Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org
Why is it a problem?
Many people are unhappy with the banks. Some have been likened to ‘vampire squids’ Why is everyone so angry,
and are they right to be?
Nearly £7 billion will be paid out in City bonuses this year.i
The sum of £7 billion is more than the first wave of public spending cuts
Attempts to change bad bonus behaviour with a levy failed according to former Chancellor Alastair
Darling
The banks face a so-called ‘funding cliff’ next year. It means that they need to borrow much more
money to keep operating, around £25 billion a month – more than double recent trends. Lack of other
sources makes it likely the banks will ask for more public support.
£25 billion a month may seem small compared to the total bail-outs of recent years but it amounts to: one-
half of annual current expenditure on education; or one-quarter of annual current expenditure on health;
We’re told that there’s no alternative to huge public spending cuts in the wake of the crisis-driven
recession. Yet, add together all the taxes in the UK that go unpaid, evaded or avoided and you come
to a figure of £120 billion.ii A vigorous effort to collect even a share of that would completely change the
debate. Yet the banks, and the accountants and lawyers that win lucrative business from them, are busy
finding ever more ingenious ways to help their clients pay their fair share of tax.
How can it be that the banks are in this situation again after getting the biggest bail-out in history? The promised,
serious and necessary changes to our banking system simply haven’t happened.
The ‘Vampire Squid’ animation is a rallying call. The good thing is we’re not alone and real, working alternatives to
the current system are available. Did you know that Sweden has a major bank, Svenska Handelsbanken where
they don’t give bonuses at all? It gets by just fine. There are even voices at the heart of the establishment like
Mervyn King, Governor of the Bank of England, and writers like Martin Wolf of The Financial Times starting to talk
about very fundamental reform of the banking system. King is emphatic that some of the much lauded attempts to
reform banks are thoroughly inadequate and Wolf questioned why the creation of new money should be left to the
‘foolish lending’ of commercial banks.
What can be done to take back our banks?
At last questions are being asked about how to make the banking system fit for purpose. And, government plans to
measure well-being pose an even deeper and long overdue question about the actual purpose of the economy. It’s
a question nef (the new economics foundation) has long said needs asking. But, even on its own terms the banking
system is broken. To design one that is fit for purpose and able to underpin the imminent great transition to a new,
low-carbon, high wellbeing, and stable economy, we need to revisit the social and economic contract that banks
have with society. Banking should be more like a public service, a utility that helps the productive economy
function. That means a root and branch rethink. But to get us going, here’s a few things that can be done now: