Overseas Development

Institute

Opportunities and challenges in

promoting policy- and practice-
relevant knowledge on child rights
Caroline Harper, Nicola Jones and Carlotta Tincati

Working Paper 318

Results of ODI research presented
in preliminary form for discussion
and critical comment

ODI at 50: advancing knowledge, shaping policy, inspiring practice • www.odi.org.uk/50years

 Working Paper 318

Opportunities and challenges in promoting

policy- and practice-relevant knowledge
on child rights

Caroline Harper, Nicola Jones

and Carlotta Tincati

July 2010

Overseas Development Institute

111 Westminster Bridge Road
London SE1 7JD
www.odi.org.uk

* Disclaimer: The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and do
not necessarily represent the views of The African Child Policy Forum,
Childwatch International Research Network, UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre
or Oak Foundation.
ISBN 978 1 907288 27 2
Working Paper (Print) ISSN 1759 2909
ODI Working Papers (Online) ISSN 1759 2917

© Overseas Development Institute 2010

Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce material from ODI Working Papers for their own
publications, as long as they are not being sold commercially. As copyright holder, ODI requests due
acknowledgement and a copy of the publication.

ii
Acknowledgements
This paper was originally published with the African Child Policy Forum, Childwatch International
Research Network and UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre as background paper for the conference
"Children's rights at a Cross-Roads" organised in Addis Ababa November 30th - December 2nd 2009.

A first draft of the paper was shared with the participants in the conference.

The authors wish to acknowledge the valuable peer review comments of Rachel Marcus, participants at
the Children's rights at a Cross Roads Conference, as well as the helpful research assistance of David
Walker.

For information about the conference see: http://www.africanchildinfo.net/conference/

Oak Foundation generously provided the funding necessary for developing this report.

iii
Contents

Acronyms v
1. Introduction 1
1.1 Key research questions 1
1.2 Theoretical framework 2
1.3 Structure of this paper 4
2. The knowledge–policy interface 5
2.1 Knowledge and professional understandings of childhood 5
2.2 The evolution of child rights 8
3. Political and macro policy contexts 11
3.1 Children and macro policy contexts 11
3.2 Children in PRSPs 11
3.3 Economic crisis and social protection 12
3.4 Aid effectiveness 14
3.5 Fragile states and the UNCRC 15
4. Links between knowledge and policy processes relevant to child rights 17
4.1 Knowledge management 17
4.2 Knowledge translation – actors, ideas and processes 27
5. Conclusions 35

References 37
Appendix 1: Towards the development of a high-quality actionable outcome
conference document 42
Appendix 2: Tables and figures 52
Appendix 3: Major authors of information from CRIN mapping 69

iv
Acronyms

AAA American Anthropological Association

ACPF African Child Policy Forum
ADAP Adolescent Development and Participation Unit (UNICEF)
AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
ANDI News Agency for Children’s Rights
CEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
CIHR Canadian Institutes of Health Research
CMRN Child Migration Research Network
COP Community of Practice
CSO Civil Society Organisation
CRIN Child Rights Information Network
CRR Center for Reproductive Rights
DAC Development Assistance Committee (OECD)
DCI Defence for Children International
DFID UK Department for International Development
DHS Demographic and Health Surveys
DRC Democratic Republic of Congo
EAA Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance
EC European Commission
ECPAT End Child Prostitution, Pornography and Trafficking
ELDIS Electronic Development and Environment Information System
ESPAD European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs
EU European Union
FACE Coalition to Fight Against Child Exploitation
GCE Global Campaign for Education
HBSC Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (WHO)
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus
HRW Human Rights Watch
IDA International Development Association
IDASA Institute for Democracy in Africa
IEA International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
ILO International Labour Organization
IPEC International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (ILO)
IPPF International Planned Parenthood Federation
IRC Innocenti Research Centre (UNICEF)
ISCI International Society for Child Indicators
JLICA Joint Learning Initiative on Children and HIV/AIDS
M&E Monitoring and Evaluation
MENA Middle East and North Africa
MDG Millennium Development Goal
MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey
MONEE Monitoring Eastern Europe (IRC)
MSF Médecins Sans Frontières
NCCP National Centre for Children in Poverty
NGO Non-Governmental Organisation
Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation
ODI Overseas Development Institute
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OPT Occupied Palestinian Territories
PISA Programme for International Student Assessment

v
PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper
RAPID Research and Policy in Development (ODI)
SDC Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation
Sida Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
SIMPOC Statistical Information and Monitoring Programme on Child Labour (IPEC)
TIMSS Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies Matrix
UK United Kingdom
UN United Nations
UNAIDS Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS
UNCRC UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
UNDP UN Development Program
UN ECOSOC UN Economic and Social Council
UNESCO UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
UNFPA UN Population Fund
UNICEF UN Children’s Fund
UNIFEM UN Development Fund for Women
UNODC UN Office on Drugs and Crime
UNOHCHR UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
US United States
USAID US Agency for International Development
WABA World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action
WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene
WHO World Health Organization

vi
1. Introduction
It is now 20 years on from the birth of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child
(UNCRC), and the realisation of children’s rights is at a crossroads. The past two decades have
underscored the fact that progress on child well-being is not automatic or inevitable, even with
economic growth. Some global trends are positive, such as falling numbers of children dying each year
thanks to improved nutrition and health interventions such as immunisation – down from 93 deaths
before the age of five for every 1000 live births in 1990 to 68 in 2007 (UNICEF, 2008). But progress in
some developing countries is slow, stagnating or even reversing. Progress on all child-related
indicators is slowest in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, and especially in West and Central Africa.
For instance, in 2006 infant mortality rates were as high as 270 per 1000 live births in Sierra Leone,
whereas figures in Europe are as low as three to seven child deaths per 1000 (Adamson, 2008).
Without dramatic change, most developing countries will miss the child-related Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs), including MDG5 – halving the maternal mortality rate – which has a direct
impact on children. This is particularly concerning in the context of the recent global economic crisis.
Proven impacts of crises on children include increases in child malnutrition, mortality and morbidity,
child labour, youth unemployment, child exploitation and violence and other forms of abuse, alongside
falling school attendance, reduced use of health services and a decline in the overall quality of
education, care, nurture and emotional well-being (Harper et al., 2009a) – and there are clear signs
that the current crisis will be no different (Conceição et al., 2009). Child poverty rates also remain high
in many developed countries: in the US, the proportion of children in poverty was 16.2% in 1979,
reached a peak of 22% in 1993 and stood at 18% in 2007 (NCCP, 2000).

At the same time, research and analysis efforts related to children and children’s rights have
burgeoned in a variety of institutional forums – academia, think-tanks, non-governmental
organisations (NGOs), research networks, international agencies, multilateral and bilateral donors –
with growing numbers of journals, communities of practice (COPs) and epistemic communities on
specific aspects of children’s rights. However, this knowledge base is partial; indeed, one of the
reasons behind the poor performance on child well-being indicators mentioned above relates to a
deficit of knowledge and of strategic knowledge use in policy and practice arenas. 1 The question
motivating this paper is, therefore, how to create a more relevant knowledge base to underpin future
children’s rights strategies that safeguard children’s rights?

1.1 Key research questions

Drawing on a systematic review of both published and grey literature, this paper seeks to answer the
following broad questions about the knowledge–policy interface surrounding children’s rights issues:

• How are global political trends challenging the present relationship between policymaking and
academic institutions, and how does this affect children’s rights and knowledge production
related to child poverty and well-being? For instance:
o How are governance challenges (e.g. fragile or failing states) affecting the realisation of
children’s rights?
o How is the shifting international aid architecture affecting these debates?
o To what extent is the current global economic downturn likely to pose a challenge to future
progress?
• What are the relationships between research, policy and practice in the area of children’s
rights?
o What are the challenges involved in strengthening the collection and analysis of child-
sensitive data?

1 We acknowledge a range of other contributing variables, including political economy factors, resource constraints, patterns
of globalisation and socio-cultural attitudes (Wells, 2009).

1
 o What are the challenges in terms of information sharing, knowledge management and
learning, as well as more innovative use of existing data?
o What types of frameworks have been used to better understand children’s rights, and to
what extent have they had effective policy purchase?
o What types of networks and COPs have been effective in strengthening relationships within
the research–policy–practice triangle?
• How does the research–policy–practice nexus function in other relevant sectors, and what
lessons can be learnt for children’s rights epistemic communities?
o In particular, what lessons can be learned from gender mainstreaming initiatives, where the
relationships between researchers, policymakers and practitioners have arguably been
better institutionalised?

1.2 Theoretical framework

Our collective understanding of the dynamics of the knowledge–policy–practice interface in developing
country contexts is still in a fledgling state (Jones et al., 2009a). This paper takes the research–policy
framework of the Overseas Development Institute’s (ODI’s) Research and Policy in Development
(RAPID) programme as its starting point, which emphasises: 1) the importance of political context; 2)
bridging often isolated policy and knowledge communities; and 3) framing research evidence into
politically palatable and memorable messages (see Figure 1). It applies a modified version to questions
related to child rights policy and practice as elaborated below.

1.3 Figure 1: The RAPID research-to-policy framework

1.3.1 Evidence
In order to understand how to strengthen the link between knowledge and policy in child rights, it is
important to look at how different types of knowledge can contribute. The broader knowledge–policy
interface literature initially focused on the role of science and research in informing policy in a rational
way. Models then began to incorporate an understanding of the pragmatic and often opportunistic
ways in which policymakers draw on different sources, with the nature of evidence (typically
understood as facts or documentation to strengthen a claim or a set of conclusions) the central focus.
Looking at knowledge more broadly – i.e. not only research-based evidence but also familiarity,
awareness or understanding of a particular phenomenon based on experience or study – allows us to
look at the source of the influences guiding policy and to investigate the political and epistemological
dynamics in the production and use of such knowledge, while still including (but also reframing) the
insights already gained into evidence and research.

2
Many types of information have a role to play in improving policy and practice with regard to child well-
being, including scientific and social scientific research (from a single discipline or trans-disciplinary),
project and programme knowledge, reflexive knowledge (i.e. reflections on practice), children’s voices
and impact assessments. Each has strengths and weaknesses, potential benefits and downsides.
Additionally, each of these domains is influenced by historical and cultural circumstances. 2 The central
question guiding this dimension of our framework is therefore:

What roles do different types of knowledge (experiential, mono-disciplinary, trans-disciplinary) play in

evidence-informed policy processes on child rights?

1.3.2 Context
Political context has consistently been identified as the most influential factor determining the
importance attached to evidence in policy spaces (Court et al., 2005; Nash et al., 2006). This comprises
a range of factors, including: nature of the political system (e.g. authoritarian or democratic, roles of
political ideology and religion), as well as level of democratic competition; strength of government
leadership; relative strength of advocates – in this case advocates for child rights; incentive structures
within policymaking organisations; capacities of both policymakers and institutions (e.g. social
development ministries mandated to deal with child rights); and level of influence of external actors
(e.g. donors and international institutions). Together, these factors shape who is able to participate in
the policy process and on what terms, and how the process is structured.

In addition, the dynamics of participation in policy dialogues vary markedly across policy sectors. For
instance, trade policy decisions are often taken behind closed doors, and are based on very specific
technocratic and legal evidence (e.g. Newell and Tussie, 2006). Conversely, policy development in the
education or public health sectors increasingly involves extensive consultation processes and draws
on multiple sources of evidence, including experiential knowledge of beneficiaries such as parents and
children. Surprisingly, these distinctions have received only limited attention in the evidence-based
policy literature to date, even though understanding how knowledge–policymaking relationships vary
according to the characteristics of a policy sector is critical for designing appropriate knowledge
translation and uptake strategies (Jones and Pomares, forthcoming). In the case of child rights, which
straddles multiple sectors, these challenges are magnified, but our contention is that more careful
mapping of these dynamics could enhance the uptake of knowledge on child well-being and ultimately
the realisation of child rights.

The second dimension of our framework is thus guided by two broad questions:

How do the characteristics of the knowledge–policy interface related to childhood well-being differ
across policy contexts, from developmental states to fragile states?
To what extent do knowledge–policy–power dynamics differ across policy sectors, from highly
technical policy areas such as trade policy to more inclusive debates on primary education?

1.3.3 Links
Knowledge and the power to utilise evidence to inform the policy process can pass through many
hands. Accordingly, it is important to understand different policy actors’ abilities to critically engage
with new knowledge as well as the opportunities and challenges they face when bringing evidence to
the table during policy discussions. In many developing countries, the range of actors linking
knowledge and policy over the past 20 to 30 years has become increasingly diverse, and these actors
are playing more fluid roles (Culpeper, 2008; Stone, 2008). Non-state actors (such as political parties,
interest groups and the media), in both private and not-for-profit sectors (Ahmed, 2005; Stone, 2004),

2 Clearly, these are very complex dynamics, and it is beyond the scope of this paper to review all this material in depth merely
to illustrate its potential influence.

3
are increasingly involved at regional and international levels in the context of globalisation, as well as
at national and sub-national levels, as power and resources are decentralised (Scoones et al., 2006). A
key question guiding this third dimension is therefore:

What role do different actors (civil servants, legislators, think-tanks, academics, NGOs, civil society
organisations (CSOs), donors) play in evidence-informed policy processes on child rights?
Understanding how different actors behave at the knowledge–policy interface also involves
consideration of the incentives and barriers to knowledge generation, translation and uptake. In the
case of child rights, in some areas – especially protection and participation – data collection is itself a
real challenge, especially because of the socio-cultural sensitivities involved. In others, there is already
a substantial body of existing knowledge – e.g. nutrition and education – but often this is not easily
accessible to decision makers (as we discuss in more depth in Section 4). For instance, considerable
research exists on the effects of past economic crises on human development outcomes, but the
practical value of these results may not be obvious to policymakers and practitioners deliberating over
appropriate responses to the current crises. Hence, research may need to be ‘translated’ into a
language and format that policymakers can readily grasp and apply. The Canadian Institutes of Health
Research (CIHR) have referred to knowledge translation as ‘a dynamic and iterative process that
includes synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically sound application of knowledge’. 3
Knowledge translation thus goes beyond disseminating research and the isolated production of
communication materials to critically engaging with users of knowledge in different ways and
promoting better knowledge management and information sharing. It must also, however, be informed
by a recognition that policy processes can at times be likened to ‘a chaos of purposes and accidents. It
is not at all a matter of rational implementation of the so-called decisions through selected strategies’
(Clay and Schaffer, 1984). So, for instance, chance encounters with trusted sources and informants may
take on a disproportionate role in shaping policy direction. Our analysis is therefore motivated by the
following question:

What do we know about knowledge translation processes (data collection, information sharing,
knowledge management, policy advocacy) and can we identify good practice that could be adopted
more broadly?

1.4 Structure of this paper

Building on this framework, this paper begins by discussing the multiple types of knowledge that have
shaped dialogues on child rights – both the various frameworks that have been used to conceptualise
childhood and child rights and child-sensitive data collection initiatives and approaches. It then turns
to an overview of the evolving global political context shaping the way child rights are addressed by the
international development community. Here, we consider the poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP)
process, economic crisis and social protection, the new post-Paris aid environment as well as
increasingly complex governance challenges. The fourth section discusses the links between
researchers, policymakers and practitioners, focusing on both knowledge management and knowledge
translation processes. The final section concludes, emphasising issues of contested power in
knowledge generation as well as political context and the knowledge translation processes.

3 www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html.

4
2. The knowledge–policy interface
This section starts with a brief discussion of professional and disciplinary knowledge about childhood,
which illustrates how social/scientific perspectives, through lines of questioning determined by theory,
reveal very variable insights. (Different disciplinary perspectives will be expanded on in Section 4 to
illustrate and analyse their policy purchase.) This knowledge is both informed by and interpreted within
historical and cultural settings, illustrating that knowledge about children depends on time and space
as well as particular disciplinary perspectives, and emphasising the deep understandings that
historical and cultural analysis brings to issues of childhood and child rights. The ways in which this
social scientific knowledge interacted further with the evolution of child rights is then illustrated.
Finally, we focus on commonly used contemporary data regarding child well-being to illustrate some of
the challenges involved in this data collection. Data sources and data interpretation in a particular
political context (the subject of Section 4), along with disciplinary approaches, play a major role in
shaping policy outcomes.

2.1 Knowledge and professional understandings of childhood

Broadly speaking, for professionals, academic discipline partially informs conceptual thinking about
childhood, with differing emphases and priorities accorded by psychologists, economists, lawyers,
sociologists and so on.

Western interest in the field of child development began early in the 20th century with psychoanalytic
and stage development (Freud, Erikson), cognitive (Piaget) and behavioural and social theorists
(Bowlby, Watson, Skinner) beginning to develop increasingly sophisticated understandings of child
development. By and large, human development was conceived as a function of age and children were
seen as immature beings in a state of development, although some theorists identified children as
pseudo-independent beings (for example Piaget).

This early developmental approach also considered children’s welfare largely in relation to women as
mothers (rather than in the social context of women’s lives, gender inequalities, etc) (Mayall, 2000)
which, while clearly important, neglects multiple other influences. The overall approach has been
widely criticised for assuming the existence of universal characteristics, and indeed stages of
development, that apply to all boys and girls. Nevertheless, stage theories extended considerable
influence over understandings of child development and practice, and continue to do so, 4 with some
notable exceptions. 5

While certain aspects of childhood are indeed universal – indisputable needs, such as food, rest and
sleep, as well as certain commonalities in cognitive development, such as acquisition of language – the
notion of children developing in stages that occur universally in a fixed sequence is questionable
(Boyden and Levison, 2000). Contemporary sociology of childhood is focused particularly on addressing
the tension between the understanding of shared commonalities across age cohorts and the need to
recognise that childhood is not merely a common and biological phase in the life course. It has also
introduced a focus on the importance of children’s own perspectives of their needs, competencies,
abilities and potential free will, alongside recognition of their subordination to and control by adults
(Mayall, 2000). This posed a challenge to the dominant body of knowledge, which conceived of children
as largely incompetent, unreliable and unstable and still relied on ideas of children’s innocence, as
promulgated in the 18th century in Western notions of childhood (see Box 1 below).

4 Their impact on policy and practice are evident, especially in education, health care and social work. For example, mainstream
schooling in most countries is structured according to age grades (Boyden and Levison, 2000) and relations between teachers,
pupils, school curricula and age-based targets for achievement still rely on stage-based theories (Morrow, 2006).
5 Maria Montessori, for example, rejected age segregation in education. Montessori schools tend to have mixed age classes.

5
Scholars of the sociology of childhood from the 1980s have highlighted the emergence of a paradigm
opposing predominant theories of development psychology, based on four key elements (James and
Prout, 1990). First, childhood is conceptualised as a social construction used to contextualise the early
years but with no natural or universal feature. Second, childhood is conceived of as a variable that
cannot be separated from others, such as class, gender and ethnicity. Third, childhood and children are
worth studying in their own right and are not dependent on adult perspectives. Finally, children are
active actors in the construction of their social lives.

These new perspectives build on research analysing the effect of the social and cultural environment
on children, notably by Lev Vygotsky, and recognise that this has a profound ‘structuring’ effect on
childhood (Wood, 1998). As emphasised by Boyden (2003), the social construction of human
experience is now widely accepted and is seen to greatly influence child development and behaviour.

Box 1: Economic analysis of childhood

Economic frameworks stand out for the extent to which children remain largely unrecognised (Boyden and Levison,
2000). Either represented as passive actors (human capital theory) or largely invisible (unitary model of household
economics), children fail to receive recognition as economic agents with specific preferences (collective model of
household economics and bargaining literature), or are placed within worlds that do not reflect their realities (child
labour theories). 6 It is true that, in recognising how increasing skills and knowledge have future economic returns
(Becker, 1964; Mincer, 1974; Schultz, 1971), human capital theory has highlighted children since the 1950s as ‘actors
worth investing in’. But children are not recognised as active agents with the power to affect outcomes in the present,
and are at best viewed as passive recipients of education and potential future workers with an income. Human capital
theory essentially highlights the role of education in enabling escape from poverty (Bell and Gersbach, 2009) and
children as the main drivers for achieving this.

Economic analysis of the household has been challenged for assuming the existence of one welfare function, reflecting
the preferences of all members (unitary model). Implications for child well-being are evident in the assumption that the
household is headed by a ‘benevolent dictator’, who not only ignores internal dynamics but also disregards the fact
that children ultimately have preferences that they may want to express in decision-making processes. The weak
theoretical foundations of the unitary model led economists to call for a shift towards collective approaches (non-
cooperative and cooperative models), which conceive of households as ‘small factories’ of different individuals
(Becker, 1981), motivated by both altruism and self-interest (Chiappori et al., 1993). Along these lines, bargaining
literature has developed as a move away from the limits of household economics towards the recognition of the
existence of internal negotiations between men and women. While this represents a turning point vis-à-vis children
also, these models nonetheless leave child–parent negotiations in a black box (Boyden and Levison, 2000) and, most
importantly, disregard child agency.

Lack of attention to children’s realities is particularly evident in labour economics, which has shown little interest in
children at work, owing to a Northern construction of childhood as a time of education and play and preparation for
adult responsibilities, a time in which children are implicitly not considered part of the workforce (Boyden and Levison,
2000). As economics started to model child labour force participation, such dissonance with reality persisted, in failing
to look at whether discouraging child work is in fact good for children and society at large, focusing instead on what it
would take to discourage it.

The emphasis and lack of specificity regarding children can have significant implications. A focus on paid labour, for
example, with little attention to what happens within a household, can lead to blanket assumptions about children and
work. It is important to consider the possibility that children’s work can be beneficial for their own development, as
opposed to that of the household, and that household work can limit educational attainment more than labour force
work (Levison, 2000). Moehling (1997, in Boyden and Levison, 2000), for instance, has suggested that the share of
household income earned by children may enhance their role in family decision making, with working children in early
20th century urban America receiving a larger share of household resources than non-working children. Thus, economic
theories that suggest that child labour perpetuates poverty by displacing schooling for children and, in turn, children’s
prospects of raising future earnings (Ravallion and Wodon, 2000; Ray, 2000) constitute a partial approach.

6 Often, branches of economics reflect these features simultaneously.

6
Social and cultural knowledge thus permeate understandings of childhood and exert important
influences both on the framing of research-based evidence and on how policymakers filter and
interpret research-based evidence. Are children born to play or to work? Is physical punishment
allowable? When or should sex education be taught in schools? How should we deal with violent
children? How do children recover from traumas? Policy responses are informed by individual
experience, culture, history and social and scientific theory and evidence These influences cross
national boundaries as policy ‘solutions’ are shared. This is well illustrated by Boyden (2003) in her
account of war-affected children and resilience, where she describes the influence of Western
psychological theories operating in a de-contextualised manner and resulting in inappropriate or
unhelpful policy and practice decisions.

