You are on page 1of 86

-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

A Project Report on

“Customer satisfaction on global baroda hospital”


At
Manjalpur, Vadodara

Submitted to

The School of Management, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth

MBA
Submitted by
RIAZ AHEMAD
SM20092001
Under the Guidance of

Faculty Guide Company


Guide
Mr Rahul Sharma Mr. Pravin Kumar
Lecturer Marketing
Manager
School of Management Global Baroda
Hospital
Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Baroda
Piparia, Vadodara Gujarat

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

July, 2010

DECLARATION

I here by declare that the summer project report titled “To study the Customers Satisfaction in
Global Baroda Hospital” is an original piece of work done by me for the fulfillment of the award of
degree of Master of Business Administration. And whatever information has been taken from any
sources had been duly acknowledge.

I further declare that the personal data and information received from any respondent during survey
has not been shared with any one and is used for academic purpose only.

Riaz Ahemad

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

It is a fact that none of the human being in this world is 100% perfect and in order to gain
some perfection in itself an individual surely needs a helping hand. The same was with me with
respect to the project that I was undergoing during this session of 2 months. I selected for my
research at the initial stages, I got acquainted with it slowly and steadily through efforts and surely
from various intelligent and helpful personalities.

To start with, I would like to convey my gratitude to Mr Praveen Kumar, Marketing


Manager Global Baroda Hospital, for his co-operation. I would also thank the other entire
employees who work there and give me support during my project and training.

I personally would like to thanks my faculty coordinator Mr Rahul Sharma for assisting me
throughout the project period, guiding me and assisting at various stages and thus sharing his
valuable knowledge with me to enhance my knowledge and helping me in preparing a project. I
would also like to extend my thanks to all the respondents who spared their valuable time and
helped me in filling up the questionnaire by providing the needed information.

Lastly, I would like to thanks all of those who have helped to furnish this project
successfully.

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Riaz Ahemad

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report is for analysis of “To study customer satisfaction in Global Baroda Hospital,
Vadodara for the last 2 months. This report provides some recommendations for how to address
the quality services for Customer satisfaction.

In my project, I have used descriptive research methodology and convenience sampling


design. I have done Chi- Square Testing in my project work. I have done my data analysis on
SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) software. and factor analysis tests are studied to
know the whether there is a relationship between the customers satisfaction and Quality of services.
For this SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) software is used.

Most of the respondents prefer Quality services as an important Objectives. Most of the
respondents’ ages between 35-55 years are well aware about Quality of Services.

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

The finding of this survey would go a long way in helping the Indian Healthcare sectors for
better understand not only existing customer but also potential ones. The finding of the survey
would help Global Baroda Hospital to find new customer and to get new business.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter – 1 Page No

1.1 Why, Whom, Where, When and How. 7


1.2 Identifying the variables and parameters for the particular study. 9
Establish the theoretical relationship among variables.
1.3 Definition and Background information about the topic. 10
Chapter – 2 13

2.1 Company Profile, History

2.2 Growth & Development 15

2.3 Benchmark & Milestone 17

2.4 Who’s who 15

2.5 Industry Profile, Competitive Scenario 26

2.6 Market Share 27

2.7 Industry Life Cycle & Growth 28

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

2.8 Industry Spectrum. 29

2.9 Government Rules & Regulation. 33

3.1 Chapter – 3 Overview of Functional Area

3.2 Finance 35
3.3 Marketing 36
3.4 Human Resource 41
3.5 Operations 43
4.1 Chapter – 4 Model Application, Strategic Advantage Profile 52

4.2 Porter’s Five Forces Model 45

4.3 ETOP (Environmental Threat & Opportunity Profile). 56


4.4 BCG (Model). 54
4.5 Value Chain. 48
5.1 Chapter – 5 Research Methodology , Objectives and purpose 58
of the study

5.2 Scope of the study, Benefits of the study 59

5.3 Assumptions

5.4 Types of research design 59

5.5 Unit of Analysis 60

5.6 Methods of data Collection

5.7 Sampling if applicable

5.8 Reliability & Validity of the study 61

5.9 Appropriate tools for data analysis

6.0 Limitations of the study. 61

6 Chapter – 6 Data Collection & Analysis 62

7 Chapter – 7 Findings 73

8 Chapter – 8 Suggestions/Recommendations/Bibliography. 84

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Chapter – 1

Introduction:-
Services are becoming an increasingly important element of national economies and it is crucial to
appreciate the distinguishing qualities of services and resulting management implications with
specific focus on healthcare services. The delivery of quality healthcare services and the integration
of thereof in healthcare policies is a concern in various health organizations across the world. In the
past decade in particular, patient satisfaction has become an important performance measure and
outcome of healthcare. Research on healthcare satisfaction is vital to ensure a high quality of care
and patient satisfaction and to maximize the benefits of scarce resources. Thus determining the
factors associated with patient's satisfaction is critical for public healthcare providers in order to
understand what is valued by patients, how the quality of care is perceived by the patients and to
know where, when and how service changes and improvements could be made.

Why Organizations Focus on Customer Satisfaction:-


Businesses monitor customer satisfaction in order to determine how to increase their
customer base, customer loyalty, revenue, profits, market share and survival. Although
greater profit is the primary driver, exemplary businesses focus on the customer and his/her
experience with the organization. They work to make their customers happy and see
customer satisfaction as the key to survival and profit.
Customer satisfaction is tied directly to profitability, if your customers are happy, they
7

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

tend to be loyal. And if they are loyal they not only buy more, they refer other customers. Well
established research by Bain & Company found that, for many companies an increase of 5% in
customer retention can Increase profits b 25% to 29% . The same study found that it cost six to
seven times to gain a new customer than to keep an existing one.

When to Conduct Customer Satisfaction Research:-

Many managers wonder how frequently they should conduct customer satisfaction surveys. The
answer depends on the size of the customer base and the purpose of research. There are two key
types of surveys and they very different purposes.
Transactional surveys solicit feedback directly from the product or service user about that
particular encounter. They are conducted immediately after each customer transaction. For
example, a survey may be administered after a call center experience. Transactional surveys are
sent out at the discretion of whoever has contact with customers—but the data should be collected
immediately after the interaction while the experience is still fresh in the customer’s mind.
How Many Customers to Survey:-
If your company has more than 2000 customers and it is not economically feasible to survey all of
them, you can survey a subset. In this case you will need to consider the following concepts
relating to sample selection and accuracy of results.
Random Selection:-
First, it is essential that a random selection of customers be contacted to avoid introducing
Bias into how the customers were selected and to help ensure the sample of customers is
Representative of the entire customer base. For example if a company surveyed only customers who
Contacted customer service, those individual may be very different from customers who have
not contacted customer service.
Margin of Error:-
Next you need to establish the level of precision you want to have in the accuracy of the results. The
margin of error also known as a confidence interval is an indicator of sample
Accuracy for random samples. It is the plus or minus figure that is commonly reported with
News polls. Such as plus or minus four points in a customer satisfaction example if the reported result is
80% satisfaction with a 4 –point margin of error, that means the true answer
is somewhere between 76% (80-4)and 84%(80+4) assuming the whole population of customers had been
asked. The larger the sample size, the more accurate the result(or the smaller the confidence interval)

Confidence Level:-
Then you need to determine how certain you want to be that the survey result are within the
Margin of error. The confidence level indicates the level of certainty that the survey results are within
the confidence interval for random samples. Typically researcher use 95% confidence level.
Together the confidence level and margin of error together describe the certainty you have in the
8

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

precision of the data . For example for a reported result of 80% satisfaction at the 95%
Confidence level with a 4-point margin of error, you can say that you are 95% certain that
Percentage of satisfied customers is between 76% and 84%.
The table below outlines the sample sizes needed for different customer bases at varying level
Of accuracy at the 95% confidence level.

Sample Size Needed


(95% Confidence
Level)
Size of Customer Base
+/-3% +/-5% +/-10
2,000 696 323 92
3,000 788 341 94
5,000 880 357 95
10,000 965 370 96
20,000 1,014 377 96
50,000 1,045 382 96
100,000 1,058 383 96

Another important consideration in determining the sample size is how much analysis will need to
be done on groups of customers .To analyze customers in particulars or
Regions, the sample size should be adjusted to at least 75 people in each group.

