Measuring Pollution in the Museum Environment - Victoria and Albert Museum Página 1 de 2

JANUARY 1995: NUMBER 14

Measuring Pollution in the Museum Environment

Nigel BladesConservation Scientist, Conservation Department

For the past 18 months the V&A Science Group has been collaborating in the European Union
-funded AMECP (Assessment and Monitoring of the Environment of Cultural Property)
project. The aims of this project are two-fold:

1. To identify and quantify pollutant chemicals in cultural property environments.

2. To develop a glass-based sensor to facilitate the assessment of these environments.

To carry out the first aim, in March 1994 a programme of systematic pollution monitoring
was begun at sites in Germany, Portugal and Great Britain. The intention is to monitor
continuously for a period of twelve to eighteen months, the pollutants being sampled onto
passive diffusion tubes, which are changed every 4-6 weeks. The pollutants selected for study
are sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, volatile organic compounds and formaldehyde. These (http://www.vam.ac.uk/imag
have been chosen because of the dangers they present to cultural property (Table 1). -popup.html)
Table 1. Damaging effects of the
Passive samplers have a number of features that make them air pollutants under study (click
suitable for a project of this nature. First, they are small and image for larger version)
need no power supply, and so can be placed unobtrusively in
galleries, display cases and storage areas. They have a very slow
uptake rate, making them ideal for long-term sampling periods
of several weeks. This in turn means that the data collected are
long-term average values. In the context of the Museum
collections, exposed to the same environments for many years, (http://www.vam.ac.uk/images/image/43940
this is more relevant than taking short-term spot readings, -popup.html)
which may not reflect the environment in the long run. Table 2 Table 2. Pollutant sampling and
lists the pollutants sought, with the sampling and analysis analysis methods (click image for
methods used. larger version)

Results of pollution analysis at

the V&A
Although monitoring has been carried out at sites in Portugal and Germany as well as in
Great Britain, because of lack of space only data from the V&A will be discussed here. Figures
1 and 2 show, respectively, the concentrations of inorganic (sulphur dioxide and nitrogen
dioxide) and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) and formaldehyde pollutants at five
locations at the V&A, averaged over the period March-September 1994.

The sampling sites were chosen to give a variety of museum environments. The Conservation
Department roof was used as an external monitoring site. The Tsui (G44) and Glass (G131)
Galleries were monitored to give an indication of air quality at two different sites within the
Museum. Two display cases in the Tsui Gallery were monitored to see what pollution levels
were like at what for many objects is their point of interface with their environment. The (http://www.vam.ac.uk/imag
display cases in this gallery are of fairly recent construction (installed 1991), and are designed -popup.html)
to seal very tightly. We were interested in how this design would affect the environment Fig. 1. Average levels of inorganic
within. pollutants at the V&A March-
September 1994 (click image for
larger version)
From Figures 1 and 2 it is apparent that pollution levels vary
considerably, depending on the particular environment. The
highest sulphur dioxide value is on the roof, with the levels in
the galleries about a third of the external value. The amounts of
sulphur dioxide found in the two cases are very small indeed.
Nitrogen dioxide has a different distribution: the gallery
concentrations are similar to the roof concentration. As with
sulphur dioxide, very low levels were found in the display
cases.

The organic pollutants behave in opposite fashion to the

inorganic ones. Very high TVOC and formaldehyde levels occur (http://www.vam.ac.uk/images/image/43942
in the display cases, compared with much lower concentrations -popup.html)
in the galleries and outside. This behaviour can be explained by Fig. 2. Average levels of organic
pollutants at the V&A March-
considering the sources of the different pollutants. Sulphur September 1994 (click image for
dioxide and nitrogen dioxide come mainly from external larger version)
sources: sulphur dioxide from fossil fuel combustion and
nitrogen dioxide from motor vehicle emissions. As would be
expected, therefore, the highest concentrations of these materials are found outside the Museum, with lesser ones further
into the heart of the building.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/res_cons/conservation/journal/cj14_jan95/pollution/index.html 31/01/2011
Measuring Pollution in the Museum Environment - Victoria and Albert Museum Página 2 de 2

The organic pollutants, on the other hand, come principally from internal sources: paints, varnishes and other surface
coatings; solvents, sealants, carpeting, textiles and wood. These are the types of materials often used in display case
construction, hence the very high TVOC levels observed in the cases examined. It is probable that most of these compounds
are harmless to the collection - they are relatively inert hydrocarbons. Some, however, can be extremely destructive. The
organic acids, given off by wood, varnishes and adhesives, are extremely damaging to metals. Formaldehyde is another
internally generated pollutant, being emitted by foams, adhesives, cardboard and fibreboard. It can harm metals and
glasses. One of the cases examined had a very high formaldehyde level, of 1300 micrograms per cubic metre (1 microgram
[µg] = 1 millionth of a gram), a typical indoor level being 10-20 µg/m3o. Fortunately this case contained only textiles, which
are unaffected by formaldehyde.

