TELECOMMUNICATIONS OFFICE-X

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

For the rating period to , 20
PEF-1
Employee: OFFICE/DIVISION:

Position: SECTION/UNIT :

PART 1. PERFORMANCE
TARGETS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS RATINGS
Weight Work / Activity Unit of Measure Indicator QUANTITY QUALITY TIME SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE
% Target Accomp Target Accomp Target Accomp QN QL T APS EPS QN QL T APS EPS

Total Equivalent Point Score

Multiply by Percentage Weight Allocation
Supervisor (50%) Subordinate (20%)
Weighted Average Point Score (WAS)
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE TARGETS: Legend: PERC Action:
QN - Quantity
QL - Quality
T - Timeliness

Rater Ratee Date APS - Average Point Score

EPS - Equivalent Point Score
 NON-SUPERVISORY POSITION
PART II. CRITICAL FACTORS SUMMARY OF RATINGS

WEIGHT SUPERVISOR EMPLOYEE WEIGHT Weighted Over-all

ALLOCATION CRITICAL FACTORS (10%) (5%) RATER ALLOCATION Score Weighted
100% Rating EPS Rating EPS Part 1 Part 2 (WS) Scores
1. COURTESY Polite, kind and thoughtful behavior toward the public/clientle 70% 30% Part 1 Part 2
20% in manner of spech and actions
Supervisor 50% 10%

2. HUMAN RELATIONS Integrates concerns for people at work, office clientele,

20% Employee 20% 5%
and supervisor-subordinate relationship-into work situation
3. PUNCTUALITY AND Observed behavior of coming to the office on time or to be
20% Subordinate N/A
ATTENDANCE present at work to complete assigned responsibilities
4. INITIATIVE Starts action, projects and performed assigned tasks
20% Peer 10%
without being told and under minimal supervision.
5. LEADERSHIP The manner of guiding, influencing, motivating and developing
Client 5%
(for supervisors only) confidence of subordinates to work as a team and accomplish
task, leading the organizational unit to achieve its goal and
Total Overall Score
objectives enthusiastically
6. JUDGEMENT/ Ability to develop alternative solutions to problems, to
Add: Rating on Intervening Task (if any)
DECISION MAKING evaluate facts or courses of actions, and to reach sound
(for supervisors only) decision and redness to take action or commit oneself
7. STREES TOLERANCE Stability of performance under pressure or opposition FINAL NUMERICAL
15%
PERFORMANCE RATING
8. OTHERS (specity)
5%

TOTAL EPS
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL RATING
Multiply by Supervisor (10%) Employee (5%)
Weight Allocation 0.10 0.05
Weighted Score (WS)
WE DISCUSS AND AGREE ON THE ABOVE RATINGS

PART III - EPS INTERVINING TASKS

Work Activity in Performance Standards Rating
terms of Output
Ratee Rater Confirmed by Next Higher Date
Supervisor
PERC ACTION