How to Distribute Your Survey:-


The best means of distributing a survey depends on whether it is a transactional or relationship
survey. A transactional survey is conducted at the point of customer contact. Depending on the
nature of the customer contact, an in –person, telephone
Or online survey may be appropriate.
Relationship survey , on the other hand are most cost-effectively conducted online.

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Service Quality in Public Healthcare:-


Grönroos (1984) was the first who attempted to define and explain service quality and
differentiated between the process of delivery (functional quality), which relates to the perceived
quality and the actual output of the service (technical quality), which relates to objective quality.
Technical quality in healthcare is the accuracy of diagnosis and procedures and functional quality
refers to the manner of delivery of healthcare.
Firstly, services have fewer search qualities that can easily be assessed before a use or purchase.
Healthcare is characterized by high involvement of the consumers due to the higher risk in terms of
outcomes, yet it requires the complete involvement of these customers during the service
production and delivery process. This implies that the quality of the process and outcome is of
equal importance.
Secondly services tend to exhibit more experience qualities that can only be assessed after use,
such as the quality of medical consultation and treatment resulting in better health.
Lastly services tend to exhibit more credence qualities that consumers may have difficulty
assessing, even after the purchase, because they may not have the necessary knowledge or
experience. For instance, even after undergoing an operation, a patient may be unable to assess
whether the quality of service received was good or not.
Quality within healthcare service delivery refers to services that meet set standards, implying
excellence, and satisfy the needs of both consumers and health -care practitioners in a way that
adds significant meaning to both parties healthcare experiences. Internationally, healthcare quality
is a still a concern as reflected by the various studies published recently. The most popular model
of service quality is SERVQUAL, a set of structured and paired questions designed to assess
customers’ expectations of service provision and the customers’ perceptions of what was actually
delivered. This instrument is structured in five dimensions, namely: Tangibles, Reliability,
Responsiveness, Assurance, Empathy.
2. Definition & Background Information:-

What is Customer Satisfaction?


The definition of customer satisfaction has been widely debated as organizations increasingly
attempt to measure it. Customer satisfaction can be experienced in a variety of situations and
connected to both goods and services. It is a highly personal assessment that is greatly affected
by customer expectations. Satisfaction also is based on the customer’s experience of both
contact with the organization (the “moment of truth” as it is called in business literature) and
personal outcomes. Some researchers define a satisfied customer within the private sector as

10

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

“one who receives significant added value” to his/her bottom line—a definition that may apply
just as well to public services.
Customer satisfaction differs depending on the situation and the product or service. A
customer may be satisfied with a product or service, an experience, a purchase decision, a
salesperson, store, service provider, or an attribute or any of these.
Customer satisfaction is a highly personal assessment that is greatly influenced by individual
expectations as follows

Quality factors that are important for customers, including:


Timeliness and convenience,
Personal attention,
Reliability and dependability,
Employee competence and professionalism,
Empathy,
Responsiveness,
Assurance,
Availability, and
Tangibles such as physical facilities and equipment and the
appearance of the personnel.

Timely service is an especially strong determinant of quality across different types of public
services.

Over the years, quality of services has assumed far greater importance in health systems of both
developed and developing countries. In WHO’s framework for health system performance
assessment; health, responsiveness and fairness of financing are three major goals of a health
system. With each component having particular importance, the responsiveness element entails
safeguarding the rights of patients to adequate and timely care.

With numerous assessment measures, consumer satisfaction – which overlaps responsiveness in


various dimensions – is one important evaluation measure of quality and performance of any heath
system. Similarly, ‘legitimate’ expectations about service quality also serve as key tool in
11

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

understanding patients’ aspirations and needs for better health care. The evaluation of services
vis-à -vis consumer satisfaction is, therefore, a dynamic rather than a static process. It provides
time continuous information regarding relative improvements (or shortfalls) in health care
standards.
Generally, in the case of developing countries, it has been noted that patient satisfaction is not
given much importance. It is a self explanatory fact that formal evaluation mechanisms including
consumer satisfaction are absent in the health systems of most developing countries. It has been
argued that consumer perceptions on health care are largely ignored by health care providers in low
income countries. Moreover, it is also noted that health being the exclusive industry – unlike others
– which ignores its clients.
The prehistoric mindset of doctors that only they understand what should be done ignore patients’
inputs, which is not living in reality. It is argued that absence of accredited standards, lack of health
care evaluation, and insensitive attitude of management towards patients’ needs are few of the
factors responsible for low quality of health care in both public and private sectors.
In macro context, low public sector spending on health is also cited as a significant factor for
deteriorating quality of health care in India. With critical social and economic issues including
burgeoning population, low nutrition levels, increasing incidence of poverty and disease, widening
of income disparities, inflationary pressures, and increasing health costs; government spending on
health is miniscule. According to the Economic Survey of India, in 2005, the government spent
merely 5 percent of GDP on the health sector or US$36 per capita.
ii
Responsiveness is a relatively newer area in health research. It has often been defined, in the
context of a system, as the outcome that can be achieved when institutions and institutional
relationships are designed in such a manner that these are cognizant and respond appropriately to
universal expectations of individuals
iii
In addition to evaluation of health status through morbidity and mortality estimates, there has
been equal emphasis on quality of care indicators in health systems research . Therefore, patient
satisfaction can be used as an instrument in health management
information system which can improve the quality of services by tracking certain dimensions of
quality.
iv
Legitimate needs are defined as being universal rather than individualistic and confirms to
recognized principals or accepted rules and standards.
v
In developed countries, patient satisfaction surveys are conducted in hospitals on a timely basis as
a measure to monitor the performance of health establishments.
vii
The concepts of patient satisfaction, patient rights, and protection, therefore, carry little
significance in most hospitals and medical establishments of India.

With ineffectuality of public sector in health care provision; over the years, private referral and
medical treatment has become an increasing phenomenon. Based on 2005 figures, private spending
on health (including household expenditures) is estimated at $ 14 per capita – almost four times
more than public health expenditure per capita. Relatively higher income groups in urban centers
despite access to public hospitals and tertiary medical institutions prefer to consult and receive
treatment in private hospitals, which are considered as more quality oriented. Generally, in absence
of accreditation of health establishments in developing countries studies have noted that for-profit
12

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

establishments also compromise on quality standards.


Poor provision of health care services, relevant health indicators unambiguously demonstrate a
trend towards increasing impoverishment and vulnerability of the populace. Tightening of fiscal
space and limited budget allocations, and underutilization of public sector development
expenditures; ‘health for all’ appears a distant reality in India. Therefore, the concept of social
protection of health – through risk pooling – appears to have assumed critical importance. The
mechanism not only can serve as an important policy instrument to prevent vulnerable households
from falling into ‘health poverty’ but it can also provide them access to health services.
However, their efficacy in terms of scope, service delivery, and quality requires comprehensive
evaluation.

Theoretical framework:-

A service satisfaction survey is to be conducted in 2010 amongst patients treated at a Global


Baroda Hospital. The attitudes of the patients were tested regarding pre-identified service quality
aspects related to healthcare. A total of 100 patients (50 in- and 50 outpatients) are to be personally
interviewed during the research. Although an attempt is to be made to select the patients randomly
it is not always possible due to patients that are not able and/or willing to complete the
questionnaires. In such cases substitutes is selected to overcome the problem of no-responses.

The expectations and perceptions of in- and out-patients with regard to the hospital’s
responsiveness services is reported in this paper. The two dimensions represented a mirror-image
of each other.

A five - point Linker type scale is used to measure the levels of perceived performance of the
13

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

hospitals as well as the expectation levels of the patients. Respondents are to be asked to indicate
their evaluation on the scales in which 1 = Very important (Excellent) and 5 = Not important at all
(Not good at all.)

A total of 6 items were used to measure the responsiveness related variables as offered by the
hospital. An item analysis is to be carried out to test the validity and the reliability of the
questionnaire and an overall coefficient Alpha to be measured for expectations and performance
respectively.

Chapter – 2

14

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

www.globalbarodahospital.com

COMPANY PROFILE:-

GLOBAL BARODA HOSPITAL:-

It is a division of Baroda Medicare Pvt. Ltd. which came into existence with effect from November
2009 as Global Baroda Hospital Pvt Ltd, Company registered with the office of the Registrar of
Companies; Gujarat. The philosophy of the company remains to be patient centric, follower of
ethical medical practices, and a provider of world class healthcare to global clientele.