What pollutant concentrations are acceptable?

Pollution exposure limits have been set for human health (e.g. COSHH - Control of Substances Hazardous to Health
Regulations 1988); some recommendations have been made for the storage of metals in wooden cases 1 (#ref1) over
relatively short periods. However, in the museum environment it is very difficult to decide at what level a pollutant becomes
a threat. This is because of the prolonged exposure period, which may be measured in decades. Over such a time span, even
quite low concentrations may be dangerous. Although experiments have demonstrated the damage caused by high levels of
pollutants 2 (#ref2) ,3 (#ref3) , there is little published on the effects of the much lower levels realistically found in the museum
environment.

Despite this lack of data, ambient pollutant limits have been put forward, based either on experience, or what is
technologically achievable. Thus, Thomson 4 (#ref4) has suggested for sulphur and nitrogen dioxides that the
concentrations should not exceed 10 µg/m3. The US National Bureau of Standards has made even more stringent
recommendations of less than 1 µg/m3 sulphur dioxide and less than 5 µg/m3 nitrogen dioxide for archival storage
conditions 5 (#ref5) . For the organic pollutants, even less is known, though work by Grzywacz and Tennent 6 (#ref6) has
reported damage to vulnerable materials at levels of 50-100 µg/m3 acetic acid. Clearly, there is scope for more research in
this area, and as yet no hard-and-fast rules can be applied.

Conclusions
From this survey it is apparent that the Tsui display cases were effective at keeping out the inorganic pollutants sulphur
dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. In the two cases examined, the levels were below the limit suggested by Thomson. They were
equally effective at keeping in high levels of internally generated organic chemicals, including the damaging aldehydes and
acids. However, it should be possible to prevent damage by organic compounds by appropriate choice of materials for
display case construction: the avoidance of wood and careful selection of surface coating and sealant compounds.

Future Studies
The AMECP project has a further 18 months to run. In this time we intend to investigate the pollutant levels in a wider
range of museum environments 7 (#ref7) . Display cases of different age; construction materials; contents and lightness of
seal; and storage environments - cupboards, stacks, drawers - will all be examined. In the long-term it is intended to use the
knowledge gained to advise on the types of construction materials to use to avoid damage from internally generated
pollutants.

References
1. Department of Industry (1979), 'Guides to Practice in Corrosion Control', 2. 'Corrosion of Metals by Wood', London:
HMSO.
2. Kadokura, T., Yoshizumi, K., Kahiwagi, M., and Saito, M. (1988) 'Concentration of nitrogen dioxide in the museum
environment and its effects on the fading of dyed fabrics'. In: 'IIC Preprints of the Contributions to the Kyoto Congress', 19-
23 September 1988, 'The Conservation of Far Eastern Art', eds J S Mills, P Smith and K Yamasaki, London: IIC, pp. 87-89.
3. Zinn E., Reilly J.M., Adelstein P.Z. and Nishimura D. W. (1994) 'Air Pollution effects on library microfilms'. In 'IIC
Preprints of the Contributions to the Ottawa Congress', 12-16 September 1994 'Preventive Conservation Practice, Theory
and Research', eds A. Roy and P. Smith, London: IIC, pp. 195-201.
4. Thomson, G. (1986) 'The Museum Environment', 2nd edition, London: Butterworths.
5. National Bureau of Standards (1983) 'Air Quality Criteria for Storage of Paper Based Archival Records', NBSIR 83-2795,
Washington DC: National Bureau of Standards.
6. Grzywacz, C. M. and Tennent, N. H., (1994) 'Pollution monitoring in storage and display cabinets: carbonyl pollution in
relation to artifact deterioration'. In: 'IIC Preprints of the Contributions to the Ottowa Congress', 12-16 September 1994
'Preventive Conservation Practice, Theory and Research', eds A. Roy and P. Smith, London: IIC, pp. 164-170.
7. Brimblecombe, P (1990) 'The composition of museum atmospheres, Atmospheric Environment', 24B (1), pp. 1-8.

http://www.vam.ac.uk/res_cons/conservation/journal/cj14_jan95/pollution/index.html 31/01/2011