Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guided By Submitted By
Abstract:
To make a satellite phone call today from a location that does not offer terrestrial wire line
or wireless coverage requires the use of a large, costly terminal, and entails very high per
minute charges. Further, the quality of service is relatively poor because of annoying
echoes, large transmission delays, over talk associated with satellite communications using
geostationary satellites.
There is a trend for mobile satellite system architectures aimed at the deployment of
multi-satellite constellations in Non-Geostationary Earth Orbits. This allows the user
terminals to be small size, low cost and having low power demand. In present and next
generation satellite systems, CDMA has been proposed as the multiple access technique for
a number of mobile satellite communication systems. To enhance the coverage and quality
of service, Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) constellations are usually selected. Here, we analyze
the performance of the downlink of a LEO satellite channel. The provision of such a
service requires that the user have sufficient link quality for the duration of service. To
have sufficient link quality, the user must have an adequate power to overcome the path
loss and other physical impairments to provide acceptable communication and improve the
performance of the system.
Thus, in many parts of the world, the demand for communications mobility can be met
effectively only through global mobile satellite services. Handheld satellite phones are
therefore forecast as the emerging mobile communications frontier with growth that could
parallel recent growth in cellular mobile industry. In order to guarantee the service quality
and reliability for mobile satellite communication systems, we have to take into account
outages due to obstruction of the line-of-sight path between a satellite and a mobile
terminal as well as the signal fluctuation caused by interference from multipath radio
waves. Thus, we need a good characterization for the satellite propagation channel. It is
commonly accepted that satellite communications systems (in particular, low earth orbit
LEO systems) are the de facto solution for providing the real personal communications
services (PCS’s) to the users either stationary or on the move anywhere, anytime and in any
format (voice, data, and multimedia).
The satellite segment is a network of GEO or LEO satellites arranged in orbital planes (i.e.
different parts of the sky) in such a way that they have a communications link with end-
user equipment, ground gateways and other satellites. The gateway connects the satellites
to the local telephone network. The gateway also transmits signals to the satellites and
receives transmission from the satellites. Due to the high mobility of low earth orbit (LEO)
satellites, there is a significant number of handover attempts in a LEO-based mobile
satellite communication system, causing a high handover failure rate. This paper proposes
to extend the period of which a handover request is valid, and thus rendering higher
probability of successful handover.
distance from earth, lower power requirement and thus smaller mobile terminal (MT) size,
LEO satellite system is a preferable choice. Differences between satellite and terrestrial
systems exist in spite of common objectives for high quality services and excellent
spectrum efficiency. Some differences arise because:- user costs are closely related to
satellite transmit power the satellite propagation channel is highly predictable satellite paths
introduce significant propagation delays and Doppler shifts frequency co-ordination has to
be on a global basis frequency re-use options are more limited, hence bandwidth is a tight
constraint satellite beam shaping and sizing opportunities are limited.
The most significant attribute of any satellite communication system is the wide area
coverage that can be provided with very high guarantees of availability and consistency of
service. Satellite communication systems are designed to provide voice, data, fax, paging,
video conferencing and internet services to users worldwide. Through satellite based
systems, users will be able to make a phone call from an African safar i or while sailing
around the world. No matter where users are, they will be able to communicate with
clients, customers, associates, friends, and family anywhere in the world. In addition,
satellite communications will allow countries to provide phone services without large
investments in landline or wireless systems. Satellite communications will be one of the
fastest growing areas within the communications industry.
INDEX
TOPIC PAGE NO.
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2. CLASSIFICATION OF MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNIC ATION SYSTEMS 4
2.1 GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE. 4
2.2 QUASI-ZENITH SATELLITE. 4
2.3 NON-GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE. 4
2.3.1 HIGHLY ELLIPTIC ORBIT (HEO). 6
2.3.2 MEDIUM EARTH ORBIT (MEO). 7
2.3.3 LOW EARTH ORBIT (LEO). 7
3. SOME LEO SATELLITE SYSTEM 8
3.1 THE IRIDIUM SYSTEM 8
3.2 THE GLOBALSTAR SYSTEM 10
3.3 THE TELEDESIC SYSTEM 12
4. MEO SATELLITE SYSTEM 13
4.1 THE ICO SYSTEM 13
5. OVREVIEW OF HOW A MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEM WORKS 15
5.1 HOW A SATELLITE CALL GETS ROUTED 15
5.2 HANDOVER MANAGEMENT IN MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEMS 17
6. GENERAL ASPECTS OF MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEMS 19
7. CAPABILITIES OF MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEMS 20
8. LIMITATIONS OF MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEMS 21
9. GROWTH DRIVERS OF MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SERVICES 26
10. WHO WILL USE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS? 27
11. GLOBAL MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES 28
12. APPLICATION OF MOBILE SATELLITE SYSTEM 29
13. CONCLUSION 32
14. BIBLIOGRAPHY 32
INTRODUCTION
To make a satellite phone call today from a location that does not offer terrestrial wireline
or wireless coverage requires the use of a large, costly terminal, and entails very high per
minute charges. Further, the quality of service is relatively poor because of annoying
echoes, large transmission delays, overtalk associated with satellite communications
using geostationary satellites. The next generation of satellite communication systems
will use advances in satellite systems, wireless technologies, and miniaturization, to
provide global mobile satellite services that will make calls between any two locations on
earth much easier, much more affordable and much more user friendly.