Global Baroda Hospital owned and managed by its four Directors:-

Dr Rajeev Shah, Dr Bhikhu bhai Patel, Dr Meenaxi Patel and Dr Bina Shah, is the new hospital
chain in Gujarat.

It is engaged in providing high quality medical and surgical care in a host of critical specialties
such as Cardiology and Joint Replacement Therapy, Neurology and Laparoscopic- surgeries,
Nephrology and Kidney Transplant, GI Medicine and Surgeries, Hematology, Oncology and Onco-
surgery, Critical and Emergency Care, Trauma and Orthopedic, Neonatology as well as General
Medicine and Surgeries.

GLOBAL BARODA HOSPITAL

15

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

• Is 110 bedded multi-specialty tertiary care hospitals, equipped with state of the art
infrastructure situated at Manjalpur Vadodara .

• It has 110 beds, 5 high tech operation theatres and 20 ICU beds and HDU beds.

• The wide range of state of art OT equipments include latest surgical operating microscopes,
lights and remote controlled multi tasking operation tables, C-arm with DSA Facility,
anesthesia machines, multi-Para monitors, ventilators, video endoscopes, surgical pendants
by ultra modern sterilization departments.

• The company has a medium sized 110 beds capacity hospital.

WHO’S Who

Executive directors:-

Dr .Rajeev Shah- executive director

Dr .Bhikhu bhai Patel- executive directorss

Dr .Meenaxi Patel- executive director

Dr. Bina Shah-executive director

16

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Executive:-

Dr. Sushma Patel-CE0

Dr. Nirav Shah-Medical Administrator

Mr. Mitesh Shah-Sr, Executive

Mr. Vaibhav Joshi-manager accounts

Miss.Hinal Parik-Manager Accounts

Mr. Praveen kumar-manager marketing

Miss Nirali Parik-manager OPD

Miss Bhoumika Soni- floor manager

Mr. Navueet Trivedi-Store manager

Medical Infracture And Set up

The hospital consists of four floors and this architecture plant is a combination of the classic
natural building and modern natural building.

Ground floor :-

17

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

T he first floor consists of

• Patient waiting hall

• Reception

• 7 OPD,s(1-,general ,2-surgery,3-gyenecology,4-ophthalmic,,5knee joint replacement,6-


orthopaedic,7-physiotheraphy)

• Emergency Room/Minor OT

• Pharmacy

• Preventive Health Check up

• Pathology

• Administration

• Radiology

BASEMENT:-

• Cafeteria

• Store/Purchase dept

Frist floor :-

• Rooms for inpatient(general/AC/NON AC Room/Day Care/General AC)

• Child care NICU

Second floor :-

• Waiting room

• Operation theater(4 Ranging from joint replacement,Ortho, IrI&L )

18

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

• ICU

• HDU(high dependency unit)

• Dialysis

Third floor :-

• Inpatient rooms( suit/deluxe/Air-condition)

Health care Facilities and Services(growth and development)

Specialties and Super Specialties:-

• Core specialties include: Cardiology, cardiothoracic Surgery, Ophthalmology, Neurology,


Neurosurgery, Orthopedics, Critical Care,Urosurgery, Nephrology & Oncology

• Other specialties include Anesthesiology, Dermatology, General Medicine, ENT, General


Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, & Vascular Surgery,
Rheumatology,Pulmology,Pediatrics,Physiotherapy, Neonatology,Onco- Hematology,
Onco-gynecology Onco Surgery, Ophthalmology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry.

19

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Prestigious Services The Hospital Offer:-

• Computer assisted surgery centre

• Laser surgery centre for spine, ophthalmic, vascular and ENT Problems

• Minimally invasive spine surgery centre

• Bariatric surgery centre

• Back and Neck schools

Services:-

• 24 x 7 Emergency services ,ICU on wheels & Ambulance,Pharmacy,Pathology,Radiology


• Specialized services like Pain clinic, Spine clinic, Obesity clinic, Hip and Knee clinic,
• Well Women Clinic, Foot & Ankle Clinic etc.
• Basic services like Health Check up & its packages that suit your requirements
• Third Party Administrator,(TPA)

CORPORATE TIE UP’S

Special services also provided for Corporate patients like medical holidays, health checks and
Corporate health talks.

20

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Followings are the company who have ties with GLOBAL BARODA HOSPITAL,

• Panasonic energy India ltd

• GIPCL

• Alstom

• Suzlon

• Haldyn glass gujrat

• ONGC

• Piramal Glass ltd

• JCT Electronics ltd

MISSION AND VISION:-

21

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

GLOBAL BARODA HOSPITAL aims to redefine the dimensions of health services by providing
comprehensive healthcare solutions with compassionate care, innovative practices and patients
centric services.

Benchmark and Milestone

JOINT REPLACEMENT THEATRE:-

It is the only of its kind in the districts as it has total steel body, modular in design with class 100

Air filtration systems. It is a unique intelligent operation room as it is equipped by classic open
navigation system to drive joint replacement surgeries with tremendous precision. The integrated
operating suite also consists of body exhaust system in a hermetically sealed room lined by PU
flooring and antibacterial, antifungal color coating.

22

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

20 ICU beds with individual and Hi- tech centralized monitoring systems, new generation state

Of art invasive and non –invasive ventilators, special facility for acute and chronic dialysis,

Defibrillators, syringe infusion pumps, centralized medical gas supply systems and centralized
closed systems with round the clock coverage by intensives.

PREVENTIVE AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CHECK UP:-

The GLOBAL BARODA HOSPITAL offers comprehensive preventive health check up plans that
screens each organ closely to detect even the smallest symptoms that could be an indication of a
major disease. It also serves as a personal medical record for further reference.

Occupational , industrial and work related health disorders are specially addressed by hospital’s
preventive medicines departments as we believe that prevention and cure of such health hazard is
our

prime social obligation.

23

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Material Purchase and Storage Department

The Material and Storage Dept. is headed by Mr.Navueet Trivedi(manager stores).The standard
operation procedure is followed as below:-

Receipt STORE PROCEDURE Issue

Items Check by Securities & Inward Department Requisition


Register Entries with Stamping

Items check & verification with P.O. Store Requisition Slip


Delivery challan & Bills. Put up the items in
incoming material

If short quantity recorded inform to Full Description with item codes & prepared by
purchase department & suppliers .If items sign
are recorded in broken condition inform to
purchase department and supplier

Items received & entry in store inward HOD/Authority Sign


register with stamping GRN prepare in
24

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

software. Put the item Code & Prepared


GRN register

Items are storages in location wise & item Send To Store Department
code wise with GRN no.

If P.O. Pending ,inform to purchase Requisition Slip Check, Verification and


dept.pending items received &inform t o counseling
related dept

If items are returned to supplier –Make G.P Item issue and posting in software
Returnable or Non returnable basis

Prepared Store outward Resister with Shortages list prepared


necessary details Security Out ward
Resister .Entry and Check

Send to purchase department

25

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

AN ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF THE FIRM

BOARD= REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORS


26

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

ADMINISTRATION =REPRESNENTATED BY CEO

27

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Global baroda Hospital is not limited to Baroda only , it has also spread it’s a new branch
in Bharuch newly

On 5TH JULY.2010.

28

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

BOARD= REPRESENTED BY DIRECTORS

ADMINISTRATION =REPRESNENTATED BY CEO

29

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

INDUSRTY PROFILE:-

Competitive Scenario:-

Organization has been following either low cost leadership, differentiation strategy or

Focused strategy , it varies directly customers need and profile.

Global Baroda Hospital has been meticulously emphasizing on delivering best quality

Services to customer.

Global Baroda Hospital has been "keeping abreast of the latest developments" keeping

In view of the its counterparts likely Sterlings Hospital, Baroda Heart Hospital,

Metro Hospital, and Bhailal Amin Hospital.

Its major strengths lies on compassionate care, innovative practices and patients centric
services,

Which has delivering Global Baroda Hospital a Competitive Advantage.

Market Share:-

It is known that Global Baroda Hospital is pvt. Ltd. It is anticipating to occupy a firm

Position in Market Share over the period of Time.

Service Life Cycle:- (Stage Characteristics)


30

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

1. Market introduction stage

1. costs are high


2. slow sales volumes to start
3. little or no competition
4. demand has to be created
5. customers have to be prompted to try the product
6. makes no money at this stage

Remarks:-

Global Baroda Hospital has been surpassing the this stage effectively and now ,marching
down to attain its best Growth stage.