Box 2: The influence of 18th century notions of childhood

The extent to which culture is inevitably translated into policy can be seen when childhood is placed in historical
and sociological perspective. In the 18th century, Jean-Jacques Rousseau took issue with the then contemporary
idea that children were imperfect adults, leading to widely held perceptions of childhood as a distinct and
innocent period of life – which has become a cherished notion of Western culture. In Rousseau’s view, as he
articulated in his account of the life of Emile (1762), childhood functions according to its own laws and
developmental stages – ideas that have significantly influenced contemporary ideas on children and ‘stages of
development’ (still reflected in psychology and education). William Blake, the writer and poet, further
encapsulated this by juxtaposing the innocent, pastoral world of childhood against an adult world of corruption
and repression. 7 Similar perceptions were depicted in Western visual art of the time. It is argued that these ideas
remain deeply rooted in the Western national consciousness, coming into conflict with the reality of children as
active and sometimes violent and unpredictable beings. 8

Western societies, as with most cultures worldwide, also have deeply held notions of gender-appropriate roles.
An early example of this is revealed in Britain in the 18th century in Rousseau’s description of Emile’s future wife
and her ‘naturally’ lower place in society, perceptions that continue to run deep in many Western societies. 9 In
this vein, according to Cohen (2004), English society has since the 17th century portrayed girls’ superior
educational achievement as a phenomenon to be addressed. Concern about ‘underachieving boys’ still informs
today’s educational policy and is apparent in the discussion of reduced standards in examinations and girls’
consequent relative achievements. Girls’ achievement has thus been an engine for change because it has always
been seen as a problem requiring changes in the examination or educational system.

Incorporating cultural and historical perspectives into contemporary understandings of childhood well-
being can help lead not only to appropriate policy but also to a broader understanding of underlying
and hidden factors affecting policy. Szreter (2007), for example, challenges the narrow argument that
birth registration in developing countries is a luxury. He argues that, in early industrialising Britain, a
comprehensive registration system and a social security system were important and that, while birth
registration is clearly a human rights priority, it can also be strongly linked to broad-based liberal
market development. Other such historical studies in the UK address a range of topics: from
enforcement of paternal responsibility vis-à-vis illegitimate children (Nutt, 2006), support for lone
parenthood (Evans, 2006) and work–life balance within the family (Cook, 2003; Thane, 2002); to
issues of the broader living environment of the child, which include juvenile justice systems (Wills,
2007); to studies focusing on educational matters, such as school absenteeism (Sheldon, 2009) and

7 In Songs of Innocence and Experience (1794).

8 When children are revealed as violent, as in the UK in 1993 with the murder of two-year-old James Bulger by two boys aged
10 and 11, the notion of the ideal innocent child is destroyed and society’s response appears inadequate and unprepared. The
courts were criticised for failing to know how to treat these children in an age-appropriate way.
9 This brief description of female education sparked an immense contemporary response. Mary Wollstonecraft, for example,
dedicated a substantial portion of her chapter ‘Animadversions on Some of the Writers who have Rendered Women Objects of
Pity, Bordering on Contempt’ in A Vindication of the Rights of Women (1792) to attacking Rousseau and his arguments.

7
boys’ underachievement (Cohen, 2004) – all of which are shown to have policy-relevant historically
informed pathways.

However, cultural and historical trajectories, while illuminating with regard to local contexts, are not a
justification for practices. Early marriage, denial of education to girls and female genital mutilation all
articulate powerful perceptions of childhood and also demonstrate that informing and overlaying more
general societal understandings are religious and moral codes, often called upon to justify or explain
so-called ‘cultural practices’.

Thus, how disciplines, societies and individuals interpret childhood is clearly hugely variable and
subject to a deep and complex knowledge base. As professionals, scientific objectivity and rigorous
method allow us to partially overcome stereotypical observations and interpretation; however, our own
professional training and culture lend bias and, as anthropological discourse on reflexivity has
uncovered, our personal experience is undeniable. Stepping outside of our deep and implicitly shared
understandings onto a new cultural and disciplinary terrain is necessary on the path towards
innovative and relevant policymaking. Interdisciplinary research that challenges us all to reconsider the
boundaries of our intellectual questioning opens up new possibilities for inventive policy. How, then,
are we to make sense not only of our understandings of childhood but also of what common
aspirations we pursue, and thus what relevant policy we, as a development community, seek? Placing
our own professional discourse in historical context alongside that of the evolution of the UNCRC
allows us to understand better the evolving perceptions of the child.

2.2 The evolution of child rights

Child rights frameworks have clearly evolved, encompassing new dimensions in response to a slowly
changing policy environment and knowledge base regarding children’s well-being, as described above.
Different understandings of childhood are reflected in critiques on the UNCRC which, to an extent, also
acts as a lens on the array of thought processes regarding childhood and their change over time.

It is unsurprising that in its early years the idea of child rights focused on protection and ‘relief’, since
this reflected the welfare perspectives common in the early 20th century. At this time, movements to
protect children in different settings had gained limited momentum and the human rights regime was
overarching rather than focused on differentiated responses (Alston and Tobin, 2005). The notion of
children as rights-bearers emerged in response to the vulnerability of children so starkly observed
following World War II. Eglentyne Jebb, Founder of Save the Children, drafted a Declaration of the Rights
of the Child in 1923, which was adopted by the League of Nations in 1924.

In historical perspective, this was an important turning point. At the time, the Declaration, and the
international legal instruments that followed, tended to focus on children’s entitlement to emergency
assistance and protection rather than civil and political rights and empowerment: satisfying needs (Art.
2), prioritising relief in times of distress (Art. 3) and protecting against exploitation (Art. 4). The four
Geneva Conventions on International Humanitarian Law (1949) also included children as a specific
category of protected persons, emphasising linkages of child rights to mothers and women.
International organisations gradually started getting involved, maintaining throughout the first half of
the century and beyond what has been defined as a welfarist approach to children (Alston and Tobin,
2005).

The Cold War period has largely been seen as a period of stagnation in international efforts in human
rights, including the rights of the child, although some changes were made during this period. At a
legislative level, while the texts of the major international human rights instruments of the time, the
1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two International Human Rights Covenants, barely
mentioned the term ‘children’s rights’ (Alston and Tobin, 2005), the UN General Assembly adopted a
new version of the Declaration of the Rights of the Child in 1959, with additional points on entitlement
to a name and nationality from birth (Art. 3) and to a caring living environment (Art. 6). It took another

8
10 years before the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights entered into force, ratified by 35 states. Importantly,
however, women’s rights in particular gained some momentum, and were the focus of a number of
forums, such as the 1975 World Conference on International Women’s Year in Mexico, the 1980 World
Conference on the UN Decade for Women in Copenhagen, which saw states sign the Convention on the
Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), adopted the previous year by the
General Assembly) and the 1985 World Conference in Nairobi.

The end of the Cold War marked what has been defined as the ‘new human rights movement’ (Alston,
1987), with the recognition of a range of new rights, such as the rights to development, to a clean
environment and to humanitarian assistance. Some have argued that this began to correct what has
been seen as an individualistic bias in human rights, with a move to consider a range of new needs,
including those of developing countries. Indeed, Buergenthal (1997) argues that, with the fall of the
Berlin Wall, human rights were liberated from ideological conflicts, and what had been until then a
dichotomy between civil-political rights and economic-social-cultural rights ended. Others have
claimed it made human rights synonymous with state rights and collective rights and was thus pushing
an anti-Western agenda with its attempts to counterbalance the individualistic bias of former rights
discussions (ibid).

Nevertheless, the 1993 Vienna Declaration reflected contemporary political changes by recognising the
legitimacy of promoting and protecting ‘all’ human rights (Para. 4) and declaring their universal
character (Para. 5). Cultural relativism, which had justified violations of human rights by reference to
religion and culture, was rejected. By highlighting the interdependence of democracy, development
and respect for human rights (Para. 8), Buergenthal (1997) suggests that the Declaration also
abandoned the Cold War’s ‘legal and political fiction’ that all governments, including non-democratic
ones, could protect human rights. This remains a partial view of non-democratic society, whose
achievement in some areas of human rights could be seen to outperform that of some democratic
societies, for example the commitment of some communist countries to gender equality in the
workplace, and attention to child development and survival, including maternal health.

The UNCRC signalled the beginning of a new stage, in which international standards to promote
children’s rights had to be translated into domestic law (Lansdown, 2005) and the child was
recognised as a rights-holder independently as well as in relation to the family. In particular, for the
first time, an international treaty recognised that the child had the right to participate in all matters
affecting him or her (Art. 12) and asserted that direction and guidance provided by parents or others
with responsibility for the child must take into account the capacities of the child to exercise rights on
his or her own behalf (Art. 5) (ibid).

Analysts from a sociological and anthropological perspective (broadly speaking) were initially opposed
to the universal prescriptions as outlined in the UNCRC. At the same time, they argued that, through
international rights legislation, and specifically the UNCRC, a European conception of childhood based
on the values of a white, urban middle class had been exported to the South (Boyden, in James and
Prout, 1990). The UNCRC was felt to be responsible for reflecting Western constructs of the child as still
an immature being in need of protection (Jefferess, 2002), and for making children’s daily activities,
including contributing towards household economies, seem dysfunctional, as opposed to being
survival mechanisms (Mayall, 2000; Boyden, in James and Prout, 1990). Western provisions for
‘normal’ childhoods – including survival, schooling and anti-labour legislation – it was argued, could
be promoted in the guise of science, ignoring the plurality of pathways to maturity, the relativity of
children’s ‘needs’ (Woodhead, in James and Prout, 1990) and the linkage of rights and cultural values.
It was held that ignoring ‘markers of social difference’ between children along the lines of gender,
ethnicity and religion (Morrow, 2006) (which created particular discomfort among delegates from the
South at the time of the consultations involved in drafting the Convention) would contribute to the
globalisation of the concept of childhood based on Western constructs. Indeed, the particularisation of
child rights issues, isolated from class, race and gender, was conceived of by some as a way of

9
avoiding direct engagement with the political and economic realities of the emerging global economy
(Fernando, 2001).

Clearly, these critiques have many points of validity. Interpretations of children’s rights – for example,
the right not to work, or indeed the right to work – have been the subject of many debates on national
and international labour policy and practice. However, such concerns may have been overly alarmist,
and are also in danger of failing to tackle discriminatory attitudes under the guise of respect for
‘cultural norms or differences’.

A contrasting interpretation of the UNCRC argued that it was actually groundbreaking in the extent that
it challenged the assumptions of conventional child development theory based on the universality of
child development, the normative status of adulthood and the idea that childhood is an extended
period of dependence (Lansdown, 2005). Through the Convention, children would become subjects
that acquire different competencies according to the environment and culture they are raised in (as
opposed to specific ages), parental rights and responsibilities would not be unbounded and children
would have rights within the family.

These two remarkably different views place their emphasis on different aspects of the Convention. The
former focuses on the Convention’s aim of universal ratification and raises issues such as a universally
defined age for childhood as under 18, thereby referring to a universal, immature child who is on a
particular developmental trajectory and in need of protection. The second perceives space for
difference within the detailed articles. In this regard, the rights-based framework, promoted through
the UNCRC and its three ‘Ps’ (protection, provision and participation), can be seen to move away partly
from this risk of ‘essentialising‘ childhood (Morrow, 2006) by highlighting the concept of the evolving
capacities of the child (Art. 5) and the right to participation (Art. 12), and also arguing that recognising
rights to participate may reflect the beginning of an altered construction of childhood.

It has been argued that the children’s rights discourse is unable to address the issue of power relations
affecting children, with the danger of ending up further marginalising the real needs of children
(Fernando, 2001). This may be partially valid, but the rights-framed approach derived from the UNCRC
often promotes the views of the child as a subject both in need of protection (Art. 32) and with the right
to express views and participate, thus including (among a wide range of areas) birth registration
policies, anti-child labour legislation and national development plans ‘informed’ by children views.

Critiques based in cultural relativism now do generally support the idea of human rights. An important
milestone was passed in 1999 when the American Anthropological Association gave its backing to the
Universal Declaration on Human Rights by acknowledging it and the associated implementing
international legislation as a baseline:

‘People and groups have a generic right to realize their capacity for culture, and to produce, reproduce
and change the conditions and forms of their physical, personal and social existence, so long as such
activities do not diminish the same capacities of others. Anthropology as an academic discipline
studies the bases and the forms of human diversity and unity; anthropology as a practice seeks to
apply this knowledge to the solution of human problems. As a professional organisation of
anthropologists, the AAA has long been, and should continue to be, concerned whenever human
difference is made the basis for a denial of basic human rights, where “human” is understood in its full
range of cultural, social, linguistic, psychological, and biological senses.’

Following from this, it becomes clear that ‘difference’ is seen to coexist alongside universal human
rights, and sociological understandings of different childhoods retain their validity without necessarily
denying the importance of children’s rights. The healthy debate on culture, universality and rights is far
from over, but undoubtedly the framework for the debate has changed.

10
3. Political and macro policy contexts
Political context has consistently been identified as the most influential factor in determining the
importance attached to evidence in policy spaces (Court et al., 2005) (see Section 1). Participation in
policy dialogues varies across sectors. In some, decisions are very much behind closed doors; in
others, such as education or natural resource management, more open dialogues take place.
Understanding how the relationship between knowledge and policymaking varies according to the
sector is critical for designing appropriate knowledge translation and uptake strategies.

ODI has recently developed an analytical framework to understand these specificities (Jones and
Pomares, forthcoming). Key variables include: level of technical expertise required to participate in
policy debates; level of contestation in the sector; and extent to which policy discourses are
internationalised. These factors are in turn shaped by broader political context factors, such as the
extent to which knowledge producers can effectively communicate their work and the pivotal role of
advocates or champions for specific causes. Our discussion here focuses on dialogue at a macro policy
level to analyse the extent to which children are considered by actors involved in macro policy
decisions and the way in which the knowledge–policy interface operates in particular policy contexts.

3.1 Children and macro policy contexts 10

As Section 2 reveals, the very existence of the UNCRC and its evolution is interdependent with progress
in understandings of and knowledge about poverty and child development, both separately and
together. Nevertheless, the extent to which mainstream aid and development policies incorporate
understandings of childhood remains minimal, outside of development policy on vitally important
health and education needs, among other child-focused and sector-specific areas. It is clear that
progress is not automatic or inevitable, even with economic growth, good governance and state
recognition of the importance of improving child well-being. Slow progress on the MDGs indicates that
progress towards child rights requires a more concerted approach, and one that moves the interests of
children beyond sector-specific approaches, important as they are, into mainstream aid and
development agendas. Drawing lessons from the relative success of gender mainstreaming (explored
further below), it is necessary to look beyond a focus on human capital development and actively
extend the reach of dominant development debates to include children’s multidimensional rights,
including rights to care, protection and participation.

Mainstreaming requires not only a child-sensitive lens, to elicit possible effects or consequences of
macro-level policies, but also demonstrable causation, linking children to the macro-level issue under
discussion, and a policy response suggesting possible changes and adaptations. Because children’s
poverty is above all multidimensional, dynamic over the lifecourse, dependent on relationships and
subject to a particular depth of voicelessness, exceptional clarity is needed in making such links
apparent, thereby addressing the particular characteristics of childhood deprivation.

We consider four policy ‘contexts’ that are potentially instrumental in advancing children’s rights, all
part of a changing macro policy environment, in order to better understand the knowledge policy links
in these domains: the uptake of child well-being in PRSPs; the effect of the current economic crisis on
children and social protection policy responses; the broader aid environment and consideration of
child well-being; and governance challenges in relation to the UNCRC in fragile states.

3.2 Children in PRSPs

In response to growing disillusionment with structural adjustment and aid conditionalities,
prioritisation of country ownership and more effective aid coordination rose rapidly up the policy
agenda in the late 1990s. PRSPs emerged as the key policy instrument, with a strong emphasis on

10 Some material from this section is drawn from Harper and Jones (2009a).

11
partnership between governments and other actors, participation and results-oriented approaches. In
light of the importance of this, the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child in 2003 called for children
to be mainstreamed into the process (General Comment 5).

Overall, however, evaluations suggest that, although child-related policies such as basic child health
and education are well addressed, comprehensive child rights approaches receive low visibility (e.g.
Minujin et al., 2006). Consideration of the specificity of children’s experiences of poverty, and the way
these evolve over the course of childhood, are seldom included in situational analyses and, besides
MDG-related indicators, are generally not reflected in monitoring and evaluation (M&E) progress targets
to which governments are held to account (Harper and Jones, 2009b).

A number of initiatives have involved children and youth in consultation processes so that PRSPs can
better reflect children’s concerns and priorities. For instance, a UN Children’s Fund- (UNICEF-)
supported initiative in Liberia led to greater attention in the 2007 PRSP to girls’ personal safety. In El
Salvador, grassroots consultations with young people led to greater attention to domestic violence as
part of a multidimensional approach to poverty reduction (ADAP, 2009). Generally, however, despite
opening up new spaces for child-focused policy advocacy, such initiatives have tended to be small in
scale, with limited ultimate influence on policy content (O’Malley, 2004).

It would appear that far more coordinated action from national governments, child rights advocates
and donors is urgently needed. There is now compelling evidence not only that childhood poverty
affects a higher proportion of children than adults and is potentially more damaging, but also that it is
analytically distinct, especially because of the ways children’s capacities and multidimensional needs
evolve over the course of childhood (Jones and Sumner, 2007). This knowledge base needs to be
reflected in national poverty situational assessments as well as translated into measurable and
actionable targets and indicators, so that accountability mechanisms can be strengthened. For this,
capacity-strengthening support for typically resource- and capacity-constrained social welfare
ministries and children’s agencies is urgently required. Similarly, to promote more meaningful
consultation processes with children and young people, greater thought is needed as to how child and
youth facilitators can more effectively translate children’s and young people’s insights into mainstream
policy dialogues, and triangulate participatory knowledge with more conventional and often more
‘acceptable’ research-based knowledge (e.g. Pham and Jones, 2005; Theis, 1996). Additionally,
accessible child-sensitive budgeting tools have been developed (although uptake has been much more
limited than that of broader pro-poor and gender budgeting tools (Vasquez, 2004)) and could usefully
be integrated into broader PRSP M&E efforts.

Overall, despite several years of advocacy by concerned groups, uptake of children’s issues in poverty
planning has been slow. Nevertheless, knowledge- and action-based initiatives can be undertaken to
promote children’s visibility in this domain (see excellent discussion in Beazley et al., 2009). Children’s
enhanced visibility in poverty planning, a multidimensional appreciation of children’s needs and well-
being outcomes that also consider influences on the child from the macro to micro levels would
enhance child well-being.

3.3 Economic crisis and social protection

Proven impacts of crises on children include increases in child malnutrition, mortality and morbidity,
child labour, youth unemployment, child exploitation and violence and other forms of abuse, alongside
falling school attendance, reduced use of health services and a decline in the overall quality of
education, care, nurture and emotional well-being (Harper et al., 2009a). With clear signs that the
current global financial crisis will be no different, this could jeopardise the future capabilities of
children from poor households to rise above the poverty level, contributing to a lifetime of poverty and
potentially its intergenerational transmission (Harper et al., 2003).

12
These effects are a direct result of declining investments in public services, reduced household
incomes and purchasing power, increased parental unemployment and migration effects, related
increases in domestic tensions and violence, considerably increased workloads for parents, especially
women, and related reduced capacity for nurture, care and protection. With significantly higher
estimates of numbers of people in poverty than might have been expected and, relatedly, 30,000 to
50,000 additional infant deaths in sub-Saharan Africa in 2009 alone (Friedman and Schady, 2009),
could policy approaches respond with more of a child focus and effectively mainstream children’s
concerns?

There is sufficient evidence (Harper et al., 2009a) that responses to financial shocks can be nuanced
towards more child-sensitive outcomes, through recognition of the effects of crisis on children, through
considerably more timely and systematic age- and gender-disaggregated data collection and crisis
monitoring initiatives and through more strategic uses of aid. Hossain et al. (2009), for instance, have
included children’s experiences as part of their qualitative social impact assessment of the global
crisis, highlighting children’s vulnerability to sexual exploitation, nutritional deprivation and exposure
to familial tensions, for instance.

More nuanced crisis responses would also include a better understanding of the potential space for
civil society to shape policy dialogues and hold governments accountable for crisis management
efforts. The fostering of synergies between formal social protection approaches and existing informal
mechanisms, which often come under strain during crises, is especially critical, including specific
attention to the gendered effects of unemployment and underemployment and related measures to
address women’s time poverty and support women’s greater responsibility for care and domestic work.
This could include: subsidised child care services; services focused on countering rising rates of
mental ill-health and drug and substance abuse; and countercyclical policy choices, protecting
investments in basic and social services and allowing for more timely scaling-up of targeted social
protection interventions for the most vulnerable. Such responses, although fragmentary, have proven
to be effective in protecting children in past crises (e.g. Jones and Marsden, 2009; Marcus, 2009).
However, , as discussed in more depth below, they remain poorly understood in policy circles because
of poor knowledge management systems and a relative dearth of knowledge intermediaries to
effectively translate research messages into actionable policy and programmatic interventions.

Social protection is increasingly seen as an important component of poverty reduction strategies and
efforts to reduce vulnerability to shocks and stresses. Children can be direct targets – child protection
is increasingly seen as an important component of poverty reduction strategies and efforts to r or
benefit indirectly through measures that increase household income and consumption capacities and
potentially reduce demand for child labour. However, commitment levels to social protection vary. A
number of developing countries have mainstreamed social protection, including child-focused
measures, into their national development plans, and some have developed specific national social
protection plans (Ghana, Senegal). Yet, while a limited number of middle-income countries have been
able to scale up child-focused programmes significantly (e.g. Brazil’s Bolsa Familia and South Africa’s
Child Grant), for others the small scale and ad hoc nature of existing programmes is a key constraint to
addressing the depth and severity of poverty and vulnerability. Moreover, especially in low-income sub-
Saharan Africa, social protection institutions and policies are scarce, and developing coordinated and
effective national systems requires that they be established anew (Holmes and Braunholtz-Speight,
2009).

Equally importantly, relatively little attention has been paid to children’s multidimensional experiences
of poverty and vulnerability, and how this can best be reflected in social protection policies and
programmes (Jones, 2009). Children’s vulnerabilities are not exclusively economic in nature, and often
intersect with socio-cultural factors, including gender and intra-household relations, social exclusion
and legal and cultural power imbalances (Holmes and Braunholtz-Speight, 2009). Indeed, recent
evidence suggests that protection-related vulnerabilities represent some of the most pressing
challenges facing children globally (UN, 2006a). But existing child protection systems are weak,

13
fragmented and under-resourced, both financially and in terms of human capital, in much of the
developing world. In order to address child-specific vulnerabilities holistically, important potential
synergies between social protection and child protection systems are beginning to be recognised
(Jones, 2009), but much more needs to be done to mainstream these initiatives effectively. An
understanding of social protection as potentially ‘transformative’ allows for complementarities
between social equity measures such as legislative frameworks that seek to address children’s right to
protection and social protection policy frameworks. It also provides important entry points for fostering
synergies between existing programmes (e.g. cash transfers, social health insurance schemes and
public works programmes) and social welfare services (child care services, family violence counselling
and shelters, education programmes for out-of-school children) (ibid). Context-appropriate
mainstreaming responses will require concerted investments in awareness raising and capacity
strengthening for programme designers and implementers, and efforts to improve coordination and
data collection efforts across multiple sectors, from social development to health, justice and
migration.

