouse 1983 18.7 $ 268,665 $ 404,270 $ 672,935 $ 725,905 $ - $ 11,195 $ 1,410,034 $ 1,398,840 $ 27,023,496 5.2% $ - $ -
949 Delco Activity Center 2003 44.1 $ 259,623 $ 205,193 $ 464,817 $ 170,579 $ 10,355 $ - $ 645,750 $ 645,750 $ 16,919,044 3.8% $ - $ -
948 House Park 1936 11.1 $ 137,227 $ 70,034 $ 207,260 $ 730,632 $ - $ 157,489 $ 1,095,381 $ 915,722 $ 8,999,133 10.2% $ - $ -
281 Nelson Field 1963 20.1 $ 422,773 $ - $ 422,773 $ 1,663,288 $ - $ 91,966 $ 2,178,027 $ 2,086,061 $ 16,557,338 12.6% $ - $ -
959 Nelson Field Bus Terminal 1995 6.6 $ 70,197 $ 81,921 $ 152,119 $ 58,564 $ 61,039 $ 24,167 $ 295,889 $ 271,722 $ 4,105,030 6.6% $ - $ -
950 Noack Sports Complex 2004 11.2 $ 126,224 $ - $ 126,224 $ - $ - $ - $ 126,224 $ 126,224 $ 906,929 13.9% $ - $ -
942 Pleasant Hill Annex 1936 2.0 $ 270,019 $ 180,761 $ 450,779 $ 2,381,648 $ 94,588 $ - $ 2,927,015 $ 2,927,015 $ 7,228,209 40.5% $ - $ -
960 Saegert Transportation 1975 10.6 $ 128,439 $ 185,122 $ 313,561 $ 1,456,374 $ 172,306 $ 28,659 $ 1,970,900 $ 1,942,241 $ 7,983,889 24.3% $ - $ -
962 Service Center - Building & Grounds 1991 16.7 $ 170,528 $ 209,015 $ 379,543 $ 1,102,379 $ 44,245 $ 135,726 $ 1,661,892 $ 1,526,167 $ 15,239,037 10.0% $ - $ 15,999
Total $ 77,451,146 $ 242,076,008 $ 319,527,153 0 $ 522,702,751 $ 88,789,541 $ 144,246,781 $ 1,075,266,227 0 $ 938,928,480 $ 4,112,139,818 22.8% $ 130,776,864 $ 184,824,729

Page 200
EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT


District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix B
Facility Capacity Charts and
Population Updates

Page 201
AISD Permanent Capacity EXHIBIT "B"

Cafeteria = 4,200 SF / 880 Students Gym = 3,000 SF / 880 Students Library = 3,500 SF / 880 Students
Classroom Capacity 4.77 SF per Student 3.41 SF per Student 3.98 SF per Student
Average
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 4.77 SF per based on Café / Gym Area 3.41 SF per based on Gym / Library 3.98 SF per based on Library /
LOC Elementary Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
142 Allan 673 379 56% 357 53% 42 6 22 85% 673 5,483 4.77 1,149 171% 6,160 3.41 1,806 268% 6,704 3.98 1,685 250%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 536 110% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,513 4.77 736 151% 2,972 3.41 871 179% 3,636 3.98 914 188%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 604 124% 31 5 22 85% 486 3,361 4.77 705 145% 3,192 3.41 936 192% 2,217 3.98 557 115%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 488 73% 38 6 22 95% 669 4,507 4.77 945 141% 3,183 3.41 933 140% 3,598 3.98 904 135%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 881 111% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,845 4.77 806 102% 2,878 3.41 844 106% 2,850 3.98 716 90%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 909 163% 41 6 22 85% 655 2,574 4.77 540 82% 2,558 3.41 750 115% 2,642 3.98 664 101%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 184 73% 14 2 22 95% 251 2,707 4.77 567 226% 2,329 3.41 683 272% 2,834 3.98 712 284%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 214 41% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,337 4.77 700 134% 3,403 3.41 998 191% 2,116 3.98 532 102%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 255 43% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,117 4.77 653 109% 3,054 3.41 896 150% 2,246 3.98 564 94%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 667 105% 40 6 22 85% 636 3,052 4.77 640 101% 2,531 3.41 742 117% 2,723 3.98 684 108%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 827 138% 38 6 22 85% 598 5,258 4.77 1,102 184% 3,203 3.41 939 157% 3,480 3.98 874 146%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 496 66% 42 6 22 95% 752 4,052 4.77 850 113% 2,887 3.41 847 113% 3,384 3.98 850 113%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 419 72% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,468 4.77 517 88% 2,447 3.41 718 123% 3,078 3.98 773 132%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 449 104% 27 4 22 85% 430 2,363 4.77 495 115% 2,328 3.41 683 159% 2,743 3.98 689 160%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 480 103% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,944 4.77 827 177% 2,426 3.41 712 152% 3,139 3.98 789 169%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 283 104% 16 3 22 95% 272 2,296 4.77 481 177% 2,987 3.41 876 322% 2,307 3.98 580 213%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 377 72% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,129 4.77 866 165% 3,030 3.41 889 170% 2,777 3.98 698 133%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 652 92% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,425 4.77 928 131% 3,055 3.41 896 126% 2,757 3.98 693 97%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 729 109% 38 6 22 95% 669 3,962 4.77 831 124% 2,588 3.41 759 113% 3,736 3.98 939 140%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 734 88% 47 7 22 95% 836 4,282 4.77 898 107% 3,025 3.41 887 106% 3,576 3.98 898 107%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,173 209% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,242 4.77 680 121% 2,365 3.41 694 124% 3,375 3.98 848 151%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 678 101% 37 5 22 95% 669 4,060 4.77 851 127% 2,985 3.41 875 131% 2,968 3.98 746 111%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 632 101% 35 5 22 95% 627 3,363 4.77 705 112% 2,518 3.41 738 118% 3,091 3.98 777 124%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 675 92% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,995 4.77 837 114% 3,047 3.41 894 122% 2,848 3.98 716 98%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 279 55% 32 5 22 85% 505 2,470 4.77 518 103% 2,338 3.41 686 136% 2,121 3.98 533 106%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 679 125% 30 4 22 95% 543 4,623 4.77 969 178% 3,027 3.41 888 163% 2,925 3.98 735 135%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 715 101% 44 6 22 85% 711 4,287 4.77 899 126% 3,041 3.41 892 125% 3,545 3.98 891 125%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 450 75% 37 5 22 85% 598 3,570 4.77 749 125% 2,301 3.41 675 113% 2,225 3.98 559 93%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 759 127% 38 6 22 85% 598 4,280 4.77 897 150% 3,217 3.41 943 158% 3,068 3.98 771 129%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 340 81% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,195 4.77 460 110% 2,401 3.41 704 168% 2,434 3.98 612 146%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 793 146% 34 5 22 85% 542 3,408 4.77 714 132% 2,267 3.41 665 123% 2,594 3.98 652 120%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 865 122% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,667 4.77 769 108% 3,040 3.41 892 125% 2,848 3.98 716 101%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 567 97% 33 5 22 95% 585 2,469 4.77 518 88% 2,514 3.41 737 126% 1,951 3.98 490 84%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 677 108% 35 5 22 95% 627 2,723 4.77 571 91% 2,456 3.41 720 115% 3,357 3.98 844 135%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 911 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 4,951 4.77 1,038 150% 3,483 3.41 1,021 148% 3,645 3.98 916 132%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 672 103% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,159 4.77 872 133% 2,997 3.41 879 134% 2,807 3.98 705 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 314 84% 24 4 22 85% 374 3,595 4.77 754 202% 2,375 3.41 696 186% 2,080 3.98 523 140%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 866 115% 42 6 22 95% 752 3,779 4.77 792 105% 3,211 3.41 942 125% 2,782 3.98 699 93%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 676 100% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,292 4.77 900 134% 2,962 3.41 869 129% 3,561 3.98 895 133%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 914 132% 43 6 22 85% 692 2,881 4.77 604 87% 2,579 3.41 756 109% 2,519 3.98 633 91%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 293 70% 24 4 22 95% 418 2,059 4.77 432 103% 2,238 3.41 656 157% 2,647 3.98 665 159%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 906 167% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,738 4.77 574 106% 2,507 3.41 735 136% 2,322 3.98 584 108%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 302 85% 20 3 22 95% 355 2,470 4.77 518 146% 2,447 3.41 718 202% 1,941 3.98 488 137%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 299 75% 23 4 22 95% 397 1,906 4.77 400 101% 2,377 3.41 697 176% 2,278 3.98 572 144%
165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,026 177% 36 5 22 85% 580 5,127 4.77 1,075 185% 3,045 3.41 893 154% 2,852 3.98 717 124%
147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 702 116% 34 5 22 95% 606 3,572 4.77 749 124% 2,501 3.41 734 121% 2,442 3.98 614 101%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 481 89% 34 5 22 85% 542 4,045 4.77 848 156% 3,013 3.41 884 163% 2,816 3.98 708 130%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 860 108% 44 6 22 95% 794 3,759 4.77 788 99% 3,052 3.41 895 113% 2,747 3.98 690 87%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 380 78% 30 4 22 85% 486 2,876 4.77 603 124% 2,259 3.41 662 136% 2,647 3.98 665 137%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 783 101% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,567 4.77 957 124% 3,393 3.41 995 129% 3,330 3.98 837 108%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 336 82% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,086 4.77 437 106% 2,985 3.41 875 213% 2,130 3.98 535 130%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 740 136% 34 5 22 85% 542 2,643 4.77 554 102% 2,421 3.41 710 131% 2,877 3.98 723 133%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 263 70% 24 4 22 85% 374 2,734 4.77 573 153% 2,323 3.41 681 182% 1,468 3.98 369 99%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 904 146% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,148 4.77 870 141% 7,853 3.41 2,303 373% 3,560 3.98 894 145%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 687 102% 42 6 22 85% 673 4,189 4.77 878 130% 3,075 3.41 902 134% 3,757 3.98 944 140%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 894 116% 43 6 22 95% 773 4,849 4.77 1,017 131% 3,067 3.41 899 116% 3,542 3.98 890 115%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0% 17 3 22 95% 293 1,307 4.77 274 94% 2,995 3.41 878 300% 1,468 3.98 369 126%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 520 107% 30 4 22 85% 486 3,220 4.77 675 139% 2,412 3.41 707 146% 2,986 3.98 750 154%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 864 144% 37 5 22 85% 598 4,158 4.77 872 146% 3,295 3.41 966 161% 3,467 3.98 871 146%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 618 100% 39 6 22 85% 617 4,363 4.77 915 148% 9,153 3.41 2,684 435% 2,882 3.98 724 117%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 617 118% 29 4 22 95% 522 2,761 4.77 579 111% 3,069 3.41 900 172% 2,282 3.98 573 110%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 662 126% 33 5 22 85% 524 3,991 4.77 837 160% 3,022 3.41 886 169% 3,546 3.98 891 170%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0% 23 - 18 95% 393 2,982 4.77 625 159% NA 3.41 NA NA 2,148 3.98 540 137%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 342 108% 20 3 22 85% 318 2,287 4.77 479 151% 2,398 3.41 703 221% 1,637 3.98 411 129%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 123 60% 13 2 22 85% 206 2,309 4.77 484 235% 2,336 3.41 685 333% 1,762 3.98 443 215%