Even in the year 2000, the terrestrial cellular coverage is available to less than 60% of the
world’s population and only about 15% of the earth’s total surface. More than 3 billion of
the world’s population have no phone service. The waiting list of landline telephone
service has over 50 million names with the average wait greater than 1.5 years. Rural
areas, regions, that are sparsely populated in developed countries and large parts of the
developing world are destined to be underserved or to remain out of reach of terrestrial
mobile services altogether. Thus, in many parts of the world, the demand for
communications mobility can be met effectively only through global mobile satellite
services. Handheld satellite phones are therefore forecast as the emerging mobile
communications frontier with growth that could parallel recent growth in cellular mobile
industry. Regardless of how you look at the numbers, there is a significant amount of
people without phone service throughout the world. Mobile Satellite communication
services will solve the need of worldwide travelers and provide phone services to many
areas of the world that currently do not have p hone service. The emerging next
generating mobile systems are generally referred as GMPCS, for Global Mobile Personal
Communication by Satellites.
Until now Communication Satellites have operated using Geo-Stationery Orbits (GEO),
lying above 36,000 kilometers above the earth’s surface. From this Orbit the satellite
appears to be stationery (fixed) above a specific location from earth, thereby ensuring
continuous, uninterrupted coverage to that location. The primary role of a geostationary
communications satellite is to act as a wireless repeater station in space that operates in a
broadcast mode and provides a microwave link between two remote locations on earth.
The key components of a communication satellite include various transponders,
transceivers, and antennas that are tuned to the allocated frequency channels. Although
the Geostationary Satellites have a large footprint, so that the entire surface of the earth
can be covered by few such satellites, their high altitude leads to very long roundtrip
signal delays and resultant degradation in service quality.
There is a trend for mobile satellite system architectures aimed at the deployment
of multi-satellite constellations in Non-Geostationary Earth Orbits (NGEOs).This allows
the user terminals to be small size, low cost and having low power demand.To enhance
the coverage and quality of service, Low Earth Orbiting (LEO) constellations are usually
selected. To supports a wide range of services and to provide superior service quality
comparable to that available from terrestrial wireless and wireline networks,
constellations of satellites operating in Low Earth Orbits (LEO) or Medium Earth Orbits
(MEO) are considered more suitable.
A number of various global mobile satellite communica tions systems have already been
in development stages. With the first global mobile satellite services initiated in 1998.
The four such systems that are in advanced stages of planning or early implementations
are Iridium, Globalstar, ICO and Teledesic.
The era of satellite-based mobile communications systems started with the first
MARISAT satellite which was launched into a geostationary orbit over the Pacific Ocean
in 1976 to provide communications between ships and shore stations. The combination of
high cost and unacceptably large equipment has kept mobile satellite communications
(MSC) systems from appealing to the wider market of personal mobile communications.
However, the progress made over the last ten years in digital voice processing, satellite
technology, and component miniaturization has resulted in the viability of MSC systems
in responding to the growing market in personal mobile
Communications.The system architectures of each system are presented along with a
description of the satellite and user handset designs, the multi-access techniques
employed, and an analysis of their respective cost structures.It is concluded that the
technical feasibility of satellite-based mobile communications systems seems to be
secure. It will be challenging however, for the vendors to actually develop and deploy
these systems in a cost effective, timely, and reliable way that meets a continually
evolving set of requirements driven by user expectations fueled by a rapidly changing
technology base.
In order to guarantee the service quality and reliability for mobile satellite
communication systems, we have to take into account outages due to obstruction of the
line-of-sight path between a satellite and a mobile terminal as well as the signal
fluctuation caused by interference from multipath radio waves. Thus, we need a good
characterization for the satellite propagation channel. It is commonly accepted that
satellite communications systems (in particular,low earth orbit LEO systems) are the de
facto solution for providing the real personal communications services (PCS’s) to the
users either stationary or on the move anywhere, anytime and in any format (voice,
data,and multimedia).Satellite communication systems have provided international
telecommunications services since the 1960’s. These systems were augmented in the
1970’s and 1980’s with regional satellite systems, national systems, and private network-
based very small aperture terminals (VSAT’s). Throughout this period, systems have
been based exclusively on satellites in geosynchronous orbit communicating with earth
stations using high gain fixed antennas. As the systems have evolved, the original 30-m-
diameter Intelsat earth stations have evolved into 1.2- m -band VSAT’s for business and
home TV usage, but the basic system architecture explaining a geosynchronous
spacecraft has not changed during this period. With the launch of the first Iridium
spacecraft in 1997 and 1998, a significant new architecture has been introduced into the
field of satellite communications. These systems are based upon the use of LEO and
medium earth orbiting (MEO) systems. hese LEO and MEO systems have several
advantages over geosynchronous systems. The most significant advantages are:
1) The reduction in range provides a large decrease in path loss resulting in much small
receiving antennas and
The geostationary satellite is the artificial satellite which looks stationary from the ground.
3-4 geostationary satellites can cover almost the entire surface of the earth. Most of the
artificial satellites actually used for communications or broadcasting are geostationary
satellites.
The quasi- zenith satellite is an artificial satellite of the satellite system where one satellite
always stays near the zenith in Japan by positioning at least three satellites synchronously
on the orbit inclined at 45 degrees from the geostationary orbit. As the ground surface orbit
draws the shape of number 8, it's also called "Number 8 Orbit Satellite". It can obtain a
high elevation angle to reduce the influence of buildings and so forth (blocking.)
Satellites in GSO
GSO satellites orbit the Earth in the equatorial plane with the same angular velocity as the
Earth at a height of about 36 000 km above the equator. Geostationary satellites therefore
appear stationary to an earth-bound observer and a single satellite can provide continuous
service to roughly one third of the Earth's surface (but excluding
polar regions above ± 75 degrees of latitude). The maximum distance the satellite can "see"
on the Earth's surface is about 42 000 km and means the propagation delay for a single hop
via the satellite (once up and down) can be up to 280 ms. Geostationary satellites also move
about their nominal positions causing a small but noticeable Doppler shift on both the
feeder and mobile links.For personal and vehicle terminals, handover during a call between
GSO satellites is unnecessary because the coverage is static and wide. However handover
might be contemplated for aircraft terminals between different spot beams of the same
satellite. In the latter case there is practically no difference in path length to consider.
Within Europe, GSO satellites appear at low elevation angles. For the geographical latitude
of 50°North (e.g.Luxembourg), the satellites reach approximately 31° ele vation as a
maximum when the satellite is due South: either East or West of this position the elevation
slowly reduces. Frequent blocking of the line-of-sight signal therefore occurs from trees,
buildings and hills. GSO satellites can work in such a shadowed environment but the
satellite Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) would have to be increased by 15 dB
to 20 dB or more depending on the coverage required.This could be achieved but has a
serious impact on the size and cost of the satellite. In addition, assuming that the mobile
EIRP is limited, the satellite receive sensitivity also has to increase and this can only be
done with very large spacecraft dish antennas. For this reason, only very low bit rate
services (i.e. paging, alerting, etc.) might be viable under such circumstances until the user
moves to a more favourable position to receive a voice call.
Satellites in HEO
For Download Visit http://www.nectarkunj.byethost14.com
Global Mobile Satellite System Communication
Satellites in HEO constellations orbit the Earth in planes that are inclined nominally 63,4°
against the equatorial plane.This is necessary in order to keep the apogees in the most
northern (southern) positions within their elliptical orbits.Typically HEO orbital periods are
between 8 and 24 hours. HEO satellites are normally active only about their apogees where
they appear nearly stationary to an earth observer for about eight hours, and then have to
hand over to a following satellite.The satellites belonging to one particular system appear
in time shift in the same celestial region. In the HEO track is sketched in profile s howing at
every point the true distance to the Earth's surface. In this specially depicted case, the
orbital period is 12 hours and the satellites appear
alternatively at the opposite sides of the rotating globe. Therefore the illustrated HEO track
reaches a maximum height at both ends above the geographical latitude of 63,4° North. At
both upper ends (solid line), the satellite payloads are active. The dotted line constitutes the
part where the satellite payloads are (typically) switched off. For comparison, see figure 2,
where two HEO loops are indicated corresponding
to the two ends in profile in figure 1.Under the above conditions, the HEO apogee
(maximum height above the Earth's surface) can be up to 42 000 km.However the
maximum range to the Earth's surface is in the order of 47 000 km resulting in a maximum
propagation delay of the order of 310 ms. HEO satellites reach high relative speeds during
their active phase (order of magnitude:2 km/s), so that the Doppler shift (1.3 x 10-5 of
radio frequency and bit rate) cannot be neglected: the radio frequency
shift is mainly due to the microwave feeder link and is of the order of 50 kHz for C-band
feeder links. The satellite motion is mainly radial relative to the user community, so that
common compensation of the Doppler main component is feasible.Irrespective of any user
roaming, HEO systems require handover from the descending to the ascending satellite
typically every eight hours. Depending on the specific system design, the distance to the
two satellites at handover could be significant and a jump in path length cannot be
excluded. However, a large Doppler jump will always happen.Within Europe HEO
satellites can appear near the zenith. Therefore the user can work under vertical line-of-
sight condition for most of the time, with blockage only being experienced in tunnels or
under bridges, trees, etc. However vertical propagation is not very good within multi-storey
buildings and hence paging, alerting, etc. may not be satisfactory.
Because vertical propagation can be in principle multipath-free, high data rate services are
possible for outdoor operation.A number of HEO orbits have been studied extensively and
given names such as "Molnya", "Tundra", and "Loopus".
Satellites in MEO
MEO satellites are in principle the same as LEO satellites. The differences are that MEO
systems cause more propagation delay (80 ms to 120 ms), their Doppler shift is smaller,
and handover happens less frequently and is less problematic. MEOs also need to work in a
multipath environment as the number of satellites is usually smaller than for LEO but the
average margins can be lower since many calls will be at a continuously high
elevation angle.The typical MEO altitude is between 10 000 km and 20 000 km, just
outside the Van Allen belts with an orbital period of around 6 to 12 hours. A complete
MEO constellation would probably require between 10 to 15 satellites. MEO satellites are
used to provide current global radio navigation services and are optimum for such services.
Satellites in LEO
LEOs are typically circular orbits where satellites fly low above the Earth's atmosphere
typically 700 to 1 500 km, bounded by outer atmospheric drag and the Van Allen radiation
belts with an orbit time of about 90 minutes. For orbits near 1 500 km, inclinations near 50
degrees reduce the risk of debris collisions. Whereas polar orbits provide a whole Earth
coverage including the poles themselves, inclined orbits can provide improved coverage
over the populated areas located between latitud es -75 to +75 degrees. One proposed
system is known to stay 700 km above the surface (see figure 1; LEO) where the coverage
area at any point in time may measure up to 3 000 km in radius for about 10 degree
elevation. This implies a maximum propagation delay of 20 ms and while higher altitude
LEO systems would have higher propagation delays, they will never approach the values
associated with GSO or HEO systems for a single satellite hop. However, on-board
processing and Inter-Satellite Links (ISL) can increase delays considerably.LEO satellites
move at very high speeds relative to the Earth's surface (7 km/s) and produce large Doppler
frequency shifts (4,7x10-5 of radio frequency and bit rate). As the velocity is tangential to
the Earth, Doppler compensation may need to be applied individually for each user.LEO
systems, in common with HEO systems, also require to handover between adjacent
satellites, but at a much more frequent rate of about ten minutes. Although the two LEO
satellites are widely spaced, the individual path lengths can be similar and it is possible to
minimise any path length jump. However, the Doppler shift jump will still always happen.
As LEO satellites orbit very close to Earth, they can be considered as moving base stations.
For the user the satellites appear most of the time below 30 degree elevation. Therefore
LEO satellites work much of the time in a multipath environment. The additional satellite
EIRP and receive sensitivity to compensate for multipath losses are achieved witha much
smaller antenna on a LEO spacecraft (compared to GSO) because of the much shorter
range (roughly 1/12th).
Diversity techniques may offset some of these multipath effects.The total number of
satellites required to give total global coverage depends on many factors including quality
of service and system capacity but the total could be as high as 70. Lower numbers are
possible using special orbits or by using a mixture of LEO and GSO (for example). The
cost for large numbers of LEO satellites is offset to some extent by their lower complexity
and easier launch requirements. However their orbital life tends to be half that of typical
GSO satellites (10 - 13 years). Another factor in LEO design is the required battery
capacity and solar panel size to allow operation for nearly 50% of time in eclipse.
routing and delivery over the terrestrial network. It is designed to complement the
terrestrial cellular mobile networks to provide telephony and messaging services to
subscribers in locations that are not covered, or inadequately covered, by conventional
wireline or wireless networks.
Globalstar’s constellation of 48 LEO satellites is designed t orbit at an altitude of 1414 km
above earth’s surface in eight orbital plans inclined at 52. With each plane to be occupied
by six satellited with a provision for one in-orbit spare satellite in each plane. The nominal
weight of each satellite is 450 kg, with a deployed span of 7 meters and working life of 7.5
years. Since Globalstar satellites do not employ intersatellite communication, they
essentially provide only transponder functions, making their design and operation less
complex and perhaps more reliable. Each satellite supports a 16-beam antenna pattern with
an average beam diameter of 2250 km. To mitigate blocking and shadowing, Globalstar
will deploy path diversity, whereby multiple satellites may be used to complete a call.
In the absence of intersatellite links, the Globalstar system makes maximum use of the
international terrestrial networks (wireline and wireless). Calls from a subscriber are routed
via a satellite to the nearest earth station/gateway, and from there they will be routed over
the existing terrestrial network. To provide the interface between the ground segment
(terrestrial networks) and space segment (Globalstar satellites) Globalstar design deploys
100 or more gateway stations distributed around the world with each station equipped with
three or five antennas that can track the trajectories of the satellites. A Globa lstar gateway
is designed to serve an area 3000 km in diameter and will be designed to take into account
the technical and administrative requirements of the coverage area. These requirements
may include such factors as coverage, quality of service, and sa tellite visibility, as well as
regulatory and contractual factors associated with national boundaries.
Globalstar uses two types of communication links: service links in the L/S band for
communication between the terminals and the space vehicle, and the gateway links in the C
band for communication between the earth stations and the space vehicle.
target for Teledesic service availability is end of year 2002. Rather than individual end
users, primary customers for the Teledesic system will be service providers in countries
around the world wishing to extend their network capabilities in terms of geographic scope
and the range of services, and also multinational corporations needing to extend the
capabilities of their enterprise networks.
The design of the Teledesic system has not been finalized. According to the original plans,
the Teledesic satellite segment was to use 840 LEO satellites in 21 planes at altitudes of
700 km. The Teledesic system now intends to deploy only 288 active LEO satellites placed
in 12 planes (24 satellites per plane) at altitudes around 1350 km. Each satellite in the
Teledesic constellation will have connections to eight of its neighboring satellites through
intersatellite links operating in the connectionless packet mode, with each satellite in this
interconnected mesh network providing necessary switching functions. The Teledesic
network is designed for dual-satellite visibility with at lest one insight satellite at a
minimum elevation of 40. This high elevation angle ensures an unobstructed and
omnidirectional view of the sky from most building tops where Teledesic terminals may be
located. Besides eliminating shadowing effects from neighboring buildings and terrain, the
high elevation angel greatly reduces the fading effects of rain at high frequencies.
wireless mobile satellite communications capability with the public land mobile networks
like GSM, D-AMPS, and PDC and their PCS variants.
ICO system is designed to use a constellation of 10 MEO satellites in intermediate circular
orbit (ICO), at an altitude of 10,355 km above the earth’s surface. The nominal weight of
these satellites at launch is less than 2000 kg. The satellites, with an expected life of 12
years, are arranged in two planes with five satellites (and one spare) in each plane: orbital
planes inclined at 45 relative to the equator. Each satellite has antennas to provide 163
transmit and receive service link beams. The orbital configuration provides coverage of
earth’s entire surface at all times and ensures significant overlap so that two or more
satellites are visible to the user and the satellite access node (SAN) at any time. Further, at
least one of the satellites appears at the high elevation angle, thereby minimizing the
probability of blocking due to shadowing effects.
The ground segment in the ICO system, which will link the ICO satellites to the terrestrial
networks, will consist of the 12 interconnected SANs located in various parts of the world.
Each SAN consists of earth stations with multiple antennas for communication with the
satellites, switching equipment, and databases to facilitate interconnection with public
telephone, data, and mobile networks. The interconnection to the public networks is
through appropriate gateways. Whereas each SAN supports VLR functions, the HLR
function can reside in one (or more) of the SANs. A SAN tracks the satellites within its
sight and will direct communication traffic to the satellite, which can provide reliable,
uninterrupted link for a given call, in terms of angle of elevation and duration of satellite
visibility. SANs also have the capability to execute handoffs from an area co vered by one
satellite to another satellite’s coverage. Such handoffs are expected to be very infrequent in
ICO’s MEO-based system. Besides the SANs, the ICO system deploys TT & C stations
connected to a satellite control center (SCC) for monitoring and co ntrolling the satellites, as
well as one or more network control centers (NCC) for overall management and control of
the ICO system. The TT & C functions are associated with 6 of the 12 interconnected
SANs.
A satellite system consists of a satellite segment, ground segment, and end-user segment .
Satellite Segment
The satellite segment is a network of GEO or LEO satellites arranged in orbital planes (i.e.
different parts of the sky) in such a way that they have a communications link with end-
user equipment, ground gateways and other satellites. The satellites transmit a continuous
signal to earth which enables the satellites, end- user equipment and
gateways to be linked together. The links allow end- users to be transferred between
satellites as the satellites move overhead (LEO systems). On the ground, there is a ground
control facility (or facilities) which manage the performance of the satellites and the
transfer of information from the satellites to the gateways.
