Professional Documents
Culture Documents
clamped-free: c=0.25
pinned-pinned: c=1
clamped-pinned: c=2
clamped-clamped: c=4
Pcr π 2 EI π 2E
σ cr = =c 2 =c 2
A L A L (A/ I)
π 2E
Equation becomes σ cr = c 2 2 . So finally we write the
L (1/ ρ )
Euler critical buckling stress as:
π 2E
σE = c
( L / ρ) 2
For very short columns (small L / ρ ), the column will not buckle
but simply compress, and a simple σ = P / A model is sufficient.
Failure will then be due to yielding of the material.
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 5
There is an intermediate range of L / ρ where neither Euler's model
nor a P/A model matches experimental results. Johnson's
solution is often used in the intermediate range and is given by
σ y ( L /ρ ) 2
σ J =σ y 1−
4 c π 2
E
In the notes by Prof. Pollock (see A11), the buckling of flat plates
was briefly discussed. This included flat plates subjected to in-
plane compression or shear. Also, due to bending loads, but note
that the bending moment was about an axis perpendicular to the
plate; not the usual plate bending discussed in A05 where the
bending moment is about an x or y axis which lies in the plane of
the plate.
The buckling load for a flat plate is obtained by starting with the
governing differential equation for displacements for a plate as was
derived in A05 but modified so as to include the coupling between
in-plane and out-of-plane displacements (as was done for the
column in A10). For a particular set of edge boundary conditions,
a series solution of sine and cosine functions is assumed that
satisfy the governing differential equation. As for the column, the
result is an eigenvalue problem that must be solved to determine
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 10
the critical load under consideration (compression, shear or
bending moment). Much of the early work on the subject was
done by Gerard and Becker and is reported in Handbook of
Structural Stability, NACA TN 3781, 1957, and also in
Introduction to Structural Stability Theory, Gerard, McGraw-Hill,
1962.
The result of their work is still utilized today. Although the finite
element method may be used to predict bucking and collapse of
plates and more complex structures, it is quite computer intensive
and not done often in practice (because it requires the solution of
nonlinear equations of equilibrium).
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 11
Flat Plates in Compression
Consider a flat plate of thickness 't", dimensions a and b, and
subjected to in-plane compression as shown below.
a
Note that "b" is width of the plate (edge where the load is applied),
and "a" is the length of the plate. Gerard's solution for a flat plate
in compression with various edge boundaries can be summarized
with the following equation:
2
π 2 kc E t
σ cr = 2 b
12(1 −ν )
The constant kc is compressive buckling coefficient and is a
function of the edge boundary conditions and (a/b).
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 12
For the top curve (Case A, loaded edges clamped), you can
identify up to n=7. Thus for (a/b)=2, the plate will buckle with
n=3, i.e., sin(3π x / a) where x is the coordinate axis in the direction
of load application (a direction).
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 14
Example: Consider the problem outlined in Pollock's notes (A11).
A 90"x60" flat plate with square tube stiffeners as shown below is
to withstand an in-plane load of 40 lbf/in. All plate edges are
assumed to be fully clamped. The material for both the plate and
tubes is aluminum with a
Young's modulus of 10.4
Mpsi, Poisson's ratio of
0.3, yield stress of 40 ksi
and specific weight of
0.098 lbf/in^3.
90”
The design parameters are
60”
the plate thickness (t), the
number of added stiffeners
running parallel to the 90" edge and size of the stiffeners. The
stiffeners are square tubes that have a wall thickness equal to that
chosen for the plate. As many stiffeners as desired may be used,
so long as the total cross-sectional area of the stiffeners does not
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 15
exceed 30% of the area of plate (area over which the load is
applied - on one end).
The added stiffeners will relieve some of the load from the plate.
The amount of load carried by the square tubes depends on the
cross-sectional area of each tube and that of the plate. You may
reduce the amount of the edge loading on the plate, accordingly.
Similarly, the addition of stiffeners breaks the plate into two or
more smaller plates that are constrained along all four edges.
Small tubes (less than 1.5" x 1.5") can be taken act as simply
supported constraints for the plate (on edges parallel to tubes).
Tubes larger than this size act as clamped constraints for the plate.
“small” stiffeners “large” stiffeners
Suppose we start the design with a 2" x 2" stiffener every 20" (total
of 2 stiffeners). This will mean that the plate size between
stiffeners is b=20" (and the length is a=90").
2”
t
2” t
b=20”
Since the slenderness ratio for the tube is 110, which is less than
143, then the Johnson equation should be used. Johnson's equation
gives the buckling stress as
σ y ( L / ρ )2 40ksi (110) 2
σ J = σ y 1 − = 40ksi 1 − = 28, 200 psi
π 2 2 6
4 c E 4(4)π (10.4 x10 psi )
The load carried by the column is P = 11.43lbf / in(8") = 91.4lbf
and the compressive load is σ = P / A = 91.4lbf / 0.44in 2 = 208 psi
Note: σ = 208 psi < σ J = 28, 212 psi and σ = 208 psi < σ y = 40ksi .
A12 - Design for Column and Plate Buckling 20
Hence, the tube stiffener is not even close to buckling or yielding.
With this design, when the plate buckles, the stiffened plate will
still carry significantly more load (via the tube stiffeners).