11/11/2010 Page 202


AISD Permanent Capacity EXHIBIT "B"

174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,044 147% 44 6 22 85% 711 3,714 4.77 779 110% 3,056 3.41 896 126% 2,818 3.98 708 100%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 564 97% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,959 4.77 620 107% 2,399 3.41 704 121% 3,028 3.98 761 131%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 366 103% 22 3 22 85% 355 2,599 4.77 545 153% 2,484 3.41 728 205% 2,625 3.98 660 186%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 407 99% 26 4 22 85% 411 2,825 4.77 592 144% 2,259 3.41 662 161% 3,149 3.98 791 192%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 572 78% 41 6 22 95% 731 3,683 4.77 772 106% 3,064 3.41 898 123% 4,017 3.98 1,009 138%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 494 88% 35 5 22 85% 561 2,987 4.77 626 112% 2,376 3.41 697 124% 2,952 3.98 742 132%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 556 114% 31 5 22 85% 486 2,992 4.77 627 129% 2,812 3.41 825 170% 1,962 3.98 493 101%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 918 140% 41 6 22 85% 655 4,721 4.77 990 151% 2,638 3.41 773 118% 3,706 3.98 931 142%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 834 124% 42 6 22 85% 673 3,851 4.77 807 120% 3,051 3.41 895 133% 3,363 3.98 845 126%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 728 130% 35 5 22 85% 561 3,040 4.77 637 114% 2,500 3.41 733 131% 2,923 3.98 734 131%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 601 115% 33 5 22 85% 524 2,565 4.77 538 103% 2,322 3.41 681 130% 2,348 3.98 590 113%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,096 209% 33 5 22 85% 524 4,120 4.77 864 165% 2,580 3.41 757 145% 2,319 3.98 583 111%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 740 158% 29 4 22 85% 468 3,534 4.77 741 158% 2,534 3.41 743 159% 3,036 3.98 763 163%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 339 58% 36 5 22 85% 580 2,618 4.77 549 95% 2,740 3.41 804 139% 2,714 3.98 682 118%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 329 72% 26 4 22 95% 460 2,894 4.77 607 132% 2,217 3.41 650 141% 2,703 3.98 679 148%
44,905 48,738 47,366

Cafeteria = 4,500 SF / 1,100 Students Gym = 13,400 SF / 1,100 Students Library = 4,800 SF / 1,100 Students
Classroom Capacity 4.10 SF per Student 12.18 SF per Student 4.36 SF per Student
Average
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity 12.18 SF Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 4.10 SF per based on Café / Gym Area per based on Gym / Library 4.36 SF per based on Library /
LOC Middle Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 997 85% 56 0 28 75% 1,176 4,752 4.10 1,159 99% 13,668 12.18 1,122 95% 4,013 4.36 920 78%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,171 124% 48 0 28 70% 941 6,348 4.10 1,548 165% 11,555 12.18 949 101% 3,657 4.36 839 89%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,163 112% 53 0 28 70% 1,039 5,765 4.10 1,406 135% 11,877 12.18 975 94% 3,243 4.36 744 72%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 922 82% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,461 4.10 1,088 82% 13,935 12.18 1,144 86% 4,044 4.36 928 70%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 709 79% 46 0 28 70% 902 4,790 4.10 1,168 130% 11,388 12.18 935 104% 3,553 4.36 815 90%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 898 83% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,452 4.10 1,330 123% 13,196 12.18 1,083 101% 4,127 4.36 947 88%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 801 66% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 5,220 4.10 1,273 105% 15,986 12.18 1,312 108% 4,666 4.36 1,070 88%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 943 71% 63 0 28 75% 1,323 4,669 4.10 1,139 86% 15,396 12.18 1,264 96% 5,616 4.36 1,288 97%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 563 42% 80 0 28 70% 1,568 4,433 4.10 1,081 69% 12,344 12.18 1,013 65% 4,499 4.36 1,032 66%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 554 55% 48 0 28 75% 1,008 6,725 4.10 1,640 163% 10,575 12.18 868 86% 3,665 4.36 841 83%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,070 133% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,022 4.10 981 122% 11,740 12.18 964 120% 2,983 4.36 684 85%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,224 101% 62 0 28 70% 1,215 4,501 4.10 1,098 90% 13,699 12.18 1,125 93% 4,044 4.36 928 76%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,187 107% 53 0 28 75% 1,113 4,879 4.10 1,190 107% 11,857 12.18 974 87% 3,413 4.36 783 70%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 764 81% 45 0 28 75% 945 5,199 4.10 1,268 134% 10,628 12.18 873 92% 3,147 4.36 722 76%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,123 97% 59 0 28 70% 1,156 5,953 4.10 1,452 126% 12,775 12.18 1,049 91% 2,798 4.36 642 55%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 683 63% 55 0 28 70% 1,078 5,057 4.10 1,234 114% 13,147 12.18 1,079 100% 4,293 4.36 985 91%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0% 44 0 28 75% 924 5,272 4.10 1,286 139% 11,751 12.18 965 104% 5,046 4.36 1,157 125%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 873 70% 59 0 28 75% 1,239 6,244 4.10 1,523 123% 13,899 12.18 1,141 92% 3,142 4.36 721 58%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 692 86% 41 0 28 70% 804 4,348 4.10 1,061 132% 12,023 12.18 987 123% 4,399 4.36 1,009 126%
20,417 16,154 16,337

Cafeteria = 9,000 SF / 2,400 Students Gym = 20,720 SF / 2,400 Students Library = 8,400 SF / 2,400 Students
Classroom Capacity 3.75 SF per Student 8.63 SF per Student 3.50 SF per Student
Average School School School
% of Perm. % of Perm. Special Students Capacity Capacity Capacity
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2009-10 Capacity Classroom Rooms per Efficiency Classroom Café Area 3.75 SF per based on Café / Gym Area 8.63 SF per based on Gym / Library 3.50 SF per based on Library /
LOC High Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop. Count (ES Only) Classroom Factor Capacity (SF) student Café Size Classroom (SF) student Gym Size Classroom Area (SF) student Library Size Classroom
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,076 128% 114 0 28 75% 2,394 10,935 3.75 2,916 122% 21,471 8.63 2,488 104% 8,371 3.50 2,392 100%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,912 95% 113 0 28 75% 2,373 8,178 3.75 2,181 92% 17,068 8.63 1,978 83% 9,864 3.50 2,818 119%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,964 89% 105 0 28 75% 2,205 10,074 3.75 2,686 122% 17,488 8.63 2,026 92% 5,977 3.50 1,708 77%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,594 102% 142 0 28 75% 2,982 9,200 3.75 2,453 82% 22,036 8.63 2,553 86% 9,862 3.50 2,818 94%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,927 89% 103 0 28 75% 2,163 8,955 3.75 2,388 110% 17,050 8.63 1,976 91% 7,671 3.50 2,192 101%
EMHSJC /
19/20/29 International 1,548 894 58% 1,310 85% 79 0 28 70% 1,548 8,952 3.75 2,387 154% 16,419 8.63 1,903 123% 6,106 3.50 1,745 113%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0% 18 0 28 75% 378 1,834 3.75 489 129% 2,282 8.63 264 70% 1,223 3.50 349 92%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 2,037 125% 83 0 28 70% 1,627 13,513 3.75 3,603 221% 23,465 8.63 2,719 167% 7,677 3.50 2,194 135%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,110 60% 94 0 28 70% 1,842 8,026 3.75 2,140 116% 18,936 8.63 2,194 119% 8,856 3.50 2,530 137%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,343 84% 76 0 28 75% 1,596 6,244 3.75 1,665 104% 15,765 8.63 1,827 114% 6,981 3.50 1,994 125%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,597 101% 81 0 28 70% 1,588 8,600 3.75 2,293 144% 22,180 8.63 2,570 162% 6,226 3.50 1,779 112%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,994 107% 95 0 28 70% 1,862 9,462 3.75 2,523 136% 14,870 8.63 1,723 93% 7,017 3.50 2,005 108%
21,698 20,512 20,864

11/11/2010 Page 203


2010 Population Update EXHIBIT "B"

% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC Elementary Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
142 Allan 673 379 56% 354 53%
101 Allison 486 543 112% 585 120%
102 Andrews 486 717 147% 692 142%
187 Baldwin 669 508 76% 557 83%
182 Baranoff 794 876 110% 891 112%
149 Barrington 556 996 179% 955 172%
103 Barton Hills 251 386 154% 203 81%
104 Becker 524 208 40% 226 43%
105 Blackshear 598 244 41% 288 48%
106 Blanton 636 591 93% 630 99%
185 Blazier 598 775 130% 896 150%
170 Boone 752 501 67% 478 64%
107 Brentwood 585 495 85% 456 78%
108 Brooke 430 439 102% 441 103%
109 Brown 468 519 111% 525 112%
110 Bryker Woods 272 404 149% 312 115%
111 Campbell 524 360 69% 367 70%
173 Casey 711 669 94% 763 107%
112 Casis 669 825 123% 731 109%
184 Clayton 836 867 104% 837 100%
161 Cook 561 901 161% 1,252 223%
183 Cowan 669 783 117% 707 106%
113 Cunningham 627 512 82% 573 91%
179 Davis 731 683 93% 666 91%
114 Dawson 505 331 66% 276 55%
154 Doss 543 768 141% 728 134%
176 Galindo 711 704 99% 689 97%
116 Govalle 598 415 69% 452 76%
159 Graham 598 761 127% 825 138%
117 Gullett 418 541 129% 325 78%
118 Harris 542 758 140% 755 139%
163 Hart 711 898 126% 888 125%
119 Highland Park 585 662 113% 599 102%
155 Hill 627 732 117% 714 114%
162 Houston 692 915 132% 897 130%
178 Jordan 655 833 127% 706 108%
120 Joslin 374 363 97% 329 88%
180 Kiker 752 933 124% 883 117%
172 Kocurek 673 660 98% 687 102%
168 Langford 692 834 121% 895 129%
121 Lee 418 428 102% 308 74%
160 Linder 542 892 164% 956 176%
122 Maplewood 355 406 114% 300 84%
123 Mathews 397 405 102% 284 72%

01/26/2011 Page 204


2010 Population Update EXHIBIT "B"

165 McBee 580 765 132% 1,031 178%


147 Menchaca 606 686 113% 685 113%
124 Metz 542 498 92% 477 88%
181 Mills 794 928 117% 831 105%
150 Norman 486 333 68% 376 77%
148 Oak Hill 773 772 100% 820 106%
125 Oak Springs 411 274 67% 293 71%
156 Odom 542 658 121% 706 130%
126 Ortega 374 296 79% 266 71%
189 Overton 617 668 108% 948 154%
171 Palm 673 606 90% 637 95%
143 Patton 773 914 118% 908 117%
128 Pease 293 256 87% 0 0%
129 Pecan Springs 486 532 109% 490 101%
190 Perez 598 886 148% 945 158%
164 Pickle 617 740 120% 737 119%
151 Pillow 522 653 125% 651 125%
130 Pleasant Hill 524 619 118% 631 121%
131 Read Pre-K 393 509 129% 0 0%
132 Reilly 318 296 93% 357 112%
133 Ridgetop 206 219 106% 128 62%
174 Rodriguez 711 910 128% 1,045 147%
127 Sanchez 580 585 101% 584 101%
139 Sims 355 277 78% 343 97%
136 St. Elmo 411 304 74% 369 90%
138 Summitt 731 854 117% 623 85%
158 Sunset Valley 561 451 80% 483 86%
140 Travis Heights 486 537 110% 548 113%
141 Walnut Creek 655 916 140% 936 143%
175 Widen 673 769 114% 794 118%
166 Williams 561 642 114% 640 114%
157 Winn 524 463 88% 485 93%
152 Wooldridge 524 878 168% 1,160 222%
144 Wooten 468 695 149% 672 144%
145 Zavala 580 407 70% 347 60%
146 Zilker 460 522 114% 338 74%
44,905 48,738 48,165

