775 views

Uploaded by John McDowall

- RFS_Microwave_Antenna_Systems.pdf
- Report
- Physical Experiment Lab
- Exam 2016-2017
- Travelling Fires in Building Structural Design (Madrid 2011)
- Telecommunication Engineering
- Segmented Magnetic Antennas for Near-field UHF RFID
- Lightning Generated
- Energy Harvesting for Wireless Devices
- Ch2 Antenna Basics
- Awp Course Work
- 1989 - Radio Science Laboratories (Microwave Technologies) Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone, Scribd on January 27, 2016
- EH Antenna Test 1
- AntennaBasicsMods1&2
- Near-field
- Prostar Lit
- Ship Radar
- TBXLHA-6565C-VTM
- RFS Wireless Cell Sites Solutions Brochure May 2011 Office Printer
- Antena tipo Lazo

You are on page 1of 5

George Kizer

Alcatel-Lucent (retired)

2308 Chadbourne Drive

Plano, Texas 75023

George.Kizer@Alcatel-Lucent.com

georgekizer@verizon.net

Abstract— The far field power density of fixed point to point 100% illumination efficiency. Their far field power density is

microwave antennas is well known. However, the near field well known [8].

power density has not been extensively studied. With the wide

deployment of small high frequency antennas, interest in this

issue has increased. This paper provides simple but accurate

formulas for calculating near field power density for circular and

square aperture antennas typically used in fixed point to point

microwave systems.

I. INTRODUCTION

Fixed point to point microwave radio networks have been

deployed across the world since the late 1940’s. Most of the

time these networks located their microwave radio antennas

on tall towers in rural areas or on the top of large urban

buildings. In the last few years, with the ubiquitous

deployment of urban high frequency microwave systems to

support cellular and emerging WiMax and LTE networks, Fig. 1 Circular Antenna Far Field Power Density

microwave radio antennas are becoming much more prevalent

in areas where they may be near the general public.

Various government agencies and the IEEE have

established public protection limits [2] [7] [12] for radio wave

power. Unfortunately there are few accurate, simple methods

of determining this power in the near field of a microwave

antenna. This is especially concerning since the greatest

exposure risk is for small circular and square antennas now

being deployed widely in urban and suburban microwave

radio networks.

At microwave frequencies, the antennas with the largest

physical area have the most gain. These antennas are called Fig. 2 Square Antenna Far Field Power Density

aperture antennas because their defining feature is large area

or aperture. For the aperture antennas commonly used at For square antennas, the far field (and as will be shown

microwave frequencies, antenna pattern, beamwidth and below, the near field) power density is a function of antenna

illumination efficiency are primarily functions of the shape of rotation. However, when viewed directly in front of the

the aperture, the radiation pattern of the power distributed antenna (“boresight”), the power density is invariant with

across the antenna aperture (antenna illumination) and the rotation.

operating frequency. If two antennas have the same aperture The characteristics of an antenna are different at different

shape, aperture illumination and the same normalized distances from it. Very near the antenna, the dominant energy

dimension D / λ (or W / λ), they are electrically identical. is non-radiating (due to “reactive” fields). This is called the

Antenna illumination efficiency (η) is a function of antenna Reactive Near Field. Farther away but still near the antenna is

shape and illumination density. It is a critical function in the Radiating Near Field (or Fresnel) region. In this region,

determining far field gain and near field power density. the energy is radiating (It produces the conventional antenna

Most fixed point to point microwave antennas are circular radiation pattern when viewed from the far field.). Most of

(“dish”) feed horn illuminated aperture antennas with the energy is directly in front of the antenna. The energy in

approximately 50% illumination efficiency or square (“panel”) front of the antenna is roughly independent of distance from

strip line illuminated aperture antennas with approximately the antenna. Much farther away the antenna is the Far Field

(or Fraunhofer ) region. In this region energy is distributed in for calculating near field microwave antenna power density.

a pattern that is dependant upon observation angle from Using Hansen’s H illumination function [4], constant unity

boresight. The pattern relative to boresight is independent of phase (iz • s = 1), replacing k with 2π / λ and normalizing the

distance from the antenna. In this region, at a given angle distance from the antenna to the traditional far field crossover

relative to boresignt, energy is a function of distance squared. distance, 2 D2 / λ, Silver’s results become the following:

At distances far from the antenna, antenna gain and side lobe

(pattern) characteristics are of primary interest. At distances

Up = ( π / λ 2 )∫ F(x, y)(1/ δ)[B + jC ] dx dy

A

very near the antenna, the power density is of primary interest where the integral is over the entire aperture (A) of the

since this is related to public safety. antenna.