The gateway connects the satellites to the local telephone network. The gateway also
transmits signals to the satellites and receives transmission from the satellites. The gateway
tends to have switching capabilities along with software that allows the system provider to
keep track of billing information and route calls.
End-user
The end user terminals, pagers and phones communicate with the gateway equipment,
satellites, satellite and cellular phones along with the cellular base station equipment. For
the Iridium and Globalstar systems, the endusers will use a phone slightly larger than the
average cellular phone. Both Iridium and Globalstar plan to offer dual mode handsets
which will allow users to connect to the existing cellular systems or their own satellite
system.Other systems from such companies as American Mobile Satellite and Intelsat, use
phones which are the size of a briefcase and must be unpacked before use. The paging
equipment from Iridium, the only satellite company who currently has a paging system in
place, is your normal run of the mill pager. A few satellite systems (Globalstar included)
plan to offer fixed satellite terminals which are a telephone booth in rural areas. The phone
booth will include one or more phones and will not look much different than a phone booth
you may find on the streets of New York City.
Bent pipe
In a bent pipe system (Globalstar) a call is placed by a satellite user which is then beamed
up to the nearest orbiting satellite. The satellite reflects the call to the nearest ground
gateway. Once at the gateway, the call is routed through the public telephone network to
the intended receiver of the call. The gateway must be in the line of sight of the satellite, so
the system operator must have a significant number of ground gateways to provide direct
satellite links. For the most part, a bent pipe system is less complex than an intersatellite
linked system because the brains of the system (switching) are on the ground and the
satellites are just reflectors in the sky. Bent pipe systems are easier to operate because most
of the call is transferred over the public telephone network, this also reduces the cost of the
system. Many of the technical features will be located at the gateway which will allows
most technical problems to be fixed on the ground.
Intersatellite links
In an intersatellite linked system (Iridium) a user’s call is beamed up to the nearest orbiting
satellite. When it reaches the satellite, the call enters the onboard satellite switching system
and is routed between satellites up in space. The call is then downlinked to another satellite
user or the closest local gateway to the end user. Upon
entering the gateway the call is directed to the intended receiver through the public
telephone network. The major benefit of the intersatellite linked system is that it minimizes
the cost of the ground segment (i.e. - the call is switched in the air therefore you do not
need a ground gateway in the line of sight of each satellite) and it also
minimizes the long distance and interconnect fees (much of which is bypassed in the air).
The intersatellite linked system operator is able to keep a larger dollar amo unt of each call
as compared to the bent pipe system operator.However, there is added risk and higher costs
because each satellite must have on-board switching capabilities.On-board switching also
adds to the complexity of the system because repairs must be made to satellites.
and uninformed drop call. On the other hand, if the call is able to be resumed upon the
availability of an idle channel, the short term discontinuity makes it worth than having the
call terminated and followed by setting up a new call again, which is harder because new
call is less privileged. Hence regardless of the outcome EQH scheme promises a higher
QoS.
- very low loss antennas coupled with very low loss receive filters;
- very tight transmit/receive filter specifications;
- very low noise amplifiers;
- excellent carrier/signal acquisition in presence of Doppler, noise and interference;
- power-saving and spectrum-efficient forward error correction;
- multi-path discrimination techniques might facilitate low signal-to- noise demodulator
operation
The satellite-mobile uplink and downlink are inevitably more fragile than the
corresponding feeder links (land earth station-satellite). However the feeder link itself
needs a very substantial link margin in order that the aggregate up/down performance may
be largely determined by the mobile link. These feeder links operate in higher frequency
bands where Doppler and atmospheric/meteorological disturbances can become even more
significant. The following clauses of this TR focus on particular characteristics, capabilities
and limitations of mobile satellite systems together with typical values for key parameters
where possible. However it must be recognised that most parameters are inter-dependent
and will also vary with architecture of the ground infrastructure, the satellite orbital
arrangement, and the user terminal configuration.
a frequency shifting amplifier. This does have drawbacks with regard to some aspects of
system design but it also means that any one satellite is reasonably independent of
modulation system or access method, or of service data rate or networking. This has led to
satellites being used for a variety of applications, each with different terrestrial
architectures. Provided the basic satellite parameters are satisfactory, these services can be
introduced long after launch. Future satellites may not be quite so flexible as some studies
propose to use on-board processing to improve capacity, spectrum efficiency and satellite
payload performance. The transparency concept has however proved extremely
costeffective and any on-board processing function is likely to be at least re-configurable
and re-programmable. Another feature that might be introduced for MEO or LEO is the
inter-satellite link to simplify terrestrial networking between satellites during handover.