2. Growth stage

1. costs reduced due to economies of scale


2. sales volume increases significantly
3. profitability begins to rise
4. public awareness increases
5. competition begins to increase with a few new players in establishing market
6. increased competition leads to price decreases

3. Maturity stage

1. costs are lowered as a result of production volumes increasing and experience curve effects
2. sales volume peaks and market saturation is reached
3. increase in competitors entering the market
4. prices tend to drop due to the proliferation of competing products
5. brand differentiation and feature diversification is emphasized to maintain or increase
market share
6. Industrial profits go down

4. Saturation and decline stage


31

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

1. costs become counter-optimal


2. sales volume decline or stabilize
3. prices, profitability diminish
4. profit becomes more a challenge of production/distribution efficiency than increased sales

According to following stages, Global Baroda Hospital has been achieving its introduction
stage and growth stage in the better direction.

Health Spectrum;-
Spectrum Health is dedicated to finding the most effective ways to electronically connect
our patient health information with physicians and their offices.

Health spectrum has been instrumental to provide this information electronically, which
helps our physician community become more efficient and, more importantly, improves patient
care because the information can be accessed throughout a patient’s life.”

Spectrum Health to improve care collaboration and coordination throughout the entire
continuum of patient treatment.”

Government Rule & Regulation:-


Government has given the direction to follow the following norms in the

Premises of the Hospital.

Following certificate and licenses , Hospital must comply:-

1. Narcotic Certificate

2. PNDT Certificate

3. Spirit Certificate
32

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

4. Lift Certificate

5. Multi Storage Buildings.

ENVIRONMENTAL FRAMEWORK:-
SOCIAL FACTORS:-
Global Baroda Hospital has been doing its best to establish trustworthy doctor-patient

Relationship which has become instrumental to end long awaited quest for the best multispecialty
a Tertiary Care Centre.

Global Baroda Hospital has been servicing with compassionate care, innovative practices and
patient centric services.

Since its inception, Global Baroda Hospital has been providing Free and Concessional Healthcare
to the deserving and needy. The Department of Social Work streamlines the process of granting
such concessional care. The department evaluates patients who require or ask for such free and
concessional care at the hospital, both as outpatients and inpatients.

The vision and mission of the staff is to enrich and preserve-to inspire and be ‘Inspired by Life’. To
that end we have a strong commitment to deliver Quality health services to Patients. The same
resources and medical expertise available to those who can afford the treatment is made available
to the needy and deserving patients who cannot afford the cost of the treatment.

Global Baroda Hospital has been providing the following ;-

1. Free Health Check Up Plan


2. Well Women Camp
3. Bone densitometer Camp
4. Diabetes Camp
5. Preventive Care Seminars
33

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

6. Healthy Student & Healthy Nations Camp

1 HEALTH CHECK UP PROGRAMS

Global Baroda Hospital care for your well being. We all know that a healthy person can live life to
the fullest and excel in every sphere. With today’s sedentary lifestyle, man is getting prone to a
number of ailments and diseases like diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and osteoporosis. All
we need is to develop a consciousness about health and lifestyle. We have launched various health
checks to determine and prevent occurrence of diseases.

Doctor's consultation with complete medical examination.

34

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

Complete hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte


count, platelet count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, peripheral smear)Blood group (ABO, Rh).
Blood sugar (fasting and post prandial).

Blood urea.

Serum creatinine.

Serum uric acid.

Lipid profile.

Urine examination.

X-ray chest PA.

E.C.G.

Eye examination.

Gynecologist consultation and Pap smear test.

Post check-up consultation.

2 Bone Mineral Densitometer Camp

Bone mineral densitometry is an x-ray technique used in the diagnosis and


prevention of osteoporosis. By comparing x-ray images taken at different
intensities, or of different materials, physicians can calculate a patient's bone mass
(or lack thereof). Weak, brittle, osteoporotic bones contain a lower concentration
of minerals like calcium; a quantitative x-ray imaging camera such as those
produced by DALSA Life Sciences can detect these subtle variations in bone
mineral density.

35

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

DIABETES CAMPS:-

Diabetes Camp there provides additional educational component that helps Patients learn how to
manage their disease. For instance, they may learn how to adjust their diet or insulin when planning
exercise, or they may learn how to give themselves their own shots for the first time.

As with “regular” camps, there are all types and arrangements of diabetes camps. There are family
weekend camps, The American Diabetes Association (ADA) has created guidelines for the proper
care of diabetes at camp, and all diabetes camps have access to them.

ECONOMIC FACTORS:-

The economic environment comprises of:

 Income and wealth:-

So far as the Income is concerned , since inception of Global Baroda Hospital

Till now it has certainly achieved its breakeven point of business.

It has Fixes Assets of worth 12 Crores Rupees and its liabilities form Canara Bank

Is also already have paid back.


36

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

As it is the beginning phase of Global Baroda Hospital , it has doing services swiftly

And anticipating to do better over the years.

Employment levels:-

More than one hundred twenty five (125) employees have been serving in the

Global Baroda Hospital, Gujurat.

 Productivity:-

Productivity of the hospital is calculated as ROI , Return of Investment

Which is satisfactory.

The Break Even point in terms of Business is also achieved , since its

Inception.

TECHNOLOGICAL FACTORS:-

• It has 5 high tech operation theatres and 20 ICU beds and HDU beds.

• The wide range of state of art OT equipments include latest surgical operating microscopes,
lights and remote controlled multi tasking operation tables, C-arm with DSA Facility,
anesthesia machines, multi-Para monitors, ventilators, video endoscopes, ssurgical pendants
by ultra modern sterilization departments.

Zero Error OT, with sophiscated high tech computer guided navigation system
37

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

For joint replacement and spine surgery. (1st Guj rat)

Global Baroda Hospital believes to exchange knowledge and education via

INDO-US research study.

Joint replacement theatre has its total steel body modular in design with class 100

Air filtration system.

It is a unique intelligent operation room.

LEGAL ASPECTS OF HEALTHCARE:-


For treatment of the patient there is a Supreme Court ruling that medico-legal aspects are secondary
to life of patient. Treatment should never be withheld due to reason that medico-legal examination
has not been done. Every effort should be made to save the life of patient. To fix the responsibility
Global Baroda Hospital’s duty roster and attendance registers should be maintained.

Prescription should be on proper slip with name, age, sex and address. It should be in legible
handwriting. All the prescribed medicines should have proper doses & instruction. All the
investigations requested should be mentioned on it along with their results so that noncompliance
38

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP VIDYAPEETH:-

by the patient if any comes to the notice immediately. Follow-up date should be clearly mentioned.
It should always bear the signature, name, seal & registration number of the doctor. It will be a
very good practice to have the thumb impression of the patient over it so that if later on there is any
problem of identification of the patient it could be solved satisfactorily.

While issuing the certificates there should be no carelessness. A false certificate should never be
issued. Copy of the certificate must be kept for record so that if doctor is called in the court to
testify the correctness of the certificate, he will not be afraid that what for he is being called in the
court. Identification marks, signatures or thumb impression of the patient must be on it. If called by
court must attend court to certify the issued certificate. Always mention self name and registration
number. It should also bear the seal.

All the records of the patient must be kept for at least 3 years. It is a must to provide copy of the
records within 3 days of asking. All copies should be duly attested before giving it to the patient.
Maintain confidentiality of the records by keeping in safe custody. Professional secrecy must be
maintained while issuing the copies of records

Hospital Staff & Doctors should not be involved in adultery; they should not help or do pre natal
determination of sex and do illegal abortions. They should not consume liquor or drugs and be
intoxicated on duty. Consultations whenever required should never be avoided.

One should never refuse service on religious grounds. A doctor should always be ready to help
during emergence.

Receiving or giving commission (dichotomy) is a bad practice and should not indulge in it. Talking
disparagingly about colleagues is a bad habit and should be avoided. Whenever a doctor agrees to
treat a patient there is a doctor patient contract of care

In poisoning cases inform police; give treatment, record signs/symptoms carefully. If patient is
serious, arrange for recording his dying declaration. Samples of gastric lavage, vomited matter,
urine, blood samples should be preserved, seal & send to police under proper receipt.