3.4 Aid effectiveness

There is an implicit assumption that funding to realise children’s rights in developing countries
(primarily low-income countries) flows naturally through aid systems, not least because of the
increasingly coordinated focus around poverty reduction and the MDGs, and that correcting any flaws
in the system itself will result, automatically, in improved child well-being. The 2005 Paris Declaration
was a much-needed landmark agreement on improving aid quality. However, the shift towards sector
and direct budget support has affected the realisation of children’s rights (Harper and Jones, 2009b):
the Paris agenda affects the content of aid, as well as the modality. New and linked processes for aid
delivery demand new and linked negotiations among donors and among groups of donors and
government, in forums where specific issues, such as child well-being, may fall off the agenda through
lack of common agreement and support or because they are not seen as sufficiently ‘upstream’ and
strategic. Viewed as a ‘crosscutting’ or, more frequently, ‘special interest’ issue, children’s rights can
suffer from the problems of policy evaporation that have plagued attempts to mainstream other human
rights issues.

There is relatively high visibility of child rights in donor cooperation (it is generally a ‘good news issue’,
especially with the electorate), but there is little strategic consideration of children within core donor
strategies, and only modest attention in M&E or records of investment (Harper and Jones, 2009c). Jones
and Young (2007), in a review of international research donors, found, for instance, that rights and
social justice issues, including the rights of children and young people, primarily were included in the
research strategies of smaller donors. It is also telling that those working on child rights portfolios feel
marginalised and that linkages and networks with other governmental, non-governmental and
multilateral agencies are reported to be quite limited. Moreover, while specific aspects of child rights
(especially education and health) are integrated into research and knowledge management, sometimes
with significant funding, there is little or no overall child rights strategy behind this.

It is clear that, to achieve children’s rights, donors need to step up their own capacities to prevent a
decline in the amount of attention children receive in the new international aid architecture. Currently,
there is no cross-donor working group on child rights, in contrast with the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee’s (DAC’s) GENDERNET
model. The very limited understanding of child vulnerabilities and child rights, in particular
participation and protection, is evidenced by the lack of discussion on core policy documents, the lack
of child rights strategies or senior management interest in such issues and the very thin staffing
accorded child rights.

What these examples illustrate is the ways in which actors at the macro policy table engage with issues
of childhood and the importance of knowledge about children in terms of informing decisions. There is
good knowledge of how children should be incorporated into poverty planning or responses to

14
economic crises; nevertheless, difficulties remain in framing and communicating this knowledge and
ensuring it is taken seriously. Important players in these policy discussions have not assimilated the
wealth of knowledge that exists on childhood well-being to better enable its uptake in developing
country contexts. As Section 3.5 illustrates in relation to fragile states, where aid is particularly
important, issues of child well-being need to be articulated at the macro policy table, to address these
countries’ attempts to fulfil their commitments under the UNCRC. And as Section 4 illustrates, making
more of the skill sets and insights of the range of actors involved in the knowledge–policy process is
critical to addressing child rights.

3.5 Fragile states and the UNCRC

The almost universal ratification of the UNCRC (currently 194 countries, with the exception of the US),
and even the large number of countries that are party to CEDAW (over 90% of members of the UN), do
not constitute evidence of countries’ progress on child rights. Human rights regimes are generally weak
in providing for enforcement mechanisms, and studies focused on the relationship between treaty
ratifications and human rights ratings are suggestive of frequent negative correlation between the two
(Hathaway, 2002). On the one hand, a treaty can modify nations’ practices; on the other, it can be seen
to reward positions rather than effects (ibid). In contexts of low monitoring and enforcement efforts,
and high external pressure to conform to international treaties, treaty ratification can become a
costless means of offsetting pressure to undertake real changes in policies, or even a shield for
repressive behaviours (Hafner-Burton and Tsutsui, 2005). Given the possibility that human rights
treaties represent ‘window dressing’, as opposed to a serious commitment to implementation, the
current UN policy of promoting universal ratification has been questioned by some, and initiatives for
making ratifying benefits less easily obtainable are encouraged. Demonstrating compliance before
becoming a signatory to a human rights treaty could be considered a step forward here.

However, the risks entailed in increasing the costs of joining a treaty cannot be disregarded, as some
nations may consequently choose to opt out. Moreover, although treaty ratifications have been
portrayed as a ‘paradox of empty promises’ (Hafner-Burton and Tsutsui, 2005), it is undeniable that
related activities surrounding human rights legislation have an important ‘informational effect’,
communicating the legitimacy of human rights across international society at large (ibid). In this vein, it
seems that international frameworks should be recognised for their specific capacity to create and
nurture a network of relevant actors and advocates who can enable change over the long term. The
Fourth World Conference on Women (Beijing 1995), for instance, initiated a process with civil society
that continued through the review and appraisal sessions of the Beijing Declaration and Platform for
Action in 2000 (Beijing +5) and 2005 (Beijing +10).

Table 3 (in Appendix 2) analyses selected Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Rights of
the Child, consolidating the common areas of concern identified by the Committee across the countries
in our sample, including for fragile states (as per the International Development Association (IDA)
definition), released by the Committee across 2008-2009. State parties analysed are Chad, the
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Djibouti, Eritrea, Mauritania and Niger. 11 What the analysis reveals
is the enormous challenges facing fragile states in relation to ratifying the UNCRC: lack of human and
financial resources, poor coordination, lack of appropriate child governance bodies, lack of
comprehensive national plans, little independent monitoring, lack of targeted resources for children,
absence of efficient data collection systems, limited cooperation with civil society, limited evidence of
child-centred policy, lack of adequate birth registration, poor basic health services and education,
involvement in armed conflict, a failure to protect children against violations, armed conflict, sexual
exploitation and wanting juvenile justice systems. Faced with such enormous challenges, it is clear that
full ratification of the UNCRC is a long-term objective, intimately linked not only to the issues discussed
above regarding different perceptions of childhood and children’s rights, but also to aid and

11 A full list of Concluding Observations released to date is at: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/sessions.htm.

15
development policy more broadly, and the incorporation of children’s issues at the macro policy level.
In order to promote progress in these areas, enhancing the generation of a rigorous evidence base, and
ensuring that this is widely accessible to actors at the interface between knowledge, policy formulation
and implementation, is clearly a critical tool worthy of more systematic investment and monitoring.

16
4. Links between knowledge and policy processes relevant to child
rights
Having surveyed trends in the evolution of knowledge generated about children and children’s rights,
we now turn to discuss how this knowledge is utilised in policy processes. Accordingly, this section
focuses on knowledge management and the ideas, actors and processes involved in translating
knowledge into policy-resonant messages. The discussion is informed by a comparative perspective,
looking at efforts to mainstream gender in order to highlight strengths and weaknesses of child rights-
related efforts to date.

4.1 Knowledge management

Broadly defined, knowledge management refers to efforts to capture and share both tacit and codified
forms of knowledge so that it is accessible to end-users.

‘Raw information may be widely available to a number of agencies, but only some organisations will
be able to convert the information into relevant knowledge and to use this knowledge to achieve
their aims. The processes by which they do this are known as Knowledge Management strategies’
(Hovland, 2003).

Approaches to knowledge management tend to vary, from the systematic to the ad hoc, and while we
would hypothesise that more systematic approaches are likely to lead to the development of better
policies and programmes, there has been limited empirical exploration in this area. In particular,
determination and measurement of ‘impact’ in terms of knowledge production and use are largely
limited or incoherent (Ferguson et al., 2008). Nonetheless, we focus our discussion on networks,
institutions and databases established to promote better information and knowledge sharing on child
rights, and provide a brief overview of their relative strengths and weaknesses in terms of knowledge
management. We also briefly discuss the knowledge management approaches of a select number of
major international NGOs.

4.1.1 Child Rights Information Network

One of the leading global information networks for children’s rights is the Child Rights Information
Network (CRIN). Established in 1995, it currently provides publications, research and information to
over 2100 organisations across 150 countries. Its aims are to support the implementation of the UNCRC,
address the information needs of those working for child rights and support the development of
information systems and information exchange. The network also facilitates coordination between
governments, activists, NGOs and UN agencies on child rights issues and provides additional support
where necessary to encourage effective advocacy. CRIN is supported by UNICEF, Save the Children
Sweden, Save the Children UK and the International Save the Children Alliance. The majority of its
members are NGOs and in the South (Khan, 2001).

To get a grasp of the relative depth and breadth of information currently available on child-related
issues, as well as any patterns existing, we carried out a simple mapping exercise on the basis of a
sample of CRIN publications, according to the following criteria: 1) 2008-2009 publications; 2) English-
language sources; 3) ‘any publication type’ (excluding websites); and 4) relevance to the following four
UNCRC themes: survival, development, views of the child and protection. 12 A fifth theme, HIV/AIDS, was

12 Survival: Children and health; Development: Children and education and Education; Child views: Children and
participation; Protection: Child labour and working children, Sexual exploitation of children, Children and violence, Children in
conflict with the law, Discrimination, Armed conflict; HIV/AIDS: Children living with HIV/AIDS and HIV/AIDS. A further selection
was made to exclude from the outcome of the search general publications that hindered the possibility of identifying common
patterns of issues (e.g. resources with lack of focus on a specific theme).

17
added in conformity with UNICEF’s organisational categorisation of five focus areas (UNICEF, 2009a). 13
For each of the five themes, the resources were then classified according to a number of more specific
issues. The results of the mapping exercise have been consolidated into graphic form and are shown in
Figures 2 to 13 (Appendix 2). Given the wide range of topics and themes encompassed, and the even
greater number of resources published on the CRIN website, the aim is far from that of informing
scientifically, but rather offering food for thought on the relative strengths and gaps in this field.

Overall, a large proportion of publications lies in the field of ‘Protection’ (56%). 14 ‘Development’
represents 19%, followed by ‘Survival’ (14%) and ‘HIV/AIDS’ and ‘Voices of children’, which together
account for approximately 11% of the total.

Protection encompasses issues of child labour, followed by sexual abuse, discrimination, corporal
punishment, juvenile justice and trafficking. A number of resources have a gender focus, especially
those related to sexual abuse and violence in schools. Most resources focus on Europe, the Middle
East and North Africa (MENA) region (especially the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT)) and Asia.

Development publications focus on education, with most addressing the issue of ethnic minorities in
schools. A large number cover education in emergencies, right to education and sexuality education
(including HIV/AIDS preventive education). A few present a gender focus (specifically vis-à-vis violence
in schools). There is almost equal coverage of Africa, Asia and the MENA region, with Latin America and
Oceania in the minority. The majority of information has a general focus.

Survival encompasses resources on children and health. There is a surprising dearth of resources
focused on water and sanitation. 15 The majority of resources cover a scattered range of topics (ranging
across UNICEF’s State of Children’s Health reports, child-focused situation analyses and surveys). There
is nonetheless a noticeable trend of publications focused on child health in emergencies, food security
and malnutrition, child mortality and maternal/neonatal health. Most publications are not focused on a
specific country or region, although MENA and Africa are the most covered in our sample.

HIV/AIDS contains an equal share of publications focused on access to treatment for HIV/AIDS and
global reports. Slightly fewer in number, but more specific, are the remaining resources, which include
analyses of approaches to address the epidemic, children who are forced to look after HIV/AIDS-
affected household members, sexuality education/information in schools and child views on services
and education. Most resources focus on Africa, although almost half are not country focused.

Child views is the least represented category, although major coverage of juvenile justice issues is
noticeable and, to a lesser extent, training guides to enhance child participation. There is an equal (and
low) share of publications across Europe, Africa and Asia, with a large portion of general resources (i.e.
lacking country focus).

4.1.2 Electronic Development and Environment Information System

The Electronic Development and Environment Information System (Eldis) is a service coordinated by the
University of Sussex (UK), focused primarily on free of charge, point of service maintenance and
delivery of evidence-based knowledge. The service also includes facilities providing country profile,
jobs and announcements – the latter including funding and training opportunities. It divides its
resources section between guides and broader entry-level dossiers, thereby covering specific research
and policy issues, as well as introductions and contextual background with recommended reading.
With core funding from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), the

13 Young child survival and development (nutrition, health, water and sanitation); Basic education and gender equality;
HIV/AIDS and children; Child protection from violence, exploitation and abuse; and Policy advocacy and partnerships for
children’s rights.
14 Corresponding to a total of 145 publications.
15 CRIN provides no such theme to search from ex ante.

18
Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), the Swiss Agency for Development and
Cooperation (SDC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID), and a consistent
commitment to ‘evidence-based’ approaches, there are no particular statements of intention relating to
specific medium- or long-term goals, or embeddedness in universal conventions or principles.

Of the 35 general categories, ranging from aid and agriculture through to participation and trade policy,
children feature twice: first under the category of ‘children and young people’ and second under
‘trafficking of women and children’. Within each of these categories, there are crosscutting links
providing further access to a range of child-related issues and sector-specific guides. With an overall
stock of 1800 editorially selected papers specifically on children and youth, Eldis provides a valuable
tool to access well-constructed research – both formal and of the informal ‘grey’ variety.

On the other hand, without a specific section focusing on policy processes and implementation, the
Eldis site does not provide a dedicated space for the research or discussion of the particular dynamics
at play in child-centred policy processes. Although this may be understandable given the vanguard
nature of knowledge and policy research linkages, this remains a notable gap in a policy area that has
idiosyncratic characteristics – such as multidimensionality, an established convention (UNCRC) and
M&E constraints.

4.1.3 DevInfo
DevInfo is an innovative initiative in terms of providing knowledge management services for child-
related information. The UN system at national and global levels is responsible for supporting national
efforts to monitor the MDGs and other national priorities. A number of approaches and software tools
have been established to help improve data collection, analysis and application for evidence-based
policy development. Among these, DevInfo was endorsed by the UN in 2002 under the auspices of
UNICEF.

This is a free and downloadable system that allows users to organise, store and display data in a
uniform format. It allows for querying and production of a number of ‘presentation objects’, including
tables, maps and graphs, with the long-term vision of setting universal standards for data storage,
access and dissemination. DevInfo is thus claimed to be a powerful advocacy tool, allowing national
entities to use what should ultimately become an integrated and shared database across government
departments and UN agencies.

DevInfo is a database of human development indicators and provides a number of advantages over
previous meta-data packages: data transfer is harmonised and more efficiently transferable;
maintenance is decentralised and duplication reduced, lowering administrative costs significantly;
data have a quality standard and will be available on a more timely and consistent basis; the motor of
data development is shifted from ‘push’ to ‘pull’; and a range of information system platforms can
support the datasets (Rossel-Cambier et al., 2007).

The number of countries using DevInfo increased from one (India) in 1999 to 134 in 2009. Of these,
36% are in the African region, 21% in Asia, 13% in Europe, 24% in the Americas, 9% in the Middle East
and 2% in Oceania. In 2009, 285 adaptations of DevInfo took place, although these have been limited
in scope, mainly the inclusion of specific socioeconomic indicators or customising the name of the
system, images, graphics, logos and the colour scheme. Adaptations can also comprise the inclusion
of a number of indicators for monitoring specific issues: UNICEF, for example, has adapted DevInfo on
child protection from violence, exploitation and abuse (Child protection), on key HIV/AIDS indicators
(Evidence to action) and on gender statistics (Gender info).

DevInfo is not a source of information per se. In fact, it is strictly dependent on the existence of a ready
and reliable database. This reflects key weaknesses of existing initiatives measuring child well-being,
particularly the heavy reliance on pre-existing sources of data as opposed to creation of new and more
tailored information. Therefore, although it is a significant effort towards the standardisation of

19
monitoring tools, DevInfo does not address the issue of information quality, with regard to which
parallel efforts at the country level must be encouraged. Moreover, users do not have access to whole
datasets, which limits use for quantitative analysis, in particular multivariate and causal analysis.

4.1.4 UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre

The Innocenti Research Centre (IRC) was created in 1988 to strengthen UNICEF’s research and advocacy
capabilities. It plays a key role in interfacing between fieldwork experience, international experts,
research networks and policymakers, as well as generating new knowledge: indeed, over time, the
focus has been shifting towards greater emphasis on knowledge brokering and external engagements
(UNICEF, 2005b). This is exemplified in the 2006-2008/09 strategic programme goals of ‘promotion of
the exchange and brokering of knowledge to support reflection, debate and cross-fertilization of
experiences’ (UNICEF, 2005d), and is demonstrated in practice through the Monitoring Eastern Europe
(MONEE) programme. This latter has recognised that it is not only availability and quality of data that
need improvement but also their use and accessibility. Consequently, the IRC has encouraged
increased emphasis on longer-term capacity building on uses of data for policy advocacy by stimulating
dialogue between national statistics offices, relevant government ministries and research centres
(UNICEF, 2009b). More generally, policies on brokering include ‘organizing and facilitating expert
discussions and information exchange with academic and research institutions’ and ‘providing
strategic and technical support to national independent institutions for children’s rights, including
promoting their cooperation through the Global Network of Ombudspersons for Children’ (UNICEF,
2005b).

Naturally, there is some (although not striking) resonance with these approaches within the UNICEF
Medium-Term Strategic Plan (2006-2009) (UNICEF, 2005c). The ultimate aim of UNICEF’s knowledge
management policy is to raise the profile of ‘knowledge’, to include it as a key contribution to achieving
the MDGs and to promote a culture of learning within the organisation. These goals are broadly
addressed through four measures: giving greater attention to strengthening UNICEF’s internal systems,
structures and practices in order to learn from field experience; identifying significant knowledge gaps
(and allocating resources for studies to address them); promoting pilot programmes; and enhancing
research quality.

4.1.5 University-based research centres

Given differing incentive structures, such knowledge management practices are less obvious in
research centres based in university systems. The UK, for instance, has prominent child-oriented
centres in the Townsend Centre (University of Bristol), the Interdisciplinary Centre for Child and Youth
Focused Research (Brunel University), the Child and Youth Studies Group (Open University), the Child
Studies Unit (King’s College London) and the Young Lives child poverty project at Queen Elizabeth
House, Oxford. However, there is little substantive content on knowledge management strategies and
processes. The Interdisciplinary Centre for Child and Youth Focused Research, for instance, funded by
UNICEF (among others), promotes ‘interdisciplinary collaboration in the design, conduct and
dissemination of research’, paired with the Norwegian Centre for Child Research at the Norwegian
University of Science and Technology.

However, the Centre provides no freely available knowledge management platform or system, despite
having access to the Centre for Information and Knowledge Management within the same institution.
Similarly, the Townsend Centre has worked with UNICEF on the global poverty and disparities database,
but has not allocated any external communications space for knowledge management. In practice, a
range of publications are available but these are not actively promoted to target audiences, with a
resulting tendency to isolate or trap outputs at their point of origin. Understanding knowledge
management as a system that goes beyond the storage, organisation and presentation of knowledge
toward promoting communication and interaction is a mandatory step in bridging child research and
child policy audiences. COPs, for instance, have demonstrated significant value in three key ways:
ensuring that research is relevant and innovative; supporting and driving policy networks; and creating

20
‘discourse coalitions’ that build a common language between research and policy communities (Hearn
and White, 2009).

The Child Migration Research Network (CMRN), funded by DFID and the Rockefeller Foundation, was
developed out of research and discussions in the Development Research Centre on Migration,
Globalisation and Poverty, and is coordinated from the University of Sussex, UK. Its core aims are to
focus on the grey literature and other isolated research in order to expand the evidence base on the
effects of migration on children. The themes addressed by the network are ‘independent child
migration’, ‘children left behind’ and ‘migration with families’. There are additional sub-themes and
tertiary themes, such as South–South interactions and rural–urban flows, each of which demonstrates
a unique focus on children as the key actors – highlighting their voices and experiences in order to
capture high levels of complexity.

Ostensibly, the CMRN exists for ‘promoting policies to maximise the benefits and minimise the risks of
migration for poor people’, but the functionality of the CMRN site remains dedicated to the supply side
of the knowledge management cycle, with no clear section emphasising policy processes and/or their
dynamics. The CMRN does provide linkages to such research (see Thomas, 2009), but the particular
roles of certain actors and contexts in promoting or preventing efficient child-based knowledge
management practices is not a high-profile feature in the network.

4.1.6 Child-focused international NGOs

Although prominent child-oriented development NGOs such as Save the Children, World Vision, Plan
and Kindernothilfe have varied knowledge management structures, the sector standard is based on
documenting methodologies, strategies and outcomes into thematic categories and crosscutting
issues for internal purposes, while providing specified learning externally for COPs. To this end, a range
of publications are available that can be classified by geography, theme, publication type and date (up
to five years). However, specific knowledge management strategies or procedures such as data-
gathering methodologies, and best practice on lesson learning, capture, communication and storage,
are rarely made available. Child-focused monitoring and assessment toolkits are periodically made
public, but such initiatives, as with many similar M&E activities in non-child focus areas, fail to provide
a comprehensive approach to knowledge management that monitors and addresses barriers to
effective production and use of research (Talisayon, 2009).

The case in Box 3 is indicative of the type of process that is presented in other forums (in this case the
UN Office for Humanitarian Affairs website) but not consistently disseminated on participant websites.

Box 3: The need for a knowledge management stream in the Inter-Agency

Network for Emergencies
Education clusters have been established in a number of countries to help ensure that children have access to
education during emergencies and to share best practice. There are cluster representatives at regional and
district levels as well, and leads generally consist of actors in UN agencies, international and national NGOs and
the Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies Secretariat.

The need for a consistent knowledge management system in the Education Cluster Working Group was
recognised in 2009, to improve institutional memory, coordination and handovers. The Knowledge Management
Task Team aims to establish mechanisms to address the fact that, although the need for accurate assessment of
data is significant, tools and processes to develop initial assessments of education facilities in emergency
contexts are largely lacking. The role of the team is to design and develop a comprehensive and standardised
system, consistent with Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies standards, to guide emergency
responses and the capture of best practices.
Source: http://www.humanitarianreform.org/humanitarianreform.

21
Table 1: Overview of key English-language initiatives for measuring child well-
being
Initiative Institution Timeframe Description
IRC Report Card 7 UNICEF IRC Report Provides a full evaluation of the lives and
published in well-being of children and youth living in the
An overview of child 2007 but part of 21 industrialised nations and allows
well-being in rich a broader comparisons not just on income poverty but
countries: a series: 2005 on also along six differing dimensions: material
comprehensive poverty; 2008 well-being, health and safety, education, peer
assessment of the on early and family relationships, behaviours and risks
lives and well-being of childhood care; and young people’s own subjective sense of
children and 2010 will focus well-being. Scores indicate how far above or
adolescents in the on social below the OECD average each country stands.
economically exclusion Each dimension is captured by a variety of
advanced nations indicators, which have been collapsed into
three equally weighted components: material
http://www.unicef- well-being – percentage relatively poor,
irc.org/publications/p percentage living in households without an
df/rc7_eng.pdf employed adult, reported direct measures of
deprivation; health and safety – infant health,
vaccination rates, childhood accidental death
rate; education – school achievement at age
15, percentage remaining in school after 15,
transition from school to work; relationships –
indicators measuring family structure, time
spent with parents, quality of friendships;
behaviours and risks – a great many
indicators, collapsed into components that
capture health behaviours, risk behaviours
and violence; subjective sense of well-being –
whether children report being satisfied with
their health, their school experience and
themselves.

