'Yes' leads to positive gate and 'No' leads to negative gate, is a

conventional conceptual axiom by the rational thought. The

Cosmos is running under the machanism of space-time functional
Mathemaics just the same as the shape of a never returning sand
stand. Even once inverted, it is never the same again. As
Heraclitus had said, it was only once someone's entering the river
but never should there be a seconf time. 'One' is all his Philosophy
similar to Loa Zhi's Tao Philosophy. But the swing process plays
the role of emancipating cosmological patterning that in a staight
line of never return, it is impossibility. There should be a cycling in
the cosmological machanism to make a certain backgrounding
entities to have a functional Mathematical return to make the
Cosmos run under the proper pace and steps.

One should analysis that the gate is positive or negative by

considering whether the topic-- the question is in positivity or
negativity.So the latter answer, thus depending on whether
positive or negative, determines the gate. A negative question
may be backgrounded by one or even higher order of uncertainty
of Negativity, so a negative answer may not lead it to be a
positive gate. In reverse, a positive question may be also
backgrounded by higher order of uncertainty of negativity, so a
single 'yes' leads to negative gate. Two gates are simply of
Mathematical function, telling one about simple function of
Addition and Substraction. But to add one more uncertainty order,
it becomes a dimension the same as in perceptual dimensional
function which considers a more complex string which may be
only simple Mathematical Addition but maybe the string is needed
to take the consideration of Additional Mathematcs to calculate
the outcome the same a strings' emancipating the conformation
of dimensional space.

A string of emancipating a U should have exprienced

trancendental dasein upon primier backgrounding of uncertainty
of different orders. In reverse, it should be said in reverse as a D is
in reverse of a U. It is also the same that a D should have come
through tracendental process to have a dasein of being
emancipating from higher orders of uncertainty to reach it
reversal. Which is the origin, U or D, both are not but the path of
zigzag to hurl and to embark is determinting.

It is not a matter of which is embarked earlier or more vigaorous

to become a U or a D but the possibility tells it is the same. Two
objects of same weight of different weight doesn't matter for the
possibility because 'The Swing' doesn't care whether which is
which. The Possibility is the outcome of 'The Swing' to detemine
fair chance. Two objects, neglecting the weight, reach the ground
at the same time even no matter whether which is thrown first,
they take the same timing. To ignore the rationl convention,
Physics is Physics. The field doesn't care for Humanity but only
Physical entity. So as to ignore the involvement of Humanity,
Physics becomes the science of only Mathematical Entity.
Humanity is another problematic fielding to get imposed. So To
ananlysis whether God is there, the debate ism over centuries
between Christianity and Hinduism. Now Physics against Humanity
is the same in need of 'The Swing' to give answer through gates of
only 'Yes or ' No'.