Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper was to exhibit how literature courses effects prospective teachers at English
teaching department. In this study, in order to collect the views of prospective teachers on the literature courses in their
curriculum, many students in English teaching department were interviewed by means of questionnaires.
Keywords: literature, English Language Teaching, prospective teachers’ view, Turkish universities
1. INTRODUCTION
Both spoken and written, language has variety of discourse types. Teachers choose one
or more among them and try to use it effectively to teach students foreign language. When we
consider literature and all types of it, literature plays a significant role in teaching various
aspects of language. Literature is consistent component of second language programs of the
appopriate level (Plastina, 1999). Apart from this, literature is also of importance to us to
learn about human nature, to learn about the human past and our own pasts, and to learn about
other cultures. In other words, it consist of great historical, intellectual and societal
importance.
However, literature doesn’t cover very high situation in education. Along with
technology and entering the new millenium, students tend to study on different subjects such
as; genetic, medical, engineering etc. Literature is getting more and more trivial subject
among students. Educators and specialists also have contribution to this declining. They don’t
give enough importance to literature courses. Eren (2004) suggests that for along time,
literature has not been included in the curriculum of teaching English since teaching a foreign
language has been regarded as a matter of linguistics. Educators also major on whether or not
literature sould be included in language and culture curricula, rather than how it can be
integrated fort he benefit of students (Carrolli, 2002).
The problem must be solved. Arıkan (2005) suggests that the place of literature in
English Language Teaching must be concretized so that classroom applications are projected
in a firm manner. Some research and careful examination are being done about the place of
literature in EFL context.But little is done for the prospective English language teachers’
view, whereas their perception can provide valuable information for the assesment and
redesigning procedures of the curricular development of the programs. (Arıkan, 2005). The
aim of this study, therefore, is to illustrate the necessity and effectiveness of literature courses
for prospective English language teacher and how beneficial the idea of them.
2. METHODS
2.1. Participants
The participants were 33 students who had taken literature courses offered at Hacettepe
University, Faculty of Education, ELT department. The ages of the participants consist of
both female and male students (29 females and 4 males).
2.1. The instrument
The main purpose of this questionnaire is to obtain a special kind of information, one data
collection instrument is used in this research. The data were collected through opinion survey
questionnaires conducted with 33 students, who were not previously interviewed. Questions
were asked to reflect participants’ experiences and ideas on their views of literature. Each
question consist of 5 options which students can answer (strongly agree, agree, not sure,
disagree, strongly disagree).
2.1. Data Analysis
The data obtained from this questionnaire were analyzed separately. This grouping
makes evolution easy. Only percentage was given in results, while findings were being
presented. The options of “strongly agree” and “agree” together with and “strongly disagree”
and “disagree” together with were evaluated. “Not sure” was taken separately.
3.FINDINGS
3.1. What are the necessities of literature courses?
As we see in picture1, most of the students who take part in this research (66%) find that
literature courses in ELT department is necessary and the minority of them (12%) find that it is not
required at all. Those who think that syllabus of literature is not appropriate for us, makes up 45% of
total respondents. Majority of students (78%) don’t like literature so they claim that they take this
course just for passing the class. What is more they don’t think they will use literary works in their
daily lives. On the other side, students (30%) can’t make decision about sufficiency in literature
courses. When we look at the 24th question we find an interesting results which students answer for
each option are equal (33%).
Ad SOYAD / H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), ?? (200?), SS-SS 3
Picture 1
AGREE %
DISAGREE %
NOT SURE &
It is needed to take literature courses in ELT department. 66 12 18
30 24 45
The syllabus of literature is enough for ELT department.
33 33 33
24. To contrast with the other lesson, I study literature more willingly
DISAGREE %
72 18 9
I enjoy while reading the famous authors’ work.
81 9 9
Literary works can improve our cultural knowledge.
42 12 45
DISAGREE %
72 12 15
In literature lessons, I don’t get pleasure from fixed syllabus.
63 15 21
. 21 18 60
I like to participate in literature courses.
Literature courses’ importance can’t be denied. But many students don’t share this idea so
some suggestions must be given. Literature shouldn’t be seen as a monotonous courses. It
should become more attractive. Students must find it very enjoyable, appealing and
interesting while teacher are given this course. Teachers should avoid fixed subjects and
create non-threatening atmosphere in class.
Ad SOYAD / H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), ?? (200?), SS-SS 5
REFERENCES
Arıkan, A. (2005). Students’ evaluation of literature courses in the English language teacher education curriculum in
Turkey, Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, (2005) 77-85.
Arıkan, A. (2008). Using internet groups in the learning of literature, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
(H. U. Journal of Education) 34: 19-26 [2008].
Arıkan, A. (2005). An evaluation of literature component of Hacettepe University English Language Teaching
Department, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 29: 27-33 [2005].
Arıkan, A. (2004). Professional development programs and English language instructors:a critical postmodern study,
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 27 : [2004] 40-49.
Arıkan, A., Ünver, Ş., Süzer, H., S., S. (2007). Students’ views on the importance and content of “Turkish History of
Education” course in German and English Language Teaching curricula, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi
Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education) 33: 24-32 [2007].
Carroli, P. (1998, 1999). Perceptions of literature:a comparison of students’ and educators’
views (pp.113-128).Australia:Australian National University.
Reynolds, H., McDiermid, D., Williamson, G. (1994 August). How do prospective teachers think
about literature and the teaching of literature?. ( Report. No. NCRTL-RR-94-1).Washington,
DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).
McDiarmid, Williamson, G. (1995). Studying prospectiveteachers’ views of literature and
teaching literature. ( Report. No. NCRTL-RR-95-3).Washington, DC: Office of Educational
Research and Improvement (ED).
Tang. R. (1999 August). The place of “culture” in foreign language classroom:a reflection. The
Internet TESL Journal, Vol. V, No. 8
Wu. Y. (2008 May). Teaching young adult literature in advanced ESL classes. The Internet TESL
Journal, Vol. XIV, No. 5.
Shang, H. (2006 November). Content-based instruction in the EFL literature curriculum. The
Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XII, No. 11.
Plastina, A.F. (2000 March). Teaching culture in literature in the ESL/EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal,
Vol. VI, No. 3.
Kasper, L. (1999 August). Teaching the short story, "Flowers for Algernon," to college-level ESL students. The
Internet TESL Journal, Vol. III, No. 8.
Henning, S.D. (1993). The integration of language, literature, and culture: goals and curricular design. ADFL
Bulletin 24, no. 2 (Winter 1993): 51-55.
6 Ad SOYAD / H. Ü. Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), ?? (200?), SS-SS