Sensors 2010, 10, 3597-3610; doi:10.

3390/s100403597
OPEN ACCESS

sensors
ISSN 1424-8220
www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors

Article

Flexible Temperature Sensor Array Based on a

Graphite-Polydimethylsiloxane Composite
Wen-Pin Shih *, Li-Chi Tsao, Chian-Wen Lee, Ming-Yuan Cheng, Chienliu Chang,
Yao-Joe Yang and Kuang-Chao Fan

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan;

E-Mails: r94522525@ntu.edu.tw (L.-C.T.); r96522514@ntu.edu.tw (C.-W.L.);
mingyuan@mems.me.ntu.edu.tw (M.-Y.C.); clchang6@ntu.edu.tw (C.C.); yjy@ntu.edu.tw (Y.-J.Y.);
fan@ntu.edu.tw (K.-C.F.)

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: wpshih@ntu.edu.tw;

Tel.: +886-2-3366-4511; Fax: +886-2-2363-1755.

Received: 12 January 2010; in revised form: 12 March 2010 / Accepted: 20 March 2010 /
Published: 9 April 2010

Abstract: This paper presents a novel method to fabricate temperature sensor arrays by
dispensing a graphite-polydimethylsiloxane composite on flexible polyimide films. The
fabricated temperature sensor array has 64 sensing cells in a 4 × 4 cm2 area. The sensor
array can be used as humanoid artificial skin for sensation system of robots. Interdigitated
copper electrodes were patterned on the flexible polyimide substrate for determining the
resistivity change of the composites subjected to ambient temperature variations.
Polydimethylsiloxane was used as the matrix. Composites of different graphite volume
fractions for large dynamic range from 30 ºC to 110 ºC have been investigated. Our
experiments showed that graphite powder provided the composite high temperature
sensitivity. The fabricated temperature sensor array has been tested. The detected
temperature contours are in good agreement with the shapes and magnitudes of different
heat sources.

Keywords: composite; temperature sensor array; flexible substrate

Sensors 2010, 10 3598

1. Introduction

Recently, intensive efforts have been taken to develop sensing systems for intelligent robots. One of
the focuses on this subject is the design and fabrication of humanoid artificial skin. The successful
implementation of artificial skin relies on the improvement of its sensitivity and mechanical flexibility.
Most investigations of artificial skin emphasize the touch or tactile sensing to imitate the somatic sense
of real human skin. Tajima et al. [1] developed a multi-layer touch sensor integrated with soft
materials by microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology. Engel et al. [2] and Someya et al.
[3] presented soft and flexible tactile sensor arrays for robotic applications. As a matter of fact, the
sensory functions of human skin include not only the touch sensation but also pressure, temperature,
pain, or other compound reactions from receptors and nerve endings. In the development of more
sophisticated skin-like sensing systems, Siegel et al. [4] mounted 8  8 force sensing cells and 4  4
temperature sensors in a stacked rigid substrate, which was then implemented on a robot finger. Their
temperature sensors are based on detecting heat loss due to ambient temperature variations. To develop
flexible sensor array, Someya et al. [5] fabricated networks of pressure and thermal sensors using
active matrices of organic transistors. Han et al. [6] employed platinum microresistors to form a
one-dimensional flexible temperature sensor array. Temperature sensing systems have yet to become
more commonplace in the field of robotic sensation. Besides Someya et al.’s work [5], reports about
large arrays of temperature sensors on flexible substrate are still very rare.
The development of a flexible sensor array relies on an appropriate sensing mechanism and a
suitable large-area fabrication technique. Our preliminary study showed that a polymer dielectric filled
with conductive particles could be a good candidate to provide both mechanical flexibility and
temperature sensitivity to the sensor array [7]. When the volume fraction of conductive particles inside
a polymer dielectric approaches a percolation threshold, the electrical resistivity of the composite
dramatically drops. This is because the number of the conductive particles reaches a critical value at
which some “electrical pathways” are formed in the polymer matrix [8]. The associated material model
is based on general effective media theory and has been intensively studied [9-12]. The electrical
resistivity of the conductor-polymer composite could change significantly in response to mechanical
stress or temperature variations. In theory, conductive fillers with suitable conductivity and aspect
ratio can make the electrical resistivity of the composite sensitive to temperature changes [11].
Although the piezoresistivity of similar composites subjected to external stresses has been extensively
studied [11,13-18], the temperature response and associated sensor development have not been reported.
In this paper, we investigate the resistivity-temperature characteristics of a graphite-
polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) composite. A bending test is also conducted to verify the resistivity
response of the composite. To fabricate a sensor array based on the investigated carbon-polymer
composites, we demonstrate a mass production process which employs an automatic dispensing system
that is used to apply the composites onto a flexible circuit board. The function of the fabricated
flexible sensor array will be shown.

