You are on page 1of 4

In the Classroom

The Story of Nanomaterials in Modern Technology:


An Advanced Course for Chemistry Teachers
Ron Blonder
Department of Science Teaching, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, 76100 Israel;
ron.blonder@weizmann.ac.il

Nanoscience is an important new scientific field. Nano- development indicate the importance of their knowledge and
technology is the ability to create materials, devices, and systems professional enthusiasm. Many teachers in the education system
having fundamentally new properties and functions by working completed their training over 10 years earlier. As a result, their
at the atomic, molecular, and supramolecular levels (1). These science knowledge and acquaintance with important develop-
new properties are used as the basis for the development of new ments in science teaching is limited.
technology in electronics, magnetics, optoelectronics, medical To incorporate the three knowledge categories (content
diagnostics, alternative energy, and more. Roco emphasized the knowledge of nanoscience, pedagogical content knowledge, and
importance of education for the future developing of this field curricular knowledge) into the structure of the course, our course
(2, p 1247): “One of the `grand challenges' for nanotechnology is was designed by a chemistry professor together with a science
education, which is looming as a bottleneck for the development education researcher. Reshef Tenne, holder of the Drake Family
of the field”. Chair in Nanotechnology, Weizmann Institute of Science, and
Director of the Helen and Martin Kimmel Center for Nanoscale
Incorporating Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in the Science teamed with the author, a researcher in the Department
Curriculum of Science Education at the Weizmann Institute of Science.

Trying to deal with this challenge led to the creation of Aims of the Course
many educational programs, curricula, and modules in nano-
technology. Walters and Bullen (3) developed a nanomaterials Introduction to Materials and Nanotechnology was de-
one-week intersession course, aimed at introducing students to signed to expose high school teachers to modern research topics,
nanomaterials through synthesis and characterization of nano- introduce teachers to nanoscience, generate teacher interest, and
materials and understanding the potential implications of nano- increase chemistry teachers' nanoliteracy by providing them with
materials on society. Samet (4) described a capstone course in the basic principles of nanoscience.
nanotechnology for chemistry majors. This course was based on The course is structured accordingly: First, the instructor
four laboratory projects. Porter (5) described a course that teaches fundamental knowledge essential to understand topics in
emphasized the interdisciplinary nature of nanoscience and nanoscience and advanced materials characterization. Then, the
nanotechnology. In a different work by Ambrogi et al. (6), high students (who are high school teachers) apply this knowledge
school students learned about nanotechnology and prepared a while independently studying one topic that they select them-
slide presentation to introduce nanochemistry and nanotechnology selves. Here they integrate newly learned content with their PCK
to younger students. Educational efforts to master nanoscience are while presenting their selected topic to the other teachers and
needed to present this new science in such programs. then writing a scientific report. Research lab experiments that
Educators are faced with a problem: Most nanoscience follow provide the course participants with an additional op-
researchers received their training in disciplines other than portunity for knowledge integration. Here they experience an
nanoscience, and are faced with difficulties when teaching authentic research experiment and apply their knowledge to the
nanoscience (7). Conversely, it is challenging for teachers to research methods and to understanding the results.
keep up-to-date on advanced topics such as nanoscience, as they
completed their training before the advent of nanoscience, and Course Setting
will naturally find it difficult teaching content they do not know
well (8). Our course was designed to provide teachers with basic The course was part of a special M.Sc. program for science
concepts and knowledge in nanoscience, to arouse their enthu- teachers, The Rothschild-Weizmann program for Excellence in
siasm for modern chemistry and its applications, and allow them Science Teaching, which will be described elsewhere. In this
to teach advanced topics in nanochemistry. program, teachers participate in advanced courses related to their
Much literature on improving teaching and upgrading the main field of teaching, courses in pedagogy, and courses in science
professional status of teachers focuses on teachers' knowl- education research. The current course, Introduction to Materi-
edge (9, 10). The idea of a knowledge base for teachers was als and Nanotechnology, was given as one of the advanced
derived from Shulman's categories of knowledge (11, 12). Shul- courses in chemistry. The lectures were given by Weizmann
man distinguished between three categories of teachers' knowl- Institute faculty members specializing in the various subjects
edge: (i) subject matter content knowledge; (ii) pedagogical related to the course.
content knowledge (PCK); and (iii) curricular knowledge. Seven high school chemistry teachers studying for this
Research findings on the effectiveness of teachers' professional special M.Sc. degree program and one M.Sc. chemistry student

_ _ _
r XXXX American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc Vol. XX No. XX XX XXXX Journal of Chemical Education A
10.1021/ed100614f Published on Web ’’’
In the Classroom

participated in this course. The 48-h course focused on the two reasons: the importance of each method in nanoscience and
science content of materials and nanotechnology, and an addi- the availability of the equipment and expertise at the Weizmann
tional 28 h focused on pedagogy and its connection to educa- Institute. Each method is presented by a lecture and a visit to the
tional field. In this paper, we shall concentrate only on the corresponding laboratory. Both the lectures and lab visits are
scientific part of the course. guided by the scientific staff member (senior research associate)
who works with the equipment on a daily basis. The operating
Course Structure and Content principles and the data that can be obtained using these methods
are explained, and examples of real experimental results are
Structure Rationale discussed. In Modules 3 and 4 of the course, participants are
The first two modules;qualitative quantum mechanics, required to read research papers and to understand experimental
and advanced characterization methods in materials research; lab results.
provide participants with the basic concepts of nanoscience. In
the remaining modules, participants apply this acquired knowl- Module 3: Selected Advanced Topics in Materials Science
edge. The course's structure guides participants to connect and Nanotechnology
physical principles, chemical materials, and technological appli- Each student chooses a topic presented in the introduction.
cations in the field of nanoscience. This connection is imple- The course assignments were designed to have participants apply
mented in subsequent modules: students in the course present their understanding of the first two modules, as they were now
lectures on selected topics in materials science and nanotechnology, more nanoliterate. After choosing a subject, participants receive a
and participate in authentic research in the laboratories of the file of initial literature resources including three-four scientific
Weizmann Institute. The fifth module, connection to education, papers and reviews on their chosen subject (as shown in the
focuses on the educational applications of nanoscience. online supporting information). First, participants read about
the topic, find additional scientific papers on the topic, and then
Introduction write their questions. Next, the participants receive two kinds of
The introduction was planned to give participants a general personal guidance: general guidance, and scientific guidance. The
idea about the course and its aims. The first meeting began with a general face-to-face guidance helps participants understand the
historical survey of material science from ancient times to present scientific terms used in the papers, guides them during library
day, and an explanation on the structure of the course. This was searches for more papers in the relevant topic, and assists them in
followed by a brief description of 14 chosen topics in nanotechnol- building a slide presentation. The scientific face-to-face guidance
ogy: blue (white) light-emitting diodes; ferroelectricity; carbon includes a discussion on the chosen scientific topic, focusing on
fullerenes and nanotubes; giant magneto-resistance; magnetic sto- individual participant's written questions. Participants present
rage and spintronics; nano optoelectronics and nanosensors; nano- their topics as 50-min lectures followed by 10 min for general
composites; organic light-emitting diodes; photovoltaics; quantum discussion. The topics chosen by the students are presented in
dots; quasicrystals; shape memory alloys; superconductivity; and Table 1 and appear as the first eight topics in the online
superhard coatings. These subjects, representing important research supporting information. The subjects cover different aspects of
and technological applications, were chosen to provide participants nanoscience and different applications in electronic and optical
with various options to choose from for their presentations, which properties, mechanical properties, energy, and magnetism. A list
they delivered later in the course. of the initial references for the different topics is presented in the
online supporting information. The important criteria for
Module 1: Qualitative Quantum Mechanics choosing the subjects was the relevance to both materials science
On the basis of quantum effects, materials in the nanoscale and nanotechnology in the broader sense of the word, and their
acquire new properties. The first module of the course aims to relevance to contemporary science and technology.
provide participants with a background on quantum mechanics.
The module opens by demonstrating that classical physics failed Students' Lectures
to address certain problems. Quantum mechanics provides an Students in the course (high school teachers) present
explanation and an alternative and comprehensive description lectures on different topics in nanoscience, all sharing the same
for those unexplained physical phenomena. We discuss quantum format. The lectures begin with the historical development of the
mechanics as a wave theory, the Schrodinger equation, and topic, then proceed with the technological goals of that topic.
selected predictions of the Schrodinger's equation. Finally, the Most of the lecture is devoted to the physical and chemical
connection between quantum mechanics and chemistry is em- aspects of the topic and its technological applications. The
phasized by presenting chemistry as a many-electron quantum summary includes relevant Israeli contributions to the specific
problem. This module is taught by L. Kronik, whose research subject, technological advances related to the topic, future
focuses on the quantum theory of materials. expectations, and criticism. Each student also submits a written
report at the end of the course.
Module 2: Characterization Methods
The second module is designed to make the participants Module 4: Research Lab Experiments
nanoliterate. Six characterization methods are introduced: During the last scientific module, participants take part in
scanning probe microscopy (AFM, STM); transmission electron two ongoing experiments in nanochemistry research labs, thus,
microscopy (TEM); scanning electron microscopy (SEM); X-ray performing authentic experiments together with the institute's
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS); X-ray diffraction (XRD); chemistry research students. The first experiment is called
and transport measurements. These methods were selected for Drawing with Nanotubes (13, 14). In this experiment, the