Illumination efficiency, a critical parameter in antenna

power calculations, is misunderstood by many engineers

(especially when they do near field power density

calculations). Illumination efficiency does not represent a

power loss. It represents a loss of antenna far field boresight

gain relative to an antenna with energy equally distributed

across the aperture of the antenna. As the antenna

illumination efficiency is lowered, more transmit energy is

located near the center of the antenna which increases the near

field boresight power density.

A common system engineering approach [3] for circular Fig. 3 Antenna Power Density Calculation Geometry

and square antennas is to estimate the near field power density

directly in front of the antenna as 4 P /A. This approach F(x, y) = the field (square root of power density)

calculates the correct near field power density for the fully illumination (H) function

illuminated (η = 1) circular antenna but over-estimates the B = (1 + cos φ ) sin δ + ( [ cos φ ] / δ ) cos δ

power density for a fully illuminated square antenna by 3.5 dB. C = (1 + cos φ ) cos δ - ( [ cos φ ] / δ ) sin δ

It gives no guidance for lower efficiency (η < 1) antennas. A δ=(2πr/λ)

variation of the this approach (equation (13) of [2]) attempts r = distance from a point on the antenna to a point in free

to compensate for illumination efficiency by multiplying the 4 space

P /A result by the illumination efficiency factor η. This = sqrt [ (x2 – x1)2 + y12 + z22 ] with sqrt [ ] the square

misinterprets the η factor as a power loss rather than a power root function

density concentration factor. While it gets the same result as φ = angle formed by Z axis and a ray from a point on the

the first approach for uniform illumination, it underestimates antenna to a point in free space

the power density for the η = 0.5 case (typical for commercial cos (φ ) = z2 / r

parabolic antennas) by 6 dB for a circular antenna and 5 dB Up2 = near field power density at free space point (x2,

for a square antenna. 0, z2)

Bickmore and Hansen [1][10] calculated antenna bore- F(x,y) can be taken as simply the illumination function

sight near field power density for a fully illuminated (η = 1) since the results will be normalized to the far field transition

square antenna and for a circular antenna with uniform or point. Hanesn’s H function produces illumination functions

linearly tapered antenna illumination power. The square which accurately reproduce commercial antenna patterns near

antenna result is typical of current panel antennas. The boresite in the far field [8]. To produce the final result, the

circular antenna results are not typical of commercial real and imaginary components are integrated separately and

antennas. The fully illuminated antenna closed form solutions the results power summed (square root of squares) to arrive at

are useful to validate numerical results. composite power.

Currently the most accurate method for circular antennas Silver’s formula calculates the radiating power in the

is Hansen’s work [5][10]. Unfortunately the published Fresnel and Fraunhofer regions. It does not predict the non-

integral formula has typographical errors and the numerical radiating reactive fields very near the antenna. Hansen [6]

results provided are not typical of commercial antennas. noted that this energy is restricted to the area no greater than

When the typographical errors are corrected, Hansen’s one wavelength (λ) from the face of the antenna (where radial

approach is found to be accurate for the limiting case of large distance is measured to the closest part of the aperture). This

circular antennas (D/λ >> 100) [8]. It is difficult to calculate, result was reconfirmed by Laybros and others [9]. Silver’s

only represents the limiting large antenna case and places the formula is also based upon discarding high order 1/δ terms of

peak and null values in the wrong location for small and a series expansion (the Fresnel field approximation).

medium size antennas. Comparing Silver’s formula with Hansen’s results which

include higher order terms [6] shows that Silver’s formula has

III. GENERAL APPROACH negligible error (< 10%) for radial distances as close as the

Using Silver’s classic results ([11], equation (2), page 170) reactive field transition point. The Silver equation should be

for aperture antennas, it is possible to derive a general method quite accurate for all practical distances from the antenna.

Silver’s two dimensional integral was numerically

integrated for circular antennas with various efficiencies.

Fig. 4 Circular Antenna Near Field Power Density (D/λ = 66)

Fig. 8 Square Antenna Near Field Power Density (D/λ = 66)

Renormalizing Hansen’s H illumination function for

square apertures, the calculations were repeated for square

aperture (“panel”) antennas.

antenna center x was normalized to the antenna diameter or

the square antenna width where width is measured along the

Fig. 6 Square Antenna Near Field Power Density (D/λ = 66) side of the square. The distance in front of the antenna z was

normalized to the traditional far field transition point directly relatively conservative, method for estimating boresight near

in front of the antenna. The normalized antenna size D / λ = field power density is needed for safety evaluations. Power

66 was chosen for illustration since it approximates the value nulls are dependant upon illumination but maximum power is

for 10 foot lower 6 GHz and 6 foot 11 GHz antennas, the most not. If we ignore the power nulls, a general worst case result

popular antenna sizes in the United States [8]. is obtained.

Numerical calculations were accomplished for η between

0.1 and 1 and for normalized antenna sizes (D / λ) or (W / λ)

between 1 and 250.

Fig. 12 Circular (left) and Square (right) Antenna Near Field Power Density

Fig. 10 Circular (left) and Square (right) Antenna Near Field Power Density numerical calculations for various efficiency antennas.

For circular aperture (“parabolic dish”) microwave

From these calculations we may compare the historical antennas, the following apply:

far field transition point (2 D2 / λ or 2 W2 / λ) with the point 10 log10 [ S(∆) / S(∆ = 1) ] = -2 ∆ dB or

at which the actual power diverges from the far field value by

10 log10 [ S(∆) / S(∆ = 1) ]

1 dB.

2 2 3

=A+Bη+C/η+Dη +E/η +Fη

Where A = 40.430453, B = -61.480406,

C = -0.46691971 and D = 55.376708,

E = 0.04791274, and F = -19.805638

For square (“panel”) antennas, the following apply:

10 log10 [ S(∆) / S(∆ = 1) ] = -2 ∆ dB or

10 log10 [ S(∆) / S(∆ = 1) ]

2 2 3

=A+Bη+C/η+Dη +E/η +Fη

Where A = 34.223061, B = -58.288613,

C = 0.51017224, D = 64.124471,

Fig. 11 Circular (left) and Square (right) Antenna Near Field Transitions E = -0.013593334, and F = -29.354905

In both of the above cases, use the smaller power of the

The historical transition formulas are of limited value two equations. For the above cases, the reference power is

since they ignore the effect of illumination efficiency η. If the given by the following:

far field transition is defined as the point at which the circular S(∆=1) = ( π η p ) / ( 16 D2 ) for circular antennas

antenna boresight gain is 1 dB less than the far field gain for = (η p ) / ( 4 W2 ) for square antennas

that distance, the following formulas may be used to estimate The reference power density is the value at the far field

that limit: transition distance d = [ 2 D2 / λ ] for circular antennas or d =

[ 2 W2 / λ ] for square antennas.

∆dB (1 dB far field transition distance for circular antenna) (10 log [ S(∆) / S(∆ = 1) ])/10

[S(∆) / S(∆ = 1)] = 10

= -10.46 + 8.730 η - 4.116 η2 -0.4638 / η S(∆) = [S(∆) / S(∆ = 1)] S(∆ = 1)

Near field power is calculated at the worst case location (bore

∆dB (far field transition distance for square antenna) sight at the reactive near field to Fresnel field transition point

= -8.544 + 6.188 η - 1.954 η2 -0.5349 / η of d = λ) which is ∆ = 1 / [ 2 (D / λ)2 ] or ∆ = 1 / [ 2 (W / λ)2 ].

IV. SIMPLIFIED RESULTS V. CONCLUSIONS

For high efficiency antennas (η ≈ 1), the near field power The numerical calculation of the Silver power density

density varies considerably with distance from the antenna. equation provides information not previously reported. High

This variation reduces quickly as the efficiency is reduced. In efficiency antennas have complicated oscillatory near field

all cases, the highest power density is in a line at the center of power density functions. Lower efficiency antennas have

the antenna and orthogonal to the face of the antenna. The more controlled monotonic power density functions.

Hansen limiting case [8] gives a good indication of the Fortunately, in all cases, the (peak) worst case power density

variation as a function of illumination efficiency. A simple, always occurs directly in front of the antenna. This allows the

complicated numerical results to be greatly simplified. The Fresnel field transition point d = λ (∆ = 1 / [ 2 (D / λ)2 ] or ∆ =

calculated results also reveal a direct relationship between 1 / [ 2 (W / λ)2 ]).

antenna efficiency and far field transition point. Lower

efficiency antennas have effectively smaller diameters (or VI. VARIABLE DEFINITIONS

widths) than their physical dimensions predict. D / λ = normalized diameter of circular antenna

Using the previous numerical results, practical worst case = 1.0167 D (ft) f (GHz) = 3.3356 D (m) f (GHz)

(near the antenna) power limits are calculated based upon the W / λ = normalized width of square antenna

assumption that the antennas are large (D / λ >> 1). For this ∆ = d / [ 2 D2 / λ ] = normalized distance parameter for

assumption only the limiting near field case (left side of Fig. circular antenna

12 graphs) is important. This assumption is accurate for = 0.49179 d (ft) / [ D(ft)2 f(GHz) ]

virtually all commercial antennas currently used in microwave = 0.14990 d (m) / [ D(m)2 f(GHz) ]

bands. ∆ = d / [ 2 W2 / λ ] = normalized distance parameter for

TABLE I square antenna

MAXIMUM ANTENNA INPUT POWER NOT EXCEEDING THE FCC ∆dB = 10 log (∆)