2. Materials

In this work, electro-resistive polymer is used as the temperature sensitive material. This material is
made of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with graphite powder which serves as the conductive filler.
Sensors 2010, 10 3599

Carbon particles are commonly used as conducting fillers because of their high receivability, low cost,
and simple fabrication. For fabricating sensor arrays using micromachining techniques, PDMS is
commonly used as the polymer matrix for its simplicity in the fabrication process and its high chemical
stability [19,20]. Although the temperature sensors will be fabricated on polyimide substrate which is
commercially available, the control of residual stress in polyimide is still under investigations [21-24].
Therefore, polyimide is not used as the polymer matrix. The PDMS matrix is SYLGARD® 184 from
Dow Corning, and its specific gravity is 1.03 kg/m3 at 25 ºC. The mixing ratio of curing agent and
prepolymer is 1:10 in weight. The thermal conductivity and volume resistivity of the PDMS matrix
are 0.18 W/m-K and 1.2  1014 Ω-cm, respectively. Hence the PDMS matrix is intrinsically a good
heat and electric insulation material. The advantages of using PDMS as the insulation matrix also
include its high durability, low fabrication temperature, and simple fabrication process.
In order to make the insulation matrix conductive, we interfused conductive fillers such as carbon
black (Ketjen Black EC300J), graphite powder (Sigma-Aldrich No.15553), carbon nano-fibers (Showa
Denko VGCF®-H) into PDMS. The temperature sensitivity of the composites based on these three
different conductive fillers was evaluated separately. The image taken with a scanning electron
microscope (SEM) in Figure 1(a) indicates that the mean diameter of the graphite powder is about 10 μm
and that the shape is irregular. It is worth mentioning that the electrical conductivity of polymer-graphite
composites would increase with mean diameter of the graphite [25]. The cross-sectional SEM image of
a graphite-PDMS composite is shown in Figure 1(b).

Figure 1. SEM images of (a) graphite powder and (b) a graphite-PDMS composite.

Figure 2(a) shows the carbon black inside the PDMS matrix. These carbon black particles have the
original diameter of 30–35 nm and aggregate easily without careful dispersion during mixing process.
These aggregated carbon black particles induce electrical instability when the composites are subjected
to temperature variations. Carbon nano-fibers were also mixed with PDMS for comparison, as shown
in Figure 2(b). It was found that the resistivity of such composites barely changes with temperature
variations. In such composites, large aspect ratio of carbon nano-fibers results in multi-conductive
networks in insulating PDMS. Even though the connection of a few conducting paths would be broken
during thermal expansion, most of the carbon nano-fiber network remains when the ambient
temperature increases. Comparing to carbon black and carbon nano-fibers, we have found that graphite
Sensors 2010, 10 3600

powder as the conductive-filler could provide much higher temperature sensitivity of the
electro-resistive PDMS.

Figure 2. SEM images of (a) carbon black in PDMS and (b) carbon nano-fibers in PDMS.

We fabricated the composites of different volume fractions of the graphite powder in PDMS to
determine the percolation threshold. The resistivity of these composites was measured, as given in
Figure 3(a). For each volume fraction of the composite, we measured the resistivity of 25 samples. The
error bar shows the maximum and the minimum value of the measurement.
For each volume concentration, the resistivity variation is mainly caused by the non-uniformity of
the composite. Therefore, independent calibration is required for the composite to be used for
sensor applications.
Figure 3(a) indicates that the percolation threshold occurs between 12% and 25% of the graphite
volume fraction. The measured resistivity of the samples with 25% volume fraction shows wider range,
which implied poorer uniformity of the composite. This is because the high viscosity of the
graphire/PDMS mixture makes it difficult to disperse graphite powder uniformly. The resistivity of the
composite could be further decreased if the volume fraction of graphite is greater than 25%. However,
the composite becomes very difficult to dispense due to the high viscosity.
The resistivity of graphite/PDMS and carbon nano-fiber/PDMS composites can be compared in
Figure 3(b). For materials in nanometer scale, it is more common to describe the amount by weight.
Hence the concentration in Figure 3(b) is shown by the weight percentage of the conductive filler to
the composite. Comparing to graphite, it requires less amount of carbon nano-fiber for the composite
to reach percolation region. This is because the carbon nano-fiber has much higher aspect ratio.
Sensors 2010, 10 3601

Figure 3. (a) Percolation threshold of graphite/PDMS composites. (b) Resistivity of

graphite/PDMS and carbon nano-fiber/PDMS composites at different weight percentage of
the conductive fillers.

3. Design and Fabrication

The flexible substrate of our temperature sensor array is comprised of copper electrodes, wires, and
polyimide insulation layers. The copper interconnects are patterned with these layers to form a
complete scanning circuitry. The details of the scanning circuit can be found in [26,27]. The
interdigitated electrodes are designed upon the insulation layer, and the electro-resistive PDMS is
applied on these electrodes by an automatic dispensing system. The resistance of the sensing material
changes immediately with the ambient temperature variation, and signals can be detected by the
scanning circuitry.
To fabricate the temperature sensor array, the graphite-PDMS composite must be prepared
beforehand. The conductive filler, graphite powder, together with dispersant was blended into PDMS
prepolymer at the first step. A dispersant such as cyclohexane increases the fluidity of the PDMS
prepolymer and improves the mixture uniformity through the blending procedure. The blending
Sensors 2010, 10 3602

procedure included ultrasonic mixing and stirring steps and was conducted for 30 minutes. Then the
PDMS curing agent was well mixed into the composite. We degassed all the mixture in a vacuum
chamber for 30 minutes to evaporate the volatile cyclohexane. In this step, we did not observe any
migration of the graphite caused by the gravity. The process for applying the unpolymerized sensing
material onto the flexible printed circuit is depicted in Figure 4. The composite was put into a
dispensing machine to be selectively applied on the designated interdigitated copper electrodes, as
shown in Figure 4(b). This automatic dispensing system is an SR-300D from Homytech Auto Part Co.,
Taiwan. It has a minimum motion step of 50 μm and is therefore capable of addressing
high-resolution sensor arrays. By controlling the three-axis movement platform of the dispensing
system, the graphite-PDMS composite can be well aligned with the pattern of the sensing electrodes.
The transferring and dispensing steps took less than 10 minutes. Due to the high viscosity of the
mixture, the uniformity of the volume fraction could not be affected. There are 64 sensing electrodes
distributed over a 4 × 4 cm2 area, and the dimension of each interdigitated electrode is 1.5 × 1.5 mm2.
Hence the volume of the graphite-PDMS composite on each sensing electrode could constantly be kept small.

Figure 4. Process flow for fabricating the temperature sensor array. (a) Flexible printed
circuit. (b) Applying graphite/PDMS composite on the interdigitated electrode. (c)
Applying a flat plate coated with Teflon to flatten the composite. (d) Curing the composite
and then removing the plate.

