TM001

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
DRAFT
To: Aladdin Shaikh,, City of Anaheim Date: August 8, 2009

Bill Moorhead, City of Anaheim
From: Michael Moore,, MWH Reference: 1007151
c.c: Team
Subject: Process Design of City of Anaheim Document No: TM-00
001
Recycling Demonstration Project
INTRODUCTION
The City of Anaheim provides potable water to approximately 350,000 people within a 50 square
mile area. This results in a potable water demand of approximately 75,000 acre-feet
acre per year
(AFY) and 64-80%80% of this demand is met from the production wells. In order to augment the
water supply, the City is in process of building a 100,000 gpd tertiary wastewater treatment plant
pla
that will produce water that meets the Title 22 water quality requirements of California
Department of Public Health (CDPH). MWH was selected by the City to design this water
recycling facility (WRF),, which will consist of Membrane Bioreactor (MBR), ozonation
ozo and UV
disinfection. This technical memorandum will describe the preliminary process design of this
demonstration recycling plant.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Currently the City of Anaheim does not have any water recycling facilities and hence the
wastewater generated within the City’s service areas is collected and treated by Orange County
Sanitation District’s (OCSD) Regional Wastewater Treatment Facilities
Facilities. The proposed WRF will
act as a scalping plant by collecting and treating wastewater fro
from
m the Lemon Street Trunk Sewer
near the intersection of Oak Street and Lemon Street, just northwest of the City Hall West
(CHW) parking structure. The effluent wastewater quality produced by the new WRF will
comply with all applicable federal, state and lo local
cal health and water quality requirements. The
treatment process will include an influent diversion pump station, fine screening, nitrification
and denitrification tanks, membrane filtration system, ozonation system, UV disinfection system,
odor control facility
cility and a clearwell.
The water recycling demonstration project will be built in two phases with ultimate treatment
capacity of 130,410 gpd in order to produce 100,000 gpd of reclaimed water.
water Phase 1 of the
project will consist of designing and buildi
building a 70,955 gpd facility and Phase 2 of the project
TM 001_Process_v1
v1 080709.docx 1 of 36
TM-001 Preliminary Process Design August 7, 2009
will increase the treatment capacity to 130,410 gpd. Table 1 shows the details of the flow-rates
during each phase of the design. As shown, a fine screen will require a spray water flow-rate of
10,000 gpd to clean the screen and carry the screenings to the adjacent sewer. Since the treated
water will be used as the spray/conveyance water, the treatment process units will be designed to
treat this additional volume. Since MBR systems use membrane filtered water for backwashing
and chemical cleaning of the membranes, approximately 15% of the treated water will be
consumed for this function. In addition, waste activated sludge (WAS) volumes needs to be
accounted for when calculating the gross production capacity of the process units. The gross
treatment capacity of the treatment train was calculated by taking into account recycled water
end user demand, fine-screen spray/conveyance water, backwash/cleaning water for membranes
and WAS volume.
Table 1 – Estimated Flow-rates for the Water Recycling Plant
Flow-rates, gpd
MBR
Max Screen Supplemental
Design Average Backwash Total Total
Day Spray WAS Potable Water
Flow Demand Water/CIP Average Peak
Demand Water Required
Water
Phase 1 50,000 58,000 110,000 10,000 1,700 9,255 70,955 121,700 50,745
Phase 2 100,000 107,000 193,000 10,000 3,400 17,010 130,410 206,400 75,990
For fine-screen, spray/conveyance water flow-rate needs to be maintained at 10,000

gpd
Backwash/CIP water volume will be about 15% of the total volume produced by membranes
INFLUENT WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION

In order to characterize influent wastewater, several grab and composite samples were collected
over a period of two weeks. Since the MBR system will be designed as a scalping plant, flow-
rate to the plant will generally remain constant throughout the day. The primary purpose of the
sampling was to determine the variations in the contaminant loading rate to the plant. 24-hr time
composite samples were collected to determine average, maximum month, maximum week and
maximum day organic loading rates. Table-2 shows the water quality sampling plan that was
implemented for influent wastewater characterization. The wastewater samples were collected
from trunk sewer near Oak and Lemon Street. The project team awaiting final lab results for the
last few samples.
TM 001_Process_v1.docxocess_V1.docx 2 of 36
Table 2 - Influent Wastewater Characterization Parameters
Grab 24-hr composite Diurnal (2-hr composite)

COD COD COD
TSS TSS TSS
VSS VSS VSS
TKN TKN TKN
TP TP TP
BOD BOD
NH3-N NH3-N
PO4-P PO4-P
Alkalinity Alkalinity
pH pH
ffCOD
sCOD
TDS
Results obtained from sampling and water quality analyses are summarized in Table 3. The
maximum week concentrations for COD, TKN and TP were calculated at 972, 75 and 8.6 mg/L
respectively based on results from 24-hr composite samples. Probability plots were prepared to
determine the maximum week and maximum month concentrations for each contaminant.
Figure-1 shows the probability plots for COD, BOD, TKN and TP concentrations measured in
24-hr composite samples. Once the project team receives additional results from other sampling
events, these tables and plots will be updated accordingly. Influent wastewater quality results
received from the lab are shown in Appendix A.
Table 3 – Influent Wastewater Quality based on 24-hr Composite Samples
Total
Alkalinity
as
BOD COD TKN NH3-N TP PO4-P pH CaCO3 TSS VSS
Max Day 488 996 76 36 9 5 8 524 508 454
Max Week 474 972 75 36 8.6 4.7 7.9 520 499 443
Max Month 428 890 71 35 8.3 4.5 7.5 503 465 405
Minimum 160 390 49 13 6.0 2.6 6.3 310 99 84
Maximum 490 1000 76 36 8.7 4.8 8.0 525 510 456
Median 230 600 62 28 6.7 3.5 7.0 450 284 236
1200
Concentration, mg/L Influent COD Concentration, mg/L
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Probability
600
Influent BOD Concentration, mg/L
Concentration, mg/L
500
400
300
200
100
0
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Probability
80
Influent TKN Concentration, mg/L
Concentration, mg/L
60
40
20
0
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Probability
10
Influent TP Concentration, mg/L
Concentration, mg/L
8
0
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Probability
Figure 1 – Probability Plot for Influent COD, BOD, TKN and TP Concentrations
TARGET EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

The recycled water produced from the WRF will comply with the recycled water quality criteria
specified in Title 22 and the Water Reclamation Requirements and Monitoring and Reporting
Program issued by the Regional Board as part of the City’s Master Reclamation Permit. Table-4
specifies the effluent water quality criteria for the WRF.
Table 4 – Effluent Water Quality Requirements
Parameter Concentration Unit Standard

BOD < 10 mg/L Annual Average
Nitrate-N 5 mg/L Monthly Average
Turbidity < 0.1 NTU Annual Average
Total Coliform 2.2 MPN/100 mL 7-day median
Total Dissolved Solids < 1,000 mg/L Annual Average
Total Suspended Solids < 10 mg/L Annual Average
Effluent from the WRF will be considered as disinfected tertiary recycled water. The later is
defined per CCR Title 22, Section 60301.230 as a filtered and subsequently disinfected
wastewater that meets the following criteria:
a) The filtered wastewater has been disinfected by either:
(1) A chlorine disinfection process following filtration that provides a CT (the product of
total chlorine residual and modal contact time measured at the same point) value of not
less than 450 milligram-minutes per liter at all times with a modal contact time of at least
90 minutes, based on peak dry weather design flow; or
(2) has been demonstrated to inactivate and/or remove 99.999 percent of the plaque
forming units of F-specific bacteriophage MS2, or polio virus in the wastewater. A virus
that is atleast as resistant to disinfection as polio virus may be used for purposes of the
demonstration.
b) The median concentration of total coliform bacteria measured in the disinfected effluent does
not exceed an MPN of 2.2 per 100 milliliters utilizing the bacteriological results of the last seven
days for which analyses have been completed and the number of total coliform bacteria does not
exceed an MPN of 23 per 100 milliliters in more than one sample in any 30 day period. No
sample shall exceed an MPN of 240 total coliform bacteria per 100 milliliters.
Title 22 also specifies sampling procedures. Sampling provisions per CCR, Title 22, Section
60321 include the following:
a) The daily total coliform bacteria samples shall be taken from the disinfected effluent and shall
be analyzed by an approved laboratory.
b) Disinfected tertiary recycled water shall be continuously sampled for turbidity using a
continuous turbidity meter and recorder following filtration. Compliance with the daily average
operating filter effluent turbidity shall be determined by averaging the levels of recorded
turbidity taken at four-hour intervals over a 24-hour period. Compliance with turbidity
requirements pursuant to not exceeding an average of 2 NTU within a 24-hour period, 5 NTU
more than 5 percent of the time within a 24-hour period and 10 NTU at any time; shall be
determined using the levels of recorded turbidity taken at intervals of no more than 1.2-hours
over a 24-hour period.
c) Should the continuous turbidity meter and recorder fail, grab sampling at a minimum
frequency of 1.2-hours may be substituted for a period of up to 24-hours.
d) The results of daily average turbidity determinations shall be reported to the Regional Board.
Reporting provisions per CCR, Title 22, Section 60329 include the following:
a) Operating records maintained should include: at minimum, all analyses specified in the
reclamation criteria, operational problems, plant and equipment breakdowns, any diversions of
disinfected tertiary recycled water from the use site and any diversions of raw or partially treated
wastewater from the plant, and all corrective or preventive action taken.
b) Minimum reporting requirements to the Regional Board: results of daily total coliform
bacteria monitoring, running 7-day median calculation, maximum daily coliform reading for
previous month(s), minimum daily chlorine residual, results of four hour turbidity readings,
average effluent turbidity (24 hour period), 95 percentile effluent turbidity (24 hour period),
daily maximum turbidity reading, and daily CT compliance determinations.
PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The proposed treatment process flow diagram shown in Figure-2 consists of MBR, ozone and
UV treatment processes. The detailed layout of individual unit processes and a full copy of the
process flow diagram, equipment list and preliminary chemical volume calculations are shown in
Appendix B. Wastewater from the trunk sewer will be pumped to the WRF using
chopper/grinder pumps in order to avoid any clogging in the transfer line. Wastewater will be
treated using a fine screen at the WRF and distributed by gravity to the pre-anoxic zone of the
MBR process. The MBR process will be designed as a 4-stage Bardenpho process with pre-
anoxic and post-anoxic zones to achieve low effluent Total Nitrogen (TN) concentration. The
facility will be designed with provisions for carbon addition in the post-anoxic zone in order to
achieve low effluent nitrate concentration. As specified in the draft design report prepared by
PBS&J, an external tubular configuration membrane system (commercial name DynaLift) will
be used for filtration. This configuration offers several benefits specific to this facility. The
DynaLift membrane system is located outside of the biological process tanks, which simplifies
chemical cleaning as the membranes do not have to be removed from the biological process
tanks. In addition, since the membrane modules can be drained and filled with cleaning
chemicals, the chemical cleaning process does not require lifting the membrane modules out of
the tank.
Membrane filtered effluent will be collected in a 500-gallon equalization tank that will serve as a
feed tank to the ozonation system. The purpose of providing the equalization tank is to allow the
use of booster pump to feed the ozonation system and to allow for continuous flow to the
ozonation system while the membranes are being backwashed. Since the membrane effluent will
have a pressure of less than 2 psi, a booster pump will feed the membrane treated water to the
ozonation system, where the water will be treated further to remove residual color, odor and to
provide disinfection. The selected ozonation system is Title 22 approved system. It will be
designed to deliver sufficient dose and contact time to achieve effluent water quality standards
that comply with Title 22 water quality standards for tertiary disinfected water. Ozonated
effluent will then be passed through the UV unit, which will serve as a secondary barrier against
microbial contaminants. Each of the unit treatment processes will be described in detail in the
following sections. Each unit process will be equipped with instrumentation and control devices
(factory supplied panels) provided by the vendors and communication from each unit process
will be set up with the SCADA system.
Figure 2 - Proposed Process Flow Diagram for the Water Recycling Facility
FINE SCREENING
Membrane clogging due to hair and fibrous materials can result in loss of membrane area and
productivity of the membrane filtration system. In order to avoid this problem, raw wastewater is
always filtered by a fine screen before being fed to the bioreactors and the membrane modules.
The project team will use a center feed perforated rotating drum screen with openings of 1 mm.
Design Specifications and Power Requirements

The proposed drum screen is manufactured by Waste Tech, based in Spartanburg, SC and the
specifications of screen are presented in Table 5. The detailed specifications for the fine screen
equipment are shown in Appendix C.
Table 5 – Specifications for Fine Screen
Parameter Value
Manufacturer Waste Tech Inc.
Model RDS-OF-30
Type Rotating Perforated Drum Screen
Perforations (mm) 1 mm
Length x Width x Height (feet) 5.9 x 2.9 x 4.3
Power requirement, HP (kW) 0.5 (0.37)
Design flow-rate (gpd) 150,000
Spray water flow-rate (gpm) 15
Spray water pressure (psi) 60
The Waste Tech rotating drum screen incorporates a feed distribution head box for effective flow
distribution and an internally screw auger with individual dewatering cells which dewaters and
transports the separated solids out of the drum. Depending on the size of the screen the drum is
direct drive, cog fear drive or trunnion driven. The influent to the drum is distributed over a large
area of the drum to ensure efficient use of the drum open area. As the drum rotates, fluid passes
through the perforations and the solids are removed and dewatered from the drum by the fixed
transport screw.
Since the enclosed perforated drum screen has no seals or slots, all flow must pass through the
perforations, which prevents bypass or carryover of solids to the downstream process. An
automatic Integral Overflow System (IOS) within the screen equipment provides an alarm
indication when screen is clogged in order to prevent raw wastewater from contaminating the
filtered effluent. Separate overflow connection allows raw wastewater to be diverted to the sewer
in the event of screen being clogged. Treated water from the clearwell will be used periodically
(usually every 15-20 minutes for 10-15 seconds) as spray water for the spray system to wash
away biological slimes, grease, etc. A mechanical brush continuously cleans the outside of the
screen whereas the spray water is used as a secondary mechanism to clean the drum.
The system shall be equipped with controls to provide both manual and automatic operation.
Controls shall be housed in a NEMA 4X enclosure complete with HOA Switch for screen drive,
ON/OFF Lights, Fail Lights, Overflow Alarm Light, Main Disconnect with panel mounted
disconnect lockable in the off position. All necessary starters, breakers, fuses, timers and relays
for Automatic and Manual Control.
Scope of Supply & Equipment Warranty

The supplier shall furnish one RDS-OF-30 perforated drum screen with NEMA 4X controls,
spares, anchor bolts, site service and provide delivery to site. The supplier shall also furnish,
boxed for storage and clearly marked, the following spare parts: two complete trunnion wheel
assemblies. The screen equipment is warranted for 2 years after installation.
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) process is an advanced wastewater treatment process which uses
membranes for solids separation instead of clarifiers. Use of membrane for solids separation
allows the process to operate at high MLSS concentration (8,000-12,000 mg/L) irrespective of
sludge settling characteristics and provides superior effluent water quality. Operation at high
MLSS also reduces the required bioreactor volume and use of membrane replaces the need for
clarifiers and media filters thereby reducing the overall footprint of the plant. Typically, a well
operated MBR process with intact membranes will produce effluent with BOD and TSS below
detection levels and turbidity of <0.2 NTU. Since MBRs are usually designed to operate at
higher sludge retention times (SRT), effluent is fully nitrified and effluent ammonia
concentrations are maintained at < 0.5 mg/L-N.
MBR process can be categorized as either submerged or external depending on if the vacuum or
pressure is used to produce permeate. Submerged MBR systems are more frequently used in
municipal wastewater application since external MBR systems are perceived to be more energy
intensive. The external MBR process requires a higher recirculation flow-rate for cross-flow
pumping to provide enough hydrodynamic shear for membrane scouring. But high flux operation
and recent advances in external MBR systems such as air-lift assisted cross-flow pumping have
made external MBR systems competitive to submerged MBR systems. External MBR systems
also offer an advantage in ease of cleaning since it is not required to lift the module out of the
membrane tank for chemical cleaning.
BIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONFIGURATION

MBR systems are usually designed using the MLE process with dual recycle configuration.
Since the recycle stream from the membrane tank has high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration
(3-5 mg/L), it is usually diverted to aeration tank instead of to the anoxic tank. Denitrification is
then achieved by having an internal recycle from aeration to anoxic tank. Recycle flow from
aeration to membrane tank is dictated by the desired MLSS concentration in the membrane tank,
which is usually 10,000-12,000 mg/L. Alternatively, when designed with single recycle
configuration, a larger anoxic tank volume is required to quench the DO from the membrane to
anoxic recycle stream.
The project team proposes to install a MBR process with single recycle configuration with
allowance to split the membrane recycle flow to aerobic and pre-anoxic zones. Screened influent
will pass to the pre-anoxic tank to utilize influent BOD for denitrification process. Mixed liquor
will flow by gravity from the pre-anoxic tank to the aeration tank for nitrification. Nitrified
effluent from the aeration tank will then flow by gravity to the post-anoxic tank for additional
denitrification. The process will be designed with provision for addition of MicroCg
(agriculturally derived carbon source) to the post-anoxic zone to achieve low effluent nitrate
concentration (< 5 mg/L NO3-N).
Denitrified wastewater from the post-anoxic tank will be pumped to the membrane tank for
filtration. The recycle flow-rate from the post-anoxic tank to the external membrane system will
vary from 12-15 times the influent flow-rate. Since the recycle stream from the membrane tank
has high DO concentration (3-5 mg/L), provisions will be made to split the membrane recycle
flow such that the recycle flow can be diverted to either pre-anoxic tank or aerobic tank or both.
Such provision will allow maintaining anoxic conditions in the pre-anoxic tank by diverting part
of the membrane recycle flow to aerobic tank if DO concentration in the recycle stream is high.
The biological process is designed with an SRT of 20 days and detailed calculations for pumps,
blowers and mixers sizing are shown in Appendix D. A BioWin model was prepared to predict
effluent water quality and bioreactor conditions at steady state as well as to simulate different
contaminant loading conditions. Results from BioWin modeling are also shown in Appendix D.
The results shown from BioWin modeling are currently based on maximum week concentrations
only determined from the 24-hour composite samples. Designing to the maximum week loading
will ensure meeting the maximum month requirement for effluent nitrate.
The project will further simulate diurnal fluctuations in organic loading rate when the results for
the diurnal sampling are received. Model runs for annual average, maximum month and
maximum day loadings will also be verified at that time. Based on the steady state analysis, the
proposed biological process design will achieve effluent nitrate concentration of < 5 mg/L-N on
a monthly average basis.
Table 6 – Biological Treatment Process Design Parameters

Parameter Value
Design SRT (days) 20
Design Volumes
Pre‐anoxic 26,030
Aerobic 43,926
Post‐anoxic 17,896
Design HRT, Total (hours) 16
Aerobic MLSS (mg/L) 9,000
Process Air (scfm) 400
Membrane Scouring Air (scfm) 130

