Professional Documents
Culture Documents
wells
Chérel L., Bruneau J.; Dubos-Sallée N., Labat K., Barthelemy J.F., Daniel J.M.
Summary
The description of fracture networks is a critical input for the building of reservoir models and
reservoir simulation. This paper presents the integration of the physical characteristics of fractures
defined in wells to interpret the azimuthal anisotropy of the amplitude of seismic signals.
The proposed method converts the well data into elastic tensors to compute anisotropic reflection
coefficients. Synthetic traces are then created by convolving the resulting reflection logs with source
wavelet. The comparison of the synthetic seismograms with real azimuthal seismic data is used to
evaluate the effect of fractures on these data. It turns out that taking into account the fractures in the
forward modelling has only a minor effect on the correlation between synthetic and real traces: the
variations observed between azimuthal sectors are strong and inconsistent with an anisotropic
behaviour. These variations are probably due to poor seismic quality or to other causes such as
layering or stress effects.
The description of fracture networks is a critical input for the building of reservoir models and
reservoir simulation. Seismic anisotropy, measured by azimuthal surface seismic or borehole seismic,
can be linked to fracture patterns provided the other sources of anisotropy have been properly
corrected for. Good knowledge of fracture characteristics can be obtained from well data including
cores, borehole imaging (FMI, UBI) and production logs. However this information remains localized
in the close vicinity of the wells. Most often, seismic anisotropy information and well data are only
qualitatively compared (Prioul and Jocker, 2009, Panien et al., 2009).
This paper presents the integration of the physical characteristics of the fractures detected in wells to
interpret the azimuthal anisotropy of the amplitude of the seismic signals in terms of parameters.
Triclinic elastic tensor elements are computed from well information to obtain the theoretical
anisotropic reflection coefficient profiles for several azimuths. Synthetic traces derived from these
reflections coefficient series can be subsequently used to evaluate the impact of fractures on the
anisotropy measured in real data.
Method
m Vp density Vs
x050 x050
x100 x100
x150 x150
0
315 45 x200 x200
270 90 x250
x250
( )
hom −1 ( )
4 1 −ν m2 P32i s s ν m n ⊗ n ⊗ n ⊗ n
−1
C hom
= S = s m + ∑
πEm (1 −ν m 2) i πRi2
n i ⊗1⊗ n i −
2 i i i i
(1)
where sm, Em and νm respectively denote the compliance tensor, Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio
of the medium, Ri, P32i and ni are the radius, density and normal vector of the ith fracture set, 1 the
=
s
second-order identity tensor, symbol ⊗ stand for the tensor product and ⊗ followed by a
symmetrization with respect to its two adjacent indices. As the size of fractures is generally unknown,
we choose to launch simulations considering several values of radii. This provides an anisotropic
macroscopic elastic tensor Chom.
x600
x650
x700
x750
AZ1
Figure 4: Definition of θ and λ angles. The AZ2
arrow represents the qP phase velocity vector.
AZ3
Results: Comparison between synthetic traces with anisotropy and real seismic traces
We can now compare the logs of the synthetic reflectivities to real 3D seismic traces in order to
measure the contribution of the anisotropy related to fracture parameters.
The comparison is performed for each available 3D azimuth seismic sector by using a 1D convolution
of the synthetic reflectivities with a unique wavelet. In this study, four azimuthal sectors of 45° and
two classes of incidence angles ("mid" between 20-30° and "far" between 30-40°) are available, i.e
eight data cubes plus one near offset full azimuth dataset (Figure 5). A synthetic log is associated with
each seismic partial stack. The comparison is made only in the time window corresponding to the
reservoir (about 150 ms) and with the seismic traces contained in a 21x21 bins surrounding the wells
considered. Our objective is here to measure the similarity of the synthetic and real traces by
determining the time shift and phase shift to obtain the best correlation coefficient. The delay and the
phase shift should be identical for all azimuth sectors.