POWER DENSITY LIMIT d = distance from the center of the antenna to the point of

interest

Diameter or Parabolic Antenna Square Antenna

Width (55% efficiency) (100% efficiency)

D = diameter of the circular antenna (aperture)

(feet) Max. Power (dBm) Max. Power (dBm) W = width of the side of the square antenna (aperture)

0.25 7.9 12.4 λ = free space wavelength = 0.98357 / f (GHz) [feet]

0.5 13.9 18.5 = 0.29980 / f (GHz) [m]

1 19.9 24.5 f = radio signal frequency

2 26.0 30.5 A = area of the antenna = π D2 / 4 = W2

3 29.5 34.0 η (power ratio)

4 32.0 36.5 = antenna illumination efficiency (between 0 and 1)

6 35.5 40.0 p = transmit power appearing at the antenna input

8 38.0 42.5 S = near field transmit power density ( power / area )

10 39.9 44.5 REFERENCES

12 41.5 46.1 [1] R. W. Bickmore and R. C. Hansen, “Antenna Power Densities in the

15 43.5 48.0 Fresnel Region,” Proceedings of the IRE, vol. 47, pp. 2119-2120,

December 1959.

The table lists the power into the antenna which results in [2] R. F. Cleveland, Jr., D. M. Sylvar, and J. L. Ulcek, Evaluating

2 Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to

the FCC power density limit of 1 mW/cm . It illustrates the Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields, OET Bulletin 65. Washington,

non-intuitive result that the smaller the antenna, the greater the D. C.: Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering

worst case near field power density. Also, the worst case and Technology, pp 26-30, 1997.

[3] Editorial Board, Reference Data for Radio Engineers, Fifth Edition,

power density is not a function of frequency or antenna gain – Indianapolis: H. W. Sams & Co., pp 25-47 – 25-48, 1968.

just size and illumination efficiency (how densely the energy [4] R. C. Hansen, “A One-Parameter Circular Aperture Distribution with

is spread across the aperture of the antenna). Narrow Beam Width and Low Sidelobes,” IEEE Transactions on

The above results assume a near field exists. For very Antennas and Propagation, vol. AP-24, pp. 477-480, July 1976.

[5] R. C. Hansen, “Circular-Aperture Axial Power Density,” Microwave

small antennas, the far field may begin near the transition Journal, vol. 19, pp. 50-52, February 1976.

from the reactive near field (one wavelength from the [6] R. C. Hansen, “Aperture Theory,” Microwave Scanning Antennas,

antenna). This case exists for the smallest antennas currently volume I, Apertures. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25-26 and 32-33,

used in the unlicensed bands in the United States. 1964.

[7] IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 28, IEEE Standard for Safety

Calculations were made for these antennas: Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency

TABLE II Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, IEEE C95.1-1991, New

York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 12 – 20,

MAXIMUM ANTENNA INPUT POWER NOT EXCEEDING THE FCC 71-72, 1991.

POWER DENSITY LIMIT FOR VERY SMALL PANEL ANTENNAS [8] G. M. Kizer, Digital Microwave Communication: Engineering Point-

to-Point Microwave Systems. New York: Wiley Press, in preparation.

Width (feet) 2.4 GHz 5.2 GHz 5.8 GHz [9] S. Laybros, P. F. Combes and H. J. Mametsa, “The “Very-Near-Field”

0.25 26.2 dBm 12.8 dBm 12.4 dBm Region of Equiphase Radiating Apertures,” IEEE Antennas and

0.5 20.2 dBm 18.5 dBm 18.5 dBm Propagation Magazine, pp. 50-66, August 2005.

[10] T. S. Saad, R. C. Hansen and G. J. Wheeler, Microwave Engineers’

1 24.5 dBm 24.5 dBm 24.5 dBm Handbook, Volume 2. Dedham: Artech House, Inc., pg 34, 1971.

[11] S. Silver, Microwave Antenna Theory and Design. New York:

From Fig. 11 we may infer that antennas with (D or W) / McGraw-Hill, pp 169-180, 195 and 587 - 592, 1949.

[12] United States Federal Government, “OSHA Radiation Protection

λ < 2 may not have a radiating near field. This situation will Guide,” Code of Federal Regulations, 29 CFR Part 1910, Subpart G,

be taken into account automatically as long as all near field Standard 1910.97, subparagraph (a) (2) (i), Washington, D. C.:

power density calculation are made at the reactive near field to published yearly.

