Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5.1 Introduction
V2
V3
3
V1
2
The continuity equation, which we will not here derive in its most general (partial differential)
form, is simply a mathematical statement expressing the principle of mass conservation. It can
be stated in words by:
Each side of (5.2) is a mass flux. If these fluxes were different, then the flow through the
contraction would be unsteady since the fluid mass within the region would be increasing or
decreasing with time. Note the assumptions here:
(1) Velocity is the same everywhere at the two cross sections – one-dimensional flow;
(2) V1 and V2 are normal to the y-z planes (i.e. A1 and A2).
(3) There are no leaks through the walls!
where U1 is the local velocity for the element dydz within area A1 (and ditto for U2). (5.2) is
correct if the flow is incompressible (so that ρ1=ρ2) and V1 and V2 are viewed as average
velocities over the two areas.!
Example 2 Assumption (2) above is not generally true.
Consider a turbine blade passage, as shown.
Assume inlet and outlet areas are both A and
assume 1D flow. Then the mass flow rate in
is:
A .
A
!1, V1 "1 CV m1 = "1 AV1 cos#1 .
"2
!2, V2 .
Likewise, m2 = "2 AV2 cos#2 . So applying the
!
mass conservation principle for steady flow
(5.1b) we deduce that
Figure 5.4 The dashed line marks boundaries
of the control volume. !
"1 AV1 cos#1 = "2 AV2 cos#2
We can generalise the mathematical relation expressing the mass continuity principle, as
follows.
piece of CS The mass flux across the CS element dA is "U • ndA where n is
! normal to dA, see figure (5.5).
the unit vector
•
Figure 5.5 Writing dn = ndA, this is d m = "U!•dn . So the total flow rate
across the entire control surface CS is given by
•
m=
! # "U •dn
CS
and this is true whether the flow is locally into or out of the control volume. So (5.1a) can be
expressed by
!d
dt
CV
# #
"dV + "U •dn = 0 .
CS
(5.4)
!
5.3 Bernoulli’s equation
In a general flow the velocity will vary with position, even along individual streamlines.
Newton realised that a change of velocity must always be associated with a force so it is no
surprise that if the velocity varies from point to point then so will the pressure, although the
latter may not be the only cause of forces acting on the fluid. Consider an element of a very
small stream-tube, whose length and area normal to the flow are δs and δA, respectively. At the
dp
two ends the pressures are p and p + "s , respectively, leading to forces on each end of the
ds
element, as shown in the figure. By Newton’s 2nd law (Force = Mass x Acceleration) and noting
U2 p
+ +z=H, (5.5b)
2 g "g
which expresses the fact that the Total Head (H) along a streamline is constant and is equal to
2
the sum of the ‘velocity head’ (U!/2g), the ‘static pressure head’ (p/ρg) and the ‘potential head’
(z). Note that we have assumed the flow to be steady. We have also ignored all other forces
which may act on the fluid element (viscous ones in particular), so use of Bernoulli’s equation
(5.5) requires that these are negligible. The constant H in (5.5b) will in general be different for
every streamline. If the flow is not incompressible there is an alternative form of (5.5) but we do
not pursue that here. The term ‘static’ for the pressure p is perhaps used to distinguish it from
the ‘dynamic’ pressure (ρU2/2). The sum of these two pressures is termed the stagnation pressure
(i.e. total pressure).
To summarise: this form of Bernoulli’s equation is only valid for steady, incompressible and
frictionless (inviscid) flow along a streamline.
For liquid flows, especially where a free surface is involved, (5.5b) will often be the most
convenient form. For gases, (5.5a) is often more appropriate for, since the density is relatively
small (compared to that in liquid flows), the ρgz term is usually negligible compared with the
other terms so that the equation becomes
1
"U 2 + p = constant . (5.5c)
2
Note that Bernoulli’s equation can also be viewed as an ‘Energy Balance’ since an integration of
the force along a streamline !
defines mechanical work (i.e. force x distance).
1
"U 2 = "g#h .
2
Commonly, the fluid is a gas (often air) and the corresponding difference in pressures at the
static and Pitot tappings will be measured in mm of some liquid (often water) by a manometer
of some kind. In these circumstances,
! the above equation becomes
1
"gU 2 = "l g#h , (5.7)
2
where ρg and ρl are the gas density and the density of the liquid in the manometer, respectively.
(Note that there may actually be no fluid in the manometer – for example if it is an electronic
!
micro-manometer embodying a capacitance pressure transducer. But the output of such
devices are often calibrated in terms of mm of water.)
For air velocities measured in mm of water head, the velocity given by (5.7) can be written
"l
U= 2 g#h ,
"g
which yields, taking densities appropriate for standard conditions, g=9.8 ms-2 and with U in ms-1
and Δh in mm of water, U " 4 #h . Thus 4 mm water head is equivalent to about 8 ms-1.
!
Example 2. Discharge
! from on orifice in a tank
Consider a streamline between points (1) and (2), where (1) is remote from the orifice and the
tank is large, so that the velocity at (1) is effectively zero. Applying Bernoulli’s equation along
the streamline from point (1) to point (2), with a datum level at the height of station (2), gives
1
p1 + "gz = pa + "U 2
2
where U is the velocity at station (2), the vena contracta. But the static pressure at station (1) is
given by p1 = pa + "g(h # z) so using this and the above relation yields
!
U = 2 gh . (5.8)
!
Notice that this relation does not hold in the plane of the orifice, where neither static pressure
nor velocity will be uniform, but only
! at the vena contracta where the streamlines are parallel so
[1]
the pressure must be the same as atmospheric (for a small enough jet, see above).
Note also that all other forces – arising from viscosity and surface tension, for example – have
been neglected by use of Bernoulli’s equation. In practice, these are not necessarily negligible so
the actual discharge from the orifice will be less than this ideal value. Equation (5.8) gives the
theoretical velocity at the vena contracta but the actual velocity will be slightly less than this. It is
common to define a coefficient of discharge, Cd’, by the ratio of the actual to the theoretically ideal
mass flux from the orifice. i.e.
actual mass flux actual area of vena contracta x actual velocity there
Cd '= = .
ideal mass flux ideal area of vena contracta x ideal velocity there
Neither the ideal nor the actual vena contracta areas are easily determined but they will
!inevitably be a little smaller than the orifice area. We can replace the ideal area (A) by the latter
if we wish, which would yield a still smaller value of Cd’, Cd say, so definition of the latter
becomes
Cd could then be measured for a given orifice diameter, by timing how long it takes for the
! water height in the tank to drop by a measured amount. You may like to develop the necessary
relationship by extension of the arguments above.