Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
a. FII:
India opened its door to foreign institutional investors in September 1992 in order
to liberalize the financial market. Foreign investment refers to investments made by
the residents of a country in the financial assets and the production processes of other
country. FII flows form a part of foreign portfolio investment has a greater
importance in India and this resulted in effective globalisation in financial service
industries.
1
➢ As FII: Overseas pension funds, mutual funds, investment trust, asset
management company, nominee company, bank, institutional portfolio
manager, university funds, endowments, foundations, charitable trusts,
charitable societies, a trustee or power of attorney holder incorporated or
established outside India proposing to make proprietary investments or with
no single investor holding more than 10 per cent of the shares or units of the
fund.
➢ As Sub-accounts: The sub account is generally the underlying fund on
whose behalf the FII invests. The following entities are eligible to be
registered as sub-accounts, viz. partnership firms, private company, public
company, Institution or funds or portfolios established outside India,
whether incorporated or not, Proprietary fund of FII, Foreign Corporates,
Foreign Individuals.
1. FIIs registered with SEBI fall under two categories:
➢ Regular FIIs: those who are required to invest not less than 70 % of their
investment in equity-related instruments and 30 % in non-equity instruments.
➢ 100 % debt-fund FIIs: those who are permitted to invest only in debt
instruments.
1. Prohibitions on Investments:
Foreign Institutional Investors are not permitted to invest in equity issued by an Asset
Reconstruction Company. They are also not allowed to invest in any company which
is engaged or proposes to engage in the following activities:
a. BSE SENSEX:
2
Bombay Stock Exchange- Sensitive Index is a value-weighted stock market
index, which tracks the performance of the 30 largest stocks, whenever the market
has significantly changed enough to warrant the changes. The index typically
comprises about one fifth of the market capitalization of the entire stock exchange,
although the index only tracks a very small percentage of the total stocks traded on
the BSE.
The Bombay Stock Exchange is the oldest exchange in Asia. The BSE became
the first stock exchange to be recognized by the Indian Government under the
Securities Contracts Regulation Act in 1956.
The BSE Sensex was developed by Bombay Stock Exchange in 1986, giving the
BSE a means to measure overall performance of the exchange. Bombay Stock
Exchange switched to an electronic trading system in 1995.
b. NSE NIFTY:
In 1994, the National Stock Exchange was established in India to provide a more
transparent alternative to The Bombay Stock Exchange. The NSE is a national
exchange integrating the country's stock markets through nationwide automated on-
line screen operations and electronic clearing and settlement. The exchange's products
include equities, exchange-traded funds, stock futures, index futures, interest rate,
futures and options. The S&P CNX Nifty, a diversified 50-stock index representing
23 sectors of the Indian economy, is among the exchange's major indices.
In terms of daily trade numbers, the National Stock Exchange of India (NSE)
is India's largest securities exchange. NSE specializes in three market segments:
wholesale debt, capital market (automated screen-based trading system), and futures
and options (derivatives, the largest segment of the exchange).
LITERATURE REVIEW:
3
Kishore C. Samal (1997)1 opined that in recent years, particularly in
developing countries like India, there had been increased liberalisation of domestic
financial and capital markets, and an opening up of the market to foreign institutional
investors. The main emerging feature of India's equity market was its steady
combination with the global market and its subsequent problems due to the hot
money movement by Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs). Therefore, policy
measures to 'develop' equity market should aim to persuade small domestic investors
to participate in it and oppose the tendency of the FIIs to destabilise the promising
equity market.
Paul A. Gompers & Andrew Metrick (2001)3 analyses the demand for stock
characteristics and its implications on price and return by institutional investors. The
shares of the stock market were doubled by large investors in 1996 compared to 1980.
The demand for stock in large companies has increased where as decreased in small
companies due to compositional shift.
4
Batra (2003)6, using both daily and monthly data attempted to understand the
trading behaviour of FIIs and returns in Indian equity market. He found the strong
evidence of FIIs chasing trends and adopting positive feedback and herding trading
strategies. However, Batra did not find FIIs having any destabilizing impact on the
equity market.
Pushpa, Trivedi, and Abhilash nair (2003)8, suggested that the relationship
between the FII and the Indian economy remains debatable. Although FIIs had been
the net investors in the Indian capital market in the years except 1998, they had not
increased the risk- sharing ability of the market.
Kulwant Rai & N. R. Banumurthy (2004)10 marked that FII inflows depends
on stock market returns, inflation rate, and ex- ante risk. In terms of magnitude, the
impact of stock market returns, and ex- ante risk turned out to be the major
determinants of FII inflows. Stabilising the stock market volatility and minimising the
ex- ante risk would help to attract more FII, an inflow of which has positive impact
on the real economy.
