Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Understanding electromagnetic
fields and antenna radiation
takes (almost) no math
nderstanding antennas and electromagnet- fend laws without regard to the truth. Even without
U ic fields is obviously important in RF engi- my device, the stray electromagnetic energy from the
neering, in which capturing and propagating power lines is radiated away and lost, so I might as
waves are primary objectives. An understanding of well use it.” The lawyer stands his ground and says
RF fields is also important for dealing with the elec- that the engineer will still be stealing.
tromagnetic-compatibility (EMC) aspects of every Who is right? The lawyer is correct, even though
electronic product, including digital systems. EMC he probably doesn’t know the difference between re-
design is concerned with preventing circuits from active and radiating electromagnetic fields. The field
producing inadvertent electromagnetic radiation surrounding the power lines is a reactive field, mean-
and stray electromagnetic fields. EMC also involves ing that it stores energy as opposed to radiating en-
preventing circuits from misbehaving as a result of ergy, so the engineer’s device would in fact be “steal-
ambient radio waves and fields. With digital systems’ ing” energy from the power lines. But why? Why do
ever-increasing frequencies and edge rates, EMC is some circuits produce fields that only store energy,
becoming harder to achieve and is no longer a top- whereas others produce fields that radiate it?
ic just for experts. The seemingly mystical process-
es by which circuits radiate energy are actually quite THE ENERGY GOES BACK AND FORTH
simple. To understand them, you don’t even need To further examine this situation, consider the cir-
to know Maxwell’s equations. cuit of Figure 1a. It is a simple circuit consisting of
Consider the following fictitious disagreement. an ac power source driving an inductor. If the in-
An electrical engineer is telling a lawyer friend about ductor is ideal, no energy is lost from the power sup-
a new home-electronics project.
The engineer lives near some
high-voltage power lines
Figure 1
and is working on a device
for harnessing the power of the
60-Hz electromagnetic field that
permeates his property. The
lawyer immediately states that
what the engineer plans to do
would, in effect, be stealing from (a) (b)
the utility company.
This statement angers the en- An inductor creates a reactive field that stores energy (a). Adding a second induc-
gineer, who replies, “That’s the tor harnesses the reactive field to transfer energy to a load without metallic con-
trouble with you lawyers. You de- tact (b).
www.ednmag.com March 2, 2000 | edn 77
designfeature Electromagnetic fields
charge, except that the magnitude the length of the wire because both pa-
varies between positive and nega- Figure 7 rameters increase the amount of moving
tive values (Figure 8). charge. The radiation power is also pro-
portional to the frequency because the
RADIATION FROM OSCILLATING CHARGES charge experiences a greater acceleration
Relating frequency to wavelength by at higher frequencies. (Imagine yourself
l5c/f, you can define a slow oscillation on a spinning ride at an amusement
as any frequency whose corresponding park. The faster it spins, the greater the
wavelength is much greater than the acceleration you and your lunch feel.)
length of the wire. This condition is of- Expressed algebraically, Radiated pow-
ten called quasistatic. In this case, the cur- er~current3length3frequency.
rent in the wire varies sinusoidally, and This expression clearly shows why RF
the effective charge experiences a sinu- signals radiate more readily than do low-
soidal acceleration. Consequently, the os- er frequency signals, such as those in the
cillating charge radiates electromagnet- In this depiction of the electric field surround- audio range. In other words, a given cir-
ic energy at frequency fo. The power ing a wire carrying a dc current, shades of gray cuit radiates more at higher frequencies.
(energy per time) radiated is propor- denote the relative voltage levels inside the Because wavelength is inversely propor-
tional to the magnitude of current and wire. Magenta arrows denote the current. tional to frequency (?5c/f), an equiva-
lent expression is: Radiated power~cur- impedance purely real, and the radiation comes negligible. These nonconstant
rent3length/wavelength. pattern is simple (single-lobed) and terms taken together represent the pow-
Hence, at a given source voltage and broad. er in the reactive field.
frequency, the radiated power is propor- The boundary between the near and
tional to the length of the wire. In other NEAR AND FAR FIELD far fields is generally considered to fall at
words, the longer you make an antenna, As mentioned earlier, an ac circuit has about l/(2p). Furthermore, the reactive
the more it radiates. a reactive field and a radiating field. The field typically becomes negligible at dis-
Until now, the discussion has dealt reactive field of an ac source circuit or tances of 3 to 10l. It is interesting to
only with slowly oscillating fields. When system is often called the near field be- compute the boundary at different fre-
you increase the frequency of the voltage cause it is concentrated near the source. quencies. At 60 Hz, the boundary is 833
source so that the wavelength is approx- Similarly, the radiating field is referred to km. Therefore, almost all cases of 60-Hz
imately equal to or less than the length of as the far field because its effects extend interference occur in the near (reactive)
the wire, the quasistatic picture no longer far from the source. Here’s why. field. At 100 MHz, the boundary is 0.5m,
holds true. The current is no longer equal You can represent the power density of making this frequency useful for radio
throughout the length of wire (Figure 9). an electromagnetic field at a distance, r, communication. At 5x1014 Hz (optical
In fact, the current points in different di- from the source by a series in 1/r: waves), the boundary is 0.1 mm, explain-
rections at different locations. These op- Field power density5PD5C1/r21 ing why optical sources such as light
posing currents cause destructive inter- C2/r31C3/r41.... bulbs always appear as radiating sources
ference just as water waves colliding from Now, imagine a sphere with radius, r, and never as reactive sources.
