Now If I Find A Stamp I Can Save The World Nov.6.09

November 6 2009 Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc.
34 Riverglen Drive, Keswick, On L4P 2P8
T/F 905-476-8959 Cell 904-251- 1413

www.cdfji.ca 1@cdfji.ca
1 LIFE
RCMP NCO Staff Sgt. R.B. MacAdam www.1life.cC
robert.macadam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Re: Your Report on my evidence

Government Organized Crime Charter Democracy Force
Correspondence Follows www.charterdemocracyforce.ca
Frank Gallagher
www.cwj.cC 1@charterdemocracyforce.ca
Hi Bob
As you know I am determined to expose the government organized crime if it kills me, and I would
appreciate your cooperation in these most serious times regarding these most serious issues.
It assuredly concerns you as I am sure you know as do all the other government personnel involved or
cooperatives of the conspiracy against the 80% majority … a phenomenon world wide since long
before the world became a sphere and a way before Jesus was born and for fact long before Confucius
551 BC – 479 BC world renown for his wisdom grasped “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” the epitome
of simplicity and sanity that has forever blown in the wind well understood by us all at 5 prior to the
first day of school that meets the priority of evidence that gives credence to that which is least apt to be
mistaken by humankind being particularly important to these issues as it is “The Spirit of the Law”
invisible and invincible impossible to miscomprehend by sane people who know well what is and what
is not receptive to fellow human beings and assuredly every individual would want to be perceived as
being sane and of the status of the presumption of innocence in compliance with “The Spirit of the
Law”
Of course they do if they are sane being why they do their evil deeds in the cover of darkness even if it
is broad day-light.
Constitution Act, 1982: Document (The Authority)
Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law
To be certain that the readers of this document … you of course and me are on the same page I have
provided a list of words that have been applied to meaning commonly known and used by the English
speaking populace that were originally intended to make communications between people seemingly
simple and sane once they grasp the concept, and of course truth is ultimately preferred so as to not
exasperate the intended purpose.
Assuredly the meanings attached to the words that are commonly used by the people have the same
meaning when used by all government personnel especially those involved in administration and
enforcement of the laws, for it would be simply impossible for the common folk to abide by “The Spirit
of the Law” that protects us all equally when the Constitution: Establishment is the personification of
“The Spirit of the Law” prerequisite to materialize it that unequivocally means due the simplicity and
1
sanity of “The Spirit of the Law” that we all understand at 5 prior to the first day of school on the
presumption that we are all sane persons that make a career administering and enforcing the law should
be able to determine who is and who is not in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” if they are sane and
human.
One would assuredly expect that persons specifically educated, trained and experienced to administer
and enforce the laws would be particularly coherent to the laws that must be consistent with the
Constitution, assuredly intended to protect every individual as equally guaranteed and equally
benefitted before and under the law.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal
protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without
discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or
physical disability.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent
with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Consistency is obviously mandatory and of course “The Letter of the Law” bows to “The Spirit of the
Law” being an invisible and invincible thing that cannot possibly be touched by humankind, being
rather a good thing with humans prone to err, deliberately or otherwise, but first it would be prudent to
go no further until we look at the meanings attached to the commonly used words, a necessity if we are
to be in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” in mutual understanding for communication purposes for
assuredly we do not need to know the meaning of any words other than the words of the “Golden Rule”
being a natural that we can all understand at 5 prior to the first day of school on the presumption that
we are all sane, and of course we know that we are all not, nor are we all in, of and with “The Spirit of
the Law” being precisely why the people need to believe that the entire government personnel involved
in the legal system that protects all equally are sane, unbiased, competent, responsible and
irreproachable in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” and know that it is the people that are not that
you people are required to deal with consistently administering due punishment with exemplary
attentiveness to deterrence when a person has been determined to have messed with another’s
guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits.
It is really very simple once you get the hang of it, presumably quite easy when we all understand at 5
prior to the first day of school on the presumption we are all sane.
Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle
Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability, dominance
Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ
Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism
Egalitarianism: parity, fairness, equal opportunity, impartiality
Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude
Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity
Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity
Sanity: Good sense, wisdom, reason, understanding, common sense, sense, judgement.
Humanity: Humankind, civilization, people, human race, kindness, charity, compassion, sympathy
Honourable: Admirable, worthy, praiseworthy, moral, principled, good, respectable, upright
Freedom: Liberty, autonomy, lack of restrictions, self determination, independence, choice, free will, sovereignty.
2
Abrogate: do away with something: to end an agreement or contract formally and publicly
Simplicity: Ease, straightforwardness, effortless, plainness, minimalism, unfussiness, cleanness
Even illiterates have to obey the law, which means it is a damn good thing “The Spirit of the Law” is a
natural to sane human beings that know well of what is and what is not receptive to each other at 5
prior to the first day of school as even them not in “The Spirit of the Law” know enough to do their evil
deeds under the cover of darkness even in broad day-light on the presumption they are sane.
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free
and democratic society.
Do you know what a guarantee is Bob?
Guarantee: Assurance, promise, pledge, agreement, security, warranty, certification, undertaking
Do you know who made the guarantee, what was guaranteed, who was guaranteed, when and where it is
written?
Does it guarantee persons not in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” or does it guarantee persons presumed
to be in of and with “The Spirit of the Law”?
Of course it guarantees every individual equality, but in absolute adverse context in reference to them
proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt as we are all presumed to be of the status of the presumption of
innocence in absence of evidence to suggest otherwise.
Do you know what evidence is and its major role in determining whether or not one is guilty or innocent?
Did you know that all evidence relative to a charge, for or against is pertinent being why you and all persons
involved in investigating must be unbiased, competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and
conviction to determine the truth?
Were you wanting to same something Bob, I see you scratching your head?
Did you know that you must do your job fairly unobstructed in performance of your duty to gather all
pertinent evidence, for or against, being representative of the people that you are required to equally protect
and benefit and only consistent truth as would be observed by God whether or not He exists or whether or
not one believes He exists is prerequisite?
You do understand the concept of equality and who is equal to who right?
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all
matters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and
3
Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all
matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
God damn it Bob … you are equal to me and I am equal to you … Brian Mulroney is equal to me and I am
equal to him in all matters under and before the law.
Go ahead Bob, you try one … maybe two
Okay then …. Bob … okay then.
So it is decided that every person found guilty of a crime must be consistently punished equally and fairly
being their guaranteed Charter right and of course if all relative evidence is not collected without prejudice
either the victim or the alleged would be treated unfairly Eh?
I mean you cannot have a 2 Tier system Right?
With the wealthy victim provided the services of the police and upon collecting all pertinent evidence it is
assessed that there is reasonable evidence to charge a person the police would do so and the Crown
Attorney would take it from there, purportedly acting on behalf of the public interest
However the public would not want to punish an innocent person and assuredly that concerns every
individual being presumed innocent and all and wouldn’t want to be found in such a predicament.
They would want to know that there is no chance that they would be railroaded for one reason or another
and would like to be assured that the police are unbiased, competent responsible and irreproachable with
fortitude and conviction to gather all evidence to determine the truth no matter who it is for or against and
that is what the people need to believe.
They need to know that the alleged will have a defense council equivalently unbiased competent responsible
and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to ensure all available and pertinent evidence was collected
on their behalf to offer in defense.
Until sentence is pronounced one can not be proclaimed to be either innocent or guilty retaining the
presumption of innocence status and thus equality status with the wealthy before and under the law and is
entitled to equal protection and benefit of the law.
However in this scenario the wealthy person who could afford to pay for a lawyer is provided the services of
the Crown Attorney, the police and the entire legal system personnel free with out being required to leave
their home to file this or that as the entire system is their servant.
If the alleged person’s financial status is not below the “Threshold” that they determine to be the poverty
they will not be provided access to the services of Legal Aid and must finance their own defense and do all
the running around.
That is precisely 180 degrees adverse to the Constitution and every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights,
whereas every individual is guaranteed equal protection and benefits and the legal system must be
structured to provide the alleged the equivalent of the services provided the alleged victim.
That is to say there must be a Crown Prosecuting Attorney and a Crown Defense Attorney equivalently
capable, where assuredly both are human and thus inherently bias with a vested interest to win their case.
There must be an independent agency with absolute autonomy with persons of exemplary competence and
irreproachability with fortitude and conviction to the certainty that all pertinent evidence was presented
unbiased, for either the alleged victim or alleged perpetrator to file a legitimate complaint with.
The legal system deals with human lives here that exceeds far past just the alleged victim and alleged
perpetrator for not only are the relatives, friends, associates, employers ….whatever are affected, but every
individual and society as a whole are effected when incompetence is not seriously reprimanded and
deliberate incompetence is not punished as a criminal offense, being at the least criminal fraud purporting to
be acting on behalf of the Constitution and its people seriously compromising the safety and well being of
every individual and contrary to their Charter rights guaranteed in Perpetual Possessory Title since 1982 with
no limitations of time when reasonable evidence is provided that an injustice has occurred.
4
It is irrelevant whether or not evidence was discovered 20 years later it must be made known to the public
and justice must be served with exemplary attentiveness to deterrence.
The obvious fact is the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the provincial Attorney
General play both sides of the fence being both the advisor of the government departments, agencies and
the police that are financed by the taxpayer trusted to structure an efficient and effective legal system to the
certainty of justice prerequisite to the certainty of every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights.
That means consistency in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” to eradicate all inconsistencies with the
Constitution removing or clarifying any ambiguities or opportunity to interpret anything other than what is
meant by the supremacy of God overriding any erroneously or deliberately placed words that could be
erroneously mistaken, though impossible when “The Spirit of the Law” is consistently maintained.
Emphatically and unequivocally there must be a due process of law to ensure the hierarchy of the legal
system is unbiased, competent responsible and irreproachable coherent to the fact that we are all equal only
when the legal system is structured and enforced to the certainty that we are all equal that demand every
individual be consistently held equally responsible with consistent equal punishment.
Hardly can the people of the private sector be found guilty of breaching public trust while in government
office, criminally defrauding the people and eroding the sanctity of the Constitution that protects us all.
Hardly can an individual of the private sector be responsible to finance a venture against persons that refuse
to abide by “The Spirit of the Law” and hardly will the person that refuses to abide by “The Spirit of the Law”
be intimidated not to if all that is there to stop him or her is an individual that the administers and enforcers
of the law refuse to back.
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario government web site
clearly states that he is responsible as the “guardian of the public interest” and both the alleged victim and
alleged perpetrator are innocent until proven guilty by a legitimates competent responsible irreproachable
legal system with a due process of law to ensure the personnel are adept to structure and maintain such a
system ever attentive to remove inconsistencies with the Constitution that includes any obstructions to the
police in performance of their duty to collect all pertinent evidence to the certainty of determining the truth.
There must be an independent body for public complaints to ensure the police carry out their responsibilities
consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.
The police requiring warrants to search person or property when there is reasonable evidence to
do so is illegal obstructing justice as any individual in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” has
nothing to hide and must equally cooperate with the law to the certainty that justice is served
efficiently and effectively consistent with the Constitution that equally protects us all.
A person with something to hide whether it is relevant to the reasonable evidence that warranted
the search or not, simply absurd to obstruct the police in performance of their duty to bring all
criminals to justice to preserve the sanctity of the Constitution to the certainty we are all equally
protected.
Warrants obviously obstruct the police from taking fishing trips into the illegitimate legal system
personnel’s financial portfolios.
5
Absolutely every damn thing they do is structured to not only protect them, but provide them a
flourishing business on both sides of the fence to luxurious life style.
Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following
principles:
1. The need to ensure the safety and security of all persons and property in Ontario.
2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they serve.
4. The importance of respect for victims of crime and understanding of their needs.
Assuredly the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the Ontario Attorney
General have the responsibility as “guardians of the public interest” to ensure all personnel of the
government departments, agencies and police that they advise are unbiased competent
responsible and irreproachable consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights and certainly their mandates must be adept to do the job.
The fact that they refuse to deal with the innumerable inconsistencies with the Constitution
irrefutably prove they never intended to as does the existence of the private sector lawyers who
they direct me to, knowing dam well they adhere to the conspiracy themselves for luxurious gain
extorting exorbitant fees from the individual’s that can afford them with none of them likely to
bite the hand that stuffs them to luxury.
The “R & G of the AG” clearly states the Attorney General must administer the laws independent
of political or partisan influence, an absurdity certain being an elected representative himself
appointed by either the Prime Minister or the Premier of the province.
The admittance by various members of the Law Society stated or implied that their members are
not required to give a damn about every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights provides
irrefutable proof that they are not the unbiased competent responsible irreproachable people with
conviction and fortitude to administer and enforce the laws consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that they do not give a damn about.
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the Ontario Attorney General were
provided the evidence, but they nothing wrong with that as they do not give a damn about me
either, being no coincidence since that is the design and intent of the system to ransack the 80%
majority at will, creating the necessary poverty hopelessness and despair that breeds amoral
inclination advancing to criminal persuasion that provides them a surplus of victims so as to define
a “Threshold” to deal with only the victims they can profit from with insurance a wide open
industry with their members infesting it as they debate issues that should be locked up tight in a
controlled industry, but anything good for the public and society as a whole is adverse to their
illegitimate luxuries industry that ransacks us in every which possible with nobody to stop them
with their modus operandi thoroughly documented and the mere existence of the private sector
lawyer without any enforcement to hold them responsible as the Law Society has been irrefutably
been proven to be responsible for them with the Ontario Attorney General administering the Law
Society Act that condones them and the fact that they are not required to look at evidence when it
6
is against their members and the Attorney General is not accountable to reprimand by the Law
Society.
The RCMP Superintendent Robert Davis District Commander of the GTA didn’t feel it necessary to
look at the evidence as he admitted in the September 3 2008 RCMP Final Letter of Disposition”
that he states though I provided hundreds of pages of evidence November 8 2007 when I filed
with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing to investigate
government organized crime he felt he did not have to look at it as he attempted to slip out the
back door on unfounded evidence to find the RCMP innocent of refusing to investigate government
organized crime.
So what was Staff Sgt. R. B. MacAdam doing for the 8- 9 months with 10 days or so off to
celebrate his promotion to NCO Bob?
Was he attempting to do the same as Superintendent Robert Davis who attempted to find a way
out the back door, but admitted he ignored the evidence to find the RCMP innocent of refusing to
investigate government organized crime?
Assuredly he is bias, incompetent, irresponsible and reproachable, however consistent with the
conspiracy as they all must be for continued unpunished success.
Well as we near the end of their conspiracy we must find out why Staff Sergeant R.B MacAdam
got a promotion to NCO.
So Bob what are you gonna do?
Did you keep a copy of your report and will you turn it over to me to finish them off or will you go
down with the rest of them?
It is inevitable whether or not they down me first.
If you are the unbiased competent responsible and irreproachable person prerequisite of your
position you will cooperate with me or prove you are with their conspiracy.
If your report ignored the evidence as did the Superintendent’s you will take your place along side
him and the rest of the personnel that refuse to cooperate on behalf of the Constitution and every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
We are coming and this is your opportunity to distance yourself from the conspiracy.
I did tell you about Inspector Michael Fleming (Now retired) of the York Regional Police didn’t I?
He informs that he has no doubt that Don Wilson my former tenant and Director of Bio Safe
Natural Products Inc. was a conman after studying the evidence, but claims not according to law
when I retorted doesn’t make sense, to which he laughed saying he knows, but they learn early in
their careers that their laws have nothing to do with common sense.
I wonder if he will testify to that, but no matter the preponderance of evidence I collected in
pursuit of justice consistent with democracy, common sense, the Constitution and the Charter
irrefutably proves the entire system is staffed with raving lunatics trading in their common sense
for the opportunity to ransack their relatives, friends and neighbours
Oh ya, and the rule of Law
7
The Rule of Law (From the Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law
The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law.
Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority
is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in
accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process.
The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy.
According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly
include a clear separation of powers, legal certainty, the principle of legitimate expectation and
equality of all before the law.
The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has
become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use"
publicly disclosed laws

The R & R of the AG defines that most elusive concept – the rule of law- a well established legal
principle, but hard to easily define that protects every individual and society as a whole.
Obviously when the Law Society believes they can administer and enforce the laws consistent with
the Constitution conducive to every individual’s equal guaranteed Charter rights without giving a
damn about the Constitution and every individual’s rights and state evidence is irrelevant when it
is against their members we have a bit of a problem dontcha think?
Your side of the story is requested please.
You are unbiased, competent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the safety
and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed equally in the provisions of the Charter with
absolutely nothing to hide, Eh Bob.
Good then we will hear from you shortly
Thanks Bob
You will let us know if they bully you Eh?
8
What do they do … an offer you cannot refuse … nobody to help you Bob?
Once in you can never get out
October 17 2009
LIFE: The simplicity that isn’t
“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life”
Sanity belongs to everyone as does the reality we inhabit and share
The Labour of Love … the Ultimate Oxymoron
He is not heavy … he is my brother
Natural Humanism
Sanity
“Why should an individual work the majority of his or her life when unequivocally we all would rather progress
to the ultimate enjoyment without working a day in our LIFE?
Not a probability of undesired labour and unfairly paid efforts that escalate to personal realities of hopelessness
and despair where amoral inclination breeds advancing to criminal persuasion that invariably compromises the
ultimate potential of every individual and society as a whole that begs the question “Truth or Consequences”, as
words of denial deliberately placed “True as Reality Itself” are the Consequences we all pay by accepting the
denials and thus persistently in denial for ulterior purpose incited by the inherent bias nature of every individual
that make up the “Reality that is Humankind”
It is the consistency of denials reared coincidental to ones inherent bias nature amassed and attached to PIG
(Personal Interest Groups) with the humongous majority acquiesced to naivety believing that with words they
can convince other human beings similarly afflicted that they are unbiased, a much preferred status of the
environment where integrity is most respected and scrutinized by a populous of obtrusively habitual liars as the
insanity of reality as a whole adamantly attests.
Reality is that which every individual is born to with innocent empty mind enslaved to his or her necessities to
sustain life tended to by parents or guardians rearing us to be independent adults prepared to provide the
necessities of life for ourselves and through the natural progression of thought and reason we endeavour to
advance our quality of life coincidental and coherent to our interests acquiescing to PIG with our ultimate
potential in the realm of the unknown humongously compromised by our dedicated reluctance to eradicate our
inherent bias where progression of an interest can be humongously detrimental to that of another “PIG”
It is the power and advantage of many people working together to a common purpose with sense in common that
a building can be erected by the forces of many trades, each specialist in pertinent knowledge gained since time
began passed on from generation to generation to the ultimate accomplishment of present time.
When erected to be filled by human beings … invariably consumers will fill it with their necessities such as
food, furniture and paperclips providing a multitude of industries addressing the needs of humankind as all
things human are most emphatically and unequivocally the most ingenious “Wonder of the World”
humongously dwarfing the 7 of common renown as upon their existence simultaneously is the existence of their
needs, and their purpose ever attentive to the progressive nature of thought and reason for progressive
advancement upon quality of life with every individual playing a major role as consumer as equal entities of
unique happenstance with the enormity of their needs as a whole comes opportunity available to the whole to
provide fairly for each other ever attentive to efficiency and effectiveness to deal with human necessities and
their progressive advancement to a quality of life indicative of their adeptness to provide a user friendly data
base of knowledge collected over time freely available for all to use to the ultimate benefit of the whole.
It is due all the happenstances of realities beneficial or otherwise, enjoyed or suffered that all knowledge used to
expand on is the possession of all people of present existence unequivocally paid for endured through the
realities of existence since the beginning of time and subsequently passes on freely available for the ultimate
benefit of all participants of “Humankind”, thus the legitimate purpose of all knowledge and all persons using it
whereas an individual may never hold another individual hostage to their needs having accumulated the
knowledge to provide materials coincidental to their needs of which material would be inane without the
9
existence of individual’s nor would the necessary knowledge have been collected without the existence of the
innumerable individual’s, each an integral part of the reality that provided the producer of a product the
opportunity to
“Choose a job you love, and you will never have to work a day in your life”
Assuredly reality continues without the continuance of any one individual whereas “The Existence of
Humankind” is dependent on a compatible environment, their needs, inherent bias nature, the
progressive nature of thought and reason, the observance of all of realities that can be documented
under the natural phenomenon of Trial and Error” ever attentive to progressive advancement of
Humankind where ultimately each individual is an integral part thus the “Cause and Effect” of all
realities associated with “The Existence of Humankind” the Reality of the Whole.
Priority One of all things relative to humankind is every individual’s particular attentiveness to
provide for themselves, being their responsibility to be competent and irreproachable to the task
coincidental to that which is required and expected of them upon being awarded a job on the
presumption and the acceptance of it acknowledged upon receipt of financial gain that invariably melds
ones “Priority One” to provide for themselves to the career chosen to the accomplishment, a union of
necessity, an agreement of the minds that assuredly is and must be accepted by all individuals as a
natural thus forming the foundation of common sense of which to build on as a High Rise Building into
the Skies with no limitations except for our most limited selves as reality attests.
It is due our negligence, deliberate abandonment or refusal to hold true what is and our overpowering
bias that begins the process that could be represented at birth of humankind at the beginning of time by
a single line, the base of a rectangle destined to rise with every individual sharing of information to the
benefit of conclusion of the whole roofed by common sense “The Spirit of the Law” .
It is due the epitome of simplicity and sanity of “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” deduced of sane
thought and reason that has forever blown in the wind within the grasp of quadriplegics easily seen by
the blind well understood by us at 5 prior to the first day of school that gives credence to that which is
least apt to be mistaken by humankind, a natural of human beings, entities of equal ingredients well
aware of what is and what is not receptive of a fellow human entity.
It is history well documented as is the history of government personnel documented by themselves that
Confucius observed and brought to our attention, yet history asserts that
You can lead a horse to water, but cannot make it drink