- RFS_Microwave_Antenna_Systems.pdfUploaded byRaul Infante Galindo
- ReportUploaded byRahul Gupta
- Physical Experiment LabUploaded byJhonel Paul Sobrados Quezada
- Exam 2016-2017Uploaded byVictor Imeh
- Travelling Fires in Building Structural Design (Madrid 2011)Uploaded byGuillermo Rein
- Telecommunication EngineeringUploaded byumerfarooque
- Segmented Magnetic Antennas for Near-field UHF RFIDUploaded byagmnm1962
- Lightning GeneratedUploaded byShafayet Uddin
- Energy Harvesting for Wireless DevicesUploaded bySandhyaLakshmiR
- Ch2 Antenna BasicsUploaded byChihyun Cho
- Awp Course WorkUploaded bychaitanya
- 1989 - Radio Science Laboratories (Microwave Technologies) Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone, Scribd on January 27, 2016Uploaded byStan J. Caterbone
- EH Antenna Test 1Uploaded byTihomir Mitrovic
- AntennaBasicsMods1&2Uploaded bysagacious.ali2219
- Near-fieldUploaded byΑζΙ Διδ
- Prostar LitUploaded bybaruaeee
- Ship RadarUploaded bybryan_bello_14
- TBXLHA-6565C-VTMUploaded byazzhalim
- RFS Wireless Cell Sites Solutions Brochure May 2011 Office PrinterUploaded byzeb066
- Antena tipo LazoUploaded byMarllory Cobos
- AP19DM03-28T0Uploaded byĐỗ Tới
- Algoritham PaperUploaded bykishore vejandla
- A Hybrid Fractal Antenna for Wideband Applications 2017Uploaded byquipu4k
- ARLAB_magazine2Uploaded byIván Romero Minutti
- Selecting a VHF AntennaUploaded byUFUKKK
- Recorded 15-3400 Lambert Appeal EXHIBIT Re Dr. Nick Begich Lecture at the Covert Harassment Conference in Berlin Germany October 1, 2015, Submitted on December 25, 2015Uploaded byStan J. Caterbone
- Apxvbll15ex c i20Uploaded byAdan
- 06524352Uploaded byPrafull Chikkamath
- pxc387434Uploaded byYudi Joshi
- Ant Aqu4518r0Uploaded bydimakok

- Brodie, Graham (U. Melbourne, Australia) 145Uploaded byeflodum
- CX_8M_E_7Uploaded byAsuncion Ramon
- Chapter 32- Electromagnetic WavesUploaded byKarla Perera
- AUploaded byRyan Arguelles
- Microndas LG Modelo MS-1146SQP - MFL36414701Uploaded byNéstor Morales Medina
- EW Radar HandbookUploaded byDewa Sumarta
- Week2 Ece 4338Uploaded byJannah Ibrahim
- T 7.4.3 Microondas en guías de ondaUploaded byMarlon Hans
- devdiUploaded bypt_miss
- Nimbus-E Press KitUploaded byBob Andrepont
- 06197907 (1)Uploaded bySudhakar Vankudoth
- Strahlenfolter - Electronic Harassment - The Matrix DecipheredUploaded byMind-Control-Victim
- 7th_audio_help.pdfUploaded byJimmy Reece
- Strahlenfolter Stalking - TI - Stephen Lendman - Electromagnetic Frequency Mind Control Weapons - Socioecohistory.wordpress.comUploaded byKarl-Hans-Rohn
- Communication and Electronics 1Uploaded byBobeth Tubig
- Article 292Uploaded byJésus Garcia Quang Hải
- Frenzel FullUploaded byMigz Borlongan
- Honeywell SensorsUploaded bylidmiri
- 161895430 Microwave Link Design PptUploaded byHarish Chandra Mohanta
- DGP - Grand SurveyUploaded byEric T Holmes
- Radio Frontend 5GHzUploaded byAjay Manwani
- 21-Microwave Implement Guides v1_2Uploaded byindra_uhuii
- HP Promo 1972Uploaded byinfo
- RADAR Absorbent MaterialUploaded byjitenderkumarsingh
- Telecommunications ProblemUploaded byHenry Micheal
- mwj201107.pdfUploaded bywrite2arshad_m
- iPASO_EX_описание.pdfUploaded byЕвгений Рубанов
- Digital Radio SystemUploaded byJayesh Singhal
- 5G What You Don't Know May Kill YouUploaded byEmf Refugee
- ECE 138 IntroUploaded byDonna Ambalong