opposite directions tend to cancel each centered at the source. You can calculate The near and far fields have other
other out. The result is that the radiation the total power passing through the sur- characteristics. The shape of the near
is no longer directly proportional to the face of the sphere by multiplying the field is closely related to the structure of
wire or antenna length. power density by the sphere’s surface the source, whereas the far field becomes
Figure 10 shows a plot of radiated area: independent of the source, taking the
power as a function of antenna length. Total power leaving sphere5P5 form of spherical waves. At large dis-
When the antenna is smaller than a wave- (4apr2)PD54p(C11C2/r1C3/r21...). tances, the far field takes the form of trav-
length, the radiated power is roughly When you examine this formula, you eling plane waves. The requirement for
proportional to the length. However, for can see that the first term is purely a con- the plane-wave approximation is
wire lengths near or above a wavelength, stant. For this term, no matter what size r>2(ds1dr)2/l, where ds is the size of the
the radiated power relates as a slowly in- you make the sphere, the same amount source antenna, dr is the size of the re-
creasing and oscillating function. So, why of power flows through it. This result is ceiving antenna, and r is the distance be-
is a length of l/2 usually chosen for di- just a mathematical way of showing that tween the antennas. The wave impedance
pole antennas (l/4 for a monopole)? The power flows away from the source. (ratio of electric- to magnetic-field mag-
“diminishing returns” of the radiated Therefore, the first term is due solely to nitude) of the near field is also a function
power versus wire length partially ex- the radiated field. Also, as r gets large, all of the source circuit, whereas in the far
plain why dipole antennas’ length is usu- the other terms become negligible, leav- field, the wave impedance, h, depends
ally chosen to be less than a wavelength). ing only the radiated term. Conversely, at only on the medium (h5377V in free
The length of l/2 is chosen because at close distances (small values of r), the space). Figure 11 graphs the wave im-
this wavelength, the antenna is electri- nonconstant terms become much larg- pedance as a function of distance. Table
cally resonant, which makes its electrical er, and the constant radiating term be- 1 summarizes the field characteristics.
Figure 8 Figure 9
(a) (b)
(a) (b)
The electric field surrounding a wire carries a rapidly varying ac
The electric fields surrounding a wire carry a slowly varying ac current. Magen- current. Magenta arrows denote the current, and shades of gray
ta arrows denote the current, and shades of gray denote the relative voltage denote the relative voltage levels inside the wire at time t50
levels inside the wire at time t50 (a) and at time t5T/2, a half-cycle later (b). (a) and at time t5T/2, a half-cycle later (b).
References
1. Feynman, R, R Leighton, and M
Sands, The Feynman Lectures on Physics,
Addison-Wesley, 1963.
2. Epstein, L, Thinking Physics—Is WAVE IMPEDANCE
Gedanken Physics; Practical Lessons in (V)
Critical Thinking, Second Edition, Insight
Press, 1989.
3. Marion, J and M Heald, Classical
Electromagnetic Radiation, Second Edi-
tion, Academic Press, 1980.
4. Eisberg, R and R Resnick, Quantum
Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei,
and Particles, Second Edition, John Wiley DISTANCE FROM ANTENNA
& Sons, 1985. (WAVELENGTHS)
5. Baylis, W, Electrodynamics, A Mod-
ern Geometric Approach. Birkhaeuser, Compare the wave impedance as a function of distance from a loop antenna (as in Figure 3a) with
1999. that of a dipole (as in Figure 3b). In the near field, the loop antenna’s radiated energy is mostly
6. Jackson, J, Classical Electrodynamics, magnetic. At close range, the dipole antenna’s radiated energy is mostly electric. In the far field,
Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1975. the division between electric and magnetic energy is the same for both antenna types.
7. Ramo, S, J Whinnery, T VanDuzer,
Fields and Waves in Communication Elec- Van Nostrand Reinhold Co, 1988. and products. Recently, he has worked on
tronics, Second Edition, John Wiley & 11. Bansal, Rajeev,“The far-field: How 315- and 915-MHz surface-acoustic-wave
Sons, 1984. far is far enough?” Applied Microwave & (SAW) oscillators for polymer-coated SAW
8. Georgi, H, “A unified theory of ele- Wireless, November 1999. chemical sensors. He has a BSEE from Cor-
mentary particles and forces”, Scientific nell University (Ithaca, NY) and an MSEE
American, April 1981. Author’s bio graphy from the University of Pennsylvania
9. Paul, C, Introduction to Electromag- Ron Schmitt is the director of electrical en- (Philadelphia). He is currently a PhD can-
netic Compatibility, John Wiley & Sons, gineering support for Sensor Research and didate at the University of Maine (Orono,
1992. Development Corp (Orono, ME), where he ME). He enjoys sports and traveling with
10. Lo, Y and S Lee, Antenna Hand- manages the group responsible for elec- his wife, Kim. You can reach Ron Schmitt
book—Theory, Applications, and Design, tronics design for chemical-sensor research at rschmitt@srdcorp.com.
88 edn | March 2, 2000 www.ednmag.com