This comparison has been performed between the synthetic anisotropic traces discussed above and
real data (top of figure 6), and also between the synthetic isotropic traces (as computed from the Aki
& Richards formula) and real data (bottom of figure 6). Top of figure 6 displays the optimal set of
fracture lengths leading to the best agreement between synthetic anisotropic traces and real data.
A strong difference in correlation is observed between the azimuthal sectors. The higher correlations
are not in same locations for each azimuth. These maps show the AZ2 mid sector, yields better results
than the AZ1 mid and AZ4 mid. The best correlation coefficients are obtained for the AZ4 far sector. .
These remarks hold for either anisotropic or isotropic synthetic traces: the correlation patterns are
similar in a given azimuth, but the correlation level is higher for the anisotropic calibration.
The variations observed between azimuths are not due to anisotropic modelling but could be due to
the variability of the signal-to-noise ratio related to the acquisition geometry or to the processing
sequence. These variations could also be due to local stress or to the layering. Anisotropy appears is a
second-order effect compared to reflectivity and noise level. The rapid variations observed on the
different panels could be explained by the short correlation window (150 ms) which is very sensitive
to the quality of the seismic data.
The correlation map for the near incidence data (not shown here) displays very low values due to the
low quality of the seismic stack and is identical for the isotropic and anisotropic cases. The near offset
modelling is created from rock density and sonic logs Vp, and does not take into account the
compliance created by fractures.
Conclusions
The description of fractures and sonic logs measured in wells make it possible to define via
homogenisation elastic tensors with triclinic anisotropy in depth intervals selected for their relative
homogeneity. These tensors allow use to compute reflectivity logs for all azimuths and synthetic
traces via a simple convolution with a wavelet. The resulting theoretical seismogram can be used to
confront the full azimuth seismic data with fracture data defined in well. Our study shows that
modelling accounting for anisotropy yields better results than isotropic modelling.. The comparison
opens up the possibility to quantitatively interpret seismic anisotropy observed in wide azimuth 3D
Mid
Far
Mid
Far
Figure 6: Correlation maps between seismic traces and synthetic (isotropic or anisotropic) traces at
the well which is located in the centre of the maps for four azimuths: AZ1 (0-45°) AZ2 (45-90°) AZ3
(90-135°) and AZ4 (135-180°) and for two incidence angles: mid (20-30°) and far (30-40°). Each
map is composed of 21 crosslines and 21 inlines. The colour scale indicates the correlation coefficient
between real traces and synthetic traces.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank GDFSuez and its partners for permission to publish this paper.
References
Aki, K. and Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology, Freeman and Co., New York.
Barthélémy, J.F., Guiton, M., and Daniel, J.M. [2008] Estimates of fracture density and uncertainties from well data. Int. J.
Rock Mech. Mining Sci., doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.08.003
Kachanov, M. [1993] Elastic solids with many cracks and related problems, Advances in applied mechanics, Volume 30, .
Academic press, 259-445,
Mensch, T. and Rasolofosaon, P. [1997] Elastic-wave velocities in anisotropic media of arbitrary symmetry - Generalization
of Thomsen's parameters ε, δ and γ, Geophys. J. Int., 128, 43-64.
Panien M., Portier E., Marcy F., Ghilardini L., Le Maux T., Dehaeck T., and Boulahia M. [2009] Fracture characterization: a
fully integrated study, from borehole imagery, cores and seismic data to production logs. Example of an Algerian Gas Field
4th North African/Mediterranean Petroleum and Geosciences Conference & Exhibition – TUNIS
Prioul, R. and Jocker, J., [2009] Fracture characterization at multiple scales using borehole images, sonic logs, and
walkaround vertical seismic profile. AAPG Bulletin, 93, 1503-1516.
Rasolofosaon, P., [2000] From transverse isotropy to arbitrary anisotropy for qP-waves in weakly anisotropic media,
Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Seismic Anisotropy (9IWSA), Houston.