Most likely because it knows the water is contaminated.
“You can lead a human to knowledge, but you cannot make it think” most likely because it
hasn’t the sense not to shit in the water it drinks.
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY … finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
It is by their words that we know that they know what is right being what we need to hear from them
consistent with “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” derived of sane thought and reason for we know their
words to be the truth as to what must be in the reality of Humanism and in Canada “The Spirit of the
Golden Rule” was enacted into the supreme law of Canada in 1982, the Constitution that governs us all
that demands the Constitution: Establishment personnel to consistently administer and enforcer it as we
are all presumed to be of the status of the presumption of innocence in absence of evidence to suggest
otherwise.
10
As with the presumption that demands consistency the Constitution: Establishment hierarchy must be
most emphatically and unequivocally the incarnate of “The Spirit of the Golden Rule” that is “The
Spirit of the Law” that is the Constitution: 1982 Document and therefore must be possessed of the
prerequisite traits, competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the
structuring of a legal system adept to their mandate with appropriate checks and balances to assure
every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits are equally
supported.
The collective minds of an average class of 5 years olds could invariably conclude in their first week of
sitting that a bully, obviously conspicuous by his or her actions cannot be assigned the task to
determine if he or she is a bully and subsequently pronounce appropriate sentencing or could a jury of
his or her peers, perhaps 12 equivalent bullies be assigned the task without predictable results with the
ongoing chaotic nature of the thing inevitable to expand beyond all comprehension of sanity, yet the
Law Society propagates that have infested the people’s political/legal arena infested and invested the
corporate world to progressively enhance and advance the quality of life of their Society membership
along with that of their affluent and influential friends that persist to ransack the majority in every
which way possible to the excruciating detriment to society as a whole is indicative of their powers as
charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration.
It is the reality that has allowed them to tap out the financial system to the crisis that commenced a
couple of years ago as they simply pass the debt to the people, the recipients of all their consequences
as they take the liberty to borrow on the majority individual’s credit and future to replenish the kitty so
once again they can suck the economy dry and place the loot in secured numbered accounts
It is the reality that allows me to state without hesitation that the Law Society ASSHOLES have so
humongously reduced the collective minds of the majority to that of a single toad by the time we are
adults that had peaked at 5 when we knew the taming of the bully was in our best interests, but now as
working adults only concerned that as individual’s are not contributing more than their fair share to
their personal ransacking.
All of reality provides the insurmountable evidence that the Charter Democracy Force has published a
prodigious amount on their web sites excerpts extracted from the insane reality we all exist that need
only be seen by persons of sound moral mind, yet most unlikely, due the insane world we all exist, that
there are sufficient numbers of such people with the necessary adeptness to convert the insane to a
mind to read it to coherency.
“It is only the wisest and the stupidest that cannot change”
It is reality that attests and begs the question

“Who the hell else is there”
The wisest of the insane society denoted by their wealth and power to acquire more are most reluctant
to give up what they have and serve the time in punishment for how they acquired it
So what hope do I have to convert society to that expressly defined by law by the mere publication of a
proliferation of irrefutable evidence intended to permeate the collective minds of the majority
unequivocally dwarfed by a single toad in such relative and pertinent matters of law.
Addendum to that with the progressive nature of thought and reason I must add, “Assuredly I must be
insane” concurring with many from both the Upper and Lower tiers for obviously completely adverse
purpose.
11
They of illegitimate power and wealth with the media on their side have the voice that belongs to the
people never to give it back, an improbability of an entity never had, though by law defined in the
“Spirit of Democracy” where the majority are intended to determine the government personnel to
represent us all in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” as defined in the 1982 Constitution that governs
us all equally as it equally protects and benefits us all, in no way is the majority entitled to determine
the manner in which the law is administered and enforced whereas there simply cannot be any such
thing as a minority discriminated in any way shape or form that would severely compromise their
Perpetual Possessory Title of “EQUALLY GUARANTEED CHARTER RIGHTS”
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no
force or effect.
Where inconsistencies are revealed it is imperative that they be immediately eradicated, not covered up,
to the certainty that no individual will suffer to deliberately incompetent negligent court personnel
being no other way to define such people due the simplicity and sanity of “The Spirit of the Law”
It is due the consistency “The Spirit of the Law” must be maintained that “The Letter of the Law”
defines particular issues, but never the less the word of humankind has no value unless every effort is
set in place to ensure they are kept being the precise purpose consistency to due punishment must be
administered and enforced and why that responsibility is attached to the office of the Attorney General
clearly stated in the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web
site.
He has been assigned innumerable responsibilities most significant and pertinent to his ultimate
responsibility in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” as “guardian of the public interest” that has been
already defined in “The Spirit of the Law” that demands the properties of democracy as defined and
commonly published be stringently enforced.

It is his incomprehensible readily apparent lone authority independent of political or partisan influence,
his responsibility to the certainty of democracy and every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter
rights that I provided him the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence that the personnel of the
innumerable government departments, agencies and police were obtrusively incompetent to administer
and enforce Ontario laws consistent with the Constitution conducive to the exemplary support of every
individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights, knowing all along that he was responsible for the
actions of the deliberately incompetent irresponsible and humongously reproachable Ontario Rental
Housing Tribunal, Investigations and Enforcement Unit of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and
Housing, the incomprehensible former Minister John Gerettsen, my MPP Julia Munro, Premier Dalton
McGuinty, the entire Legislature, York Regional Police, OPP and the Law Society of Upper Canada
which he has precedence second to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada that advises
the Minister of Public Safety presently my MP Peter Van Loan that is responsible to the people and
Parliament for the actions of the RCMP and ultimately they have all been informed as well as
Parliament via Prime Minister Stephen Harper prior to his coming into power and after causing him to
12
enact the 2006 Accountability Act, suggesting that none of them were ever responsible to put a system
in place adept to the support of the sanctity of the Constitution that within the provisions of the Charter
guarantees every individual equal protection and benefits.
It is the obviousness of their charlatan ways deliberately attentive to deception, prevarication,

manipulation and orchestration of illegitimate laws 180 degrees adverse to every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights necessitating there persistent façade as a legitimate government to cover up
the obvious fact that they are “Criminal Frauds” that display a semblance to democracy in the Upper
Tier so as to provide them all a fair opportunity to assure the loot ransacked from the people of the
Lower Tier is fairly distributed where there is indeed “Honour Among Thieves”
Throughout my writings it is prudent to know the meaning of the following published words
Principles: main beliefs, values, philosophy, ideology, morality, ethics, doctrine, principle
Supremacy: pre-eminence, ascendancy, primacy, superiority, domination, incomparability, dominance
Charter: contract, licence, deed, agreement, bond, hire, rent, employ
Spirit: strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, Force, fortitude
Justice: fairness, impartiality, righteousness, even- handedness, fair dealing, honesty, integrity
Consistency: constancy, steadiness, reliability, uniformity, evenness, stability, regularity
Sanity: Good sense, wisdom, reason, understanding, common sense, sense, judgement.
Honourable: Admirable, worthy, praiseworthy, moral, principled, good, respectable, upright
Freedom: Liberty, autonomy, lack of restrictions, self determination, independence, choice, free will,
sovereignty.
Simplicity: Ease, straightforwardness, effortless, plainness, minimalism, unfussiness, cleanness
It is imperative and emphatically unequivocally prerequisite that the legal system personnel have
autonomy absolutely independent of any influence by any person or persons being stringently governed
by the Constitution conducive to every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights that demands
consistency in continuity to be administered and enforced by competent, responsible irreproachable
personnel with fortitude and conviction to the certainty of the sanctity of the Constitution and its people
as equally guaranteed in Perpetual Possessory Title since 1982 not subject to any limitations of time
as the nefarious bent would have us believe embedded in their modus operandi when caught with
public pressure put on them they simply enact illegitimate laws intended to smooth over their Criminal
Actions while attempting to protect themselves from the punishment due them inserting words limiting
complaints to those that occur after their fraudulent enactments that they never intend to enforce, with
the Accountability Act, 2006 a prime example superseding their most humongous Criminally
Fraudulent Act, the Constitution that includes the provisions of every individual’s equally guaranteed
Charter rights that they never intended to keep with the Accountability Act, 2006 indicative of the
glaringly obvious.
SIMPLICITY
Due the innumerable happenstance of the innumerable realities that Reality as a whole contains I offer
this simple test so as not to further exasperate the heavily exasperated minds of the majority populace.
13
If we exist in a democracy governed by the Constitution that proclaims equality in the provisions of the
Charter where the people are allowed to vote for the people they would prefer to have represent them
determined by the majority vote where all persons are and must be presumed to be of the status of the
presumption of innocence in absence of reasonable evidence to suggest otherwise and all laws must be
consistently administered and enforced consistent with the Constitution that equally protects every
individual that competent responsible and irreproachable persons are prerequisite thus in, of and with
“The Spirit of the Law” whereas it is imperative that every individual be coherent to the laws with
every reason for the people to be informed as to the truth of evidence submitted to the authorities as
well as their decision, ultimately nothing to hide if in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” so there
SIMPLY should be no reason in hell for the Information Commissioner of Canada and the Ontario
personnel involved with the Freedom of Information Act not to consult with each other for the express
purpose to determine who is responsible to provide the evidence that I requested.
RIGHT?
We who will see shall see, being no miracle chanced upon the visually impaired.
I should make note that the Ontario Freedom of Information Act is severely impaired under the
guidance of the chief conspirators “Ministry of the Attorney General” as all of reality and the
extractions of excerpts relative to my personal encounters with the nefarious bent of the Law Society
propagates that the Attorney General heads attests as is the predictably that the evidence against him
will not be freely forthcoming under the Freedom of Information Act.
Just as assuredly the Information Commissioner of Canada mandated under the authority of the federal
government will be not forthcoming with the evidence that ultimately proves the entire federal
government and the illegitimate legal system administered by the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada and enforced by RCMP Commissioner that Brian Mulroney absconded from the
people mandating the position as Deputy Minister replacing Zack the former RCMP Commissioner that
publicly informed the people in September 2000 that the government was being taken over by
organized crime.
Poor Zack was not aware that the government had been taken over by organized crime in 1797 when
the Attorney General on behalf of the Upper Canada (Now Ontario) government met with a few of the
self proclaimed elite gentlemen to proclaim themselves a monopoly to propagate “Learned and
Honourable” gentlemen to administer the laws of Ontario that ultimately must be consistent with
democracy, which there simply is no evidence to support their claim to be the legitimate authority.
All of reality stands to attest against them awaiting the majority to overcome the serious affliction cast
upon them that will not allow them to perceive who it is that burdens them with a multitude of
hardships when it is only the Attorney Generals published as the powers that be, however puppets of
the Criminally Fraudulent governments that present themselves as representatives of the people, though
there are no pictures of them with their hands in the people’s pockets they most assuredly are there as
certain as the epitome of simplicity and sanity of “The Spirit of the Law” that is “The Spirit of the
Golden Rule” has forever blown in the wind seemingly just as invisible and invincible to the people
they proclaim there is no “2 Tier” system that begs the question “To whom do they of lofty tower
proclaim”
14
For them who require the SIMPLICITY more SIMPLY defined I offer that the evidence requested would be
forthcoming if the government is not organized crime personified and the SIMPLE fact is either way, evidence
forthcoming or not will prove them to be precisely the Organized Criminal Frauds all of reality attests.
They are provided only two options; either put their actions where their mouths are where our money is and
provide the requested evidence proving they have nothing to hide that would unequivocally prove they should
have hid it, but are obviously “The epitome of incomprehensible imbeciles”
Or should they not provide the evidence as expected of a legitimate system with nothing to hide they will most
certainly remove the cloak they once hid behind.
We are proud as hell at Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. to present the irrefutable evidence on behalf of the
Constitution and its people in assertion of every individual’s equally guaranteed Charter rights on the edge of the
opening of 1 LIFE being under construction by professional web developers initiating the ultimate security
warranted of the incalculatable value of the 2010 Membership Certificates that will be available to purchase for
$20 from moment of opening to December 31 2009 when the “Suing Machine” that is 1 LIFE www.1life.cC
commences action to retrieve all the money for the people the Law Society propagates and their affluent and
influential friends ransacked from them.
Not a bad investment I would have to admit and I doubt that I can explain it any SIMPLER than that to the
masses, for innumerable reasons of innumerable happenstance none more unambiguously clear than the
necessity of money to sooth the inherent bias beast.
Any day now, though Monday or Tuesday are highly suspect to commence the
“2o bucks says we can have a True Democracy” 1 LIFE initiative.
Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. will use the intake to simultaneously advertise 1 LIFE’s existence, the
non-debatable evidence of the government organized crime that will inevitably expose them for what they are
invariably inciting the majority to join with us and the minority to publicly support the most “Learned and
Dishonourable” as they always have proclaimed them Honourable providing them every opportunity to fair share
when divvying up the loot ransacked from the majority, thereby clearly exposing themselves for consumption of
the “Suing Machine” that gains power with every person that openly declares their insatiable appetite certain to
be the bite that bit them in this democracy where the people are coherent to the powers bestowed upon the
majority when assembled and organized in “The Spirit of the Law” that governs and protects us all even from
the most ornery critters of the once invincible charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and
orchestration that have blazed innumerable indelible trails that provides them no escape from the looming fires.
If I were one of them I would immediately revert to “The Spirit of the Law” and hope like hell I will blend with
the smoke and dissipate rather than mix with the ashes.
Pages 9 and 10 were sent by registered mail and their acknowledgement of receipt will be published on the day
of the more than Grand Opening of 1 LIFE destined to sell innumerable I LIFE’s to both the deserving and the
incomprehensible that cannot resist any opportunity to satiate their insatiable lust for wealth and the power that
once came with it, however powerless when inevitable legitimate competent responsible irreproachable
government/legal system personnel rise from the ashes destined to perpetual fear of due punishment consistently
administered to the most deserving that would dare mess with the Perpetual Possessory Title of an individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights granted on the presumption one is of the status of the presumption of innocence in the
absence of reasonable evidence to suggest otherwise.
15
One SIMPLY can never over or under estimate the “Power of 20 Bucks” when equality is the name of
the reality, once thought to be a game akin to “Monopoly” of the over now under being consistently
served their comeuppance for crimes committed since the enactment of the 1982 Constitution.
Credos to the Astute Minority of the Moral Majority
Yes …certainly you are right, reality is the best place to observe and collect evidence when wanting to
prove a thing
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13093424/Osgoode-Hall-Behind-It-All
The Attorney General representing the Upper Canada (Now Ontario) government and a few elite met in
1797 to proclaim them selves a monopoly to propagate “Learned and Honourable” persons to
administer the laws of Ontario.
In a democracy the government personnel are elected by the people and presumed to represent them in
providing the necessities of a moral democratic society to the benefit of the populace where every
individual is considered equal and the government is responsible to ensure that every individual is
fairly treated equally protected and benefitted as it is the people that finance them to do so, whereas it is
clearly stated the Law Society must provide society competent responsible and irreproachable persons
to administer laws consistent with democracy.
With the enactment of the Constitution Act: 1982: Document the federal and provincial governments
guaranteed every individual’s equal democratic rights in the provisions of the Charter and the Ontario
Attorney General has the responsibility as the government chief legal advisor to advise the government
personnel consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
As “guardian of the public interest” it is his responsibility to structure a legal system consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and it is his personal
responsibility to ensure that every individual is equally protected by the Constitution: Establishment
with the entire system financed by the taxpayer being the only way to equally protect every individual
as they guaranteed.
The fact is if the legal system was set up legally with competent responsible irreproachable personnel
they would be protecting every individual as guaranteed with minimum administrative and enforcement
staff.
It is obvious they have used the taxpayers money to set up a private industry of purported to be legal
professionals that humongously profits by not protecting every individual equally as guaranteed and in
fact have a delineator they refer to as the “Threshold” based on financial matters whereas evidence
16
against the members of the Law Society and their affluent and influential friends is irrelevant, because
obviously if you were in the profession of organized crime and controlled the legal system it would be
the height of absurdity to put to words a due process of law to eradicate them and separate themselves
from the luxurious lifestyle they had put so much effort to tangle their web of deceit founded on the
profession as charlatans of deception, prevarication, manipulation and orchestration.
The private sector lawyer has no legal right to extort money from the public in an attempt to assert an
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights that are guaranteed in Perpetual Possessory Title as the majority
of a moral democratic society will assert if they had a moral democratic legal government.
The Law Society is simply the Ultimate PIG (Personal Interest Group) using the taxpayers money to
structure the system to their interests which is to ransack the people of the Lower Tier to just above
poverty aiding and abetting the corporate world that they have infested and invested to luxury.
The private sector thrives off the woes of society created by their members that infested the political
and legal system by deliberate negligence of their responsibility to protect us as guaranteed, “Learned
and Honourable” to their conspiracy, profiting by allowing and setting up individual’s to be victimized
by refusing to consistently punish attentive to deterrence..
17
34 Riverglen Drive
Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc. Keswick, Ontario
October 15 2009 L4P 2P8
T/F: 905-476-8959
The Information Commissioner of Canada www.cdfji.ca
1@cdfji.ca
Place de Ville, Tower B
112 Kent Street, 7th Floor

Dear Information Commissioner
Ottawa, Ontario Frank Gallagher
On November 8 2007 I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP for refusing to
Director/Operations
investigate the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy: Evidence published on Charter
K1A 1H3
Democracy Force web site and affiliate sites referenced thereon.
Re: Evidence
On July RCMP
28 2008 refusal
the RCMP to investigate
informed that Staffgovernment organized
Sgt. R.B. MacAdam hadcrime.
completed the investigation after
Commission for Public Complaints finds
near 9 months study of the evidence I provided. them innocent when unequivocally guilty
Evidence Published www.charterdemocracyforce.ca
On September 3 2008 RCMP Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander of the GTA signed the
RCMP Final Letter of Disposition stating that though I had provided hundreds of pages of documents he
chose to ignore them in an attempt to slip out the back door on unfounded statements finding the RCMP
innocent of refusing to investigate the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy while
signing the “Letter” admitting he refused to study the evidence.
(See pages 17 and 18)
I hereby make request you take the appropriate action to provide me with a copy of now RCMP NCO Staff
Sgt. R.B. MacAdam’s near nine months report of his study of the evidence of government organized crime
published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites.
After immediately attending to that please take appropriate action to ensure no government department,
agency or police with ever obstruct an individual from their right to obtain pertinent information consistent
with the certainty of their equally guaranteed Charter rights and inform me as to what action has been taken.
This document sent by registered mail is published on my Scribd site http://www.scribd.com/documents as