_ _ _
B Journal of Chemical Education Vol. XX No. XX XX XXXX pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc r XXXX American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.
In the Classroom

Table 1. Structure for the Course: Introduction to Materials and Nanotechnology

Course Modules Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Topics Time Allotted

0. Introduction First look on nanotechnology


A short description of 14 advanced topics in 2h
materials science and nanotechnology
1. Qualitative quantum mechanics Difficulties with classical physics
Quantum mechanics as a wave theory
Schrodinger's equation
Selected predictions of Schrodinger's equation
Chemistry as a many-electron quantum problem 12 h
2. Characterization methods: AFM; STM;Atomic force microscope; Scanning tunneling microscope
Each of these methods was introduced through TEM;Transmission electron microscope
a lecture (2 h) and a lab demonstration (1 h) SEM;Scanning electron microscope
XPS;X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
XRD;X-ray diffraction
Transport measurements 18 h
3. Students' lectures: Selected advanced Superconductivity
topics in materials science and nanotechnology Photovoltaic cells
Light-emitting diodes (LED)
Organic light-emitting diodes (OLED)
Shape memory alloys
Quantum dots
Carbon fullerenes and nanotubes
Nanocomposites 18 h
4. Research lab experiments Drawing with nanotubes (13, 14)
Electrospinning nanotube-reinforced composites (15, 16) 8h
5. Connection to education How to write a scientific report
The structure of a good presentation
Transferring content to the teacher's classroom 28 h

students perform electrodeposition of gold on carbon nanotubes questions: (i) questions about the scientific lecture contents;
that are grown onto quartz substrates. They study the effect of (ii) questions pertaining to the topics that were selected by the
gold ion concentration in solution on the resulting density and students and their presentations; and (iii) questions about the
size of electrodeposited nanoparticles, using both optical micro- course's connection to teaching. This part of the course was
scopy and AFM. Participants also use AFM to check the continuously assessed by educational researchers and will be
diameter-size distribution of the nanotubes grown, using ferritin discussed elsewhere.
as a catalyst.
The second experiment is called Electrospinning Nanotube- Students' Responses to the Course
Reinforced Composites (15, 16). In this experiment, participants
are introduced to the preparation and mechanical test of carbon After the introductory meeting, participants responded in
nanotube (CNT)-reinforced composites. First, the participants two ways: they were excited to learn about the appealing subject
are introduced to the principle of electrospinning and prepared of nanochemistry and also had some trepidation. Both senti-
electrospun poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) fiber under ments are found in these comments from the first workshop they
high voltage (7 kV). They observe the resultant fibers collected participated in (pseudonyms are used).
on glass slides using optical microscope. The fibers have a high aspect Sara: I always wanted to know what nanochemistry is and
ratio, that is, submicrometer diameters and lengths of a few about its applications.
centimeters. Second, they learn the principles of tensile tests and Shir: I tell my students that nanotechnology is an amazing
the meaning of the results, and watch videos of tensile tests of field, but although I teach the program of nanotechnology in
school, I am never quite sure that I understand it well enough.
electrospun PMMA and PMMA/MWCNTs. Participants are then
given dog-bone specimens of neat epoxy and of CNT-reinforced Participants' enthusiasm was countered with deep concerns,
epoxy: they tensile-test the specimens and analyze the results. and they expressed them:
Yael: The course assignments, like preparing a lecture and
Module 5: Connection to Education writing a scientific report on a selected topic may be too
Participants met among themselves every week for 2 h to difficult for us; I don't think that I am up to it.
discuss different aspects of nanochemistry. They were guided by After concluding the last course session, participants were
the author, a researcher in science education who received asked to complete a questionnaire containing a knowledge test
her Ph.D. in chemistry in the field of nanochemistry (17). This and requesting their feedback regarding the course. The knowl-
module was presented throughout the entire course. edge test was given twice, at the beginning of the course and then
The discussion was based on the participants' questions again at its end. Participants were asked to explain a list of
related to the course, and included three different types of concepts related to nanochemistry. Comparing the participants'