5
volatility of an individual FII variable was positively correlated with the stock market
returns and call money rate.
Michael Frenkel & Lukas menkhoff (2004)12, examined that the institutional
investors’ inflows were the most dynamic capital flows in the emerging market. But
the institutional investors do not automatically provide benefits for the emerging
markets.
Sandhya (2004)13, reported that unexpected flow from FIIs had a greater
impact on stock market than expected flow.
Rakshit (2006)15, criticised that, far from being healthy for the economy, FII
inflows had actually imposed certain burdens on the Indian economy. Understanding
the determinants and effects of FII flows and devising appropriate regulation
therefore constitute an important part of economic policy making in India.
Ila Patnaik (2008)16, reviewed that FII investors prefer highly liquefied firm
for investment. The median value of FII ownership in the first two quintiles 1 was
zero. If the liquidity of the firm increases, the FII shares in the firm also increases.
Bansal (2009)18, opined that when there was a decline in return after the entry
of FII in India, the volatility had been reduced. The volatility of Indian stock market
6
was not only because of FII inflow. There were also some other factors which
influence the volatility of Indian stock market.
During the post- crisis period, variance of the Indian markets does not emerge
as a decisive factor in explaining FIIs inflows to the Indian share market. This may be
due to the change in the attitude of FIIs as the result of Asian crisis. They do not seem
to look at Indian markets as an avenue to diversify their portfolio risk. Such
behaviour on the part of FIIs is also suggested by the lack of significance of the beta
of India share markets in driving the FII investment inflows to the Indian mar
II
7
YEAR END OF MARCH END OF
DECEMBER
1992-93 0 -
1993-94 3 -
1994-95 156 -
1995-96 353 -
1996-97 439 -
1997-98 496 -
1998-99 450 -
1999-2000 506 -
2000-2001 527 -
2001-2002 490 -
8
Source- www.sebi.org
The number of foreign institutional investors which was 3 in1993 increased to 1706
in the year 2009.
There may be many other factors on which a stock index may depend i.e.
Government policies, budgets, bullion market, inflation, economic and political
condition of the country, FDI, Re./Dollar exchange rate etc. The following table
revels the pattern of gross sales, gross purchase, and net investment during the
period 1993- 1994 to 2008- 200919.
9
Year Gross purchase Gross sales Net investment
Rs. In crores Rs. In crores Rs. In crores
1993-1994 5593 466 5126
1994-1995 7631 2835 4796
1995-1996 9694 2752 6942
1996-1997 15458 6974 8484
1997-1998 16679 11804 4876
1998-1999 16507.5 17935.9 -1428.5
1999-2000 57430.4 46846.3 10582.5
2000-2001 73269.3 64179.1 9511.5
2001-2002 50184.4 41453.7 8648
2002-2003 46772.1 44186 2822
2003-2004 148514.3 99547.1 48968.3
2004-2005 214524.1 171604.6 42920.3
2005-2006 347850.6 106697.7 41153.3
2006-2007 522417.8 489770.2 32647.8
2007-2008 947770.5 882699 65073.2
2008-2009 612406.5 658791.9 -46385.7
Source- Capital Market, CMIE (October 1998, & May 2009)20
10
The net investment made by FII in Indian market is volatile. Based on the
performance of the Indian market the net investment changes. During the year of
2007- 2008, the net investment was very high which reaches to RS. 65073.2 crores.
But on the consequent year i.e., 2008- 2009, and on 1997- 1998, the net investment
goes to negative (RS. -46385.7 crores). The gross purchase is lower than the gross
sales because of the economic crisis. FII crossed 65 thousand crores in the Indian
history of capital market in 2008 is the highest investment made by FII.
c. Analysis:
1. Regression- Net investment, Number of FII, Exchange Rate, BSE, NSE:
11
Table 4: Regression- Net investment, Number of FII, Exchange Rate, BSE, NSE.
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate Durbin-Watson
1 .883a
.780 .701 14214.39490 1.194
a. Predictors: (Constant), NSE NIFTY, exchange rate, no. of FIIs, BSE
SENSEX
b. Dependent Variable: net investment
From the above table it is found that the r square value is 0.780, which means
the linear regression has 78% variation in the dependant variable. The Durbin Watson
statistical value is 1.194 which is less than du= 1.832 with a sample size taken n= 16,
and no. of predictors k= 4. So there exists positive autocorrelation.
Table 5: Coefficients
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) -67239.751 26430.123 -2.544 .027
no. of FIIs -71.481 15.129 -1.113 -4.725 .001
exchange rate 2155.203 737.093 .520 2.924 .014
BSE SENSEX 2.992 16.510 .556 .181 .860
NSE NIFTY 10.838 55.897 .600 .194 .850
a. Dependent Variable: net investment
Net investment= - 67239.751+ s10.838 X3+ 2.992 X2+ 2155.203 X4- 71.481 X1.