The graphite-PDMS composite becomes more viscous as the volume fraction of the graphite
powder increases. The volume fraction of the conductive fillers must be robust for adequate electrical
resistance and manufacture feasibility. The graphite-PDMS is dispensed at room temperature to avoid
the dispenser from clogging up over time. The PDMS curing time at room temperature is much longer
than the time, which is about ten minutes, for dispensing the composite on 64 electrodes [28]. To
overcome the high viscosity of the graphite-PDMS composite, a constant pressure of 294 kPa is
applied to dispense the composite. When the automatic dispensing system moves up and down, it will
cause sharp tips of residue PDMS as shown in Figure 4 (c) and Figure 5 (a). The composite sticks to
the copper and the substrate very well without any modifications on the polyimide surface. These
sharp tips will cause non-uniform contact between heat source and every single sensor cells, resulting
in inaccurate temperature contour of the sensor array in practical implementation. To eliminate these
sharp tips, we pressed the sensor array with a thin flat plate, on which the surface energy has been
Sensors 2010, 10 3603

reduced by Teflon coating, as shown in Figure 4(c) and Figure 5(b). Then we put the sensor array on a
hotplate and cured the PDMS at 80 ºC for 8 hours to completely evaporate the cyclohexane solvent.
Finally, we removed the flat plate, as shown in Figure 4(d). The fabricated temperature sensor array
exhibits good flexibility, as shown in Figure 6. The insets show the sensing electrode and an electrode
covered with the composite, respectively.

Figure 5. (a) The viscosity of the graphite-PDMS composite results in a sharp tip on each
sensor cell during the dispensing process. (b) A thin flat plate coated with Teflon is used to
flatten all sensor cells.

Figure 6. Fabricated flexible temperature sensor array. The insets show the interdigitated
electrode and composites on the electrode, respectively.

4. Experiments and Discussion

PDMS with three different volume fractions of graphite powder (15% and 25%) were chosen to
determine the resistance variations by altering temperature on a hotplate in an air atmosphere. These
volume fractions were chosen for higher temperature sensitivity as they are in the range of the
percolation threshold. After degassing and curing, the sheets of the graphite-PDMS composites were cut
into 1 × 1 cm2 pieces and then sandwiched by copper plates. The thickness of these PDMS sheets was
fixed at 0.5 mm by using a scraper before polymerization. The copper plates were connected to a
Sensors 2010, 10 3604

multimeter for resistance measurement while the temperature on the composite sheets was increased
from 25 ºC to 110 ºC on the hotplate. Before each measurement, the temperature was increased by 5 ºC
and then maintained as a constant for 10 minutes to assure thermal equilibrium between testing sample
and hotplate. The relative humidity of the testing environment was maintained at 60%. Figure 7 shows
the measured resistance variation of the graphite-PDMS composites subjected to different temperature.
Platinum thin film as a temperature sensor was also characterized for comparison. The temperature
coefficient of resistance (TCR) can be calculated by:
R / R0
 (1)
T  T0
where T0 is the ambient temperature, and R0 is the initial resistance of tested sample. Equation (1) is
used to extract the TCRs in our experiment. The fitting curves are shown as the dashed lines in
Figure 7.

Figure 7. Measured resistance change of the graphite-PDMS composites subjected to

different temperature values. The volume fractions of the graphite powder in the
composites are 15% and 25%, respectively.

The experimental results agree with the linear model. According to the data, the platinum TCR is
determined to be 0.0055 K-1. The TCRs of the composites are 0.042 K-1 and 0.286 K-1 for the graphite
volume fractions of 25% and 15%, respectively. The testing results indicate that the sensitivity of the
graphite-PDMS composites is higher than that of typical platinum temperature sensors [29]. Although
the uniformity of the graphite-PDMS composites still has to be improved, these composites have been
demonstrated to have potential applications in automatic or robotic systems. Prominent increase of
resistance in these composites is also observed as the volume fraction of graphite powder decreases.
However, the sensation range also drops with decreasing volume fraction. For the 15% volume
fraction, the temperature sensing polymer becomes insulating when the temperature is greater than 40
ºC. The thermal expansion of the PDMS could break contact between graphite particles in the
Sensors 2010, 10 3605

composite [30]. Because the sample of 15% volume fraction is close to the lower bound of the
percolation region as shown in Figure 3(a), all the conductive paths in the composite are broken at
over 40 ºC. Therefore, this temperature sensing polymer is suitable to be a switch apparatus for
protecting objects from high temperature sources because of its sharp increase in resistance. The
experimental result in Figure 7 implies that the 25% volume fraction composite has lower TCR than
the 15% volume fraction composite. More rigorous experiment is required for fully understanding the
TCRs of this composite in the future.
The flexibility of the fabricated sensing composite with 20% volume fraction of graphite powder
has been characterized. In this test, the sensing composite in 1 cm2 area was sandwiched by a
conductive copper tape and a conductive carbon tape on the flexible printed circuit board, as shown
in Figure 8.

Figure 8. The sensing composite in 1 cm2 area was sandwiched between a conductive
copper tape and a conductive carbon tape on a flexible printed circuit board. Its resistance
was then measured on steel rods of different diameters. (a) Photograph of the bending test.
(b) Side-view illustration.

The configuration in Figure 8(b) is to shift the material away from the neutral axis so that the
material can be completely under tensile stress. The sensing composite was then wrapped around steel
rods, and its resistance change was measured. The steel rods have different curvature radii from 2 mm
to 10 mm with 1 mm increment. The testing results in Figure 9 indicate that the resistance decreases
with the radius of curvature. This is because the composite was put at the convex side in the test and
hence was subjected to tensile stress. The tensile stress stretches the composite laterally, causing the
thickness to decrease. Thinner composite has smaller resistance. This bending test implies that the
Sensors 2010, 10 3606

sensing signal of the composite could be affected by external stress. To remove the bending effect, one
can simply put the composite close to the neutral axis by change the thickness ratio of the material to
the substrate.

Figure 9. The measured resistance of the sensing composite increases with increasing
bending radius of curvature.

The fabricated temperature sensor array of 20% volume fraction of graphite powder was connected
to the scanning circuits for full-function evaluation. At room temperature, the resistance varies
randomly between 1.43 MΩ and 1.76 MΩ across the sensor array. For easy observation, a 4  4
resistance map of the array is shown in Figure 10.

Figure 10. A 4  4 resistance map of the fabricated sensor array.

The resistance variation could be due to the thickness and shape non-uniformity since they were
controlled by applying the thin plate for flattening all sensor cells. Nevertheless, measurement
uniformity could be achieved by conducting independent calibration of each sensor cell. We also
Sensors 2010, 10 3607

improved the performance uniformity of the sensor array by adjusting scanning circuit program. Then
heat sources with different shapes were applied 5 mm above the temperature sensor array. The heated
ring is made of iron wire. The heat rod is soldering iron. The heated plate is made of bulk aluminum.
The temperature increase is successfully detected by each sensor cell, and the overall temperature is
displayed by the contour map shown in Figure 11. These contours are in well agreement with the
shapes and temperature scales of the applied heat sources. The non-uniform temperature distribution
could be caused by the heat source, background noise, or ambient fluctuations.

Figure 11. Measured temperature distributions of the fabricated sensor array subjected to
different heat sources. (a) Heated ring. (b) Heated rod. (c) Heated rectangular plate.

5. Conclusions

A flexible temperature sensor array consists of a graphite-PDMS composite, metal sensing

electrodes, and flexible polyimide film has been successfully fabricated. There are 8 × 8 sensor cells in
Sensors 2010, 10 3608

a 4 × 4 cm2 area with good flexibility and robustness. Our experiment shows that polymer mixed with
conductive fillers exhibits resistance variation when it is subjected to ambient temperature change.
Graphite powders mixed with PDMS is found to have the highest temperature sensitivity and higher
stability compared with the composites using other carbon fillers. As the volume fraction of graphite
powders reaches the percolation threshold, the resistivity of the composites drops substantially.
Different volume fractions of graphite powders have been investigated. The composite with 15%
graphite powder are suitable for on/off devices while the one with 20% graphite powder provides
sufficient dynamic range for continuously sensing temperature changes. The function of the fabricated
temperature array has been verified through a resistance scanning system. The detected temperature
contours agree well with the shape and magnitude of the applied heat source. An automatic dispensing
method has been developed to fabricate this temperature sensor array. Larger sensor array can be
easily achieved using the same process for robotic applications.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan with the grant number NSC
97-2221-E-002-162-MY3.

References and Notes

1. Tajima R.; Kagami, S.; Inaba, M.; Inoue, H. Development of soft and distributed tactile sensors
and the application to humanoid robot. Adv. Robot. 2002, 16, 381-397.
2. Engel, J.; Chen, J.; Liu, C. Development of polyimide flexible tactile sensor skin. J. Micromech.
Microeng. 2003, 13, 359-366.
3. Someya, T; Sekitani, T; Iba, S.; Kato, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Sakurai, T. A large-area, flexible
pressure sensor matrix with organic field-effect transistors for artificial skin applications. Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 9966-9970.
4. Siegel, D.; Garabieta, I.; Hollerbach, J.M. An integrated tactile and thermal sensor. In
Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), San
Francisco, CA, USA, 1986; pp.1286-1291.
5. Someya, T.; Kato, Y.; Sekitani, T.; Iba, S.; Noguchi, Y.; Murase, Y.; Kawaguchi, H.; Sakurai, T.
Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor
active matrixes. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12321-12325.
6. Engel, J.M.; Chen, J.; Bullen, D.; Liu C. Polyurethane rubber as a MEMS material:
Characterization and demonstration of an all-polymer two-axis hair cell flow sensor. In
Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems
(MEMS), Miami, FL, USA, 2005; pp. 279-282.
7. Tsao, L.-C.; Cheng, M.-Y.; Chen, I.-L.; Shih, W.-P.; Yang, Y.-J.; Chang, F.-Y.; Fan, K.-C.;
Chang, S.-H. Flexible temperature sensor array using electro-resistive polymer for humanoid
artificial skin. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Solid-State Sensors,
Actuators and Microsystems (Transducers), Lyon, France, 2007; pp. 2287-2290.
Sensors 2010, 10 3609

