Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2004 85,557,449 / 98,952,499 = 86.46%
2003 57,424,113 / 65,167,031 = 88.12%
Earning assets to total ratio tells us about the bank management efficiency to utilize the earning assets to
get return. Earning assets include loans, investment securities and money market assets. The BAL
earning assets to total assets is slightly decline as compare to previous year. But after comparison with
last year we can easily find out that total assets and earning assets are increasing because BAL is going
to expand its network.
2004 2,123,234 / 85,557,449 = 2.48%
2003 445,679 / 57,424,113 = 0.78%
Return on earning assets can help us about the measurement of profitability. Better ratio means good
utilization of earning assets by bank management to earn profit. If we compare this years ratio that is
2.48% as compare to previous year that is 0.78%. The difference shows incredible change in positive
direction. With the help of better utilization of assets and expansion of its network BAL increase its
ratio.
!c"
2004 2,004,803 / 85,557,449 = 2.34%
2003 1,439,016 / 57,424,113 = 2.50%
This is a key determinant of bank profitability, for it provides an indication of management¶s ability to
control the spread between interest income and interest expense. The ratio of 2004 is 2.34% as compare
to 2003 value that is 2.50%. The ratio is decline, may be the reason behind is that continues decline in
rate of interest by SBP. Government gives more relaxation for investors to increase their investment in
different areas like SME sector etc.
#$%
#$
2004 3,253,416 / 98,952,499 = 3.29%
2003 1,615,777 / 65,167,031 = 2.48%
The ratio another name is funds to total assets. This ownership provides the cushion against the risk of
using debt and leverages. The higher the ratio then more cushions is there and lower cushion with lower
ratio. BAL ratio in 2004 is 3.29% as compare to 2.48% in 2003, which show the improvement and recently
more shares are floating in the market that will make this ratio even better than 2003 value.
&%%&%
%
2004 76,698,322 / 3,253,416 = 23.54t
2003 51,684,984 / 1,615,777 = 31.98t
The ratio of deposits time¶s capital concerns both depositors and stockholders. To some extent, it is a
type of debt/equity ratio, indicating a bank¶s debt position. As I define above, more capital implies a
greater margin of safety, while a larger deposit base gives a prospect of higher return to stockholders,
since more money is available for investment purpose. The overall this ratio is very good in last two years.
But this ratio is decrease in 2004 than 2003 from 23.54t to 31.98t respectively. Deposits are increased by
48% so more deposits are available for investments are there and equity is double approximately.
&%
&%
2004 49,216,120 / 76,698,322 = 64.17%
2003 28,319,401 / 51,684,984 = 54.79%
Average total loans to average deposits are a type of asset to liability ratio. As we know, loans make up a
large portion of the bank¶s assets, and its principal obligations are the deposits that can be withdraw on
request. This ratio is increased from 54.79%in 2003 to 64.17% in 2004, but it¶s not a good sign from debt
point of view because it¶s indicating the increase in risk.
This ratio indicates the liquidity of the bank. well this ratio has been decreased during the year to a small
extent due to
ãBank has increased its deposits so liabilities have been increased.
ãBank has increased its assets as well to overcome the liabilities.
So overall we can say bank is the liquid enough to pay its liabilities
Well in the year 2004 bank¶s this ratio has been increased to a great extent due to different reasons
theses are as follows.
Profit before taxation is low for the 2004 due to more expenses because bank is in expanding mode that¶s
why it¶s expenses are increasing day by day.
Provisions and bad debts also increased in the year 2004 because bank also has invested more in this
year and ad more also granted more loans.
So overall impact of these decrease the profit for the bank and also decrease the earning per share of the
bank. that is not in favor of bank because bank can be failed to cover it¶s loss if it follows the same trend.
Formula :
Provision against non-performing loasn and advances / profit (loss) before tax
= 370208 / 1653734
= 0.22
' $c()c
)*++,-*++.
%/+++/ '
Investments
35,427,596 28,861,596
22.75%
Advances
88,838,824 49,216,120
80.51%
Other assets
3,588,083 1,586,890
126.11%
0112+132*33 4524.12,31
56.71%
6
Bills payable
2,233,671 1,208,671
84.80%
Sub-ordinated loans
1,899,480 649,740
0.00%
Other liabilities
2,967,258 2,186,785
35.69%
6
0.42713255, 4.20342007
148+,9
12*442,5, .27732*.5
0+8419
"#$
Share capital
2,500,000 2,000,000
25.00%
Reserves
1,008,772 790,374
27.63%
Unappropriated profit
856,297 963,042
-11.08%
(:-/#$
.2,312+34 ,271,2.03
038,+9
Minority Interest
41,902 18,000
132.79%
#$
12*442,5, .27732*.5
0+8419
#$-6$
0112+132*33 4524.12,31
56.71%
Mark-up/return earned
5,616,984 4,033,380
39.26%
Mark-up/return expensed
2,434,642 2,028,577
20.02%
%
*25+42305 024072*4.
46.54%
< =>
<
Dividend income
52,539 112,017
-53.10%
Other income
574,860 2,773,503
-79.27%
< =>?
Administrative expenses
2,697,707 1,799,490
49.92%
Other provisions
2,000
100.00%
Other charges
1,700 1,875
-9.33%
Total non mark-up expenses
2,699,407 1,803,365
49.69%
%
023.7250* ,21+1235+
=1,8++9
c
023.7250* ,21+1235+
=1,8++9
Taxation - Current
586,917 1,364,723
-56.99%
= Prior years
(30,000) 22,887
-
- Deferred
9,249 8,507
8.72%
Total Taxes
562,323 1,382,446
-59.32%
?
02+512.54 *20*,2*,.
=.58559
6%%%
*2+7.2341 *23,72354
=*08,.9
Transfer to:
statutory reserve
(218,398) (424,647)
-48.57%
Bonus Shares
(500,000) (1,000,000)
0.00%
@02*052,45A @0237.23.7A
=*78*.9
B( $c()c
)*++,-*++.
&
%/+++/ B( $
(
*++. *++, *++. *++,
Investments
6
Bills payable
Other liabilities
0.42713255, 4.20342007
"#$
Share capital
.2,312+34 ,271,2.03
0.000%
Surplus on revaluation of assets
12*442,5, .27732*.5
#$-6$