“Freedom of Information Request registered mail” with 170 pages attached for your study.
I have also filed the Access/Correction Request Form with the Ontario Government by registered mail (See
page 2)
Please consult with the Ontario Government Freedom of Information agency to avoid duplication of effort
and inform me as to who will be dealing with the issues requested.
Thank you
signed October 15 2009 18

Yes I
Frank Gallagher provided the credit card information
FG
I provided Credit Card Information
Jack Santos responded October 19 2009

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21419969/Ontario-Government- 19
Not-Responsible-to-Cover-Up-This-One
20
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:franklyone@hotmail.com]
Sent: September 25, 2008 3:15 PM
To: 'REVIEWS'
Subject: RE: Check: Correction
September 25 2008
Please make note of corrected date on page 4 of the Request Review of Complaint September 25 2008
document published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site
http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force
Excerpt from page 4 follows
False statements are underlined
Paragraphs
1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to
understand the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint,
the RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.
He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided
to Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is
irrefutable to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he
refused to take the evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that
I had been sending to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address and I could continue to send
evidence via the same method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint
with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we
met on October 7 2007, (Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007)
perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent
Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the
evidence and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul
had plenty of time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul
acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)
Please acknowledge
Frank Gallagher
21
From: REVIEWS [mailto:reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca]
To: franklyone@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: Check
This is to acknowledge receipt of your Request for a Review. You will be receiving a
letter shortly confirming your request.
Thank you.
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
Reviews & Investigations Unit
FAX #: 613-952-8045
TELEPHONE #: 1-800-267-6637
E-MAIL ADDRESS: reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

To: REVIEWS
Subject: Check
September 23 2008 Frank Gallagher

34 Riverglen Drive
Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Keswick, On.
L4P 2P8
Canada Post: Bag Service 1722
905-476-8959
Ottawa, Ontario frank@cdf.name
K1P 0B3
Fax-613-952-8045 Manager
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca Charter Democracy Force
www.cdf.name
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317
Re: Request Review of my Complaint

RCMP refuse to investigate
Government corruption and conspiracy
Dear Commission Representative
I have received the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 signed by
Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area and he informs if I wish to
exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by contacting the
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP at Canada Post: Bag Service 1722, Fax-613-
952-8045, and
www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca
22
I do wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint. I have had some
difficulties communicating with Andree Leduc, Enquiries and Complaints Analyst at the 7337 137
Street, Suite 102, Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4 office so I am submitting this Request for
Review of my Complaint by both Fax-613-952-8045 and your on line form at www.cpc.cpp.gc.ca.
Andree Leduc will get the whole document by e-mail along with the rest on the AAAAALIST
All pertinent evidence regarding this Request for Review of my Complaint is published or referenced
on the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-
disposition affiliate web site of the Charter Democracy Force
All evidence published on this site is pertinent including correspondence with Andree Leduc of your
Surrey, British Columbia Office.
The RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 implicates Inspector Robert Davis to be
in on the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and the details are explained in
document “Request Review of Complaint September 23 2008” published on the aforementioned web
site of which this is the first page.
The links to the evidence originally published on the sites referenced in my original complaint to your office
November 8 2007 were corrupted so I opened a new site CDF Documents and transferred pertinent evidence
there informing Staff Sergeant R.B.MacAdam and everyone else published on the AAAAALIST
of the original Charter Democracy Force web site http://groups.google.com/group/charter-democracy-force The
CDF Documents web site can be accessed from this site. .
It would be prudent to mention that I have been providing the irrefutable evidence of Government Organized
Crime of corruption and conspiracy to Sergeant Michael Thomson of the Milton RCMP office since January 18
2006 when he responded to the evidence I originally left with Inspector Peter Goulet of the Newmarket
detachment dated November 15 2005.
On January 3 2006 Inspector P. Goulet wrote to inform the evidence was originally reviewed by members of the
Federal Enforcement Section and it was learned I was concerned about possible offences under the Canada
Business Act.
The Act falls under the investigative mandate of the RCMP Commercial Crime Section also located in
Newmarket and was being forwarded on to them for review.
I had indeed originally requested the RCMP address the relative issues regarding my former tenant Don Wilson
president and director of Bio Safe under the Canada Business Corporations Act, Part XIX Paragraph 229 (1)
having already attempted to get the York Regional Police to deal with Don Wilson under the Criminal Code and
Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but they declined to do so.
By the time I went to the RCMP with the November 15 2005 cover letter and evidence I had already tried
several government departments to address the issues that occurred June 30 2005 at the ORHT but to no avail, so
that is the reason I presented the issues in different manner under the Canada Business Act to try my luck that
way.
This is all documented on the Golden Rule for Society …Gold for Law Society web site
http://groups.google.com/group/golden-rule-for-society---gold-for-law-society-
under the heading Royal Canadian Mounted Police Compiled A – C documents now available on the
“RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site along with other pertinent evidence.
You must remember I was just a victim experienced in another field of endeavour with no experience in how the
police carried on business at the time and simply provided the evidence that crimes had been committed by my
former tenant and president of a company that I had invested in and thought they would be dealt with by
23
professional people in these matters not realizing I had to dot (t) s and cross (i) s and follow procedures I was not
aware of or experienced in.
I was under the opinion at the time that the people financed all government personnel involved in the
administration and enforcement of the law to be proficient competent responsible and irreproachable with
fortitude and conviction to the safety and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Charter of equal
protection and benefits consistent with the Constitution and the Police Services Act.
My opinion has never wavered.
Police Services Act

R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15
PoliceServicesAct.doc
Declaration of principles
1. Police services shall be provided throughout Ontario in accordance with the following principles:
1. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of
2. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities they
serve.
It is all about common sense and the law, not aware at the time the absence of it throughout the
personnel of the system but with further thought and reason determined it was too consistent to be
incompetence and eventually proved it was deliberate organized crime of corruption and conspiracy by
members of the Law Societies beginning in the very first line of the Charter, all documented on the
web sites.
The Sergeant Michael Thomson e-mail dated January 18 2006 specifically states that I proposed an
investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices of the Canada Business Act and as such investigated
the evidence
This information is all published on my web sites that RCMP Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam
investigated and states in his interim report dated May 20 2008 that he felt he should be thorough and
thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence.
Since Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area does not comprehend
the need to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction for the safety
and wellbeing of every individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms nor is
he competent to command a police force consistent with the Police Services Act I will just address the
issues he stated in his September 3 2008 Final Letter of Disposition, which is self-evident
In such serious matters of government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy well documented
and filed with you on November 8 2007 and studied by Staff Sergeant Bob MacAdam in a manner he
felt was thorough and thoughtful when forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence as he
states in his interim report dated May 20 2008, and finally completed on July 11 2008 as stated in the
letter from the Professional Standards Unit signed by Sergeant Karen Delorey, after 8 months of
studying the prodigious amount of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime of corruption
and conspiracy published on my web sites that had been provided to Inspector Brian Verheul, Milton
detachment via e-mail addressed to Sergeant Michael Thomson since January 18 2006 it is
24
incomprehensible that the final 2 page report dated September 3 2008 by Superintendent Robert Davis
only contained a little more than one page of relative text, especially since he states Staff Sergeant R.B.
MacAdam was a veteran investigator.
It states in the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP pamphlet Andree Leduc mailed
me when confirming my complaint that if the CPC carries out a further investigation an investigator
will gather all the information relevant to the complaint and will conduct interviews with me, the
RCMP members(s) involved, and any witnesses.
The pertinent evidence is published on my Charter Democracy Force web sites aforementioned and the
report by Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is now pertinent evidence having spent 8 months studying the
evidence thorough and thoughtful and of course he is a pertinent witness to attest that the report the
RCMP present at the review is in fact the report that he prepared for the investigation of the complaint.
Superintendent Robert Davis is also a pertinent witness to attest that the final report he sent me after 1
¾ months reviewing Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report is indeed the report he prepared.
I ask that you immediately request a copy of Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report to ensure no
time is allowed for a fixed new replacement report.
A copy of Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is enclosed.
It is within your competence to determine if they are consistent with each other.
Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008
False statements are underlined

Paragraphs
1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

2) The investigator also reviewed numerous documents found on my web sites in order to
understand the circumstances surrounding my complaint
That is what he stated in his May 20 2008 interim report
3) He has reviewed Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s report and wishes to share with me the results.
4) He emphasizes that despite the hundreds of pages of documentation involved in my complaint,
the RCMP’s sole mandate was to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately.
He is suggesting there is a difference as to how the evidence is examined. The evidence provided
to Sergeant Michael Thomson up to October 18 2007 when I met with Roy Steinebach is
irrefutable to the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy even though he
refused to take the evidence I brought to him that date he said he had access to the evidence that
I had been sending to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address and I could continue to send
evidence via the same method, which I did and is all relevant up to the date I filed the complaint
with the commission November 8 2007. I presume he was instructed how to handle me before we
met on October 7 2007,
Correction: October 18 2007 not October 7 2007
perhaps a note on the file. As far as Inspector Brian Verheul is concerned Superintendent
Robert Davis states Inspector Verheul instructed Sergeant Thomson and to how to deal with the
evidence and is therefore responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions. Inspector Brian Verheul
had plenty of time to confirm whether or not the evidence was relative to the Government
25
Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy. It is yet to be determined if Inspector Verheul
acted on his own or… consulted with his superiors.)
It is superfluous to just stick with the complaint I filed November 8 2007 against Sergeant Roy
Steinebach and Inspector Brian Verheul. They have some splainin to do as does Superintendent
Robert Davis that will inevitably lead to their superiors.
I complained of Government corruption and conspiracy and they refused to investigate, and
when Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam investigated the evidence thorough and thoughtful when
forming conclusions based on the relevant evidence, in order to determine which was relevant he
had to be thorough and thoughtful as he stated he was.
That remains to be seen but Superintendent Robert Davis’s report is self- evident he is not.
I reiterate all police have a responsibility to be consistent with the Police Services Act and the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and
benefits and it is each person’s superior that is responsible to see that they are competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual as guaranteed
with particular attention to victims, attentive to any flaws in the system that should be addressed
to prevent such reoccurrences to some other individual.
Police Services Act

2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter
of
1. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities
they
serve.
Obviously Inspector Robert Davis has insulted my intelligence and demonstrated his
incompetence for success as either the bad or good guy.
You will see in many of my writings I presumed the RCMP Commissioner William Elliot had
been consulted and it was he who actually is behind the refusal to investigate along with
Minister of Public Safety and so on right up to the DOJ and higher.
5) Staff Sergeant MacAdam’s investigation revealed when I attended the Toronto North
Detachment on October 18 2007 and met with Sergeant Steinbach, it was not to make a new
complaint but rather to provide more documents with respect to the same complaint I had
previously made to the Commercial Crime Section (CCS). I was advised in 2006 that CCS
would not be investigating this complaint and I was provided with the rationale for that decision
being informed the Department of Justice had been consulted prior to responding to me.
26
As previously stated only the first file I provided to Inspector Peter Goulet dated November 15
2005 made reference to the Canada Business Act issues that Sergeant Michael Thomson
addressed in his report on January 18 2006.
From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of

corruption and conspiracy and the refusal of the YRP, OPP, RCMP and
many government departments and agencies to deal with the issues
which led to the Ontario Attorney General who advises them all and he
is the “guardian of the public interest” which he refuses to guard.
5a) Sergeant Steinbach declined to take more documents and explained the CCS Intake process to
me.
I printed out the evidence to take down to him because the RCMP web site stated they do
not
take evidence by e-mail.
He refused to take the evidence stating he already had it because the evidence I had been
sending via Sergeant Michael Thomson’s e-mail address was being kept on file and he
already had a copy of the recording of the ORHT hearing that I provided with the
November
15 2005 evidence I gave toInspector Peter Goulet.
5b) He did however tell me that he felt that my complaint was too vague and over reaching
and that it did not meet the CCS Investigational mandate.
He refused to look at the evidence I brought with me and the evidence on the web sites is
not vague at all.
He did not state the evidence was vague and over reaching and the evidence irrefutably
proves his opinion as to the relevancy of Government Organized Crime of corruption and
conspiracy is valueless and I suspect that he is not all that familiar with the file and was
just acting on instructions.
5c). He also told me that there was already a file open regarding my allegations and went on to
explain that it did not necessarily mean that the RCMP was going to investigate the
complaint.
(Sergeant Steinbach told me for certain the RCMP was not going to investigate the
complaint)
6) Inspector Verheul did not deal with me directly, but he did provide direction to Sergeant
Thomson, my principle contact person, that if material being submitted continues to relate to
the
issues already reviewed then nothing further should be done than to place a copy of the
correspondence on the file.
As previously mentioned Inspector Verheul is responsible for Sergeant Thomson’s actions and when
I brought the matter to his attention prior to filing the complaint he should have looked into it and
he has had plenty of time since as he has been provided all the evidence the same as the rest of the
people whose e-mail addresses are in the AAAAAALIST document published on the original
Charter Democracy Force web site
27
7) In the course of his investigation Staff Sergeant MacAdam also determined that my initial
complaint involving my investment in Mr. Wilson’s company and the Ontario Rental Housing
and
Tenant’s Act dispute was reviewed and that I was advised in writing that the matter was most
appropriately handled through the civil provisions provided for in the noted statute and that no
criminal investigation would be undertaken
I presume reference is being made to Sergeant Michael Thomson’s January 18 2006 e-mail again.
He has to fill in the report somehow. Heaven knows I am not referring to reiterations being
particularly reiterative myself. I am noting the struggle to put something to paper that looks
legitimately convincing.
8) When I was not satisfied with that response I wrote back the same day and Sergeant Thomson
wrote his second letter dated February 7th 2006, further explaining that if I suspect criminal
activity, the police service with primary jurisdiction would be responsible for investigating the
allegations and it seems the Ontario Provincial Police had also reviewed my complaint and had
referred me to the York Regional Police as the police services of jurisdiction. It was established
as well that I had met with the YRP previously and was told that the matter was civil and that
they would not be conducting an investigation.
I do not seem to have a copy of that letter in my computer files, perhaps in my 3’ stack of hard copy
but it is irrelative.
The police sent me in circles as to who had the authority whereas the YRP was the original police
force of jurisdiction but they have persistently refused to look into the Government Organized Crime
of corruption and conspiracy, the same as the OPP and the RCMP whereas they all have been
provided the same evidence.
1) After careful consideration of the details surrounding my complaint, he finds no evidence that
indicates that Sergeant Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and furthermore he
supports Inspector Verheul’s directives, given the nature of the file and the documentation
being
provided.
There you have it, after careful consideration he finds no evidence that indicates that Sergeant
Steinebach or Inspector Verheul acted improperly and further more he supports Inspector Verheul’s
directives.
Was it he Superintendent Robert Davis, District Commander Greater Toronto Area that gave the
order not to investigate? Was it an obvious decision for him? Did he need to bother consulting with
his superiors?
That is yet to be determined!!
2) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by

contacting the CPU at the Ottawa office
Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!

That is what this all about. Right?
I see Inspector Brian Verheul is retired now (bottom of his 2nd page).
Before Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam finished the investigation he was provided a new job( See
his May 20 2008 interim report) with NCO i/c after his name as Occupational Health and Safety
Services “O” Division/ Return to Work/Medical Discharge Facilitator of Occupational Health
and Safety Services “O” Division
28
As predictable as the likelihood of people becoming victims with government members of the
Law Societies holding every position of authority in the legal system who are not required to give
a damn about every individuals guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and benefits nor is
the Law Society of Upper Canada required to examine evidence provided in support of
complaints against their members.
See the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document published on the original Charter
Democracy Force web site.
CanLaw National Lawyer Referral Service confirmed this on their web site www.canlaw.com
and I copied other evidence from their site, which they were not too happy about which you will
see published on the Charter Democracy Force web site.
All evidence referred herein is published on the Charter Democracy Force web sites and was e-
mailed to everyone on the aforementioned AAAAAALIST and they were provided with the web
site addresses they would be published on.
********************************************************************************
**
It is predictable you of the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP will be orchestrated
by the superiors of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy as it is apparent
they already caused Andree Leduc to not cooperate with me.
You will find that information on the “RCMP Final Letter of Disposition” web site or referenced where
you will find all the evidence stated herein, and quite probably more.
The evidence is irrefutable of the Government Organized Crime of corruption and conspiracy and with
the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008 they are securely implicated in the
conspiracy.
Now it is your turn to provide us the irrefutable evidence of the Commission for Public Complaints
Against the RCMP for the public to see which you really have no choice but to cooperate with the
conspiracy or cooperate consistent with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights.
Of course this document will be e-mailed to everyone on the AAAAALIST and many others.
I will expect acknowledgement of receipt of the first page of this document informing you where the
rest of it is published and the other pertinent evidence.
Should you have any problems with the links to the documents or web sites please do not hesitate to
contact me at frank@cdf.name
The same if you need any help understanding the evidence or should you require more evidence,
anything at all please do not hesitate to contact me.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
Charter Democracy Force
PS
You have more than enough to demand a Public Inquiry if you can find someone you can demand.
29
Perhaps you can find a way to get the information to the media.
You will read throughout the correspondence every government department and agency suggesting I
get a lawyer and deal with my personal issues, as they like to say, in civil court.
The July 26 2008 Saturday Star headlined the serious situation that the Middle Class cannot afford to
access the civil courts costing $60,000 for 3 days and the media who are on the AAAALIST have also
been provided the evidence of precisely what I informed them more than three years ago which they
attempt to orchestrate themselves out of this one.
Invariably everything they do is corrupt and they have no choice but to continue in their ways when
they are confronted but the jig is up.
There is always the option of finally doing things legal consistent with the Constitution conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
That would require restructuring and come right out and fess the truth something they are not familiar
with so it could be somewhat clumsy.
30
From : Michael Thomson <Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Sent : January 18, 2006 12:51:19 PM
To : <franklyone@hotmail.com>
CC : "Mona Eichmann" <Mona.Eichmann@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Subject : BioSafe Natural Products Inc./ Bio-Safe Natural TechnologiesInc.
Dear Mr. Gallagher:
I have reviewed the documents, forwarded to our office here, that were submitted to our
Newmarket Detachment. You have proposed an investigation be undertaken utilizing the auspices
of the Canada Business Corporations Act,Chapter C-44 (CBCA) and as such, this matter has been
taken by our office for review.
A review of the matter has been completed and the Department of Justice (DOJ) has been
consulted in terms of prosecution under the jurisdiction of this Act.
Unfortunately, Part XIX, and Section 229(1) CBCA and thereafter of the Act is quite specific
in the terms of the investigation and enforcement of same. This is entirely a civil procedure
that requires the Court to issue an Investigation Order and thereafter appoint an
Inspector. The Inspector has specific authorization allowing entry and examination of the
corporation's books and records. These duties are outlined in Section 130(1) CBCA. Part
XIX.1 outlines the apportioning of the award of damages, and Part XX outlines remedies,
offences and punishment.
Mr. Donald WILSON's assertions that a subpoena and/or a search warrant are required in order
to allow the shareholders to review the companies' books and records are erroneous, as
outlined in Section 21 (1-10) CBCA.
It is the judgment of DOJ and this office that this matter lies solely within the confines
of civil litigational procedures, and as such, DOJ will not consider prosecuting this matter
and no investigation will be undertaken by this office. An attempt has been made to verbally
convey this message via telephone, however the number provided appears to be the number of a
fax machine. The information provided will be kept on file for intelligence/ information
purposes only. If you have any further questions, these may be directed to the Writer at
the numbers listed below.
Yours truly,
M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

NCO i/c Central Intake & Admin. Support.
Greater Toronto Area - Commercial Crime Section,
Milton, Ontario
(905) 876-9656
(905) 876-9757 (Fax)
michael.thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Sent: September 18, 2008 8:21 AM
31
To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: FW: Request Review of Complaint
September 18, 2008

Andree Leduc
I have not yet received acknowledgement of receipt of the e-mail I sent September 11 2008.
Please respond as to what actions you have taken regarding these most serious issues.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Manager

To: 'complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca'
Subject: Request Review of Complaint
September 11 2008
Commission for Public Complaints Against The Royal Canadian Mounted Police
7337 137 Street, Suite 102
Surrey, British Columbia V3W 1A4
Fax 604-501-4095
complaints@cpc-cpp-gc.ca
Attention Andree Leduc

