Professional Documents
Culture Documents
doc
Page 1 of 2
Monday, March 17
* Enact a physical limit on carbon dioxide emissions (also called a hard cap) for large
users of fossil fuels that steadily declines to zero.
* Eliminate all subsidies and tax breaks for fossil fuels, nuclear power and biofuels
from food crops.
* Build demonstration energy supply plants including solar thermal, solar
photovoltaic and carbon dioxide capture in microalgae for liquid fuel production.
* Leverage government purchasing power to create markets for advanced
technologies such as plug-in hybrid vehicles.
* Ban new coal-fired plants unless they include reliable carbon capture and storage.
* Create and enforce stringent efficiency standards for appliances, transportation and
buildings.
“If we do everything right,” he said Saturday, “we can get rid of carbon dioxide in 30
to 50 years.”
While he was preaching to the choir somewhat, Makhijani presented a number of
ideas he admitted they may not all agree with.
“We are in deep trouble,” he said, if we don’t cut down our carbon dioxide emissions.
“The planet is in intensive care. What do you do when you’re in intensive care with
cancer? You do toxic things to your body to get rid of it. If you want to survive, you
have to do some nasty things.”
This related to many people’s concerns about the aesthetics of wind turbines, he
said. “If you want to look at electricity, do that. Don’t worry about the view. This
argument needs to be settled. We have to get tough. We don’t have a lot of time.”
Makhijani said he did not agree with alternative fuel sources such as wheat or corn.
“By turning food to fuel and fuel into food … how stupid are we?”
He worried that the world has not yet weighed the effect of these sources. “We don’t
know the net of Brazilian ethanol, poor residents getting pushed out.”
Another bumper sticker, he said, is that “Weeds are the answer.”
“Microalgae have been demonstrated to capture over 80 percent of the daytime
carbon dioxide emissions from power plants and can be used to produce up to
10,000 gallons of liquid fuel per acre per year,” wrote Makhijani.
He also disagreed with the idea of carbon offsets. “I’m against you salving your
conscience by paying somebody to plant a tree,” he said. “I was surprised to come to
the conclusion that we can actually get rid of it all without all this funny money.”
The idea of virtue played a big role in his discussion Saturday. “I assume that the
number of virtuous people in the United States will not change. We don’t have time
to convince everyone to be virtuous. If you want to do that, we’re going to fail.”
He told the group that the public needed to lead this movement. “We need the
leadership of the people. The wind is you, just remember that. You have to create
that political wind so politicians feel it.”
Nicole Orne can be reached at norne@reformer.com