01/26/2011 Page 205


2010 Population Update EXHIBIT "B"

% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC Middle Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
59 Bailey 1,176 1,041 89% 979 83%
54 Bedichek 941 1,054 112% 1,219 130%
46 Burnet 1,039 998 96% 1,170 113%
57 Covington 1,125 805 72% 905 80%
55 Dobie 902 630 70% 719 80%
43 Fulmore 1,078 995 92% 850 79%
56 Garcia 1,215 658 54% 829 68%
62 Gorzycki 1,323 963 73% 989 75%
44 Kealing 1,333 1,233 93% 541 41%
45 Lamar 1,008 604 60% 583 58%
51 Martin 804 639 80% 1,056 131%
58 Mendez 1,215 890 73% 1,266 104%
52 Murchison 1,113 1,281 115% 1,171 105%
47 O. Henry 945 1,026 109% 804 85%
61 Paredes 1,156 930 80% 1,165 101%
48 Pearce 1,078 329 31% 712 66%
28 Richards YWL 924 528 57% 0 0%
60 Small 1,239 959 77% 876 71%
53 Webb 804 591 74% 731 91%
20,417 16,154 16,565

% of Perm. % of Perm.
Permanent 2010 Capacity 2010-11 Capacity
LOC High Capacity Enrollment by Enroll. Population by Pop.
17 Akins 2,394 2,720 114% 3,092 129%
9 Anderson 2,017 2,089 104% 1,962 97%
2 Austin 2,205 2,337 106% 1,958 89%
13 Bowie 2,535 2,876 113% 2,606 103%
8 Crockett 2,163 1,686 78% 1,883 87%
EMHSJC /
19/20/29 International 1,548 894 58% 1,249 81%
15 Garza 321 260 81% 0 0%
4 Lanier 1,627 1,624 100% 1,981 122%
14/18 LBJ / LASA 1,842 1,881 102% 1,083 59%
5 McCallum 1,596 1,824 114% 1,316 82%
6 Reagan 1,588 901 57% 1,552 98%
7 Travis 1,862 1,420 76% 1,902 102%
21,698 20,512 20,584

01/26/2011 Page 206


EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT


District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix C
Visioning Workshop Summary

Page 207
EXHIBIT "B"

May 13 & 14, 2010

AUSTIN ISD
Facility Master Plan
Visioning Workshop

Page 208
EXHIBIT "B"

Acknowledgements
Cuningham Group Architecture P.A., as a consultant to DeJONG-RICHTER, prepared this document with
the support and assistance of the following Facility Master Plan Vision Workshop participants:

John Alawneh AISD - Technology


Tony Arnold City of Austin – Parks & Recreation
John Blazier Business Partner
Kathrin Brewer Austin Partners in Education
Bill Caritij AISD - Chief Accountability
Meria Carstarphen AISD - Superintendent
Nan Clayton Former AISD Board Member
Ariel Cloud AISD – Asst. Superintendent Elementary
Nicole Conley-Abram AISD - CFO
Tommy Cowan Business Partner
Paul Cruz Chief of Schools
Ashton Cumberbatch Community Seton Hospital
Elizabeth Dickey AISD Special Education
Bill De Dufour AISD - Technology
Richard Frazier AISD – Teacher / Task Force Chair
Janna Griffin Asst. Supt. Office - Elementary
Janis Guerrero AISD – Community Relations
Bergeron Harris AISD – Asst. Supt. Middle Schools
Janna Lilly AISD – Special Education
Viviana Lopez AISD – Curriculum/Special Projects
Eliza May Community
Janet Mitchell Community – Task Force Chair
Chris Moore City of Austin – Child Safety
Jaqui Porter Early Childhood
Geronimo Rodriguez Community – Seton Hospital
Curt Shaw Director of Construction Management
Karen Sperry AISD – Chief of Staff
Paul Turner AISD – Executive Director of Facilities
Gloria Williams AISD – Community Education
Cora Wright City of Austin – Parks & Recreation

Other Participants
Pat Rossett AISD – Assistant Director Bond Services
Carolyn Staskiewicz DeJONG-RICHTER
Eric Sheppard Magellan Inc
Steven Kapeller BLGY Architecture
Benny Hawkins BLGY Architecture
Meg Parsons Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.
Tim Dufault Cuningham Group Architecture, P.A.

Page 209
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Table of Contents

Introduction

Day One
A. Greatest Hopes
B. Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson
C. Issues & Assets
D. Provocation II: School of One
E. I See…We See…
F. Facility Master Plan Vision Statement
G. Provocation III: Environment Matters
H. Values: AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015 Review
I. Story Time

Day Two
A. Reflections
B. Provocation III: John A. Johnson
C. Facility Principles

Appendices
A. Day One Presentation
B. Day Two Presentation
C. Final Presentation
D. Photos

Page 210
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Introduction
This document is the result of a Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop held May 13th & 14th, 2010 with
participants from the Austin Independent School District and the community. The purpose of this workshop
was to create a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement and Facility Principles.

The purpose of a Facility Master Plan is to create a clear and compelling vision of the future for AISD,
aligning facilities with learning. A Facility Master Plan Vision Statement creates a filter by which future
decisions can be made and Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s important for all
schools in AISD.

The process used during the Visioning Workshop was interactive and included “Provocations” and small
and whole group work. The following is a summary of our work during both days.

Page 211
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Greatest Hopes:
Day one started with participants sharing their Greatest Hopes for the Facility Master Planning process.
Below are some of the hopes shared by participants:

Page 212
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Provocation I: Sir Ken Robinson: Do Schools Kill Creativity?


http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html

Reactions to the video included the following:


 Learning occurs in many ways – public education focuses on academic achievement
 Career/Vocational Education is not emphasized but some children want – we need to provide the right
programs for all children
 The system is structurally set up to fail some children – there are ethnocentric, gender, and cultural
differences we need to consider
 Everyone learns differently
 Focus on where students can be successful through application
 Plan for the future but not at the expense of today
 There is a knowing/doing gap in education – establish the courage to do what we know is right – “thou shalt”
…accountability
 We continue to build boxes for people to teach in that look the same – we need more flexible, collaborative
spaces
 We need to respond to changes in the world; we need to be agile and our environment affects us
 The challenge is that we have given critical responsibility to one group of adults: teachers; we need to
consider the role of parents and the community to create creative thinkers. Open possibilities for kids to
learn from and in whole world – engage the community

Page 213
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Issues & Assets


We discussed and prioritized Issues and Assets in Austin ISD. This was a way to find out what was
important to those present and what they thought were key to the success of a Facilities Master Plan. As is
noted below on the sheets the key issues identified were:
 Equity of facilities and resources across the district
 Efficient use of resources throughout the community
 Partnering
 Future flexibility for teaching in the future
 Competition and school choices (Middle class participates in public schools but they have other
choices)
 School boundaries

Page 214
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Provocation II: School of One


http://schools.nyc.gov/community/innovation/SchoolofOne/default.htm

The group watched a video on the School of One, a program that started the summer of 2009, in New York
City.

From the above website:

“The mission of School of One is to provide students with personalized, effective, and dynamic classroom
instruction so that teachers have more time to focus on the quality of their instruction.
To achieve this mission, School of One re-imagines the traditional classroom model. Instead of one teacher
and 25-30 students in a classroom, each student participates in multiple instructional modalities, including a
combination of teacher-led instruction, one-on-one tutoring, independent learning, and work with virtual
tutors.

To organize this type of learning, each student receives a unique daily schedule based on his or her
academic strengths and needs. As a result, students within the same school or even the same classroom
can receive profoundly different instruction as each student‟s schedule is tailored to the skills they need and
the ways they best learn. Teachers acquire data about student achievement each day and then adapt their
live instructional lessons accordingly

By leveraging technology to play a more essential role in planning instruction, teachers have more time to
focus on doing what they do best - delivering quality instruction and ensuring that all students learn.”