Enquiries and Complaints Analyst
Frank Gallagher
Re: File No. PC-2007-2316 Manager
Re: File No. PC-2007-2317 Charter Democracy Force
Re: Request Review of Complaint
Dear Andree Leduc
I hope you will be more cooperative than when you last wrote in December 2007 and refused to respond to my
several attempts to have you confirm that you will and make some effort to be competent when this inevitable
day arrived to request a review of my complaint against the RCMP as I am not satisfied with their deliberate
incompetence consistent with the government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.
Given the evidence and particular circumstances it would ne naïve of me to believe anything other than you are
under the thumb of the major players of the conspiracy but never the less I must go through the motions
following the modus operandi of the government documenting every step of the way for both present and future
use.
.You will notice how FFF, Forthright Forthcoming and Forthwith I endeavour to be expecting the same in return
and of course when not, it is painfully obvious and though I would prefer appropriate action from you I have
learned to settle for more evidence as if I didn’t have enough already.
From the tone of my writing it is hoped you will comprehend that what concerns me does concern you one way
or another and all I can do is hope that you understand that I am a victim requesting justice as detailed on the
Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name and 10 affiliate sites although in reference to the evidence
32
originally attached to the complaints you will find it on the original Charter Democracy Force site
There is sufficient evidence there that demands the RCMP look into in the 15 Lawyer Files and the Mad, Glad
mostly Sad….Why document that asks many questions Why that need to be formally answered even though they
answer themselves.
I have made note of some very significant serious problems within the upper command of the RCMP in the
following pages, which includes a copy of their Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008.
I believe considering your admittance of incompetence that this is a case of rare circumstance and at
the discretion of the Chair of the CPC request the CPC become involved and conduct its own
investigation in the public interest or conduct a public interest hearing or both.
Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
September 11 2008
33
Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC

Golden Rule
“Do not impose on others what you would not wish for yourself”
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words BENEVOLENCE,
RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY …finally I began to make out what was written between the lines; the whole volume
was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Jesus
“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
Jonathan Swainger
University of British Columbia history professor
Edmund Morgan’s compelling book “Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and
America” opens with an assertion that the success of any form of government requires the acceptance of a
number of fictions. In democracies for example, it is necessary for the population to “believe” that the people
have a voice or…that the representatives of the people are the people”
Frank 1942 AD – 200_
Manager, Charter Democracy Force
When truth of a CONSISTENCY to a thing is the ultimate quest, the thing is self-evident even though supported by only
one statement is self sufficient, impervious to any number of CONSISTENCIES of truths that do not maintain a
CONSISTENCY with the thing .
When all is said and done and such inconsistency remains adverse to the CONSISTENCY of the thing deception and
prevarication is self-evident.
When persons develop prevarication to perfection they invariably deceive themselves making them inane to any purpose
vulnerable to sane purpose of humongous advantage to the Charter Democracy
Force maintaining CONSISTENCY to a thing fair and relevant to all of the moral society of the Constitution of the
democracy of Canada where eradication of amoral inclination is its purpose.
34
CONSISTENCY to evade the purpose of truth
with irrelevant unfounded truths consistently
reveals the truth whether they are truths or lies
where Reality is the truth impervious to
perception yet precisely due to perception.
When ones mandate is to meet with a person

to pay them back $5 owed and finds them
lying in the street in pain a competent report
on the incident, no matter how thorough to
mandated purpose should include mention of
the victim, how he or she got there, and what
initiatives were taken to secure their safety
and wellbeing and was there any obvious
hazards that could be removed to ensure no
reoccurrence.
Due diligence to a purpose when the safety

and wellbeing of every individual is severely
jeopardized weighs heavy on the ability of an
authority assigned responsibility and the
report is self-evident
The painful obviousness of that which is predictable becomes pathetically more nauseating when proven true.
One charged with a crime can not be judged by the amoral and most definitely not by oneself.
35
36
Priority
Police Services Act

2. The importance of safeguarding the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms and the Human Rights Code.
3. The need for co-operation between the providers of police services and the communities
they serve.
In which way does a preponderance of paper proliferated with words protect every individual as
guaranteed by the Charter?
Of what purpose are such words and those found in the Constitution if staff is without principles?
Incompetence is a relatively simple matter to deal with when competence is the quest by all concerned
Deliberate incompetence is a simpler matter to deal with when incompetence is the quest by all
concerned
When there is an obvious CONSISTENCY of incompetence it could very well be the person who
perceives the CONSISTENCY of incompetence to be obvious is personally consistently incompetent.
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of
no force or effect.
Considering every individual’s safety and well being is at stake consistent CONSISTENCY of those
people assigned the responsibility to protect every individual equally as guaranteed is mandatory either
stated or implied.
Similarly and most assuredly government personnel financed to administer and enforce the provisions
of the Constitution must be competent responsible and irreproachable in continuity with fortitude and
conviction meaning they must be aware of their legitimate purpose and the serious ramifications upon
society should the CONSISTENCY not be consistently monitored and maintained.
The consequences of neglect are of the most serious nature to the public interest and most assuredly the
Attorney General of Ontario is the “guardian of the public interest” as the “Roles and Responsibilities
of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site attests.
37
CONSISTENCY is also prerequisite in the safety and wellbeing of personnel involved in the
government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy.
The evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force was collected by me Frank Gallagher who
became lucidly alert on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal hearing to the fact I had
been victimized by my former tenant DON Wilson president of a company I had invested in.
Over a period of three years I presented the irrefutable evidence of the crimes to a preponderance of
prominent government personnel, media and others whose e-mail addresses in the AAAAALIST
document are published on the original Charter Democracy Force web site
The CONSISTENCY of their do not give a damn attitude about the Constitution and the individual’s
equal guaranteed Charter rights indicative of the spirit that emanates from the Law Society of Upper
Canada demonstrated in the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document is overwhelming and
pathetically incomprehensible in terms of incompetence and ignorance to legitimate purpose.
So overwhelming that stretches far beyond the realm that such incompetence could be achieved
naturally and already certain there was much more to this than meets the eye turned my efforts to
divulge the root of the problem that led me right back to that which was immediately apparent at the
beginning that the office of the Attorney General of Ontario was behind it all, being advisor to the
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing John Gerretsen who was responsible to monitor compliance
with the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 but demonstrated an irresponsible indifference to his
responsibility.
This is all detailed in the 15 Lawyer Files, which we are all quite familiar with by now. Right?
Well to save me time and everyone else concerned the evidence published on the Charter Democracy
Force irrefutably proves the incompetence of the entire legal system to protect every individual equally
as guaranteed by the Charter but at the same time demonstrates an uncanny CONSISTENCY to protect
every individual involved in the conspiracy from the people adverse to the moral legitimate purpose
that they have the people “believe”
So CONSISTENT and so obvious that any sane person of moral thought and reason can discern the
truth that what we have here in Canada is government organized crime personified.
The RCMP who studied the evidence since I filed with the Commission for Public Complaints against
the RCMP November 8 2007 not November 7 2007 as suggested in their “Final Letter of Disposition
had to wade through the evidence which was apparently either over their heads or was simply of no
concern to them as they did their Law Society rendition of pathetic injustice oblivious to “The Spirit of
the Law” and the vital role evidence plays.
Well, the RCMP had an opportunity to show their stuff and blew it miserably incompetent to the
conspiracy and most assuredly no semblance at all to what is expected of a competent responsible
irreproachable entity of fortitude and conviction in continuity to support a moral society conducive to
every individual’s guaranteed equal Charter rights.
Such lame excuses to avoid addressing the major issues and even in what amounts to a one full page of
response maintains an inconsistency with actual fact, but then competence to any purpose is not
expected of them from their superiors so what you see is what you get and the public has no choice but
to forget it and move on to retain their sanity.
38
Perhaps all the inconsistencies are deliberately entered to draw ones attention to them and would be of
no avail to argue, petty in nature distracting from the obvious serious issues they obviously never
intend to address.
Perhaps they are intended to infuriate me so I will respond insanely providing them opportunity to
divert the issues to a mental instability.
Well, that does not work absolutely inane to competent responsible irreproachable sane moral purpose.
Reality is the truth impervious to perception yet precisely due to perception
The truth cannot change but perceptions are vulnerable and fickle things.
They will allow you to believe you are cunning intelligent above many, provide you confidence and
arrogance…and stuff like that.
Simple fact is it will betray you.
Do not believe?
Have a serious look at the Final Letter of Disposition from the point of view of an individual of the
moral
majority who once believed their Charter rights secure and were treated fairly as if in a democracy.
The government organized crime has clearly been proven to be initiated at the top but its success is
dependent on the ignorance and cooperation of the ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE.
As the economy gets worse nature will take its course has history attests and be assured we of the
Charter Democracy Force will humongously increase our efforts to the resolve necessary to prevention
of the predictable unnecessary chaos.
One has to wonder if terrorists is just a word attached to groups who are well aware that sane peaceful
initiatives to fair sane moral purpose of sane moral thought and reason is impossible with greedy
imbeciles devoid of conscience inept to sane moral thought and reason.
It seems to me the manipulative abilities of international corporate conglomerates and the humongous
advantage the affluent and influential have illegitimately over the people of the Lower Tiers the World
Trade Center was a likely target when the people are driven insane by the insanity of it all left
unchecked.
Anyway, the people have a right to know what is published on the Charter Democracy Force web site
and with phase one now complete with the irrefutable evidence the upper echelon of the RCMP are
involved we can now direct our efforts full time to spreading the truth and we thank you for that for
making it so vividly clear.
This document “ReceivedSeptember102008” will be published in its appropriate place on the “RCMP
Final Letter of Disposition” web site http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
I need not mention how severely disappointed we are at but nothing we had not expected and certainly
nothing we were not prepared for.
39
We will give the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP one more opportunity to
demonstrate their incompetence to serve the people consistent with the Constitution and of course make
a formal request to the RCMP Commissioner to investigate the government organized crime as
evidenced on the Charter Democracy Force web site www.cdf.name which Robert Davis,
Superintendent, District Commander, Greater Toronto Area was kind enough to admit as did Staff
Sergeant R.B. MacAdam that you have possession of the evidence or access of all the evidence on the
web sites but have chosen to ignore it with blinders on and chose to emphasize your sole mandate was
to determine whether or not the members acted appropriately
This is how my first conversation with Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam began when he phoned me to see
if I would come down to the Newmarket office to discuss the complaint and now 10 months later the
incompetence remains..
It was about 3 weeks after he began looking into it on a part time basis he informed and at first I agreed
to go down, but when I asked if he had looked at the evidence on the web site he said no, he was just
investing the complaint against the RCMP members.
He had not yet talked to the 2 RCMP members and not looked at the evidence and he wants me to
come down.
I questioned how could he possibly determine if they acted appropriately with out looking at the
evidence and of course the Law Society of Upper Canada is of the belief their member acted
appropriately without looking at the evidence and we see a significant CONSISTENCY throughout that
evidence appears to be irrelevant when members of the Law Societies are involved as the Attorney
General who plays a major role advising all government departments and agencies.
I told him he would first have to determine if the evidence was valid to the complaint or considered
trivial, frivolous or vexatious which I cited from the Complaints Commission brochure.
You state Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam is a veteran investigator which hardly supports your intended
purpose when logically in the peoples minds evidence plays a major role in investigations and if your
veteran investigators are not aware the public are in serious trouble.
OOPS: They are in serious trouble aren’t they?
All that has been noted is the pathetic incompetence of the person assigned to the investigation and for
that he gets a promotion and I can expand that to see how you made it to District Commander.
There can be no doubt you are aware of the conspiracy because you would have to be an imbecile not
to understand what is going on if you are familiar with the evidence.
Of course that has crossed my mind in earlier writings that for the government organized crime to be
successful persons in you positions have to be selected from the incompetent or cooperative to the
conspiracy permitting its persistent existence.
You have made reference to issues being discussed with the DOJ, which is absurd as the evidence
clearly shows the DOJ and the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada are major players in
the conspiracy.
I know it appears that I am addressing these issues to you in an effort to make you people understand
the error of your ways but we know you are well aware, however it is imperative the public clearly
understands and it is to that endeavour I am most attentive.
40
I presume your efforts are addressed similarly and I have to inform you the intended recipients of this
information are hardly as dumb as they would have to be to comprehend any reason for you not to act
on their behalf consistent with the Constitution.
Meanwhile I am requesting every recipient to jump in and act appropriately on behalf of the people in
legitimate support of the sanctity of the Canadian Constitution.
The inane dribble you offered as a competent responsible irreproachable response may well be what
you believe but as always evidence begets the truth and you people simply must familiarize yourselves
with the concept.
You state Sergeant Steinbach told me what my complaint was too vague which is utter nonsense but I
know after 10 months study of the evidence that is so overwhelming with nothing left to debate and out
of hundreds of pages of evidence you had to at least fill one page with something and why not utter
crap that comes so readily.
Given the most serious nature of the issues it is incomprehensible to suggest every (i) should be dotted
and (t) s crossed where if you were the competent responsible irreproachable people with fortitude and
conviction to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights you would have laid out the red carpet and
thanked me for all the investigative work I did to help you better serve the public interest and Attorney
General Chris Bentley “guardian of the public interest” should have been pleased if not for the fact he
is the major player along with the DOJ.
You mentioned I was provided with the rationale back in 2006, January as I recall and that was an
entirely different matter when after the York Regional Police demonstrated their incompetence to deal
with the issues as well as many other government personnel I thought I would try in addition to address
the matter under the Corporations Act….whatever they call it further demonstrating Don Wilson’s
character but Sergeant Thomson pulled one of your tricks emphasizing that he was addressing the
issues that I had presented back in November 2005 I believe it was, maybe early December under the
auspices of the Corporations Act …whatever but since then I have provided the RCMP a
preponderance of irrefutable evidence of government organized crime if you care to stay to pertinent
point, and it was delivered by e-mail via the Michael Thomson e-mail address and Sergeant Roy
Steinbach acknowledged they had the evidence on file including a disk recording of the Tribunal
hearing.
That is why he refused to accept the evidence I brought down because he stated they already had it.
Everything I am stating now is just reiterating the prodigious amount of reiterations published on the
web sites and all you have demonstrated is your incoherence to the evidence and your irresponsible
attitude towards the necessity of a responsible investigation on behalf of the people.
I have no further interest in addressing the crapola contained with your Final Letter of Disposition
when the evidence published on the web sites bares the truth and your report bares the truth of the
incompetent and irresponsible ineptness of the RCMP to protect the people as guaranteed by the
Charter when you make every effort to avoid the truth that lies within the evidence you stumbled over
looking for something to put in your one page letter of content.
Well the evidence stands for itself, not debatable and yet fools rush in to give it a try.
41
Gee, that segues me to the Commission for Public Complaints against the RCMP who were kind
enough to explain their incompetence and were determined not to get any wiser, no matter how hard I
tried.
I informed them this day would come and if they had of started getting prepared back in December
2007 they would be competently prepared so now we get to see the results.
Why would they want the public to know they are incompetent?
Don’t answer, we know don’t we?
They really are cooperative with the conspiracy but they were hired specifically for their incompetence.
Anyway I leave you all to ponder your decisions while we test the Complaints Commission.
Frank Gallagher
Manager
PS
I did make mention I am not satisfied with your incompetent irresponsible trivial, frivolous vexatious
Final Letter of Disposition didn’t I?
I suppose the obvious does not require the formality.
If I seem a little frustrated and perhaps a bit irate perhaps if we looked at the evidence we could
determine the cause and help me out.
OOPS, silly me, I keep forgetting you are not required to give a damn but when the opportunity arises
make a kind gesture.
One more time I state unless the evidence that had been provided to the RCMP up until October 18
2007 has been thoroughly examined as to its validity of the charges of government organized crime of
corruption and conspiracy the RCMP have demonstrated their incompetence to protect the public
interest.
Obviously the District Commander provides a good example of the incompetence that must ran
rampant throughout the force.
We cannot have that can we?
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
November 4 2008
To: Reviews
reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
AAAAALIST
Re: File Nos. PC-2007-2316 & PC-2007-2317

Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy
Greedy and the Needy

The needy can not give up and the greedy will not
Morality is a luxury the needy cannot afford and the greedy who have a choice do not comprehend it
Where does poverty come from?
There comes a time for all good people to realize that they are not
There are 7 billion people in the world born randomly placed to earth with innocent and empty mind
to environments ranging from extreme poverty to extreme wealth, provided with magnificent brains to
think with and bodies to do their bidding, all requiring the same necessities of life, capable of the same
emotions, susceptible to illness, injury and kindness.
Not one person had the option as to be born, who ones parents are, how they will look, what language
they will speak, how long they will live, what they will be taught to believe, what country they will be
reared in, what customs will become habit, and what ideologies will be forced on them.
When people are treated like dogs they can do nothing but run in circles trying to catch their tail and
with the grace of God the whole body moves simultaneously for if their tails suddenly stopped their
heads would be firmly embedded in their ass.
The Ideal is just Reality sanely dealt with