Design specifications for biological process equipment and membrane filtration equipment are
shown in Table 7 and detailed calculations are shown in Appendix D.
Table 7 – Mixers and Blower Design Specifications
Parameter Value
Pre-Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixer
Wetted Volume (ft3) 1,791
Mixer Design Power Input (HP/1000 ft3) 1
Selected Motor Size (HP) 3.0
Post-Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixer
Wetted Volume (ft3) 1,176
Mixer Design Power Input (HP/1000 ft3) 1
Process Blower
Process Air Flow-rate (scfm) 200
Power, ideal (HP) -5
Membrane Feed Pump
Design Flow-rate (gpm) 1,025
System Head (ft.) 21
Membrane Permeate Pump
Design Flow-rate (gpm) 60
Membrane Backwash Pump
Design Flow-rate (gpm) 616
Membrane Scouring Air Blower
Process Air Flow-rate (scfm) 60
Power, ideal (HP) -2
MEMBRANE FILTRATION
In accordance to the draft engineering report prepared by PBS&J (June 8, 2009), the membrane
system to be specified is the DynaLift membrane system provided by Parkson Corporation (Fort
Lauderdale, FL). As part of the preliminary process design, the project team requested Parkson
Corporation provide the following information associated with the DynaLift system:
• Scope of supply
• equipment specifications,
• membrane design criteria,
• warranty information,
• list of reference plants.
As part of this request, the project team provided Parkson influent water quality and effluent
water goals, along with the preliminary biological process design parameters. During a follow up
conversation with Parkson’s MBR Group Manger, the project team was asked to contact Norit
X-Flow (Enshede, Netherlands) to obtain the requested information regarding the DynaLift
membrane system. Norit X-Flow is the membrane manufacturer and developer of the technology
(commercial name AirLift MBR) used in the DynaLift membrane system. After further
discussions with Norit, it was explained to the project team that Parkson is no longer an
authorized supplier of the DynaLift technology.
Based on further discussions with Norit X-Flow, the project team was informed that Dynatec
Systems, Inc. (Burlington, NJ) was the original and current authorized representative of the
DynaLift technology in the United States. Dynatec has been providing membrane systems for
wastewater treatment applications for 30 years with many small capacity (<200,000 gpd)
industrial and municipal DynaLift MBR systems currently operating in the United States. Based
on discussions with Dynatec, the DynaLift system design they provide is similar to Parkson’s
design with the major difference being the feed and product header configuration. After speaking
with the Dynatec representative and qualifying their experience and knowledge of the municipal
DyanLift MBR technology, the project team has selected this firm to provide the membrane
equipment for the City of Anaheim MBR facility. Table 8 summarizes Norit’s MBR plants
currently operating in the United States and overseas.
Table 8 Municipal MBR Plants Utilizing X-Flow Tubular Membrane Modules

Location System Supplier Plant Name Start Up Capacity
(MGD)
Naples, FL, Parkson Port of the Islands 2007 0.15
United WRF
States
Delaware, Parkson Millsboro WRF 2009 1.0
United
States
North Parkson Stump Point WRF 2009/2010 0.1
Carolina
United
States
Maryland, Dynatec Glen Meadows 2004 0.12
United
States
Michigan, Dynatec Saddle Ridge 2003 0.03
United
States
Michigan, Dynatec Grand Traverse 2005 0.10
United
States
Dubai UAE Veolia Palm Jumeirah 2007/2008 4.5
Vienna, VA Tech NA 1999 0.03
Austria
Ootmarsum, NMT NA 2005/2006 1.0
Netherlands
Tables 9, 10 and 11 provide preliminary information received from Norit and Dynatec related to
the membrane specifications, membrane system configuration, and membrane design parameters,
respectively associated with the DynaLift technology for the given application. Appendix E
provides general drawings and preliminary flow diagrams for the DynaLift membrane system.
Table 9 - Membrane Specifications

Parameter Value
Membrane & Module Manufacturer &
Model Norit ‐ X Flow (38 PRV, F4385)
Configuration Tubular / External
Nominal Pore Size (micrometer) 0.03
Absolute Pore Size (micrometer) 0.05
Inner Tube Diameter (mm) 5.2
Membrane Material Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF)
Active Membrane Area per Module (m2) 29
Maximum Backwash Pressure (bar) 1
Trans‐Membrane Pressure Range (bar) 0.07‐0.34
Maximum Temperature (Deg C) 40
pH Range 2‐10
Table 10 - Membrane System Configuration

Parameter Value
Membrane Skid Configuration (Phase 1)
Number of skids 1
Number of installed UF Modules per skid 10
Max. Spare Modules per skid 2
Gross Product Flow, Train A (gpd) 80000
Skid footprint, ft (LXWXH) 10.2X2.6X14.8
Membrane Skid Configuration (Phase 2)
Number of skids added 1
Number of installed UF Modules per skid 10
Max. Spare Modules per skid 2
Gross Product Flow, Train A/Train B (gpd) 65,000/65,000
Skid footprint, ft (LXWXH) 10.2X2.6X14.8
Table 11 - Membrane Design Parameters

Parameter Value
Max Gross Flux (GFD) 25‐30
Filtration Time (min) 9
Backwash Duration (s) 15
Backwash Flow per module (gpm) 44
Drain Sequence Frequency per skid (hr/DS) 1
Drain Sequence Duration per skid (s) 30
Drain Volume per module (gallons) 42
Chemical Enhanced Backwash Frequency per skid (days/CEB) 7
Chemical Cleaning with Re‐circulation Frequency per skid
(day/CCR) 30
Recovery during max. flux (%) 84.3
Airlift (SCFM) per module 6

An example of a typical pro-rated lifetime membrane warranty provided by Norit is provided in
Appendix E. In general, the terms of the warranty replace a membrane element found to be
defective in the first 12 months at no cost to the owner. However, membranes identified to be
defective after 12 months are replaced at a prorated charge calculated as follows:
Pro-rated membrane replacement =
New Membrane Cost x Months of Beneficial Use

Total Membrane element warranty period (36 months)
The warranty is also subject to a number of conditions related to the operation and performance
documentation.
In addition to membrane warranty, Dynatec will provide manufacturer warranty on all equipment
associated with the membrane system (i.e. blowers, pumps, valves, chemical dosing systems,
gauges, etc.). A complete scope of supply, equipment list, and budgetary cost estimate for the
DynaLift membrane system is currently being prepared by Dynatec and will be incorporated into
the overall engineering estimate of the plant in the final TM.
OZONATION
Ozonation is an alternative disinfection technology for reuse applications. Like chlorine,
ozonation is also considered a chemical disinfection process. However, ozone is a much stronger
disinfectant than chlorine, and does not produce DBPs such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and
haloacetic acids (HAAs). Other DBPs may be formed from ozonation (bromate), but this process
depends on the bromide concentration in the water (expected to be low in this case) may be
successfully controlled by pH adjustment and peroxide addition.
For long time, UV has dominated the disinfection market due to the very short contact times
required to achieve the desired inactivation goals. Ozone, on the other hand, is a gas sparingly
soluble in water, which requires longer contact time to dissolve and become effective for
disinfection. For this reason, the traditional ozonation process requires large contact basins with
multiple contact chambers. Ozone is bubbled in the first 2-3 chambers and additional
contact/reaction time is provided by the subsequent chambers. The contact time (CT)
requirements for disinfection are met when the effluent leaves the last chamber.
However, for applications of the size required at the WRF, alternative ozonation systems are
available. Pressurized plug-flow tubular reactors, where ozone can be added in sequential steps,
allow ozone to dissolve faster in water, and to utilize it more efficiently than using contact basins
(i.e., by increasing dissolution in water, ozone losses to air are reduced). Under these conditions,
ozone can compete effectively with UV to achieve the required disinfection goals for recycled
water. Other advantages of ozonation over the UV process include providing higher dissolved
oxygen (DO) to the effluent, as well as leaving a measurable residual to confirm the required
disinfection goals, both advantageous conditions for recycled water applications.
Successful implementation of this technology for Title 22 applications has been reported by
Applied Process Technologies (APT) and their product known as the HiPOx® reactor. Data from
prior applications indicate that when the objective is achieving disinfection equivalent to the
irradiation of a 100 mJ/cm2 UV dose, the HiPOx reactor can achieve this same objective in a
more cost effective manner. To accommodate the plant extension during the second phase of this
project, the capacity of the proposed reactor can be easily doubled to 100,000 gpd (nominal) by
using a pipeline array extension and an extra ozone generator. An extra generator may be also
added later for redundancy. The selected ozone reactor has two more important advantages over
UV:
• Substantial improvement to effluent water quality, especially with respect to odor and
color.
• Removal of trace contaminants, such as endocrine disruptors (EDCs), and pharmaceutical
and personal care products (PPCPs), especially when used in conjunction with hydrogen
peroxide for advanced oxidation (AOP)

The design specifications for APT’s HiPOx ozonation system are shown in Table 8. Detailed
specifications and calculations for the ozonation equipment are shown in Appendix F.
Table 8 – Specifications for APT’s HiPOx Ozonation System
Parameter Value
Manufacturer & Model APT
Model HiPOx
Design Flow-rate (MGD) 0.13
Expected Ozone Demand (mg/L) 4.0
Desired Ozone Residual (mg/L) 0.5
Contact Time (mg-L/min) 1.0
Total Ozone Dose - Transferred (mg/L) 5.0
Total Ozone Requirement - daily, with contingency (ppd) 5.4
Liquid Oxygen Requirements (ft3/d) 1.4
Number of Ozone Generators (including standby) 2
Power Requirements (kW) 15
Scope of Supply and Equipment Warranty

The following equipments will be provided as skid-mounted system, pre-assembled, pre-tested,
and fully automated as much as possible:
• Ozone dissolution system (injection point, mixers) with pipeline contactor
• Influent flow conveyance (pump, flow meter, manual control valve)
• Ozone generator (air-cooled ozone generator)
• Control panel with PLC/OIT
• Off-gas collection system (vent valve, ozone destruct)
• Dissolved ozone residual analyzer
ULTRAVIOLET DISINFECTION
The TrojanUVFit™ is an UV system from Trojan Technologies for wastewater reuse and high
level disinfection applications. The TrojanUVFitTM system is ideal for piped systems and
delivers effective chemical-free disinfection in a pressurized reactor. This configuration is well-
suited for media or membrane filtered effluent where effluent is already under pressure. The UV
system uses low-pressure high intensity amalgam lamps to provide an energy-efficient solution.
The proposed UV system has a compact reactor design which minimizes footprint and headloss
while ensuring that maintenance activities such as lamp replacement are is performed quickly
and safely.

The design specifications for the proposed UV disinfection system are shown in Table 9 and
detailed information/specifications for the proposed UV system are shown in Appendix G. Since
the ozone system will be designed for both color removal as well as disinfection, the UV system
will be designed and operated at a minimum dose. The UV transmittance (UVT) is expected to
be higher (80%) since the water is treated with membrane and ozone before being passed to the
UV system. In the event of membrane integrity failure or ozone system failure, the WRF effluent
pumps (to the clearwell) will be turned off. Since the MBR and ozonation system (combined)
will be designed to meet Title 22 standards, the UV system will be operated at a minimal dose of
40 mJ/cm2.
Table 9 – Design Specifications for TrojanUVFit UV Disinfection System
Parameter Value
Manufacturer Trojan Technologies
Model TrojanUVFit - 04AL20
UV Transmittance 80% minimum
Total Suspended Solids (mg/L) 5
Design UV Dose (mJ/cm2) 40
Number of SS316L Reactors 1
Number of Lamps per Reactor Chamber 4
Sleeve Wiping Automatic Mechanical
Power Requirements (kW) 2

• Trojan Technologies warrants all components of the system (excluding UV lamps)
against faulty workmanship and materials for a period of 12 months from date of start-up
or 18 months after shipment, whichever comes first.
• UV lamps purchased are warranted for 12,000 hours of operation or 3 years from
shipment, whichever comes first. The warranty is pro-rated after 9,000 hours of
operation. This means that if a lamp fails prior to 9,000 hours of use, a new lamp is
provided at no charge.
• Electronic ballasts are warranted for 5 years, pro-rated after 1 year.
ODOR CONTROL
The new WRF is intended to be a high profile demonstration project. The facility is surrounded
by high use public buildings and open spaces. Thus the complete capture and treatment of odors
and the prevention of any foul odors from the facility impacting the public is an essential part of
making the WRF successful.
All odor control systems contain the following elements:

• Ventilation of working areas:
• Capture and collection of foul air;
• Treatment of the air to remove odorous compounds; and
• Exhaust of the treated air.
All four of these elements play a key role in preventing odor impacts to the public.
Regulatory Requirements
The following laws and agencies regulate various portions of the odor control and emission
process:
• City of Anaheim municipal code – odorous emissions
• South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) – emissions
• National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) – ventilation of process areas; and
• Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) – ventilation of worker occupied
areas.
Chapter 18.48 of NFPA Standard 820 governs operations of recycling facilities. Section 060
paragraph 140 states the following:
“All uses shall be conducted in a manner so as not to be objectionable by reason of noise, odor,
dust, fumes, smoke, vibrations, or other similar causes.”
The NFPA Standard 820 provides standards of ventilation established to prevent fire and
explosion within wastewater treatment facilities. The ventilation rates for various areas of
WWTPs depend on the type of electrical equipment used in those areas. The Anaheim WRF
facility will be completely enclosed in a single building. The anoxic, aeration, and post anoxic
areas will be in tanks below the building and there will be openings between the areas the rest of
the building. The NFPA ventilation standard for enclosed aeration zones is 12 air changes per
hour if the electrical equipment has a National Electrical Code (NEC) rating of Division 2 Class I
Group D. If the equipment is rated Division 1 there are no ventilation requirement. While the
mixing equipment in the anoxic zones may be Division 1 rated, all of the equipment in the
working areas of the building will be Division 2. Thus a minimum ventilation rate of 12 air
changes per hour throughout the building may be required.
NFPA also has standards for the odor control areas. With Division 2 electrical equipment a
minimum of six air changes per hour in the areas out to three feet surrounding any potential leak.
Because the odor control area is not isolated from the rest of the facility the12 air changes per
hour standard discussed above will govern.
OSHA does not provide specific ventilation standards but rather sets limits for worker exposure
to specific compounds. In wastewater treatment applications hydrogen sulfide is the most
common among these compounds. Worker exposure to hydrogen sulfide is limited to 20 ppm.
Most of the process equipment such as the screen and MBR are self contained equipment and
will be ventilated. The anoxic, aeration and post anoxic areas are tanks below the floor of the
building. The only access to these areas will be through hatches in the floor. This configuration
of the tanks and the limited access means these areas must be governed by the rules of confined
space entry. Confined space entry requires workers to have respirators and thus the OASHA
limits for concentration of hydrogen sulfide do not apply in these areas. As confined spaces
these areas will have to be equipped with the following gas detectors and associated alarms
located at the entrances:
• Hydrogen sulfide;
• Oxygen; and
• Methane.
Ventilation and Emission Capture/Collection

In addition to the regulatory requirements discussed above there are other considerations in the
sizing and arrangement of the ventilation and air collection systems. The foremost concern at the
WRF is to prevent odors from escaping the facility and impacting the public in the surrounding
areas. Process equipment in the building such as the inlet screen and MBR will be self contained
and ventilated. The equipment will have small maintenance hatches that will need to remain
closed for operation.
Each anoxic and aeration tank will have a single three by three foot access hatch. Each post
anoxic tanks will have two of these hatches. At least one of these hatches for each tank will need
to be open occasionally and possibly be left open for extended periods. It is vital that enough air
be pulled down through the hatches when they are open to prevent odors from escaping. For
hatches located inside a building away from suction caused by wind passing over the hatches a
capture velocity of 100 ft/min will be sufficient to prevent odor from escaping the tanks.
Table 10 outlines the ventilation requirements for the various process equipment and areas as
well as the sizing criteria. Detailed sizing calculations for odor control are shown in
Appendix H.
Table 10 – Ventilation Requirements for Various Process Equipments
Area/Equipment Sizing Criteria Required Airflow

Inlet screen 12 ACH inside screen 11 cfm
Anoxic Tank 1 and 2 100 ft/min capture velocity 1,800 cfm
across the opening of one hatch
per tank
Aeration Tanks 1 and 2 100 ft/min capture velocity 1,800 + 400 = 2,200 cfm
per tank plus the maximum
amount of aeration air added to
each tank
Post Anoxic Tanks 1 and 2 100 ft/min capture velocity 1,800 cfm
per tank
MBR Scour air 130 cfm
Odor Control Area 6 ACH in the area surrounding 520 cfm
the collection fans and
treatment equipment (a total
foot print of 26’ x 20’ x 10’ high)
Total 6,461 cfm
The total volume of the building is approximately 254,000 ft3. The required airflow to achieve
12 air changes per hour in the building is 4,875 cfm. The air collected from the process areas
will need to be gathered from the building in order to provide the capture velocity across the
hatch openings. Thus the process air collection of approximately 6,500 cfm is greater than the
minimum 4,875 cfm required for 12 air changes per hour in the building. The odor control
system will be sized for 6,500 cfm which will provide approximately 16 air changes per hour in
the building.
In addition to the amount of air collected the location of the inlets for makeup air and the
collection points are important. The following are general good engineer practice when locating
makeup air inlets and foul air collection points:
Whenever possible enclose the odors and collect foul air as close to the odors source as possible;
• Drag fresh air past worker areas;
• Avoid pulling foul air past worker areas; and
• Avoid short circuiting the collection of odors by placing the collection port too close to
the makeup air inlet.
In the proposed ventilation scheme fresh air will be introduced into the building through roof
mounted inlets. This air will become the makeup air for the tanks and will be introduced to the
tanks through louvered intakes located near the hatches. Air will be collected from the tanks at
the opposite end of the tanks from the inlets. Air will also be collected from the inlet screen and
the MBR directly. Air will be collected from near the floor in the odor control area. This
collection point will be located as far away from the overhead door as possible. This scheme
incorporates all of the four elements listed above and will provide vital capture of odors thus
preventing them from escaping the facility when doors or hatches are opened.
Foul Air Treatment

There is a wide variety of odor control technologies available but these can be grouped into the
following general types:
• Absorption filters – carbon and iron sponge filers;