2. Regression- Net investment, Number of FII, Exchange Rate:
12
From the above table it is found that the r square value is 0.260, which means
the linear regression has 26% variance in the data. The Durbin Watson statistical
value is 1.677 which is more than du= 1.54 with a sample size taken n= 16, and no. of
predictors k= 2. So there exists no positive autocorrelation.
Table 7: Coefficients
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) -72721.803 42053.243 -1.729 .107
no. of FIIs -15.561 17.627 -.242 -.883 .393
exchange rate 2417.131 1136.470 .584 2.127 .053
a. Dependent Variable: net investment
Net Investment= 2417.131 X4- 15.561 X1- 72721.803.
13
Table 9: Coefficient- BSE
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
1 (Constant) 2150.072 1506.511 1.427 .177
bse y .717 .195 .715 3.685 .003
a. Dependent Variable: bse xt
From the above table it is found that the b value is 0.717 which is less than 1.
So the BSE SENSEX index value is stable between the years 1993 to 2008.
From the below table it is found that the b value is 0.702 which is less than 1. So the NSE
NIFTY index value is stable between the years 1993 to 2008.
Null Hypothesis, N0: NSE and purchase has no cause over each other.
Alternate Hypothesis, NA: NSE and purchase has cause over each other.
14
Table 12: Causality for NSE and Purchase
Direction of causality F- value Decision
NSE to Purchase 239.112 Reject
Purchase to NSE 239.112 Reject
Null Hypothesis, N0: NSE and purchase has no cause over each other.
Alternate Hypothesis, NA: NSE and purchase has cause over each other.
15
causality between FII purchases to NSE. Thus proving bilateral Causality. Both are
statistically significant different from zero significance. So they are bilateral
causality.
From the above table, in both the case of BSE and NSE indices, B1and B2 is
not equal to zero and B3< 1. There for, both BSE and NSE indices are stationary
around the deterministic trend.
III
The Indian Equity Market is more popularly known as the Indian Stock Market.
The Indian equity market has become the third biggest after China and Hong Kong in
the Asian region. According to the latest report by ADB, it has a market capitalization
of nearly $600 billion. As of March 2008, the market capitalization was around
$598.3 billion (Rs 30,13,000 crore) which is one-tenth of the combined valuation of
the Asia region. The market was slow since early 2007 and continued till the first
quarter of 2008.
1. Correlation for FII investment in equity market, exchange rate, and number
of FII:
16
Null hypothesis, N0: Equity market has no impact on exchange rate, and number of
FIIs.
Hypothesis, N1: Equity market has impact on exchange rate, and number of FIIs.
Table 16: Correlation for FII investment in equity market, exchange rate, and number of
FII.
equity
market no. of FIIs exchange rate
equity market Pearson 1 -.203 .584
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .550 .059
N 11 11 11
no. of FIIs Pearson -.203 1 -.158
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .550 .642
N 11 11 11
exchange rate Pearson .584 -.158 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .059 .642
N 11 11 11
17
1. Correlation for FII investment in equity market, BSE SENSEX, and
NSE NIFTY:
Null hypothesis, N0: Equity market has no impact on BSE SENSEX and NSE
NIFTY.
Hypothesis, N1: Equity market has impact on BSE SENSEX and NSE NIFTY.
Table 17: Correlation for FII investment in equity market, BSE SENSEX,
and NSE NIFTY.
equity market BSE SENSEx NSE
equity market Pearson Correlation 1 .373 .379
Sig. (2-tailed) .258 .250
N 11 11 11
BSE SENSEx Pearson Correlation .373 1 .999**
Sig. (2-tailed) .258 .000
N 11 11 11
NSE Pearson Correlation .379 .999** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .250 .000
N 11 11 11
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
18
1. Regression for FII investment in equity market, BSE SENSEX, and
NSE NIFTY:
Table 18: Durbin- Watson
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Square the Estimate Durbin-Watson
1 .396 a
.157 -.054 30063.30610 1.066
a. Predictors: (Constant), NSE, BSE SENSEx
a. Dependent Variable: equity market
From the above table it is found that the r square value is 0.157, which means
the linear regression has 15.7% variance in the data. The Durbin Watson statistical
value is 1.066 which is less than du= 1.54 with a sample size taken n= 11, and no. of
predictors k= 2. So there exists positive autocorrelation.
Debt market refers to the financial market where investors buy and sell debt
securities, mostly in the form of bonds. Indian debt market is one of the largest in
Asia and is also considered a useful substitute to banking channels for finance.
19
Government Securities Market (G-Sec Market): It consists of central and state
government securities. It means that, loans are being taken by the central and state
government. It is also the most dominant category in the Indian debt market.
