Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at .
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ncfr. .
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
National Council on Family Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The Family Coordinator.
http://www.jstor.org
Conceptionsof Love at Three Developmental
Levels*
DAVID H. KNOX, JR.*
A scale developed by Knox in 1967 was modified and administered to 100 high
school seniors, 100 persons married less than five years, and 100 persons married
more than 20 years. For consistency of reporting, all of the respondentswere white
and middle-class. A romantic conception of love was found among the high school
seniors and those married more than twenty years, whereas a realistic conception of
love was indicated by those married less than five years. Speculative interpretations
were suggested for the various love conceptions at the respective developmental
levels.
A review of the literature on sex educa- Probably the most significant finding of
tion revealed that no summary existed of the survey was that most states had no law
the legislative status of sex and birth con- either authorizing or prohibiting the teach-
trol education in the United States. Conse- ing of sex or birth control education in
quently, the author conducted a survey by their schools. In 48 states and territories
mail questionnaires to directors of health nothing was said either favoring or prohib-
and physical education and recreation or to iting sex education. In fully 54 cases there
directors of health education in the state was no statute regarding birth control edu-
boards of education in the 50 states, four cation in the schools.
territories, and the District of Columbia in Six states and the District of Columbia
order to ascertain the current status of had laws or regulations favoring or at least
such education.' To verify for completeness authorizing the inclusion of sex education
and accuracy, a random check including a in the schools. These include Illinois (Act
search through the appropriatestatutes was passed in 1965); Maryland (By-Law of the
made of ten returns. In all ten cases there state board of education, passed in 1967);
was agreement between the return and the Michigan (Act passed in 1968); Oregon
statutes for that state or territory. Two (Act passed in 1945); Utah (Though not
states, Massachusetts and Tennessee, and specifically referred to, at least one form of
one territory, the Virgin Islands, did not sex education seems to be implied in an ar-
reply. Status in those three cases was deter- ticle that requires the teaching of physiol-
mined by a search of the annotated stat- ogy and hygiene in the elementaryschools.
utes. The survey results first appeared in a See section 53-2-26 of the Annotated Stat-
larger unpublished paper by the author in utes, State of Utah); and Wisconsin (A
August, 1968, and subsequently were up- 1968 Act, similar to the case of Utah. See
dated to June, 1969. sections 118.01, 2 and 5, in Annotated Stat-
utes, State of Wisconsin.).
** Currentlyemployed as a regional coordina- An interesting feature of the survey was
tor in Santa Monica, California,and residing at the informal support of sex education by
1335 Cedar Street, Santa Monica. Intern, Center the state boards of education in at least
for PopulationPlanning, Universityof Michigan, thirteen states and two territories. State
1968-69. boards of education have indicated support
'A sample of the coverletter and questionnaire
used in the surveywill be furnishedby the author through the provision of curriculum
upon recuest. guides, by conducting sex education work-
April 1970 THE FAMILYCOORDINATOR 157