• Biofilters – organic and inorganic media filters;
• Biotrickling filters and bioscrubbers;
• Wet chemical scrubbers;
• Chemical dosing of the wastewater; and
• Regenerative thermal oxidation.
Of these technologies biotrickling filters, bioscrubbers, wet chemical scrubber and chemical
dosing of the wastewater can be eliminated from consideration. Biotrickling filters, bioscrubbers
and wet chemical scrubbers generally target hydrogen sulfide with some removal of other
odorous compounds. Thus they do not provide the highest level of odor reduction. In this
application and location the highest level of odor removal is essential. In addition chemical
scrubbers require frequent delivery of caustic chemicals that require operator training and special
handling. Given the close proximity to the high traffic public areas such chemical deliveries
would be impractical and undesirable.
Several different chemicals can be dosed into the wastewater flow to prevent the formation and
release of odorous compounds. These chemicals generally target hydrogen sulfide generation
but will reduce other sulfide compounds depending on the chemical used. However, as with wet
chemical scrubbers, many of these compounds are corrosive or otherwise harmful and require
care in handling and storage. Again the proximity of the facility to the general public makes the
delivery, storage and use of such chemicals impractical and undesirable.
Treatment Technologies
Iron sponges can also be eliminated from consideration. These filters collect hydrogen sulfide
and leave other odorous compounds in the air stream thus not achieving the maximum odor
removal.
Regenerative thermal oxidizers (RTOs) are very effective in removing a wide range of odorous
compounds, however they are seldom used in wastewater application. The foul airstream is wet
and relatively cool. The energy required to achieve compound destruction in an RTO makes
their cost of operation prohibitive.
The two remaining technologies are biofilters and carbon filters. Both are very effective at
removing odors but they function very differently. In a biofilter odorous compounds are
absorbed into a thin moisture layer on the surface of the media. The compounds are then
oxidized by microorganisms in the moisture layer. The byproducts are mineral salts, carbon
dioxide and water. Depending on the material used for the media there can be a residual odor
from the media itself. This is true of organic media biofilters that are composed mostly of wood
or bark nuggets. Biofilter require a relatively large footprint compared to other control
technologies. For the Anaheim WRF a minimum footprint of approximately 1,100 ft2 would be
required. In addition the media must be replaced every three years and this generally requires
the use of earth moving equipment. This type periodic operation is not well suited to the WRF
location.
In an activated carbon filter odorous compounds are adsorbed onto surface of the carbon media.
The media has high porosity which provides an enormous amount of available adsorption surface
area. There are three generic types of carbon media, Plain carbon also known as virgin carbon,
caustic impregnated carbon and catalytic carbon. Both catalytic and impregnated carbon are
treated to improve their ability to remove hydrogen sulfide and thus extend the life of the carbon
in airstreams with high concentrations of hydrogen sulfide. Plain or virgin carbon is better suited
for light hydrogen sulfide loading and higher VOC removal.
Hydrogen sulfide is normally found in the early stages of wastewater treatment. At the WRF
most of the hydrogen sulfide would be expected to be released from the inlet screen and the
anoxic tanks. These areas represent about 30% of the total air collected in the facility. Thus
there is ample dilution of any hydrogen sulfide collected. For this application where maximum
odor reduction is required, removal of the greatest number of volatile compounds will provide
the best overall odor removal.
There are several advantages to carbon filters. They have a small footprint, and are completely
enclosed in a vessel. The major drawback to carbon filters is the need to frequently replace the
media. However the replacement process is relatively neat compared to that of a biofilter.
Table 11 and Table 12 list the advantages and disadvantages of biofilters and carbon filter
respectively:
Table 11 - Advantages and Disadvantages a biofilter

Advantages Disadvantages
Less frequent media replacement Large foot print
Highly effective odor removal Residual odor from media
Inexpensive operation Heavy equipment required for media
replacement and replacement is messy
More frequent oversight required for
irrigation and weed control
Table 12 - Advantages and disadvantages of the carbon filters

Advantages Disadvantages
Smaller footprint More frequent media replacement
Highly effective odor removal Very high media cost but less media
Completely enclosed required
Easier and cleaner media replacement
Based on the above analysis the small footprint, enclosed vessels and the neater maintenance
make the carbon filter the clear choice for the Anaheim WRF.
Exhaust of Treated Air

The air exhausting from the carbon filters will be highly treated and have very little odor.
However, it must be noted that no odor control system can produce 100% odor free air 100% of
the time. There can be upsets in operation normal reductions in removal efficiency just before
the media must be replaced. There is a backup unit in place to provide continual treatment
during maintenance operation.
The odor control system will be a carbon filter system with plain or virgin carbon media. The
system will treat 6,500 cfm. The system will have the following components:
• One duty carbon filter and one standby unit with each unit 10 feet in diameter. The
filter will have either two horizontal media beds each three feet thick as shown in
Figure 1.1 or a radial bed filter as shown in Figure 1.2.
• One duty fan and on standby fan to collect the foul air and send it through the carbon
filter. The fan will be rated for 6,500 cfm at16 in.w.c.
• Due to the limited space available the collection fans will be equipped with inlet boxes
to reduce turbulence entering the fan that would otherwise reduce the efficiency of the
fan operation.
ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS

This section describes the electrical and control systems for the WRF building.
Incoming Power to the Water Recycling Facility

MWH and the City of Anaheim Electrical Staff shall coordinate the work to provide an incoming
power feed to the new Water Recycling Facility (WRF) adjacent to City Hall East. The work
shall consist of the design and construction of conduits, wires, Motor Control Center, fittings and
other necessary appurtenances to furnish an incoming power feed to the site that is in compliance
with local City standards and the NEC.
The incoming electrical power feed shall originate from the existing Civic Center Main
Switchgear located south of the WRF. A 400 ampere circuit breaker, matching the existing
manufacturer, shall be installed in the available space within the Civic Center Main Switchgear.
The power wiring shall utilize an existing 5-inch conduit that originates from the Civic Center
Main Switchgear and runs to the Maintenance Room located in the Parking Structure east of City
Hall East. MWH and City of Anaheim Electrical Staff shall determine the exact routing of this
existing conduit and coordinate the location of where to intercept this raceway to continue its
routing to the new WRF. The incoming power feed shall be terminated at a Motor Control
Center (MCC) located within the WRF. The MCC shall be enclosed in a non walk-in NEMA 4X
enclosure to prevent the possibility of exposure to water and/or other harsh chemicals that may
be present in the building. The incoming power feed, designed by MWH and coordinated with
City of Anaheim Electrical Staff, shall power this MCC, which in turn, shall deliver power
throughout the WRF and the new Diversion Structure. MWH shall coordinate the proper
number and size of breakers, starters and panel boards provided within this MCC. Bus size and
approximately 20 percent extra space for future breakers and starters shall be designed to account
for future loads at the WRF.
Power for the site shall be distributed from the MCC (MCC) in the Electrical Room of the new
WRF. Electric power shall be distributed from the MCC to all equipment, valves and
instruments located in the WRF and new Diversion Structure. The equipment manufacturers
shall provide local control panels with their equipment which house the starters for their
respective equipment if possible. Otherwise starters and controls for this equipment shall be
located within the MCC. The MCC shall distribute auxiliary power to the WRF via a step down
transformer and 120/208, 3 phase lighting panel located within the MCC.
Communications to the WRF

All controls shall be hardwired or networked to a PLC within the WRF. This PLC shall be tied
into the existing City’s communication system via fiber optic using utilizing TCP/IP (Ethernet)
Protocol. The City of Anaheim already has an existing fiber optic network infrastructure. The
probable location for network interface will be to City Hall East which will be adjacent to the
WRF. Coordination with the City of Anaheim Telecom Group shall determine the exact location
for interfacing with the existing ethernet fiber optic system.
The fiber optic system shall provide two way communications with City Hall, Lenain Water
Treatment Plant and other locations as required. The WRF will be monitored remotely by City
staff at the Lenain Treatment Plant via SCADA. Alarms and control notifications will be sent to
the Lenain Treatment Plant and elsewhere as required.
Power Feed to Diversion Structure

Power to the Diversion Structure shall originate from the MCC within the WRF. The Variable
Frequency Drives and controls for these pumps shall be housed within this MCC. Each pump
within the diversion structure shall have a power feed in a 1” conduit from the Motor Control
Center to a local disconnect switch at the manhole. These local disconnect switches shall be
rated NEMA 4X due to the outside environment where they will be mounted. Another 1”
conduit shall be routed from the local disconnect switch to each pump within the diversion
structure.
Communications to the Diversion Structure

A PLC shall be provided at the Diversion Structure for communication interface with the WRF.
The City has standardized on General Electric RX3i PLCs which are capable of direct Ethernet
interface. All process parameters and alarms at the Diversion Structure shall interface with City’s
network via an Ethernet fiber optic link.
Power Feed to Booster Pump at City Hall West
MWH and the City of Anaheim Electrical Staff shall coordinate the work to provide power to a
small booster pump. The booster pump is responsible for boosting pressure to the toilets on
floors 2 through 11 in the City Hall West Building. There are two options to provide power to
this pump. The first option is to provide a starter in the existing Motor Control Center MCC-A,
located in the basement of the City Hall West Building. New conduit and wire shall be routed
from the Motor Control Center MCC-A to the booster pump through the ceiling. The controls
for this pump would be located at MCC-A. Another option would be to install a 480, 3-phase
breaker in Panel board LSLB located in the basement of the City Hall West Building, and route
new conduit and wire to a Local Control Panel near the pump. The controls for this pump would
be housed in this Local Control Panel.
Communications to the booster pump station

A PLC shall be provided at the Booster Pump Station for communication interface with the City
Hall West. All process parameters and alarms at the Booster Pump Station shall interface with
City’s network via an Ethernet fiber optic link.
The fiber optic link will probably interface directly to the nearest Remote Terminal Unit (RTU)
in City Hall West. Coordination with the City of Anaheim Telecom Group shall determine the
exact location for interfacing with the existing Ethernet fiber optic system.
STRUCTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
The City of Anaheim has formally adopted the 2007 California Building Code (CBC) with City
specific amendments. The structural design of RWBR WWTP will be governed by these codes.
In specific, the following list of codes will be used by MWH to complete the detailed structural
design.
• Concrete – ACI 350-06: Code requirements for Environmental Engineering Concrete
Structures
• Masonry – ACI 530-05: Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures
• Steel – AISC 13th Ed: Steel Construction Manual
The geotechnical design requirements and recommendations are forth coming. These
requirements and recommendations will set forth the design criteria lateral soils pressures,
allowable soils bearing pressures and the general site-specific Seismic design parameters.
The RWBR WWTP is to be constructed on the North-East corner of the existing City Hall
building. It will be placed in between the existing City Hall building and an existing electrical
duct bank. The new WWTP will be approximately 20 feet from the North wall of City Hall.
This close proximity to the existing City hall and the electrical duct bank will introduce some
challenges during the construction phase of the project. Based on the limited information
provided in the pre-design report, the construction excavation for the WWTP is expected to
extend below grade approximately 20 to 25 feet. Specially designed shoring will need to be
designed and installed to limit any settlement of the existing building, interruption of the
electrical duct bank and to keep the soils in place between the existing building and the new
construction. MWH recommends that a qualified shoring consultant be contracted by the

contractor to design and install this shoring once the final location and depth of the WWTP has
been determined and in accordance with the design parameters that will be specified in the
geotechnical report.
APPENDICES:
A: Water Quality Results from Lab

B: WRF Plant Layout and Process Flow Diagram
C: Information and Specifications for Fine Screen
D: Equipment Sizing Calculations and BioWin Modeling Results
E: Information and Specifications/Warranty for Norit/Dynatec Membrane System
F: Information, Specifications and Calculations for Ozonation System
G: Information and Specifications for UV System
H: Calculations for Odor Control System
HISTORY:
Draft Issued: 08/07/09
APPENDIX A
Water Quality Results from Lab
APPENDIX B
WRF Plant Layout, Process Flow Diagram, Equipment List and Preliminary
Chemical Volume Calculations
1’-0" 1’-0"
58’-8"
REVISIONS
-0"
30’-5" 28’-3"
1’
BY
M ARK DATE
SUMP
CHEMICAL
DESIGN
DRAW N
STORAGE
CH ECK
MICRO-C CITRIC
pH MIXER
FEED HYPO ACID
SINK
vd
19900 M acArthur Bl
nc.
T: (714) 328- 2400

cas, I
ne, CA 92612
M W H Am eri
te 900
Sui
rvi
I
AC
DRUM ODOR ODOR
SCREEN CONTROL CONTROL
MIXER
FAN FAN
TRANS
PROCESS PUMP
ROLL UP DOOR
BLOWERS
N
-0"
FOUNTAI
30’
CLEARW ELL
MEMBRANE
BLOWERS
REUSE PUMPS
OF AN AH EIM
PERM EATE
TRANS
PUMP
PUM PS
MIXER MBR SKID
UV
CITY
OZONE
FEED TANK/
4
BW PUMPS/
UP
-
OZONE FD
PUMPS
OZONE SKID
ect
3
on Proj
2
an
MIXER DESK
MCC MCC
calPl
rat
ng Dem onst
1
Mechani
-0"
1’
0 NCHES
i
Recycl
N I
NAL SCALE I
STORAGE BELOW
STAIRS
MECHANICAL PLAN
SCALE: 3/8" = 1’-0"
SHEET DRAWING
GI
of
O RI
MWH Equipment / Motor List
Lancaster WRP Stage Five Plant Expansion
B C D E F G H J N O P Q S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ
1 Revision: 0 Prepared By: JGC/CDG Checked By:
2 Revision: Prepared By: Checked By:
3 EQUIPMENT LIST WITH MOTORS Revision: Prepared By: Checked By:
6
7 PHASE I (0.08 MGD) PHASE 2 (0.13 MGD)
8 Connected Duty Ave. Ops. Average Connected Duty Ave. Ops. Average Motor Comments
Rev Seq Unit Sub- Major Sub- Sub-Process Description Equipment Desciption Equip Motor Supply Thermal Moisture Number HP / unit Total Number Total Factor Load Number HP / unit Total Number Total Factor Load (Note 1)
Station Process process Protection Sensor
Dsgntr Encl. Voltage Type
9
10 Influent Pump Station Influent Pumps P TEFC 480 Y Y 2 1.5 3 1 1.5 1 1.5 2 3 6 1 3 1 3 VFC Non-Clog Sewer Pump 60HZ
11 Fine Screen Station Fine screen SC TEFC 480 N N 1 1 1 1 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 1 0.75 0.75 CS
12 Anoxic Tanks Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixers MX TEFC 480 Y Y 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 2 3 6 2 6 1 6 CS
13 Aeration Tanks Internal Recycle Pumps P TEFC 480 Y Y 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 4 2 4 1 4 VFC
14 Aeration Tanks Process Blower BL TEFC 480 N N 2 7.5 15 1 7.5 1 7.5 3 7.5 22.5 2 15 1 15 VFC
15 Post Anoxic Tanks Post Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixers MX TEFC 480 Y Y 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 4 2 4 1 4 CS
16 Post Anoxic Tanks Membrane Feed Pumps P TEFC 480 Y Y 1 7.5 7.5 1 7.5 1 7.5 2 7.5 15 2 15 1 15 VFC
17 MBR Membrane Blower BL TEFC 480 N N 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 2 3 6 2 6 1 6 CS Connected as power suply to panel: 1 phase, 60 HZ
18 MBR Membrane Permeate Pumps P TEFC 480 Y Y 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 VFC
19 MBR Backwash Pump P TEFC 480 Y Y 1 1 1 1 1 0.03 0.03 1 1 1 1 1 0.06 0.06 CS
20 Ozone Treatment Ozone Skid OZ TEFC 230 Y Y 1 30 30 1 30 1 30 2 30 60 2 60 1 60 NA Connected as power supply to panel: 230 v, 100 A, 1 phase
21 UV Disinfection UV Skid UV TEFC 240 Y Y 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 NA
22 Clearwell Water Reuse Pumps P TEFC 480 Y Y 2 5 10 1 5 1 5 2 15 30 1 15 1 15 VFC Non-Clog Sewer Pump 60HZ, 3 phase
23 Odor Control Station Blowers BL TEFC 480 N N 2 30 60 1 30 1 30 2 30 60 1 30 1 30 CS 6000 cfm, 27 BHP, Pressure: 14" WC
24 COD Feed Station Sugar Feed Pump P TEFC 120 N N 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0 0 SCR Drive 3 AMP
25 pH System Feed Station PH Feed Pump P TEFC 120 N N 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0 0 SCR Drive 3 AMP
26 Chlorine Station Chlorine Feed Pumps P TEFC 120 N N 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 1 0.25 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 1 0.25 SCR Drive 3 AMP
27 Citric Acid Station Citric Acid Feed Pumps P TEFC 120 N N 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0 0 1 0.25 0.25 1 0.25 0 0 CS 3 AMP
28 Building Misc Auxillary Loads NA TEFC 480 N N 1 45 45 1 45 0.5 22.5 1 45 45 1 45 0.5 22.5 NA 45 kva transformer
29 Building Misc Roll Up Door NA TEFC 480 N N 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 CS
• Air Handling Unit - 6,000 cfm @ 1.0” w.c. External Static Pressure, 5 hp and 460V-3P
60Hz
• Circulating Pump - 32 gpm @ 40 ft TDH, ¾ hp and 460V-3Ph-60Hz
• Electric Unit Heater- 15 KW capacity and 460V-3Ph-60Hz (Typical of 2).
30 Building Misc Air Conditioning Unit AC TEFC 480 Y N 1 10 10 1 10 0.5 5 1 10 10 1 10 0.5 5 CS
31 Building Misc Air Compressor C TEFC 480 N N 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.3 0.15 1 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0.5 0.25 CS
32
33 TOTAL (hp) PHASE 1 198 155 123.93 PHASE 2 277 221.5 191
34
35 Total (kW) 148 116 92 207 165 142
36
37 Total (kVA) 185 144 116 258 206 178
38
39
\\7.3\CALC_Equipment List_Rev 1.xlsx Overall Page 1 of 1

ANAHEIM DEMO RECYCLE PLANT
MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
7/16/2009 Calc. By: Z. Hirani

Checked By: J. Ciccotelli
Checked Date: 7/17/2009
INTRODUCTION
Chlorine and citric acid calcs for cleaning membranes
Acetic acid calcs for determing external carbon addition to reduce nitrate concentration
Activated carbon calcs for odor control
Residual chlorine calcs
Chlorine for cleaning membrane Comments
Stock chlorine concentration 12.5 % 125000 mg/L
Desired concentration of chlorine 1000 mg/L
Volume of chlorine required per module 45 gallons 170.1 L
Number of membrane modules to be cleaned 20
Total volume of cleaning solution 882 gallons 3335 L
Volume of stock solution to use per cleaning 7 gallons
Cleaning frequency 4 per month
Total stock solution to store for 1 month 28 gallons
Tote volume 55 gallons
No. totes on site 1 tote
Citric Acid for cleaning membrane
Stock citric acid concentration 100 %
Desired concentration of citric acid 1000 mg/L
Volume of citric acid required per module 45 gallons 170.1 L
Number of membrane modules to be cleaned 20
Total volume of cleaning solution 882 gallons 3335 L
Mass of stock concentration to use per cleaning 3.3 kg 7.3 lbs
Cleaning frequency 4 per month
Total stock solution to store for 1 month 29 lbs
Powdered bag size 55 lbs
No. bags on site 1 bags
Acetic Acid (CH3COOH) to further reduce nitrate
Stock acetic acid concentration 20 % 200000 mg/L
COD value of stock solution 214000 mg/L
Nitrate to be reduced 4 mg/L-N
COD/NO3-N ratio 6
Nitrate to be removed per day 1965600 mg/d
COD required per day 11793600 mg/d
Volume of COD required per day 15 gallons
Volume of stock acetic acid required per day 14 gallons
No. days storage 14 days

Total stock solution for storage period 191 gallons
Activated Carbon Calcs
Air flow-rate to be treated 500 cfm
Contact time per vessel 5 seconds 0.08 min
Approximate volume required 41.7 ft3
Face velocity criteria 20 ft/min max
Area of vessel 25.0 ft2
Diameter of vessel 5.6 ft
Selected diameter 6 ft
Media depth 1.7 ft
Selected Media depth 3 ft
Specific gravity of activated carbon 0.5
Density of activated carbon 30 lb/ft3 480.6 kg/m3
Actual volume of activated carbon 85 ft3
Mass of activated carbon required 2543 lbs
Residual Chlorine Calcs
Flow to be chlorinated 0.13 MGD 130000 gpd
Stock chlorine concentration 12.5 % 125000 mg/L
Desired concentration of chlorine dose 2 mg/L
Chlorine injection flow-rate 2.08 gpd
MicroC to further reduce nitrate
COD value of stock solution 670000 mg/L Obtained from vendor
Nitrate to be reduced 4 mg/L-N
COD/NO3-N ratio 6
Nitrate to be removed per day 1965600 mg/d
COD required per day 11793600 mg/d
Volume of stock solution required per day 5 gallons
END CALCULATION
APPENDIX C
Information and Specifications for Fine Screen
The Waste Tech Rotating Drum Screen incorporates a feed distribution headbox for effective
flow distribution and an internally screw auger with individual dewatering cells which dewaters and
transports the separated solids out of the drum. Depending on the size of the screen the drum is
direct drive, cog gear drive or trunnion driven. The influent is controlled into the drum by means
of various inlet pipe designs, selection based on the type of material processed, which distributes
the influent over a large area of the drum to ensure efficient use of the drum open area. As the
drum rotates fluids pass through the perforations and forward to treatment. Solids are removed
and dewatered from the drum by the fixed transport screw.
The Perforated Screen is effectively cleaned by means of a friction drive rotating brush and
intermittent spray system. The Waste Tech RDS is fully enclosed with removable inspection covers
to prevent splashing and leaks and are designed to create a hygienic working environment in
the area the screens are located and comes standard equipped with a pipe connection for odor
control.
When combined with our screenings washer press fitted with drainage perforations matching the
drum perforation we can guarantee matching capture efficiency of solids to prevent bypass of solids to the downstream process.
Screenings are washed and compacted to 80%+ volume reduction
Special Features:
• Automatic Integral Overflow System (IOS) with alarm indication to prevent dirty influent from contaminating the filtered effluent.
Separate overflow connection allows dirty flow to be diverted to back to the pump station.
• IOS System automatically activates spray system with hot or cold water to wash away biological slimes, grease, etc….
• Various influent distribution pipe designs for specific applications
• The enclosed perforated drum screen has no seals or slots – all flow must pass
through the perforations – therefore we can guarantee no bypass or carryover of
solids to the downstream process.
• Special perforation design and cleaning system allow perforations down to 0.6mm
guaranteed not to clog with screenings.
• Low water usage due to special designed drum cleaning system – water is the
secondary cleaning method, not the primary cleaning method
• Perforated drum available from 3 mm to 0.6 mm
• The Waste Tech RDS stainless steel perforated drums are stronger and more efficient than wedge wire or mesh drum screens
• Operator Safety – all rotating parts are covered and the unit is totally enclosed to prevent contact with material.
• All removable covers are bolted down or fitted with safety switches to detect removal
• Combined with our screenings washer press provides a complete high performance screenings capture, washing and dewatering
system
Special Applications:
Membrane Biological Reactors (MBR)
• Effectively removes short chain fibers that create ropes which hang on the hollow fiber membranes and reduce efficiency causing
frequent back flushing and failure of the membranes.
• Waste-Tech RDS with 1 mm perforations are ideal for screening raw sewage ahead of MBR plants. Waste-Tech RDS efficiently
remove up to +95% inert solids, including fibers and hair. Waste-Tech RDS with 0.6 mm to 3 mm perforations offer flow capacities
up to 50 mgd (larger capacities available).
• Guarantee no carryover of solids
Sludge Thickener
• By adding polymer to waste activated sludge (WAS) or mixed primary
and secondary sludges, a Waste Tech RDS can dewater the sludge
from 0.5 -2% DS to 4-10% DS. This will save money on less transport
or by using a lower capacity belt press.
Typical Applications
• The Waste Tech RDS is also used in a variety of other applications
including: - Raw Sewage Screen, Sludge dewatering, Pulp and
Paper Mills, Fiberglass, Poultry, Fish Processing, Vegetable Preparation,
Slaughterhouses – any application requiring liquid solids separation
between 0.6 mm to 3 mm
All models are of stainless steel and have the following options:
• optional hole perforation from 0.6 mm (0.02 inches) to 3 mm

(0.12 inches)
• varying types of inlet pipes for water or sludge
• with or without overflow system
• varying speeds
• variable inclines available
• low weight and small footprint
• low energy consumption
• low water usage
• 304, 316 stainless steel – special alloys available
• hygienically encased with optional ventilation connection
Screen Model Length (mm) Width (mm) Height (mm) HP (kw)

RDS-9 48.5 (1230) 23.5 (600) 40 (1020) 1/3 (0.25)
RDS-30 71 (1810) 34.5 (880) 51 (1290) 1/2 (0.37)
RDS-90 109 (2770) 34.5 (880) 59 (1500) 3/4 (0.55)
RDS-135 114 (2900) 49 (1250) 75 (1900) 3/4 (0.55)
RDS-290 157 (3990) 62 (1570) 94.5 (2400) 1.5 (1.1)

*Dimensions are to the nearest 0.5 inch
101 Zima Park Drive (29301)
P.O. Box 6128
Spartanburg, SC 29304, USA
Ph: 864.576.0660 • Fax: 864.587.5761
www.kuesterszima.com
For additional information call

847.367.5150 or 864.587.5714
ROTOSIEVEFILTER DRUM SCREEN
SPECIFICATION
1. GENERAL
The Contractor shall furnish and install one (1) Model No. RDS –OF- 30 ROTOSIEVE
ROTARY DRUM SCREEN suited for screening wastewater from a process plant. Each
unit shall be a rotating screen which is internally fed. The rotating action of the screen
shall cause the captured solids to roll up into an agglomerate which shall be conveyed to
the discharge end of the screen by internal flights.
The screen assembly shall include a perforated cylindrical screen element, splash guards,
inlet headbox assembly, base frame, trunnion wheels, drive system, internal/external
sprays, covers, collection pan, and solids discharge chute.
The screen shall be capable of treating a wastewater flow of up to 0.150 mgd at a

maximum suspended solids concentration of 400 mg/L.
Screens shall be as manufactured by Waste-Tech div of Kusters Zima Corporation,

Spartanburg, S.C. or approved equal.
The supplier (equipment manufacturer) shall furnish the equipment described above.
2. SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT
All equipment furnished shall be subject to the approval of the Owner.
Proposals shall include delivery of equipment, freight allowed to the job site, and services
of the manufacturer’s representative to assist the Contractor in the installation,
adjustment, and testing the installed equipment, and to instruct the Owner’s operating
personnel in the proper operation and maintenance of the equipment.
3. FIELD SERVICE AND ACCEPTANCE TESTING

Each supplier shall include in his proposal, their services of a field service technician for
one (1) trip totaling two (2) working days. This service shall be for the purpose of
checkout, initial startup, certification of the equipment, and training the Owner’s
operating personnel.
A written report covering the technician’s findings and installation approval shall be
submitted to the Owner. Voltage, current, and other significant parameters shall be
recorded. The supplier shall provide all formal test procedures, forms for recording data,
and any special test apparatus required. All labor and common materials necessary for
conducting the tests shall be furnished by the Owner.
ROTOSIEVE PERFORATED DRUM SCREEN – MODEL RDS-OF-30 PAGE 2
SPECIFICATION
4. INFORMATION REQUIRED WITH SUBMITTAL

The equipment manufacturer shall include descriptive literature, dimensional prints of all
components described herein, and performance data in sufficient detail to fully describe
the equipment being offered. Failure to supply sufficient information to evaluate the bid
will be cause for rejection of equipment.
5. CORROSION CONTROL
The fine screens may be subjected to corrosive conditions. The main concern involves
continuous exposure to anaerobic wastewater, containing significant concentrations of
dissolved sulfides. Various forms of chlorine and chlorides may also be present, both in
the main flow and in the screen spray water.
In order to reduce the potential for corrosion, the screens shall be fabricated from 304
stainless steel. The only non-stainless components allowed shall be those so described
later.
Two (2) possible concerns remain regarding fabrication procedures:
1. Possible contamination of stainless steel through use of mild steel cleaning

brushes; to this end, no wire brushing shall be allowed during fabrication; and
2. Potential corrosion at welds; to this end, all welds shall be passivated.
Passivation shall consist of the following:
1. Removal of oil, grease and other foreign matter from the weld and heat affected
zone.
2. Bathing in ten molar (10 M) nitric acid until the area is cleansed.
3. Flushing with clear water and inspection to verify that the passivated surface is
clean and has a dulled or slightly roughed appearance. “Paste passivation” will
not be acceptable.
In the event the Owner does not observe fabrication, the manufacturer shall certify that
these measures have been followed without exception.
SPECIFICATION
6. SCREEN ASSEMBLY
The screening element shall be a perforated cylinder, constructed of type 304 stainless
steel. Each end of the screen elements shall be fitted with a type 304 stainless steel end
ring welded to the screen element substructure throughout the circumference. End rings
shall be 10 gauge with a minimum thickness of 0.135" and have stiffening flanges welded
around their circumference. One (1) end ring shall be at the discharge end and be
designed with an extended bellmouth to provide effective discharge of dewatered solids
away from the base of the unit. Each end ring shall also include a steel track area
specifically designed to be supported by the trunnion wheel assemblies. The drum is
directly driven by a gear motor coupled to the drum via a flexible coupling. The
screening element perforations shall be a nominal 0.80 mm (0.031 inches).
The screen element shall be equipped with type 304 stainless steel flights. Flights
arranged in a helical pattern throughout the length of the screen causing the solids to
continually move towards the discharge end. The diverter height shall be a minimum of
0.50". The flights shall be designed to structurally strengthen the perforated cylinder and
make it suitable for the intended duty.
7. BASE FRAME AND LOWER COLLECTION PAN

The base frame shall be constructed of type 304 stainless steel sections, and shall be
accurately fabricated to provide a mounting surface for the screen assembly. The frame
shall be designed to withstand all loads imposed by the screen components plus
wastewater passing through the unit. The base shall also be designed in such a way to
allow for four-point support without the linear deflection exceeding 0.0014.
Four (4) anchor bolt holes ad four (4) lifting lugs shall be incorporated in the base.
Anchor bolt assemblies shall be 304 stainless steel and shall be furnished by the
Contractor.
If required a method of changing the perforated screen cylinder angle of inclination shall
be provided to raise the screenings discharge end of the screen from 00 to a max of 60.
Standard installation angle will be 60. The increase or decrease of the screen cylinder
slope shall be made possible without dismantling or disassembling the piping to and from
the screen.
SPECIFICATION
8. TRUNNION
The trunnion wheel assembly shall be designed such that the wheel and/or sleeve bearing
may be replaced independently of the other wheel parts.
Cantilevered trunnions are not acceptable. The trunnions must be supported on each side.
a. The screen assembly shall be provided with two (2) trunnion wheels and trunnion
wheel mounting assemblies. The trunnion wheel assemblies shall be accurately
mounted to the base frame to provide positive horizontal placement of the screen
assembly.
b. Trunnion wheels shall be constructed of solid polyethylene or solid phenolic resin

mounted on stainless steel axles. Each wheel shall have a maximum outside
diameter of 10". Each wheel shall be supported by two (2) deep groove,
lubricated and sealed bearings. The wheel bearing assembly shall be an anti-
friction ball with inner race.
c. Support shafts shall be of type 304 stainless steel. Each shaft shall be accurately
positioned and secured by the trunnion mounting bracket.
d. Trunnion support brackets shall be fabricated of type 304 stainless steel plates.
Each bracket assembly shall be of type 304 stainless steel construction accurately
fabricated to interface with the support base. The bracket assembly shall be
designed to locate the trunnion support shafts and support the loads imposed by
the cylinder assembly.
9. INLET PIPE AND FLOW DISTRIBUTION BOX ASSEMBLY

All components of the piped inlet shall be fabricated of minimum 12 gauge type 304
stainless steel.
The piped inlet and flow distribution assembly shall be sized for a peak design flow of
0.150 mgd, as shown on the Waste-Tech div Kusters Zima Corporation general
arrangement drawing. Flow shall be controlled to provide smooth, uniform distribution.
An integral overflow shall be provided to detect an overflow condition during flow

periods exceeding the design flow, or if the screen should be inoperative for any reason
during flow to the screen. Overflow detection will be monitored conductivity probes. A
separate overflow pipe will be provided to separate overflow from the drum screen
effluent flow.
SPECIFICATION
10. SPLASH GUARDS

The screen shall be equipped with external splash guards constructed of minimum 12
gauge type 304 stainless steel. These guards shall be located on each side of the
screening element and attached to the base.
The splash guards shall be designed to contain and direct the entire flow through the
screen base discharge opening.
The splash guards shall have internal guided flow vanes. The use of rubber or rivets on
the splash guards shall not be allowed. The guards shall be designed to be easily
removed for maintenance or access purposes.
The splash guards shall be self-supporting throughout their entire length and shall also
support the weight of the external covers/hoods which mount on them.
11. COVER HOODS

A cover hood assembly shall be provided for each screen. Each cover hood will consist
of multiple sections each sized to facilitate handling by the operator or maintenance
personnel. Each section shall be sufficiently durable to withstand visual damage from
1" hailstones, and designed for a live load of 40 psf on horizontal projection plus 30 psf
wind load.
Each cover section shall be capable of being removed completely from the machine by
one operator. Each cover section shall be capable of being removed by a maximum of
one (1) operator.
Each section of the cover hood shall consist of a panel, plus support members, lift-off
hinge and locking assemblies.
Cover panels shall be fiberglass construction, with 0.125" minimum thickness. All resin
shall be chemical-resistant and shall contain light stabilizers such as UV-9, or equal.
Resin shall be suitable for service in temperatures ranging from 300F to 1400F.
Fiberglass reinforcement shall consist of a combination of shopped strand mat and woven
roving, shall be equal to PPG 526, and shall be treated with a finish compatible to the
resin being used.
Cover panels shall be formed on suitable molds to insure constant and accurate
dimensions of the finished units. Molds shall be designed so each panel can be cast in
one (1) piece without jointing members by bonding or bolting. All layers shall contain
pigment to produce a translucent panel. Standard color shall be pigmented blue.
SPECIFICATION
Stiffening angles, base brackets, inspection bars, and all assembly hardware shall be
type 18-8 stainless steel, and shall be die formed to insure accurate dimensions of the
finished units.
Cover hood assemblies shall fasten to and be supported by the splash guards located
below them. The 304 stainless steel fasteners shall be coordinated and furnished by the
screen manufacturer, who will also make the final assembly.
12. SOLIDS DISCHARGE CHUTE AND SCREEN END COVER.

Each screen shall include a heavy-duty type 304 stainless steel solids discharge chute.
The lower part of the chute shall fit closely beneath the screen discharge, so that all solids
are captured. The hopper chute shall extend downward. The chute shall converge to a
nominal 20 inches by 8 inches discharge opening and the converging sides shall be not
less than 600 from horizontal.
Bottom of the discharge chute is a reinforced with matching companion mounting holes;
stainless steel fasteners shall be provided for attaching a rubber extension chute; the
rubber extension chute shall be furnished by others.
13. SCREEN DRIVE

Each screen shall have a drive system consisting of an electric motor, gear reducer,
flexible drive coupling, and mating flexible drive coupling located and fixed externally
onto the drive end of the screen cylinder.
The motor shall be as manufactured by Reliance, NORD, or Baldor, rated for severe duty,
TEFC, 0.5 HP, 460V/3Ph/60Hz, with a minimum service factor of 1.15.
The motor shall be directly coupled to a flange mounted, parallel helical, double
reduction gear reducer. The reducer shall be as manufactured by NORD. The reducer
shaft shall be keyed to a drive shaft.
The drive assembly shall be mounted onto the 304 stainless steel screen frame and will be
equipped with an adjustment means to provide vibration free operation and minimum
wear.
SPECIFICATION
Drive assemblies which include chains, belts, pinions, sprockets, chain tensioners, or
chain oilers, will not be accepted.
14. SCREEN CLEANING SYSTEM

Each screen shall be provided with an external spray system and rotating horizontal
cleaner brush. As available, portable or plant water shall be supplied to the spray systems
at the required volume and pressure.
The removable external spray system shall consist of a 304 stainless steel spray header
provided with 304 stainless steel spray nozzles. The nozzles shall be easily accessible for
cleaning.
The nozzles shall operate on plant water (treated plant effluent or portable water) at 60
psi. Maximum simultaneous flow, at 60 psi shall be.15 gpm. Inlet connections to spray
header shall be 1” NPT.
The cleaner brush shall consist of a rotary nylon bristle mounted on a 304 stainless steel
shaft with pillow block bearings at each end. The brush located above the perforated
cylinder rotates in contact with the cylinder as it turns. The angular contact generated by
the unique shape of the brush cleans the perforations. The joint cleaning action of the
brush and the washwater sprays effectively maintains the open area of the screen cylinder
and prevents blinding.
Control Panel
The system shall be equipped with controls to provide both manual and automatic
operation. Controls shall be housed in a NEMA 4X enclosure complete with HOA
Switch for screen and Compactor, Screen and Compactor ON/OFF Lights, Screen and
Compactor Fail Lights, Overflow Alarm Light, Main Disconnect with panel mounted
disconnect lockable in the off position. All necessary starters, breakers, fuses, timers and
relays for Automatic and Manual Control.
15. EQUIPMENT STORAGE AND INSTALLATION

The supplier shall furnish, as part of shop drawing submittals, detailed instructions on
storage and installation of the fine screens.
The concrete screen structure shown on the plans is based on the Waste-Tech div of
Kusters Zima Corporation ROTOSIEVE Perforated Drum Screen..
SPECIFICATION
16. SPARE PARTS ) (available ex stock Spartanburg, SC)

The supplier shall furnish, boxed for storage and clearly marked, the following spare
parts: two (2) complete trunnion wheel assemblies.
17. ACCEPTANCE TESTING