_ _ _
r XXXX American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc. pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc Vol. XX No. XX XX XXXX Journal of Chemical Education C
In the Classroom

that serve us in everyday research all over the world. I feel that
you are now more literate than before... My hope is that you
will transfer what you have learned here to your own students.
Science educators who would like to consider teaching this
course in their institution are welcome to contact the author for
additional details regarding the course and its curriculum.
Acknowledgment
I am especially grateful to Reshef Tenne for his profession-
alism and kindness and for many hours of guidance. I am also
grateful to the scientists who took part in this project in-
cluding: Leeor Kronik (teaching the first module); Hagai Cohen
(XPS); Yishai Feldman (XRD); Sidney R. Cohen (STM, AFM);
Konstantin Gartsman (SEM); Eyal Shimoni (SEM); Ronit
Popovitz-Biro (TEM); Gregory Leitus (transport measurements);
Figure 1. Profiles of students' knowledge in nanotechnology before
XiaoMeng Sui and Noa Lachman (Daniel H. Wagner's research
participating in the course (PRE) and after it ended (POST), by nano-
science topic.
lab experiment: Electrospinning Nanotubes Reinforced Compo-
sites); and Nitzan Shadmi and Tohar Yarden (Ernesto Joselevich's
achievements in the pre- and posttests showed a remarkable research lab experiment: Drawing with Nanotubes). The course
improvement in their conceptual understanding of nanochem- is part of the Rothschild-Weizmann program for Excellence in
istry (Figure 1). The participants' answers were graded as Science Teaching and was supported by the Rothschild-Caesarea
following: 0, for a wrong answer or no answer; 1, for partial Foundation.
answer; and 2, for a full answer. Figure 1 presents the average
scores for each item in the pre- and posttests. Literature Cited
The Wilcoxon signed rank test was applied to the overall 1. Roco, M. C. J. Nanopart. Res. 2001, 3, 5.
difference between the average pre- and posttest scores (p < 0.05). 2. Roco, M. C. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 1247.
Results show that in the posttest the participants achieved 3. Walters, K. A.; Bullen, H. A. J. Chem. Educ. 2008, 85, 1406.
average scores quite close to the full answer (maximum). Inter- 4. Samet, C. J. Nano Educ. 2009, 1, 15.
estingly, no correlation emerged between the pretest and the 5. Porter, L. A. J. Chem. Educ. 2007, 84, 259.
posttest scores, that is, the posttest scores are not related to 6. Ambrogi, P.; Caselli, M.; Montaltic, M.; Venturic, M. Chem. Educ.:
students' preexisting knowledge. Res. Pract. 2008, 9, 5.
The participants were also interviewed and asked to describe 7. Drane, D.; Swarat, S.; Light, G.; Hersam, M.; Mason, T. J. Nano
their learning experiences during the course. They enthusiasti- Educ. 2009, 1, 8.
cally described what they gained from the course and how it 8. Tomasik, J. H.; Jin, S.; Hamers, R. J.; Moore, J. W. J. Nano Educ.
influenced their teaching, as reflected by these comments: 2009, 1, 48.
Samira: Before I took this course I knew nothing about 9. Borko, H. Educ. Researcher 2004, 33, 3.
nanochemistry, except for the fact that nano is very small. I 10. Munby, H.; Russell, T.; Martin, A. K. In Handbook of Research on
learned a lot during the course but the most exciting part for Teaching, 4th ed.; Richardson, V., Ed.; American Educational
me was self-learning of a whole new topic in nanotechnology: Research Association: Washington, DC, 2001; p 877.
its history, the chemistry and the physics related to it and its 11. Shulman, L. S. Educ. Researcher 1986, 15, 4.
applications... I even told my son that he should specialize in
12. Shulman, L. S. Harv. Educ. Rev. 1987, 57, 1.
nanotechnology when he grows up.
Shir: In school, I told my students about the new topics I 13. Ismach, A.; Kantorovich, D.; Joselevich, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
learned about during the course, telling them also about the 127, 11554–11555.
subject I studied in depth. I am now clearly aware that some 14. Geblinger, N.; Ismach, A.; Joselevich, E. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3,
concepts in nanochemistry were unclear to me even though I 195–200.
was teaching a nano program. Now I feel that I have acquired 15. Vaisman, L.; Wachtel, E.; Wagner, H. D.; Marom, G. Polymer
greater knowledge and deeper understanding in this field. 2007, 48, 6843–6854.
As reflected from the participants' statements as presented 16. Wagner, H. D. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 742-744 (News & Views).
above, the goals set for the course were fully achieved. The course 17. Blonder, R. Control of Structure and Function of Biomaterials by
provided them with the basic tools and knowledge to become External Triggering Signals. Ph.D. Thesis, The Hebrew University
nanoliterate. of Jerusalem, Israel, 1999.
I end this paper quoting Reshef Tenne when he summarized
the course: Supporting Information Available
Science is not only textbooks. The genuine research work Initial references given to the students as an introduction material
happens in the laboratories, and is described in research for learning of the 14 topics in materials and nanoscience. This material
journals. In this course we exposed you to the scientific tools is available via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

_ _ _
D Journal of Chemical Education Vol. XX No. XX XX XXXX pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc r XXXX American Chemical Society and Division of Chemical Education, Inc.

You might also like