Professional Documents
Culture Documents
One of the most obvious characteristics of your average person in the modern
knowledge economies is widespread confusion. This confusion stems from three
interrelated problems – complexity, information overload, and meaninglessness. In
today’s blog I am going to talk a little about these problems, and the way that having a
well developed spiritual intuition can help solve it.
We can readily see that in modern knowledge economies, there has been a vast increase
in the volume of information, which increases the complexity of society and degrees of
confusion in individuals. That this data tends to exclude information in meaningful
domains such as the spiritual and inner dimensions of human experience adds to the
sense of confusion.
The rather linear thought processes of the critical/rational mind retard receptivity
(relaxed openness to intuitive and spiritual information in a state of presence). In his
book Distant Mental Influence, parapsychologist William Braud
http://www.amazon.com/Distant-Mental-Influence-Contributions-
Consciousness/dp/1571743545/ref=sr_1_1?
s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1293700045&sr=1-1 , for example, argues that rigid thought
processes retard psychic functioning. Therefore, there is good reason to believe that the
contemporary school-as-factory – which emphasises rigidity and control of both
behaviour and thinking – retards access to the extended mind and Integrated
Intelligence http://22cplus.blogspot.com/2010/05/what-is-integrated-
intelligence_09.html. The modern global citizen may be experiencing an expansion of
linguistic, numerical, and technical literacy, while simultaneously experiencing a
retardation of Integrated Intelligence.
One of the most notable characteristics of mystical experience is its capacity for
transcendent perception of the whole, of interconnectedness. In her book The Quantum
Society, Danah Zohar has argued that the modern bureaucratic state retards a sense of
sacredness and connectedness with the whole. Plurality and eclecticism (part of
postmodernism) allow for little sense of commonness, nor any common set of values.
Bureaucracy inevitably becomes the foundation for such a society.
The absence of a genuine spiritual consciousness in modern public education after the
industrial revolution has possibly reduced the ability to access holistic and Integrated
Intelligence and thus of the capacity to see ‘the big picture’. The observer and
subject/object dichotomy, the transcendence of which is required to access
transpersonal awareness (Reanney 1994 p 86), has thus been reinforced. It may follow
that industrialised and post-industrialised societies produce individuals whose minds
have a reduced capacity for conceiving and accessing spiritual dimensions.
A related problematique is that of the Western world’s focus upon possessive
individualism at the expense of meaning and relationship, including relationship
knowledge (Wildman 1996). Total freedom leads to total alienation, argues Clarke
(1989). Modernity’s insistence on the sacredness of the isolated ego state (and its
fragmented consciousness) leaves little place for the connectedness and deep shared
meanings which might potentially be perceived and experienced via Integrated
Intelligence.
* * *
www.extraordmind.com
Have you ever felt you had a greater calling, but been
unable to put your finger on what it is?
www.sageofsynchronicity.weebly.com .
.
i
LeGault (2006) is heavily critical of such intuitive approaches to decision making (especially that of Malcolm Gladwell (2004). LeGault
finds there has been a general decline of standards and American society and life as a whole, and blames much of this on poor decision making based
on intuitions and emotions, rather than critical thinking. He cites postmodernism, feminism and liberalism as part of this decline. America has inherited
the burden of maintaining the Enlightenment’s critical thinking and empiricism, argues LeGault, and this is now at risk. However LeGault fails to
clearly define intuitive thinking, resorts regularly to hyperbole, and often simply labels faulty or disastrous thinking as “intuitive” or “a hunch” without
substantiation of the cognitive processes which have been used in the thinking process. LeGault’s argument highlights some possible dangers of
recklessly applied thinking which is not clearly thought through. However it is not definitive enough in its analysis of intuitive and emotional cognitive
processes to represent a competent critique of intuition in general.
ii
Buddhist teacher Leonard Jacobson (1997) sees that keeping the mind in the present moment is the key to spiritual development. This is
consistent with the tenets of Buddhism.