Page 215
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Activity I: I See…We See…


“Vision is the art of seeing the invisible” Jonathan Swift

To start the visioning process we asked participants to „imagine it‟s 10 years out, the AISD Facility Master
Plan has given the district amazing learning places that reflect the community and help the district
accomplish its mission. People visit because its facilities are so successful in accomplishing the goals of
the District. Imagine you‟re giving someone a tour – what do you see?‟

Individually participants created I See statements:


 One-on-one time with teachers
 Entire staff focused and engaged with kids
 Teachers focused on teaching the kids and not other issues
 Schools are the pride of the community and the first choice of middle class families
 Large yet flexible spaces built to fit our growing population
 Repurposed spaces that are vintage yet functional for the community
 All facilities are beautifully maintained and are supportive of the instructional programs
 All schools are painted in bright colors – place of exciting learning
 A dramatically reduced number of schools, yet a mix of small, medium, and large facilities
 50 years later the space is still current (or can be)
 Public and private, city and school district co-location of offices, classrooms, theaters, and meeting areas
 Art facilities which involve all our students and the world class Austin arts community in a learning partnership
 Shared facilities with the city Zachary Scott Theater, Long Center, AT&T, IBM, CAN. ACC – classroom days around
and within the city
 Students integrated within the community, downtown, capitol, tech companies, Whole Foods; “what do you do days”
 Students a large part of the day as interns and apprentices
 Schools have clear feeder patterns and each feeder pattern has a special focus
 Engaged, enthusiastic students that want to be there. Eager to explain their love for learning.
 Loud sounds from playing and team problems solving
 Quiet places for reading and silent learning contemplation
 Team sports, yoga, and meditation
 Wall-sized white boards for drawing ideas and solutions (graffiti on buildings)
 Integrated learning (curriculum) across multiple learning environments
 Teachers focused on each child‟s learning style and developing and delivering in small groups to that style on a
fundamental goal
 Subjects based on student career goals
 Teams of students involved in projects using technology
 Students in a variety of “work spaces “ to complete team projects
 Teachers facilitating the learning for students with technology as a major focus
 Fifteen-to eighteen-hour campuses that engage all ages of the community from senior populations to immigrant
populations teaching each other, weekend festivals, performing arts with the community
 Partnerships with the community, government and schools to achieve educational goals
 Schools that are useable by the community – computers, gymnasiums, weight room
 Teachers adept at teaching with technology, smart boards that are interactive, advanced projection systems with
students to share their work
 Computer-directed programs that include collaboration and relationships
 Furniture that is moveable and easily configured to adapt to a lesson
 Wall space for student work display
 Work space for problem solving – environmental issues
 Students interacting with each other and the instructor in a well lit, clean, environmentally comfortable space
 Recreational and athletic facilities that are available in all communities resulting from partnerships with public and
private entities that support youth and adult education

Page 216
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

 Schools that welcome visitors and are responsive to visitors


 Classrooms that are interactive include technology but also instructionally interactive – kids engaged with each other
and teacher
 All students have internet access at home
 Staff, students and parents can readily access results and academic plans
 Students have exactly the information they need in the best format
 Realization of the promise of “instructional TV” to help teachers with complex, real world concepts such velocity,
acceleration, gravity, history of Middle Eastern areas, areas on curves, environmental science, poetry etc…
 Virtual lab for HS students to work on course credits. Teachers as side facilitators.
 As I walk through the facility I see a number of distant learning centers where students and teachers participating in a
collaborative learning process. These rooms have state of the art technology.
 State of the art facilities on each campus and two district-wide performing art centers
 Students attend neighborhood schools as best opportunity
 Classroom instruction that accommodates different student learning styles and provides support and enrichment based
on student learning needs
 Stimulating and inviting learning environments that are fun to be in
 Inviting/welcoming face to the facility
 Parents working with students throughout the school
 Spaces for collaboration between teachers, parents and students
 Parents present, actively engaged, knowing learning goals of students
 Space for community/parents to be engaged
 Outside area is an extension of the learning environment
 Students learning in flexible indoor and outdoor spaces
 Gardens, fountains and trails instead of carpet and grass
 Active learning
 Classrooms that make use of indoor and outdoor settings for learning
 Students moving and active in the learning process
 Students actively engaged in their learning
 Classrooms which comfortably hold 30 students in a variety of ways
 Students working in small groups collaboratively
 I see building design geared towards multi-sensory student engagement
 A clean, well maintained visually appealing school for every student
 Tables instead of desks
 Classrooms are organized into learning centers
 Apprenticeships for vocational education
 Learners engaged in community activities and project learning
 Government classes sponsor a bill/resolution at the capital
 Spaces for volunteers from collaborative agencies
 Libraries that allow students to access the world beyond their classroom
 Community of instructors…local, expert, university, etc…
 Space for group performances in every school
 Culturally relevant artwork and displays
 Technology is natural (organic part of the learning process
 Facilities and technology and resources accessible for all
 Classrooms where students have access to technology and its use is integrated into all areas
 Students skilled at technology for gaining, sharing, linking, creating information
 Multiple technology resources in every classroom
 Science and math labs which allow for technology and hands on activities
 I Pad technology instead of paper
 Learning spaces for teachers and administrators
 Adequate work space for all staff
 Multi use meeting spaces
 Less office space – more multi-purpose spaces
 All space is special education space based on IEP (Individual Education Plan) for every child

Page 217
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

 Social skills training as part the degree program (such as mediation training)
 Flex schedules for students in high school
 Young children given the time and opportunity to learn through play
 Access to all resources within a school for every student
 Curriculum that is differentiated to fit individuals needs and flexible schedules to allow the best use of time
 Secondary classrooms that allow for small group work (not just rows of chairs)
 A flower bed at the entrance of school, there are trees that have been pruned, and doors have been painted recently
and rooms are brightly painted, there are posters on the walls along with student work. The facilities reflect attention to
detail
 As we enter the library, there is a bank of computers and students working in small groups accessing databases from
around the world. The students are engaged and the noise level is amazingly semi quiet.
 Technology driven learning in every classroom in AISD facility
 Language development academy, producing fluent 2nd and 3rd language proficiency
 Fine arts integrated with academics integrated with social learning
 Music academy generating music professionals, singers, etc.
 Spaces that are student/teacher friendly
 Teachers interacting with students
 Community advocate centers/service for students and family members
 Learning centers for 0 to 4-year olds
 All students actively involved in learning
 Collaboration between AISD and ACC that produces HS graduates interested in graduation with certificates in medical
technology, nursing, construction, etc…
 Central headquarters reduced in physical size, in more compact, effective structure
 Substantial revenue generated from space use that can be reinvested into important programming
 Private and corporate donation to AISD foundation in excess of $50 million
 Number-one rated HS in the country in Austin due to technology or live music/jazz, band or other with an awesome
facility/stages, media rooms, etc…

I See Wordle
www.wordle.net

Wordle is a program that


generates “word clouds”
from text. The clouds give
greater prominence to
words that appear more
frequently in the source
text. The Wordle to the left
was generated from all the
I See statements
contributed by participants

Page 218
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

In small groups participants then shared these I See… statements and created We See… statements.
Listed below are the We see… statements worked on by participants in small groups. These became the
basis of the Vision Statement.