Alternate Hypothesis, NA: Debt market has impact on BSE SENSEX and NSE
NIFTY, exchange rate.
20
Table 20: Correlation for FII investment in debt market, exchange rate, BSE SENSEX, and NSE
NIFTY.
Model Summaryb
From the above table it is found that the r square value is 0.05, which means
the linear regression has 5.5% variance in the data. The Durbin Watson statistical
21
value is 1.772 which is more than du= 1.36 with a sample size taken n= 11, and no. of
predictors k= 1. So there exists no positive autocorrelation.
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
IV
Rate at which one currency may be converted into another. The exchange rate
is used when simply converting one currency to another, or for engaging in
speculation or trading in the foreign exchange rate
There are a wide variety of factors which influence the exchange rate, such as
interest rates, inflation, and the state of politics and the economy in each country.
Also called rate of exchange or foreign exchange rate or currency exchange rate.
a. Correlation for exchange rate, FII net investment, and number of FII:
Null hypothesis, N0: Exchange rate has no impact on FII net investment.
22
Alternate Hypothesis, NA: Exchange rate has impact on FII net investment.
Table 23: Correlation for exchange rate, FII net investment, and number of FII.
net investment
exchange rate no. of FIIs in dollars
exchange rate Pearson Correlation 1 -.158 .593
Sig. (2-tailed) .642 .055
N 11 11 11
no. of FIIs Pearson Correlation -.158 1 -.132
Sig. (2-tailed) .642 .699
N 11 11 11
net investment in dollars Pearson Correlation .593 -.132 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .055 .699
N 11 11 11
23
There are certain limitations applied to investments by FIIs into India. FIIs’ and
their sub- accounts’ investment in an Indian company cannot exceed ten percent
(10%) of the total issued share capital of the Indian company (five percent if the sub
account is a foreign corporation or individual). In addition, the aggregate investment
of all FIIs in an Indian company may not exceed twenty four percent (24%) of its
total issued share capital, without the express approval of its board of directors and
shareholders. Even with board of director and shareholder approval, the same sectoral
limits which apply to foreign direct investment would continue to apply. FIIs may
register with SEBI as a debt fund or an equity fund. FIIs which are registered as
equity funds are required to invest at least seventy percent (70%) of their funds in
equity and equity-related securities. A FII registered as a debt fund, on the other hand,
must invest one hundred percent (100%) of its funds in debt instruments. Foreign
corporations and individuals are not eligible sub accounts of a FII that is registered as
a debt fund. FIIs are not permitted to engage in short selling, other than in respect of
derivative securities traded over a recognized exchange, and must effect transactions
through a registered stock broker. Sector investment prohibitions and caps which
apply to foreign direct investment also apply to investments by FIIs, and FII
investments must also meet the terms with the pricing requirements applicable to
foreign direct investment. In addition, FIIs are not permitted to invest in print media.
VI
CONCLUSION
24
Bibliography
25
11.Kulwant Rai & N R Bhanumurthy, (2004), “Determinants of Foreign
Institutional Investment in India: The role of Return, Risk and Inflation”, The
Developing Economies, Vo 42, Issue 4,pp: 479- 493.
12.Michael Frenkel & Lukas menkhoff, (2004), “Are Foreign Institutional
Investors Good for Emerging Markets?”, The World Economy, Vo. 27, issue
8, pg 1275-1293.
13.Sandhya Ananthanarayanan of Nanyang Technological University
(2004): “Foreign Institutional Investors and Security Returns: Evidence from
Indian Stock Exchanges”, Journal: International Journal of foreign money
supplyManagement,Vol:28.Publisher:MCBUPLtd.
14.Douma, S., Rejie, G. & Kabir, R. (2006). ‘Foreign and domestic ownership
business groups and firm performance-Evidence from large emerging
market”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27(7), pp: 637-657.
15.Rakshit, M. (2006), “On Liberalising Foreign Institutional Investments”,
Economic and Political weekly, Vol. XLI # 11, pp: 18-24.
16.Ila Patnaik & Ajay Shah (2008), “Investment choices of foreign and
domestic institutional investors”, Working Paper.
17.Prasanna. P. K. (2008), “Foreign Institutional Investors: Investment
Preferences in India”, JOAAG, Vol. 3. No. 2, PP: 40- 51 .
18.Anand Bansal, (2009), “Foreign Institutional investor’s Impact on Indian
Stock Prices”, Journal of academic research of economics, vol 1(2), PP:181-
189.
19.Arindam Banerjee (2006), Institutional Investors- emerging trends, ICFAI
University Press.
20.Capital Market, CMIE (October 1998, & May 2009).
21.www.bseindia.com
22.www.equitypandit.com
23.www.nseindia.com
24.www.rbi.org.in
25.www.sebi.org
26
27