You are on page 1of 3

It is interesting how the Bible equates creativity with bad behavior and pain.

The
whole childbirth thing is the basic creative act of life and the Bible says it always stems
from "original sin" and is to forever be associated with pain and danger to the mother. All
womankind is "cursed" in Genesis Chapter three and cities are said to be founded in sin
and the pain of dislocation in the very next chapter.

Genesis Chapter 4 verses 11-17 can be interpreted as cities being created as a


direct result of God's punishment of Cain for killing his brother, Abel. In verse 11 God
"curses" Cain from the earth. In verse 12 God tells Cain the earth will no longer yield
sustenance to him. Later in the story, after Cain's lamentations and a subsequent
modification of the punishment decree, Cain, in verse 17 knocks up his wife, has a son
and builds a city.

Cain was never much of a hunter and now, under the terms of the modified
punishment decree, that he could no longer be a farmer, founding a city seemed like the
only recourse left him to live and provide for his family. So, cities, it has been
interpreted, were, like the pain of childbirth, born of sin and punishment and will forever
require painful relocations.

Sounds about right, when you think about it. Jane Jacobs, and boodles of other
urban theorists, think the only on going rationale for the continued existence of cities, or
a city, is the city's unique ability to foster creative ferment. Cities, it is thought,
accomplish this fomenting of creative ferment by allowing the close proximity of vast
numbers of folk, each with at least a slightly different point of view. The continuous and
unavoidable, clashing of all these points of view force folk to look anew at settled issues
and, thereby, now and again experience creative revelations.

At the base of all the theories related to urban existence, is the notion that this
primordial stew of creative impulse is the bedrock and foundation of it all. Cities have a
working business model because they are constantly reinventing themselves
economically, politically, artistically, industrially and so forth. Cities are not only doing
this because of the primordial stew, the existence of the primordial stew allows cities to
do this reinventing faster and with greater efficiency than is possible in other forms of
human habitation.

While I cannot prove it to be true, I do believe this theory is correct. I confess that
I have never come across anything I believe to be a fact based conclusive proof of the
theory. Never the less, it is one of those things that seem so self evident that the resulting
sensation of self evidence is often taken for proof. It becomes a belief so strongly felt it is
accepted as fact.

Now comes evidence in the form of everything from the first Presidential
campaign of Howard Dean, to massive pillow fights in San Francisco to revolutions
throughout the Islamic world that the world may have found a means of expanding the
primordial stew far beyond the city's boundaries. Social media inhabiting the internet has
demonstrated it has the power to reach into, between, across, through, around and beyond
cities to foment ferment, as it were.

It is thought that the world wide web, for the first time, gives huge, indeed,
unlimited, numbers of creative types the practical option of living outside of a city
without sacrificing access to the primordial stew so important to creative thought and
action. Cities, it has been said, are only one or two atomic bombs exploded at the hands
of terrorists or a really healthy and vigorous pandemic/plague from becoming a failed
economic model. Should either, or both, occur, all people who can abandon cities will do
so. More importantly, the annual spring and summer flood of young people relocating to
cities to escape the drudgery of wherever they grew up will dry up to a trickle.

In the past, such young people seeking a better more meaningful life had no
choice but to cast their fortunes with some city somewhere. Now, it is thought by some,
the world wide web offers a viable alternative. An amicable social life, even for the most
perverse among us, can be found by working the web. In the past, no matter how
modestly bend and twisted one might be, a satisfactory social life outside a major
metropolitan area could prove problematic. Now days, the pervert just down the lane or
in the village across the valley can be discretely identified to the happiness and
fulfillment of all concerned.

Likewise other Iunctian enthusiasts littering the countryside can be easily


identified by another of their kind and summoned for periodic conversation, consultation
and argument concerning the many and varied concepts relating to the Theory of
Perpetual Tides. Oh joy!

Aside from the discomfort the destruction of hundreds of millions of humans


caused by terrorists' nuclear weapons and/or plague, the creative community need not be
bothered by the demise of cities as long as the satellite up links and down links and the
connections in between continue to function. As long as the web remains in operation, all
human knowledge is available at the click of a button. And the ability to share that
knowledge, opine upon it, argue about it, add to it or disprove some or all of it, etc. and to
broadcast those new "proofs" also remains in tact. If this be so, the primary function of
cities, to foment creative ferment, is no longer an exclusive monopoly. Anybody,
anywhere can play. Maybe it is time Cain returned home, back to the earth.

You might also like