Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Advanced
CONCURRENT ENGINEERING
Trimester 2 2009/2010
Page 1
Students Name:
FARID KEYHANI (1091900093)
Table of Contents
Page 2
Chapter 1- introduction
What means QFD?
QFD means Quality function deployment. Quality in English means
Excellent, and in Japanese also has meanings of features or attributes too. Quality is
determined by customer expectations, so we can not have quality service or quality
product with out identifying of our customers and discovering their expectations.
Function means that we will meet the expectations of customers, or how our services
or products will work to meet them. Deployment means that how we will manage the
flow of development efforts to make certain that customer expectations drive the
development of our new products and services.
History of QFD
QFD grew in Japan at 1960s by Professors Yoji Akao and Shigeru Mizuno.
The aim of Professor S. Mizuno and Y. Akao was to develop methods of quality
control, which will develop customer satisfaction in the product before it is
manufactured. The introduction of QFD to the U.S.A and Europe began in 1983 when
the American Society for Quality Control published Akao's work in Quality
Progress and Cambridge Research invited Akao to give a QFD seminar in Chicago.
Page 3
strategic competitiveness of the company. It also determines the priority actions that
businesses should take to meet the spoken and unspoken customer requirements.
What is QFD?
Voice of customers
Actually VOC means Customer needs or what customers want. QFD begins with
gathering the Voices of Customers (VOC), and ends with validating their needs. Figure 1.1
show that how QFD starting with voice of customers.
Page 4
House of Quality (HOQ)
House of quality chart used in the collection, compilation and display of
information that has been in the voice of customers.
Quality Function
Deployment’s Correlation 7
House of Quality Matrix
4
Design
Attribute
R s
2 3
1 tt
Customer R Relationships Customer
5 between Perceptions
Needs Customer Needs
and
Design Attributes
6
Costs/Feasibilit
y
8
Engineering Measures
Page 5
Step 1: Customer Requirements and Needs
This step completed by the marketing department, because of marketing
department is relationship with customers.
Page 6
Step 4: Transforming Customer Requirements into Design Engineering
Characteristics
This section of the HOQ is typically completed by the product design or
engineering department. This information represents the design elements that
correspond to customer-stated needs. This process transforms customer requirements
into specific characteristics to be designed into the product.
Page 7
Sometimes two product characteristics have a negative influence on each
other. For example, when one is increased the other is decreased.
Page 8
· Prioritize the requirements
Chapter 3 – Example
QFD for an Ice tea maker
I use the QFD for an ice tea maker that study how to improve its design. The
operation is as follows: Add tea leaves to the steeping basket, and cool water to the
tank, and switch on the machine. The water from the tank enters the heating chamber,
where an electrical coil boils it. The steam pushes the how water through a tube to the
steeping basket. The hot water seeps through the tea leaves, and the tea drips down
into the jar. Finally, the ice-tea is prepared by adding sugar, lemon, and ice to the tea
in the jar, and mixing.
Page 9
Based on surveys, the customer requirements are identified; subsequent analysis of
the
surveys yields the relative importance. Based on the engineering analysis of the
design,
the corresponding technical features that must be modified are identified. Usually, for
each customer requirement, there will be one or more technical feature.
Page
10
NOTES:
· The correlation between the CR’s and TP’s is shown as number values:
Number 9 means high correlation
Number 5 means moderate
Number 3 means weak
A blank cell means that the correlation
· The right hand side shows comparison of consumer preferences to design of
competing products. These numbers are relative, and based on statistics from
customer surveys.
· The ‘roof’ of the House is completed by identification of inter-related TP’s –
there are four types of inter-relationships of concern, these are described in the
table below.
+ STRONG POSITIVE increase in one will increase the other by similar amount
+ POSITIVE increase in one will increase the other a little
- NEGATIVE increase in one will decrease the other a little
- NEGATIVE increase in one will decrease the other by similar mount
· When there are negative correlations, the re-design will involve some conflict
resolution. This means that either a compromise solution must be found by
formulation and solving of some optimization problem, or some design
modules may need to be re-designed so as to eliminate the conflict.
· The technical importance is computed as
6 ( relative importance ) x ( correlation rating )
Thus the importance of “Temperature of water in steeping basket’ = 9x9+2x3 =
87.
Page
11
Page
12
Chapter 4 - conclusion
How to use the House of Quality
Once the house is completely constructed, it provides a guideline for decisions on
which
design features should be modified or upgraded first. If there is unlimited time and
money, we would like to upgrade all the features that can be technically improved.
However, this may not be the best strategy:
(a) A competitor may introduce a new product and capture some of the potential
market
while we are trying to improve our product.
(b) It may be better to provide sequential upgrades to tempt earlier users to buy a new
machines once in every few time periods (for example, digital camera companies used
this technique very effectively in the last few years).
Thus, with budget and time constraints, the House of quality provides the design team
with information to prioritize the important (in terms of customer demand) design
changes.
At conclusion
Tools like QFD have such strong roots in manufacturing that many people in
services either think these tools do not apply to their situation or think they are
simply too complicated. Obviously, the kind of detailed analysis possible with
QFD is just as effective in helping companies understand complex service
processes.
References
· Joseph P. Ficalora and Louis Cohen, Quality Function Deployment and Six
Sigma, Second Edition: A QFD Handbook (Jul 17, 2009), by Prentice Hall, pp
480
· Kevin Otto and Kristin Wood, Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New
Product Development, (2000/11/01), pp 530
Page
13
Page
14