The screen shall be fully assembled and run “dry” for a minimum of six (6) consecutive
hours at the manufacturer’s factory. Any mechanical defects or problems shall be
corrected prior to shipment. A certified report of compliance and of any corrective
actions shall be submitted to the Owner.
In addition, prior to shipment, the screens shall be thoroughly inspected to insure trouble-
free operation, proper interface, and adjustment of all components. The manufacturer
shall provide the Owner with a certified inspection report.
Finally, the screen shall be field tested prior to final acceptance; this shall entail operation
for several hours at the average wastewater flows. Then tested for operation at the peak
wastewater flow over a period of approximately 15 minutes.
APPENDIX D
Equipment Sizing Calculations and BioWin Modeling Results
EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCS
1 Internal Recycle Pump

2 Selected turnover flow 241.28 gpm
3 Nominal Pipe Diameter 8 in
4 Pipe Velocity 1.54 ft/s 1-2 ft/s
5 Piping distance 76 ft
6 Multiplication Factor for Clean Water 1
7 Nominal losses per 100-ft of piping 0.280 ft/100 ft
8 Piping losses 0.21 ft
9 Loss for 90 degree elbow 0.45
10 Number of Elbows 2.00
11 Loss for Tee 0.30
12 Number of Tees 1
13 Total K 1.20
14 Fitting losses 0.0442 ft
15 Elevation of Downstream water surface 34 ft
16 Elevation of Upstream water surface 15 ft 2 ft f/b
17 Change in water surface elevation 19 ft
18 System Head 15.00 ft
19 Mixing Pump Drive Motor 1.44 Hp
20 Selected Nominal Pump Motor 2.00 Hp
21
22 Membrane Feed Pump
23 Selected turnover flow 1,025.42 gpm
33 Number of Tees 1
34 Loss of Cross 1.71
35 Number of Crosses 5
36 Total K 10.37
39 Elevation of Upstream water surface 15 ft 2 ft f/b
44
45
46 Membrane Permeate Pump
57 Number of Tees 2
58 Total K 3.04
61 Elevation of Upstream water surface (4.62) ft
66
67 Backwash Pump
78 Number of Tees 3
79 Total K 2.70
82 Elevation of Upstream water surface 8.50 ft
86 Selected Nominal Pump Motor 25 Hp
87
88
89 MIXER SIZING CALCS
90
91 Train A - Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixer
92 Wetted Volume (gal) 13,400 gallons
93 Wetted Volume (ft3) 1,791 ft3
94 Mixer Design Power Input 1 hp/1000ft3
95 Mixer Shaft Power 1.79 hp
96 Motor Efficiency 0.90
97 Motor Safety Factor 1.20
98 Mixer Motor 2.39 hp
99 Selected Motor Size 3.00 hp
100
101
102 Train A - Post Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixer
111
112
113 Train B - Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixer
122
123
124 Train B - Post Anoxic Tank Submersible Mixer
133
134 Blower Calcs
135
136 Process Blower Calc
137 k 1.40
138 p1 14.70 psi
139 p1 2,116.22 psf
140 p2 21.51 psi
141 p2 3,098.04 psf
142 Constant 550.00 ft‐lbf/hp‐sec
143 V1 175.00 ft3/min
144 V1 2.92 ft3/sec
145 Pideal,hp ‐4.52
146 Efficiency 0.70
147 Pactual,hp ‐6.46
149
150 Membrane Blower Calc
151 k 1.40
152 p 1 14.70 psi
153 p 1 2,116.22 psf
154 p 2 21.51 psi
155 p 2 3,098.04 psf
156 Constant 550.00 ft‐lbf/hp‐sec
157 V1 60.00 ft3/min
158 V1 1.00 ft3/sec
159 Pideal,hp ‐1.55
160 Efficiency 0.70
161 Pactual,hp ‐2.21
BioWin user and configuration data
Project details
Project name: Anaheim - Water Recycling Demonstration Project
Plant name: Anaheim Demo Plant
8/7/2009
Steady state solution

Target SRT: 20 SRT: 20.03
Temperature: 15.0
Flowsheet
Influent Pre-Anoxic Aerobic Post-Anoxic Membrane Tank MBR Efflue
Waste Sludge
Configuration information for all Bioreactor units

Physical data
Element name Volume [Mil. Gal] Area [ft2] Depth [ft] # of diffusers
Membrane Tank 0.0009 10.0260 12.0 3
Post-Anoxic 0.0179 159.5255 15.0 Un-aerated
Pre-Anoxic 0.0260 231.7130 15.0 Un-aerated
Aerobic 0.0439 391.2384 15.0 89
Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required)

Element name Average DO Setpoint [mg/L]
Post-Anoxic 0
Pre-Anoxic 0
Aerobic 2.0
Element name Average Air supply rate [ft3/min (20C, 1 atm)]

Membrane Tank 130.0
File D:\Zakir's Stuff\City of Anaheim\BioWin Model\Anaheim MBR Single Recycle 08072009.bwc 1

Aeration equipment parameters
Element name k1 in C = k2 in C = Y in Kla = C Usg Area of one % of tank area
k1(PC)^0.25 + k2 k1(PC)^0.25 + k2 ^ Y - Usg in diffuser covered by
[m3/(m2 d)] diffusers [%]
Membrane Tank 1.0000 0.0432 0.6250 0.0410 15.0000
Post-Anoxic 2.5656 0.0432 0.7965 0.0410 20.0000
Pre-Anoxic 2.5656 0.0432 0.8200 0.0410 10.0000
Aerobic 2.5656 0.0432 0.8200 0.0410 10.0000
Operating data Average (flow/time weighted as required)

Element name Influent
Time 0
Flow 0.13
Total COD mgCOD/L 972.00
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mgN/L 75.00
Total P mgP/L 8.60
Nitrate N mgN/L 0
pH 7.90
Alkalinity mmol/L 10.40
Inorganic S.S. mgTSS/L 54.00
Calcium mg/L 63.00
Magnesium mg/L 20.00
Dissolved oxygen mg/L 0
Element name Influent

Fbs - Readily biodegradable (including Acetate) [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.1190
Fac - Acetate [gCOD/g of readily biodegradable COD] 0.1900
Fxsp - Non-colloidal slowly biodegradable [gCOD/g of slowly degradable COD] 0.6500
Fus - Unbiodegradable soluble [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0300
Fup - Unbiodegradable particulate [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.1000
Fna - Ammonia [gNH3-N/gTKN] 0.4800
Fnox - Particulate organic nitrogen [gN/g Organic N] 0.5000
Fnus - Soluble unbiodegradable TKN [gN/gTKN] 0.0200
FupN - N:COD ratio for unbiodegradable part. COD [gN/gCOD] 0.0350
Fpo4 - Phosphate [gPO4-P/gTP] 0.5470
FupP - P:COD ratio for influent unbiodegradable part. COD [gP/gCOD] 0.0110
FZbh - Non-poly-P heterotrophs [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0151
FZbm - Anoxic methanol utilizers [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZaob - Ammonia oxidizers [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZnob - Nitrite oxidizers [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZamob - Anaerobic ammonia oxidizers [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZbp - PAOs [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZbpa - Propionic acetogens [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZbam - Acetoclastic methanogens [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
FZbhm - H2-utilizing methanogens [gCOD/g of total COD] 0.0001
Album page - Table

Elements Total Volatile Total COD Total Total P Ammonia Nitrate N pH []
suspended suspended [mg/L] Kjeldahl [mgP/L] N [mgN/L] [mgN/L]
solids solids Nitrogen
[mgTSS/L] [mgVSS/L] [mgN/L]
Influent 491.34 436.37 972.00 75.00 8.60 36.00 0 7.90
Pre-Anoxic 8815.32 6618.94 9212.09 541.81 249.33 5.16 0.03 7.21
Aerobic 8812.70 6598.24 9177.40 537.88 249.33 0.80 3.56 7.18
Post- 8809.04 6593.96 9171.18 537.79 249.33 1.08 2.01 7.17
Anoxic
Membrane 9576.74 7168.35 9966.91 584.31 271.07 1.03 2.01 7.17

Tank
MBR 0.00 0.00 38.17 3.72 0.10 1.03 2.01 7.17
Effluent
Waste 9576.74 7168.35 9966.91 584.31 271.07 1.03 2.01 7.17
Sludge
Album page - Distributions
Volume Distribution
Pre-Anoxic 29 %
Membrane Tank 1%
Aerobic 49 %
Post-Anoxic 20 %
Album page - Distributions
Mass Distribution
Pre-Anoxic 29 %
Membrane Tank 1%
Aerobic 49 %
Post-Anoxic 20 %

Album page - Nutrient profiles
PO4-P Profile
SOL. PO4-P (mg/L)
25
20
15
Pre-Anoxic 6.10
10
MBR Effluent 0.10
5 Aerobic 0.36 Post-Anoxic 0.15 Membrane Tank 0.10
20
18 NH3-N
NO3-N
16
14
N CONCS (mg/L)
12
10
0
Pre-Anoxic Aerobic Post-Anoxic Membrane Tank MBR Effluent
NO3-N and NH3-N Profiles
Album page - MLSS profile
TSS Profile
12,000
9,577
10,000
8,815 8,813 8,809
8,000
CONC (mg/L)
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
Pre-Anoxic Aerobic Post-Anoxic Membrane Tank

Global Parameters
AOB
Name Default Value
Max. spec. growth rate [1/d] 0.90000 0.90000 1.0720
Substrate (NH4) half sat. [mgN/L] 0.70000 0.70000 1.0000
Aerobic decay rate [1/d] 0.17000 0.17000 1.0290
Anoxic/anaerobic decay rate [1/d] 0.08000 0.08000 1.0290
KiHNO2 [mmol/L] 0.00500 0.00500 1.0000
NOB
Name Default Value
Substrate (NO2) half sat. [mgN/L] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
KiNH3 [mmol/L] 0.07500 0.07500 1.0000
ANAMMOX
Name Default Value
Substrate (NH4) half sat. [mgN/L] 2.00000 2.00000 1.0000
Substrate (NO2) half sat. [mgN/L] 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Ki Nitrite [mgN/L] 1000.00000 1000.00000 1.0000
Nitrite sensitivity constant [L / (d mgN) ] 0.01600 0.01600 1.0000
OHOs
Name Default Value
Substrate half sat. [mgCOD/L] 5.00000 5.00000 1.0000
Anoxic growth factor [-] 0.50000 0.50000 1.0000
Aerobic decay [1/d] 0.62000 0.62000 1.0290
Anoxic/anaerobic decay [1/d] 0.30000 0.30000 1.0290
Hydrolysis rate (AS) [1/d] 2.10000 2.10000 1.0290
Hydrolysis half sat. (AS) [-] 0.06000 0.06000 1.0000
Anoxic hydrolysis factor [-] 0.28000 0.28000 1.0000
Anaerobic hydrolysis factor [-] 0.50000 0.50000 1.0000
Adsorption rate of colloids [L/(mgCOD d)] 0.80000 0.80000 1.0290
Ammonification rate [L/(mgN d)] 0.04000 0.04000 1.0290
Assimilative nitrate/nitrite reduction rate [1/d] 0.50000 0.50000 1.0000
Fermentation rate [1/d] 3.20000 3.20000 1.0290
Fermentation half sat. [mgCOD/L] 5.00000 5.00000 1.0000
Anaerobic growth factor (AS) [-] 0.12500 0.12500 1.0000
Hydrolysis rate (AD) [1/d] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0500
Hydrolysis half sat. (AD) [mgCOD/L] 0.15000 0.15000 1.0000
Methylotrophs
Name Default Value

Max. spec. growth rate of methanol utilizers [1/d] 1.30000 1.30000 1.0720
Methanol half sat. [mgCOD/L] 0.50000 0.50000 1.0000
Aerobic decay rate of methanol utilizers [1/d] 0.04000 0.04000 1.0290
Anoxic/anaerobic decay rate of methanol utilizers [1/d] 0.03000 0.03000 1.0290
PAOs
Name Default Value
Max. spec. growth rate, P-limited [1/d] 0.42000 0.42000 1.0000
Substrate half sat. [mgCOD(PHB)/mgCOD(Zbp)] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
Substrate half sat., P-limited [mgCOD(PHB)/mgCOD(Zbp)] 0.05000 0.05000 1.0000
Magnesium half sat. [mgMg/L] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
Cation half sat. [mmol/L] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
Calcium half sat. [mgCa/L] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
Anaerobic decay rate [1/d] 0.04000 0.04000 1.0000
Sequestration rate [1/d] 6.00000 6.00000 1.0000
Anoxic growth factor NO3 [-] 0.33000 0.33000 1.0000
Anoxic growth factor NO2 [-] 0.33000 0.33000 1.0000
Acetogens
Name Default Value
Substrate half sat. [mgCOD/L] 10.00000 10.00000 1.0000
Acetate inhibition [mgCOD/L] 10000.00000 10000.00000 1.0000
Decay rate [1/d] 0.05000 0.05000 1.0290
Methanogens
Name Default Value
Acetoclastic Mu Max [1/d] 0.30000 0.30000 1.0290
H2-utilizing Mu Max [1/d] 1.40000 1.40000 1.0290
Acetoclastic Ks [mgCOD/L] 100.00000 100.00000 1.0000
Acetoclastic methanol Ks [mgCOD/L] 0.50000 0.50000 1.0000
H2-utilizing CO2 half sat. [mmol/L] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
H2-utilizing Ks [mgCOD/L] 0.10000 0.10000 1.0000
H2-utilizing methanol Ks [mgCOD/L] 0.50000 0.50000 1.0000
Acetoclastic propionic inhibition [mgCOD/L] 10000.00000 10000.00000 1.0000
Acetoclastic decay rate [1/d] 0.13000 0.13000 1.0290
Acetoclastic aerobic decay rate [1/d] 0.60000 0.60000 1.0290
H2-utilizing decay rate [1/d] 0.13000 0.13000 1.0290
H2-utilizing aerobic decay rate [1/d] 0.60000 0.60000 1.0290
pH
Name Default Value
Heterotrophs low pH limit [-] 4.00000 4.00000
Heterotrophs high pH limit [-] 10.00000 10.00000
Methanol utilizers low pH limit [-] 4.00000 4.00000
Methanol utilizers high pH limit [-] 10.00000 10.00000
Autotrophs low pH limit [-] 5.50000 5.50000
Autotrophs high pH limit [-] 9.50000 9.50000
PolyP heterotrophs low pH limit [-] 4.00000 4.00000
Poly P heterotrophs high pH limit [-] 10.00000 10.00000
Heterotrophs low pH limit (anaerobic) [-] 5.50000 5.50000
Heterotrophs high pH limit (anaerobic) [-] 8.50000 8.50000

Propionic acetogens low pH limit [-] 4.00000 4.00000
Propionic acetogens high pH limit [-] 10.00000 10.00000
Acetoclastic methanogens low pH limit [-] 5.00000 5.00000
Acetoclastic methanogens high pH limit [-] 9.00000 9.00000
H2-utilizing methanogens low pH limit [-] 5.00000 5.00000
H2-utilizing methanogens high pH limit [-] 9.00000 9.00000
Switches
Name Default Value
Heterotrophic DO half sat. [mgO2/L] 0.05000 0.05000
Aerobic denit. DO half sat. [mgO2/L] 0.05000 0.05000
Ammonia oxidizer DO half sat. [mgO2/L] 0.25000 0.25000
Nitrite oxidizer DO half sat. [mgO2/L] 0.50000 0.50000
Anaerobic ammonia oxidizer DO half sat. [mgO2/L] 0.01000 0.01000
Anoxic NO3 half sat. [mgN/L] 0.10000 0.10000
Anoxic NO2 half sat. (mgN/L) 0.05000 0.05000
NH3 nutrient half sat. [mgN/L] 1.0000E-4 1.0000E-4
PolyP half sat. [mgP/L] 0.01000 0.01000
VFA sequestration half sat. [mgCOD/L] 5.00000 5.00000
P uptake half sat. [mgP/L] 0.15000 0.15000
P nutrient half sat. [mgP/L] 0.00100 0.00100
Autotroph CO2 half sat. [mmol/L] 0.10000 0.10000
Heterotrophic Hydrogen half sat. [mgCOD/L] 1.00000 1.00000
Propionic acetogens Hydrogen half sat. [mgCOD/L] 5.00000 5.00000
Synthesis anion/cation half sat. [meq/L] 0.01000 0.01000
AOB
Name Default Value
Yield [mgCOD/mgN] 0.15000 0.15000
N in biomass [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
N in inert [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
P in biomass [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
P in inert [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
Fraction to endogenous residue [-] 0.08000 0.08000
COD:VSS ratio [mgCOD/mgVSS] 1.42000 1.42000
NOB
Name Default Value
Yield [mgCOD/mgN] 0.09000 0.09000
ANAMMOX
Name Default Value
Yield [mgCOD/mgN] 0.11400 0.11400
Nitrate production [mgN/mgBiomassCOD] 2.28000 2.28000

OHOs
Name Default Value
Yield (aerobic) [-] 0.66600 0.66600
Yield (fermentation, low H2) [-] 0.10000 0.10000
Yield (fermentation, high H2) [-] 0.10000 0.10000
H2 yield (fermentation low H2) [-] 0.35000 0.35000
H2 yield (fermentation high H2) [-] 0 0
Propionate yield (fermentation, low H2) [-] 0 0
Propionate yield (fermentation, high H2) [-] 0.70000 0.70000
CO2 yield (fermentation, low H2) [-] 0.70000 0.70000
CO2 yield (fermentation, high H2) [-] 0 0
Endogenous Residue [-] 0.08000 0.08000
Yield (anoxic) [-] 0.54000 0.54000
Yield propionic (aerobic) [-] 0.50000 0.50000
Yield propionic (anoxic) [-] 0.41000 0.41000
Yield acetic (aerobic) [-] 0.40000 0.40000
Yield acetic (anoxic) [-] 0.32000 0.32000
Yield methanol (aerobic) [-] 0.50000 0.50000
Adsorp. max. [-] 1.00000 1.00000
Methylotrophs
Name Default Value
Yield (anoxic) [-] 0.40000 0.40000
Endogenous Residue [-] 0.08000 0.08000
PAOs
Name Default Value
Yield (aerobic) [-] 0.63900 0.63900
Yield (anoxic) [-] 0.52000 0.52000
Aerobic P/PHA uptake [mgP/mgCOD] 0.95000 0.95000
Anoxic P/PHA uptake [mgP/mgCOD] 0.35000 0.35000
Yield of PHA on sequestration [-] 0.88900 0.88900
N in part. inert [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
N in sol. inert [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
P in part. inert [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
Fraction to endogenous part. [-] 0.25000 0.25000
Inert fraction of endogenous sol. [-] 0.20000 0.20000
P/Ac release ratio [mgP/mgCOD] 0.49000 0.49000
Yield of low PP [-] 0.94000 0.94000
Acetogens

