Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • CREW v. Sec. of Education Et Al (Formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, Now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan) : 8/10/2007 - Scheduling Order

    Uploaded by

    CREW
    31 views1 page
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Original Title

    CREW v. Sec. of Education et al (formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan): 8/10/2007 - Scheduling Order

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    31 views1 page

    CREW v. Sec. of Education Et Al (Formerly CREW V. Sec. Margaret Spellings, Now CREW V. Sec. Arne Duncan) : 8/10/2007 - Scheduling Order

    Uploaded by

    CREW
    On December 7, 2006, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) and the Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings in the District court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit is based on DOE's failure to release certain records required by law to be made public. Those records include the activities of advisory panels created under the Reading First Initiative, which was set up by the No Child Left Behind Act. CREW's complaint alleges that DOE failed to comply with any of the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), which requires agencies using panels such as those implemented by the Reading First Initiative to conduct open meetings, make records of those meetings publicly available, and ensure that any recommendation of the panels is the result of a fairly balanced panel. The panel sets up under the Reading First Initiative make recommendations to the Secretary about which states should receive federal funds under the program. In a report issued in September 2006, DOE's Inspector General found that the Reading First Initiative was plagued by conflicts of interest, possible corruption, and numerous violations of law and General Accounting Office (GAO) standards.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Case 1:06-cv-02086-HHK Document 14 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 1

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY


    AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON,

    Plaintiff,
    Civil Action 06-02086 (HHK)
    v.

    MARGARET SPELLINGS, et al.,

    Defendants.

    SCHEDULING ORDER

    Upon consideration of the parties’ joint status report, it is hereby ordered as follows:

    1. Defendant will file its motion to dismiss and accompanying memorandum on

    September 21, 2007.

    2. Plaintiff will file its response in opposition on October 12, 2007.

    3. Defendant will file its reply on October 26, 2007.

    Henry H. Kennedy, Jr.


    United States District Judge

    Dated: August 10, 2007

    You might also like