Data for this report are largely drawn from the

World Health Organization (WHO) Health
Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC)
study, Programme for International Student
Assessment (PISA) and WHO.
Multi-National Project Center for Phase I Brought together 80 diverse experts from
for Monitoring and Research and 1996-2000 nearly 30 countries to define the concept of
Measuring Children’s Public Education, child well-being and identify measures to
Well-Being National Council Phase II capture the concept that move beyond mere
for the Child, 2001-2005 survival. Phase I, which was coordinated by
http://multinational- Israel the Israeli National Council for the Child,
indicators.chapinhall. identified five domains of child well-being,
org/ Chapin Hall captured by approximately 60 indicators.
Center for Domains (and sub-domains) identified were:
This project Children at the children’s economic resources and
culminated in the University of contribution (macroeconomic and
foundation of the Chicago intergenerational distributive justice,
International Society children’s autonomy, expenditure on children
for Child Indicators and access to resources), children’s personal
(ISCI) life skills (interpersonal, intrapersonal and
National Center academic skills and resources), children's
http://www.childindic for Children in civil life skills (community activities,
ators.org/goals.html Poverty, opportunities for community activities and

22
 Initiative Institution Timeframe Description
Columbia community values), children’s safety and
University health status (safety and physical status) and
children’s activity.
German Youth
Institute Phase II had as its goals to build a ‘reliable
and valid scientific protocol for collecting new
data, to build a collaborative multinational
network of partners, to develop an archive of
data collected and to build a strategic plan for
disseminating the knowledge gained’. 16

Phase II successfully culminated in 2006 with

the creation of ISCI.
Global Study on Child UNICEF 2007-2009 Involved an analysis of household survey data
Poverty and from over 40 countries in seven regions. It
Disparities Townsend Centre looked at lacunae in national poverty
for International reduction strategies, which included
http://www.unicef.org Poverty Research employment, economics, demographics,
/socialpolicy/index_4 expenditures, fiscal space and foreign aid, in
5357.html order to identify how policies could reduce
child deprivation. The study used definitions
http://www.bris.ac.uk of poverty that included both income and non-
/poverty/ income factors and considered how
inadequate resources are perceived
differently by children of varying genders,
ages, social statuses and household
constructions. It utilised a lifecycle approach
and placed high value on a caring
environment as a key requirement for
children’s well-being.

The study produced internationally

comparable figures for poverty, nutrition,
health, education and child protection. Data
included Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys
(MICS) and demographic and health surveys
(DHS).
Institute for IDASA Monitoring IDASA works with NGOs around Africa to
Democracy in Africa Government facilitate child-sensitive budgeting. It clearly
(IDASA) Budgets to lays out for stakeholders the rights of children
Advance Child as identified in the UNCRC, the roles of
http://www.idasa.org. Rights – A Guide players in children’s rights and the
za/index.asp?page=o to NGOs was obligations of each role player to ensuring
utput_details.asp%3F published in those rights. It provides practical advice on
RID%3D508%26TID%3 2003 how to identify the budget allocations
D8%26OTID%3D7 dedicated to children’s issues, how to
calculate the percentage of total expenditures
that impact children and how to calculate
nominal growth rates in allocations while
factoring in real growth rates and inflation. It
also provides a framework for information
dissemination.

16 http://multinational-indicators.chapinhall.org/.

23
Cohort studies Centre for • 1946- Ongoing longitudinal studies of all children
• National Survey of Longitudinal present born in England, Scotland and Wales during
Health and Studies • 1958- one particular week of the target year (the
Development present 2001 cohort had different collection criteria
• National Child • 1970- and covered, for the first time, the entire UK).
Development present Every seven years the cohorts are traced and
Study • 2001- data are collected on the physical,
• British Cohort present educational, social and economic
Study development of each member. Cohorts have
• Millennium Cohort been augmented to include immigrants who
Study were born in the target week. In addition to
interviews with the subjects, parental
http://www.cls.io interviews, teacher questionnaires, medical
e.ac.uk/ exams and psycho-educational testing are
collected. With the exception of the 1946
cohort, which was smaller, each cohort has
involved approximately 17,000 children. The
Millennium cohort was disproportionally
stratified to ensure representation of low-
income and minority areas.
The Child and Youth Duke University 1975-present An evidence-based measure of children’s
Well-Being Index well-being in America. The index allows
composite comparisons over time, as well as
http://www.soc.duke. providing specific trends for different ages,
edu/~cwi/ ethnicities, income levels and genders. The
index uses 28 indicators collapsed into seven
equally weighted domains: family economic
well-being, social relationships, health, safety
and behavioural concerns (crime, smoking,
adolescent pregnancy), educational
attainment (reading and math scores),
emotional well-being and community
connectedness (school attendance,
employment rates). Data utilised by the index
come from many sources, including the US
Census, the US Current Population Survey and
the National Assessment of Educational
Progress.
Child Trends Data Child Trends 1979-present Houses information on over 100 child-related
Bank indicators for US children. Collecting
information from federal and state officials, as
http://www.childtrend well as other researchers, Child Trends staff
sdatabank.org/ work to help public and private agencies
develop and use statistical indicators to
improve the well-being of US children. Data
fall into six domains: health, social and
emotional development, income and assets,
education and skills, demographics and
family and community. Indicators are
continually updated and range from condom
use to the number of children in foster care to
adolescent volunteer participation.

24
Youth in Numbers World Bank Reports Consists of six reports, one for each region in
series published in which the World Bank operates: East Asia and
2004 the Pacific, MENA, Eastern Europe and Central
http://web.worldbank Asia, South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and
.org/WBSITE/EXTERNA Latin America and the Caribbean. The reports
L/TOPICS/EXTCY/0,,m contain tables of statistical indicators that
enuPK:396466~pageP have been collected by multilateral
K:162344~piPK:14909 organisations on the population, education,
0~theSitePK:396445,0 health and employment of young people
0.html around the world.
Demographic Health UN Population Reports have Utilise data drawn primarily from the DHS and
Surveys Adolescent Fund (UNFPA) been published aim to arm stakeholders with country-level
Data Guides since 2002 data on youth aged 10-24. Reports are
available for nearly 50 developing countries
http://www.unfpa.org and aim to highlight the lacunae between
/adolescents/dhs_ad investment and need. While programmes are
olescent_guides.html available for the most advantaged of the
world’s youth, including those who are male,
in school, living in urban areas and
unmarried, those most in need are often
statistically invisible.
Child Labour Data Statistical Briefs published SIMPOC, the statistical arm of IPEC, aids more
Country Briefs Information and in 2008 than 60 countries in the collection and
Monitoring analysis of data relevant to child labour. To
http://www.ilo.org/ip Programme on date, more than 250 surveys, 60 of them on a
ec/Childlabourstatisti Child Labour national scale, have been carried out. Child
csSIMPOC/lang-- (SIMPOC) Labour Data Country Briefs have been
en/index.htm (International produced for nearly 20 nations.
Programme on
the Elimination
of Child Labour –
IPEC – of the
International
Labour
Organization –
ILO)
Child Development Save the Children Uses data from Combines each country’s performance in
Index UK 1990 to present three child-specific areas to produce a score
scaled from 0 to 100. Scores are produced for
http://www.savethech more than 140 countries around the world and
ildren.org.uk/en/docs are composed of equally weighted indicators
/child-development- measuring child health, child nutrition and
index.pdf education. Given that data are not collected
annually in all countries, there are currently
three sets of scores available: 1990-1994,
1995-1999 and 2000-2006. Low scores
represent low levels of child deprivation. A
score of zero, for example, would indicate that
all children survive to their fifth birthday and
are well fed and all primary school children
are enrolled in school. The index provides an
interesting counterpoint to the UN’s Human
Development Index and differences clearly
indicate that children’s well-being is not
necessarily tied to adult well-being.

25
Index of Child Well- Social Policy 2006 Composed of 51 individual indicators
being in the European Research Unit collapsed into 23 components and then eight
Union equally weighted domains: material situation,
J. Bradshaw, housing, health, subjective well-being,
http://www.camhee.e P. Hoelscher and education, relationships, civic participation
u/images/default/sou D. Richardson and risk and safety. It uses a rights-based
rce/attachments/usef approach to analyse existing data, including
ul/AN%20INDEX%20O surveys such as HBSC and PISA as well as
F%20CHILD%20WELL- series from the WHO and World Bank, on the
BEING%20IN%20THE European Union 25 (EU-25). The index
%20EUROPEAN.pdf attempted to use the child as the unit of
analysis and excluded indicators not
available for at least 70% of the countries. For
each of the domains, an average score was
calculated and then countries were ranked
according to their distance above or below
that average.
MICS UNICEF New York Initiated in Developed by UNICEF to fill in data gaps of
1995, with countries vis-à-vis monitoring status of
http://www.childinfo. survey rounds children and women (made a priority
org/mics3_backgroun every five years following the 1990 World Summit for
d.html Children). MICS are typically carried out by
governmental organisations with the support
of UNICEF and other partners and present
three core questionnaires: 1) household, 2)
women aged 15-49 and 3) children under five.
This makes the survey stand out against the
majority of sources of data – European School
Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs
(ESPAD), HBSC, PISA, Trends in International
Mathematics and Science Studies Matrix
(TIMSS) surveys – which tend to focus on late
childhood as opposed to early childhood
(ages 0-5 years) or middle school (6-11) (Ben-
Arieh, 2006; Bradshaw et al., 2006). The three
‘standard’ questionnaires can be customised
to the data needs of a country. MICS3, for
example, includes a set of optional modules
encompassing issues of disability, child
discipline, security of tenure and durability of
housing, source and cost of supplies for
insecticide-treated nets and maternal
mortality (household questionnaire); unmet
need, security of tenure and attitudes toward
domestic violence (women questionnaire);
child development and source and cost of
supplies of oral rehydration solution,
antibiotics and anti-malarials (children
questionnaire).

26
 HBSC HBSC is housed 1982-present A multinational, school-based study that uses
at the University a common protocol to collect data on health-
http://www.hbsc.org/ of Edinburgh and related attitudes and behaviours of nationally
is undertaken in representative samples of youth in up to 43
collaboration countries. Data collection began in 1983, with
with the WHO new waves every four years. Approximately
4500 young people, aged 11, 13 and 15, are
included in each survey in each participating
country. The surveys include information on
demographics, individual and social
resources, health behaviours and health
outcomes.
National Longitudinal Economic and 2007-present This survey, also known as ‘Growing Up in
Study of Children in Social Research Ireland’, is monitoring the development of
Ireland Institute, Trinity more than 18,000 Irish children with the goal
College Dublin of identifying the factors that impact their
http://www.childinfo. well-being. The study includes two cohorts,
org/mics3_backgroun one of infants and one of nine-year-old
d.html children, and will track them for seven years,
gathering data on the social, economic and
cultural environments of contemporary Irish
children. The first wave of data collection was
completed in early 2009 and work is
underway on the first main report.

4.2 Knowledge translation – actors, ideas and processes

Having provided a brief overview of some key knowledge management initiatives in the field of child
rights, we now turn to discuss the actors, ideas and processes involved in transforming ideas and
evidence related to child rights into policy- and practice-relevant concepts and guidelines. We draw on
the CIHR definition of knowledge translation as ‘a dynamic and iterative process that includes the
synthesis, dissemination, exchange and ethically sound application of knowledge’. 17

4.2.1 Actors
Earlier work on the knowledge–policy interface was dominated by notions of ‘divided communities’,
with researchers and policymakers divided in terms of their professional incentive structures and
priorities, such that evidence-informed policy processes were deemed challenging, or even unlikely.
According to this argument, while researchers privilege quality of evidence, regardless of the time it
takes to generate, and theoretically informed analysis, policymakers tend to be more pragmatic,
demanding timely, context-specific information that resonates with intuition and is politically feasible
(Court and Young, 2006). However, the range of actors linking knowledge, policy and practice has
become increasingly diverse, and actors are now playing more fluid roles (Culpeper, 2008; Stone,
2008). As such, there is an increasing focus on networks and COPs (Court et al., 2005) 18 as a key way in
which tacit knowledge is managed within organisations and knowledge fields. COPs are informal
groups or networks of professionals who share common problems, interests or knowledge and who
communicate with each other about this. Their core competency is that they can enable a learning
conversation and nurture capacities of members (see also Box 4).

17 www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html.
18 The literature refers to a range of such networks and communities, including issue networks, epistemic communities,
advocacy coalitions and global public policy networks (see Lindquist, 2001).

27
In the field of child rights in developing country contexts, knowledge translation efforts have
increasingly been shaped by COPs over the past 10 to 15 years, as highlighted by Table 4 in Appendix 2.
As with our analysis of CRIN, COPs in the field of child protection largely outnumber those active in the
other fields, although interestingly this is a field that has received less attention in global monitoring
systems as well as being relatively less covered in the academic literature on child well-being in
developing countries.

Box 4: Key ingredients in communities of practice

Key elements of COPs include the following:

• Purpose – shared purpose or passion; shared needs and clear value potential. Scott Peck (1987) describes
various stages of COPs: pseudo-communities (people remain at the level of politeness); chaos (people
decide they need to defend their views); emptiness (people empty themselves of the desire to change
others); and community building.
• Enablers include technology, time, budget, support and incentives.
• Leadership of the community to facilitate the weaving of the threads of emerging conversations to overcome
possible fragmentation.
• Processes – people may want to use different means of communicating, which is why flexible
communication strategies are as important as storytelling and learning conversations.
• Individual agency – competencies, affinities, commitment, behaviours and diversity of perspectives are all
elements that people bring to COPs.
• Time (cited as an enabler) is a key issue.
Source: Ramalingam (2005).

Most of the COPs analysed 19 are undergoing growth, and all are active in the two initial stages of the
policy cycle: framing debates/agenda setting and encouraging discursive commitments from states
and policy actors. 20 However, the focus appears to be largely one of information sharing, with only a
handful having formalised their efforts into concrete policy documents: for instance, the Global Water,
Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Campaign, the Joint Learning Initiative on Children and HIV/AIDS (JLICA)
and the African Child Policy Forum (ACPF). Very few appear to have reached a maturity that has allowed
them to extend their influence to the following stages of the policy cycle (securing procedural changes
from policy actors, effecting policy change and changing the behaviour of target actors). Important
exceptions include End Child Prostitution, Pornography and Trafficking (ECPAT), which contributed to
the 2006 UN World Report on Violence against Children (UN, 2006b); the World Congress III against
Sexual Exploitation of Children and Adolescents; and ANDI, the child rights-focused Latin American
News Agency for Children’s Rights, which has contributed to a significant shift in reporting on child
rights.

4.2.2 Ideas and their policy purchase

A second key dimension of knowledge translation is the extent to which different types of ideas or
frameworks used to conceptualise child rights have had effective purchase on policy and practice. Here
we consider a sub-sample of such ideas: development psychology, rights-based approaches and
sociology of childhood all represent key conceptual frameworks that have been used to understand
children and childhood across the years (see also Section 2 and Table 5, Appendix 2).

Development psychology paradigms are based on a universalistic concept of the child, who develops
through identifiable stages. Although this approach has been criticised for its assumption of the
existence of universal characteristics (Morrow, 2006), stage theories have long been the basis for
understanding children and, as such, have had a substantive impact on childhood policy and practice.

19 See Table 4 in Appendix 1 for selected COPs and their respective stages/impacts.
20 See discussion on Keck and Sikkink’s (1998) framework in Jones and Villar (2008).

28
Moreover, they still largely reflect the basis for practitioners currently working with children across
disciplines and professions, as well as the ways in which social policies about children are formulated.
For instance, the importance that stage theories still enjoy is reflected in continued assessment of the
extent that children have or have not ‘achieved’ in relation to school curricula or agendas (ibid).

The rights-based framework, promoted through the UNCRC and its three ‘Ps’, partly moves away from
this risk of ‘essentialising’ childhood, and some argue that recognising children’s right to participate
may reflect the beginning of an altered construction of childhood (Jefferess, 2002). Nevertheless, by
failing to interrogate the meaning of the ‘child’ and ‘childhood’ (the UNCRC merely states that any
person under age 18 is a child), the Convention still partly reflect the limits of stage theories, in
referring to a universal, immature child who is on a particular developmental trajectory and in need of
protection.

Other concerns relate to the tendency within child rights discourses to associate children with
education and adults with work, reflecting dominant (Western) conceptions that implicitly question the
values of societies in which children are contributors to household economies (Fernando, 2001). Such
understandings of childhood also tend to overlook issues of power relations affecting children: the
particularisation of children’s rights issues, isolated from class, race, and gender, is conceived by some
as a way of avoiding direct engagement with the political and economic realities of the emerging global
economy (ibid).

Common application of the rights-framed approach derived from the UNCRC includes, among others,
birth registration policies in developing countries, anti-child labour legislation and national
development plans ‘informed’ by children views, strengthening of juvenile justice systems as well as
policies on fostering, adoption and guardianship. Meanwhile, the right of the child to be protected,
including from harmful forms of child labour, has turned out to be more complex than initially
envisaged. Research has called for caution regarding anti-child labour legislation, insofar as it may risk
undermining children’s right to protection in some contexts by obscuring situations in which children
are actually exploited (Jacquemin, 2006).

The risks implied in the formal and apparently neutral application of such legislation have been
illustrated in contexts where models of child labour coexist in the forms of unpaid work in households
of family members (‘little nieces’), exploitation in households with no kinship ties (‘hired help’) and
domestic labour, which seldom benefits from labour laws (‘little waged maid’). 21 In such contexts, the
effectiveness of development programmes targeting domestic servants in a children’s rights-based
approach has had to be revisited. Targeting non-kin paid maids under 15 assumes that the family is the
ideal place for children to live, but ends up neglecting the ‘little nieces’ – while simultaneously failing
to consider the potential protection and livelihood benefits that the maids derive from informal labour
remuneration (Hashim, 2005). Formalising effective policy implications of a rights-based approach to
child labour thus seems to require an understanding that the application of official regulations
concerning minimum age of employment does not necessarily translate into protection of working
children. In a context of diversified forms of child domestic labour, targeting has the disadvantage of
overshadowing children who are not included as ‘targets’.

It has also been argued that legislation such as the ILO international ban on the worst forms of child
labour, including drug trafficking, underground mining, prostitution, etc, may not be the best option to
fight child labour, as it could end up having a negative effect on family well-being, given that it
addresses the symptoms as opposed to the causes of harmful forms of child labour, such as poverty
(Dessy and Pallage, 2005). Moreover, evidence from Bangladesh suggests the detrimental effects that
a Bill presented in the US in 1993 and aimed at eliminating children from the workplace can have. By
failing to address the socioeconomic realities of working children, the Child Labor Deterrence Act 1993,

21 Jacquemin (2006) refers specifically to Côte d’Ivoire, but such practices are widespread in West and Central Africa.

29
which proposed a ban on imports to the US from countries using child labour in the production of
goods for international markets, risked creating incentives for children to engage in more hazardous
and exploitative jobs in the informal sector (Rahman et al., 1999).

Child participation has been encouraged in the field of education and is receiving increasing attention
in national development processes. Major concerns with regard to the participation of children include
paternalistic traditional models of children’s needs that are built on adult knowledge and perceptions
(Jones and Sumner, 2009). There are also questions as to the assumption that children are able to
participate and articulate ideas that resonate with questions being addressed in sophisticated
development strategies, as well as the appropriateness of encouraging participation in contexts where
resources are lacking (ibid). Perhaps most importantly, effective policy purchase of the views of the
child in development policies remains an empirical matter. Evidence from Vietnam, for instance,
suggests weak impact of child participation in the development of the Social and Economic
Development Plan (2006-2010), with the final version presenting no specific section on child rights,
children or childhood poverty, despite the opportunities that the broader Doi Moi economic and
political reform process had opened up for consultation with children (Nguyen et al., forthcoming).
Similarly, in Kenya, although children from across the country were consulted, the PRSP document
integrated only a limited number of their insights and did not embrace a holistic, child-rights informed
approach to poverty reduction (Heidel, 2005). Indeed:

‘Even though many national poverty reduction strategies mention the needs of young people, often
these strategies are limited in their analysis of the situation of youth and many national
development plans lack consideration of differences in young people’s needs, realities, obstacles,
priorities, and opportunities’ (ADAP, 2009).

Sociology of childhood reflects an understanding of children’s experiences as extremely varied, as

opposed to a universal norm (Prout, 2004). As we have seen, Boyden and Levison (2000) argue that,
while certain aspects of childhood are indeed universal, with unquestionable needs such as food, rest
and sleep, as well as certain commonalities in cognitive development, such as the acquisition of
language, the notion of children developing in stages that occur universally in a fixed sequence is not
sustainable. According to the sociology of childhood framework, childhood must be reconceived as a
political issue, acknowledging that theories about what children need and how they develop are all
derived from adult perspectives (James and James, 1999). ‘Sociologising childhood’ implies conceiving
of children as competent social actors who can alter the conditions of their own lives, whose wishes
and needs are relevant to the construction of social policies but whose ability to participate risks being
heavily controlled and subordinated by adulthood (Mayall, 2000). This is a challenge, given the large
body of knowledge on child development that has contributed to building Western dominant
conceptions of children as incompetent, unreliable and unstable (ibid). The sociology of childhood also
takes seriously the notion of the ‘generational order’, whereby it is recognised that the categorisation
of societal members by age is not a natural distinction but rather socially constructed and deeply
connected to other dimensions of social inequality (Alanen and Mayall, 2001).

Policy implications include questioning the extent that government initiatives are based on evidence of
or assumptions about gender, ethnicity and social status (Morrow, 2006). Although it has been argued
that children as a category has remained insufficiently differentiated (Morrow and Connolly, 2006),
intergenerational bargaining theories – and their implications, including policies of indirect targeting –
have been critical to an understanding that children occupy a special relational category within the
household, which can be uniquely affected by specific policies. There is a broad literature on mothers
investing additional household income in their children’s welfare, whereas fathers are more likely to
invest in income-generating activities and personal needs (Kabeer, 2003). However, generational
dynamics within the household are increasingly emerging as more complex, including differences
among different age categories of children and links between not only parents and children but also
grandparents and children. For instance, some studies have found that, as children’s share in the
family income increases, family expenditures change to favour children of that same age group (12-18),

30
while the share of expenditure going to other groups, including younger children, decreases (Moehling,
1997, in Boyden and Levison, 2000). Moreover, there is suggestive evidence from Brazil that the
presence of an elderly man in the family can improve children’s education (Ponczek, in Reynolds,
2008) and research in South Africa (Duflo, 2003) has highlighted how pension receipts by
grandmothers can have a positive effect on granddaughters’ nutrition status. 22 Notwithstanding gaps in
coverage (e.g. girls or boys without a living grandparent) and the ethical questions inevitably raised by
policies from which some are (by chance) excluded, indirect targeting, such as targeting of
grandparents to help grandchildren, may thus be an effective way of enacting policy.