Nobody knows humans like humans do and reality is that which we perceive it to be which means there
are 7 billion unique perceptions of reality all of which affect the one reality, which we all exist.
It is the responsibility of society as a whole if we are ever to exist in peace and advance into the
unknown the constant new frontier where there are no bounds.
51
That is where electricity and computers were found, automobiles, aeroplanes, space ships, the secrets to
longevity and unfortunately nuclear bombs where more longevity secrets await.
The nuclear bomb was a perception of necessity that developed from our ineptness to sane moral
thought and reason and our persistence to habits and traditions with the mind having a mind of its own
inherent to the nature of humankind.
One has to ponder the wisdom of clinging to the past while struggling and promoting the future that
awaits us whereas if we were to release our hold on ancient time’s all at once we would be propelled to
where we need and want to be.
That place is the Ideal for every one of unique perceptions, a constant progressive variable where
unfortunately today to some could be a loaf of bread.
As we venture into the uncertainty of our present future I can say for certain it is not as promising as
would have been if not for the brilliance of the greedy attentive to personal favour that just happens to
be the nature of humankind.
Who does not want to advance their quality of life and just what is advancement to the 7 billion unique
perceptions?
Money is the catalyst where they who are in abundance have it covered as well as can be done but
unfortunately with advancement all the money in the world can not stop the advancement of time as the
clock starts ticking for us all at birth until it unwinds and finally stops, when reality ceases to exist, an
inevitable consequence of advancement.
Can we afford to advance so slowly into the future where longevity exists and why prolong our stay in
chaotic abyss of eons of wars, destruction, poverty, starvation and unnecessary illness due our
persistence to maintain the status quo?
What is the status quo?
Poverty is not a desired place to be born to, never asked for and not an easy place to escape, but is a
pathetic state of reality.
Nobody goes looking for it, nothing to strive for and every individual has a natural force within him or
her to distance him or her selves from it as quickly as possible.
.
Unless you have been there you can not possibly understand it
Hell, from what I have observed with 7 billion perceptions befuddling the reality we all must exist I
doubt anyone understands anything below the surface of immediate and obvious observation.
Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC born to poverty understood it as he rose to dine with kings, but left the
hierarchy, obviously of sane moral mind adept to sane moral thought and reason who identified the
most serious problem that aggravated world peace and harmony among all people.
“There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY…finally I began to make out what was
written between the lines; the entire volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
52
Obviously we can not have a peaceful world with the authorities eating people and it is possible to stop,
as I understand the Pygmy tribes have managed to break the habit.
Confucius went on to provide us the only viable means to live in peace and work together which is
pathetically obvious yet not observed by the authorities today 2500 years since he gave us the Golden
Rule.
“Do not impose on others what you would not have done to you”
So obviously true to purpose, simple to comprehend by humans of sane moral thought and reason adept
to sane moral thought and reason with fortitude and conviction to sane moral thought and reason.
Everyone of sane moral thought knows damn well the necessity of adhering to the Golden Rule even
the amoral who do their dastardly deeds under the cover of darkness even if it is in the light of day.
Reality attests that there is fungus among us and if the Golden Rule is to work we must all abide by it
or we that do are at a humongous disadvantage.
Confucius knew back then how to deal with the problem simply stating the obvious.
“Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness”
It does not matter who it is if the concept is to work, being humongously fair to all as in Democracy
and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and any person guilty of non compliance must be
punished being the only viable means known of present time with due regard to deterrence and due
diligence to the predictable attentive to prevention.
To ensure the concept is reality and ultimately the ideal there must be strict consistent enforcement by
competent responsible irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to the realization of the
spirit of every individual and society as a whole to be in, of and with the spirit of the Golden Rule
consistent with the Constitution being “The Spirit of the Law” that is conducive to every individual’s
Reality is a tell all irrefutably proving the authorities have been granted power under the auspices of the
Constitution to make the concept real, however reality also reveals the authorities are unscrupulous of
nefarious bent as per tradition that extends well past 2500 years as Confucius informed us.
Jesus paraphrased with “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you”
So they killed him providing a good understanding as to the unscrupulous nature of the authorities.
Consistent with the reality is poverty, war and civil unrest, all direct results of ignorance and selfish
purpose inherent to humankind combined with the fact we are creatures of habit.
53
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
Drink deep and taste not the Pierian spring;
There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain;
And drinking largely sobers us again.
Alexander Pope 1688 -1744
Ignorance our Albatross
The human brain is a most magnificent thing capable of extraordinary good and evil which is every
individual’s responsibility to control the evil to a point where it becomes habit where it is virtually
impossible when reality is permitted to exasperate the situation and in particular I make reference to the
illegitimate legal system whose personnel administer and enforce it precisely adverse to the
Constitution not consistent with Democracy or conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights with they who consider themselves doing well under the circumstance seeing no reason to rock
the boat not giving a damn about the ramifications upon they of lesser means
They are intoxicated with their comparatively better off than thou syndrome with the idiotic belief they
worked hard to get to where they are and the poor are just lazy bastards, dope addicts, and criminally
inclined who do not deserve their help.
They are wrong and simply fooling themselves allowing the conspirators to even take advantage of
them.in so many ways they do not even bother to think about.
1) They are cooperating with the conspirators creating the reality that is adverse to the Ideal which is
fair to everyone and yet they will mutter unfair this and unfair that while poverty persists decidedly
unfair
2) A person born to poverty has humongous challenges the majority are not aware of and most often
even the poor are not aware, being mentally challenged from the get go due the unfortunate
circumstances.
a) Quite often their parents are mentally challenged or mentally abused from the realities inherent
to poverty passed on through generation after generation.
b) We could look at the aboriginals who were free and lived off the land until the white man came
stealing what was theirs along with their way of life forcing them to live their way which is
mental anguish to say the least, and without parents to bring them up to speed in the white mans
ways where the desire is just not there, exasperates the situation.
c) The blacks have had even more of a struggle, with everything of value stolen from them,
including themselves sold into slavery and displaced from their land and families.
d) Of course there would be many who would grow up with a less than amiable attitude towards
the white man
3) It was the authorities that allowed this and the wealthy that could afford it and as always society
allowed it, with seemingly nothing the populous could do about it any more than they can seemingly do
today given the nature of people and their priority of concerns to themselves not alert to the fact that all
realities invariably affect their quality of life.
54
For instance slave labour puts others out of work and the slave owners who were obviously already not
too bad off became a whole lot richer with the slaves doing a whole lot more work for them at little
overhead.
This allows them to expand their operations buying more slaves to run them creating an industry with
many more blacks brought to a country against their will to be slaves.
a) They were demeaned, looked down upon by they who were fortunate not to be treated the
same and of course many refused to accept and attempted to escape and then considered
ornery and sometimes dangerous doing what any sane person would do if they had the guts.
b) Treated like dogs and even after they were freed they still were treated less than human as
even kids belittled them simply being raised that way to look down on them.
c) Who can imagine the rage, frustration, hopelessness and despair that were contained within
them?
d) The majority eventually accepted it over the years being just “How it is” with newborns
having not experienced the realities of they who were first enslaved knowing no different than
how they are raised and came accustomed to.
e) I suspect they actually grew up believing they were inferior.
3) A whole lot like it is with the white man who is born to poverty in hopelessness and despair who
many take solace in believing at least they are superior to the black man and any others races who find
their way to Canada in search of a better life.
a) It is only common sense to do so, which any sane person of moral thought and reason would
opine but morality is not a luxury the impoverished can afford.
b) It is all absurd, a product created by society led by the authorities and acquiesced over time
where the only way out of this maze for many is to quick money and the respect associated
with it causing many to join gangs and venture into a life of crime.
c) It is a known fact people have to eat, have a sense of belonging and hope for the future and
invariably many will go for it and others sit on their ass waiting for whatever comes along.
d) Many see the welfare system as the way to go, providing them a nice apartment, or townhouse
with many who work at low wages paying what ever the system reasons they can afford to
contribute.
e) They have many things covered such as dental care where many are far better off than they
would be if they earned more than that which allows them to enter the system and if they do
earn more they must report it and of course their rent goes up.
f) They certainly do not want to earn more than allows them to stay in the system or they will
find themselves in a lesser quality accommodation having to pay all the extras and dental care
the harder steady worker has to pay.
g) Many young girls learn from their lifer parents and choose to get pregnant to live that better
life style as they perceive it to be and the problem is simply endemic and systemic.
4) Charities flourish under these conditions and other bottom feeders like Make Poverty History who
have no intention of making that happen as they live a fine respectable lifestyle dealing with the
symptoms the authorities create.
5) Democracy Watch has found their way to a decent way of life dealing with the symptoms of a
government legal system that every position of authority is held by members of the law Society of
Upper Canada who stated or implied their members are not required to give a damn about every
55
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and evidence is irrelevant to them when against one of their
members.
A very significant humongous point is to be made there which causes all the woes of society.
They who are supposed to be administering and enforcing the law consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights refuse to do so causing all the civil chaos
This results in a humongous amount of taxes paid by they who do not feel concerns them, but it gets
worse and worse as reality attests but they do not have the sense to think it out, believing the system
serves them well keeping them distanced from the soup line.
6) Since many people are forced into poverty through no fault of their own and choose to battle their
way out by getting into criminal activities many people are victimized before they are brought before
the courts and at that time they seek legal aid financed by the taxpayer who they themselves cannot
afford to access the courts due the exorbitant costs of the illegitimate legal system that has been woven
of deceit and prevarication for the express purpose of appearing to be consistent with the Constitution
conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights intended to eradicate immoral inclination
from society but serves to cause it to flourish being particularly beneficial to the members of the Law
Societies who structured it for their members luxurious benefit refusing to put a modus operandi in
place conducive to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights of equal protection and
benefits thereby feasting off the symptoms as people are left to the slaughter becoming victims, with
many left in the wake of 1 criminal before being brought before the courts to be tried as a first offense.
The people who feel all this doesn’t concern them do not get the point until they become victims and of
course then it is too late as they become like me who for 3 years now have been seeking the justice I
am entitled to with due punishment applied to the appropriate persons who have obstructed me and
obviously obstruct others allowing the criminal element to flourish uncontested until they get into the
higher financial brackets that catch their interests.
7) It is this attitude that causes wars world wide with the persecuted inevitably forced to make a stand
against their governments.
Invariably Capitalist Pigs Democratic Governments…an Oxymoron come to the rescue but
unfortunately they attack our friends, the ones with enough nerve and common sense to realize they are
being persecuted by their governments just like we are which many support because they believe they
are doing well under the system and simply do not care about the persecuted.
They do not realize that they are helping to pay for our armies all over the world causing all the chaos
that the taxpayers finance unknowingly in many cases they are aiding the worlds enemies who simply
only care about money not giving a damn about the people.
Then you get Harris suggesting it has only cost $8 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan or
maybe it is just one of them but anyway the facts were stated on the media to be more like $14 billion
If money like this was used for constructive instead of destructive purpose poverty could be eliminated
along with all the absurdities that arise because of it.
8) Then there is the people’s tax money like the $40 billion I believe I heard in tax cuts to the oil
companies who just ransacked society for 3 months.
9) Who knows how much the members of the Law Societies ransack us through excessive court costs
due their complicated system designed to deceive the people allowing the government to orchestrate
their favourable outcomes.
56
With this going on world wide how much do you think consumer products are inflated due to
exorbitant waste and corruption?
How much better off would societies be without the members of the Law Societies that begets poverty
that begets the criminal element, welfare, legal aid and armed forces?
How many less persecuted, victims and hopelessness and despair?

How many less police and government personnel would we need to address the symptoms of a
government that will not address reality for legitimate purpose?
Go ahead and list a few yourselves and I would appreciate you forwarding them on to me.
There are a humongous number of sane moral reasons for the government and legal system personnel
to be competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to every individual’s
Unequivocally it is incomprehensible for society to suffer at the hands of the people they choose to
represent them consistent with the Constitution.
There is only one viable method of protecting the people as guaranteed prior to becoming victims and
that is for a consistent all out war on the criminal element with the intent to get to the Kingpins of
organized crime attacking at the roots.
The Charter Democracy Force www.cdf.name has taken the initiative to identify who is at the root of
the woes of the populace of the Province of Ontario and has identified and published the supporting
evidence on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition web site and the “continued” web site
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition-continued
On the latter site you will find a document to the Ontario Ombudsman,
“OmbudsmanOctober312008”
If they are competent responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights Charter Democracy will soon
commence.with the restructuring of the legal system to serve the people rather than ransack them.
On September 23 2008 I filed for a Review of the complaint I filed with the Commission for Public
Complaints against the RCMP whose Final Letter of Disposition is published on the
http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition being absolutely absurd with every
effort to avoid his or her responsibility to protect every individual as guaranteed.
On October 7 2008 I e-mailed the Reviews section in response to their letter of

September 24 2008 to me stating they have requested the RCMP forward the
pertinent evidence.
I had made note in my September 23 2008 Request for a Review that Staff Sergeant R.B.
MacAdam’s report was of particular importance and that it should be requested and
immediately put in their hands not allowing time for the RCMP to tamper with the
evidence.
57
I mentioned this again on October 7 2008 requesting confirmation as to whether or not
they had received the evidence and requested a copy of said evidence.
If the Commission was staffed with competent responsible irreproachable personnel with
fortitude and conviction conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights adept
to sane moral thought and reason in, of and with “The Spirit of the Law” they would have
been aghast at the evidence and thanked me ever so much for all my efforts to reveal
the facts of the Government Organized Crime.
They would assuredly recognize me as loyal Canadian citizen and show me all the respect
I deserve and at the very least confirm whether or not they received the pertinent
evidence from the RCMP, which they have failed to do.
Considering my demonstrated competence to deal with the issues the said Staff Sergeant
MacAdam report would be most beneficial in my hands, and if for no other reason remove
any doubt his report could have now been falsified.
It has now been near 1 ½ months having not received it, could very well now have have
been defiled.
Reviews
I request again that you acknowledge whether or not you have received the
pertinent evidence from the RCMP and will you send me a copy of Staff Sergeant
R.B.MacAdam’s final report on the complaint I registered with the Commission.
Under separate cover with the RCMP upper echelon having not responded to my
request for them to investigate and file charges against the major player in the
Ontario government organized crime of corruption and conspiracy I will be filing
another complaint against the true RCMP authorities behind the 2 members who I
originally filed against, with them having now irrefutably proving their major roles
in the conspiracy.
Please tend to these issues immediately informing me how you are progressing
with the Review
Thank you,
Frank Gallagher
Manager
This document “ReviewsRCMPComplaintsOctober42008” is published on the

http://groups.google.com/group/rcmp-final-letter-of-disposition-continued
58
October 7 2008
Reviews
Commission for Public Complaints
Against RCMP
reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca
www.cdf.name
Re: File Nos. PC-2007-2316 & PC-2007-2317
Government Organized Crime
Corruption and Conspiracy
Dear Reviews
Your letter by Canada Post dated September 24 2008 states you have requested the RCMP to forward
you the pertinent evidence pursuant to my request where urgency is of the essence to ensure there is no
time for the RCMP and other conspirators to manipulate the evidence.
I am most concerned that you should now have secured a copy of RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B.
MacAdam’s report who was assigned by the office of the RCMP Commissioner to investigate my
complaint.
The Staff Sergeant spent 8 months studying the evidence and it is germane to the complaint as to his
competence to review the evidence consistent with the Constitution in support of every individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.
As the evidence on the Charter Democracy Force web sites irrefutably proves the entire government
modus operandi is consistent with that of the Law Society of Upper Canada, which has been
documented and published as the 2 part Law Society of Upper Canada document.
In this document they clearly state or imply their members are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights nor is evidence relevant to their decisions when it is against their
members.
The “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” published on the Ontario web site clearly
states he is responsible as the “guardian of the public interest” and the “guardian of the rule of law” to
protect every individual and society as a whole and yet he has been provided the 2 part Law Society of
Upper Canada document along with a preponderance of other evidence which he has refused to deal
with consistent with the Constitution conducive to the support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights.
He is the advisor of all Cabinet Ministers, government departments and agencies who have all refused
to deal with these most serious issues and I expect no different from your Reviews office consistent
with the conspiracy.
You have more than just the responsibility to study the evidence published on the webs sites to
coherency to determine if the RCMP have acted appropriately conducive to the protection of every
individual as guaranteed by the Charter as it imperative that you demonstrate due diligence to the
support of every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights particularly since the evidence highly suggests
59
you will not be cooperative with me as it is impossible to do so and remain consistent with the
conspiracy.
Once again the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site irrefutably proves the
conspiracy and all government personnel who have responded to the evidence have had precisely the
same evidence to review and their responses or no responses is self – evident they are not competent
responsible and irreproachable with fortitude and conviction to the Constitution conducive to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, however they have all been consistent with the conspiracy
conducive to its success.
The evidence clearly shows due diligence to the conspiracy clearly orchestrated from the office of the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and the office of the Ontario Attorney General
regarding the issues I have presented relative to incidents that occurred in Ontario.
The RCMP Superintendent’s Final Letter of Disposition dated September 3 2008, less than 2 pages of
context is incomprehensible clearly demonstrating that he is not competent responsible and
irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the Constitution conducive to every
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights however it irrefutably proves he is consistent with the
conspiracy.
On the other hand the evidence published on the Charter Democracy Force web site attests that I have
been competent responsible irreproachable with fortitude and conviction consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where we comprehend the
significance of evidence and the necessity of its acquisition to support allegations and have applied
every effort to obtaining pertinent evidence to ensure the truth, the whole truth is being provided for all
to see and act appropriately.
To maintain our consistency to the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights and our attentiveness to competent responsible and irreproachable approach with fortitude and
conviction we request confirmation you are now in receipt of the pertinent evidence requested from the
RCMP with relative information confirming the date that you received it.
Consistent with democracy and equality guaranteed by the Charter I request a copy of the evidence
acquired from the RCMP relative to my complaint where I am particularly interested in the contents of
RCMP Staff Sergeant R.B. MacAdam’s report after 8 months of studying the pertinent evidence.
It is imperative that we know whether or not his perception of what he was to accomplish is consistent
with the Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights or not.
If you do not comprehend this then your perception is not adept to these most serious issues.
I remind you that laws, policies, procedures and normal routines set out by the conspirators are of no
force or effect as to their inconsistencies with the Constitution
60
I request you consider wisely before you make a decision not to cooperate with me consistent with the
Constitution conducive to every individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
I request immediate acknowledgement of receipt of this document

“RequestReviewsProvideEvidenceOctober72008” published on the RCMP Final Letter of Disposition”
web site under heading “Reviews Correspondence”
I also request immediate confirmation as to whether or not you are in now in possession of the evidence
requested from the RCMP and whether or not you intend to immediately forward the requested
evidence to me.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Manager
PS
It is imperative you and everyone understands the present financial crisis cannot be dealt with
appropriately by the conspirators that caused it who will invariably be attentive to the preservation of
their own asses and their own financial well being, as always humongously detrimental to the safety
and wellbeing of the individual and society as a whole.
They must be exposed and appropriate action taken to ensure competent responsible people with
fortitude and conviction to the Constitution and our Charter rights are provided the authority to lead us
out of the financial crisis hugely detrimental to world peace and the well being of the world populace.
61
Public Inquiry warranted and demanded
Only the conspirators will object and thereby thrust themselves upon
their own swords
This was well worth the wait, but unfortunately society has paid far too
much for the pleasure and cannot afford to wait any longer.
September 26 2008 Expediency is of the essence
www.cdf.name PUBLIC INQUIRY NOW!!!!

The unscrupulous Government members of the Law Societies and their unscrupulous counterpart’s world wide are responsible for
present reality as certain as always as history attests where:
Their insatiable quest for wealth and power in cooperation with the affluent and influential and multinational corporate conglomerates
have manipulated the markets indifferent to the safety and wellbeing of the people of the Lower Tiers and now when their
manipulations are back firing on them, they who have been ransacking us to poverty reveal they have always had the money to deal
with poverty and prove their indifference to poverty by now pulling out the money to save their asses. They are only coherent to
poverty when it nears them and justice will be learned the hard way.
Can we trust the people who have been irrefutably proven to be unscrupulous back stabbing cancers upon society to act responsibility
all of a sudden for Society or will they use their BENEVOLENCE, RIGHTEOUSNESS and MORALITY ploy to keep their
unscrupulous Law Societies luxuriously secure and us in poverty to the bitter end?
Quite a responsibility for the Chair of their Commission. Such a serious issue belongs to the democratic moral majority
62
Resistance to sanity is MAD When minds are lost best lose
Resistance to MAD is sad yours before going MAD
If it makes you mad it probably is

Enforcing the Law A novel idea
Common Sense Evolution

Red Coats Mad Plan 2008
The Law is a book to go by...not a book to go buy Charter rights are not for sale or rent
Yet the members of the Society sell and rent them over and over again
The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada believe they are the law and are if we believe them
Law Society proclaims their members do not give a dam about the Canadians Charter Rights
The Law Society demonstrate they do not give a damn with every effort to prove it
Ontario Attorney General Michael Bryant demonstrates he doesn’t give a damn

why and the “Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General” explains
Politicians debate what’s good for the Society
and the Attorney General assures and enacts it
Lawyer’s debate them on the immoral’s behalf and sure enough their cut behalf
The moral majority finance it but victims don’t have a chance making us all victims perchance it
How MAD are we?
63
Commissioner of the Royal
So glad Canadian
you asked Mounted Police
Where’s Zack….. We want Zack
Too bad Zack didn’t realize the government was the organized crime
He might have been here today to help. Right?
Well you are here and realize the government is organized crime. Right?
Of course you do. First hand experience and now you’re a real honest to goodness RCMP
You knew before you received the evidence but what do you do? … is the problem at hand eh? Bill
Do you mind if I call you Bill, Bill………I’ll take that as a yes and you can call me Frank because I
obviously am frank. Eh Bill?
Here you have the conspirators counting on you and you know you can count on them, but what if the people
find out.
Hell, what’s the odds?
Are you sure?
I presume you can count on the Commission for Public Complaints.
Makes this individual want to cry.
You can be who ever you want to be and what you are, so are the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and so
ensures the individual’s lowly place in life in this great country of ours under the supremacy of God who is
just a figment of imagination as is our guaranteed Charter rights.
Why? You know why
64
November 13, 2007
info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org;
edmonton@cba-alberta.org; cba@bccba.org; cba-
mba@mts.net; admin@cbanb.com; cba-
nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca;
cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca;
cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick,On
L4P 2P8
Dear Canadian Bar Association Representatives
I am just an ordinary citizen of Canada, perhaps a little less passive and a little more conviction
towards the acquisition of justice as I have been on the trail 24/7 since June 30 2005 with it nowhere in
site here in Ontario.
I have looked under every rock and found nothing but snakes, venomous for sure and I was just
wondering if they are spread throughout Canada.
My main concern is to whether or not the Canadian individual is actually guaranteed Charter Rights as
provided in The Constitution Act, 1982 or perhaps they are something you can rent when needed and
can afford them or is there perhaps a way of purchasing them out right or can you only rent them if you
have an excellent credit rating.
65
If a crook cleans you out is your acquisition to justice negated for being so stupid or is it the
governments fault for not getting the message to me that there are bad people running around the
country?
Well let me get to the point
I have accomplished nothing in the line of justice here in Ontario and in fact the evidence I have
collected along the way proves irrefutably it is impossible to achieve the justice as stated and implied in
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for quite obvious reason which the Law Society of Upper
Canada related to me in a completely different matter than the one I an providing you today.
They are quite adamant their members do not give a damn about the individual’s guaranteed Charter
Rights which makes it quite difficult for me to discern how it would be possible for the individual to
achieve justice consistent with the supreme law of Canada, with their members having infested the
legal system.
I am requesting you review the attachments and study the referenced evidence responding FFF.
Should you find anything that seems not particularly right in your understanding of The Law take
appropriate action to address the issues.
You will read that I do not have confidence in the government personnel due their indifference to the
issues I have addressed them where my analysis of the evidence proves irrefutably government
personnel are engaged in a conspiracy against the Canadian people whereby the individual who is
guaranteed Charter rights hasn’t a hope in hell accessing them alone and hasn’t a hope in hell
organizing the people to stand together to assert their rights.
Of course if I was gay I would have a membership to contend with.
In any case I would like you to review the actions taken by the Law Society of Upper Canada against
the particular lawyer referenced within the said file and take action where it is due in your professional
opinions.
I am sending this to Canadian Bar Association Representatives across the country and I presume the
significance of the serious nature of the issues will be readily apparent to you.
I would appreciate very much if you each addressed the issues in an independent manner and studied
the evidence as if you each were the individual looking for justice.
In other words put yourself in my shoes using your intelligent heads to determine if you would be
getting a fair shake under the law and if not set out a course of action as to how you would address it.
I do not expect you to respond to me nor do I expect you to act on my behalf.
I was hoping perchance once you have all completed addressing your analysis of the evidence and
identified the or any inadequacies as per your individual departments perception of The Law, the
Constitution, you would accumulate them to one department and distribute the whole 15 to each
department simultaneously for analysis for the purpose of restructuring a Legal System conducive to
and consistent with the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, which believe it or not is a significant
concern to them even if they are not aware.
66
Surely there can be no doubt it is time for significant change to the Legal System and perhaps it will be
more apparent if you should take on this endeavor independently and then together as suggested or in
some manner more suitable to your intelligence obviously having a broader oversight than I could
possibly have although I do have a particular view perchance you have not yet chanced upon and I
highly suspect no more desire to do than I.
However having done so why not take advantage of putting your minds together to compare apples
against apples or oranges against oranges as you prefer.
Just a thought as they persistently pop up without a thought as to what to do with them.
I would appreciate it if someone would forward this information on to Mr. Gary H. Pon up there in
Nunavut because it just has become too costly to fax for me.
It has also occurred to me he may be lonely up there and glad to here from us in the south.
Perhaps he may suggest if we just all went ice fishing we would all keep out of trouble.
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
PS
I would appreciate however knowing if you see the necessity to address the issues in some manner.
67
November 13, 2007
Frank Gallagher
34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick, On
L4P 2P8
Canada
Constitution Act, 1982