The transparency concept has enabled mobile satellite systems to efficiently support a
range of services beyond that of voice telephony:
- high data rate services (up to 64 kbit/s) to larger antenna (0,15 m ~1,0 m, 8 dBi ~20
dBi) mobile or fixed
terminals;
- group call and broadcasting;
- low data rate paging, alerting and two-way messaging;
- terminal location finding.
Some current satellite systems are designed so that extra services can be provided at very
little additional cost. This is particularly effective when services are offered as a package to
perhaps offset the requirement for line-of-sight paths for low-cost voice telephony.
Global agreements exist for planning GSO systems via the ITU RS (formerly IFRB) for
designated frequency bands. Feeder links are normally in one of the established Fixed
Satellite Service (FSS) bands and are straightforward except for the large bandwidths
required to support peak traffic on each satellite. Mobile frequency co-ordination is not
simple however, particularly as their antenna patterns are near omni-directional and any
mobile system is likely to require exclusive access to a frequency band. The next problem,
that of re-using the frequencies as frequently as possible, is very similar in concept to
terrestrial cellular planing except that isolation is provided by satellite antenna beam
shaping rather instead of geographical spacing. Feeder links for non-GSO satellites are
more complex, particularly because of the lack of established procedures for the
many possible orbits. Furthermore, there is no orbital registration akin to that in the GSO
orbit where orbital positions are assigned to particular operators and countries. LEO and
MEO may require several widely spaced feeder LESs per satellite sector or inter-satellite
links to prevent the feeder link interfering with the geostationary orbit. In either case,
there will be additional delay and Doppler jumps. For HEO orbits where the satellites
appear to operate at the same part of the celestial sphere, feeder link planning may not be
difficult as GSO-type procedures could be applied. The magnitude of the orbit and
spectrum planning problems is partly illustrated by figure 2 which shows an azimuth -
elevation diagram for a fixed land earth station site at a latitude of approximately 50° North
(It is not computed from simulated systems but shows only the principle. Therefore slight
differences to simulated orbit constellations may exist)
The dotted line, extending from East to West in the shape of an arc, represents the
geostationary orbit with two fixed GSO satellites designated 1 and 2. The three LEO tracks
belong to one system of approximately polar orbits. The LEO satellites designated 1 and 2
For Download Visit http://www.nectarkunj.byethost14.com
Global Mobile Satellite System Communication
travel North-South. LEO satellite 1 is about to hand over to LEO satellite 2. The LEO
satellite 3 travels South-North, but this satellite No. 3 appears here at this track, due to the
Earth's revolution, only at a time shift of half a day with respect to the satellites travelling
North-South. The slight drift of the three LEO satellites towards West is caused by the
Earth's rotation, and hence the rotation of the earth station site, towards East.
At the north- north-western horizon and in the East of the zenith there are two loop-shaped
tracks of the HEO satellites designated 1, 2 and 3. The dotted lines extending from the loop
near the zenith show the branches of the track where the communication payloads are
inactive, as is here the case for the HEO satellite 2. From the diagram one can conclude that
a fixed earth station (according to CCIR Recommendation 465 [1]) at this site can
communicate with GSO satellite 1 and HEO satellite 1, even when the LEO system is in
operation. On the contrary, the links with GSO satellite 2 and HEO satellite 3 could not co-
exist with LEO satellite 3, since it passes both the other satellite positions.
Assuming, the LEO satellites' orbit period were not adjusted with the Earth's rotation, then
the LEO satellite tracks would scan across the sky like the lines on a television screen, and
co-existence with neither GSO nor HEO satellites on the same frequencies would be
possible.
7.4.3 Satellites
Satellite technology and commercial launcher capabilities have matured over the past ten
years allowing systems planners to design complex systems with confidence. However,
reliability is paramount for commercial satellite services and therefore only well
established technology, proven in space, is normally considered for major projects.
The satellite antenna is a critical system element. In order to allow operation with low-
performance hand-held PES's, the satellite antenna must provide a high gain. This can only
be achieved by using advanced array-type antenna technology, including electronic beam
forming and beam steering. The resulting spot (cell) diameters on the Earth's surface are
typically in the range 1 000 km to 3 000 km.
Technology
Technological developments have improved the power and versatility of satellites, today
they have greater capacity and lower costs. For instance, the smaller size of many of
today’s satellites lowers the cost of launching satellites. At the same time recent digital
technologies (TDMA - Time Division Multiple Access, CDMA - Code Division
Multiple Access) are being applied to satellite systems which a increases capacity and
lowers the cost of launching a system.