We see…..
 An overall environment that is both encouraging and engaging
 Purposeful, functional, modular facilities that serve all students needs
 Facilities “co-purposed” for student and community usage
 Teachers totally focused on education and innovation

Students in a variety of learning environments with technology support, integrated to ensure development
of individual learning styles and goals, supported by community partnerships on an ongoing basis (24/7)

Facilities that are inviting, welcoming, flexible enough to accommodate and support a variety of instructional
arrangements and incorporates:
 instructional technology
 family and community access to information
 teacher access to information and resources

 Facilities with dedicated spaces to foster and engage parents/community


 Facilities that use the outdoors and indoors in ways that are environmentally responsible and
allows for learning to take place in a variety of ways
 Facilities that engage with the community to provide extended learning opportunities both within
the school walls and beyond
 Classrooms large enough to allow for flex grouping and active hands-on learning
 A variety of multi-use areas
 Facilities where technology is integrated in every space and accessible to all students and staff
 Spaces that allow for differentiated instruction and flexible school day

Environment: small group instruction spaces, flower beds, natural light, storage areas and no portable
buildings (beautiful physical space high quality learning is norm)

Special Programs: Single gender/ single-grade academies, partnerships with higher learning for
career/vocational skill development, family resource centers, fine arts, language academies and early
childhood centers

Technology: Virtual/distance learning, IPad/electronic text-books

Central Office: More compact space

Revenue: Space used (for partnerships, co-locations in underutilized space) Private and corporate gifts –
Austin-based celebrities

Page 219
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 220
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Master Plan Vision Statement


The purpose of a vision statement is to guide the entire process, help set priorities, align resources against
priorities and facilitate an efficient decision making process. The following vision statement was created by
participants from the work done together:

All AISD schools inspire high student achievement and common


community goals through inviting, accessible, and efficient facilities that
integrate technology and sustainability.

Revised Version:

All AISD schools will inspire high student achievement


and support common community goals through equitable,
inviting facilities that integrate technology and are
optimally used, accessible, sustainable, and meet highest
educational adequacy standards.

Page 221
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Provocation III: Environment Matters


“The only true voyage of discovery consists not of visiting new places, but seeing with new eyes.”
Voltaire

As a part of the process of thinking about the future of Austin schools, the group looked at learning styles,
the learning environment and current examples of what other districts are doing with their facilities. Below
are examples of what was discussed. The presentation is included in the May 13th presentation in the
appendix of this document.

14

Page 222
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Values
Building on the work that has already been done in the District we reviewed the Austin ISD Strategic Plan
and expanded on the Values contained in the Plan:

AISD Strategic Plan 2010-2015:

Mission (What We Do)


In partnership with parents and our community, AISD exists to provide a comprehensive educational
experience that is high quality, challenging, and inspires all students to make a positive contribution to
society.

Vision (Where We Want to Be)


AISD will be nationally recognized as an outstanding school district, instilling a passion for life-long learning
in all students.

Goals (What We Want to Accomplish)


 Goal 1: All students will perform at or above grade level.
 Goal 2: Achievement gaps among all student groups will be eliminated.
 Goal 3: All students will graduate ready for college, career, and life in a globally competitive economy.
 Goal 4: All schools will meet or exceed state accouintability standards, and the district will meet federal
standards and exceed state standards.

Strategies (How We Will Achieve Our Goals)


 Provide a high-quality, well-rounded educational experience to all students that is rigorous, culturally
relevant, healthful, and engaging.
 Build strong relationships with students, families, and the community to increase trust and shared
responsibility.
 Ensure that every classroom has a high-quality, effective educator, supported by high-quality, effective
administrators and support staff.
 Align resources to accomplish priorities within a balanced budget.

Values (What We Believe In)


 Focus on Children
 Excellence
 Integrity
 Equity
 Respect
 Health and Safety

Page 223
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 224
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 225
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Story Time
As a way to think more about how learning will happen in the future and what role the facilities play,
participants were asked to work in small groups and answer the following question:

Imagine it is 2020 and AISD has met its strategic plan goals for 2015 and has addressed many of the key
facility needs as defined in the Facility Master Plan of 2010.

Imagine you are (a student, a community member, a teacher, a staff member) Describe your typical day in
an AISD school – what does your day look like?

1. What are you doing? What is the process of learning and what are the outcomes or expectations?
2. Who are you with? How is your day organized?
3. What is your environment like? Where are you and how do you feel?
4. What makes AISD a special place to learn?

Page 226
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Day Two: Reflections


While Day One was about creating a Facility Master Plan Vision Statement, Day Two of the workshop
was about creating Facility Principles. Facility Principles create overarching ideas about what‟s
important for all schools in AISD.

To start off Day Two the group reflected on Day One and on a video assigned as homework:
Dave Eggers‟ Wish: Once Upon a School.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dave_eggers_makes_his_ted_prize_wish_once_upon_a_school.html

Page 22
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Provocation IV: John A. Johnson


From the KnowledgeWorks website: http://www.kwfdn.org/resource_library/_resources/sacc_video_guide.asp

"Schools as Centers of Community: John A. Johnson Achievement Plus Elementary School” is a video
case study and discussion guide that assists local leaders and residents in creating constructive,
meaningful dialogue on the importance of good school design and ways schools can become centers
of their communities. KnowledgeWorks Foundation partnered with the American Architectural
Foundation to create the guide and video.

Video link:
http://www.archfoundation.org/aaf/gsbd/Videos.SCC.htm

Page 228
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Principles
Starting with the Austin ISD 2010-2015 Strategic Plan Strategies, participants worked in small groups to
define Facility Principles. Facility Principles are overarching ideas about what‟s important for all schools in
the Austin Independent School District.

For each of the Strategies groups defined what this meant for facilities. So, for example, if the Austin ISD is
committed to an engaging/healthy experience for all students, this means what in terms of facilities.

Page 229
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to


An engaging/healthy experience for all students …

This means…
• All schools will have a space identified to engage parents and be responsive to student needs
(learning/language/cultural/socioeconomic)
• All schools will have spaces dedicated to active learning and diverse learning styles
• All schools will be equipped to provide technology resources in classrooms and other learning
areas
• Create and maintain clean and attractive grounds that encourage physical activities
• Provide safe entry and exit for cyclists, walkers, skateboarders, etc.
• Develop spaces that promote social and recreational interaction
• Common areas for active, hands-on group activities
• Coordinate and cooperate with other entities (YMCA, YWCA, Parks & Recreation) to share and/or
build new facilities (pools, gyms, parks)
• All schools will have good indoor air quality, climate control, and day-lighting
• Our facilities will support high quality, rigorous, well rounded learning

Page 230
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to


Strong relationships with students/families/community …

This means…
• Community hubs for services and programs
• Flexible spaces and hours to accommodate changes in learning styles, instructional delivery
supported by technological resources for students, families and communities
• Facilities to provide learning spaces that support student collaboration, teamwork and relationship
building

Page 231
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to


Supporting and engaging high quality effective staff …

This means…
• AISD facility decisions promote long-term value
• AISD facilities should be equitable and adequate across the district
• AISD staff and community must have input into facility decisions to ensure adequate resources
(examples: space, storage, technology, outlets)
• AISD facilities to provide high quality professional development spaces
• AISD facilities must provide an appropriate environment for staff effectiveness (example: HVAC,
light, acoustics, security)
• AISD facilities must include adequate, flexible-use core facilities (library, gym, cafeteria)
• AISD staff must have appropriate access to various spaces to meet student needs of a high quality
rigorous educational experience

Page 232
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Facility Principles

The Austin Independent School District is committed to


Aligning resources with priorities…

This means…
• Leverage Austin public and private resources for more effective and efficient use of existing and
new facilities by:
• Revisit efficiency study
• Align decisions with fiscal impact statement
• “CAN” concept (Community Action Network) to engage various public entities (e.g. UT, ACC,
Travis County, Seton, St. David‟s, etc…) for purpose of repurposing facilities including charters and
co-location
• Must at least break even or generate revenue
• Strategy for maintenance and operations to support facilities and address deferred, routine, and
preventative maintenance
• Develop detailed capital plan schedule/report that includes budget/actuals/completion dates and M
& O impact by project
• CAN concept must be integrated into bond planning process to address shared facilities and a
more comprehensive set of services
• Develop strategic partnerships to obtain private donations /endowments in excess of $50 million

Page 233
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 234
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Appendices
Contained on the following pages are the presentations from both days.