8. Han, J.-S.; Tan, Z.-Y.; Sato, K.; Shikida, M. Thermal characterization of micro heater arrays on a
polyimide film substrate for fingerprint sensing applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2005, 15,
282-289.
9. Hussain, M.; Choa, Y.-H.; Niihara, K. Fabrication process and electrical behavior of novel
pressure-sensitive composites. Composites Part A 2001, 32, 1689-1696.
10. Sherman, R.D.; Middleman, L.M.; Jacobs, S.M. Electron transport process in conductor-filled
polymers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 1983, 23, 36-46.
11. Lundberg, B.; Sundqvist, B. Resistivity of a composite conducting polymer as a function of
temperature, pressure, and environment: Applications as a pressure and gas concentration
transducer. J. Appl. Phys. 1986, 60, 1074-1079.
12. McLachlan, D.S.; Blaszkiewicz, M.; Newnham, R.E. Electrical resistivity of composites. J. Am.
Ceram. Soc. 1990, 73, 2187-2203.
13. Wang, L.; Ding, T.; Wang, P. Effects of conductive phase content on critical pressure of carbon
black filled silicone rubber composite. Sens. Actuat. A 2007, 135, 587-592.
14. Wang, S.L.; Wang, P.; Ding, T.H. Development of wireless compressive/relaxation-stress
measurement system integrated with pressure-sensitive carbon black-filled silicon rubber-based
sensors. Sens. Actuators A 2010, 157, 36-41.
15. Arshak, K.; Morris, D.; Arshak. A.; Korostynska, O.; Moore, E. PVB, PVAc and PS pressure
sensors with interdigitated electrodes. Sens. Actuat. A 2010, 132, 36-41.
16. Job, A.E.; Oliveira, F.A.; Alves, N.; Giacometti, J.A.; Mattoso L.H.C. Conductive composites of
natural rubber and carbon black for pressure sensors. Synth. Met. 2003, 135, 99-100.
17. Lei, H.; Pitt, W.G.; McGrath, L.K.; Ho, C.K. Modeling carbon black/polymer composite sensors.
Sens. Actuat. A 2007, 125, 396-407.
18. Edmiston, J.; Shjel, Y. Piezoresistance in liquid suspensions: graphite in silicone elastomer.
Philos. Mag. 2007, 87, 2461-2481.
19. Lötters, J.C.; Olthuis, W.; Veltink, P.H.; Bergveld, P. The mechanical properties of the rubber
elastic polymer polydimethylsiloxane for sensor applications. J. Micromech. Microeng. 1997, 7,
145-147.
20. Schneider, F.; Fellner, T.; Wilde, J.; Wallrabe U. Mechanical properties of silicones for MEMS. J.
Micromech. Microeng. 2008, 18, 068008.
21. Jang, W.; Seo, J.; Lee, C.; Paek, S.H.; Han, H. Residual stress and mechanical properties of
polyimide thin films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 976-983.
22. Yoo, D.K.; Shim, S.J.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, D. Residual stress behavior of
polyimide thin films: Effect of precursors. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2005, 38, 615-622.
23. Chung, H.; Joe, Y.I.; Han, H. Effects of thickness on the residual stress behavior of high
temperature polyimide films. Polym. J. 2000, 32, 215-221.
24. Elsner, G. Residual-stress and thermal-expansion of spun-on polyimide films. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.
1987, 34, 815-828.
25. Nagata, K.; Iwabuki, H.; Nigo, H. Effect of particle size of graphites on electrical conductivity of
graphite/polymer composite. Compos. Interfaces 1998, 6, 483-495.
Sensors 2010, 10 3610

26. Yang, Y.-J.; Cheng, M.-Y.; Shih, S.-C.; Huang, X.-H.; Tsao, C.-M.; Chang, F.-Y.; Fan, K.-C. A
32x32 temperature and tactile sensing array using PI-copper films. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.
2010, 46, 945-956.
27. Yang, Y.-J.; Cheng, M.-Y.; Chang W.-Y.; Tsao, L.-C.; Yang, S.-A.; Shih, W.-P.; Chang, E.-Y.;
Chang, S.-H.; Fan, K.-C. An integrated flexible temperature and tactile sensing array using
PI-copper films. Sens. Actuat. A 2008, 143, 143-153.
28. Liu, M.; Sun, J.; Chen, Q. Influences of heating temperature on mechanical properties of
polydimethylsiloxane. Sens. Actuat. A 2009, 151, 42-45.
29. Chia, B.T.; Chang, D.-R.; Liao, H.-H.; Yang Y.-J.; Shih, W.-P.; Chang, F.-Y.; Fan, K.-C.
Temperature sensor array using flexible substrate. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International
Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Kobe, Japan, 2007; pp. 589-592.
30. Zheng, C.; Fan, Z.; Wei, T.; Luo, G. Temperature dependence of the conductivity behavior of
graphite nanoplatelet-filled epoxy resin composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 113, 1515-1519.

© 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland.
This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).