You are on page 1of 1

www.catalyst.

org

Making Mentoring Work


By Catalyst

M
Mentoring is a simple idea that can have powerful to mentor those who “look like” themselves.1 And because
effects. The impact and potential benefits of formal mentor- white men dominate top positions in most organizations,
ing programs—those in which organizations match mentors women and people of color lose out.
and mentees, designate minimum time commitments, moni- Formal mentoring programs can redress the lack of nat-
tor relationships, and evaluate the program—can span entire urally occurring informal relationships. Proper design and
careers. A common misperception about formal mentoring is implementation make them effective. Success results when
that it doesn’t work—that it cannot provide the benefits of mentoring is tied directly to an organization’s business needs
informal mentoring relationships. But this simply isn’t true. and assessed through a structured system of metrics that the
Formal mentoring relationships can be effective. And the good organization identifies and develops based on its particular re-
news is that savvy organizations can avoid common pitfalls quirements. For example, assessing the diversity of individuals
with the right knowledge and tools. in mentoring pairs will help organizations ensure that a greater
In Making Mentoring Work, Catalyst debunks the notion number of pairs benefit from diverse perspectives. Metrics can
that informal mentoring is “good enough” and illustrates that and should be gathered from a variety of sources, including
formal mentoring programs are an important talent manage- employee surveys, interviews, and focus groups.
ment strategy. It shows that organizations that embrace formal While the concept of formal mentoring is not new,
mentoring gain a competitive advantage by leveraging and the ways in which smart companies conceptualize, track,
tracking those mentoring relationships. This results in the and leverage these programs is constantly evolving. Utilizing
promotion and development of the best talent culled from formal mentoring programs to help employees gain job com-
the full talent pool that is inclusive of all women and men petencies, expose them to others in the organization, or help
employees, as well as people of color. Ultimately, it enhances a prepare them for expanded job responsibilities can improve
company’s bottom line by putting the best people in charge. employees’ satisfaction and the organization’s bench strength.
Our research has found that lack of mentoring opportu- By ensuring that career development offerings include
nities is frequently a barrier to advancement for women and mentoring efforts, practitioners can better leverage these
people of color. Also, women encounter gender-based barriers important workplace relationships.2 The bottom line is that
that keep them from enjoying the full benefits of informal smart companies cannot afford to lose talent and thus cannot
mentoring. Women often have decreased access to poten- risk leaving mentoring to chance. PDJ
tial mentors, are less successful in finding mentors willing to
invest in their career development, and receive fewer benefits
from mentoring relationships than men do. Founded in 1962, Catalyst is the leading nonprofit membership organization
working globally with businesses and the professions to build inclusive workplaces
Talented employees with decreased access to influential and expand opportunities for women and business. With offices in the United
mentors often fall behind. Women, women of color, and men States, Canada, and Europe, and more than 400 preeminent corporations as
members, Catalyst is the trusted resource for research, information, and advice
of color are especially vulnerable. Senior leaders—individuals about women at work. Catalyst annually honors exemplary organizational
whose experiences and positions make them a source of sage initiatives that promote women’s advancement with the Catalyst Award.
Visit www.catalyst.org/page/82/catalyst-e-newsletters to begin receiving
advice and introductions to influential others—often choose Catalyst C-News, our e-newsletter.

1 Erik H. Erikson, Childhood and Society, 2nd ed. (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1963).
2 Tammy D. Allen, Lillian T. Eby, and Elizabeth Lentz, “The Relationship between Formal Mentoring Program Characteristics and Perceived Program
Effectiveness,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 59, no. 1 (Spring 2006): p. 125-153; Belle Rose Ragins, John L. Cotton, and Janice S. Miller, “Marginal Mentor-
ing: The Effects of Type of Mentor, Quality of Relationship, and Program Design on Work and Career Attitudes,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 43,
no. 6 (December 2000): p. 1177-1194.

8 Pro f i les i n D i versit y Journal M aY / J u n e 2 0 1 0

You might also like