One should be aware of the relevant acts while doing general practice so that he does not come in
conflict with the laws. He should e aware of the CPA 1986, Rules 1987, MTP Act 1971, Rules
1975, PNDT Act 1994, Rules 1996, Transplantation of Human Organs Act 1994, Mental Health
Act 1987, Registration of Births & Deaths Act 1969.
39

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OF GBH


-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

40

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

MARKETING DEPARTMENT

The Marketing Department is responsible for implementation of Hospital


marketing programs, including external and internal communication, patient
satisfaction monitoring, and advertising. Graphics, Volunteer Services,
Community Education, and Wellness are all included within the department.

STRUCTURE OF MARKETING
DEPARTMENT

CEO( Dr.Sushma Patel )

MARKETING MANAGER( Mr
Praveen kumar )

EXECUTIVE
P.R.O

floor coordinator
floor coordinator

41

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

PRO---- Administrator(PRO reports to Administrator for any need he want


from ADMIN)

SWOT ANALYSIS:-

STRENGTHS: (Internal)

Knowledgeable staff(GNM & ANM,BSC Nursing)

Excellent Ambience to work

More bang for the information buck

Efficient searching; cost-effective searching

Well organized information


42

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

Quality information

New technologies(Computer assisted surgery centre,Zero bacteria surgery


centre, Minimally invasive spine surgery centre.ss )

Outstanding customer service

Responds to customer (the organization’s staff) needs

Knowledge and understanding of information organization and structure

Service-oriented staff(25 FULL time DRs, More than 75 visiting doctors,


Nursing staff ICU 1;1,

General word 5;1, Special word 3;1)

WEAKNESSES: (Internal)

Perceived gaps in the collection

Library in easily-accessed location to be

Set up.

Blood bank to be set up.

24 hr call center to be developed

Telemedicine center to be developed.

Gym for the patients to be developed

Health care magazines for OPD patients,

To be established.

International Marketing(Medical Tourism Team Development.)

43

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

OPPORTUNITIES: (External)

Magnet status (in nursing) of hospital

Clinical librarianship; rounding; information’s

Electric medical records

Information Technology including internet based technology, Telemedicine,


Education and Training,

Weekend/evening access; after-hours service

Network access; wireless

Newsletter articles; editing

Open access movement

Internet availability

Teaching classes; CME and CNE credits

What do clients want?

Library web site

Self-service

Desktop delivery of articles

Any time, any place library

Table of contents via email

Cooperative purchasing

Market research

Consumer health library access in the community for the organization, Teaching
consumer health information.

44

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

THREATS: (External)

End-user searches

Publication costs and increases

Free-standing surgicenters and specialty clinics

Perception of the library as a “monetary black hole”

The library needs an identity; needs branding

Hot buttons, e.g., current political situation, disaster management

Library staffing levels

low reimbursement; low patient census

Administrations’ lack of understanding of the library

Information access and decision-making

Standardization

Enmeshment

45

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

HUMANRESOURCE DEPARTMENT:-

Function of marketing

1 Analysis and forecasting i.e., marketing research


2. Product development and design
3. Influencing the demand design, advertising etc
4. Service distribution after sales, service etc.

Mr. Mitesh Shah has been serving as HR Manager in the Global baroda
Hospital.

CEO( Dr.Sushma Patel )

HR MANAGER

46

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

HR EXECUTIVE
Medical Administrator(Dr. Nirav Shah)

As a HR Manager he has been taking care of

 Organizational management

 Personnel administration

 Manpower management

 Industrial management

Other activities involving are as follows:-

1. Payroll
2. Work Time
3. Benefits Administration
4. HR management Information system
5. Recruiting
6. Training/Learning Management System
7. Performance Record.

Global Baroda Hospital has been tied up with Canara Bank, which has
been financing its Operation.

47

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

OperationActivity:-

Tertiary Care Multispeciality Hospital

Operation activities involves activities related to activities pertaining to


OPD handing, ICU & HDU Handling

And Customer handling during registration and effective billing.

• Emergency
1 Ambulance Service
2 Health Checkups

Diagnostic Services:

3Lab Services

48

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

4Radio-Diagnosis

5Endoscopy Lab

6 24 Hours Pharmacy

1 Out Patient Consultations


 Main OPD Block
 Registration
 Consultation
 IPD Schedule

» Inpatient Services:

• Admission
• Room Categories
• Intensive Care Units
• Day Care Rooms
• TPA / Insurance
• Inpatient Pharmacy

• Outpatient Pharmacy
The hospital is at the forefront of medical technology and expertise. It provides a
complete range of latest diagnostic, medical and surgical facilities for the care of
its patients.

49

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

Chapter – 4

MODEL APPLICATION:-

Porter's Five Forces

A MODEL FOR INDUSTRY ANALYSIS


The model of pure competition implies that risk-adjusted rates of return should
50

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

be constant across firms and industries. However, numerous economic studies


have affirmed that different industries can sustain different levels of
profitability; part of this difference is explained by industry structure.

Michael Porter provided a framework that models an industry as being


influenced by five forces. The strategic business manager seeking to develop an
edge over rival firms can use this model to better understand the industry
context in which the firm operates.

Let’s apply Michael Porter models on Global Baroda Hospital as Follows,

1. Internal Rivalry –
o about 03 hospitals in Baroda City, likely Metro Hospital, BhailalAmin
o Hospital & Sterling Hospital etc.
o Fierce internal rivalry, because Many competitors
o Operation costs vary
o Substantial excess capacity – occupancy rate < 70% at many hospitals
o Stagnant or declining demand
2. Internal Rivalry – TPA Took Advantage Third Party Administrator,
(TPA)
o (TPA, insurance companies) took advantage:
o Contract with hospitals offering the most favorable rates
o Lower the co-pay to encourage patients to choose those hospitals

Diagram of Porter's 5 Forces

SUPPLIER POWER

51

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

Supplier concentration
BA
RR Importance of volume to supplier
IE
RS Differentiation of inputs

Impact of inputs on cost or


T differentiation
O
E Switching costs of firms in the
N industry
T
R Presence of substitute inputs
Y
Threat of forward integration
Absolute cost
Cost relative to total purchases in
advantages
Proprietary industry
learning curve
Access to
inputs
Government
policy
Economies of T
scale Capital H
requirements R
Brand identity E
Switching A
costs Access
T
to distribution
Expected
O
retaliation
F
Proprietary
products
S
U
B
S
52

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

TITUTES
-Industry growth
-Switching costs -Buyer
Brand to
inclination identity
substitute
-Price-performance trade- -Intermittent
off of substitutes overcapacity
Price sensitivity
-Product differences
Threat of backward integration
-Switching costs

Product differentiation
BUYER POWER
-Brand identity
Buyer concentration vs.
industry
Bargaining leverage
-Diversity of rivals
Substitutes available
Buyer volume
-Corporate stakes
Buyer information
Buyers' incentives

o Due to high price elasticity, demand increase – hospitals are


more homogenous
3. Internal Rivalry – TPA Took Advantage
o Negotiations between TPA and hospitals were secret,
hospitals in disadvantageous position
o Contracts are infrequent – hospitals assumed pressure

The Porter Five Forces Analysis offers a good explanation for the
profitability of an industry, and the firms within it.
53

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

o Established brand identity


o Diversified into related products, e.g., skilled
nursing services
o Differentiated their services, e.g., Joint
Replacement Therapy, etc.
o Patients required hospital in neighborhood –
increase loyalty
2. Entry - Barriers
o Government regulation on new hospital
construction
o Hospitals are capital intensive
o Brand identity not easy for new hospitals
3. Entry – The Other Side
o Manjalpore area grew
o Innovations allowed smaller niche hospitals
4. Substitutes and Complements
o Few inpatient services could be performed outside
the hospitals
o But improvement in surgical techniques made it
possible
o Outpatient diagnostic facilities (ODF) – substitutes
o But ODF can also be complement – hospitals
already had technology

and experience to do it – economies of scope

5. Suppliers
o Demand for nurses high, supply low
o Price rising for drugs and other medical supplies
6. Buyers
o Insurers wield substantial power
o Insurers are large size – high negotiation power,
o Highly skilled physicians became strong buyers
who brought patients

54

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

VALUE CHAIN:-

Value Chain highlights the explorations of internal


analysis of a chain of business activities. It explores the
role and contribution of organization's resources
corresponding to primary and support activities in a cost-
effective way to gain cost advantage. As for the
Balanced Scorecard, it emphasizes the evaluation of
organizational.