Overall, however, the sociology of childhood framework has not had significant traction in the policy
world. It has been argued, for instance, that language used by those advocating for children is affected
by ‘gender neglect’, which discriminates against children by referring to them as an object (‘it’) (e.g.
Saunders and Goddard, 2001). Similarly, the relatively few provisions that exist in England, for
example, on the protection of children’s interests in the absence of a marriage contract between
parents are suggestive of legislation that is supportive of a model that fails to cater for all children
(such as those whose parents are not married but who might equally be in dispute) (James and James,
1999). Moreover, despite innovations in legislation that have brought children centre stage in divorce
(the latest expression being the 1989 Children Act), the law seems to foster a particular model of the
child in which ideas of agency are underplayed and their social status relegated as one of subordinate
family members to be heard at the discretion of adults (ibid).

4.2.3 Processes
The policy process has been defined as the sum of the interactions occurring among different
organisations – each with its own interests and ideas – to decide on what course of action should be
taken in a specific sector (Nash et al., 2006). It is part of a wider environment of formal and informal
rules governing the relations among different players, and can be conceptually broken down into two
related interfaces: research–policy, covering the generation and translation of knowledge into policy;
and policy–practice, including the challenge of maximising knowledge impact.

Policymaking is widely recognised as a complex process, with no linear progression linking technical
evidence to policy design to accurate implementation (Young, 2008). The structural constraints are
such that unexpected policy results may in some instances be explained not by inadequate research
per se but rather by the limited responsiveness of research tools and or policy engagement strategies
to the complexities of the policymaking process. The failure of poverty reduction policies, for instance,
is said to be suggestive evidence of this complexity and, more specifically, of the need to challenge
existing biases in policy processes towards reductionist approaches that tend to construct blueprints
to apply across different contexts (Jones et al., 2009a). As such, knowledge translation efforts need to
be informed by an iterative and dynamic understanding of policy and practice change (Figure 14 in
Appendix 2). However, these acknowledgments also need to be supplemented with an awareness and
analysis of the role of political economy in enabling or preventing child-focused policies. Children’s
and youth groups in particular often suffer from capacity constraints to articulate young people’s
perspectives into policy-relevant inputs (Williams, 2004); tend to be accorded low priority, at least in
part because they are non-voters; and are frequently inadequately represented within the bureaucracy
because of resource- and capacity-constrained civil service interlocutors.

From research to policy: The impact of research on policy is explained by a number of factors, starting
from research quality. Considering the complexity of international development, this is increasingly
recognised as encompassing multiple sources of knowledge, including relevant information derived
from development projects as well as more participatory forms of evidence. In child-related
policymaking, for instance, studies are advocating for the adoption of mixed methods approaches,

22 In measuring the impact of the South Africa pension programme on child nutrition (weight for height and height for age),
the paper provides evidence of the collective household model – which allows for different interests within the household.

31
combining traditional quantitative analyses focused on measuring breadth and causes of child poverty
with qualitative analyses addressing intra-household dynamics, as well as children’s experiences and
perceptions of deprivation and vulnerability (Jones and Sumner, 2007).

The involvement of non-state actors can also shape the knowledge–policy interface, but opportunities
for such influence are filtered through the specific contours of particular policy sectors or areas. It is
recognised, for instance, that while trade policies are more likely to be taken behind closed doors
(Newell and Tussie, 2006), policies in the education sector tend to rely on more participative forms of
evidence (Jones and Pomares, forthcoming). Levels of participation in policymaking are affected by a
number of sector-specific variables, including levels of technical expertise required (e.g. fluency in
macroeconomic policy issues is often a prerequisite for participation at the policy dialogue table on
policy responses to economic shocks), levels of influence among economic interests in the sector (e.g.
dominance of private sector groups in trade policy negotiations), levels of contestation within the
sector (e.g. polarisation of the reproductive health field) and levels of internationalisation of policy
discourses (e.g. human rights debates are increasingly shaped by international non-state actors) (Jones
and Pomares, forthcoming). Meanwhile, the limited legitimacy of children’s perspectives in many
societies, alongside weak institutional arrangements, including capacity- and resource-constrained
governmental agencies mandated to address child rights as well as limited space for civil society to
raise child rights issues, appears to limit children’s opportunities to have a say in decision-making
processes affecting them, hampering considerably the influence of evidence on policy in this sector
(Jones and Sumner, 2009).

These sector-specific dynamics between knowledge and policy call for a shift in the boundaries of
analysis, beyond scientific knowledge or quality research into the broader environment of
policymaking. The political context encompasses aspects such as ‘the distribution of power, the range
of organisations involved and their interests, and the formal and informal rules that govern the
interactions among different players’ (Nash et al., 2006). The complexity is such that there is no
straightforward way of predicting the likelihood of successful research-based policymaking on the
basis of a country’s political system. For example, present-day Bolivia, which is characterised by
greater participation in policymaking of non-state actors, has not to date resulted in more evidence-
informed or higher-quality policy dialogues (Jones et al., 2009a). Moreover, the cases of authoritarian
Chile in the 1970s and 1980s and present-day one-party Vietnam suggest that unexpected
opportunities for influencing policymaking rise in countries where political systems are less
competitive. In both instances, research evidence was/is strongly demanded by policy decision
makers, as a means for political leaders to better tackle the growing complexity of globalised policy
environments. It has also been argued that crises or regime changes can foster greater chances for
research to influence policy changes (Macdonald, 2008). Peru is one example, with post-authoritarian
governments showing enthusiasm for research-informed advice (Correa, in Jones et al., 2009a).

Even with quality evidence, active COPs and favourable sector contexts, success still rests in significant
part with the capacity of researchers to understand the political context and, ultimately, to be ‘good
networkers, engineers and political fixers’ (Young, 2008). Effective policy entrepreneurs are able to
map the political context and to frame messages in context- and politics-resonant ways (Keck and
Sikkink, 1998). This means having the ability to ‘package’ messages in ways that are easy for
policymakers to understand and apply, identifying implications without leaving research findings open
to interpretation and making them appropriate in their own context. This may include recognition of the
‘localisation’ of international frameworks in policy debates and according priority to equivalent
national versions, such as the National Action Plan for Ethiopian Children as opposed to the UNCRC in
the case of efforts to ensure the integration of a child rights approach to childhood poverty in Ethiopia’s
second PRSP.

From policy to practice: While studies on the knowledge–policy interface outlined above focus on the
factors that either enable or hinder the likelihood of research take-up by policy, the policy–practice
literature focuses on different types of impacts that evidence-informed policy can have on practice,

32
informed by a recognition of the multiple and multilayered meanings of research influence (Jones and
Sumner 2009). Here, we return to Keck and Sikkink’s framework on the policy–practice interface
derived from their work on transnational advocacy networks, which identifies five key impacts of
evidence-based policy (see also Box 5).

Box 5: Lessons learned from gender mainstreaming initiatives

International policy on gender equality has been shaped by CEDAW in 1979 and the Beijing Platform for Action,
which was the culmination of the high-profile Fourth World Conference on Women in 1995. International
organisations and bilateral development agencies have since been involved in bringing gender perspectives into
regular development activities that do not specifically target women in the first place. In many cases, such
initiatives have been referred to as cases of ‘good start and lost momentum’ (DFID, 2004; Keller et al., 2002;
UNDP, 2006) yet, having a relatively better-established relationship among relevant actors in the policymaking
process, they offer a number of lessons for knowledge translation efforts aimed at encouraging the uptake of new
knowledge on child rights into mainstream development policy and practice.

• Importance of tackling cultural and organisational attitudes: Organisational cultures that are
unsupportive of gender mainstreaming initiatives have proven to be a major institutional challenge (UN
ECOSOC, 2003), resulting in significant gaps between policy commitments and limited resource allocations
(DFID, 2004; UNDP, 2006). Additional limitations include lack of professional gender equality expertise
(Freeman et al., 2002; Mikkelsen et al., 2002) and the ambiguous visibility of gender mainstreaming
structures. For instance, UN Development Program (UNDP) gender focal points have had no clear job
description and are generally junior-level staff (UNDP, 2006).
• Framing debates so they resonate with broader development discourses: There has been a tendency to
equate gender equality narrowly with women’s participation in development programmes and projects (Keller
et al., 2002) or social sectors such as girls’ education and maternal health, at the expense of a broader focus
in the areas of economic opportunities (DFID, 2004). However, more recent efforts, such as the World Bank’s
focus on investing in gender equality initiatives because it constitutes ‘smart economics’ and UNICEF’s call to
capitalise on the ‘double dividend’ – i.e. promote women’s empowerment in order also to achieve better
child outcomes – highlight the power of integrating gender considerations into the core business of existing
development paradigms.
• The importance of systematic data collection and analysis, including M&E efforts: Over the past 20
years, there have been increasing efforts to address the serious gaps in the availability of sex-disaggregated
gender data and indicators of progress that help to mainstream gender issues. Initiatives include UNDP’s
Gender-related Development Index and the Gender Empowerment Index, as well as UN Development Fund for
Women (UNIFEM) data collection on women’s time use in both paid and unpaid work roles. Other key
developments include the OECD-DAC’s gender marker to track official development assistance expenditure
on gender equality objectives and the recent initiative by Germany to introduce a gender marker in its
assessment of all development projects, such that the onus is on project and section leads, to demonstrate
where they think that gender is not relevant before they can receive project and funding approval.
• Mainstreaming as a political exercise: Gender mainstreaming is not merely a technical exercise involving
strategies, methodologies and skills, but encompasses initiatives that must develop links with a variety of
stakeholders, such as NGOs, academia, civil society, the private sector, religious institutions and the media
(UN ECOSOC, 2003). As such, the importance of understanding the political context for achieving successful
research-based policy influencing cannot be underestimated.
• Encouraging lasting, participatory change: Participation and consultation with women and men are
regarded as essential for successful gender mainstreaming. This is not only about increasing the number of
women in the development agenda but also a matter of encouraging a transformative process to ensure that
both men and women can influence and participate in practice. This has been highlighted by initiatives in the
health sector, where involving men in women’s and children’s health care has led to significantly better
outcomes (WHO, 2007).

The first level of impact refers to ‘framing debates and agenda setting’. Examples include
mainstreaming children in public policy debates, sensitising authorities to their differential needs and
drawing attention to how children can be equally (if not more) affected by macro-level policies (e.g.
governance reforms, free trade agreements) than by obviously child-oriented sector-specific policies
such as education and health (Jones and Villar, 2008). Child-focused advocacy initiatives in Ethiopia

33
have spotlighted the detrimental effects that agriculture-led industrial development can have on child
labour, at the expense of school attendance (Woldehanna et al., 2008). Similar experiences in Peru
point to the need for social assessments of trade liberalisation policies, including intra-household and
intergenerational assessments for children living in rural areas (Escobal, 2007).

The second level refers to efforts to promote ‘discursive commitments from states and policy actors’.
While such commitments may not automatically translate into concrete impacts in children’s lives, they
often constitute an important source of leverage for promoting future policy and behavioural changes.
A good example of such commitments is the recent announcement by the transitional government in
Somalia that it will ratify the UNCRC.

The third level of policy impact encompasses ‘securing procedural changes from policy actors’. There is
suggestive evidence of efforts to work with provincial authorities in Vietnam being effective in opening
up dialogue with civil society, setting up partnerships between CSOs and government stakeholders in
PRSP consultations and incorporating children as a crosscutting issue in the nationwide policy process.

The fourth stage of policy impact, ‘affecting policy’, includes achieving budget increases or adopting
new legislation. The former is often more challenging, as it requires that child-focused ministries, which
often have weak budget planning and negotiation skills, effectively lobby ministries of finance and
economics for increased budget allocations.

The final stage includes the challenge of ‘changing the behaviour of target actors’, which is often the
most time-intensive type of activity, given that it requires tackling frequently deeply engrained
institutional practices and socio-cultural attitudes. A good example here is efforts to eradicate harmful
traditional practices such as genital mutilation/cutting: many countries in West and Central Africa have
passed legislation, for instance, but the practice remains widespread.

In sum, while knowledge translation initiatives have burgeoned over the past two decades in a variety
of sectors, in both North and South, they appear to have been more effective in shaping policy agendas
and securing discursive commitments from national and international decision makers than in
impacting policy or behavioural changes. As argued in Box 5, lessons from gender mainstreaming
initiatives suggest that, to effectively address the marginalisation and limited visibility of children and
knowledge about children’s rights within the international development community, efforts will need to
pay particular attention to the following: tackling barriers related to institutional culture dynamics
whereby child rights remain an ‘add-on’ rather than a central component of achieving better
development outcomes; framing debates so that they resonate with broader development discourses;
and encouraging more meaningful and strategic participation by children, young people and their
advocates in policy initiatives.

34
5. Conclusions
This paper has provided an overview of the evolution of knowledge generation on children’s rights and
efforts to ‘translate’ this knowledge into accessible policy- and practice-related messages. While
highlighting the considerable advancements made in our collective understanding of children,
childhoods and children’s rights over the past two decades and efforts to expand and deepen this
knowledge base as well as its uptake into policy and practice arenas, the paper also underscores a
number of important challenges. In order to strengthen the knowledge–policy–practice interface on
children’s rights, these will need to be tackled strategically and through coordination across sectors
and researcher, policymaker and practitioner communities.

First, in terms of knowledge generation, while knowledge about children is central to any policy change,
the power dynamics around knowledge cannot be denied. Positivist approaches aim at identifying
‘objective truths’ about the nature of childhood and the routes to child well-being (pursued by medical
science, for example), but our review of the literature highlights that the observer’s standpoint affects
what is seen at every level. The ideas people themselves generate about childhood are as important in
the views they hold as are ‘objective’ measures of the quality of life or research-based explanations of
social phenomena. There is thus a complex, multidimensional and dynamic process involved in the
construction of knowledge on child well-being, which involves the exercise of power, from the selection
of important questions for investigation to the methodology used, the people involved and the
selective use of available evidence. Different insights flow from the choices made and, in turn, often
have important policy implications. As professionals, scientific objectivity and rigorous method allow
us partially to overcome stereotypical observations and interpretation about childhoods; however, our
own professional training and culture lend bias and, as anthropological insights on reflexivity show,
our personal experience is undeniable in the way we take up and frame new information.

Knowledge about children is dependent on time and space, as well as particular disciplinary and
epistemological traditions and perspectives. In the pursuit of data, we must be aware of the genesis of
new knowledge. Clearly, empirical data employed across scientific and social scientific fields vary
hugely in terms of methodological enquiry, from anthropological understandings of children’s
experiences through to econometric impact assessments. Nevertheless, such data are increasingly
shared across disciplines. Incorporating historical perspectives into contemporary understandings of
childhood well-being, for instance, leads not only to more nuanced policy approaches but also to a
broader understanding of the underlying and hidden factors supporting policy choices. How
disciplines, societies and individuals interpret childhood is clearly hugely variable and presents both
considerable challenges as well as opportunities in monitoring child well-being. As this paper has
discussed, a burgeoning array of monitoring initiatives have been undertaken, but there are still
significant gaps that need to be addressed if we are to effectively promote an evidence-informed policy
culture on child well-being.

Understanding the complexities of knowledge generation is an important first step in mapping the
knowledge–policy interface on child well-being but equally important is an analysis of knowledge
translation dynamics. As we have emphasised, very little critical analysis has been undertaken in this
field, and accordingly this paper has provided a framework to think about opportunities and barriers for
direct and indirect knowledge uptake as well as an initial mapping of some key factors.

The framework highlights the importance of power relations and political contexts in shaping
knowledge translation opportunities, successes and failures. Here it is critical to understand the type
and quality of governance, the focus of nation-building projects, civil society–state relations in the
policy process as well as the relative influence of external actors, among other factors. Recognising that
political activity around childhood needs to be facilitated from a macro level to prevent ‘ghettoisation’
of children’s issues in only one or two social development sectors, our discussion has focused on

35
examples at the macro policy level, including the uptake of child well-being in PRSPs; the effect of the
current global economic crisis on children and social protection policy responses; the broader aid
environment and consideration of child well-being; and governance challenges in relation to the UNCRC
in fragile states.

Making more of the potential synergies among the range of actors involved in the knowledge-to-policy
process is also critical to address child rights. In this regard, there is increasing recognition of the vital
importance of knowledge management, i.e. developing a strategic approach to capture and share tacit
as well as codified forms of knowledge in order to promote accessibility of that knowledge among end-
users. However, while there have been important advances in this field, including CRIN, DevInfo, Eldis
and the IRC, knowledge management approaches in the field of child rights, especially in terms of
breadth of geographical and thematic coverage, are still in a relatively fledgling state. This is
particularly the case for university and international NGO knowledge generation efforts. Addressing
these weaknesses will require coordinated and concerted action among actors across a range of
sectors, institutions and contexts, if children are to become routinely integrated into key development
policy debates, whether on the global financial crisis or on efforts to address threats to human security.

Similarly, knowledge translation initiatives – encompassing the actors, ideas and processes involved
in transforming ideas and evidence related to child rights into policy- and practice-relevant concepts
and recommendations – have burgeoned over the past two decades in a variety of sectors in both
North and South, but appear to have been more effective in shaping policy agendas and securing
discursive commitments from national and international decision makers than in impacting policy or
behavioural changes. This said, stage theories on children’s physiological and psychological
development have held considerable sway over the design of social policy approaches and services in
many contexts, while rights-based frameworks have led to the introduction of critical social equity
measures, including birth registration campaigns and efforts to regulate harmful forms of child labour.
By contrast, more recent and nuanced understandings of childhood emerging from the sociology of
childhood school have had only limited policy purchase to date.

In short, in order to address the marginalisation and limited visibility of children and knowledge about
children’s rights within the international development community, particular attention will need to be
paid to: tackling barriers related to institutional culture dynamics, whereby child rights remain an ‘add-
on’ rather than a central component of achieving better development outcomes; framing debates so
that they resonate with broader development discourses; and encouraging more meaningful and
strategic participation in policy initiatives by children and young people. A more dynamic and proactive
knowledge–policy–practice interface on child well-being will also necessitate greater investment in
knowledge translation efforts that go beyond basic knowledge provision and focus on strategic
promotion of that knowledge to target audiences at multiple levels, from the international to the local.
This could include support, for instance, to knowledge hubs embedded within key government
ministries (along the lines of the WHO’s support to health policy research hubs in ministries of health
in select developing countries to streamline the channelling of new research knowledge to
policymakers but also to communicate demand for new knowledge to researcher and practitioner
communities), or fostering knowledge networks linked to legislative committees (such as those
established in Vietnam with the aim of strengthening the evidence base available to the legislative
committees on economic and social affairs). Critically, such initiatives need to focus as much on
improving knowledge production as on enhancing capacities of policy actors to effectively identify and
articulate their demand for knowledge on child well-being and children’s rights.