Page 235
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 236
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 237
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 238
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 239
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 240
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 241
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 242
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 243
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 244
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 245
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 246
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 247
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 248
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 249
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 250
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 251
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 252
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 253
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 254
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 255
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 256
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 257
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 258
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 259
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 260
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 261
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 262
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 263
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 264
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 265
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 266
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 267
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 268
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 269
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 270
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 271
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 272
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 273
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 274
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 275
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 276
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 277
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 278
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 279
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 280
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 281
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 282
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 283
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 284
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 285
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 286
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 287
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Photos taken during the Workshop

Page 288
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 289
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 290
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 291
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 292
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 293
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 294
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 295
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 296
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 297
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 298
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 299
EXHIBIT "B"
AUSTIN ISD Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop

Page 300
EXHIBIT "B"
Facility Master Plan Visioning Workshop AUSTIN ISD

Page 301
EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT


District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendices D, E, and F
Appendix D: Community Dialogue #1 Results
Appendix E: Community Dialogue #2 Results
Appendix F: Community Meeting #3 Results

Due to the volume of these reports, see the following link to access this information:

http://rcpt.yousendit.com/1042147173/d50a3fb54a75365c932c5df95adbd0c4

Page 302
EXHIBIT "B"

AUSTIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT


District-Wide Facility Master Plan

Appendix G
Summary of Facility Options Discussed by the FMPTF

Page 303
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Cut all bus service for magnet schools and signature
0.1 programs $1,994,516
Redraw boundaries for the entire district with the
0.2 greatest weight on vertical alignment Unknown Unknown $0
Move International HS from Eastside HS to ALC. Relocate
ALC students to Blackshear ES. Move Blachsear ES
0.4 students to Zavala ES Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Allan ES as a Pre-K thru 8 and move Allison ES
attendance area middle school students from Martin MS
0.5 to Allan Pre-K-8 Unknown $0 $0

Repurpose Blackshear ES to a Pre-K - 8 school, and Oak


Springs ES as a Pre-K - 6th, move middle school students
0.6 from these attendance zones from Kealing MS Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Campbell ES as a Pre-K -8th school and move
middle school students from Kealing MS to Campbell Pre-
0.7 K-8th Unknown $0 $0
Repurpose Brentwood ES as a Pre-K-6th school, move
sixth grade students in this attendance zone from Lamar
0.8 MS to Brentwood PreK-6 School Unknown $0 $0

Repurpose Zavala ES to a Pre-K-8th school and move


0.9 middle school students from Martin MS to the new school Unknown $0 $0
Add a sixth grade class to Metz ES, Govalle ES, Ortega ES,
Norman ES, and Sims ES, move sixth grade students from
0.10 Martin MS and Garcia MS. Unknown $0 $0

Assuming all changes in options 0.5 through 0.10 are


made, repurpose Martin MS as adminstrative center.
Move remaining Martin students to Kealing MS. Remove
magnet program from Kealing MS. Move 500 students to
Lamar MS and 300 students to Covington MS. Move
middle schol population of Cowan ES from Covington
0.11 MS to Bailey MS. Unknown $0 $0
Reassign portion of students from Small MS to Gorzycki
0.13 MS $0 $0 $0

Purchase shopping center with adequate space for all


district adminstrative functions and a movie theater for a
Performing Arts Center. Sell CAC and discontinue all
0.14 leases. Rent the PAC when not in use. $0
Charge a fee for general transfers, reducing fee for low-
0.15 income families Unknown $0 $0

Move the media center and professional library services


0.16 together with PDC for better utilization of resources Unknown TBD TBD
0.17 Build three new elementary schools - Undesignated $0 $0 $79,700,000

Page 304
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Build a new middle school - Southeast (land funded from
0.18 previous bond) $0 $0 $55,700,000
Build a new high school - South (land funded from
0.19 previous bond) $0 $0 $106,600,000
0.20 School for Young Men

Global option to remove 6th grade from all elementary


0.21 schools when room is available in middle schools
Consolidate Reilly ES and Ridgetop ES at a new school
1.1 built on the Reilly ES site $2,076,204 $7,734,391 $24,000,000
1.2 Reassign students from Brown ES to Reilly ES $0 $0 $0
Move a portion of student population from Cowan ES to
2.1 Boone ES ($72,607) $0 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES
2.2 and Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0

Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.


2.2A Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES $1,259,273 $8,466,116 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.
Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES
and Cunningham ES. Adjust boundaries between
2.2 B Cowan ES and Boone ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.
Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES
2.2 C and Cunningham ES. $1,266,595 $8,466,116 $0
Close Joslin ES and move students to Sunset Valley ES.
Move a portion of Sunset Valley ES students to Boone ES
2.2 D and Cunningham ES. $1,276,967 $8,466,116 $0
Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Patton ES, and
2.3 Boone ES ($59,185) $0 $0
Adjust boundaries between Williams ES and Cunningham
2.4 ES ($2,241) $0 $0

2.5 Adjust boundaries between Odom ES and St Elmo ES $0 $0 $0


Close Oak Springs ES and Zavala ES and consolidate into
3.1 Blackshear ES and Govalle ES $2,369,043 $10,681,507 $0
Close Allan ES and move students into Govalle ES and
3.2 Norman ES $1,257,574 $11,546,218 $0

Close Allan ES and repurpose as an administrative


building. Move student population to Govalle ES and
Norman ES, adjust boundaries of Oak Springs ES, Zavala
3.2B ES, Brooke ES and Ortega ES $1,257,574 $0 $0
Close Zavala ES and Brooke ES move students into a new
elementary school. Close Allan ES and move students
3.3 into Govalle ES, Norman ES, and Ortega ES $3,843,266 $23,479,180 $28,100,000

Page 305
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact

3.4 Adjust boundaries for Maplewood ES and Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

Close Oak Springs ES and Ortega ES and consolidate


3.5 students into Blackshear ES, Sims ES, and Norman ES $2,300,842 $10,308,022 $0
3.6 Close Pease ES $712,296 $7,302,501 $0
Close Govalle ES and Oak Springs ES and move students
3.7 to Allan ES, Zavala ES, and Blackshear ES $2,510,507 $16,136,129 $0

Repurpose Blackshear ES as a Hutson-Tillotson


3.8 demonstration school, training site for future teachers $0 $0 $0
Close Brooke ES and move students to Allan ES and
Zavala ES. Adjust boundary between Allan ES and
3.9 A Norman ES. $1,301,382 $5,477,387 $0
3.9 B1 Close Ortega ES and move students to Govalle ES. $1,153,873 $6,082,090 $0
Close Oak Springs ES and move students to Blackshear
3.9 B2 ES. $1,146,969 $4,225,932 $0

Close Sanchez ES and move students north of Town Lake


to Zavala ES and Metz ES. Adjust boundaries between
Zavala ES and Linder ES. Build a new 800-student
elementary south of Town Lake to receive students from * included in
3.9 C Sanchez ES, Metz ES and Travis Heights ES. $1,556,924 $9,424,688 Option 0.17

Close Allan ES and repurpose as a middle school for


Young Men, repurpose Martin MS as a middle school for
Young Women. Reassign Allan ES students to Govalle ES,
3.12 Ortega ES and Norman ES $12,203 $0 $15,389,258
Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Ortega ES,
3.13 Oak Springs ES and Allan ES $1,363,538 $11,910,197 $0
Close Blackshear ES and reassign students to Oak Springs
3.14 ES and Zavala ES $984,538 $7,291,599 $0