All in all, it is important to be aware of their benefits and


weakness as well as the potential problems of three approaches
when applying them real business operations, and it largely relies
on successful implementation by senior managers in
organizations.

Introduction In today's dynamic and competitive business


environment, survival, growth and profitability are the essence
goals of all industries.

The essence of these three frameworks is that they can help senior
managers to make right decision and build and sustain
competitive advantages in the organization level.

55

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

Using the value chain to analyze costs to identify firm's strengths


and weaknesses is much more useful than traditional cost
accounting protocol that most companies are still utilizing.

Applying Value Chain to Global Baroda Hospital, followings are


the analysis:-

SUPPORT ACTIVITY:-

Firm Infrastructure:-Global Baroda Hospital infrastructure is


appealing with its

• Unique seven(7) OPD,s(1-,general ,2-surgery,3-


gyenecology,4-ophthalmic,,5knee joint replacement,6-
orthopaedic,7-physiotheraphy)
56

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

• Emergency Room/Minor OT

• Pharmacy

• Preventive Health Check up

• Pathology

• Administration

• Radiology

Human Resource Management:-


HRM of Global Baroda Hospital has been playing pivotal role in
followings;-

1. Payroll
2. Work Time
3. Benefits Administration
4. HR management Information system
5. Recruiting
6. Training/Learning Management System
7. Performance Record

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT:-GBH
i. It has 5 high tech operation theatres and 20
ICU beds and HDU beds.

ii. The wide range of state of art OT


equipments include latest surgical
operating microscopes, lights and remote
controlled multi tasking operation tables,
C-arm with DSA Facility, anesthesia
57

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

machines, multi-Para monitors, ventilators,


video endoscopes, surgical pendants by
ultra modern sterilization departments.

iii. Zero Error OT, with sophisticated high


tech computer guided navigation system

b. For joint replacement and spine surgery. (1st


Gujarat)

c. Global Baroda Hospital believes to exchange


knowledge and education via

d. INDO-US research study.

e. Joint replacement theatre has its total steel body


modular in design with class 100

f. Air filtration system.

i. It is a unique intelligent operation room

PRIMARY ACTIVITY:-

Healthcare information technology forms a pivotal part of today's


healthcare system. Improved quality of healthcare, patient safety,
drastic reduction in medical errors and enhancement of care
delivery is possible because of the induction of these solutions in
the healthcare delivery environment.

It includes inbound logistics, operation(likely Drs, Nurses


Services), outbound Logistics.

58

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
-: School of Management SUMANDEEP
VIDYAPEETH:-

Here inbound and outbound logistics are taken care by internal


purchase department

And sales & Marketing Department of Global Baroda Hospital


respectively.

59

PROJECT REPORT ON CUSTOMER SATISFACTION


OF GBH
STRATEGIC ADVANTGE PROFILE

Strategic advantage profile is known as SAP. It shows strength and weakness of an


organization. Preparation of SAP is very similar process to the ETOP. There are generally
five functional areas in most of the organizations. These areas are Production or Operation,
Finance or Accounting, Marketing or Distribution, Human Resource & Corporate Planning,
and Research & Development.

Global Baroda Hospital has been using its strength to make the organization to

Have competitive advantage and doing its best to improve its area of Improvement.
(Weakness).

STRENGTHS(Internal)

Knowledgeable staff(GNM & ANM,BSC Nursing)

Excellent Ambience to work

More bang for the information buck

Efficient searching; cost-effective searching

Well organized information

Quality information

New technologies(Computer assisted surgery centre ,Zero bacteria surgery centre,


Minimally invasive spine surgery centre. )

Outstanding customer service

Responds to customer (the organization’s staff) needs

Knowledge and understanding of information organization and structure

Service-oriented staff(25 FULL time DRs, More than 75 visiting doctors, Nursing staff ICU
1;1,

General word 5;1, Special word 3;1)


WEAKNESSES: (Internal)

Perceived gaps in the collection

Library in easily-accessed location to be

Set up.

Blood bank to be set up.

24 hr call center to be developed

Telemedicine center to be developed.

Gym for the patients to be developed

Health care magazines for OPD patients,

To be established.

International Marketing(Medical Tourism Team Development.)

Marketing Fierce competition, company position secure:-

Global Baroda Hospital has been providing the following to strengthen the marketing
activity:-

1. Free Health Check Up Plan


2. Well Women Camp
3. Bone densitometer Camp
4. Diabetes Camp
5. Preventive Care Seminars
6. Healthy Student & Healthy Nations Camp.

Operational Activities -excellent -parts & components available:-


1 It has 5 high tech operation theatres and 20 ICU beds and HDU beds.

The wide range of state of art OT equipments include latest surgical operating
microscopes, lights and remote controlled multi tasking operation tables, C-
arm with DSA Facility, anesthesia machines, multi-Para monitors, ventilators,
video endoscopes, surgical pendants by ultra modern sterilization
departments.
1. Zero Error OT, with sophiscated high tech computer guided navigation
system

2. For joint replacement and spine surgery. (1st Gujarat)

BCG Growth-Share Matrix

The BCG growth-share matrix displays the various business units on a graph of the market
growth rate vs. market share relative to competitors:

Resources are allocated to business units according to where they are situated on the grid as
follows:

• Cash Cow - a business unit that has a large market share in a mature, slow growing
industry. Cash cows require little investment and generate cash that can be used to
invest in other business units.
• Star - a business unit that has a large market share in a fast growing industry. Stars
may generate cash, but because the market is growing rapidly they require
investment to maintain their lead. If successful, a star will become a cash cow when
its industry matures.
• Question Mark (or Problem Child) - a business unit that has a small market share
in a high growth market. These business units require resources to grow market
share, but whether they will succeed and become stars is unknown.
• Dog - a business unit that has a small market share in a mature industry. A dog may
not require substantial cash, but it ties up capital that could better be deployed
elsewhere. Unless a dog has some other strategic purpose, it should be liquidated if
there is little prospect for it to gain market share.

The BCG matrix provides a framework for allocating resources among different business
units and allows one to compare many business units at a glance.
Applying BCG Matrix to Global Baroda Hospital , we can analyse that since

Its inception for the past six months , has acquired very good business in Baroda

City comparison to its competitors likely Metro Hospital, Bhailal Amin Hospital

& Sterling Hospital etc.

It is having better share too, with its minimum investment at initial level , so it is in the
phase of Cash Cow. All the departments of Hospitals are working together to make the best
in Baroda city, I .e they are moving to make the organization Star over the period of time.

ETOP:-
Environmental threat and opportunity profile is referred as ETOP profile. It identifies the
relevant environmental factors. Such factors might be general environmental factors and task
environment factors. Thereafter, it is necessary to identify their nature. Some factors are
positive to the organization whereas others are negative. Therefore, it is necessary to find out
their impact to the organization.

OPPORTUNITIES: (External)

Magnet status (in nursing) of hospital

Clinical librarianship; rounding; information’s

Electric medical records

Information Technology including internet based technology, Telemedicine, Education and


Training,

Weekend/evening access; after-hours service

Network access; wireless

Newsletter articles; editing

Open access movement

Internet availability

Teaching classes; CME and CNE credits

What do clients want?

Library web site

Self-service
Desktop delivery of articles

Any time, any place library

Table of contents via email

Cooperative purchasing

Market research

Consumer health library

Teaching consumer health information access in the community for the organization

THREATS: (External)

End-user searches

Publication costs and increases

Free-standing surgicenters and specialty clinics

Perception of the library as a “monetary black hole”

The library needs an identity; needs branding

Hot buttons, e.g., current political situation, disaster management

Library staffing levels

low reimbursement; low patient census

Administrations’ lack of understanding of the library

Information access and decision-making

Standardization

Enmeshment.

Chapter – 5

Research Methodology

Purpose And Objectives Of The Research:-


The purpose of this paper is to examine responsiveness as determinant of service quality in
Global Baroda Hospital.

The objectives of this study are twofold namely:


• To determine if equality exists between in- patients and out-patients for the service
responsiveness provided to patients in Global Baroda Hospital.
• To determine whether the expectations of in- and out-patients on how hospital staff
responds to their needs in terms of the responsiveness variables, are met (satisfaction).
In- patients refer to patients admitted in the hospital and out-patients refer to patients who
receive medical consultation and/or treatment without being admitted. The service
responsiveness content under investigation includes the constructs: Prompt service during
registration/admission, Reasonable waiting time for treatment, Reasonable waiting time for
receiving medicine, Responsiveness to complaints, Speediness of services by medical staff,
Proper explaining of hospital procedure (what to do and where).

Research Methodology:-
Study Design, Sample Selection and Size, and Data Collection Methodology, Data
Reliability, Ethical Consideration in Data Collection and Limitation of the Study

1. Study Design
This cross-sectional study is designed on the basis of PSQ approach. It represents a
relatively shorter version of the approach comprising 10 questions. These related to different
aspects of health care services provided at the on the basis of these questions (or items);
seven broad scales have been constructed representing key dimensions of services provided
by the hospital. These broad scales are: (I) general satisfaction (ii) technical quality (iii)
interpersonal aspects (IV) communication (v) financial aspects (VI) time spent with the
doctor and (vii) access and availability aspects. In each scale, consumer responses on items
have been captured through five relative scores (Linker scales) which represent consumers’
relative judgments on quality of health care service received at the hospital.

The pre-coded responses were recorded to attain higher item scores for favorably worded
items i.e. indicating greater satisfaction in numeric values. For example, numeric value of
‘Excellent’ in the questionnaire was recorded from 1 to 5. Likewise, similar procedure of
recoding was adopted for the remaining three Linkert scales.
In consumer satisfaction studies, categorization of numeric values of scales measuring
quality has been extensively used in various studies for relative analysis of satisfaction. To
facilitate comparative analysis of consumer perceptions, aggregate scale scores have been
classified into three broad categories which are: (I) High level of satisfaction (ii) Medium
level of satisfaction, and (iii) Low level of satisfaction. Distinction between these categories
(or satisfaction ranges), for instance in low satisfaction, is calculated by taking average point
of minimum cumulated value of dissatisfaction score and minimum cumulated value of
neither agree nor disagree scale.

Sample Selection and Size


At Global Baroda Hospital; around 125 workers are registered under the health protection
scheme. Based on hospital estimates, on average, -30-50customers visit the premises each
day. Broadly, there are two types of patients: (I) OPD patients and (iii) Inpatients. As an
inclusion criterion, the survey exclusively involves interviews with the first type of patients.
Inpatient perceptions of care, therefore, are not under the purview of the study.

In addition, respondents with minimum age of 18 years (i.e. adults) were selected for the
study sample. It is based on the presumption that children possess little comprehension
about complex medical procedures and quality of hospital services.
The purpose of excluding children from the survey, therefore, was to increase the response
rate. The sample, however, makes no distinction on the basis of registration status of
respondents i.e. whether if they are employed workers or dependents of registered workers.
Of total OPD patients who represent the sampling frame, following formula has been used
to select sample size.
Sample size = p (1-p)/e2
Where
p = proportion
e = required size of standard error
It is assumed that p = 0.5 whereas e = 0.05 (at 95 % confidence interval). The total sample
size was estimated to be 100 patients (or respondents). To adjust for non-participation (or
non-responsiveness) factor of consumers, 120 individuals were interviewed in total.

Data Collection Methodology


Data collection was done by a structured questionnaire comprised of ten questions (or items)
related to different aspects of hospital services. As mentioned previously, the questionnaire
was designed using PSQ as a reference point. A pilot survey of ten respondents was
conducted before carrying out the complete hospital survey. To overcome difficulties in
identifying OPD patients from the consumer list, respondents were identified through
‘random selection’ process on days when data was collected. Since consumers were
interviewed in hospital’s premises, the data collection procedure was time-efficient and
convenient while keeping all the survey requirements of the study.

Data Reliability
In psychometric studies, estimation of data reliability is a requisite procedure. In literature
on perception studies (including consumer satisfaction), it is indicated that multi-item
scales
Generally meet the reliability criteria when exceeds the 0.50 value for group comparisons ,
among various techniques.

For levels of consumer satisfaction for remaining scales the response rate of the sample
is estimated to be 97 %
However, some studies have estimated less than 0.40 reliability values which do not infer
insignificance. Such data estimates are reliable but relatively weak at high confidence
intervals.
International studies. Item reliability is estimated at 0.80 whereas scales reliability comes to
0.790.

Limitations of the Study:-


Despite the fact that the present study is a benchmark on estimating patient satisfaction at
the Global Baroda Hospital, it has certain limitations. These are as following:
It exclusively examines the perceptions of patients to evaluate the quality of health
services at the hospital. It has not incorporated the views of the medical staff
It is a particular case study of patient satisfaction at the Global Baroda Hospital.
It exclusively takes into account perceptions provided by OPD patients at the hospital.
The findings do not apply to perceptions of inpatients who are admitted at the hospital.

Chapter – 6

Data Collection & Analysis

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:-
The research methodology that was followed for the investigation is consequently explained.
The data analysis illustrates the levels of importance, perceived performance and
consequently satisfaction of one dimension of service quality dimensions for patients of the
hospital namely, responsiveness.

The sample framework, measuring instrument and data collection and analysis
A service satisfaction survey was conducted in 2010 amongst patients treated at Global
Baroda hospital.The attitudes of the patients were tested regarding patients satisfaction in
healthcare. A total of 100 patients were personally interviewed during the research.
Although an attempt was made to select the patients randomly it was not always possible
due to patients that were not able and/or willing to complete the questionnaires.

The expectations and perceptions of patients with regard to the hospital’s responsiveness
services is reported in this paper. A five - point Likert type scale was used to measure the
levels of perceived performance of the hospitals as well as the expectation levels of the
patients. Respondents were asked to indicate their evaluation on the scales in which 1 =
(Excellent) and 5 = Not important at all (Not good at all.)

A total of 8 items were used to measure the responsiveness related variables as offered by
the hospital. An item analysis was carried out to test the validity and the reliability of the
questionnaire and an overall Cronbach coefficient Alpha of 0.975 were measured for
satisfaction respectively. Data was captured by a trained assistant and analyzed using the
SPSS version 15 statistical.

Case Processing Summary


N %
Cases Valid 100 100.0
Excluded 0 0
Total 100 100.0
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
0.975 16

Overall Satisfaction ( No of Respondents & Percentage%):-


Particulars 1.excellet 2.Very good 3.Good 4.Poor 5.Not good
at all
CzzzzWating Time 12(12.0%) 67(67.0%) 19(19.0.07 2(2.0%) 0
%)

Reception patient co-ordination 17(17.0%) 70(70.0%) 13(13.0%) 0 0

Service of Doctors 15(15.0%) 80(80.0%) 5(5.0%) 0 0

Service of Nursing staff 20(20.0%) 65(65.0%) 13(13.0%) 2(2.0%) 0

Radiological & pathological 20(20.0%) 78(78.0%) 2(2.0%) 0 0


Services

BB Billing and Pharmacy 5(5.0%) 70(70.0%) 20(20.0%) 5 (5%) 0

Administrative Dept 11(11.0%) 65(65.0%) 20(20.0%) 4(4.0%) 0

Quality of Hospital 15(15.0%) 78(78.0%) 7(7.0%) 0 0

Total 115(14.37 573(71.62% 99(12.37% 13(1.62


%) ) ) %)

Chi-Square Test:-

Waiting Time
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 12 25.0 -13.0
2 67 25.0 42.0
3 19 25.0 -6.0
4 2 25.0 -23.0
Total 100

Reception co-ordination
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 17 33.3 -16.3
2 70 33.3 36.7
3 13 33.3 -20.3
Total 100

Service of Doctors
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 15 33.3 -18.3
2 80 33.3 46.7
3 5 33.3 -28.3
Total 100

Service of Nurses
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 20 25.0 -5.0
2 65 25.0 40.0
3 13 25.0 -12.0
4 2 25.0 -23.0
Total 100

Billing & Pharmacy Department


Observed N Expected N Residual
1 5 25.0 -20.0
2 70 25.0 45.0
3 20 25.0 -5.0
4 5 25.0 -20.0
Total 100

Radiological & Pathological Services


Observed N Expected N Residual
1 20 33.3 -13.3
2 78 33.3 44.7
3 2 33.3 -31.3
Total 100

Administration Department
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 11 25.0 -14.0
2 65 25.0 40.0
3 20 25.0 -5.0
4 4 25.0 -21.0
Total 100

Quality of Hospital
Observed N Expected N Residual
1 15 33.3 -18.3
2 78 33.3 44.7
3 7 33.3 -26.3
Total 100

Waitin Receptio Servic Servic Billing & Radiologic Radiologic Quality


g n co- e of e of Pharmacy al & al & of
Time ordinatio Doctor Nurses Departme Pathologic Pathologic Hospita
n s nt al Services al Services l
Chi- 99.920 60.740b 99.500 91.920 114.000a 94.640b 90.480a 90.740b
a b a
Square
Df 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 2
Asym .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000
p. Sig.
Chapter – 7

FINDINGS:-
The patients reported fairly high Satisfaction on all the responsiveness variables (table 1).
This clearly signals that all patients were shown excellent responsive levels. The two most
important issues (in terms of their expectations) for patients in general were: Proper
explaining of hospital procedure (what to do and where to go) and speediness of services by
medical staff. Interesting to note is that the perceived performance of the hospitals services
was in the same sequence, implying that satisfaction was met in terms of the rank. However
if the mean is used as indication, satisfaction was not met as the means of expectations were
lower than the perceived performance.

Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Waiting Time 10 1 4 2.11 .618
0
Reception co-ordination 10 1 3 1.96 .549
0
Service of Doctors 10 1 3 1.90 .438
0
Service of Nurses 10 1 4 1.97 .643
0
Billing & Pharmacy Department 10 1 4 2.25 .626
0
Radiological & Pathological Services 10 1 3 1.82 .435
0
Administration Department 10 1 4 2.17 .667
0
Quality of Hospital 10 1 3 1.92 .464
0
Valid N (listwise) 10
0

*Significant on 0.95 level

Descriptive Statistics of Scale Items :-

Waiting Time for Appointment:-


The GS scale primarily entails Waiting Time for Appointment of the hospital. It includes
items related to consumers’ level of comfort in diverse hospital premises. In terms of
consumer satisfaction, Waiting Time for Appointment was ranked (mean = 2.11). Waiting
Time for Appointment was also found to be skewed towards relatively higher satisfaction
(mean= 2.11.).
Reception co-ordination:-

The GS scale primarily entails Reception co-ordination of the hospital. It includes items
related to consumers’ level of comfort in diverse hospital premises. In terms of consumer
satisfaction, Reception co-ordination was ranked (mean = 1.96). Reception co-ordination
was also found to be skewed towards relatively higher satisfaction (mean= 1.96.).
Service of Doctors:-

Customers s evaluated highest satisfaction with service of Doctors (mean= 1.90). Majority
of patients were satisfied with the doctor prescriptions of drugs at the hospital. Service of
Doctors was also found to be skewed towards relatively higher satisfaction.

Service of Nurses:-
Customers s evaluated highest satisfaction with service of Nurses (mean= 1.97). Majority
of patients were satisfied with the services of nurses at the hospital. Service of Doctors was
also found to be skewed towards relatively higher satisfaction.
Billing & Pharmacy Department:-
Customers was evaluated highest satisfaction with service of Billing & Pharmacy
Department (mean= 2.25). Simply, this suggests that majority of patients were satisfied with
the services of nurses at the hospital. Billing & Pharmacy Department was also found to be
skewed towards relatively higher satisfaction.

Radiological & Pathological Services:-


Customers s evaluated very good satisfaction with (mean= 1.82). Simply, this suggests that
majority of patients were satisfied with the services of radiology & pathology at the hospital.
Radiology & pathology Department was also found to be skewed towards relatively good
satisfaction.

Administration Department:-

Customers s evaluated very good satisfaction with (mean= 2.17), with administrative
services. Majority of patients were satisfied with the administrative services of at the
hospital. administrative Department was also found to be skewed towards relatively good
satisfaction.
Quality of Hospital:-
Customers were evaluated very good satisfaction with (mean= 1.92), with Quality of
hospital.. Majority of patients were satisfied with the quality of at the hospital.
administrative Quality of hospital was also found to be skewed towards relatively good
satisfaction.

A non-parametric test procedure was used to compare the patient’s satisfaction with regard
to the responsiveness variables with their perceived performance of the hospital, as
experienced by the sample as a whole. The test computes the differences between the mean
values of two variables for each case and tests whether the average differs significantly
from 0. This test could be used as the observations for each variable pair was made under
the same conditions. The aim was to determine whether performance on responsiveness
matches the expectations of patients or not.
This variable was rated first in terms of expectations as well as their perceived performance
of the hospitals services. The overall second smallest deviation between expectations and
perceived performance is the speediness of services provided by medical staff.This variable
was rated relatively important in terms of expectations.

Factor Analysis:-

Communalities
Initial Extraction
Waiting Time 1.000 .852
Reception co-ordination 1.000 .715
Service of Doctors 1.000 .818
Service of Nurses 1.000 .872
Billing & Pharmacy Dept 1.000 .696
Radiological & Pathological 1.000 .683
Services
Quality of Hospital 1.000 .840
Administration Department 1.000 .841
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

According to factor analysis, extraction of Billing & Pharmacy department and


Radiological
Department were found as 0.696 and 0.683 respectively, (Magnitude of difference is .
137)which shows that there is a need For area of improvement for these two department of
Global Baroda Hospital.
if we see factor analysis revealed that waiting time and reception co-ordination were having
0.852 and 0.715 respectively with a Magnitude of difference Of 0.10. This indicates both
the variables are comparatively very good for hospital.
While services of Doctors and nurses as well were having 0.818 and 0.872 respectively
with Magnitude of difference is 0.054 , also good for the hospital.
Our aim is to sort out any two variables out of the total eight (08) , whose area of
improvement is
To done and is imperative for betterment of the hospital.
The factor analysis table also indicated that Quality of hospital (in terms of infrastructure)
And Administration Dept were found to be 0.840 and 0.841 respectively which is quiet
good
For Hospital.

Total Variance Explained


Componen Initial Eigen values Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
t Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 6.318 78.972 78.972 6.318 78.972 78.972
2 .741 9.257 88.229
3 .342 4.279 92.508
4 .316 3.944 96.452
5 .130 1.620 98.072
6 .075 .939 99.012
7 .042 .529 99.541
8 .037 .459 100.000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.

Component Matrix
Component
1
Waiting Time .923
Reception co-ordination .846
Service of Doctors .904
Service of Nurses .934
Billing & Pharmacy Dept .835
Radiological & Pathological .826
Services
Quality of Hospital .917
Administration Department .917

Chapter – 8

Suggestions/Recommendation

CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS:-


The results of the investigation hold important implications for future planning and
development in the Global Baroda Hospital. Service managers should take cognizance of
the most important service quality issues identified in this investigation. In this regard, (in
terms of their expectations) for patients in general were: Proper explaining of hospital
procedure (what to do and where to go) and services by medical staff. Coincidently the
order in which they perceived the performance of the hospitals services was in the same
sequence. Further measurements however confirmed that satisfaction were met.

The importance of these findings lies incontrovertibly therein that they prospectively
contribute towards a constructive paradigm shift that espouses the benefits of an improved
perception of service delivery. Based on the findings of this study it can be recommended in
the public health sector should consist of investment in, firstly, an analysis of patients’
perceptions of the performance of a hospital on ongoing and formalized basis and secondly,
of proper staff and management training sessions.

In conclusion, the findings of this study clearly identifies important positive and negative
perceptions regarding the healthcare services provided by the hospital under examination
and substantiate the conclusion that it is imperative the hospital management take the
necessary measures to improve the perceived performance of the hospital. A different
approach should be considered and implemented to satisfy the needs of patients.
References
1
Murray CJL, Frenk J. A WHO framework for health system performance assessment. GEP
Discussion Paper No. 6: Geneva WHO; 1999.
2
Yildiz Z. Measuring Patient Satisfaction of the Quality of Health Care: A Study of
Hospitals in Turkey Journal of Medical Systems. Volume 28 (6) 2004; 581-589.
3
White, Brandi (1999). Measuring Patient Satisfaction: How to Do It and Why to Bother.
Family Practice Management, American Academy of Family Physicians.
4
Government of Pakistan. Economic Survey of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance and
Economic Affairs, Government of Pakistan; 2005.
5
Asian Development Bank. Technical Assistance to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for the
Developing Social Health Insurance Project. Asian Development Bank, Islamabad, Pakistan
(TAR: PAK 37359); 2005.
6
Akram M, Khan FJ. Health Care Services and Government Spending in Pakistan. PIDE
Working Papers 32. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad,
Pakistan; 2007

You might also like