36
References
Adamson, P. (2008) ‘The Child Care Transition: A League Table of Early Childhood Education and Care in
Economically Advanced Countries’. Report Card 8. Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre: Florence.
Adolescent Development and Participation Unit (2009) ‘Youth Participation in Poverty Reduction Strategies and
National Development Plans. A Desk Study’. New York: UNICEF.
Ahmed, M. (2005) ‘Bridging Research and Policy’. Journal of International Development 17(6): 765-773.
Alanen, L. and B. Mayall (2001) Conceptualizing Child-Adult Relations. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Alston, P. (1987) ‘The Nature of International Human Rights Discourse: The Case of the “New” Human Rights’.
Conference on an Interdisciplinary Inquiry into the Content and Value of the So-Called ‘New Human Rights’.
Oxford, 29-31 May.
Alston, P. and J. Tobin (2005) ‘Laying the Foundations for Children’s Rights. An Independent Study of Some Key
Legal and Institutional Aspects of the Impact of the Convention on the Rights of the Child’. Florence: IRC.
American Anthropological Association (1999) ‘Declaration on Anthropology and Human Rights’. Adopted June
1999.
Beazley, H., S. Bessell, J. Ennew and R. Waterson (2009) ‘The Right to Be Properly Researched: Research with
Children in a Messy, Real World’. Children's Geographies 7(4): 365-378.
Becker, G.S. (1964) Human Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
Becker, G.S. (1981) A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Behrman, J.R. (2007) ‘Policy-Oriented Research Impact Assessment Case Study on the IFPRI and Mexican
PROGRESA Anti-Poverty and Human Resource Investment Conditional Cash Transfer Program’. Washington,
DC: IFPRI.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2006) ‘Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education. Measuring and Monitoring the
Well-Being of Young Children around the World’. Background Paper prepared for UNESCO (2007) Education
for All Global Monitoring Report 2007. Paris: UNESCO.
Bell, C. and H. Gersbach (2009) ‘Child Labour and the Education of a Society’. Macroeconomic Dynamics 13(2):
220-249.
Bolton, P. et al. (2007) ‘Interventions for Depression Symptoms among Adolescent Survivors of War and
Displacement in Northern Uganda: A Randomized Controlled Trial’. Journal of the American Medical
Association 298(5): 519-527.
Boyden, J. (2003) ‘Children under Fire: Challenging Assumptions about Children’s Resilience’. Children, Youth and
Environments 13(1).
Boyden, J. and D. Levison (2000) Children as Economic and Social Actors in the Development Process. Working
Paper 2000:1. Stockholm: Ministry for Foreign Affairs.
Bradshaw, J., P. Hoelscher and D. Richardson (2006) ‘Comparing Child Well-Being In OECD Countries: Concepts
and Methods’. Florence: IRC.
Buergenthal, T. (1997) ‘The Normative and Institutional Evolution of International Human Rights’. Human Rights
Quarterly 19(4): 703-723.
Cairo Conference (2009) ‘Child Poverty and Disparities: Public Policies for Social Justice’ Conference’. Cairo, 19-20
January.
Chiappori, P., L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott and R. Kanbur (1993) Unitary versus Collective Models of the Household.
Time to Shift the Burden of Proof? Policy Research Working Paper 1217. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Clay, E.J. and B.B. Schaffer (1984) Room for Manoeuvre; An Exploration of Public Policy in. Agricultural and Rural
Development. London: Heineman Educational Books.
Cohen, M. (2004) ‘Knowledge and the Gendered Curriculum: The Problematisation of Girls' Achievement’. History
and Policy (December).
Conceição, P. and N. Kim (2009) The Asymmetric Impact of Growth Fluctuation on Human Development: Evidence
from Correlates of Growth Decelerations and Accelerations. Working Paper. New York: UNDP/ODS.
Cook, H. (2003) ‘No Turning Back: Family Forms and Sexual Mores in Modern Britain’. History and Policy
(November).
Court, J. and J. Young (2006) ‘Bridging Research and Policy in International Development: An Analytical and
Practical Framework’. Development in Practice 16(1): 85-90.
Court, J., I. Hovland and J. Young (2005) Bridging Research and Policy in Development: Evidence and the Change
Process. London: ITDG Publishing.
Culpeper, R. (2008) ‘Research, Practitioners and the Public Good: Danger Signs’. 2008 ISA Conference. San
Francisco, 26 March.
Department for International Development (2004) ‘Evaluation of DFID Development Assistance: Gender Equality
and Women’s Empowerment. DFID’s Experience of Gender Mainstreaming: 1995-2004’. London: DFID.
37
Dessy, S. and S. Pallage (2005) ‘A Theory of the Worst Forms of Child Labour’. The Economic Journal 115(500): 68-
87.
Duflo E. (2003) ‘Grandmothers and Granddaughters: Old-Age Pension and Intra-Household Allocation in South
Africa’. Work Bank Economic Review 17(1): 1-25.
Engsted-Maquet, I. and A.C. Guio (2008) ‘Fighting Child Poverty in the European Union: How International
Benchmarking Can Contribute to Awareness Raising and Enhance Delivery at EU and National Level’.
Brussels: EC/IWEPS.
Escobal, J. (2007) ‘Trade Liberalisation and Children. Understanding and Coping with Children’s Vulnerabilities’.
2002 Focus brief on the World’s Poor and Hungry People. Washington, DC: IFPRI.
Evans, T. (2006) ‘Is It Futile to Try to Get Non-Resident Fathers to Maintain Their Children?’ History and Policy
(October).
Eyben, R. and S. Ladbury (2006) ‘Implications for Aid Practice: Taking a Citizen's Perspective’. Citizenship DRC
Synthesis Brief.
Ferguson, J., K. Mchombu and S. Cummings (2008) ‘Meta-Review and Scoping Study of the Management of
Knowledge for Development’. IKM Emergent Paper 1.
Fernando, J. (2001) ‘Children's Rights: Beyond the Impasse’. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and
Social Science 575(1): 8-24.
Freeman, F., M. Barahona, A. Bonde, S. Forti, B. Mikkelsen and G. Salinas (2002) ‘Country Report Nicaragua’.
Sida’s Support for the Promotion of Gender Equality in Partner Countries. Stockholm: Sida.
Friedman, J. and N. Schady (2009) How Many More Infants are Likely to Die in Africa as a Result of the Global
Financial Crisis? Policy Research Working Paper 5023. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hafner-Burton, E. and K. Tsutsui (2005) ‘Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises’.
American Journal of Sociology 110(5): 1373-1411.
Harper, C. and N. Jones (2008) ‘Why Are Children’s Rights Invisible?’ Opinion. London: ODI.
Harper, C. and N. Jones (2009a) ‘Raising the Game: Mainstreaming Children’s Rights’. London: ODI.
Harper, C. and N. Jones (2009b) ‘Child Rights and Aid: Mutually Exclusive?’ London: ODI.
Harper, C. and Jones, N. (2009c) ‘Child Rights and Aid: Always Awkward Bed Fellows? Assessing the Visibility of
Children’s Rights in Donor Action’. London: ODI.
Harper, C., R. Marcus and K. Moore (2003) ‘Enduring Poverty and the Conditions of Childhood: Life Course and
Intergenerational Poverty Transmissions’. World Development 31(3): 535-555.
Harper, C., N. Jones and A. McKay (2009a) ‘Including Children in Policy Responses to Economic Crises: Lessons
from the Past and Policies for a Sustainable Future’. ODI and UNICEF Synthesis Conference Paper.
Harper, C., N. Jones, J. Espey, N. Patrick, P. Pereznieto and D. Walker (2009b) EC Toolkit on Child Rights: Child
Rights in Poverty Reduction Strategy Processes: Desk Review. New York: UNICEF.
Hathaway, O. (2002) ‘Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?’ Yale Law Journal 111(8): 1935-2042.
Hashim I. (2005) ‘Exploring the Linkages between Children's Independent Migration and Education: Evidence
from Ghana’. Brighton: Sussex Centre for Migration Research.
Hearn S. and White, N. (2009) ‘Communities of Practice: Linking Knowledge, Policy and Practice’. Background
Paper. London: ODI.
Heidel, K. (2005) ‘Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: Children First! A Case Study on PRSP Processes in Ethiopia,
Kenya and Zambia from a Child Rights Perspective’. Duisburg: KNH.
Holmes, R. and T. Braunholtz-Speight (2009) ‘Strengthening Social Protection For Children: West and Central
Africa’. Regional Thematic Report for UNICEF Regional Office for West and Central Africa.
Hossain, N. et al. (2009) ‘Accounts of Crisis: Poor People’s Experiences of the Food, Fuel and Financial Crises in
Five Countries’. Report on a pilot study in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Jamaica, Kenya and Zambia, January-
March 2009. Brighton: IDS.
Hovland, I. (2003) Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning: An International Development
Perspective. An Annotated Bibliography. Working Paper 224. London: ODI.
Jacquemin, M. (2006) ‘Can the Language of Rights Get Hold of the Complex Realities of Child Domestic Work? The
Case of Young Domestic Workers in Abidjan, Ivory Coast’. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research
13(3): 389-406.
James, A. and A. James (1999) ‘Pump up the Volume. Listening to Children in Separation and Divorce’. Childhood:
A Global Journal of Child Research 6(2): 189-206.
James, A. and A. Prout (1990) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the
Sociological Study of Childhood. London: The Falmer Press.
Jefferess, D. (2002) ‘Neither Seen Nor Heard: The Idea of the “Child” as Impediment to the Rights of Children’.
Topia: A Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies 7 (Spring): 75-97.
Jones, N. (2008) ‘Civil Society Organisations and Legislators. Policy Engagement in East and Southern Africa’. In
Capacity.org. Research, Policy and Practice 35 (December).
38
Jones, N. (2009) ‘Child Protection and Social Protection Systems in West and Central Africa’. Regional Thematic
Report for UNICEF Regional Office for West and Central Africa.
Jones, N. and H. Marsden (2009) ‘Assessing the Impacts of and Policy Responses to the 1997-1998 Asian
Financial Crisis through a Child Rights Lens’. Report commissioned by UNICEF.
Jones, N. and J. Pomares (forthcoming) ‘Evidence-Based Policy Processes: A Systematic Review of the Knowledge–
Policy Interface across Policy Areas’. Working Paper. London: ODI.
Jones N. and A. Sumner (2007) Does Mixed Methods Research Matter to Understanding Childhood Well-Being?
Working Paper 39. Bath: University of Bath.
Jones, N. and A. Sumner (2009) ‘How, When and Why does Child Research Influence Policy (or Not?)’ Conference
on Child Poverty and Disparities: Public Policies for Social Justice. Cairo, 19-20 January.
Jones, N. and E. Villar (2008) Situating Children in International Development Policy: Challenges Involved in
Successful Evidence-Informed Policy Influencing. Bristol: Policy Press, University of Bristol.
Jones, N. and J. Young (2007) ‘Setting the Scene: Situating DFID’s Research Funding Policy and Practice in an
International Comparative Perspective’. Scoping Study commissioned by DFID Central Research
Department.
Jones, N., A. Datta and H. Jones (2009a) ‘Knowledge, Policy and Power. Six Dimensions of the Knowledge–
Development Policy Interface’. London: ODI.
Jones, N., H. Jones, S. Steer and A. Datta (2009b) Improving Impact Evaluation Production and Use. Working Paper
300. London: ODI.
Kabeer, N. (2003) ‘Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Poverty Eradication and the MDGs’. London: Commonwealth
Secretariat.
Keck, M. and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
Keller, B., B. Mikkelsen and T. Freeman, S. Possing, K. Schoeman and R.-P. Pethu Serote (2002) ‘Country Report
South Africa’. Sida’s Support for the Promotion of Gender Equality in Partner Countries. Stockholm: Sida.
Khan, A. (2001) Managing Flows of Information in the Child Rights Community. London: CRIN.
Lansdown, G. (2005) ‘The Evolving Capacities of the Child’. Insight 05/18. Florence: IRC.
Laws, S., C. Harper and R. Marcus (2003) Research for Development, A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
Levison, D. (2000) ‘Children as Economic Agents’. Feminist Economics 6(1): 125-134.
Lindquist, E.A. (2001) Discerning Policy Influence: Framework for a Strategic Evaluation of IDRC-Supported
Research. Ottawa: IDRC.
Macdonald, C.M. (2008) ‘The Fragile State of Evidence: The Role of Evidence in the Policy Processes of Fragile
States and Donor Engagement Strategies with Fragile States’. Master’s Thesis, Department of War Studies,
Kings College, London.
Marcus, R. (2009) ‘Transition to a Market Economy and Children’s Rights: Kyrgyzstan in Regional perspective’.
London: ODI.
Massesa, J.W. (2004) ‘Children and Poverty: What Children and Young People are Saying about Poverty in
Tanzania: An Overview Report on their Issues in Tanzania’. Tanzania: TMC.
Mayall, B. (2000) ‘The Sociology of Childhood in Relation to Children’s Rights’, The International Journal of
Children’s Rights 8(3): 243-259.
Mendizabal, E. (2006) Building Effective Research Policy Networks: Linking Function and Form. Working Paper
276. London: ODI.
Mikkelsen, B., T. Freeman, M. Huda, S. Leowinatha and J. Rahman (2002) ‘Country Report Bangladesh’. Sida’s
Support for the Promotion of Gender Equality in Partner Countries. Stockholm: Sida.
Mincer, J. (1974) Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
Minujin, A., E. Delamonica, A. Davidziuk and E.D. Gonzalez (2006) ‘The Definition of Child Poverty: A Discussion of
Concepts and Measurements’. Environment and Urbanization 18(2): 481-500.
Morrow, V. (2006) ‘Understanding Gender Differences in Context: Implications for Young Children’s Everyday
Lives’. Children and Society 20(2): 92-104.
Morrow, V. and P. Connolly (2006) ‘Editorial’. Children and Society 20(2): 87-91.
Mosley, H. and L. Chen (1984) ‘An Analytical Framework for the Study of Child Survival in Developing Countries’.
Population and Development Review 10(Suppl.): 25-45.
Muralidharan, K. and V. Sundararaman (2008) Teacher Performance Pay: Experimental Evidence from India.
Working Paper. Nashville: National Center on Performance Incentives.
Nash, R., A. Hudson and C. Luttrell (2006) ‘Mapping Political Context. A Toolkit for Civil Society Organisations’.
London: ODI.
National Centre for Children in Poverty (2000) ‘Child Poverty in the States: Levels and Trends from 1979 to 1998’.
Childhood Poverty Research Brief 2. New York: NCCP.
National Children’s Office (2005) ‘The Development of a National Set of Child Well-Being Indicators’. Dublin: NCO.

39
Newell, P. and D. Tussie (2006) Civil Society Participation in Trade Policy-making in Latin America: Lessons and
Reflections. Working Paper 267. Brighton: IDS.
Nguyen, T., M.H. Nguyen and T.L. Pham (forthcoming) ‘Fostering the Right to Participation: Children’s Involvement
in Vietnam’s Poverty Reduction Policy Process’. Children’s Geographies.
Nutt, T. (2006) ‘The Child Support Agency and the Old Poor Law’. History and Policy (October).
O’Malley, K. (2004) ‘Children and Young People Participating in PRSP Processes: Lessons from Save the
Children’s Experience’. London: Save the Children.
Peck, S. (1987) The Different Drum: Community Making and Peace. New York: Simon & Shuster.
Pham, T.L. and N. Jones (2005) The Ethics of Research Reciprocity: Making Children's Voices Heard in Poverty
Reduction Policy-Making in Vietnam. Young Lives Working Paper 15. London: Save the Children UK.
Pratham (2007) ‘MDG to the People: The PAHELI Experience’. Human Development Toolkit and Report Cards.
Mumbai: Prathan.
Prout, A. (2004) The Future of Childhood. Towards the Interdisciplinary Study of Children. Abingdon:
RoutledgeFalmer.
Rahman, M., R. Khanam and N. Absar (1999) ‘Child Labor in Bangladesh: A Critical Appraisal of Harkin's Bill and
the MOU-Type Schooling Program’. Journal of Economic Issues 33(4): 985-1003.
Ramalingam, B. (2005) ‘The Knowledge and Learning Toolkit’. London: ODI.
Ranjan, P. (1999) ‘An Economic Analysis of Child Labor’. Economics Letters 64(1): 99-105.
Ravallion, M. and Q. Wodon (2000) ‘Does Child Labour Displace Schooling? Evidence on Behavioural Responses
to an Enrollment Subsidy’. The Economic Journal 110(462): C158-C175.
Ray, R. (2000) ‘Child Labors, Child Schooling, and Their Interaction with Adult Labor: Empirical Evidence for Peru
and Pakistan’. World Bank Economic Review 14(2): 347-367.
Reynolds, S. (2008) Complexities of Colombian Families: Intergenerational Intrahousehold Bargaining. Working
Paper. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rigby, M. and L. Kohler (2002) ‘Child Health Indicators of Life and Development (CHILD)’. Report to the EC.
Rossel-Cambier, K., T. Olsen and N. Pourzand (2007) ‘Investing in Knowledge for Evidence-Based Social Policies
for Children: Two Case Studies of Knowledge Dissemination Initiatives in the Eastern Caribbean’.
Knowledge Management for Development Journal 3(2-3): 74-84.
Saunders, B. and C. Goddard (2001) ‘The Textual Abuse of Childhood in the English-Speaking World: The
Contribution of Language to the Denial of Children’s Rights’. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research
8(4): 443-462.
Schultz, T. (1971) Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and of Research. New York: Free Press.
Scoones, I., M. Leach and K. Cockburn (2006) ‘Science and Citizens: Global and Local Voices’. Policy Briefing.
Brighton: IDS.
Sheldon, N. (2009) ‘Tackling Truancy: Why Have the Millions Invested Not Paid Off?’ History and Policy (February).
Stein, R. and D. Jessop (1982) ‘A Non Categorical Approach to Chronic Childhood Illness’. Public Health Reports
97(4): 354-362.
Stone, D. (2004) ‘Transfer Agents and Global Networks in the “Transnationalisation” of Policy’. Journal of
European Public Policy 11(3): 545-566.
Stone, D. (2008) Transnational Philanthropy, Policy Transfer Networks and the Open Society Institute. Working
Paper 41/08. Coventry: GARNET.
Szreter, S. (2007) ‘The Right of Registration: Development, Identity Registration and Social Security’. World
Development 35(1): 67-86.
Talisayon, S. (2009) ‘Monitoring and Evaluation in Knowledge Management for Development’. IKM Emergent
Paper 3.
Thane, P. (2002) ‘The Work-Life Balance in an Ageing Society’. History and Policy (May).
Theis, J. (1996) ‘Children and Participatory Appraisals: Experiences from Vietnam’. PLA Notes 25: 70-72.
Thomas, N. (2009) Children, Politics and Communication. Participation at the Margins. Bristol: Policy Press,
University of Bristol.
UN (2006a) ‘Report of the Independent Expert for the United Nations Study on Violence against Children’.
Secretary-General A/61/299.
UN (2006b) ‘Study on Violence against Children’. Independent Expert for the Secretary-General. New York and
Geneva: UN.
UN Children’s Fund (2005a) Childhood under Threat. The State of the World’s Children. New York: UNICEF.
UN Children’s Fund (2005b) ‘Evaluation of the IRC’. Florence: IRC.
UN Children’s Fund (2005c) ‘The UNICEF Medium-Term Strategic Plan, 2006-2009. Investing in Children: The
UNICEF Contribution to Poverty Reduction and the Millennium Summit Agenda’. Florence: IRC.
UN Children’s Fund (2005d) ‘Progress Report and Proposed Activities for 2006-2008’. New York: UNICEF.

40
UN Children’s Fund (2007) ‘Report Card 7. An Overview of Child Well-Being in Rich Countries. A Comprehensive
Assessment of the Lives and Well-Being of Children and Adolescents in the Economically Advanced
Nations’. Florence: IRC.
UN Children’s Fund (2008) ‘Releasing Declining Numbers for Child Mortality, UNICEF Calls for Increased Efforts to
Save Children’s Lives’. Press Release.
UN Children’s Fund (2009a) ‘Progress and Achievements against the Medium-Term Strategic Plan’. Annual Report
of the Executive Director, Executive Board Annual Session, 8-10 June.
UN Children’s Fund (2009b) ‘Innocenti Social Monitor 2009. Child Well-Being at a Crossroads: Evolving
Challenges in CEE and the CIS’. Florence: IRC.
UN Development Program (2006) ‘Evaluations of Gender Mainstreaming in UNDP’. Evaluation Office. New York:
UNDP.
UN Economic and Social Council (2003) Putting Gender Mainstreaming into Practice. New York: UN ECOSOC.
Vasquez, E. (2004) Los Niños Primero? Cuanto Invirtio el Estado Peruano en Niños, Niñas y Adolecentes de 2001 a
2003. Santiago: Save the Children Sweden and Universidad del Pacifico.
Wells, K. (2009) Childhood in a Global Perspective. London: Polity Press.
Williams, E. (2004) ‘Children's Participation and Policy Change in South Asia’. Report 6. London: CHIP.
Wills, A. (2007) ‘Historical Myth-Making in Juvenile Justice Policy’. History and Policy (July).
White, S. (2002) ‘Being, Becoming and Relationship. Conceptual Challenges of a Child Rights Approach in
Development’. Journal of International Development 14(8): 1095-1104.s
Woldehanna, T., N. Jones and B. Tefera (2008) ‘The Invisibility of Children’s Paid and Unpaid Work: Implications
for Ethiopia’s National Poverty Reduction Policy’. Childhood 15(2): 177-201.
Wood, D. (1988) How Children Think and Learn: The Social Contexts of Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA
and Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
World Health Organization (2007) Engaging Men and Boys in Changing Gender-Based Inequity in Health: Evidence
from Programme Interventions. Geneva: WHO.
Young. J. (2008) ‘Impact of Research on Policy and Practice. Working with Complexity.’ Capacity.org 2008.
Research, Policy and Practice 35 (December).

41
Appendix 1: Towards the development of a high-quality actionable
outcome conference document
What insights can be gained from an analysis of the outcome documents from relevant
international conferences in terms of ensuring a high quality, easily accessible outcome
document?
The general success of a conference is a function of a number of variables. While some of these are not
easily measurable, such as the achievement of its objectives and the quality of its participation, the
fact that steps and actions have taken place or not as a follow-up to the conference is less contestable.
If the existence of follow up actions represents a good proxy for the success of a conference, the
documents produced by the conference, which realistically include the directions for future action,
become a key aspect worth investing in and analyzing.

The role played by documents in the uptake of key messages conveyed in a conference becomes
especially important when the conference aims at developing a knowledge base and a research agenda
for the realization of child rights (as with the case of the upcoming conference “Children’s Rights at a
Cross-Roads”). But the challenges are considerable considering the widely recognized complexities of
the knowledge-policy interface. Given the non-linear and highly context-specific nature of the policy
process, knowledge translation aiming at evidence-informed policy and practice depends on a variety
of different factors and requires a strategic approach (Jones et al., 2009). Within this context, framing
and communicating key messages from a conference emerges as an important element of the overall
efficacy of the event (Mendizabal and Young, 2009).

When looking at the outputs produced by international conferences on child-related issues there
seems to be a confusing range of different documents, from general conference reports (e.g. 2009
Report on the International Girl Child; 2005 Report on the East Asia and Pacific Regional Consultation
on Violence Against Children; 2005 Report on the Europe and Central Asia Regional Consultation on
Violence Against Children), to mere “declarations” (2005 Bethlehem Declaration), to papers and
presentations presented by participants on the occasion of the conference (as for the four UNICEF-GPIA
conferences), and a relatively limited number of ‘outcome documents’ defined as such. Indeed, only
approximately half of the conferences analyzed (see table in appendix) have produced documents that
are defined as ‘outcomes’ (i.e. the “Rio Outcome Document” (2008), the outcome document from the
conference on “Children, torture and other forms of violence” (2001) and the outcome documents of
the “International Conference on War-affected Children” (2000)).

Outcome documents can be stand-alone papers (as the Rio Declaration) or can alternatively be
included as a section, annex or appendix of a more general conference summary report (as the Report
on the International Girl Child Conference (The Hague, March 2009) or the outcome document of the
2000 International Conference on War-affected Children in Canada). They can consist in relatively short
documents (18 pages for the Rio Declaration) or much longer papers (56 pages for the outcome
document from the 2001 conference on Children, torture and other forms of violence in Finland). They
can be available as a html page on the internet and downloadable as a pdf document only when
searching for the specific document on the web (Yokohama Global Commitment) or they can
alternatively be easily accessible and downloadable in word or pdf format from the website of the
conference as well as by searching for the specific document on the web (Rio Declaration). The fact that
the outputs of a conference are only accessible in the form of a html page evidently hampers the
readability of the document, the possibility of retrieving the information easily in the future and thus
the sustainability of its messages. Furthermore, the lack of a website specifically designed for the
conference as a platform for exchanging information, opinions and updates following the event, seems
to further worsen the sustainability of the conference messages (within the sample of child-related
conferences analyzed, 4 have a related website).

It is worth pointing out that merely defining a document as an ‘outcome’ seems no guarantee for the
take up of its messages. In our sample of child-related conferences analyzed, only 3 conferences
42
present evidence that follow up actions have indeed taken place: the Yokohama Global Commitment
found follow up in the Third World Congress against the Sexual Exploitation of Children and
Adolescents (Rio de Janeiro 2008), the Rio Declaration was followed up (partly) by a conference on
related issues that took place in Strasbourg (“Council of Europe Platform on Children’s Rights”,
Launching Conference June 2009) and specific actions have followed the International Girl Child
Conference that recently took place in the Hague (specifically, the appointment of a UN Special
Representative on Violence against Children, monitoring initiatives of participants’ efforts in
implementing the conference and a follow-up conference in November 2009). It is interesting to note
how two of these conferences presenting follow up actions are linked to one another, suggesting the
existence of positive returns to follow ups, with the occurrence of one increasing the likelihood of the
next. Although the objective of the Strasbourg conference was to agree on a strategic vision to prevent
and address violence against children in Europe - and was not focused exclusively on the Rio follow up
- it did encompass efforts specifically aimed at creating a more informed environment for the
implementation of the Rio Outcome Document. Along these lines, it suggested a number of possible
follow-up actions for a “European Agenda for Action”, though these have not been formalized into a
conference outcome document, nor do they consist in a set of clear indications for the Council of
Europe.