Canada is founded upon the supremacy of God and the rule of law
1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set
out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably
justified in a free and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience

and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including
freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of
peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.
Guardians of the Canadians Charter of Rights and Freedoms

http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
The Conspiracy
Office of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Office of the Attorney General of Ontario
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
Law Society of Lower Tier Canada
PUBLIC INQUIRY
On September 1 2006 the preliminary findings of an investigation undertaken by myself, a former
Provincial Government and City of Toronto employee, suggesting a provincial government
conspiracy against the people of Ontario were presented to the Premier of Ontario Dalton McGuinty
and several other top government officials including Peter Van Loan of the Federal Government to
provide them the opportunity to commence or cause to commence proceedings to expose the
government personnel involved so as to bring them before the justice system of Canada where the
evidence identified as the BLACK BOOK clearly showed there were serious inconsistencies of the
Ontario laws with the Constitution Act, 1982 the supreme law of Canada. Allegations of obstruction
of justice under the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 and the criminal code of the Constitution Act, 1982
68
When the Premier and others failed to respond to the BLACK BOOK given the apparent serious nature
of the issues I began to circulate the evidence to various government departments and levels of
government and upon receiving no positive response began to realize the whole legal system was corrupt
and in on a conspiracy against the people which presented some what of an impediment to my original
quest to have a fraud brought to justice, which expanded to include obstruction of justice by certain
government personnel and then to government conspiracy against the people.
In the early stages of my investigation I was running on plain old common sense and a whole lot of
experience in investigative practice having retired from a forty year career in land surveying having
spent 10 years with the province of Ontario, 16 years in the private sector where I was managing a small
survey office before wrapping up my 40 year career with 14 years at the City of Toronto.
Obviously the challenge was insurmountable to take on the whole damn government, one person against
Goliath without slingshot nor any faith in God.
What I did have was faith in me being particularly adept to the challenge, unorthodox in my ways
having always looked for better and faster ways than the conventional which had been well established
long before my presence on the scene.
So having recently retired having availability of time, confidence in my experience with fortitude and
conviction, confidence in the incompetence of government personnel and their persistence to resist
change and their general attitude of killing a day in their quest to retirement, their general ineptitude to
learn any more than what they have been told and adherence to routine and their general confidence in a
thing dependent on sticking together to a belief of ignorant persuasion unfounded of common sense and
having often taken on such challenges before to change the ideology of well established principles this
was an opportunity and challenge of a lifetime I had lucked upon. Attitude towards purpose is
everything.
As in any challenge it serves well to know your opponent and in this case they didn’t know me and in
fact they are so bloody ignorant they don’t even know themselves.
Their persistence to ignorance and continuity to incompetence enforced by habit and routine and their
confidence dependent on the support of others akin leave them extraordinarily vulnerable devoid of
common sense intent to original purpose of hire and that which is intended and necessary to accomplish.
I have taken on such challenges successfully many times before in single offices and departments before
but the whole damn government?
Ha ha ha, this indeed was going to be a decent challenge with no likely help in sight.
As I set myself to the task gathering and studying what ever I could get my hands on pertinent to the
endeavor being abundantly aware of the value of documentation and it’s authority upon circumstance
and the significance of priority of legitimate evidence and the difference between what is relative
evidence to the purpose and what is evidence as to what has been done whereas a continuity of evidence
coincidental to an erroneous presumption makes the whole string of evidence irrelative to the purpose
required to be achieved even though the evidence is abundantly weighted given an apparent advantage to
the erroneous conclusion over limited evidence of legitimate support credence must be given in support
of that which was originally intended even to the extent of taking many steps back before continuance of
the original legitimate course to purpose.
Once achieved with significance to fact, due consideration must be to the resolve from the point of
deception and resulting detriments in efficient effective manner consistent with and conducive to
original purpose with due regard to continuity of sanity.
Tradition is a preponderance of consistencies perhaps supported by a proliferation of truths but when

continuity of tradition is extrapolated inconsistent to sane and legitimate purpose it is null and void from
. 69
the point of diversion and all once considered truths from said point of deviation remain
evident true to the deviation however of no value relative to the integrity of legitimate purpose.
That is to state for all intent and purpose they are mythical and habitual in nature inane to
purpose.
As is the nature of habit and the government personnel’s persistence to it being the basis their
intelligence is traditionally founded on they can be depended on to be consistent with each other
as assuredly as their confident is dependent on support from each other but break one link in
that chain and that which the chain supports collapses.
Within each department are a few competent people of unique perception amongst many
followers who are devoid of consistent sane reason persistently reasoning aloud aggravating
clear and precise path to intended purpose which assuredly must be reasoned but left to those
capable.
These inane people who learn by rote inundated with truths of superfluity gathered on diversion
obscure and befuddle the clear path providing obstacles to one, intent on taking it, where
tendency is to take the path of least resistance creating a long arduous journey of apparent
insanity to purpose but the only sane way to get there due the insanity.
Upon reaching the intended destination due regard must be given to straightening the course
from the point of commencement having proof of success in hand removing one by one the
obstructions that originally stood in path elongating the original trek to exorbitant financial and
time loss.
Failure to remove, these obstructions will persist to obstruct again and again to the humongous
detriment to successful achievement of effective efficient legitimate sane purpose they are inept
and detrimental to.
Digressions are the catalysts to eradicate the superfluities of diversions where associated truths
are relative to the diversions only as authentic as the diversion itself relative to the true bearing
from beginning to end of legitimate sane purpose where a traverse of trial and error was
originally traveled from beginning as a means to the success.
A straight line from beginning to end can then be drawn and any point along the diversion can
be computed as to its offset from the truth though indeed all and any evidence of the diversion
remains steadfast as truth of the diversion alone, not the truth of the true line of legitimate
purpose.
These truths of the diversion serve a purpose of their own consistent with the diversion whereas
it may be beneficial to the true purpose to determine why the diversion was so far off course
and who was responsible and why for the purpose of deterrence of reoccurrence of the
superfluity.
With some incite as to where I am coming from and definite knowledge of intent to expose the
government conspiracy I have staged a mocked Public Trial where the evidence is real and the
public is not being all there is the “threshold” so to speak between the Reality and the Fiction.
Quite an accomplishment for just one individual but I have to admit I couldn’t have done it
without the cooperation of the government personnel who persistently remained true as to that
which I knew to be true about them. How true their incompetence and consistence to it. Eh?
70
Public Trial
Fiction or Reality?
The Fiction of the Attorney General

Fiction or Reality?
Belief
Yes, it is all in the belief

Nothing to do with what I believe for the evidence is real
What’s it matter what I believe now that I accomplished my belief?
I have proved it irrefutably to no one but me because no one has seen it, though available on the web for
the public to see no one has seen it I believe
Do you see what I mean? Oh, then you must have seen it.
So you are either no one or just no one of useful purpose to me or the issues I addressed. Right?
Given the evidence is real, you are real, I am real and it’s all on my web in the public domain which is real
and you have all been provided the evidence and televisions and radios are real, the Toronto Sun and Star
being real and yet I have heard nothing about the issues which are real being addressed I realistically find
you all guilty as I had set out to prove .
All that remains is the hanging, so to speak.
I have heard it said.

Give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.
Mission accomplished I believe.

Well that was good for me, was it good for you?
The thing with fiction and reality is they are both real with fiction being a deviation of reality.
Now we just draw a straight line from 1982 to 2007 with the individual’ guaranteed Charter Rights the
purpose.
My individual guaranteed Charter rights were seriously violated on June 30 2005 at an Ontario Rental
Housing Tribunal by my former tenant in front of the judicator Nancy Fahlgren being well aware , in a
public building financed by the people of Ontario to administer justice to and for the people where justice
has not yet been served on this Wednesday the 14th day of November 2007 which you all are aware and in
fact have been found guilty as per which the evidence irrefutably proves by your refusal to commence or
cause to commence proceedings consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter
rights
You being the prominent government personnel whose e-mail addresses are listed on page 37 of the
document dated November 12 2007 “Mad Glad mostly Sad WHY?.doc” to be found on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
71
Court of Appeal
With due consideration to your rights to appeal even though you have not contested the findings of the
Public Trial which the evidence irrefutably proved and by your continued persistence not to deal with the
issues which are of a most serious nature regarding your willful refusal to demonstrate a modus operandi is
in place consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and having been
provided the irrefutable evidence my Charter rights have been violated and remain steadfast not to
administer and enforce justice in respect of my Charter rights I have taken the responsibility to assure you
all will receive the justice you are entitled to under the Constitution Act, 1982 with due consideration to
your guaranteed individual Charter rights.
Having said that and after a preliminary investigation into the Federal Governments ability to perform their
duties consistent with and conducive to your individual guaranteed Charter rights I have initiated
proceedings in the form of a Public Inquiry to clear the way and safe guard your rights to a fair trial before
the Federal courts
The following is my initiatives to this endeavor.
On my web site Law Society of Lower Tier Canada http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

towards the bottom of the page you will see the following link to a document which is a cover document
addressed to the RCMP which I took to the Newmarket detachment accompanied by my mother on
October 18 2007 along with the documents listed on page 9 therein which Sgt. Steinebech declined to take
possession of
Request RCMP investigation of Government Conspiracy.doc (3)
Immediately below that are links to the evidence listed on page 9 aforesaid and below that is a link to
RCMP Meeting Recap October 18 2007.doc which is a recap of that said meeting with Sgt.
Steinebach RCMP
From there if you would care to join me on my web site Guardians of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms near
the top of the page you will see a link to my letter to Stockwell Day Minister of Public Safety dated
November 3 2007 which makes reference to previous efforts to get Federal Government personnel to
address the issues regarding the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights.
Below that are links to other documents demonstrating my efforts to the endeavor and to this date
November 14 2007 I have not received any indication they are responsive to my concerns leaving the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights unprotected by the Federal Government the issuers of the
guarantee, which implicates them to the conspiracy and most certainly are responsible to back the
guarantee as is fundamental to common law having accepted financial benefit to provide a service
consistent with and conducive to the guarantee as per the provisions of the Charter to each individual.
With all the evidence in and having been provided the opportunity to respond to the evidence and failing to
do so and furthermore having not commenced or caused to commence proceedings consistent with and
conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights they too of the Federal Government referred within
the documents referred to herein are guilty of conspiracy against the Canadian people.
It may be Fiction to you people until the Public Read it when it will become real.
The Commission for Public Complaints Against the Royal Canadian Mounted Police have advised in
accordance with the RCMP Act, my complaint was forwarded to the Commissioner for appropriate action.
What do you suppose that means?
72
Toronto Star and Toronto Sun
I’m sure you know better than I how all this will work out.
Will I live long enough to see a real investigation?
How long should an investigation take when it is already done?
You have the evidence.
You people could jump in anytime or do you expect it to be covered up and you’re just doing your
part?
Perhaps you don’t give a damn about the people.

The evidence appears that way wouldn’t you think?
You people operate under your rights guaranteed under the Charter and I am sure you have had some
interesting challenges.
How convenient that you just happened to have the media to support your cause.
It works because the people support you.
73
Why wouldn’t you support the people?
Just one of those things in reality Eh
Me, me, me.
Aren’t you guys first to claim the public have the right to know what’s going on?
Oh, I see. They have no rights unless you decide to support them.
It’s supposed to work two ways I am sure you know.

Just forgot for a moment. Eh?
There is a huge story here of Historic Epic unless of course you like things fine how they are with the
people taking the shaft.
We’ll soon know
Why not interview some of the people. Start with Lawyer Files # 1-3. Find out where Attorney General
Michael Bryant first came into the picture. At the beginning, Right? You know it all
Does the Commission do what they advertise to do?
Not bloody likely.
No government department or agency is going to be provided the authority to expose and eliminate the
government conspirators for obvious reason they are the ones who hand out the authority. Right?
Well pretty soon I will have exposed the whole damn system from every direction.
Oh, I get it. Since I was doing so well gathering the irrefutable evidence in natural course of pursuance
of justice they would expose themselves rather than cover things up as they would when reporters come
snooping around.
Brilliant, I do all the work, and when you are ready to cash in when circulation slows presto, you’re in
business again.
Perhaps for Christmas you will give the people what they have long been waiting for.
Nail the government conspirators to the cross.
When they cite their traditional values and- the rule of law-which has long been the well
established legal principle of that elusive concept, hard to easily define which protects the individual
and society as a whole which the Attorney General is responsible to guard as his Office has
traditionally done you will be prepared to stomp on them.
Good plan. Don’t forget to give them enough rope and make sure they all get a chance to speak to that
proving that is indeed their present day ideology and mode of operandi.
Then perhaps cite the words of Confucius to support their traditionalism stretching far back at least
2500 years ago.
74
“There were no dates in this history but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words
Benevolence, Righteousness and Morality….finally I began to make out what was written between the
lines; the whole volume was filled with a single phrase: EAT PEOPLE”
Then present the letter from the York Regional Police Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge dated January 10
2006 where he makes reference to issues being connected to the legislative framework which has long
been established in this country. (See page 18)
Once they have all proved their consistency to helping the Attorney General guard –the rule of law-
that most elusive concept, hard to easily define, that well established legal principle which the Office of
the Attorney General has traditionally guarded to incompetently protect the individual and society as a
whole proving all the government personnel are consistent and persistent to the endeavor proving
irrefutably the established modus operandi of the government today is consistent with the tradition and
the Attorney General who has guarded it well you can table the Constitution Act, 1982 (document)
which contains the guarantee to each individual and society as a whole which demands competent
responsible government personnel irreproachable to the support of the guarantee.
Then when they do their Jackie Gleason “humma humma humma” we’ll laugh and laugh and laugh
savoring every moment before we nail them to the cross.
Ha ha ha, I get it, Brilliant Toronto Star and Toronto Sun as the darkness of night representative by the
Star slips into the bright sunny day representative by the Sun.
Sure it’s all documented but they are creatures of habit and will continue to argue as they are wont to
do and perhaps entitled to do before 1982 but once the Constitution was enacted in 1982 their
traditional ways were precluded as were all laws and precedence set which were inconsistent with the
spirit of the Law under the supremacy of God where as to their inconsistencies were of no force or
effect.
The ramifications are extraordinarily stupefying where the whole damn government personnel of
mandated authority have caused incalculable deprivations upon the Canadian individual’s and has
allowed to persist due the unusual coincidence of circumstance where the ineptness of the people naïve
to The Law being attentive to private sector endeavors and their undying trust and faith in the legal
system that the personnel will watch each other consistent with The Law while the mandated
authorities of the establishment took advantage of their faithful trust as they carried on business as
usual as they have traditionally, defined in the words of Confucius so long ago.
Quite a formidable length of time indicative of the depth of experience to the traditional endeavors to
“EAT PEOPLE” as they ransacked, used and consumed them to sate their avarice habits.
“Men’s natures are alike; it’s their habits that carry them far apart”
They have had 25 years to break their old habits while the people and society suffered as they do from
all of immoral persuasion, whereas the evidence shows their resistant to change having been caught
cold turkey must be stopped cold turkey and I have charged the Commissioner of the RCMP with that
responsibility.
Commissioner William Elliot alias “Bill” is just the man to do it being experienced in their traditional
habits of slippery ways appearing headed east towards the rise of a new day but bent west intent of
continuous darkness of their traditional good old days.
75
Mister Bill has chanced upon a most difficult challenge with no precedence to guide him and the dire
necessity unprecedented where cold turkey he must about face or end up on our hot plates Christmas
Day.
Somewhat of a befuddlement but the people are fed up with paying the bills, the Michaels, Armands
and Bruces and the Randys of The Law enforcerment who are incompetent due their incoherence to it
as they have been caught up and addicted to the habitual ways of their predecessors as did they before
them on and on in descent of chain of ancestry being in dissent of present law namely the Constitution
Act, 1982 which is the supreme law of Canada which recognizes the principle of the supremacy of God
affirmed in the verbiage and particularly defined as
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of
the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived
thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on
race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
Attentiveness to The Law is mandatory to all Canadians but none should be more informed than the
government personnel financed to administer and enforce it whereas they must be competent,
responsible and irreproachable to it so as to support the guarantee of the Charter in a manner consistent
with and conducive to it as per any guarantee of common law and tradition with due regard to common
sense and the sanity attributed to it.
It is the presumption that the Constitution (Document) and the Constitution (Establishment) are one and
the same but it is the presumption they must be the same that provides the direction to where a
conclusion lies but presumed evidence of the presumption remains a state of mind until valid evidence
is presented in it’s support and every rock turned to assure no rebut exists to challenge.
Obvious neglect to precise coherence of The Law in administering and enforcing provides clear and
present danger to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights where an inconsistency in administering or
enforcing The Law is an immediate deprivation to the individual’s Charter rights not only directly of
the victim of particular circumstance but every individual who finances the system as a taxpayer and
indirectly every person dependent on them for their personal well being.
Where an inconsistency with The Law is identified it is incumbent upon the government personnel
mandated to administer and enforce it to immediately address the inconsistency to eradicate any
possibility of reoccurrence and when it is found that it is a human deliberation for personal benefit due
regard to deterrence must be applied with deliberate due regard.
For the purpose of due regard to the necessity of coherence all verbiage of law must be presumed to
have been written in the spirit of God who is supreme in matters of the supreme law of Canada and
consistent due regard must adhere to its interpretation.
76
Credence must be given to that which can be least mistaken by humankind whereas the following
words of Jesus who was closest to God and knew well of his aspirations was heard and well known to
say.
As common sense attests and commonly known, no law will be consistently obeyed unless consistently
enforced and where adherence to justice is demanded of law and consistency to punishment must be
attentive to an eye for an eye with due regard to deliberate intent where priority is to diligence to the
predictable and deterrence to the prevention.
Whereas the present modus operandi of the present authorities has been irrefutably evidenced and
proven incompetent to the endeavor and by the government personnel’s consistence to it having
demonstrated their continuance in persistence having been provided the irrefutable evidence of their
unscrupulous disregard in respect of The Law which they have permitted to run rampant and provided
asylum to their associate accomplices leaves the presumption of their authority unsupported with no
rock left unturned leaving absolutely nothing to be debated finds them without authority leaving them
to be duly informed by a mandated authority who acts within the confines and purpose of The Law.
That responsibly is Mister Bill’s, RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and under the authority of the
Constitution Act, 1982 (Document) which he has been charged, financed and sworn to uphold must do
so consistent with the spirit of The Law in the spirit of God who is supreme as recognized by the
supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 whereas the evidence presented to him is
irrefutable to the fact the Government mandated personnel referenced within the documents presented
do not recognize the principles of The Law namely the supremacy of God and the aspirations attributed
to him which have been clearly written into The Law and excerpts presented on page 15 thereby null
and voiding their authority wherever their inconsistency which the evidence is quite clear they are
consistent and persistent to inconsistency with the Constitution leaving them without authority and
vulnerable to any mandated authority who acts consistent with and conducive to the spirit of The Law
and God and it is Bill’s responsibility to bring them before the courts to face the justice of the people
and where any government personnel mandated under the authority of the Constitution acts in a manner
inconsistent with their obligation to administer and enforce justice pursuant to The Law shall be
immediately removed of their authority and dealt with in consistent manner as the government
personnel brought before them.
Quite simple eh Bill? (aside…I know Bill’s watching)
Good, let the festivities begin.
77
78
79
80
81
82
“A man who has committed a mistake and doesn’t correct it, is committing another mistake”
I believe it is reasonable to presume that this applies to the ladies. Right Ladies?
Consistency of belief guaranties consistency of consequence
What can be said of truth without evidence or willingness to