Globalization
People no longer are isolated from the world. People are affected by trade like never
before; Nike and Gillette are no longer just U.S. companies. Because people are traveling
halfway around the world on a moment’s notice, there is a demand for communications
services that allow people to stay in touch no matter where they are. People want
to be able to make a phone call and receive one -- they want one telephone number that can
be used anytime, anywhere in the world. Thus, we feel the development of the global
economy is a key driver of the mobile communications business.
Economic growth
Economic growth throughout the world has increased living standards which also drives
demand for communications services. As individuals increase their economic stature, one
of the first things they desire is a phone. This is a positive for satellite service providers. As
developing economies continue to grow and enter the global economy, the demand for
satellite services will increase because people will be able to afford it, and the need for
mobile services will increase .
Global roamer
The first type of satellite user will be the global roamer. The global roamer consists mainly
of business travelers who want to have the ability to make and receive calls anywhere in
the world. Iridium has conducted extensive analysis of this market and concluded that this
market will consist of 42 million people by the year 2002 .
Cellular extension
The second type of user will be individuals who wish to extend their cellular coverage to
areas where no service currently exists. Both Globalstar and Iridium plan to offer dual
mode phones which will work with GSM/TDMA/CDMA cellular systems and satellite
communications systems. An example of a dual mode user would be would be an
individual who lives in Chicago and travels to upstate Montana for a hunting trip. The
person would normally have cellular service from Ameritech but that coverage does not
include upstate Montana where no cellular coverage exists. To be able to receive service on
their Ameritech system (same phone number) in Montana, the individual would sign up
with Iridium for dual mode service. Signing up would mean that once the
individual got out of the range of their Ameritech systems, they could hit a switch on their
Iridium phone and make or receive calls outside of their Ameritech coverage zone routed
through the Iridium satellite system. This would allow for ubiquitous service for cellular
users even when they are out of range of their current cellular system.
Landline extension
The third type of satellite user will an individual who wants landline extension. In t his
instance a satellite company would install a fixed telephone booth in a rural area (e.g. in the
outskirts of India). This would enable a rural town, which currently has no means of voice
communications, to communicate with an urban area where medical, police or other
services exist. The rural town could also use the phone to call suppliers of staple products.
Fixed satellite service would mostly be used when a landline system is uneconomical or
technologically incapableor serving a particular location. Vodaphone has been using fixed
wireless phone booths in South Africa and has averaged 800 minutes of use per booth.
GEO satellite networks offer great potential for multimedia applications with their ability
to broadcast and multicast large amounts of data over a very large area thus achieving
global connectivity. Internet via satellites, in particular, GEO satellites, have the following
merits:
High bandwidth.
A Ka-band (20-30Ghz) satellite can deliver throughput of gigabits per second rates.
Inexpensive.
A satellite communications system is relatively inexpensive because there are no
cable- laying costs, and one satellite covers a very large area.
Untethered communication.
Users can enjoy untethered mobile communication anywhere within the footprints
of the satellite.
Simple network topology.
Compared with the mesh interconnection model of the terrestrial Internet, GEO
satellite networks have much simpler delivery paths. The simpler topology often
results in more manageable network performance.
Broadcast/multicast.
Satellite networks are naturally attractive for broadcast/multicast applications (such
as MBONE). In contrast, multicast in a mesh interconnection network requires
complicated multicast routing. Performance can vary for each multicast group
member and is dependent on the route from the source.
Video Conferencing:
GEO satellites can provide better quality in video conferencing due to the
available bandwidth and simpler network topology.
Conclusion
Satellite networks promise a new era of global connectivity, where geographical isolation
will no more be the barrier among continent. In this work, we have shown that indeed
many popular Internet applications perform to user expectation over satellite networks,
such as video teleconferencing, bulk data transfer, background electronic mail, and non-
real time information dissemination. Some other applications, especially highly interactive
applications such as web browsing.
Even though the systems will eventually be built, conflicts over billing and control still
remain. Operators of phone services in Europe don't like the idea of systems that would
bypass their equipment and, probably, taxes and fees. Some very complex negotiating will
be needed to calm objections by such bodies, and no doubt some interesting compromises
will be made. The iridium project's future is still uncertain, but looks rather promising as
far as space ventures go. The use of such a system in helping promote the thought of the
world as a "global village" deserves thought and, I think, respect. The global
communications industry has grown like no one ever thought it would, and the future for
iridium or an iridium- like system is, in the long run, assured
Thus the field mobile satellite communication have better prospectus in the future. As
conditions on mars are seems to be favourable for human life.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Mobile and personal communication systems and services. By RAJ PANDYA
www.google.co.in
www.howstuffworks.com
www.isl.com
www.whatis.com
www.ee.surrey.ac.uk
www.tt.dk
www.gd-decisionsystems.com/satelliteservices
www.etsi.fr
www.futron.com