You are on page 1of 1

1

Closing the gap in the capacity of random wireless networks


Massimo Franceschetti2 , Olivier Dousse 3 , David Tse2 , Patrick Tiran3

Abstract — We consider the problem of how where N0 is the ambient noise power at the receiver. We
throughput in a wireless network with randomly lo- say that in our stochastic model an event occurs with high
cated nodes scales as the number of users grows. Fol- probability (w.h.p.) if its probability tends to one as n → ∞.
lowing the physical model of Gupta and Kumar, we The per-node throughput capacity of the network is defined
show that randomly scattered nodes can achieve the as the number of bits per second that every node can transmit

optimal 1/ n per-node transmission rate of arbitrarily w.h.p. to its destination.
located nodes. This contrasts with √ previous achiev- Our result is the following.
able results suggesting that a 1/ n log n reduced rate
Theorem 1 The per-node throughput capacity of the network
is the price to pay for the additional randomness intro-
defined above is
duced into the system. Our results rely on percolation √
theory arguments. C(n) = Θ(1/ n) bit/sec. (1)

I. Introduction III. Percolation theory


A completely wireless network consists of n nodes that com- To prove our result we establish a connection between perco-
municate over a common wireless channel. A natural question lation theory [2] and wireless networks that can be potentially
that arises in such systems is how the throughput scales with exploited to solve other information and network theoretic
the number n. This question was first addressed in [1]. These questions.
authors show that under the assumption that packets can be Let us consider the following example. Water is poured on
relayed from node to node and interference is simply regarded one side of a large (ideally infinite) porous stone. What is the
as noise at each hop, and if each node transmits to a destina- probability that the water finds a path to the opposite side?
tion non-vanishingly far away, the per-node throughput goes By modeling the stone as a square grid in which each edge

to zero at least as 1/ n bit per second. can be open and hence traversed by water with probability
For random node locations and traffic patterns, they p, and closed otherwise, independently of all other edges, one

show that a per-node throughput of rate 1/ n log n can can show that for p > 1/2 water percolates trough the stone
be achieved. Our contribution is to show that a per-node with probability one. One can then ask at what rate the water

throughput rate of 1/ n can also be achieved by networks of percolates and how it depends on p. In other words, how rich
randomly located nodes, thus closing the gap between upper in disjoint paths is the connected component of open edges?
and lower bounds on the throughput capacity of such net- We relate this latter question to the information flow in our
works. Our proposed protocol also achieves the optimal aver- random wireless network. The open grid edges correspond to
age delay required for a packet to reach its destination. the presence of nodes in certain locations of the plane, and the
open percolating paths represent the wireless backbone that is
II. Main result used to multi-hop packets across the network. We want to op-
We consider a random network where nodes are distributed in erate at p > 1/2, above the percolation threshold, so that we
a square of unit area according to a Poisson point process of can guarantee the existence of many paths that traverse the
intensity n. We let the distance between two nodes i and j be network, but also have p < 1, so to avoid overcrowding and ex-
denoted by dij . We pick uniformly at random a matching of cessive interference. We show that controlling the parameter
source-destination pairs, so that each node is the destination of p corresponds in a wireless network to scaling the transmission
exactly one source. Each node i can transmit with any power power at a given rate as n → ∞. The scaling adopted in [1]
Pi less than the maximum power P0 , and node j receives the corresponds to p = 1, and to have a fully connected backbone
transmitted signal with power Pi L(i, j), where L(·) indicates containing paths that cross the network area. However, this
the path loss between i and j. We assume L(i, j) = d−α −γdij wireless backbone covers all the nodes, generating excessive
ij e ,
for α > 0, γ > 0, or α > 2, γ = 0. We finally assume that two interference. By scaling the power at a higher rate, this back-
nodes can establish a wireless link of unit capacity if the signal bone does not form at all. Percolation theory ensures that a
to interference plus noise ratio at the receiver exceeds some different kind of backbone forms in the transition region be-
threshold t. That is tween this two extreme scalings. This does not cover all the
nodes, nevertheless it is sufficiently rich in crossing paths so
P L(i, j)
SIN R = !i > t, that it can transport all the traffic in the network. By oper-
N0 + k"=i Pk L(k, j) ating the network in this transition region between order and
1 A complete version of this paper can be found at disorder, we are able to prove our tight bound.
www.paradise.caltech.edu/∼massimo/homepage/academic.html References
2 Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Univ.
[1] P. Gupta, P. R. Kumar. “The capacity of wireless networks.”
of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1770. e-mail: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 46(2), 388-404,
{massimof, dtse}@EECS.berkeley.edu 2000.
3 School of Computer and Communication Sciences EPFL

CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland. e-mail: {Patrick.Thiran, [2] G. Grimmett. “Percolation.” Second edition, Springer Verlag,
olivier.dousse}@epfl.ch 1999.

You might also like