back?
83
He who traditionally argues in defense in support of a tradition after its preclusion by Law, either stated or implied
confirms the tradition and his ineptness to kick the habit attesting to the incompetence of his immediate superior
and ultimately those under his authority.
Being the author I can assert this applies to the ladies equally.
I request you all take responsibility to assure everyone referenced herein has been made aware of the issues and
the importance to their well being so they may take advantage of this final opportunity to address them in a
manner consistent with The Law by which granted them their authority and to collect financial benefit for their
efforts in service of our Country and the Canadian people.
Perchance the RCMP forget to advise you of your rights upon arrest I take this opportunity to advise that you have
the right to remain silent and highly suggest you do so for persistent to traditional habit will betray you and will be
used against you as will the evidence I have documented irrefutably to your part in the conspiracy.
There are no words you can state in your defense that you haven’t already stated or implied by your silence when
immediate action was and is demanded addressing the issues and to restructure the system adept to the protection
and benefit of each individual as guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Under the clear and present circumstance you have only one favorable option beneficial to you and we the other
individual’s referenced in the Charter guarantee.
In the spirit of the season I wish you all a Merry Christmas hoping you experience the true spirit devoid of
commercialism which will take care of itself.
You have been charged and privileged to act in the service of the Lord under the authority of the Constitution
which recognizes His supremacy and by the power vested to you must restructure the legal system adept to your
responsibility to support the guarantee of the Charter consistent with the provisions granted equally to every
individual of Canada which is not an option of debate.
I wish you all a Merry, Merry Christmas and pray you will experience the true spirit of Christmas and retain it in
habitual bliss as you carry out your duties through the years to come in that spirit prerequisite to your power of
authority.
In that spirit of accepted habit you will attend to the issues addressed in my writings experiencing the joy
privileged with it as each individual finds God not as a fictional belief but a belief that is real as law and order
under His guidance consistent and conducive to His spirit in the spirit of The Law, the Constitution of Canada
prevails.
The web of persistent deceit woven by the members of the Law Society for their members benefit will benefit
them no longer as priority is to the guaranteed individual’s Charter rights which are attached to them as an arm or
leg, not to be debated.
Those government personnel who do not act in good faith of The Law will experience the wrath of The Law and
God at their own expense.
Merry Christmas and goodbye

Frank Gallagher
84
The following e-mail addresses have been sent this document “Commissioner RCMP November
16, 2007” which is available for all to see on my web site “Guardians of the Canadians
Charter of Rights and Freedoms” http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-
charter-of-rights-and-freedoms I know Bill Commissioner RCMP William Elliot will study
this document as he reviews all the evidence in competent manner which will lead him to it
As per usual I request you all to study it well as if your way of life is dependent on it as each
individual’s way of life guaranteed by the Charter is dependent on your fortitude and conviction to it
FFF. You had best think for yourselves or others will do it for you.
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; MCU@JUSTICE.GC.CA
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunpub.com;city@thestar
.ca; christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.org;fureyg@se
n.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;gautht@sen.parl.gc.c
a;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;jcrivest@sen.parl.
gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;
lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.ca;munsoj@se
n.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov; mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.gc.ca;vanlop1@parl.g
c.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca; info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca;
Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca; Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;
MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;

Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca; Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca;
Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca; Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca;
Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca; ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org;
terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca; justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scc-
csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca; mmacpherson@pco-
bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca; plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-
giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca; info@police.york.on.ca; info@cba.org; mail@cba-alberta.org; edmonton@cba-alberta.org;
cba@bccba.org; cba-mba@mts.net; admin@cbanb.com; cba-nl@nl.rogers.com; cbanwt@lawsociety.nt.ca; cbans@ns.sympatico.ca; info@oba.org; cba-
pei@isn.net; info@abcqc.qc.ca; cba.sk@sasktel.net; cbayukon@internorth.com
85
Individual Guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms
The Federal Government signed sealed and delivered the
Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize

the supremacy of God and the rule of law

subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.
2. Everyone has the following fundamental 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and
freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and security of the person and the right not to be
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, deprived thereof except in accordance with the
opinion and expression, including freedom of principles of fundamental justice.
the press and other media of communication;
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d)
to any cruel and unusual treatment or
freedom of association.
punishment.
Credence must be given to that which is least likely to be mistaken by humankind
The evidence I have provided to the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP on
November 8 2007, File No. PC-2007-2316 and ….2317 has been forwarded to the Commissioner of
the RCMP for appropriate action and acknowledged November 16 2007 File 2007-1355445 proves
irrefutably the Constitution (Establishment) administers and enforcers of the Constitution (Document)
are not only incompetent to that endeavor but have deliberately put a modus operandi in place
conducive to the well being and benefit of the immoral of society to the humongous detriment of the
moral majority who not only finance the system but are deliberately estranged from their individual
guaranteed Charter Rights.
Whereas the intent of the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 which recognizes the
supremacy of God is to establish the spirit in which the Constitution (Establishment) is to structure a
system consistent and conducive to a moral society where every individual is guaranteed equality of
protection and benefit in all matters before and under the law
These nincompoops or conspirators, whichever you prefer have in fact structured a team of legal
specialists, members of the Law Society of Upper Canada to implement the Constitution in a manner
profitable to all the members of the Society and in their enthusiasm lost track of their original
legitimate purpose which of course was to put an efficient legal system in place capable of maintaining
the spirit of the Law in the spirit of God in the spirit of the moral majority who finance them to do so
and by their avarice indulgence have created a team of backasswards, highly skilled at scoring on our
own net.
I have presented the evidence for the distinct purpose of getting them the puck out of here and to put
personnel in place coherent to the Constitution intent to consistently score against the immoral until
they “cry uncle” After all that is what they are paid and authorized to do. Right?
86
subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a
free and democratic society.
In a free and democratic society every individual is responsible for their own actions and must be
consistently in the spirit and in compliance with the Law and as a whole must decide what is
justifiable. A Public Inquiry is demanded to determine what is justifiable
The government (Establishment) has not demonstrated a modus operandi capable of backing the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and in fact the evidence I have provided has demonstrated their
established modus operandi is precisely contrary to their legitimate purpose to structure a system
consistent with the spirit of the Constitution to protect and benefit the people of a moral society where
each individual is presumed moral and in compliance with the spirit of the Constitution until such time
as evidence is provided to the authority having jurisdiction of ones non compliance whereas every
effort must be made in the spirit of the Law to substantiate the veracity of the accusation and the
preliminary evidence.
Where there exists a victim there most definitely exists a perpetrator and any evidence relative to the
circumstance linking one to the crime must be scrutinized for validity and any interference to the
initiative of discerning the truth is inconsistent with the intent of the spirit of the Law and in fact
obstruction of Justice.
Due consideration must be given to the priority stated or implied by the guarantee itself where due
diligence to the support of the guarantee must be irreproachably applied with fortitude and conviction,
FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith whereas the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms are contingent on the presumption one is in consistent compliance with the Law and where
evidence is presented to the authority of jurisdiction suggesting one has acted to the contrary the
presumption has been compromised and they are called upon to cooperate in the spirit of the Law to
demonstrate they are of the spirit of the Law where any demonstration to the contrary is to the
detriment of the spirit of the Law and the people who finance the entire system.
It is prudent to mention that the Federal Government personnel are representatives of the people who
must be irreproachable to the spirit of the Constitution and the money they spend is the people’s and
they must be able to demonstrate a modus operandi capable of assuring the money is used efficiently
and effectively as per the intent.
A person accused of a crime supported by reasonable evidence is obliged to cooperate in the spirit of
the Law and the people and failure to do so is obstruction of Justice and adds to the expense of
achieving Justice which is inherently passed on to the people depriving them of their money and right
to efficient effective Justice implicating the alleged further distancing them from their pure
uncompromised legitimate guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.
If logical recourse consistent with the evidence provided against them is to search their premises or any
personal property they must permit it or be charged with obstruction of Justice.
One must ask why they would object if they were of the spirit of the Law which they must be to be in
compliance with the Law and most particularly what would they have to hide other than implicating
evidence.
Any evidence acquired in the investigation implicating them to other crimes must be held against them
to which they must be brought to court to answer for.
87
The Law isn’t a game for the lawyers to play and profit from but an entity financed by the people to
assure their guarantee of protection and benefits are indeed guaranteed as provided by the Constitution.
Anyone who has committed a crime against anyone has committed a crime against the people who
ultimately finance the whole damn system and such a person is a detriment to the whole of society
where due diligence must be applied to rehabilitation and bringing them on side with the spirit of the
Law and the people of the moral society guarantied by the Federal Government being the people.
Persistence must be to nipping immorality in the bud and to that endeavor the Law must be initiated at
home where the parents must be held responsible for their children until they reach the legal age where
the administers and enforcers of the Law take over responsibility.
The Law is the spirit of society as a whole where the government (establishment) has been assigned the
responsibility to act representative of the people and due diligence is demanded to ensure they act
responsibly consistent with and conducive to the spirit of the Constitution and the spirit of the people
whose lives and well being and the state of the nation are dependent on their adeptness to the task being
number one in priority of initiatives mandatory to the government establishment financed and entrusted
to administer and enforce the Law consistently in the spirit of the Law and the people, where every
individual is equal in all matters of Law where the right to vote is irrelevant as a major number of these
individuals are prohibited from voting due to age and these people are wholly dependent on
government personnel doing their jobs in respect of their individual guaranteed Charter Rights and
Freedoms as well as the guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedom of all the people who do vote which
Charter rights are equally the same irrelevant to the opinions of the elected representatives who are
mandated to represent all the people equally in matters of their equal individual guaranteed Charter
rights.
Any government personnel who acts in non compliance with the Law does so on his or her own
personal initiative and are responsible for their own actions and will not be defended by the Federal
Government which is the people and all contracts of entitlements of employment to provide service to
the people and society as a whole are null and void upon conviction and where evidence has been
submitted to a government department having jurisdiction in such matters of a government employees
non compliance with the Law it is incumbent upon such department to commence or cause to
commence appropriate proceedings to determine the truth and upon conviction every effort must be
made to recover all benefits paid to such person from the earliest date of which such person was found
guilty to have committed.
The individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms are a fixed entity attached as an arm or a leg
with no restrictions in continuity commencing at the time of enactment of the Constitution in 1982 to
perpetuity where no government personnel has any legitimate authority to negate at any time without
the support of the people they are obliged to represent in the spirit of the Law they are bound to adhere
to and provide service to the people consistent with and conducive to their guaranteed individual
Charter rights.
I am of the opinion it is the Prime Minister of Canada who has the ultimate responsibility to assure the
government personnel are adept to the responsibility of backing the guarantee to each and every
individual as guaranteed and defined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms whereas he has
been granted the trust and authority by the people of Canada to act consistent with and conducive to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights which are fixed, not to be debated nor a matter of his opinion or
anyone else’s as they are clearly defined and to be observed in the spirit of the Law and the spirit of
God which preceded him.
The individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights are fundamental to the Constitution and the very spirit
which Canada is founded on and it is incumbent upon every government personnel financed in the
88
service of our Country and the people to ensure due diligence to the guarantee.
Where evidence has been provided to the authority of jurisdiction it is incumbent upon them to present the
evidence to the alleged and bring them before the courts immediately to account for his or hers treasonable
actions where the only evidence he or she can present is he or she did initiate appropriate action as required to
maintain the continuity of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
The responsibility to back the Federal Government’s Charter guarantee to the individual is ultimately the
responsibility of the people themselves who have entrusted their elected representatives to spend the people’s
money efficiently and effectively consistently in the spirit of the Constitution in the spirit of the people where
each individual’s Charter rights are one and the same with each other of the Constitution of fixed value for
perpetuity. Evidence must be presented to the people: Public Inquiry
I reiterate the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are fixed stable in continued perpetuity no matter which
way the wind blows, no matter who is elected to power and where seemingly interrupted by any authority are not
and can not be and any person or persons artificially interrupting one’s guaranteed Charter rights will be charged
to compensate for damages and costs incurred including time and effort
endured along with mental anguish and other such detriments with the person or person’s responsible
made to pay from their own pockets whereas they acted on their own accord without legal authority
inconsistent with and non conducive to the Law they were obliged and sworn to uphold.
Due the seriousness of such an offense leaving the stability of the Constitution and the sanctity of the people’s
individual guaranteed Charter rights blowing in the wind it is incumbent upon the authorities having jurisdiction
in such matters to attend to the matter FFF where the person or person’s must be immediately relieved from duty
and immediately replaced with a responsible competent person adept to purpose.
To be clear the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights have nothing to do with politics yet where reasonable
evidence is brought forward of a political person being negligent in his or her duties in respect of an individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights it is a crime against all the people and the Constitution itself whereas one individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights are equal to every individual’s rights and every individual pays the consequence
directly or indirectly whether it be due the weakness of the system allowed to continue detrimental to their odds
of protection and unlikely assurance of equal benefit and of course we taxpayers suffer to the inevitable
consequences.
The Constitution (Establishment) is structured in accordance with the Constitution (Document) and the
government personnel know the chain of authority and who ever assigns limited authority to the various
departments and agencies retains all the responsibility obliged by the Federal Government to structure a system
consistent with and conducive to the support of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights which does not
preclude them of any responsibility of their assigns for ultimately they are responsible to ensure the right people
are in place competent to the purpose assigned.
RCMP Commissioner William Elliot and the Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP
will give due regard to this document as they carry out their duties in accordance with the Constitution
(Document) with the same due regard to
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
Whereas no one has limited authority to act in support of the Law in the spirit and of the spirit consistent with
and conducive to the moral society guaranteed to each individual under the Charter and it is your sworn duty to
uphold the Constitution and bring the evidence before the people for their decision as to whether the arbitrary
actions of the government personnel employed to administer and enforce the Constitution and back the guarantee
equally to every Canadian individual is demonstrably justifiable.
PUBLIC INQUIRY warranted and demanded.
There are no arbitrary time limits or specific procedures to hinder me in pursuant of my guaranteed
individual Charter rights for they belong to me in perpetuity and any such measures introduced by any
government personnel are indicative of their true intent not supportive of the individual’s guaranteed
Charter rights. All delays have been due to them. 89
I highly suspect this presentation of mine exposing the government conspiracy initiated by members of
the Law Society of Upper Canada is not common to usual complaints forwarded to you people to study
and given the extreme significance relative to the well being and benefits of the Canadian Individual’s
and the improbability of an unbiased approach to the review of the evidence and the certain probability
the alleged conspirators will have implemented purportedly legal procedures to appear as if the issues
were dealt with FFF, Forthright, Forthcoming and Forthwith I request in such circumstance you review
such arbitrary laws and policies with respect to their consistency with the Constitution ensuring they
are conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.
I remind you the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights are fixed in perpetuity, nothing to be debated
and yet the modus operandi of the illegitimate legal system implemented by the government authorities
and practiced by the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada is designed to their benefit where
the odds against Justice being administered are higher than that of winning at the Casino or a Lottery.
This is evidenced in the correspondence between myself and the Law Society of Upper Canada where
if they had been FFF it would have taken them 2 or 3 days at most in sane manner to review the
evidence I presented them to know the particular lawyer I complained about was anything but that
which is required of him to act in a manner consistent with and conducive to my guaranteed Charter
rights in an endeavor to see Justice served.
When you review the Law Society of Upper Canada document which is to be found in 2 Parts by
clicking on the links near the top of the web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms you will
note the efforts I made and length of time it took to have them address the issue effectively and
efficiently due the simplicity of the complaint and how after all the time they wasted the issue remains
unattended to.
The document is clearly indicative of the injustice that can be expected in the courts and throughout the
legal system operated by their members where they made every effort not to address the issue and
evidence tabled attentive to support the integrity of their member and in so doing without effort to my
benefit provided me the irrefutable evidence of their nature not being compatible to administer and
enforce the Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution (Document)
There was no possible way for them to account for the lawyer’s actions and their persistence not to
address the issues is consistent with those of the government personnel I addressed the relative issues
which I have presented to you.
I have written many times in the documents I have provided you the Law Society of Upper Canada
have either stated or implied in the said correspondence that they do not give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights and their members only obligation is to vigorously advance the
interests of their clients, alias the people who can afford their services.
May I suggest they have a particularly bad attitude as their members set out to administer and enforce
Justice consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s Charter rights?
You will find throughout the Law Society document a simple question regarding the acquisition of a
copy of a contract the lawyer purported to have and since we are on the subject and it is pertinent to the
issues I have raised I request you acquire a copy of the said contract and enter it into evidence.
Is that too much to ask since I have no authority and by no coincidence the RCMP do.
90
I do expect under the auspices of the Constitution (Document) that all retrievable evidence will be
seeked and analyzed in pursuant of the truth where obvious omissions is contra productive to purpose.
Did you know in legal surveying which I spent 40 years at, all evidence found in support of or against
my decisions must be clearly noted on the face of the survey plan.
I will expect you both to respond to all the issues and the WHYs questioned in the Mad Glad mostly
Sad…Why? .doc which is to be found in the vicinity of the 2 Part, Law Society of Upper Canada
document on the aforesaid web site.
For your convenience I am also sending a copy of the Mad along with this document as an attachment.
There is another matter of relative importance which I request you address which government
personnel have refused to respond to.
The term “Threshold” has been used by YRP Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge and Sgt. Randy Craig OPP
Anti-Rackets to define an arbitrary line which purportedly legitimately deprives me of my right to
Justice and I expect you to question them to ascertain their intent as to the use of the word which they
have concluded my evidence didn’t toe the line.
I can guarantee you more assuredly than you can guarantee me my Charter rights are being protected
that a PUBLIC INQUIRY will be held one way or another and it would be prudent of you both to apply
yourselves to this endeavor FFF with attentiveness to due diligence to the most serious nature of this
exercise.
Should either of you have difficulty retrieving the evidence from my web site or require more
information I will be only too happy to accommodate and I request you do not hesitate to ask.
Perchance you are of good intentions I ask you to understand and forgive my attitude which has
acquiesced over the 2 ½ year trek so far to Justice not yet in sight.
I remind you there can be no legitimate arbitrary protocol set out to hinder my guaranteed Charter right
to Justice and there can be no limit to your authority to see that I get it.
52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with
the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.
All that stands in the way is you …as Confucius says
“To know what is right, and not do it, is want of courage, or of principle”
Face it now or die a thousand deaths ….something like that and I don’t know who to attribute
it to but I do know who it concerns.
Me too, but I will die but once, one way or another and I prefer a surprise.
We all have our druthers but what will be will be.
Frank Gallagher
91
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and
democratic society.
3. Every citizen of Canada has the right to vote in
2. Everyone has the following fundamental an election of members of the House of Commons
freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and or of a legislative assembly and to be qualified for
religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion membership therein.
and expression, including freedom of the press 7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security
and other media of communication; (c) freedom of the person and the right not to be deprived
of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of thereof except in accordance with the principles of
association. fundamental justice.
12. Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and
equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
The Federal Government enacted the Constitution Act, 1982 guaranteeing every individual
of Canada Charter Rights and Freedoms where it is ultimately their responsibility to structure a legal
system with competent irreproachable personnel with fortitude and conviction to administer and enforce
the Law consistent with and conducive to the Constitution whereas the individual is the most precious
commodity and the very backbone of the Constitution where each individual is responsible to conform
and abide by the spirit of the Constitution, the supreme Law of Canada which recognizes the supremacy
of God establishing the spirit to be that of a moral society where it is incumbent upon each individual to
respect the equal rights of every individual in Canada.
The concept couldn’t be simpler; after all we are all human beings with the same needs to sustain life.
Do not do to others Do unto others