Building on the sample of documents analyzed, the following key features have been identified as a
possible guideline for the development of future outcome documents:

1. Definition: The documents are clearly defined as ‘outcomes’ of the conference

2. Context: They can be downloaded as pdf documents from the conference website designed ad-hoc

3. Type: They consist in independent, stand-alone papers and are not only part or sections of general
conference reports

4. Title: They have a name that distinguishes them and is easily recallable (e.g. “The Rio Declaration”,
“The Yokohama Global Commitment”, “The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action”)

5. Length: They are relatively short documents with a limited number of pages (not over 20 pages)

6. Form: They convey the message of the conference in the form of participants’ intentions (i.e. “we”)
and in numbered and/or bullet points divided in a set of sub-sections

In addition to these five variables, a sixth aspect - the structure of the document - is worth considering.
While most conference papers present a set of recommendations and a call for action to governments
and other actors, outcome documents in particular stand out in the sense that they present a more
structured arrangement. Drawing from the sample of papers analyzed, the following can be suggested
as a tentative plan for the outline of an effective outcome document:

a) Preamble or a presentation of the conference issues including the number and the characteristics
of participants and a general statement of its objectives (e.g. “We, participants at… representing
governments, inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations… have gathered today to…”)
b) Review of progress or an assessment of the major developments/achievements since the previous
related conference(s) (e.g. “We welcome the progress achieved..” in numbered/bullet points).
These are usually not classified into specific achievements but consist in a general list of items.
They can include ‘local’ achievements such as small-scale regional consultations and seminars that
have lead to the conference or the international-level events such as the ratification of specific
international instruments, the adoption of legislative measures, the development of national plans
and multilateral agreements, or ideally improved child-related indicators.

c) Review of challenges or a presentation of the scope of the issue including reference to existing
challenges and concerns (e.g. “We note particular challenges and concerns…” in numbered/bullet

43
 points). Again, the classification of challenges into sub-sections does not seem necessary at this
point since the objective of sections b) and c) should realistically be presenting the broad picture of
the issue at stake. The challenges presented in the Rio Declaration, for instance, are not
categorized into topics and they consist of very general observations. The Declaration refers to
broad issues such as the “lack of adequate resources” hampering law enforcement, “insufficient
focus on measures to eliminate demand for sex with children”, inconsistent incorporation of
children’s views in national legislation or “lack of reliable data” and to vague remedies such as “a
more coherent framework for effective actions” or the need for “all feasible measures” to assure
“all appropriate assistance to child victims”. While the qualification of these issues - for instance
the concepts of ‘appropriateness’ or ‘sufficiency’ - remains an open matter, such generality is
somewhat compensated by the following sections of the document, where actions are indeed
organized into major themes and are described in more detail

d) Declaration/Commitment or participants’ promises clearly spelt out (e.g. “We will be guided…We
recognize…We welcome…We will support…We will strengthen…We encourage” in numbered or
bullet points). This section should consist of a “manifesto” of the conference. It should include a
formal re-affirmation of commitments of previous relevant international conferences and should go
hand in hand with the following section (e) with regard to the extent to which it highlights
participants’ determination to ensure successful implementation of the recommended action
points. The Beijing Declaration, for instance, explicitly refers to the 1985 Nairobi conference and its
forward-looking strategies. Similarly, the Rio Declaration makes explicit reference to the recognition
and the endorsement of international frameworks such as the MDGs, the recommendations of the
UN study against Children, the ILO’s Global Action Plan and the recommendations of the
Adolescent Declaration to End Sexual Exploitation. While this section can include very general
statements (e.g. “we are determined to promote women’s economic independence” – Beijing
Declaration), even at the expense of appearing over-ambitious (e.g. “eradicate all customary and
traditional practices that constitute violence against children” – Tampere Declaration), the
inclusion of specific recommendations at this stage of the document outline can turn out to be
redundant, given the specificity of the following section. For instance, the Tampere Declaration's
(2001) specific suggestion to appoint a Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Children in this part
of the document creates confusion to the reader. Jones and Villar’s 2008 (drawing on Keck and
Sikkink’s 1998 work on transnational activism) categorisation of the possible impacts of evidence-
based policy provides a useful framework for understanding which types of recommendations are
more suitable for this section. Recommendations that can be pinned down to “framing debates” or
“changing the behaviour of key actors” seem appropriate here, leaving more specific ones to the
following section on calls for action (see table 1).

e) Call for action: this is arguably the most important part of an outcome document as it outlines a
number of action points that the participants of the conference direct to State parties and other
relevant partners such as the UN, civil society and the media, often grouped per specific topic or
per geographical area (e.g. “We call upon States and…to…”). Our review of a sample of child- and
gender-related conferences highlights the presence of a wide range of recommendations. Although
this section is often used to present recommendations that are still relatively general in nature (as
in the previous section), such as acknowledging the role of education in preventing domestic
violence (International Girl Child Conference 2009), conducting educational and awareness raising
campaigns to improve the understanding of an exploitative use of the internet (Rio Declaration
2008) or eliminating trafficking in women (Beijing +5), the call for action should reflect the central
steps of Jones and Villar’s classification (see table 1) and indeed a large portion of action points
across conference outcomes are classified within these three specific categories. “Encouraging
discursive commitments from states and relevant policy actors” includes involving religious leaders
in honour-related violations (International Girl Child Conference 2009) or strengthening political
commitment to close the gender gap in primary and secondary education (Beijing+5). “Securing
procedural changes at the international and domestic level” encompasses encouraging community
involvement to stop the practice of early marriage (International Girl Child Conference 2009),
44
 strengthening international cooperation through arrangements for the prevention, detection and
prosecution of sexual abuse against children (Rio Declaration 2008) or increasing the participation
of women in conflict resolution at decision making levels (BPfA 1995). Examples of “affecting
policy” include increasing the number of specialists on domestic violence within governments
(IGCC 2009), criminalizing the production, distribution and possession of child pornography (Rio
Declaration 2008) or adapting environmental and agricultural policies to incorporate a gender
perspective (BPfA 1995) (see table 1 for further examples).

While the lack of specification as to who the action should be undertaken by might not always be
critical (as in cases in which the type of action is limited to a specific context and the actors
involved are thus easily identifiable e.g. recommendations vis-à-vis legislative measures), in other
cases a higher degree of definition as to who should realistically be included in accomplishing the
action could be important in facilitating actual implementation. Moreover, the lack of a sense of
urgency expressed in most recommendations raises the question as to whether the inclusion of
concrete deadlines could enhance the likelihood of their take up.

f) Follow up or practical steps for promoting effective implementation of the call for action. Despite
the recognition of the importance of monitoring and evaluating progress across outcome
documents, there is a general dearth of suggestions in this regard. The Rio Declaration, for
instance, identifies a very limited set of qualitative actions encompassing (1) general biennial
reporting on the measures taken at the national level for the implementation of the declaration (2)
support to human rights bodies at the international level so as to maintain awareness about the
Declaration and (3) call upon the private sector to join the UN Global Compact and communicate its
progress in the field. Similarly, the International Conference on the Girl Child only scheduled a
follow-up event to the conference in November 2009. The Beijing Platform for Action (BPfA) was
relatively more focused on follow up efforts, identifying a number of institutional and financial
arrangements (at the national, regional and international level) for securing the conditions that
would be necessary for implementing the objectives of the document. The former include a range of
actions such as promoting public awareness of the document through the mass media and public
education or developing governmental plans of action and the latter include allocating grants and
loans of international financial institutions to programmes specifically aimed at implementing the
BPfA. However, there is virtually no reference to measurable nor time-bound indicators, nor a
statement about the extent to which (or the process through which) the resources to ensure
implementation and monitoring and evaluation will be secured.

While further suggestions as to the possible ways for moving from mere recommendations to
tangible achievements would be useful (thus avoiding that a conference remains a mere ‘talk-
shop’), the lack of specific and quantitative indicators offered by conference outcomes documents
should not over-concern. Indeed, it has been argued that the greater focus on outcomes produced
by the series of international conferences that have taken place over the last decade has lead to an
excessive demand for indicators which often cannot be satisfied by national statistical systems in
the short term (Schweinfest 2001). Rather than risking that such pressure for information raises
issues of data quality and inconsistencies, it seems important to consider whether the use of
indicators is realistic at all, and eventually, agree on a limited number of indicators which are (i)
technically sound (ii) understandable (iii) relevant and (iv) cost-effective ("TURC test") (DeVries
2000). This is particularly relevant in the context of child-related conferences given the existing
challenges that exist in collecting and analysing child-sensitive data worldwide.

45
 Examples of recommendations from conference outcome documents (classified according to Jones and Villar’s 2008 framework)
(1) Framing debates/agenda
setting
(General Recommendations
Suitable for section d)
Child-related conferences
International Girl Scheduling of a follow-up event for
Child Conference (9- presenting the overall results of the
10 March 2009, The conference
Hague, The
Netherlands)
CHILD ABUSE: urge preventing and
combating child abuse
PARENTING: Make parenting a
mainstream issue
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE:
acknowledging role of education in
prevention
EARLY MARRIAGE: recommend
abandonment of practice
Nature of recommendations
(2) Encouraging discursive
commitments from states and
policy actors
(Less General recommendations
suitable for section e)
Invite the Special Representative on
VAC to address girls’ societal
position asap; emphasize child
participation in preventing and
addressing violence against girls
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: government
exchange of info and experiences
HONOUR-RELATED VIOLENCE:
involve religious leaders in
violations
SON PREFERENCE: encourage new
interpretations of laws for
redefining the concept of the family
(3) Securing procedural changes
at the international and domestic
level
(Specific Recommendations
suitable for section e)
The development of community-
based approaches to solve
problems; child help lines; inter-
agency cooperation; multi-
stakeholder partnerships in
combating violence; maintaining
website conference for info sharing
CHILD ABUSE: government
monitoring through specific targets
and indicators; equip communities
to solve the problem
PARENTING: Set up an international
rating system to compare
successful policies in different
countries; extend UN database on
VAW with info on VAC
GIRLS AND INTERNET: support
research on key protective factors
and on the involvement of children;
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: invest in
parental participation
FGM: facilitate bridges between
communities (of origin and
diaspora); collect disaggregated
and reliable data
(4) Affecting policy (5) Changing the
behaviour of key actors
(Less General recommendations (General
suitable for section e ) Recommendations
suitable for section d)
Appointment of the Special
Representative on VAC
GIRLS AND INTERNET: removal of
abusive websites from internet
service providers
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: increase
number of specialists within
government
EARLY MARRIAGE: promote
passage and implementation of
legislation (i.e. ensuring consent,
registration at birth, age of
marriage, criminalizing issue)
HONOUR-RELATED VIOLENCE:
abolish legal provisions treating
human rights violations not strictly
SON PREFERENCE: amend laws
that discriminate against girls;
make the education system more
gender-sensitive

World Congress III Conduct educational and
against the Sexual awareness raising campaigns to
Exploitation of improve understanding of
Children and exploitative use of the internet
Adolescents (25-28
November 2008, Rio Encourage the involvement of the
de Janeiro) private sector in preventing sexual
exploitation of children through
corporate social responsibility
initiatives
Call upon IFIs to review PRSs with a
view to counteract negative effects
on children and their families;
Human Rights Council to ensure
that Universal Periodic Review
process includes examination of
state’s obligations towards children
EARLY MARRIAGE: encourage
community involvement to stop
practice
HONOUR-RELATED VIOLENCE:
systematic collection of
disaggregated data at national and
community levels
SON PREFERENCE: encourage
interaction among actors for
equality advocacy; encourage
reconceptualisation of accepted
norms of femininity (through film
making, theatre etc.)
Mobilize communities to engage
them in dialogue and in planning
and monitoring strategies
Strengthen international
cooperation through arrangements
for the prevention, detection and
prosecution of offenders
Continue work towards ratification
of international and regional
instruments
Criminalize the production,
distribution and possession of
child pornography
Encourage adoption of
professional codes of conduct for
the protection of children from
sexual exploitation in tourism
Take legislative measures to
ensure appointment of a guardian
for every unaccompanied child
and registration system of all
trafficked children
Establish special gender
sensitive/child desks units within
police forces
Develop National action plans on
sexual exploitation of children
Establish by 2013 children’s
ombudspersons/focal points in
children’s rights institutions
2nd World Congress Reiterate the importance of Collect gender-disaggregated data; Encourage early ratification of
against commercial implementing the UNCRC networking among key actors to relevant international instruments;
sexual exploitation combat commercial exploitation commit to developing national
of children agendas, designate focal points;
(Yokohama criminalize commercial
December 2001) exploitation of children in all forms

Gender conferences

Beijing Platform for Promote and protect the rights of Increase the participation of women Review, adopt and maintain macro Provide women with
Action (examples of the girl child and increase in conflict resolution at decision policies and development access to savings and
strategic objectives awareness of her needs and making levels strategies that address the needs credit mechanisms and
illustrated here, not potential and efforts of women in poverty institutions
the actions to be
taken) Allocate sufficient resources for Eradicate illiteracy among
and monitor the implementation of women
educational reforms
Increase women’s access
to appropriate, affordable
and quality healthcare

Eliminate trafficking in
women

Beijing+5 (examples Strengthen political commitment to Use of targets including quotas to Adapt environmental and
of actions and close the gender gap in primary and promote gender balance in all areas agricultural policies to incorporate
initiatives) secondary education of public life a gender perspective

Encourage collaboration among Ensure reduction of maternal

governments, NGOs, community mortality is a health sector priority
leaders etc. for the protection of all
human rights of women and girls Adopt, review and revise health
legislation
Sample of international conference documents analysed
A. Conference B. Available Document(s)
4th World Conference on Beijing Declaration and
Women (Beijing 1995) Platform for Action (BPfA)
Beijing + 5 (November Further actions and
2000) initiatives to implement the
Beijing Declaration and
Platform for Action
International Girl Child Report on the International
Conference (9-10 March Girl Child Conference
2009, The Hague, The
Netherlands)
World Congress III against Rio Outcome Document
the Sexual Exploitation of (also called The Rio
Children and Adolescents Declaration and Call for
(25-28 November 2008, Action to prevent and stop
Rio de Janeiro) sexual exploitation of
children and adolescents) –
18pgs
C. Structure/Content of document D. Evidence of follow up to
document
• Beijing Declaration (commitment to implement the BPfA) Beijing + 5, Beijing + 10
• Platform for Action:
a. Mission Statement
b. Global framework (contextualizes Beijing in relation to other previous conferences and presents
issue and major happenings)
c. 12 Critical areas of concern
d. Strategic objectives and actions to be taken by specific actors (governments, IFIs, NGOs)
e. Institutional arrangements (national, regional, international level)
f. Financial arrangements (national, regional, international level)
• Introduction
• Achievements and obstacles in implementing the 12 areas of concern
• Current challenges affecting full implementation of the BD and BPfA
• Actions and initiatives to overcome obstacles and achieve full implementation (by governments,
by private sector, NGOs, civil society, by UN and international organisations etc.)
• Recommendations of participants/Outcomes of the conference (4 pages): • Appointment of the first UN
- In general: urge the appointment of the UN Special Representative on violence against children asap; Special Representative On
recognize community’s role in addressing the issue etc Violence Against Children in May
- Specifically (per 8 sub-themes i.e. child abuse, parenting, girls and the internet, domestic violence, 2009
FGM, forced and early marriage, honour-related violence, son preference) • Survey sent to participants for
• Literature on conference themes monitoring i.e. asks major
• Justification of conference theme (overview of previous related conferences) recommendations taken to heart
• Conceptual background on meaning of childhood, girls etc or implemented etc and results
• Outcomes of the 8 thematic workshops (summary, case studies, discussions and will be published on website
recommendations) • Conference scheduled for
• Setting the context of the conference which is a follow up to the 2006 UN study in violence November 2009 for highlighting
against children achievements
• Conclusions and next steps
o Preamble on objectives of conference, concerns regarding current state of the issue, recognition Possible follow-up actions to the Rio
of international frameworks Declaration have been identified at
o Review of progress/challenges since previous related conference (including ratification of the conference in Strasbourg (2/3 June
international instruments, adoption of legislative measures, development of national plans, 2009). See paper “Third World
multilateral agreements and remaining challenges/concerns related to identifying vulnerable Congress on Sexual Exploitation of
children, coordinating action, enforcing law, child participation, lack of resources, lack of reliable Children and
disaggregated data etc) Adolescents: Some Thoughts about a
o Declaration from participants: highlighting future cooperation efforts etc European Follow-up.” (Prof. Jaap E.
o Call for Action (in numbered points): participants call on states to act vis-à-vis a number of Doek)
frameworks:
a) International and regional instruments (ratification)
b) Forms of sexual exploitation (Child pornography and online abuse images, Sexual
exploitation of children in prostitution and in tourism, Trafficking and sexual exploitation)
c) Legal framework and enforcement of law

Ombudswork For Children
(Athens, 29-30 September
2006)
Kids Behind Bars – A
child rights perspective
(Bethlehem, June 2005)
East Asia and Pacific
Regional Consultation on
Violence Against Children
(Bangkok from 11 to 16
June 2005)
Europe and Central Asia
Regional Consultation for
the UN Study on violence
against children (5 -7 July
2005, Ljubljana, Slovenia)
2nd World Congress
against commercial
sexual exploitation of
children (Yokohama
December 2001)
2nd International
Workshop on Indigenous
Children and Youth
(Geneva 2001)
Statement of the conference
and Conclusions
https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDo
c.jsp?id=1183245&Site=COE
&BackColorInternet=99B5A
D&BackColorIntranet=FABF4
5&BackColorLogged=FFC67
9
Bethlehem Declaration
Report on the East Asia and
Pacific Regional
Consultation on Violence
Against Children
(concluding statement and
set of recommendations are
part of the report)
Report on the Europe and
Central Asia Regional
Consultation on Violence
Against Children
(recommendations and
Ljubljana Conclusions part
of the report
http://www.crin.org/resourc
es/infoDetail.asp?ID=5838&
flag=report)
Congress Outcome
document:
The Yokohama Global
Commitment 2001
http://www.unicef.org/even
ts/yokohama/outcome.html
(html page)
Report/outcomes as limited
number of bullet points at
the end of the report
d) Integrated cross-sectional policies and national plans of action
e) International Cooperation
f) Social responsibility initiatives
g) Monitoring
o Follow-up
Summary of conference
o General statement recalling issue, dissonance between international framework and national
policies, consequences of issue
o Call for Government Action (i.e. to refrain from specific actions/encourage others)
o Call for action to other partners (UN, NGO/civil society, media)
o Concluding statement (bullet points)
o Set of recommendations (bullet points) per context:
a) Home
b) School
c) Institutions
d) Work
e) Community
f) Conflict with the law
g) Cyberspace
o Recommendations (bullet points per context)
o Conclusions include: reference to international frameworks (UNCRC, Optional Protocols etc),
description of the scope of the issue, agreement to take priority actions (in numbered points)
including ratification of international treaties, public info campaigns, establishing systems of data
collection, developing systematic education on child protection
o Developments since 1st World Congress in Stockholm (mobilization of governments and NGOs; Rio Declaration
role of private sector; participation of children; entry into force of legislative frameworks)
o Recall set of regional consultations and seminars
o Global Commitment including ratification of international treaties, developing national agendas,
networking among actors, resource allocation etc (12 points)
o Appendix: explanatory statements on the Yokohama Commitment from European countries, USA,
Iran, India, Arab and African States
o Set of bullet points including the adoption of the Statement on Indigenous Children and Armed
Conflict, a set of recommendations and planning the 3rd conference
Children, torture and Outcome document (56 o Tampere Declaration (including who attended, participants’
other forms of pages) concerns/recognition/recommendations - in numbered points - to UN and States)
violence (27 November- 2 o Final recommendations to State parties to define more precisely States’ obligations against
December 2001, Tampere violence against children:
- Finland) a) General forms of violence: legislative measures, monitoring, investigations, reintegration,
staff capacity, funding, international cooperation
b) Specific forms of violence: Violence in juvenile systems, violence in child institutions,
violence in school, violence in the family, sexual violence/trafficking, child slavery
o Regional Plans of action (e.g. Africa: actions in conflict and post conflict situations, trafficking,
religious practices, children in conflict with the law, follow up)
o Interpretation of torture within the framework of the rights of the child
o Situations of torture
o Need for Special Rapporteur on violence against children
o Proposal framework for UN study on violence against children
International Conference 3 Key Outcome Documents 1. Youth Statement highlights main priorities on a set of topics
on War-affected Children (as appendix of 110 page 2. (a) Knowledge advancement
(Winnipeg, Canada 10-17 conference report): (b) Identification of major immediate commitments
2000) 1. Youth Statement (Youth (c) Fundamental priorities per theme and per institution (government, non-state entity, corporate
Meeting) actors, UN, civil society, youth, media, families)
2. A Framework for 3. Call for action in numbered points
Commitment to War-
Affected Children (Experts
Meeting)
3. The Agenda for War-
Affected Children
(Ministerial Meeting)
Recommendations from
thematic workshops (as
appendix)
Appendix 2: Tables and figures

Table 2: Examples of data sources

Name Institution Timeframe Focus
Civic Education Study Funded by National Reports released in 2001 US ninth-graders’
survey Center for Education knowledge of democratic
Statistics practices and institutions
across democracy,
Pilot phase data national identity and
collected by the American international relations
Institutes for Research, and social cohesion and
and Westat, Inc. handled diversity, compared with
field operations in the US the knowledge of
students in 27 other
participating countries
DHS Funded by US Agency for Conducted every five Population, health and
International years nutrition
Development (USAID),
with contributions from
other donors
European Quality of Life Eurofound Latest survey 2007 Adults (18 and over)
Survey resident in the EU-25
countries. A range of
issues, e.g. employment,
income, education,
housing, family, health,
work–life balance, life
satisfaction and
perceived quality of
society
ESPAD Swedish Council for Fourth data collection Adolescent substance
Information on Alcohol published results in 2009 use in the world
and Other Drugs
coordinates the project
European Social Survey Funded by European Biennial survey Media use, social and
Commission’s (EC’s) public trust, political
Framework Programmes, Currently undergoing fifth interest and
the European Science round; data to be participation, socio-
Foundation and national released in September political orientations,
funding bodies in each 2011 governance and efficacy,
country moral, political and
social values, social
Directed by the Centre for exclusion, national,
Comparative Social ethnic and religious
Surveys, City University, allegiances, well-being,
UK health and security,
human values,
demographics and
socioeconomics
European Community EC Total duration of panel Living conditions: income
Household Panel Survey survey from 1994 to 2001 information, financial
situation in a wider
sense, working life,
housing situation, social
relations, health and
biographical information

52
Name Institution
Eurostat Population and Eurostat/EC
Social Conditions
EU Statistics on Income Eurostat/EC
and Living Conditions
International Association IEA headquarters and
for the Evaluation of national research
Educational Achievement institutes in participating
(IEA) Civic Education countries, Humboldt
study University of Berlin and
the International Steering
Committee
Since 1998, the German
Science Association has
been among its major
funding partners
Luxembourg Income Luxembourg Income
Study Study Center
OECD health database OECD
OECD Society at a Glance OECD
Timeframe
Annual collection of data,
although rates at which
data is consolidated vary
from country to country
Launched in 2003
Cross-sectional data in a
given time or time period
and longitudinal data at
the individual level over a
four-year period
Major reports released in
2001 and 2002
International data
released in 2003
Data available on average
on a four- to five-year
period
Annual release
Latest data available
2009
53
Focus
Population, health,
education and training,
labour market, living
conditions and social
protection, crime and
criminal justice, culture
Income, poverty, social
exclusion and other living
conditions
Civic education (how
students view their
citizenship identity and
how views are influenced
by political, educational
and social contexts)
Household variables (e.g.
composition,
demographic info, labour
market information,
expenditure variables)
and personal-level
variables (demographic,
labour, income)
Key indicators covering
health status, health
resources and utilisation:
life expectancy, maternal
and infant mortality,
health employment,
inpatient beds, medical
technology,
immunisation, average
length of stay,
discharges, surgical
procedures and
transplants and dialyses
Headline social
indicators, leisure,
general context, self-
sufficiency, equity,
health, social cohesion
OECD Education at a OECD Annual release Who participates in
Glance education, what is spent
on it, how education
systems operate and
results achieved (e.g.
student performance,
impact of education on
earnings and
employment chances)
OECD Income Distribution OECD Trend data available Income distribution and
and Poverty since mid-1980s poverty
PISA Organised by the OECD Administered every three 15-year-olds’ capabilities
years in reading literacy,
mathematics literacy and
Most recent science literacy
administration in 2006
on science literacy
Progress in International Coordinated by the IEA Five-year cycles, latest Reading achievement
Reading Literacy Study information 2006 and reading behaviours
and attitudes of fourth
grade students
TIMSS IEA Reports every four years. State-of-the-art
Current: TIMSS 2011 assessments of student
achievement supported
with extensive data about
country, school and
classroom learning
environments
WHO Mortality Database WHO From 1979 to 2005, latest Deaths and underlying
survey results 2005 causes of deaths
WHO HBSC In collaboration with Most recent survey: 2001- Young people’s health
WHO Regional Office for 2002 and well-being, health
Europe behaviours and their
social context
World Bank World World Bank Latest information 2009 Over 800 indicators
Development Indicators across more than 90
tables organised in six
sections: world view,
people, environment,
economy, states and
markets and global links
World Bank Health, World Bank Data available for 1980, Population dynamics,
Nutrition and Population 1990, 2000 and 2007 nutrition, reproductive
data health, health financing,
medical resources and
usage, immunisation,
infectious diseases,
HIV/AIDS
World Bank Gender World Bank Data available for 2000, Demographics,
Statistics 2004 and 2007 education, health, labour
force, political
participation and gender
monitoring

54
Table 3: Committee on the Rights of the Child concluding observations on fragile
states (2008-2009)
Main areas of concern 23 Key challenges identified by the Committee

Legislation Slow progress/lack of progress in reforming legislation to

achieve harmonisation with the Convention; often hindered by
lack of human and financial resources.
Coordination National Council for Children lacks mandate, human and
financial resources to implement convention (DRC); National
Committee for the Survival, Protection and Development of
Children poorly staffed and regional committees not yet set up
(Niger); Ministry for the Promotion of Women and Children
receives small funding from state budget (Niger); delay in
adoption of proposal for creation of inter-ministerial committee
to oversee implementation of the Convention; difficulty of
coordination given vastness of state party’s territory and weak
governance at local level (Chad); insufficient coordination
between Ministry of Social Affairs (coordinating body) and
National Council for Children (consultative body) (Mauritania);
national coordination of implementation of the Convention not
sustained, lack of information on mandate and resources to
national and regional coordinating bodies (Eritrea); lack of
national mechanism to coordinate activities (Djibouti).
National action plan Lack of a comprehensive national plan on promotion/protection
of the rights of the child.
Independent monitoring National Human Rights Monitoring Centre not integrated into the
new 2006 constitution (DRC); National Commission on Human
Rights and Fundamental Freedom lacks human and financial
resources to conduct its mandate (Niger); no ombudsman or
independent national institution specialised in children’s rights
(Chad); National Human Rights Commission lacks resources and
is not accessible to children (Mauritania); lack of independent
national human rights institution to monitor and promote the
Convention (Eritrea); lack of independence and resources in the
National Human Rights Sub-commission for the Protection of the
Rights of the Child; overlap between role of Sub-commission
and Office of the Ombudsman (Djibouti).
Allocation of resources for children Insufficient allocation to health and education sectors (DRC,
Chad, Mauritania) and advancement of children and women
(Djibouti); no child rights approach in the elaboration of the
state budget/no visibility to investment in children/imprecise
allocations (Niger, Mauritania, Eritrea); transferring funds to
decentralised levels of government remains a challenge,
Ministry for Social Action and the Family (responsible for
implementing the Convention) does not receive adequate
financial and human resources to carry out its work (Chad);
insufficient resources to improve the implementation and
protection of human rights, with considerable military
expenditure vs. education or health (Eritrea).