Close Govalle ES and reassign students to Brooke ES,


Ortega ES and Oak Springs ES. Close Allan ES and
reassign students to Brooke ES and Norman ES. Adjust
3.16 boundaries between Brooke ES and Zavala ES. $2,873,104 $23,456,415 $0
4.1A Close Dawson ES and move students to Becker ES $1,422,157 $6,110,749 $0
Close Becker ES and move student population to
4.1B Dawson ES $1,422,157 $7,036,234 $0
Close Becker ES, Barton Hills ES, and Zilker ES and
4.2 consolidate into new elementary school $3,282,691 $24,580,169 $28,100,000
Adjust boundaries between Becker ES, Dawson ES, Travis
4.3 Heights ES, and Linder ES ($80,539) $0 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students
4.4A into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,201,810 $11,930,384 $0

Page 306
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Close Barton Hills ES and Zilker ES and move students to
4.4B Becker ES and Dawson ES. $2,266,637 $17,543,935 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Becker ES and move students
4.5 into Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0
Close Barton Hills ES and Joslin ES and move students into
4.6 Zilker ES and Dawson ES $2,367,541 $13,360,266 $0

Close Barton Hills ES and reassign students to Zilker ES and


4.7 close Becker ES and reassgin students to Dawson ES $2,207,301 $11,930,384 $0

Reassign a portion of Linder ES to Travis Heights ES and


4.8 reassign a portion of Travis Heights ES to Becker ES $0 $0 $0
Do not accept transfers into Bryker Woods ES, Casis ES,
5.1 Gullett ES, and Highland Park ES $0 $0 $0
Discontinue the option to offer 6th grade at Bryker
5.2 Woods ES $0 $0 $0
Adjust boundaries between Bryker Woods ES, Gullett ES,
5.3 and Brentwood ES $0 $0 $0
Build new school and adjust boundaries for Highland
5.4 Park ES, Doss ES, and Hill ES $0 $0 $25,200,000

5.5 Adjust boundaries between Mathews ES and Casis ES $0 $0 $0


Adjust boundaries between Norman ES, Overton ES, and
6.1 Ortega ES ($1,220) $0 $0

Add Pre-K center to Winn ES to provide relief for Andrews


6.3 ES, Pecan Springs ES, Jordan ES and Overton ES Unknown $0 $0
Move Kealing MS magnet program to Martin MS. Move
student population of Martin MS into Kealing MS with
7.1 remaining neighborhood students ($186,096) $0 $0
Reassign O. Henry MS/Austin HS students to Martin
7.2 MS/Eastside HS $0 $0 $0
7.3 Reassign Martin MS students to Fulmore MS $0 $0 $0
7.4 Create new K-8 schools at Martin MS and Allan ES $0 $0 $0
Close Webb MS and reassign students into Pearce MS,
8.1 Dobie MS, and Lamar MS $1,865,782 $11,454,070 $0
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into
Garcia MS, Webb MS and Lamar MS. Reassign a portion
8.2A of Webb MS students to Dobie MS $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0
Close Pearce MS and reassign student population into
Garcia and Webb MS. Reassign a portion of Webb
students to Dobie. Improve vertical alignment for Webb
8.2B students $1,881,140 $7,443,511 $0
Close ALC and move students to Webb MS. Reassign
Webb MS students to Dobie MS, Lamar MS, and Pearce
8.3 MS $1,567,984 $12,262,155 $0

Page 307
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact
Close Webb MS and repurpose school as a School for
8.4 Young Men ($98,844) $0 $0
Reassign a portion of Bedichek MS population to
9.1 Covington MS ($28,677) $0 $0
Adjust boundary between Bedichek MS and Covington
9.2 MS ($234,298) $0 $0

10.1 Adjust boundary between Reagan HS and McCallum HS $0 $0 $0

Improve programming at Reagan HS by providing cross-


training and mentoring with McCallum staff. Provide
nurturing environment to draw students back into
10.2 Reagan HS. $0 $0 $0
Give Reagan HS students the option to attend
specialized signature programs at McCallum HS with
10.3 transportation provided. $0 $0
10.4 Close Eastside HS and consolidate into Reagan HS ($539,373) $0 $0
Close Reagan HS and CAC, repurpose Reagan HS as
10.5 administrative center $0 $0 $0
Close Reagan HS and repurpose as Junior College /
10.6 ACC Partner $0 $0 $0
Identify surplus portables and build new elementary
11.1 school in the next bond $0 $0 $0
Repurpose Langford ES as a Pre-K center and adjust
11.2 boundaries with adjacent schools $0 $0 $0

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as elementary school to


provide relief for Hart ES, Graham ES, Walnut Creek ES
and Barrington ES. Reassign Dobie MS students to Webb
12.1 MS and Pearce MS ($437,477) $0 $0
Discontinue 6th grade at Barrington ES and Walnut
12.2 Creek ES $0 $0 $0
Adjust boundaries between Wooten ES and Brentwood
12.3 ES $0 $0 $0
Assign the remaining 2008 undesignated elementary included in
school to north central Austin (in addition to 2004 Bond 2008 bond
12.4 Program ES) $0 $0 program
Build a new elementary school in north central Austin (in
12.5 addition to 2004 Bond Program ES) $0 $0 $28,100,000

Close Dobie MS and repurpose as an elementary school,


reassign students to Webb MS. Adjust boundaries
between Webb MS and Pearce MS. Move a portion of
student population from Graham ES and Hart ES to new
Dobie Elementary. Adjust boundaries between Graham
ES and Walnut Creek ES and between Hart ES and
12.6 Barrington ES TBD $0 $1,056,778

Page 308
Facility Master Plan Task Force - Summary of Options EXHIBIT "B"

NOTE: Highlighted options were presented at the Community Meetings held on January 12 & 13, 2011
Cost Future Bond
Option Description M&O Savings Avoidance Impact

Repurpose Garcia MS as a 4 - 8 school and reassign a


portion of the population (Sims ES and Norman ES
attendance areas) to Pearce MS. Reassign Overton ES
12.7 and Jordan ES 4 - 5 grade to new Garcia 4 - 8.
Adjust boundaries between Maplewood ES and
13.1 Campbell ES $0 $0 $0

Build new elementary school in Mueller to relieve


13.2 overcrowding at Andrews ES, Harris ES, and Blanton ES ($58,093) $0 $24,000,000

13.3 Adjust boundaries between Andrews ES and Winn ES ($84,811) $0 $0


Build a Pre-K center to relieve Andrews ES, Winn ES,
13.4 Blanton ES, Pecan Springs ES, and Blanton ES $0 $0 $21,600,000
14.1 Build a new school west of Clayton ES $0 $0 $25,200,000
Adjust boundaries between Mills ES, Kiker ES, Cowan ES,
14.2 and Boone ES ($6,120) $0 $0
14.3 Add a K-8th grade school in southwest area Unknown $0

14.4 Adjust boundaries between Clayton ES and Baldwin ES $0 $0 $0


14.5 Repurpose Boone ES as a PK - 8 school $0 $0 $0
Repurpose Casey ES as a Pre-K Center and adjust
boundaries between Williams ES, Menchaca ES, Casey
15.1 ES, Odom ES, and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $0
Build Pre-K center in the Williams ES attendance zone to
relieve Williams ES, Casey ES, Menchaca ES, Odom ES,
15.2 and Pleasant Hill ES $0 $0 $21,600,000
Create a career center and add a magnet program to
16.1 Crockett HS to attract students Unknown

16.2 Adjust boundaries between Akins HS and Crockett HS $0 $0 $0


Adjust boundaries between Murchison MS, Burnet MS,
17.1 Dobie MS, and Webb MS ($191,587) $0 $0

Move middle school population of Lee ES, Campbell ES,


and Maplewood ES attendance zones to Lamar MS.
Create more room at Kealing MS to expand program
17.2 and increase diversity ($73,218) $0 $0
Add a fine arts focus to Lamar MS to attract students and
17.3 increase enrollment Unknown $0 $0
17.4 Close either Pearce MS or Webb MS Unknown $0 $0
Create a sixth grade center with students from Webb MS,
17.5 Pearce MS, Dobie MS, Garcia MS. $0 $0 Unknown

Page 309

You might also like