What you do not want done to yourself As you would have them do unto you
Recompense injury with justice, and recompense kindness with kindness

Credence must be given to that which is least likely to be mistaken by man
That’s it, too simple, eh? That’s the spirit of the Law and yet the administers and enforcers don’t get it
WHY?
Bully, gang like mentality, a phenomenon which takes over when people get together in numbers.
Members of the Law Society of Upper Canada and associates are behind it all.
Because they are human beings, that’s WHY. Ignorant human beings who refuse to grow up
The Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert Nicholson is a major player
Ultimately the Prime Minister Stephen Harper is responsible and must be held accountable.
92
How can such a miscarriage of justice be allowed to exist in a democracy where God is supreme?
I have presented evidence collected over 2 ½ years and the obvious analysis of it to the RCMP who have
to date November 27 2007 not been able to get their heads together as they have been caught up by the
befuddlement of circumstance as have we all.
When the obvious is not obvious there is something obviously wrong which happens to be the obvious.
The following is my analysis of the evidence and unbiased observation of the government personnel who
are mandated to administer and enforce the Law in Canada.
The story is true as are the facts which are to be found by clicking on link
http://guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms.googlegroups.com/web/Mad
%20Glad%20mostly%20Sad%20WHY.doc
This document is a digest of my quest for justice as per common sense and that defined as my guaranteed
right as a Canadian individual as provided by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms where many
obvious questions surfaced per circumstance providing obvious reason to investigate WHY I was not
getting the justice that belonged to me as per the guarantee granted me by the Federal Government in
1982.
The more I queried the more there was to query until eventually it became abundantly obvious the
government personnel at all levels of government didn’t give a damn about my individual guaranteed
Charter rights which culminated into one humungous WHY?
Sure, I was nobody special and far from it and a whole lot more annoying to the government
personnel because I refused to accept their indifferent attitude to my guaranteed rights.
Upon conversation and correspondence with various members of the York Regional Police fraud unit I
became aware that what has happened to me has happened over and over again to many others so much
so that the police have used their experience to determine what evidence and circumstance meets the
“threshold” to be able to proceed before the courts.
I found it somewhat discerning that two detectives I met with, Sgt. Fred Kerr and Cpl. George Rorke
stated that they could take similar evidence to a judge and one time a warrant will be granted and another
time denied and yet they didn’t bother taking my evidence for a warrant. They mentioned how often they
were frustrated by the courts and the immediate thought comes to mind as to why they are frustrated?
Are they just too ignorant to investigate the evidence to a proper conclusion or is it a problem with the
judge?
They also informed me I could take the matter to civil court but my lawyer would be negligent if he
didn’t inform me the odds of being reimbursed for my losses are slim.
Obviously if they felt they couldn’t get a warrant with many years experience dealing with the law my
chances was slim and foolish to throw good money after bad.
But wait a minute, what happened to my guarantee? My right not to be deprived. My equal right
to justice
15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection
and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination
based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
I can not even begin to imagine where the evidence I provided was lacking because every base was
covered. What was this arbitrary “threshold”? Nobody would respond to me.
93
I persistently wrote the YRP until Insp. Michael Fleming agreed to meet with me where he remained
steadfast with the original decision but agreed with me that it didn’t make sense but that’s “How it is”
He offered that’s the first thing they learn when they become cops that the law has nothing to do with
common sense which I agreed at the time but after an analysis of all the evidence using common sense I
have come to know for fact that it is not the Law that has nothing to do with common sense but the
administers and enforcers of it who are estranged from reality.
Nobody wanted to give me a written report though as to why the YRP wouldn’t investigate but through
persistence of written requests for a response I received one from Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge who
responded January 10 2006 using that word “threshold” again. See Lawyer File # 9 pages 19 & 20
I have written a prodigious number of times since requesting some answers to obvious questions such as
the meaning of the term “threshold” in reference to my situation which fell short to commence
proceedings and other obvious questions referenced above to no avail.
I never heard from them again until September 6 2006 when Phil Moreau of the Standards Branch of the
YRP phoned and talked for an hour discussing the Black Book dated September 1 2006 which I had
faxed Deputy Chief Bruce Herridge on September 5 2006.
I wrote Phil Moreau immediately after he hung up recapping our conversation but he never responded
On October 10 2006 Karen Knoakes # 440 Executive Officer of Public Complaints responded with
typical inane rhetoric I have come to know which does not address the issues or answer my questions and
then directed me to the Ontario Civilian Commission on Police Services should I not be satisfied with her
response.
I had 30 days from October 14 2006 the day I received it to do so but thought it a futile venture
presuming they would not address the issues or answer the questions either but after meeting with
Sergeant Randy Craig OPP Anti-Rackets on November 14 2006 and his decline to take a preponderance
of evidence I brought him for the OPP to review and some of the comments he made I realized I was into
one humongous government conspiracy. See Lawyer File # 8.
When I got home that day I decided to assemble the evidence to present to the Ontario Civilian
Commission on Police Services which I drove town to deliver the following day November 15 2006 with
just one day to spare to make the deadline of 30 days.
They did as expected routinely acknowledging they had reviewed the evidence without addressing it or
answering any of the obvious questions and cited me section so and so and the file is accordingly closed.
See Lawyer File # 10
All 15 Lawyer Files and others can be found on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-
law-society including the 2 Part Toronto Sun document which irrefutably proves the crimes were
committed and the various government agencies and departments and YRP were involved in the
conspiracy.
The evidence speaks for itself.

Of course it has yet to have the chance to speak to a legitimate capable investigative authority which acts
FFF with integrity conviction and fortitude consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights.
I have to admit the evidence doesn’t irrefutably prove the YRP and Commission are in on the conspiracy
but they are consistent with it and most certainly are inept to enforce the Law, the Constitution.
94
They are however persistently stubborn and ignorant as I have come to know the majority of government
personnel to be having spent 40 years in Legal Surveying beginning 10 years with the province and
ending with 14 years with the City of Toronto Property Management Surveys where I had joined them in
May 1990 leaving my manager position of a survey company in the private sector.
Government personnel tend to learn through observation and hand me downs acquiesced through time
generation to generation where they are reluctant to change not having full grasp as to what they are
actually intended to achieve. In matters of Law they can be huge pains in the asses as they can not relate
to anything other than “ this is how we’ve always done it” and they can at anytime produce a number of
well respected personnel to affirm their position.
In general I stood alone against them, me and the law that is which makes a decidedly huge difference
which I came to know early in my career.
I have no doubt the majority wanted to do what was right, they just didn’t know what was right and felt
comfort in numbers all believing they must be right because they have always done it this way or that.
It is somewhat exacerbating at times but you get use to their ignorance and eventually the word gets
around that I was right. I would never sign the notes unless I had investigated all the evidence thoroughly
and knew for a fact my final decision was consistent with the laws and every property owner got
precisely what they were entitled to by law.
I have had quite an extensive career and met all types and there was even the odd fool supervisor who
would tell me to change my notes and move a couple of survey stakes even after I pointed out a few
oversights. Just plain stubborn but after I realized he was not receptive to reasoning I would say okay
then you are the boss, and write a note in my report that so and so instructed me to do so and so against
my advice and demand he sign it. Always like the arrogant spoiled useless whatever they are off in a huff
and a puff and leave it my way, the right way according to law, common sense and according to the way
it was originally intended with everyone getting precisely what they bought and paid for.
So it’s not my first time at bat with such ignorance surrounding me but I must confess never has there
been so many against me but in the bye and bye it is the Law that counts and I am only the messenger.
Even though the incidences occurred in Ontario and the government personnel cited Ontario law which
they have come accustomed to and support each other in using them, they themselves are breaking the
Law, the supreme law of Canada where every individual is equal in all matters before and under the law
where
So inadvertently, through stubbornness, ignorance, incompetence and unwillingness to study the Law
or heed my writings have remained steadfast exactly where the conspirators wanted them adverse to the
spirit of the Law, the spirit of God and the spirit of the intended moral society to the benefit of the
immoral and the conspirators detrimental to the moral majority and their guaranteed Charter rights.
There is no readily available statistics for the numbers of victims caused by their ineptness to administer
and enforce the laws of Ontario consistent with the Constitution conducive to the individual’s guaranteed
rights nor is their any evidence of common sense being utilized by the various levels of administration
and enforcement as the evidence attests.
There is very convincing evidence of what I have come to know and stated of the government personnel.
95
Common Sense Evolution
Please give your heads a shake, read carefully every word and think for God’s sake.
It is the immoral that is the enemy of the moral society promised by the Constitution
The guy without the evidence against him is definitely the good guy in any given case presented to you.
Ask yourselves how anyone can be expected to abide by the Law if it doesn’t make sense?
On page 1 I have copied some excerpts from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. What
is there that doesn’t make sense?
If the members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are not required to give a damn about the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and these people administer and enforce the Law what are
the chances of an individual getting justice in their courts? Where’s the sense?
How can they be allowed to administer and enforce the Law inconsistently and adverse to the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights? Where’s the sense?
If the Prime Minister is the legal representative of the people in the Constitution of Canada would
he not be obliged to ensure the government personnel are up to the challenge of administering and
enforcing the Law consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights
and Freedoms in respect of the people who elected him to represent them?
Who has more power than he and assuredly he has the eyes and ears of the media to do whatever it
takes to eradicate the government conspiracy against the people?
So having been provided the evidence why would he not use his authority for the people unless he
was in on the conspiracy?
Why would he enact the Federal Accountability Act if he didn’t know the government personnel
were irresponsible and unaccountable whereas all government personnel are responsible to do
their jobs as well as any person in the private sector?
Why wouldn’t they be held even more responsible and accountable when they are financed by the
people to do a most serious job which their lives, safety and well being are dependent on?
What chance does the individual have of accessing his individual guaranteed Charter rights when
the whole damn government doesn’t give a damn about the individual unless he finds a way to
organize the people in support?
Why should the individual need do anything other than submit his claim that his rights have been
compromised along with the evidence? After all he was guaranteed not to be deprived, Right?
What in hell kind of people are they who side with the immoral against the intended moral society?
Why wouldn’t the government be required to demonstrate due diligence to putting a modus
operandi in place consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights?
96
Why do you suppose lawyers and politicians are low on the trust list and do you see any reason at
all they should be trusted?
Who in the Federal Government is responsible to back the guarantee of the individual’s Charter
rights If not the Prime Minister who appoints the Minister of Justice and the Attorney General of
Canada?
The Prime Minister appointed Mary Dawson as Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest
and Louis Theoret as Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime and Stockwell Day as Minister of
Public Safety and Vic Toews as President of the Treasury…formerly Minister of Justice. Right?
I am thinking he has great influence in the government goings on….Doncha Think?
Why does the government frown on whistleblowers who are only trying to help?
Why is it that when one party accuses another of wrong doings the party retorts with the wrong
doings of the accusor when they were in power?
Why is this allowed to go on and on?
Why is it all about politics and not the well being of the Canadian people?
Why do I get responses from the police “that this is just how it is”?
I know how it is and am complaining “How it is” is not “How it is supposed to be” by the Charter
Obviously I could go on for hours asking questions but it is my deliberate intent to get you, the
Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP and the RCMP Commissioner in the spirit
due the seriousness of the occasion.
You do see the very serious nature of the issues don’t you?
You at the very least see the necessity to appear as if you see the serious nature don’t you?
You do understand how important even the lowliest of us consider our individual guaranteed
Charter Rights and Freedoms?
You do understand common sense and its importance relative to the Law and how important the
necessity of a modus operandi adept to the support of the individuals Charter Rights and
Freedoms.
You do understand the significance of evidence and the necessity of a competent legal system
consistent with the Constitution and conducive to the justice of an individual’s guaranteed Charter
Rights.
You do see that it is the Federal Government who enacted the Constitution Act, 1982 and it their
responsibility to back the guarantee having accepted financial benefit to do so making it binding?
You do know they are responsible for their assigns. Right?
97
You do know there is only one legitimate way to deal with the issues, don’t you?
You do know how serious I take this and will do so until my eventuality?
You do know the time is well over due to make things right, consistent with the Law and a moral
society. Right?
Well all that remains is to wait and see.
Why not use the time in the right attitude doing your job to make things right consistent with the
Law, the spirit of God and the people of a moral society?
The people just want to live the life they are entitled to and it is the responsibility of the police to
see that they get it.
The Law is not complicated when common sense is applied where God is supreme
Everyone knows the meaning of these words except thieves and lawyers who set out ambiguous laws
beneficial to the immoral minority which they argue out in court for the lawyers benefit all at the expense
of the tax payer to the detriment of the victims and a moral society.
The government personnel has been structured and financed by the people to efficiently and cost
effectively provide the necessities of a moral society whereas immorality is a blight and it is priority one
to the guarantee of the Charter to structure a system attentive to the eradication of immoral inclination
where it is incumbent upon the government personnel to ensure staff is irreproachable to that endeavor.
This is fundamental to the Law where every individual is guaranteed equal Rights and Freedoms as
provided by the Federal Government in the Charter and they must be held responsible and accountable to
back the guarantee.
It is the responsibility of every individual to understand and obey the Law of the country and I reiterate
there can be no words clearer to define the Law than the words of Jesus who was most informed of the
aspirations attributed to God where the supreme law of Canada recognizes the supremacy of God..
Confucius
Shall I teach you what knowledge is? When you know a thing, to hold that you know it; and when
you do not know a thing, to allow that you do not know it. This is knowledge.
Do not do to others
C o n f u c iu s
5 5 1 B– 4C7 9 B C
What you do not want done to yourself
Recompense injury with justice, recompense kindness with kindness
98
You do not have to be religious to understand in fact one is more likely to understand if they are not a
religious fanatic for the message is clear and true to a moral society where often is the case religious
fanatics are prepared to follow the leader into war precisely contrary to the ideology.
“The people may be made to follow a course of action, but they may not be made to understand it”
“Learning without thought is labor lost, thought without learning is perilous”
The Obvious needs tending to
You can get to the east by going west but the shortest route is how the crow flies point to point
The members of the Law Society of Upper Canada are not required to give a damn about the individual’s
guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms and they are only obliged to vigorously advance the interests of
their clients.
How in hell can these people serve a moral society governed by the Constitution the supreme Law of
Canada which recognizes the supremacy of God where the federal Government has guaranteed
every individual equality in all matters before and under the Law as provided by the Charter.
It is incomprehensible that the police allow such absurdity of adversity to the Constitution and the
promised moral society which is the Federal government’s responsibility is to back the guarantee made to
every individual of Canada.
Every initiative must be directed to replace the incompetent irresponsible arrogant government personnel
with the prerequisite competent responsible personnel consistent with and conducive to the support of the
individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights which is FUNDAMENTAL to the foundation of the Constitution
and what Canadians stand for.
Idiotacracy must be immediately replaced Idealacracy
Where due diligence in sane format is mandatory to the serious nature of the Idealogy
The present Federal Government personnel are in Conflict of Interest to administer and enforce the Law
consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights and Freedoms.
99
Under the Federal Accountability Act, 2006 Mary Dawson has been appointed Commissioner of Ethics
and Conflict of Interest and has been mandated with the responsibility to address relative complaints and
as a citizen of Canada I hereby file a complaint with the Commissioner against the Federal Government
personnel referenced within my writings and published on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms who by their
actions documented therein are in conflict of interest of the moral society guaranteed by the Constitution
(Document).
The irrefutable evidence published on my web site http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society
Ultimately the responsibility to back the guarantee of the Charter is with the Federal Government and I
have provided the evidence to the Prime Minister Stephen Harper, the Minister of Justice and Attorney
General of Canada and the Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day who have declined to act responsibly
in appropriate manner consistent with the Constitution and in fact have demonstrated their persistence in
continuity of inane rhetoric conducive to a government conspired against the people in Conflict of
Interest of the foundation of Canada, the Constitution and the well being of every individual guaranteed
Charter rights.
Commissioner Mary Dawson

Commissioner of Ethics and Conflict of Interest
Federal Government.
I hereby request you study my complaints addressed in the aforesaid web sites and take appropriate
action to bring the pertinent government personnel on side with the law whereas a PUBLIC INQUIRY
is mandatory given the befuddlement of circumstance.
Your immediate attention is required
Thank you
Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
PS
Should you have any difficulty accessing the evidence from the web sites or should you require further
evidence or understanding pleas do not hesitate to contact me at franklyone@hotmail.com
The face of justice must be identified and made to face justice in pursuant of justice for all
100

Now If I Find A Stamp I Can Save The World Nov.6.09

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Now If I Find A Stamp I Can Save The World Nov.6.09

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

November 6 2009 Charter Democracy Force Justice Inc.

34 Riverglen Drive, Keswick, On L4P 2P8

T/F 905-476-8959 Cell 904-251- 1413

Re: Your Report on my evidence

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms

Do you know what a guarantee is Bob?

Guarantee: Assurance, promise, pledge, agreement, security, warranty, certification, undertaking

Go ahead Bob, you try one … maybe two

Okay then …. Bob … okay then.

I mean you cannot have a 2 Tier system Right?

Police Services Act R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER P.15

PoliceServicesAct.doc Declaration of principles

So Bob what are you gonna do?

It is inevitable whether or not they down me first.

Oh ya, and the rule of Law

publicly disclosed laws

Your side of the story is requested please.

Good then we will hear from you shortly

You will let us know if they bully you Eh?

Once in you can never get out

You can lead a horse to water, but cannot make it drink

It is reality that attests and begs the question

Democracy: social equality, equality, egalitarianism

It is the obviousness of their charlatan ways deliberately attentive to deception, prevarication,

Simplicity: Ease, straightforwardness, effortless, plainness, minimalism, unfussiness, cleanness

“2o bucks says we can have a True Democracy” 1 LIFE initiative.

Credos to the Astute Minority of the Moral Majority

112 Kent Street, 7th Floor

This document sent by registered mail is published on my Scribd site http://www.scribd.com/documents as

signed October 15 2009 18

Jack Santos responded October 19 2009

Excerpt from page 4 follows

False statements are underlined

1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

Commission for Public Complaints Against the RCMP

Reviews & Investigations Unit

E-MAIL ADDRESS: reviews@cpc-cpp.gc.ca

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

September 23 2008 Frank Gallagher

Re: Request Review of my Complaint

Dear Commission Representative

Police Services Act

Address of contents of Superintendent Robert Davis dated September 3 2008

False statements are underlined

1) Complaint date November 7 2007 in error (False-November 8 2007)

Police Services Act

From then on it was all about Government Organized Crime of

2) If I wish to exercise my right to a review of this investigation of my complaint I may do so by

Of course I wish to exercise my right!!!

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

M.J. Thomson, Sgt.

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

September 18, 2008

From: Frank Gallagher [mailto:frank.gallagher@sympatico.ca]

Attention Andree Leduc

Re: Request Review of Complaint

Dear Andree Leduc

Please acknowledge receipt and your intent to cooperate

Confucius 551 BC – 479 BC

Frank 1942 AD – 200_

Manager, Charter Democracy Force

When ones mandate is to meet with a person

Due diligence to a purpose when the safety