23 Some areas of concern have been grouped together for easier analysis.

55
Data collection
Cooperation with civil society
Best interest of child/respect for the views Limited evidence that these are primary considerations by the
of the child/family environment
Birth registration
Health and access to health
care/adolescent health/right to an
adequate standard of living
Education
Children in armed conflict/recovery and
reintegration
Economic and sexual
exploitation/trafficking/refugee and
displaced children/street children
Juvenile justice
Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/sessions.htm.
Absence of efficient data collection system: National Statistical
Research Centre lacks the capacity to carry out its work and
insufficient attention paid from appropriate ministries (DRC);
National Institute of Statistics inadequately staffed and financed
to assess progress in the implementation of child rights (Chad);
lack of collection in several areas, including child abuse, sexual
exploitation and child labour (Eritrea); lack of capacity to
centralise and analyse data (Djibouti).
Limited cooperation with insufficient financial assistance
provided to NGOs and lack of official policy for systematic
cooperation (DRC); cases of intimidation, threats and violence
against some human rights advocates (Chad); severe
administration and practical restrictions upon operation of
international and national NGOs (Eritrea).
legislative, executive and judicial branches of power (e.g. in
Djibouti separation of child in cases of abuse and neglect is not
possible owing to lack of appropriate infrastructure; family code
not yet adopted and polygamy remains a common practice in
Niger); lack of decentralised state services to reinforce capacity
of families; family allowances paid only to limited number of
families; children deprived of their family environment cannot
be integrated in centres of alternative care (Niger).
Inadequate institutional structures, particularly in rural areas,
leading to low/decreasing registration levels. Specific problems
can be encountered in registering certain ethnic groups (Chad).
Lack of access to basic health and social services, lack of
qualified health practitioners, medical facilities concentrated in
urban areas; no adequate services for adolescent healthcare;
lack of access to clean drinking water, inadequate shelter and
basic sanitation facilities, chronic food insecurity.
Insufficient access to primary education, poor educational
infrastructure, overcrowding in classrooms, schooling costs
remain relatively high, small percentage of qualified teachers,
teachers irregularly paid, lack of learning materials.
Failure to protect children and prevent violations by non-state
groups (DRC); minimum age for voluntary or compulsory
recruitment not specified by law (Niger); recruitment and use of
children by all parties of the conflict, small number only have
been demobilised since 2007 (Chad); forced underage
recruitment and lack of physical and psychological recovery for
children affected by armed conflict (Eritrea).
Lack of data and statistics at the national level and of updated
information on initiatives to combat these; impunity for
perpetrators and very limited resources devoted to the fight
against this; issues not fully recognised by the state party, lack
of coordination between ministries and lack of resources
provided to victims.
Lack of human and financial resources allocated to specialised
juvenile courts and quasi absence of institutions for the
placement of children who can be detained for long periods in
same structures/prisons as adults.
56
Figure 2: Relative weight of the five areas within our sample of CRIN resources

Figure 3: Protection – major issues covered

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 4: Protection – regional coverage

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

57
Figure 5: Protection – gender-sensitive coverage

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 6: Development – major issues covered

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 7: Development – regional coverage

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

58
Figure 8: Survival – major issues covered

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 9: Survival – regional coverage

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 10: HIV/AIDS – major issues covered

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

59
Figure 11: HIV/AIDS – regional coverage

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 12: Views of the child – major issues covered

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

Figure 13: Views of the child – regional coverage

Source: Authors’ compilation from http://www.crin.org/.

60
Table 4: Select Northern and Southern child-related communities of practice
Name Year of Description Stages/types of impact
launch (Keck-Sikkink)
Research
ChildWatch 1993 Global, non-governmental Framing debates and agenda setting/
International Research network of institutions that encouraging discursive commitments
Centre collaborate in child research from states and policy actors
for the promotion of child ChildWatch encourages multidisciplinary
http://www.childwatch. rights and well-being research on children, organises training
uio.no/ in this field and supports policy
development through the organisation of
conferences
Research Programme 2005 Aims at building a body of Framing debates and agenda setting
Consortium on Women's knowledge that will strengthen Works in three areas: research to
Empowerment in bottom-up transformations document and analyse women
Muslim Contexts relatively to women empowerment strategies, capacity
empowerment in Muslim building through strategic alliances and
http://www.wemc.com. contexts communication of transformative
hk/web/about.htm knowledge to marginalised women
Based in China, works in
partnership with eight key
organisations from the North
and the South (including the
International Gender Studies
Centre, Oxford University, and
the Centre for Environment,
Gender and Development) and
it is has been funded by DFID
since 2006 (funding will end in
June 2011)
Child protection from violence, exploitation and abuse
Campaign against Child 1992 A network of over 6000 anti- Framing debates and agenda setting
Labour child labour groups spread A National Coordination Committee
over 21 states in India, Meeting was held in September 2008
http://www.caclindia.or committed to eradicate child and produced a Future Action Plan
g/ labour through building public
opinion, investigation of
abuse, advocacy and
monitoring of national and
international development
plans
Asia Against Child 2002 Part of the International Framing debates and agenda
Trafficking Campaign against Child setting/encouraging discursive
Trafficking coordinated by commitments from states and policy
http://www.cridoc.net/ Terre des Hommes, Germany actors
asia_acts.php and the International Lobbies governments and authorities to
Federation of Terre des implement human rights standards for
Hommes. It works as a regional trafficked children (through national
campaign to fight child legislation, the creation of regional
trafficking in Brunei protection mechanisms, cooperation,
Darussalam, Myanmar, support to victims, prosecution of
Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao offenders)
People’s Democratic Republic,
Philippines, Thailand and
Vietnam

61
Name Year of Description Stages/types of impact
launch (Keck-Sikkink)
ECPAT 1996 In 2007 the network included Affecting policy change
over 80 groups in more than 70 ECPAT supports legal research on
http://www.ecpat.net/E countries working together for domestic legislation, analyses gaps in
I/Ecpat_vision.asp the elimination of child standards so as to recommend reforms
prostitution, pornography and in child protection and offers advisory
trafficking for sexual purposes service on child-friendly laws and
procedures to protect children from
exploitation

The Coalition to Fight 1995
Against Child
Exploitation (FACE)
http://www.un.or.th/Tra
ffickingProject/FACE/fac
e_home.html
The African Network for 2007
the Prevention and
Protection against Child
Abuse and Neglect
http://www.childtraffick
inginafrica.org/
Operates in Thailand at both
the policy and the grassroots
levels
Members include the Center for
the Protection of Children's
Rights, Development &
Education Programmes for
Daughters and Communities
Centre, Friends of Thai Women
Workers in Asia and Child
Workers in Asia
Based in Nairobi, works in
partnership with other
organisations against child
maltreatment in Africa
Framing debates and agenda
setting/encouraging discursive
commitments from states and policy
actors
FACE started with the aim to monitor the
justice system in Thailand (assisting in
obtaining evidence from victimised
children, accompanying these to court)
and is now also active with local and
international NGOs in lobbying for laws,
raising awareness through education
and mass media and cooperating
against the prosecution of offenders
Framing debates and agenda setting
Its anti-trafficking programme aims at
raising awareness and increases the
capacity building of service providers
towards eliminating child trafficking in
Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda

Stop Child Labour 2000 An Alliance2015 campaign, a
partnership of seven like-
http://www.stopchildla minded NGOs from Italy
bour.net/ (Cesvi), German Agro Action,
the Netherlands (Hivos),
Denmark (Ibis), Czech Republic
(People in Need) and Ireland
(Concern), France (Agency for
Technical Cooperation and
Development) seeking to
eliminate child labour through
provision of full-time education
Global Initiative to end 2001 Endorsed by UNICEF, the UN
all corporal punishment Educational, Scientific and
of children Cultural Organization
(UNESCO), the UN Office of the
http://www.endcorporal High Commissioner for Human
punishment.org/ Rights (UNOHCHR) and a large
number of organisations and
individuals
Framing debates and agenda setting
The campaign’s two core objectives
include ending all forms of child labour
and supporting the global campaign for
education
Framing debates and agenda
setting/encouraging discursive
commitments from states and policy
actors
Aims at forming an alliance of human
rights agencies to ensure visibility of
corporal punishment, lobby
governments and provide capacity
building to support states in adopting
reforms against this practice

62
Name Year of Description
launch
Respect Works Out 2007 Partnership between Germany
(Association for a New
http://www.respectwork Education), UK (the National
s.eu/ Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Children) and Poland
(the Nobody–Children
Foundation) aiming at securing
a non-violent upbringing of the
child through support to
parenting skills and law
reforms for the abolishment of
physical punishment
UNICEF Child Poverty 2008 Core, global network of child
Network (ChildPov-Net) poverty experts who foster
knowledge sharing and
collaboration across every region
Learn Without Fear Plan is defined as a ‘child-
(Plan) centred community
development organisation’
http://plan- working with children and
international.org/learnw communities all over the world
ithoutfear/learn- on eight core areas (education,
without- health, water and sanitation,
fear?set_language=en protection, economic security,
emergencies, child
participation and sexual health
including HIV) funded primarily
through child sponsorship
from individuals across 18
countries to 49 developing
countries (Africa 23, Americas
13, Asia 13)
Stages/types of impact
(Keck-Sikkink)
Framing debates and agenda setting
50,000 copies of booklet on non-violent
child raising have been disseminated in
each partner country
Framing debates and agenda setting
A forum for discussing concepts and
frameworks, exchanging experiences
and information
Framing debates and agenda
setting/encouraging discursive
commitments from states and policy
actors
Key aims of the campaign include
persuading governments to enforce laws
against violence in schools, working
with teachers and school leaders to
promote alternative discipline methods
and creating awareness to tackle
violence in schools in developing
countries

Learn Without Fear aims to end

violence against children in all
schools in developing
countries (focus specifically on
sexual violence, bullying and
corporal punishment).
Partners of the campaign
include, among others, UNICEF,
ActionAid, the African Child
Policy Forum, the Global
Initiative to end all corporal
punishment of children
‘Raise your hand against 2008 Europe-wide initiative against Framing debates and agenda
smacking!’ (birth) corporal punishment, launched setting/encouraging discursive
by the Council of Europe, commitments from states and policy
http://www.coe.int/t/dc aiming at challenging society’s actors
/files/themes/chatimen perception of corporal The focus of the campaign is on three
ts_corporels/default_EN punishment alongside pillars: legal reform (promoting a ban on
.asp? implementing legal reforms corporal punishment in all member
that ban it states), positive parenting and
awareness raising

63
Name Year of Description Stages/types of impact
launch (Keck-Sikkink)
Survival and development (nutrition, health, water and sanitation)
World Alliance for 1991 Global network of individuals Framing debates and agenda setting
Breastfeeding Action and organisations aimed at Inter alia, holds the WABA Global Forum
promoting, protection and and acts as a platform to spotlight
www.waba.org.my/ supporting breastfeeding relevant information in the field
worldwide

Works in liaison with UNICEF

Global WASH Campaign 2001
http://www.wsscc.org/e
n/what-we-
do/advocacy-
communications/global
-wash-
campaign/index.htm
Basic education and gender equality
Global Campaign for 1999
Education (GCE)
http://www.global.cam
paignforeducation.org/a
bout/about.html
As a response to failing to
recognise sanitation as a goal
at the UN Millennium Summit
(2000), it is a worldwide
advocacy campaign to raise
public and political awareness
of safe water, adequate
sanitation and hygiene
services
CSOs, NGOs, teacher unions
and child rights activists
mobilising public pressure on
governments and the
international community to
implement the Education for
All Goals and Strategies agreed
by 185 governments (Dakar,
April 2000)
Encouraging discursive commitments
from states and policy actors
WASH is now a global concept
understood across sectors. The
campaign achieved the inclusion of
sanitation to the MDGs at the World
Summit for Sustainable Development in
2002 (MDG7, Target 10)
Individual and local WASH campaign
activities have been set up in more than
30 countries
Framing debates and agenda setting
The GCE World Assembly produces
resolutions every three years (most
recently in São Paolo, Brazil, in 2008)

The GCE calls specifically upon

communities to develop plans
of actions for delivering free
and quality public education,
upon governments to abolish
fees for primary education,
upon the World Bank and the
North to increase aid for basic
education and upon CSOs to
hold their governments
accountable for securing the
right to education
HIV/AIDS
JLICA 2006 Time-limited network of Encouraging discursive commitments
(close) policymakers, practitioners, from states and policy actors
http://www.jlica.org/in researchers, community The JLICA final report (recently released
dex.php leaders and people living with in February 2009) is addressed to
HIV/AIDS to mobilise research national policymakers in burdened
and discussion on children countries and calls upon governments to
affected by HIV/AIDS shift policies and programmes towards
addressing family poverty and gender
The initiative conducted inequality as conditions for the
research around four Learning effectiveness of large scale AIDS

64
Name Year of Description
launch
Groups which have generated
more than 50 systematic
reviews and research products.
It concluded its work in June
2009 with the release of its
final report which summarises
evidence of two years of
research and analysis
Policy advocacy and partnerships for children’s rights
ACPF 2003 A pan-African policy advocacy
centre based in Addis Ababa
http://www.africanchild with the mission of putting
forum.org/index.asp African children on the public
agenda through the following
four advocacy strategies: 1)
building knowledge about
African children; 2) speaking
out against child rights
violations; 3) reforming laws
and policies affecting children
in Africa; and 4) building
alliances of child rights
organisations
It aims at providing a forum for
dialogue and improved
knowledge of African children,
promoting African action to
develop and implement
effective policies and
programmes
Its 2007-2011 Business Plan
includes: 1) child rights
advocacy (incl. promotion of
the African Information Hub as
a platform to strengthen the
information base on the state
of African children); 2) child
protection (including auditing
of national laws and practices
and research on public policy
impacts on child well-being);
3) children’s voice and
participation (including
carrying out polls, supporting
the development of artistic
talent in children and
promoting access of children
to mass media)
ANDI 1992 ANDI believes that quality of
information is key to building
www.andi.org.br/ awareness and fostering
constant change within
65
Stages/types of impact
(Keck-Sikkink)
programmes
Encouraging discursive commitments
from states and policy actors
The ‘African Report on Child Well-being:
How Child-friendly Are African
governments?’ was prepared by the
ACPF (www.africanchildinfo.net/
africanreport08/index.php). Its recent
launch (November 2008) makes
evaluations on its take-up premature but
its groundbreaking nature is evident in
scoring the performance of African
governments in improving child well-
being. Governments are ranked as ‘most
child friendly’ (e.g. Namibia, Tunisia,
South Africa), ‘child friendly’, ‘fairly child
friendly’, ‘less child friendly’ and ‘least
child friendly’ (including Chad, Liberia,
Eritrea)
It also stresses the dissonance between
countries’ formal acceptance of an
international treaty and practice, such as
the decrease in government budgetary
commitment
Specific actions are suggested for
African governments to improve
performance in child friendliness
(expanding primary health care and
education, addressing the growing
orphan population and violence against
children, strengthening legal capacity to
fight child abuse, addressing needs of
children with disabilities and lobbying
for accountability of states to their
citizens
Framing debates and agenda setting
Changing behaviour: ANDI has led to
important changes in the ways in which
journalists and editors of newspapers in
Name Year of Description Stages/types of impact
launch (Keck-Sikkink)
societies and recognises the Brazil and other parts of Latin America
importance of creating a report on children. Since the year 2000 a
culture of responsibility for the total of 346 journalists have been
quality of public information trained and honoured recognition
and the inclusion of children
as key stakeholders in the
national development agenda.
It is thus specialised in
working with media in
awareness raising, capacity
building and mobilisation in
the field of child rights

ANDI Network Brazil was

created in 2000 and
encompasses 11 organisations
working closely to spotlight
childhood on the media
agenda. Monitoring of media
relative to coverage of child
issues is among the main
activities conducted as well as
training of professionals in this
field (e.g. ‘Journalists Friends
of Children’ project). In this
respect, the function of
‘community builders’ (i.e.
promoting and sustaining the
values and standards of the
individuals or organisations
within them) is predominant
(Mendizabal, 2006)

Among other initiatives, it

aims at strengthening the
system of protection of rights,
at improving means of access,
production and delivery of
communication, at
encouraging child and
adolescent participation in
media and society at large, at
improving access and quality
of primary education and at
directing public policy around
childhood and adolescence

66
Table 5: Frameworks for understanding children/childhood and policy purchase
Framework Description
Development Childhood as a biological phase,
psychology/stage human competence is a function of
theories age, universal characteristics between
boys and girls
Children as immature in a state of
development, rejected as social actors
Children needs are perceived and
derived from adults assumptions
Rights-based Recognition of the right to participate
and evolving capacities of the child
(UNCRC) but child remains an immature
being in need of protection
Reflects dominant Western concepts of
childhood (innocence and play)
Sociology of childhood Childhood is a concept that is socially
constructed
Children are competent social actors
Children cannot be treated as a
monolith; experiences are varied along
lines of gender, ethnicity and social
class
Examples of impact on policy and
purchase
Education: schooling structured in age
grades; school agendas and curricula
decided by governments; no attention to
linkages between what happens at school
and out of school
Health
Social work (child professionals, mother
education)
Anti-child labour legislation
Birth registration policies
Child participation in education, work and
national development plans
Indirect targeting recognises the existence
of intergenerational dynamics within the
household and the impact that policies
have on children as a differentiated
category of actors

The concept of the Generational Order

highlights that age-based
categorisations are not natural
distinctions but socially constructed
and underpinned by social inequalities
Source: Authors’ compilation.

Figure 14: Knowledge generation and translation cycle

Source: Adapted from the CIHR Knowledge to Action Cycle at www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/39033.html.

67
Table 6: Key messages for understanding the research–policy–practice interface
The research–policy interface: a. Quality of research
Ingredients for successful research- b. Intent to shape policy
based policy influencing c. Understanding the political context
(Jones, 2008) d. Networking with key actors
e. Packaging of messages
The policy–practice 1. Framing debates and agenda setting
interface: 2. Discursive commitments from states and policy actors
Possible impacts of evidence- 3. Securing procedural changes from policy actors
based policy 4. Affecting policy
(Keck and Sikkink, 1998) 5. Changing the behaviour of target actors

68
Appendix 3: Major authors of information from CRIN mapping
The CRIN mapping in Section 4 also mapped authors/institutions generating information/ knowledge
on child-related issues. These encompass a range of organisations from both developed and
developing countries. The table highlights those recurrent in our mapping exercise.

Themes Major authors of publications in our sample of CRIN resources

Survival Gaza Community Mental Health Programme (OPT)
Save the Children
UNICEF
Development Amnesty International
Council of Europe
CRIN
International Save the Children Alliance/Save the Children
Tamer Institute for Community Education (OPT)
Understanding Children’s Work
UNESCO
Plan
Views of the child UNICEF IRC
HIV/AIDS ACPF
Asia Catalyst
Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR)
Childhope UK
Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance (EAA)
Human Rights Watch (HRW)
International HIV/AIDS Alliance
International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF)
JLICA
Kindernothilfe
Mercy Corps
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF)
Plan International
Save the Children Sweden
Save the Children UK
Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
UNESCO
UNICEF
Protection Amnesty International
Anti-Slavery International (UK)
Council of Europe
CRIN
Defence for Children International (DCI) (Switzerland)
Gaza Community Mental Health Programme (OPT)
Global Initiative to End All Corporal Punishment of Children
HRW
ILO
Land Center for Human Rights (Egypt)
NGO Group for the Convention on the Rights of the Child
Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons
Plan
Save the Children
Understanding Children’s Work
UNICEF
UNICEF IRC
UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)
UNOHCHR

69
Overseas Development Institute
111 Westminster Bridge Road
London SE1 7JD
UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7922 0300
Fax: +44 (0)20 7922 0399
Email: publications@odi.org.uk
Website: www.odi.org.uk
ISBN 978 1 907288 27 2
Working Paper (Print) ISSN 1759 2909
ODI Working Papers (Online) ISSN 1759 2917