Name Default Value
Yield [-] 0.10000 0.10000
H2 yield [-] 0.40000 0.40000
CO2 yield [-] 1.00000 1.00000
N in endogenous residue [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
P in endogenous residue [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
Methanogens
Name Default Value
Acetoclastic yield [-] 0.10000 0.10000
Methanol acetoclastic yield [-] 0.10000 0.10000
H2-utilizing yield [-] 0.10000 0.10000
Methanol H2-utilizing yield [-] 0.10000 0.10000
N in acetoclastic biomass [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
N in H2-utilizing biomass [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
N in acetoclastic endog. residue [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
N in H2-utilizing endog. residue [mgN/mgCOD] 0.07000 0.07000
P in acetoclastic biomass [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
P in H2-utilizing biomass [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
P in acetoclastic endog. residue [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
P in H2-utilizing endog. residue [mgP/mgCOD] 0.02200 0.02200
Acetoclastic fraction to endog. residue [-] 0.08000 0.08000
H2-utilizing fraction to endog. residue [-] 0.08000 0.08000
Acetoclastic COD:VSS ratio [mgCOD/mgVSS] 1.42000 1.42000
H2-utilizing COD:VSS ratio [mgCOD/mgVSS] 1.42000 1.42000
General
Name Default Value
Particulate substrate COD:VSS ratio [mgCOD/mgVSS] 1.60000 1.32000
Particulate inert COD:VSS ratio [mgCOD/mgVSS] 1.60000 1.32000
Ash content of biomass (synthesis ISS) [%] 8.00000 8.00000
Molecular weight of other anions [mg/mmol] 35.50000 35.50000
Molecular weight of other cations [mg/mmol] 39.10000 39.10000
Mg to P mole ratio in polyphosphate [mmolMg/mmolP] 0.30000 0.30000
Cation to P mole ratio in polyphosphate [meq/mmolP] 0.30000 0.30000
Ca to P mole ratio in polyphosphate [mmolCa/mmolP] 0.05000 0.05000
Cation to P mole ratio in organic phosphate [meq/mmolP] 0.01000 0.01000
Bubble rise velocity (anaerobic digester) [cm/s] 23.90000 23.90000
Bubble Sauter mean diameter (anaerobic digester) [cm] 0.35000 0.35000
Anaerobic digester gas hold-up factor [] 1.00000 1.00000
Tank head loss per metre of length (from flow) [m/m] 0.00250 0.00250
Minimum air flow (per unit volume) without mixing [ m3/(m3 d) ] 1.00000 1.00000
Mass transfer
Name Default Value
Kl for H2 [m/d] 17.00000 17.00000 1.0240
Kl for CO2 [m/d] 10.00000 10.00000 1.0240
Kl for NH3 [m/d] 1.00000 1.00000 1.0240
Kl for CH4 [m/d] 8.00000 8.00000 1.0240
Kl for N2 [m/d] 15.00000 15.00000 1.0240
Kl for O2 [m/d] 13.00000 13.00000 1.0240

Physico-chemical rates
Name Default Value
Struvite precipitation rate [1/d] 3.0000E+10 3.0000E+10 1.0240
Struvite redissolution rate [1/d] 3.0000E+11 3.0000E+11 1.0240
Struvite half sat. [mgTSS/L] 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
HDP precipitation rate [L/(molP d)] 1.0000E+8 1.0000E+8 1.0000
HDP redissolution rate [L/(mol P d)] 1.0000E+8 1.0000E+8 1.0000
HAP precipitation rate [molHDP/(L d)] 5.0000E-4 5.0000E-4 1.0000
Physico-chemical constants
Name Default Value
Struvite solubility constant [mol/L] 6.9180E-14 6.9180E-14
HDP solubility product [mol/L] 2.7500E-22 2.7500E-22
HDP half sat. [mgTSS/L] 1.00000 1.00000
Equilibrium soluble PO4 with Al dosing at pH 7 [mgP/L] 0.01000 0.01000
Al to P ratio [molAl/molP] 0.80000 0.80000
Al(OH)3 solubility product [mol/L] 1.2590E+9 1.2590E+9
AlHPO4+ dissociation constant [mol/L] 7.9430E-13 7.9430E-13
Equilibrium soluble PO4 with Fe dosing at pH 7 [mgP/L] 0.01000 0.01000
Fe to P ratio [molFe/molP] 1.60000 1.60000
Fe(OH)3 solubility product [mol/L] 0.05000 0.05000
FeH2PO4++ dissociation constant [mol/L] 5.0120E-22 5.0120E-22
Aeration
Name Default Value
Alpha (surf) OR Alpha F (diff) [-] 0.50000 0.40000
Beta [-] 0.95000 0.95000
Surface pressure [kPa] 101.32500 101.32500
Fractional effective saturation depth (Fed) [-] 0.32500 0.32500
Supply gas CO2 content [vol. %] 0.03500 0.03500
Supply gas O2 [vol. %] 20.95000 20.95000
Off-gas CO2 [vol. %] 2.00000 2.00000
Off-gas O2 [vol. %] 18.80000 18.80000
Off-gas H2 [vol. %] 0 0
Off-gas NH3 [vol. %] 0 0
Off-gas CH4 [vol. %] 0 0
Surface turbulence factor [-] 2.00000 2.00000
Set point controller gain [] 1.00000 1.00000
Modified Vesilind
Name Default Value
Maximum Vesilind settling velocity (Vo) [ft/min] 0.3873 0.3873
Vesilind hindered zone settling parameter (K) [L/g] 0.3700 0.3700
Clarification switching function [mg/L] 100.0000 100.0000
Specified TSS conc.for height calc. [mg/L] 2500.0000 2500.0000
Maximum compactability constant [mg/L] 15000.0000 15000.0000
Double exponential
Name Default Value
Maximum Vesilind settling velocity (Vo) [ft/min] 0.9341 0.9341
Maximum (practical) settling velocity (Vo') [ft/min] 0.6152 0.6152
Hindered zone settling parameter (Kh) [L/g] 0.4000 0.4000
Flocculent zone settling parameter (Kf) [L/g] 2.5000 2.5000

Maximum non-settleable TSS [mg/L] 20.0000 20.0000
Non-settleable fraction [-] 0.0010 0.0010
Specified TSS conc. for height calc. [mg/L] 2500.0000 2500.0000
Biofilm general
Name Default Value
Attachment rate [ g / (m2 d) ] 80.00000 80.00000
Attachment TSS half sat. [mg/L] 100.00000 100.00000
Detachment rate [g/(m3 d)] 8.0000E+4 8.0000E+4
Solids movement factor [] 10.00000 10.00000
Diffusion neta [] 0.80000 0.80000
Thin film limit [mm] 0.50000 0.50000
Thick film limit [mm] 3.00000 3.00000
Assumed Film thickness for tank volume correction [mm] 0.75000 0.75000
Film surface area to media area ratio - Max.[ ] 1.00000 1.00000
Minimum biofilm conc. for streamer formation [gTSS/m2] 4.00000 4.00000
Maximum biofilm concentrations [mg/L]

Name Default Value
Non-polyP heterotrophs 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Anoxic methanol utilizers 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Ammonia oxidizing biomass 1.0000E+5 1.0000E+5 1.0000
Nitrite oxidizing biomass 1.0000E+5 1.0000E+5 1.0000
Anaerobic ammonia oxidizers 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
PolyP heterotrophs 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Propionic acetogens 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Acetoclastic methanogens 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Hydrogenotrophic methanogens 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Endogenous products 3.0000E+4 3.0000E+4 1.0000
Slowly bio. COD (part.) 5000.00000 5000.00000 1.0000
Slowly bio. COD (colloid.) 0 0 1.0000
Part. inert. COD 5000.00000 5000.00000 1.0000
Part. bio. org. N 0 0 1.0000
Part. bio. org. P 0 0 1.0000
Part. inert N 0 0 1.0000
Part. inert P 0 0 1.0000
Stored PHA 5000.00000 5000.00000 1.0000
Releasable stored polyP 1.1500E+6 1.1500E+6 1.0000
Fixed stored polyP 1.1500E+6 1.1500E+6 1.0000
PolyP bound cations 1.1500E+6 1.1500E+6 1.0000
Readily bio. COD (complex) 0 0 1.0000
Acetate 0 0 1.0000
Propionate 0 0 1.0000
Methanol 0 0 1.0000
Dissolved H2 0 0 1.0000
Dissolved methane 0 0 1.0000
Ammonia N 0 0 1.0000
Sol. bio. org. N 0 0 1.0000
Nitrite N 0 0 1.0000
Nitrate N 0 0 1.0000
Dissolved nitrogen gas 0 0 1.0000
PO4-P (Sol. & Me Complexed) 1.0000E+10 1.0000E+10 1.0000
Sol. inert COD 0 0 1.0000
Sol. inert TKN 0 0 1.0000
Inorganic S.S. 1.3000E+6 1.3000E+6 1.0000
Struvite 8.5000E+5 8.5000E+5 1.0000
Hydroxy-dicalcium-phosphate 1.1500E+6 1.1500E+6 1.0000
Hydroxy-apatite 1.6000E+6 1.6000E+6 1.0000
Magnesium 0 0 1.0000
Calcium 0 0 1.0000
Metal 1.0000E+10 1.0000E+10 1.0000
Other Cations (strong bases) 0 0 1.0000

Other Anions (strong acids) 0 0 1.0000
Total CO2 0 0 1.0000
User defined 1 0 0 1.0000
User defined 3 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
User defined 4 5.0000E+4 5.0000E+4 1.0000
Dissolved oxygen 0 0 1.0000
Effective diffusivities [m2/s]

Name Default Value
Non-polyP heterotrophs 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Anoxic methanol utilizers 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Ammonia oxidizing biomass 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Nitrite oxidizing biomass 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Anaerobic ammonia oxidizers 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
PolyP heterotrophs 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Propionic acetogens 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Acetoclastic methanogens 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Hydrogenotrophic methanogens 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Endogenous products 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Slowly bio. COD (part.) 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Slowly bio. COD (colloid.) 6.9000E-11 6.9000E-11 1.0290
Part. inert. COD 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Part. bio. org. N 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Part. bio. org. P 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Part. inert N 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Part. inert P 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Stored PHA 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Releasable stored polyP 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Fixed stored polyP 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
PolyP bound cations 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Readily bio. COD (complex) 6.9000E-10 6.9000E-10 1.0290
Acetate 1.2400E-9 1.2400E-9 1.0290
Propionate 8.3000E-10 8.3000E-10 1.0290
Methanol 1.6000E-9 1.6000E-9 1.0290
Dissolved H2 5.8500E-9 5.8500E-9 1.0290
Dissolved methane 1.9625E-9 1.9625E-9 1.0290
Ammonia N 2.0000E-9 2.0000E-9 1.0290
Sol. bio. org. N 1.3700E-9 1.3700E-9 1.0290
Nitrite N 2.9800E-9 2.9800E-9 1.0290
Nitrate N 2.9800E-9 2.9800E-9 1.0290
Dissolved nitrogen gas 1.9000E-9 1.9000E-9 1.0290
PO4-P (Sol. & Me Complexed) 2.0000E-9 2.0000E-9 1.0290
Sol. inert COD 6.9000E-10 6.9000E-10 1.0290
Sol. inert TKN 6.8500E-10 6.8500E-10 1.0290
Inorganic S.S. 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Struvite 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Hydroxy-dicalcium-phosphate 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Hydroxy-apatite 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Magnesium 7.2000E-10 7.2000E-10 1.0290
Calcium 7.2000E-10 7.2000E-10 1.0290
Metal 4.8000E-10 4.8000E-10 1.0290
Other Cations (strong bases) 1.4400E-9 1.4400E-9 1.0290
Other Anions (strong acids) 1.4400E-9 1.4400E-9 1.0290
Total CO2 1.9600E-9 1.9600E-9 1.0290
User defined 1 6.9000E-10 6.9000E-10 1.0290
User defined 2 6.9000E-10 6.9000E-10 1.0290
User defined 3 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
User defined 4 5.0000E-14 5.0000E-14 1.0290
Dissolved oxygen 2.5000E-9 2.5000E-9 1.0290
EPS Strength coefficients [ ]

Name Default Value
Non-polyP heterotrophs 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Anoxic methanol utilizers 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Ammonia oxidizing biomass 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Nitrite oxidizing biomass 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Anaerobic ammonia oxidizers 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
PolyP heterotrophs 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Propionic acetogens 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Acetoclastic methanogens 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Hydrogenotrophic methanogens 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Endogenous products 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Slowly bio. COD (part.) 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Slowly bio. COD (colloid.) 0 0 1.0000
Part. inert. COD 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Part. bio. org. N 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Part. bio. org. P 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Part. inert N 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Part. inert P 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Stored PHA 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Releasable stored polyP 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Fixed stored polyP 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
PolyP bound cations 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Readily bio. COD (complex) 0 0 1.0000
Acetate 0 0 1.0000
Propionate 0 0 1.0000
Methanol 0 0 1.0000
Dissolved H2 0 0 1.0000
Dissolved methane 0 0 1.0000
Ammonia N 0 0 1.0000
Sol. bio. org. N 0 0 1.0000
Nitrite N 0 0 1.0000
Nitrate N 0 0 1.0000
Dissolved nitrogen gas 0 0 1.0000
PO4-P (Sol. & Me Complexed) 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Sol. inert COD 0 0 1.0000
Sol. inert TKN 0 0 1.0000
Inorganic S.S. 0.33000 0.33000 1.0000
Struvite 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Hydroxy-dicalcium-phosphate 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Hydroxy-apatite 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Magnesium 0 0 1.0000
Calcium 0 0 1.0000
Metal 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Other Cations (strong bases) 0 0 1.0000
Other Anions (strong acids) 0 0 1.0000
Total CO2 0 0 1.0000
User defined 3 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
User defined 4 1.00000 1.00000 1.0000
Dissolved oxygen 0 0 1.0000

APPENDIX E
Information and Specifications/Warranty for Norit/Dynatec Membrane

System
AirliftTM MBR
Municipal Waste Water

Challenge
Municipal waste water needs to be treated as it originates exactly
there where people live. The treatment should be done as close as
possible to the source. With growing cities the footprint of these
plants and the quality of effluent needed have given more and more
interest in compact waste water treatment plants.
In a growing number of plants submerged membranes are applied to

improve them to Membrane Bioreactors (MBR). However cleanability
and maintenance are not ideal in these plants, as the membranes are
difficult to reach. Uniform distribution of membranes and the ability
to reach every square meter of the membrane area are essential for
optimal operation and keeping a plant running satisfactory.
Solution
The X-Flow’s AirLiftTM configuration offers a membrane solution out-
side the reactor allowing the maintenance of the plant to be simple
and clean. Due to the inside out configuration of membrane filtration
all membrane area is subject to the same process conditions.
Energy consumption is at the same level of submerged membranes
or even less, due to the efficient usage of process conditions for
flux enhancement.
X-Flow’s tubular 5 mm UF membrane will allow a bioreactor to

run up to 15 g/l MLSS biomass.
X-Flow’s 5 mm tubes found their way in MBR applications in the
municipal and industrial market in areas such as:
• Municipal WWTP
• Food industry
The X-Flow tubular membrane modules are being produced with

ISO 9000 certification.
AirliftTM MBR
Features and benefits

Tight UF membrane Turbidity < 0.1 NTU
Silt Density Index < 3
AirLift filtration Very low energy consumption
Simple lay out
High flux rates
Low trans membrane pressure
Cleaning In Place Fully automated cleanings
Use of low cost chemicals
Fully automatic operation Logging of operating parameters
Atmospheric system Fully enclosed
No operator exposure to fumes or aerosols
Small footprint
Examples
X-Flow has provided membranes for MBRs for a growing number of plants world
wide. Capacity ranges from less than 10 m3/hr (44 gpm) to more than 150 m3/hr
(440 gpm).
WWTP Grand Traverse - USA

Capacity 100.000 gpd
Year of start up 2004
Technology X-Flow AirLiftTM MBR
WWTP Ootmarsum - Holland

Capacity 150 m3/h
Year of start up 2006/2007
Cigarette factory Xuzhou - China

Capacity 2000 m3/day
Technology X-Flow AirLiftTM
WWTP Millsborough - USA

Capacity 175 m3/h (1,1 MGD)
X-Flow BV
P.O. Box 739 • 7500 AS Enschede • The Netherlands
T +31 (0)53 42 87 350 • F +31 (0)53 42 87 351
E info@xflow.nl www.x-flow.com X-Flow BV reserves the right to make changes in the technical specifications at any time.
References membrane bioreactors
X-FLOW Membranes
MBR membranes and their application
REF-MBR-0806daytot
OVER 75.000 M3/DAY MBR CAPACITY

Capacity Year Customer/OEM Location Membrane and Module Application
[m3/day]
17000 2007/8 Veolia Palm Jumeira 38PRV F4385 Municipal

4200 2006/7 Parkson Millsborough, US 38PRV F4385 Municipal
4000 2007 UEM Valyampet 38PRV F4385 Industrial
3600 2005/6 NMT Ootmarsum 38PRV F4385 Municipal
3600 2003 ATM NL 38GRV, F5385 Cleaning waste water
3000 + 2000 2006 DMT/NORIT Istanbul 38GRH F5385 Leachate (2 units)
2400 2007 NMT Obolon 38GRH F5385 Brewery MBR
2400 2008 NMT Venezuela 38PRV F4385 Brewery AL MBR
2400 2007 UEM Thuthipet 38PRV F4385 Industrial
2160 2006 Dynatec Singapore 38GRH F5385 Thermophilic MBR
2040 2000 Wehrle Werk AG Dairy Gold, Irel. 38GRH, F5385 Dairy waste water
2000 2007 Tsinghua Xuzhou China 38PRV, F4385 Cigarette factory
2000 2004 Septo/NMT Bavaria 38GRH, F5385 Maltery water
~2000 2006/7 Dynatec US 38PRV F4385 Chicken factory / municipal
1680 2006 Fumatech Sachsenmilch 38GRH F5385 Dairy waste water; recycle
(RO)
1750 2008 Ternois Riec sur Belon 38PRV F4385 Municipal
1560 2003 Wehrle Werk AG Kellogs, UK 38GRH, F5385 Food waste water
1560 2005 Dynatec/Aquabio Food appl. USA 38GRH, F5385 Food waste water
1440 2006 Aquabio / NMT Glasgow, UK 38GRH F5385 Waste water carbon factory
Page 1 of 6
X-FLOW Membranes
REF-MBR-0806daytot

[m3/day]
1320 2006 White Martins Brasil 38GRH F5385 Textile factory

1200 2005 Cruise ship Germany Marine style, F5385 Municipal
1200 2004 Aquabio Geest Bourn S. 38GRH, F5385 Food waste water (veg.)
1080 2003 Aquabio Eden Vale 38GRH, F5385 Dairy waste water
1000 1999 SEAB Munkedal, S *) 38PRH, F4385 Paper mill
960 2001 Cruise ship Italy Marine style, F5385 Municipal
960 2001 Cruise ship UK Marine style, F5385 Municipal
900 2007 NMT/Strix E Europe 38GRH, F5385 Industrial
900 2007 Baradero Argentina 38GRH, F5385 textile
840 2000 WNWB Cargill, NL 38GRH, B5125 Food processing waste w.
800 2007 UEM Malligaithope 38PRV F4385 Industrial
720 2007 NMT Belgium 38 GRH F5385 Brewery MBR
720 1993 Otto AWG, D 33PE, B4125 Leachate
Page 2 of 6
X-FLOW Membranes
REF-MBR-0806daytot

[m3/day]
600 2007 Pilar Argentina 38GRH, F5385 textile

600 2006 Aquatech Pakistan 38GRH F5385 Textile wastewater
500 2006 Parkson Port of the Island 38PRV F4385 Municipal
500 2003 ATM NL 38GRV, F5385 Industrial
480 2002 Grontmij Hooge Maey, B 38GRH, F5385 Leachate
490 2006 Dayen Munic. Oman 38GRH F5385 Municipal waste water crflow.
480 1994 Otto ART, D 7P, S0220 Leachate
480 2003 Aquabio Golden West, UK 38GRH, F5385 Dairy waste water
480 2005 MFT China 38GRH F5385 Leachate
420 2002 Dynatec Engine factory 38GRH F5385 Factory waste water
400 2005 Dynatec Grand Traverse 38PRV F4385 Municipal
400 2008 Zhong China Gaoantun 2 38GRH F5385 Leachate
400 2008 Yihuan Huashan 38GRH F5385 Leachate
360 2001 Dynatec Michigan, USA 38GRH, F5385 Car factory waste
360 2001 Triqua Weert, NL 38GRH, F5385 Tankcleaning
360 2002 Aquabio Kanes Food UK 38GRH, F5385 Foodprocessing
360 2004 Aquabio Ledbury Preserves 38GRH, F5385 Foodprocessing
Page 3 of 6
X-FLOW Membranes
REF-MBR-0806daytot

[m3/day]
360 2001 Wehrle Werk AG Lanarkshire, Scotl. 38PRH, F5385 Dairy waste water
360 2001 Wehrle Werk AG Lanarkshire, Scotl. 38PRH, F5385 Dairy waste water
350 1997 Wehrle Werk AG Lorrach, D 7P, A0220 Leachate
250 2004 Wehrle Werk AG China Gaoantun 38GRH F5385 Leachate
250 2004 Wehrle Werk AG China, Beishanshu 38GRH, F5385 Leachate
250 2003 Wehrle Werk AG China, Zhongshan 38GRH, F5385 Leachate
250 2004 ATM NL 38PRV F4385 Industrial
250 2003 RMT Leeuwarden 38PRV, F4385 Municipal
250 2004 Dynatec Glen Meadows 38PRV, F4385 Municipal
250 2002 Dynatec Bahama’s 38GRH F5385 Wastewater
225 2000 Triqua Apeldoorn, NL 33GE, F5385 Paper mill
200 2004 Proserpol France 38GRH, F5385 Wastewater candy
200 2002 Septo Zaandam, NL 38GRH, F5385 Tank cleaning
200 2002 Septo Maastricht, NL 38GRH, F5385 Tank cleaning
200 2000 Ecotechnica Italy 38PRH, A4125 Chemical plant
200 1998 Wehrle Werk AG Piesberg, D 7P, A0220 Leachate
200 2001 White Martins Manaus, (Brasil) 38PRH, F4385 Municipal wastewater
Page 4 of 6
X-FLOW Membranes
REF-MBR-0806daytot

[m3/day]
180 1998 Grontmij VBM, NL 38PRH, A4125 Leachate chemical site

180 2003 K-Pack Rotterdam, NL 38GRH, F5385 Tankcleaning
175 2006 PWT India pilot 38GRH F5385 Tannery effluent
175 2001 DHV Pernis, NL 38PRV, F4385 Tankcleaning
175 2005 BekkerLagram Waalwijk NL 38GRH F5385 Roadcleaning, mobile
175 2006 BekkerLagram Waalwijk NL 38GRH F5385 Roadcleaning, mobile
175 2003 Seghers Cova, Portugal 38GRH, F5385 Leachate
175 1996 Wehrle Werk AG CAW, NL 7P, A0220 Leachate
175 2000 Ecotechnica Milan, Italy 38PRH, F5172 Waste water
175 2001 ATM NL 38GRV, F4385 Cleaning waste water
175 2001 MG Italy 38PRV, F4385 Waste water
175 1999 VA Tech Wabag Vienna, Austria 38PRV, F4385 Municipal waste water
175 2003 Yanmar Japan 38GRH, F4385 Municipal waste water
175 2002 G&C Eng. S.Korea 33PEF4385 Wastewater
175 2002 Enercon Italy 38PRH, F5172 Food waste water
150 1997 Wedeco Biberach, D 38PE, F4385 Leachate
125 2003 Dynatec Saddle Ridge, US 38PRV F4385 Municipal
120 2000 Wehrle Freiburg, Germany 38PRV F4385 leachate
120 1999 VA Tech Vienna, Austria 38PRV F4385 Municipal
100 2002 Marine UK Marine style, F5385 Municipal
Page 5 of 6
X-FLOW Membranes
REF-MBR-0806daytot

[m3/day]

Page 6 of 6
X-Flow B.V.
P.O. Box 739 – 7500 AS ENSCHEDE – The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)53 4287350 Fax: +31 (0)53 4287351
E-mail: info@xflow.com
Internet: www.x-flow.com
Appendix A2 Compact, Pro-rated Lifetime Warranty Conditions
1. Membrane Element warranty membrane failure due to X-Flow’s fault in manufacturing; all other
causes are excluded. If there is any dispute with respect to the
There is no other warranty express or implied as provided for herein. above, the Purchaser should provide evidence to X-Flow.
X-Flow warrants that its membrane elements supplied shall be free from b) The Purchaser and/or Owner of the membrane elements will
defects in materials and workmanship. immediately notify X-Flow in writing of any potential issues or claims
relating to the membrane element warranties.
The membrane element warranty for lifetime will commence upon
installation of the membrane elements in the UF system or three months c) The feed and/or backwash stream to the element(s) shall contain
after the date of membrane element ready for shipment ex works neither organic nor inorganic matter or solutions harmful to the
Enschede, The Netherlands, whichever comes first. membrane elements as listed on the X-Flow Product Datasheets
and/or X-Flow Chemical Resistance Datasheet (see appendix B). Also
X-Flow’s sole liability and the Purchaser and/or Owner exclusive remedy
fiber damage due to foreign debris is excluded from this warranty.
under this warranty shall be to provide replacement membrane elements
and is limited to the initial membrane element contract value. d) Membrane elements shall be handled and stored according the
instructions on the X-Flow data and instruction sheets.
Any membrane element found to be defective under the terms of this
e) During normal operation the membrane element(s) shall be
warranty during the first 12 months of the warranty period will be replaced
protected against the introduction or intrusion of any and all gasses
at no cost to the Purchaser and/or Owner, excluding shipping and handling
(i.e.: air) unless the entering of gas is required and/or allowed during
charges
certain controlled process steps / sequences, such as but not limited
to air-flush, airlift or integrity tests.
Any membrane element found to be defective under the terms of this
warranty after the initial 12 months of the warranty period will be replaced f) The membrane element shall be operationally protected against
based on the pro-rata membrane element value as calculated below, hydraulic and pneumatic shock loading such as, but not limited to
excluding shipping and handling charges. water hammer, etc.
g) X-Flow understands that the membrane elements will be used as a
Pro-rata membrane element value:
part of a larger water treatment process. X-Flow must be given the
opportunity, with a reasonable notice, to review engineering
Membrane element Replacement Price* X Months Beneficial Use
documents and attend testing and commissioning activities of all
Total membrane element Warranty Period (months)
aspects of the water treatment process which may affect membrane
lifetime.
The Membrane Replacement Price is based on the actual list price at the
time of replacement or otherwise agreed upon.
Note: That neither a review of the engineering documents nor
The months of beneficial use will be calculated based on the calendar
attendance of testing or commissioning nor the declining of the
month of the warranty claim relative to the commencement of the
opportunity does constitute any responsibility for any aspect of the
warranty period.
system.
The membrane element warranty period is 36 months or otherwise agreed
h) The purchaser and/or Owner will calculate and record the
upon.
temperature-normalized clean membrane permeability after each
membrane element cleaning for the duration of the membrane
element warranty period and any subsequent extensions. The
2. Membrane Element Failure Criteria
Purchaser and/or Owner will immediately notify X-Flow in writing of
any recorded drop in temperature-normalized clean membrane
A membrane element shall be considered defective if it meets one or more
permeability of greater than 10% of reference permeability value.
of the following criteria:
The notification shall include all pertinent treatment process and
operating parameters at the time of the reading. Purchaser and/or
An individual membrane element shall be considered defective;
Owner should avoid scaling or fouling of membranes at all times.
• if more than 5 of the total number of membrane tubes in the
element have required repair (i.e.: by plugging, pinning and/or
i) The Purchaser and/or Owner of the membrane elements will
gluing) during any consecutive period of 12 months
maintain for the duration of the warrantees complete and accurate
• if more than 10 of the total number of membrane tubes in the
daily records of all relevant process settings and data (see Appendix
element have required repair (i.e.: by plugging, pinning and/or
C, “Trending and Logging”). Copies of these data shall be made
gluing) over the total course of the warranty period.
available to X-Flow upon request.
Note:
j) Any defects or faults caused by any alterations to the membrane
Tubes repaired during production and testing are excluded from the failure
elements, or improper use or mishandling of consumable items used
count.
in the operation of the membrane elements, by the Purchaser and/or
Tube repair on site is the responsibility of the purchaser and or owner.
Owner or his authorized representative are specifically excluded from
this warranty. Furthermore any replacement of X-Flow membranes by
membranes not produced and/or supplied by X-Flow will render this
3. General Warranty Conditions
warranty null and void.
All warrantees shall be null and void if any of the following conditions are
k) In the case where the Purchaser and Owner are separate parties,
not met:
the Purchaser has sole and exclusive responsibility for making the
Owner aware of his responsibilities under the conditions of this
a) Accidental and/or external caused damages and damages caused by
warranty. Failure of the Purchaser and/or Owner to meet their
improper use are excluded from this warranty. Accidental and/or external
respective obligations under this agreement will render this warranty
caused damages and damages caused by improper use are damages
null and void.
caused by but not limited to operation and/or exposure of membranes
modules to conditions, outside the instructions and conditions listed in the
X-Flow Product Datasheets or misuse, abuse or improper installation,
operation, maintenance, or repair, alteration, accidents. Also, damages
caused by uncontrolled and/or defective operation of the overall water
treatment process in which the membrane elements are used or parts
thereof are excluded from this warranty. This warranty is strictly limited to
Page 1 of 2 2008 rev7

X-Flow B.V.
P.O. Box 739 – 7500 AS ENSCHEDE – The Netherlands
Tel: +31 (0)53 4287350 Fax: +31 (0)53 4287351
E-mail: info@xflow.com
Internet: www.x-flow.com
Appendix A2 Compact, Pro-rated Lifetime Warranty Conditions
4. Conditions for Testing and Shipment d) If after the testing the failure of the membrane element is
determined to be caused by the Purchaser, the Purchaser shall pay X-
a) X-Flow reserves the right to test and verify the failure of any membrane Flow all damages and expenses such as but not limited to: costs for
element for which a warranty claim is made. testing, reports, site visits, etc..
b) Membrane elements shipped to X-Flow for warranty examination must e) Membrane elements examined as part of a warranty claim, which
be shipped freight, tax and custom duties prepaid. are found to be performing as warranted will be returned to the
Purchaser freight collect and a handling charge will be levied against
the Purchaser.
c) Before returning any membrane element(s) to X-Flow for warranty ALL MEMBRANE ELEMENT WARRANTEES ARE SUBJECT TO THE
examination, X-Flow must be contacted to obtain return authorization. For WARRANTY CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN THIS DOCUMENT UNLESS
that purpose, follow X-Flow’s return procedure which can be found on our AGREED OTHERWISE.
website (www.x-flow.com). Any element(s) shipped to X-Flow without LIABILITY FOR DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, INCIDENTAL,
return documentation will be returned to shipper unopened, freight collect. SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE EXCLUDED
Page 2 of 2 2008 rev7

(C) Norit Printed 7/29/2009 @ 5:08 PM
V 2.5
Projection AirLift UF installation

Customer City of Anaheom, CA Comments:
Projectname AL-MBR Demo 40 lmh is conservative. Higher flux rates can be tested as needed for peak design considerations.
Pr.Number X09-0027/SF#09-01-1932 Pump and blower capacities will be the only issue since supply and discharge capacities are essentially unlimited
Revision 1 due to direct draw and discharge to the sewer.
Subject 100 kgpd Rev 1: 50 Kgpd to start, expandable to 100 Kgpd.
Date 7/29/2009
Designed by TBroad
Checked by
Design requirements (based on biological treatment inlet conditions):

Nominal flow gpm 70.0 15.9 m3/h Assistance regarding peak (and nominal) flow duration
Peak flow not applicable gpm 80.0 18.2 m3/h
Average flow equals Nominal flow 2 Advise 2 What is the duration of the peak flow? 2 hours 24
22 Advise 22 How often does the peak flow occur per day? 1 time(s) a day
Required daily throughput: m3/d 382
Required average net capacity m3/h 15.9
UF skid mass balance based on 14 modules installed, without safety margins!
Buffer capacity:
Buffer required to continously run at average capacitym3 Not aplicable PER SECTION
0 Dosing set 1: 115 l/h
No buffercapacity is available within treatment Dosing set 2: 1117 l/h
Design requirements (based on biological treatment outlet conditions, including buffer capacity)
Maximum capacity required: m3/h 15.9
Maximum capacity with current design m3/h 16.0 Overdesign: 0.8% Backwash flow: 138.6 m3/h
Nominal capacity required: m3/h 15.9
UF configuration Bio reactor Maximum gross perm flow: 19 m3/h

Skid type - 20 Maximum nett perm flow: 16 m3/h
Number of sections - 1
Number skids per section (max = 14) - 1
Number of installed UF modules per skid - 14 Airlift: 140 nm3/h
Membrane area per module m2 33
Spare modules per skid - 6 30% spare positions Sludge recirculation: 319.2 m3/h
Total number of skids - 1
Total number of modules - 14 Drain volume 2.4 m3
Membrane area per skid m2 462
Membrane area total installation m2 462 UF SKID lay-out based on 14 modules installed!!, total number skids = 1
UF design settings Resulting plant operation

Design constraint flux lmh 50
Design constraint filtration time min 10 Calculated daily throughput:
Maximum gross flux lmh 42.0 Nominal operation @ 16.0 m3/h during 24.0 h/d (34.7 lmh net flux)
Filtration time min 9 Maximum operation @ 16.0 m3/h during 2.0 h/d (34.692 lmh net flux)
Drain Sequence frequency per skid hr/DS 4 Daily thoughput 384 m3/d
CEB frequency per skid days/CEB 31
Recovery during maximum flux - 83.4%
Total maximal net permeate production m3/h 16 This document is provided for information only. Membrane or system performance warrantees are neither expressed nor implied by this design.
X09-0027_XBV_AnaheimCA_Demo_AL-MBR_100Kgpd rev1.xls Fill in sheet Page 1 of 1

APPENDIX F
Information, Specifications and Calculations for Ozonation System
MWH
Client: City of Anaheim
B C D E F
2 TITLE: Ozone Disinfection System Design
3
4 OBJECTIVE To provide calculations for the Ozone Disinfection System and related facilites
5
6 denotes entered value
7
8 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS & INFORMATION
9 1 Applied Process Technologies's (APT) HiPOx® will be utilized for this application
10 2 System will be designed for 0.1 mgd maximum flow (70 mgd)
11 3 Reactor mode will be for disinfection (ozone feed only; hydrogen peroxide feed may be added later for advanced oxidation - emerging contaminants removal)
12 4 Reactor has CADPH conditional approval for Title 22 Disinfection using CT= 1.0 mg*min/L
13 5 Lower CT may be required, but calculations will assume 1.0 to be conservative. High quality from MBR effluent may require lower CT for disinfection
14 6 Ozone system to operate 24/7
15
16
17
18
19 DESCRIPTION UNIT CALCULATIONS COMMENT
20
21 OZONATION EQUIPMENT
22 Ozone Requirements
23 Design Flow - max mgd 0.13
24 gpm 90
25 Ozone demand mg/L 4.0 Expected from MBR effluent (6 to 8 mg/L for raw wastewater)
26 Ozone residual mg/L 0.5 Sufficient for detection
27 Total Ozone Dose - Dissolved mg/L 4.5
28 Transfer efficiency % 90 Estimated for tubular reactors with multiple injection points
29 Total Ozone Dose - Transferred mg/L 5.0
30 Total Ozone Requirements - daily ppd 5.4
31 Contingency % 30.0
32 Total Ozone Requirements - daily (loaded) ppd 8.0
33
34 Ozone Generators
35 Operating unit 1
36 Stand-by unit 1
37 Total Number of Generators unit 2
38
39 Equipment factor % 100.0
40 Ozone Concentration in oxygen feed % 8
41 Capacity, each unit ppd 8
42
43 Oxygen/Air Requirements
3
44 GOX density kg/m 1.331 1 atm and 68 deg F
45 pcf 0.0831 1 atm and 68 deg F
46 GOX demand ppd 100
47 GOX flow, total scfm 0.8
48 GOX % in air % 21
49 Air flow, total scfm 4.0
50
51 Liquid Oxygen Requirements (optional)
52 GOX demand ppd 100
53 GOX flow, total scfd 1,203
3
54 LOX density kg/m 1,140 at boiling point
55 pcf 71.2 at boiling point
56 VGOX/VLOX ratio ratio 856.50
57 Equivalent LOX volume cfd 1.40
58 LOX mass ppd 100.0 ok - must match GOX mass (E45)
59
60 LOX volume in dewar vessel L 240 Based on standard LOX dewar 53" height, 26" diameter
61 cf 8.5
62 Dewars on site unit 2
63 Total LOX capacity onsite cf 17
64 Days of storage days 12.1
65
66
67 Power Requirements
68 Ozone generator + Pumps + Instruments Kwh 15.0 Provided by APT
69 Energy cost $/Kwh 0.10
70 Annual Energy Cost $/year $ 13,140.00
71
Page 1
N
IG
ES
D
Y
AR
IN
IM
EL
PR
N
IG
ES
D
Y
AR
IN
IM
EL
PR
APPENDIX G
Information and Specifications for UV System
WASTEWATER DISINFECTION
FILTERED IN-PIPE TREATMENT
Proven Trojan products. A new application.
Validated, chemical-free disinfection from the industry leader
Around the globe, wastewater treatment filtered effluent sometimes prefer a TrojanUVFit™ closed-vessel solution an
plants of all sizes are responding to the disinfection solution using closed-vessel attractive option for wastewater disinfection.
water quality and quantity demands of or pressurized UV reactors. The TrojanUVFit™
the communities they serve. As more offers an effective and energy-efficient Trojan Technologies is an ISO 9001:2000
municipalities adopt wastewater reuse closed-vessel UV solution. This compact registered company that has been leading
policies and practices, wastewater reactor is available in multiple configurations the UV disinfection market with open-
treatment plants are required to treat to treat a wide range of flow rates. The channel solutions for wastewater
effluent to higher levels –essentially streamlined hydraulic profile of closed- disinfection (e.g. TrojanUV3000Plus™)
eliminating all pathogens prior to reuse vessel systems disinfect filtered effluent in over 5,000 municipal installations
or discharge. without breaking head in the treatment worldwide – the largest UV installation
process. These benefits along with UV’s base. The TrojanUVFit™, the latest addition
Depending on site and design conditions, ability to provide environmentally-friendly, to the Trojan product line, rounds out a
wastewater treatment plants producing chemical-free treatment for chlorine complete portfolio of products for
resistant microorganisms (such as wastewater disinfection and reuse
Cryptosporidium and Giardia) make the applications.
Key Benefits
TrojanUVFit™
Fully Validated Performance. System sizing is based on actual dose delivery

verified through bioassay validation. Real-world, field performance data eliminates sizing
assumptions and risks associated with theoretical dose calculations.
Compact Design. The small reactor footprint simplifies indoor retrofit installations and
reduces construction costs.
Reliable, Proven Components. UV lamps, quartz sleeves, electronic ballasts, sensors

and sleeve wiping system have been tested, proven reliable and are operating
in hundreds of installations.
Design Flexibility. Reactors can be installed in parallel or in series, making it simple to

incorporate redundancy or future expansion needs.
Wide Range of Flow Rates. Peak flow rates per reactor are suitable for either
individual post-filter or manifold installation. Flows up to 7 MGD per reactor – the largest
validated low-pressure lamp in-pipe wastewater system in the industry.
Validated Lamp Performance. Lamp output and aging characteristics validated

through industry protocols and proven through years of operating experience.
Automatic Wiping. Automatic sleeve wiping saves operator’s time and money. Ensures
the maximum UV output is available for disinfection and minimizes energy consumption.
Global support. Local service. Trojan’s comprehensive network of certified service

providers offers fast response for service and spare parts.
Guaranteed Performance and Comprehensive Warranty. Trojan systems

include a Lifetime Disinfection Performance Guarantee. Ask for details.
Designed for efficient, reliable performance
System Control Center
The microprocessor or PLC-based
controller continuously monitors and
controls UV system functions.
SCADA communication via ModBus
for remote monitoring, control and
dose pacing is available. Programmable
digital and analog I/O capabilities can
Sleeve Wiping System generate unique alarms for individual
applications and send signals to operate
Automatic sleeve wiping system operates valves and pumps.
on-line without interrupting disinfection.
The wiping sequence occurs automatically
at preset intervals without operator
involvement.
Amalgam Lamps
High-output amalgam lamps are energy-efficient and
save operating costs due to reduced electrical consumption.
Lamps are located within protective quartz sleeves with
easy access from the service entrance.
UV Intensity Sensor
Highly accurate, photodiode sensor
monitors UV output within the
reactor. The sensor ensures UV light
is fully penetrating the water for
complete disinfection.
Compact reactors designed for high flow rates also available. This reactor contains lamps in both
ends of the reactor. Multiple inlet and outlet flange orientations are available.
Power Distribution Center (PDC)
The PDC panel distributes power to the reactor, UV
intensity sensor and sleeve wiping system. The panel also
houses high-efficiency, variable-output (60 –100% power)
or constant-output ballasts with proven performance in
hundreds of installations around the world.
End Cap
The end cap protects and isolates connections
for components such as lamps, sleeves and
wiping system. Power is automatically disconnected
if end cap is removed thereby ensuring a safe
working environment for operators.
UV Reactor
Electropolished 316L stainless steel chamber
available in multiple configurations for a wide
range of flow rates. Optional flange orientations
allow reactors to fit into existing piping
galleries or tight spaces.
Regulatory-Endorsed Bioassay Validation
Field testing ensures accurate dose delivery
Benefits:
• Validated in accordance with industry protocols established by National Water Research Institute (NWRI)
• Performance data is generated from actual field testing over a wide range of flow rates and water quality
(UV transmission)
• Bioassay testing offers peace of mind and improved public and environmental safety due to verified dose
delivery – not theoretical calculations
Compact Reactor for Installation Flexibility

Efficient, cost-saving design enables retrofit or new construction
Benefits:
• Compact footprint simplifies
installation and minimizes related
capital costs – ideal for retrofit
and new construction applications
• Lamps and sleeves are fully
serviceable from the reactor end –
allowing the system to be installed
against walls, other equipment
or piping
• Low headloss design simplifies
integration into existing process,
and avoids additional pumping
and associated capital and
operational costs
• Multiple flange orientations available
– increasing design flexibility Reactors can be installed in parallel or in series for increased design and installation flexibility.
Amalgam Lamps Require Less Energy

Maintain maximum output and reduce O&M costs
Benefits:
• Each lamp draws 250 Watts
• Trojan’s amalgam lamps maintain 98% output during entire lamp life – 20% less decline than
competitive UV lamps
• Validated performance provides assurance of reliable dose delivery and prolonged lamp life
• Deliver consistent and stable UV output over a wide range of water temperatures
Built for Reliable Performance and Easy Maintenance
Designed for trouble-free operation and minimal service
Benefits:
• Routine procedures, including
lamp changeouts are simple and
require minimal time – reducing
maintenance costs
• Access to internal components
(lamps, sleeves, cleaning system)
through service entrance at
one end.
• Service entrance and
connections isolated and
protected by end cap
• Intensity sensor continuously
monitors UV output to ensure
dose delivery
The TrojanUVFit™ lamps are easily replaced in minutes without the need for tools.
Robust Sleeve Wiping System

Automatic wiping system maintains consistent dose delivery
Benefits:
• Wiping system minimizes fouling of quartz sleeves
• Ensures consistent UV dose delivery and optimum performance
• Automatic wiping occurs while the lamps are disinfecting, reducing downtime
• Optional off-line chemical cleaning to reduce maintenance associated
with manual cleaning
User-Friendly Operator Interface

Touch-screen display allows easy operation and monitoring
Benefits:
• Microprocessor or PLC-based • Controller communicates
system controls all functions with plant SCADA systems
and dose pacing to minimize for centralized monitoring
energy use while maintaining of performance, lamp status,
required UV dose power levels, hours of
• Controller features intuitive, operation and alarm status
graphical display for
at-a-glance system status
The PLC-based controller combines

sophisticated system operation and reporting with
an operator-friendly, touch screen display.
System Specifications
Model 04AL20 08AL30 18AL40 32AL50 72AL75 D72AL75
Number of Lamps 4 8 18 32 72 144
Lamp Type High-efficiency, High-output, Low-Pressure Amalgam
Automatic Wiping System
Sleeve Wiping
(Optional Off-line Chemical Cleaning)
Ballast Electronic, constant output (100% power) Electronic, variable output (60 to 100% power)
Reactor Chamber
Materials of Construction 316L Stainless Steel
Standard Flange Size (ANSI/DIN), inches (mm) 6 (150) 8 (200) 10 (250) 12 (300) 20 (500) 20 (500)
Multiple orientations available
Outlet Flange Orientation
3, 6, 9, or 12 o’clock position
Approx. Reactor Length, inches (mm) 80 (2032) 80 (2032) 80 (2032) 90 (2286) 90 (2286) 152 (3861)
Max. Operating Pressure, PSI (bar) 150 (10) 150 (10) 150 (10) 100 (6.8) 65 (4.5) 65 (4.5)
Dry Reactor Weight, lbs (kg) 107 (49) 210 (95) 400 (181) 1600 (726) 2100 (953) 3700 (1678)
Wet Reactor Weight, lbs (kg) 232 (105) 480 (218) 877 (398) 2200 (998) 3700 (1678) 7200 (3265)
Power Distribution Center
Electrical Supply 240 VAC, 1 phase, 2 wire + GND, 50/60 Hz 480Y/277 V, 3 phase, 4 wire + GND, 60 Hz
Dimensions, inches 24 x 24 x 10 30 x 24 x 10 36 x 48 x 10 40 x 78 x 18 48 x 86 x 24 96 x 86 x 24
Dimensions, mm 610 x 610 x 254 762 x 610 x 254 914 x 1219 x 254 1016 x 1981 x 457 1219 x 2184 x 610 2438 x 2184 x 610
Mild Painted Steel

Available Materials of Construction
304 Stainless Steel
Panel Rating NEMA 3R or 4X NEMA 12 or 4X

System Control Center
Controller Microprocessor PLC-based
Location Built into Power Distribution Center (PDC) Stand-alone Panel
Electrical Supply N/A (see PDC) 120 V, 1 phase, 2 wire + GND, 60Hz
Panel Rating N/A (see PDC) NEMA 12 or 4X
Typical Outputs Provided Reactor status, common alarms and SCADA communication
Find out how your wastewater treatment plant can benefit from proven TrojanUVFIT™ solutions. Contact us today.
Head Office (Canada) Trojan UV Technologies UK Limited (UK): +44 1905 77 11 17

3020 Gore Road Trojan Technologies (The Netherlands): +31 70 391 3020
London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T7 Trojan Technologies (France): +33 1 6081 0516
Telephone: (519) 457-3400 Trojan Technologies Espana (Spain): +34 91 564 5757
Fax: (519) 457-3030 Trojan Technologies Deutschland GmbH (Germany): +49 6024 634 75 80
Hach/Trojan Technologies (China): 86-10-65150290
www.trojanuv.com
Printed in Canada. Copyright 2008. Trojan Technologies London, Ontario, Canada.

No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means
without the written permission of Trojan Technologies.
Products in this publication may be covered by one or more of the following patents: Can. 2,117,004; Can. 2,239,925;
US 5,418,370; US RE36,896; US 6,342,188; US 6,564,157; US 6,773,604; US 6,646,269; US 6,659,431; US 6,500,346.
Other patents pending.
OA-E-M&S-5.2-BR-CA0003-0908
APPENDIX H
Calculations for Odor Control System
B C D E F
1
2 TITLE: Ventialtion Requirments
3
4 Prepared by: C. Alix Date: 7/24/2009
5 Date:
6 Revision: 0
7
8
9 OBJECTIVE To determine ventialtion form WW processes excluding rooms
10
11 denotes calculated value
12
13 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS & INFORMATION
14 Inlet Screen
15 1 NFPA requires 12 ACH
16 2 H2S Concentration could govern vent rate
17 For Anoxic Zones
18 1 No NFPA requirement
19 2 Provide capture velocity of 100 ft/min across one hatch per zone
20 For Aeration Basins
22 2 Provide capture velocity of 100 ft/min across one hatch per zone
23 3 Collect input process air in addition to hactch capture air 150 cfm per basin
24 For Post Aeration Zone
26 2 Provide capture velocity of 100 ft/min across one of two hatches per zone
27 MBR
28 1 Collect scour air 130 cfm
30 Odor Control Area
31 1 NFPA requires 6 ACH within 3 ft of equipment
32 Rooms
33 1 All process air will be drawn from the rooms
34
35
36 DESCRIPTION UNIT CALCULATION COMMENT
37
38 Ventilation Calculation
39 Inlet Screen
40 Space Volume ft3 54
41 Air change Rate ACH 12
42 Min per air change minutes 5
43 Airflow ft3/min 11
44 Anoxic Zones
45 Number of zones 2
46 Hatch size ft2 9
47 Capture velocity ft/min 100
48 Open hatches per zone 1
49 Airflow ft3/min 1,800
50 Aeration Basins
51 Number of basins 2
52 Hatch size ft2 9
56 Post Anoxic Zone
57 Number of zones 2
58 Hatch size ft2 9
62 Odor Control Area
63 Assumed footprint area 15 x 15 ft2 225
64 Area Height around possible leak areas ft 10
65 Required air changes ACH 6
66 minutes per air change minutes 10
67 Airflow ft3/min 225
68 Total process air collection rate ft3/min 5,636
69
70 Room area 1
71 Length ft 18
72 Width ft 30
73 Height ft 19
74 Volume ft3 10,278
75 Rate ACH 12
76 Minutes per air change minutes 5
78 Room area 2
79 Length ft 30
80 Width ft 30
81 Height ft 15
82 Volume ft3 14,095
83 Rate ACH 12
84 Minutes per air change minutes 5
86 Total room air collection rate ft3/min 4,875 Process air governs ventilation thus 100% fresh air in rooms
87
3
88 Total ventilation in rooms ft /min 5,636
89 Constant fresh air supply ft3/min 5,636
90 Recirculation air ft3/min None
91
92
93
94
CALC_Odor Control_Rev 0.xlsx Ventilation Page 1

TITLE: Carbon Filter Sizing
Absorption
Inlet Air Properties Reference Capacity Vendor WEF MOP 8 Reference Table 13.
Caustic
General Impregna
(lbs/lbs carbon) Carbon Carbtrol Purafil TIGG Virgin ted Catalytic
Air flow 7,000 cfm Hydrogen Sulfide 0.20 0.05 0.30 0.04 0.29 0.20
o
Temperature 70 F siloxane
Relative Humidity 70 % Methyl Mercaptan
3
Specific Volume 13.5863 ft /lbs ASHRAE Handbook adjusted for temp and RH VOC 0.24 0.21 0.20
Molewcular Weight 28.97 lbs/lbs mole Dimethyl Sulfide
3
Molar Volume 393.6 ft /lbs mole Carbon Disulfide
Carbonyl Sulfide
Carbon Type Virgin Dimethyl Disulfide
Required Media Life 8760 hours
Properties
3
Density 28.09 lbs/ft Media specifications
Max face Velocity 50.0 ft/min
Residence Time 3.0 sec
Molecular Adsoption Compoun Carbon Carbon Carbon

Compound Concentration Weight Capacity d Loading Required Required Usage
(lbs/lbs
3
(ppm) mole) (lbs/lbs carbon) (lbs/hr) (lbs) (ft ) (lbs/day)
Hydrogen Sulfide 1.00 34 0.04 0.04 7,946 282.8 21.8
siloxane - 371 1 0.000 - -
Methyl Mercaptan - 48 1 0.00 - -
VOC 1.00 92 0.21 0.10 4,095 145.8 11.2
Dimethyl Sulfide - 62 1.00 0.00 - -
Carbon Disulfide - 94 1 0.00 - -
Carbonyl Sulfide - 1
Dimethyl Disulfide - 1
Total 12,041 429
Vessel Sizing
Bed type Dual

3
Carbon Volume Req'd 428.61 ft
Number of vessels 1.00
Req'd Vessel Diamter 9.44 ft
Vessel Diameter 10.00 ft
Total Bed Depth 5.46 ft
Total Bed Depth 6.00 ft
Residence time 3.67 seconds
Face Velocity 44.56 ft/min
Headloss through bed 1.00 in w.c./ft bed depth
Actual bed headloss 3.00 in w.c.
Bed type Radial

3
Carbon Volume Req'd 428.61 ft
Number of vessels 3.00 2.00 1.00
Req'd Vessel Diamter 7.00 8.00 10.00 ft
Bed Height 13.00 13.00 15.00 ft
Plenum Diameter 2.17 2.50 3.00 ft
Total Bed Dia. 4.23 4.90 6.40 ft
3
Total Bed volume 405.14 362.67 376.52 ft
Residence time 3.47 3.11 3.23 sec
Face Velocity 40.49 34.98 23.21 ft/min
Headloss through bed 0.50 0.50 0.50 in w.c./ft bed depth
Actual bed headloss 1.06 1.23 1.60 in w.c.

TM001

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TM001

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

To: Aladdin Shaikh,, City of Anaheim Date: August 8, 2009

Table 1 – Estimated Flow-rates for the Water Recycling Plant

For fine-screen, spray/conveyance water flow-rate needs to be maintained at 10,000

INFLUENT WASTEWATER CHARACTERIZATION

Table 2 - Influent Wastewater Characterization Parameters

Grab 24-hr composite Diurnal (2-hr composite)

Table 3 – Influent Wastewater Quality based on 24-hr Composite Samples

TARGET EFFLUENT WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS

Table 4 – Effluent Water Quality Requirements

Parameter Concentration Unit Standard

a) The filtered wastewater has been disinfected by either:

Design Specifications and Power Requirements

Table 5 – Specifications for Fine Screen

Scope of Supply & Equipment Warranty

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONFIGURATION

Table 6 – Biological Treatment Process Design Parameters

Design Specifications and Power Requirements

Table 7 – Mixers and Blower Design Specifications

Table 8 Municipal MBR Plants Utilizing X-Flow Tubular Membrane Modules

Table 9 - Membrane Specifications

Table 10 - Membrane System Configuration

Table 11 - Membrane Design Parameters

Scope of Supply & Equipment Warranty

Pro-rated membrane replacement =

New Membrane Cost x Months of Beneficial Use

Design Specifications and Power Requirements

Table 8 – Specifications for APT’s HiPOx Ozonation System

Scope of Supply and Equipment Warranty

Design Specifications and Power Requirements

Table 9 – Design Specifications for TrojanUVFit UV Disinfection System

Scope of Supply & Equipment Warranty

All odor control systems contain the following elements:

Ventilation and Emission Capture/Collection

Table 10 – Ventilation Requirements for Various Process Equipments

Area/Equipment Sizing Criteria Required Airflow

Foul Air Treatment

• Absorption filters – carbon and iron sponge filers;

Table 11 - Advantages and Disadvantages a biofilter

Table 12 - Advantages and disadvantages of the carbon filters

Exhaust of Treated Air

ELECTRICAL AND CONTROL SYSTEMS

Incoming Power to the Water Recycling Facility

Communications to the WRF

Power Feed to Diversion Structure

Communications to the Diversion Structure

Power Feed to Booster Pump at City Hall West

Communications to the booster pump station

construction. MWH recommends that a qualified shoring consultant be contracted by the

A: Water Quality Results from Lab

Water Quality Results from Lab

T: (714) 328- 2400

\\7.3\CALC_Equipment List_Rev 1.xlsx Overall Page 1 of 1

7/16/2009 Calc. By: Z. Hirani

Chlorine for cleaning membrane Comments

Stock chlorine concentration 12.5 % 125000 mg/L

Desired concentration of chlorine 1000 mg/L

Volume of chlorine required per module 45 gallons 170.1 L

Number of membrane modules to be cleaned 20

Total volume of cleaning solution 882 gallons 3335 L

Volume of stock solution to use per cleaning 7 gallons

Cleaning frequency 4 per month